First. She looks lovely and that was a great interview.

Good interview, but they went overboard with the photoshop for that cover, I almost didn't recognize her - seems like they squished her eyes closer together or something . . .

she looks gorge! love her and her personality. she's fun and no frills!

I would love to see her take on a more dangerous role!

ugh, I wish she would go away.

I agree MissyB1984 about the photoshop, although she does look nice. And good grief, at some point STOP asking her about this divorce. I refuse to believe that she wants it to loom over her like a permanent storm-cloud.

She is *not* a gorgeous person **inside**. Smug, self serving, whiner. If she doesn't *owe* anyone her side of the sad tale of Jen & Brad, why did she do all the public whining to begin with? Poor little Jen. All dressed up and not an ounce of humility to be found.

I like the cover, its much better than her GQ one, her eyes pop with that beautiful turquoise color, she looks really young and vibrant. I also really really like her interview. I did have a chuckle about the action roles part...but you will never until you try so I hope she gets an opportunity to do that.

do you think that there's ever going to be a time when we'll stop seeing people ask her about her and brad and their divorce and all that? i just don't think that either person dwells on it so much, and it's just dumb at this point. i just don't know.

anyway, i love that she's seeing so much success on her own, and i can't wait to see what's next

i love her and the interview

She looks beautiful on the cover and I watch the clip on
the German tv show. It was really cute. She and Owen
seem really relaxed with each other.

I am so tired of her.

I find her pointless and she really thinks too highly of her ability.

If she wants to be 'daring' then just take a picture with no makeup or photoshop and then put it on a mag cover.

I am with you Le Etiana

"She is *not* a gorgeous person **inside**. "

I didn't know we had someone who knows her on Sugar.

what parts is she talking about? she plays the same character over and over and over and over and over....

She's no OSCAR worthy actress. Please.

If she wants to be 'daring' then just take a picture with no makeup or photoshop and then put it on a mag cover.
Agree

I've actually seen most of her films, including the ones that no one else bothers to watch like Derailed and Friends with Money and I have to say she's a very good dramatic actress who was not shy about taking on demanding roles that are the opposite of what she's famous for. Those kind of movies tend to flop, regardless of who's in them.
I think that one day she will get her reward with a script she can sink her teeth into that will turn into a successful movie and surprise everyone!

What actress appears on a cover of a mag with no make up and airbrush? show me one please!

She's a one note actress in my opinion, no matter what movie she makes it's like watching Rachel again and again and again.....

Not a huge fan of hers, but I will admit, she looks pretty here, although I almost did not recognize her!

gorgeous and very good interview

I am not a fan, but I like this cover. The colors, everything... Her body looks good here. Maybe it is photoshop, but I prefer photoshop than an ugly cover. Ugly cover: Courtney Love!

She is a one-note actress who can only do those quirky comedy characters she gets offered. She totally brought down Derailed with her unbelievable villain portrayal. If she doesn't like being misinterpreted, then she needs to close her mouth for once instead of spilling her guts like she always does.

She looks good.

wow she looks beautiful, love the interview

There's a reason why she's being offered only quirky, girl-next-door roles: that's what she looks like. She is NOT glamorous in the James Bond girl type of way. It's the same as a dark, exotic-looking actress wanting roles for an all-American girl-next-door character - not going to happen. She needs to accept the limitation of her looks - she's cute, but not the drop-dead gorgeous stunner that a typical Bond Girl exemplifies.

Maybe she could be M and replace Judi Dench, she is old enough...

Some people are so stupid

You know what... Aniston could end all these stupid questions in five minutes. The next time some dumb paparazzi throws a question at her about Brad Pitt, she says the following:

"I am not answering any questions about my divorce, my ex-husband or his current life. Everyone has moved on and it's time for you to move on, too." And then walk away.

But NOOOOOOOO. She has to keep going on and on about how heroes and villains, how misunderstood she is, yadda yadda yadda.

And then she complains that people say she still isn't over it. She obviously isn't over it. If she were, she would simply refuse to talk about it.

Period. End of discussion.

I couldn't see her as a Bond girl, but she was really great in The Good Girl. I could see Jen playing grittier roles and pulling them off well.

Great interview and she looks pretty on the cover. I'm glad she didn't talk about the divorce. Everything anyone says about it gets taken out of context. And while I agree some of her acting is one note, I highly recommend watching The Good Girl.

She can't act to save her life. All right, that's a little harsh. She's a one-role actress and has never had the guts to go in another direction because it's better to do what you know how to do best and cash in a lot of money. Never put yourself in danger, professionally speaking. It sure as hell is more comfortable, I'll give her that.

But I guess, when it comes to the 7th art, it's the difference between art and industry. Between an average entertainer and a great actor. When I think about the likes of Rourke, Penn, Pacino and de Niro or Streep, Blanchett, Mirren, Winslet etc. They try and do something different. Face challenging roles. Take risks. They live for their art.

I'm not criticizing Aniston about her choices as an actress. But I wish everyone (and herself) would stop consider her as something she's not. She's average. Full stop. And I sincerely think that had she not being married to Brad Pitt, she wouldn't have had the "career" she's had. Because there are a lot of pretty girls out there who are ready to take on her roles.

