It looks like those Federline-Spears babies just can't keep their mouths shut! I kid, of course, but both Us Weekly and Life & Style had this idea for their covers this week: Britney's Babies Need Help! I always find it a little odd when celebrity babies get magazine covers without their famous parents, but at this point people would rather hear about the cute boys than either Brit or Kevin. Inside Us Weekly focuses on the boys' health -- soda in the bottles, her desires to get their teeth whitened. Meanwhile L&S tells a sad story about her neglectful behavior, saying that she hands JJ off when he cries and that she has taught SP to deliver her cigarettes to her when she asks for "mommy's lollipops." Yikes, well if those stories are true, those cover statements are definitely right that the boys could use some H-E-L-P.
Eric Van Peterson
Casadei
Jipepe
Oh man that US Weekly cover is something else.
1Mommy's lollipops??? That so wrong in so many ways.
Bad Britney!
2I just shake my head at this whole thing! I feel bad for those kids!
3*That's I meant. Sorry!
4Britney makes me sick!
5That is just tragic. She needs to grow up! Skank
6did we not have a debate about her kids being a bit too big a few weeks ago. I know these are tabloids and they embelish their stories but from Trailer Park Barbie's recent actions I totally believe she could do some of these things. You know what Jesus ain't taking this wheel.
7i don't care how crazy she is,it's always wrong IMO to have children on the cover of magazines without their parents consent,and everything from life and style is a lie, but i have to say they were pretty creative with the 'lollipop' story, that made lol.
8Maybe she wouldn't have to get their teeth whitened if she didn't put pop in their bottles!!! I can't believe that's true. I feel so bad for those little boys. I wonder what KFed thinks of all this.
9Omg, that is horrible! I wonder if it's really true...it wouldn't really shock me if it was true b/c it sounds like something Britney would do. I don't put anything past her anymore...
10Poor boys! I feel really sorry for the kids. They should be off limits to all these gossip mags!
11Okay I see it now Sean Preston is a cutie patootie.
12cute kids but honestly they dont look like the same kids on both covers LOL
13take them away while there's still time!! She's going to have a severe effect on their mental health, and it's OBVIOUS... why are they still with her??
14I really hope it's not true, but these days, nothing she does actually surprises me. And her picture on the cover of US Weekly is something else...scary!
15I feel so bad for those boys. Britney is N0T FIT to be a mother. What the hell was she thinking?! Those kids should be taken away from her...dumb b*tch.
16Sean is adorable !!! cutie !!!
17these covers are a little much....i'm having a hard time believe these stories. i know she's far from mother of the year but these stories are pretty outrageous. i wonder who their "source close to britney" is...
18SP looks JUST like Brit's mother in that picture on the left. If these stories are true, that makes me so sad for those poor little boys.
19Wait...why does the cover talk about a Brad and Angie split?? Are they not together anymore??
20SPF is cute. JJ has some wonky eye going on in the US Weekly cover.
21Justme I think they're talking hypothetically.
22Oh ok. I figured Pop would be ALLLLLLLLL over that if it were even a breath of a rumour...
23Sad. Poor babies, I think their photos should not be on magazine covers. These boys are paying for their mommies "crimes". How can they have a "normal" life if the media hounds them??? The photo should of been of Brit, not the boys.
24E
Sad thing is I can almost believe these stories, based on her recent actions.
25Gosh, WHY do they need to put the kids on the cover like that? I know their mom's crazy, but it seems a bit insensitive and unfair for the kids.
26Can I adopt these kids please?????!!!!
27How depressing!
28sean is so flipping adorable, cutest celeb baby
29i just don't believe any of this, us weekly lost all it's credibility when they made up that 'shiloh poopy diaper' veitnam story, so i definately think they made up,'get my babies whiter teeth', she's crazy but this is silly, no one gets their kids taken away for putting soda in their bottle, too much drama and not much of a real story, go after brook sheelds, she's said she does not like spending time with her kids and that she likes her husband more that her kids, theres a bad mother for you, leave britney alone.
