Gwyneth Paltrow slipped into a LBD and posed with photographer Steven Klein at his event benefiting the Amaryllis Farm Equine Rescue in the Hamptons on Saturday night. Gwyn has been very philanthropic these days, showing her support for various charities. This time the cause is for animals — helping save horses from slaughter. Not only has this working mommy been showing off her sweeter side, but she's also still proving herself sexy with those killer legs.

















Zac Posen
Soft Grey
S***r
Gweneth started wearing short stuff for awhile
1What's with the short dresses......... So UNclassy!!!!!
2Put some additional inches to those butt-lenghted dresses, you look like a fool Gwy!
(Can't believe nobody told her yet..)
The dress is cute and all, but to be honest I don't like her face.
3To use the term "little" is putting it lightly. Grow up and act your age Gwynnie.
4She needs to address those tresses along with the duds. Who lopped off her hair? Not a good look for her.
5Good for her.
6She is a head taller than him in those shoes. I love it!
7I love that she is taller too - but what is with that make-up? I bet Estee Lauder is having a fit!!!
letter2elise....those are 2 sweet babies in your picture. PRECIOUS!!
8She looks pregnant in that dress.
9Hate her hair and her face looks manly.
10he seems to be enjoying it
11I think she is pregnant, there have been a lot of photos of her lately looking like she has a baby bump and I wouldn't be saying that if it just looked like she gained a little weight.
12She's just trying to get attention so she can get more movie roles.
13living in texas my whole life, i adore horses. I really admire her for supporting such a great, over-looked cause.
14i think her legs are fierce and she has every right to flaunt em!
The dress is just too short. It could be a few inches longer and still show off her legs. I guess it just gets her more attention wearing it that way. I'm not sure what is going on with her hair.
15Please tell me that if you had legs like gwen you wouldn't show them off. She look's sophisticated and ladylike as well as still having fun with what she's wearing. Yes the dress is short but it's an amazing cut and fabric! And what's wrong with the hair.. long hair is so overrated she looks a million times better with her new locks... I have to agree with some of the comments about her being pregnant.. there has been some belly hiding going on...
16She needs to find a new look. I've seen those legs too many times!
17I feel like I'm the only one who likes her sometimes.
18I wish I had her legs...
19I love her hair this length. And she has great legs
20I love her hair like this! That stick-straight, long hair that she used to have doesn't look good on anyone, and is way too trendy. It's the look that people will see pictures of in 20 years and say, "what were they thinking". Like the bad hairstyles of the 80's.
21she really has been quite active these past few weeks in the Hampton's - but i guess it's good for her to have something to do right?
i think that it's always nice for celebs to get involved in causes - especially when they
aren't necessarily the 'big ones' that get all the coverage.
22Um... she doesn't look cute AT ALL here.
23Love her and love the look. Go Gwy, you look terrific.
24I'm pretty sure she's pregnant. There have been lots of unconfirmed reports out there and this dress isn't helping her cause if she isn't. She definitely does have killer legs. But I agree that she could add a few inches to that hemline and still show them off.
25I think it's a great, great dress. I think if she weren't a movie star the length would be a bit naff at 36 years old, but she is incredibly well put together, and she is a movie star. If she is pregnant, structured stuff is the chicest best way to go and impossible for mortals to find, but if your best friends are designers, probably not so impossible.
26Yes, she has lovely legs, but please, you're a mother, and in your 30s. Drop the hem length a few inches. It doesn't have to be matronly, by any stretch of the imagination, but it shouldn't be so short that I'm embarrassed that I might accidentally see something I don't want to.
27Mid thigh would be fantastic. And classier.
She has incredible legs, yes. But this dress is too short for anyone other than a baby, maybe, because she is in imminent danger of flashing. A bit longer would be more dignified.
28Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.