Fergie and Josh Duhamel were photographed for Elle on their wedding night in these black and white shots. We're all for getting the inside scoop on their big day, but these pictures seem more private than the average celebrity wedding photos, including the set they already released. So tell us what you think — are these photos cute or TMI?
Vivance
Penhaligon
Y-3
adorable....hey you're only hot and young for so long....why not make some of your wedding photos a little sexy....they're not obscene, they look like how my boyfriend and i would be, snuggled spending a few quality moments together....why not
1Josh Looks soooooo sexy there.
2gross.
3Just weird considering they LOOK intimate but there were clearly photographers there...
4I don't think they are gross. I actually think they are beautiful but should have stayed private. Not for the world.
5Not TMI, just cheesy all the way.
6looks like a wannabe W spread. i don't really get it. i would have preferred to see photos of their actual wedding, this just seems like it should have been kept private. on a side note, they are both super hot.
7cuteeeeeeeeeeee
8I think they are cute. Obviously staged.. but cute..
9Oh they are a lovely couple! I hope they last and aren't just hollywood.
10By taking these photos, they can NEVER, EVER complain about the paparazzi invading their privacy, or they cannot complain about their fame. They have now crossed a line, in my opinion, with these pics.
11That's fine and all to have these pictures taken but I think releasing them is just kinda weird.
12I don't think I'd ever do this, but I think it's a nice idea... privately! Why would want to invite the public into your bedroom?
13I think they're cute. I think it's a bit weird releasing them, but her, worse has happened. They're a lovely couple though
I wish every happiness to them.
14*but hey.
15i agree with above- the pics are good- i've seen others do pics like this before. just the releasing them part is a bit odd. unless they didn't sanction it
16ya know, I get it but it comes across as corny or lame when they let "us" see them...I'm not a family member or friend so why would I need to see this? Personally, I'd have that collage framed in black & white next to my bed, not online
17Tink08...i agree with you 100%. if you are going to share pictures like this, then you cant complain on not having any privacy.
18I feel bad for saying this but I never liked them. Is it true Josh left his fiancee for Fergie?
19The happy couple told their friends and family not to bring any cameras or cell phones into the wedding, and then they sell their special moments to the press?? WTF?? If I were Fergie and Josh I would try to keep these pictures and the others that were released from their honeymoon, private for themselves and stop trying to make money from their special day. Have some class, Fergs!
20Yes, moviequeen, when Josh left his long-time girlfriend and fiancee for Fergie. I am perplexed by that as well!
21looks like he's carrying a tranny in the right picture
22I think he is cute, but I agree with the comment that she looks like a tranny. If you see before and after pictures of her when she had all of her plastic surgery, and trust me, she has had alot, she doesn't even look like the same person.
Never got her appeal. I also think whoring out the bedroom pics is so trailer park...what, you need the money?
23the whole privacy issue will come up soon. give me a break. i find her so unattractive - ugh.
24Not a fan of either of em and I certinaly do not like being exposed to a wedding pic taken IN BED! WTF is that all about? I am glad I can look thru my wedding album and see that everyone is standing erect lmao
25The bed photos are creeeeeepy. They're posing like they're about to make love on their wedding night! So, they want us to imagine that? If I want soft core porn, Fergie, I'll get Cinemax thank you very much.
26meh. they're both good looking people. i think it's great
27the pictures are beautiful. However, I think the two pics on the left hand side should be kept private. There is no need to show personal photos to the public like that. Not classy.
28i like the one where he's holding her like he's carrying her over the threshold but the others are really unnecessary. i don't know - there's just something that i just don't need to see about people in bed.
29They look really cute .
She's one lucky girl!
30photoshoot...just cute. It's like when Becks and Victoria did that photoshoot in the hotel room in the bed. I don't think this was their wedding night. I think it was just a photoshoot after the wedding or even days after.
31Ugh, plastic surgery-face in pic 3. Her face always looks so awful to me on film. But for some reason, I think she generally looks a lot better on video? Weird.
32I don't think they're private at all. Some professional photog took the picture. They look for sale.
33gag me.
34cha ching!
35It's not like it's a sex tape!
And god knows there are plenty of them.
I think it's cute.
Too much information for me is Spidey in the supermarket.
36these are sweet
37Why would they want to share those? They're very sweet for a private photo album but to share with the WORLD? I don't think so.
38I agree -- the two pics on the left are rather intimate. They're over-sharing, in my opinion. To dignify their marriage, those (tender) moments should be for their eyes only.
39I don't feel that it's over-sharing or TMI because it's obvious not a genuinely intimate or private moment. It's a staged scene choregraphed and lighted by a professional photographer--no different than if he were at work in his chosen profession as an actor or she were on stage as a performer.
Therein lies my issue or problem-->now nothing about them seems real or genuine, not even their marriage or relationship.
40Actually a lot of wedding photogs do this now and this was not their real wedding night pics. Fergie was in a totaly different outfit at the reception, it was just a photoshoot.
I think they are hot.
BTW Josh did NOT LEAVE his ex fiancee for Fergie. She broke up with him in April and he met Fergie in Sept of the same year.
His ex was a mege jealous woman who would freak out when he shared scenes with women on screen and even when he took pics with fans.
I know someone who worked taking pics for the soap stars and he said Josh's ex was so insecure.
Josh did not dump her, she could not handle his career.
Fergie is a very nice person who allows Josh to be himself.
41tmi
42tmi, they aren't sleezy or anything but something that maybe should have just been for the two of them and not so much for the whole world to see.
43I think they're cute pictures.
44I think that's TMI although Josh looks hot
45Never ever in my life have I seen any wedding photos like this...after the reception most normal couples want privacy, not a photographer following you to bed!-WHO DOES THIS! Who would even want these for their own private collection--I'm not saying they are sleazy, but I just don't see the need...this bothers me for some reason.
46Beautiful photographs, but the bed pics should have stayed private!
47I like them both...but Fergie seriously needs some fillers to get rid of those track marks on her face from all her past herion use. If you look at pics of her from when she was in Wild Orchid...it's like, night and day! That's what substance abuse will do to your mug!
48This seems to be intrusive and completely staged at the same time. Strange.
49Uhm what? Track marks in her face? No one shoots in their face. Arms, Legs etc, but not face. Dug addiction can do many things to your body (bad teeth, thinning hair, premature wrinkles etc) but I think it's more important to appluad her for coming out of it on top.
50I think the pictures are beautiful, it's obviously a photoshoot not their actual wedding night.
Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.