I don't really care about her private life, but I do have to admit that everytime she does an interview, she talks about her divorce/boyfriend/family etc. How are is it to say "no comment" ? Seriously ?

We also are lucid people, Ms Aniston. You have to get your share out of this because I don't think you're a masochist. If you really couldn't stand all this drama, you would have put a stop to it a long time ago.

PS : I'm giving her a gold star for the Good Girl. That's the only one for now...

"How HARD is it"... sorry

First, there are three people involved who could easily learn to say "No comment" when asked. For the record, not one of them has learned to say that yet. They are ALL perpetuating it.

Second, I'm not exactly sure how saying "I don't owe anyone my side" and "there are no bad guys" is a bad thing.

Third, how could anyone possibly not recognize that this picture is of Jennifer Aniston. Methinks people like to exagerate.

Fourth, I missed the part where she overestimated her acting abilities. Did she say she was out for an Oscar? I'm pretty sure I read simply that she wanted to try roles that were outside the realm of how she's been cast, typically. I would hope most actors would want to do that.

I've seen almost all of her movies and think she's a pretty limited actress. Even some of the ones in her light comedy niche, like Friends with Money and Rumor Has It sucked, in spite of excellent supporting cast. Derailed was aptly named... a low point for Clive's resume. The Good Girl was her best ever film.

People will start to believe she's over her marriage when she learns to shut up about it. She mentions saving Brad's recorded messages to help promote her last film.

On the other hand, if it weren't for her famous ex keeping her in the headlines, she would be about as culturally relevant as David Schwimmer and Matt LeBlanc these days.

#34 "No comments"? Really? In media language "no comments" means yes, I'm guilty of the acussations, I have things to hide and terefore can't talk about it, and finally you are right mr. journalist.
Answering "no comments" would do her more harm than saying anything else.
I'm sick of the "divorce question" but one thing we must remember is that this question will sell magazines and make money.It is a sure sell just like pictures of celebrities and their newborns, pregnancies, and drug stories. It's entertainment and food for the masses.

I must admit I'm not a big fan of her acting (although Friends and romantic comedies aren't up my alley), but good god this woman can't win with some of you people!

Jennifer Aniston says she's really happy and enjoying life...people comment that she's a 'whiner' and wants sympathy.

She gets slammed for doing the same types of roles and when she says she wants to branch out and try new things, some of you slam her for thinking she's capable of anything else.

As far as her acting skills, what's wrong with having a specialty, if you will? Some actresses like Drew Barrymore, Sandra Bullock, Meg Ryan once upon a time, and JA specialize in certain genre. If nobody is critisizing Mr. Brosnam for doing Bond movies, Adam Sandler for doing comedies, how come we are crtisizing J. Aniston for doing what she does well?

The party is over and the dishes are DONE and that is her former life with Brad Pitt. I agree with all of you that said: "NO COMMENT". That is usually done before the interview starts. Ms. Aniston is a TV actor not a movie actor. Classes need to be taken and alot of discipline has to be applied to discover that hidden talent. She is not that serious into her craft and so she gets by. And if she is happy and that is a big if, live the life and don't invest that much time into the past with all these ridiculous and lame interviews. At the Oscars she truly looked nervous she needs to overcome those feelings to be able to "act" in any given situation and hone her craft.

Regarding her divorce, I agree with what # 31 said.

I do like this cover even though I've never found her particularly beautiful. However, I do not see her as a Bond girl...and that doesn't necessarily have to do with her limited acting skills, let's face it: you don't need a lot of talent to play a Bond girl anyway. I just can't see her as a "badass" kind of woman.

Based on the "natural" photo of her I saw at the Oscars, she doesn't need to be Photoshopped to the point where her eyes don't even look human.

If you ask me, she knows what she's doing- those who claim to dislike her still feel compelled to comment (I'm post 44). She's beautiful, she looks fun, her movies are fun, and since I know someone in the service industry who has met her several times and says she couldn't be more polite, I'm inclined to give her the benefit of the doubt.

Not every actress is trying to win an Oscar. She makes a lot of money doing what she enjoys, and once in a while she gets offered a role that lets her take a risk.

She really can't win, can she?!
She said what she said because she obviously feels she's being wronged by some of her critics and that means you people, who keep throwing bogus accusations at her.
I wish some of you would just admit that if you don't like a person, you will find a fault in everything that person does. I don't like Angelina so I have no problem admitting that the things she does irritate me even though if this was someone else, I wouldn't bother.
Just admit to not liking someone and stop rationalising it!

She's so right, she can't win with the Brad questions. She can't win with ANY question really. When people read her saying "I'm happy" her fans believe it, and her non-fans think she's lying. If she says she was hurt when the marriage ended, she's still not over him (who DOESN'T hurt when a marriage ends?). If she says she WASN'T hurt then she's saying that she's cold and heartless.

This is one girl that can't win no matter what she says or does and I feel empathy for her. I do NOT feel sorry for her, hell I'd LOVE to have her life.

She looks great here. However, she will never be a Bond Girl, she's not the model type. She's just the girl next door with a good diet and sense of humor..

Im not a fan but she is aging hotly. She looks young for her age while Jolie looks 40 than her young age.

I can't get enough of Jen, keep the articles coming!

I like most of her movie and she looks good I think.
Would love to see her do some action too.