30This really sucks for all involved. Poor kids having a whacked out mother, but KFed isn't father of the year to his boys or girls either. Why those two procreated is beyond me...
31Choo-choo= trainwreck.
32i dont think any of those are true though.
33but britney's behavior certainly isnt helping... she's fuelling the press to conceive more cock and bull stories like these.
Why not put the boys on the cover, after all, doesn't Brit call the paps when she is out with them? She is trying to prove she is a good mom, but she is soooo crazy and childish! Make you question a God, when good people cannot have babies and this piece of trash pops them out like clowns leaving the clown car. Seriously, what is the child protection service in California doing? Are they just ignoring her????
341 - I do believe that she gives them soda.
2 - I do believe that when her babies cry she gives them to someone else
3 - The lollippos story.... not so much...
35These mags are getting to be like the Enquirer...
I do not agree with the kids being plastered on the covers like this... very trashy.
When I was a young/new mother, I didn't know a lot of things either, but I didn't have the money to hire a nanny to teach me either... which is what Brit needs to do.
I know people that give soda to their kids too, although I would not. If when they got older they wanted some, it would be a treat and non caffeine.
Way back when my kids were small (10+ years) it wasn't unheard of to have the kid get mommy's smokes or daddy a beer, these days it's unheard of.
Brit may have grown up like this and is doing what she saw her mother do and what others have seen their mothers do...
Come on Brit - wake up and get someone to teach you what is correct these days.
36I do think it's wrong to put their pictures on. Why not just Britney's with the same headlines?
And the lollipops thing is just WRONG.
37Take them away from her.
38Hmmm....
Life&Style should do better than putting babies on their covers with that topic.
Poor celeb kids, I think of them when they grow up and understands how public they already are. It's a pity.
39I've always noticed that the boys look sad all the time. I think that they need of a haircut, I know it's hard to do that when they are little (I know I have four boys, one I had to cut his curls b/c everyone thought he was a girl!) but she needs to do basic care for these kids. I know the system makes it hard to take children from a mother but something needs to be done. Soon.
40oh_it's_me ~ what Shiloh vietnam story are you talking about? I read US Weekly and I don't remember that one...
Who knows if all these stories are true but Britney's behavior has been so strange for the last year + that I wouldn't put anything past her...
41I was wondering the same MissBardot!
42I believe the soda story too!! I remember seeing pics when Sean was just a couple of months old and she was always carrying a bottle with juice in it. Who gives juice to an infant? Does her son's doctor not talk to her about what each stage of development requires for their health?
43These stories sound way too fabricated! i mean kick her while she's down eh?? there must be some truth to the story but it sounds so over the top!.....and putting her kids on the covers for sales?? disgraceful!
But Britney has paved the way for all the bull she's getting.........made your bed...lie in it....
44I may think Britney is nuts but I think the tabloids just want to sell their crap for people to read. So they blow normal stuff out of proportion. Those kids are spoiled rotten and have a better lifestyle than most kids. They don't look like they are being starved or abused like so many kids. They live a life of luxury, nice clothes, and have bodyguards when they go anywhere, while a good part of the nation's kids live in poverty. So no, they don't need help, that should not be printed on the magazine. They aren't the first kids to drink soda while outside? In the real world I see alot of mother's dangling their cigarettes right into their kids faces while they lie in the carriage. The headlines sound so stupid sometimes, making it seem like something is wrong, there is alot more wrong in the real world.
45I feel so sorry for those kids, I hate what their mom is doing to them, and what the media is doing to them....get them off the covers!!
46where any of these storys are true or not I think its clear that Brit is in WAY over her head w/ these boys. She is too selfish to give up it being "all about her" to care for her boys. She needs to understand that when you have kids, the world doesn't revolve around you anymore.
I had a very good friend who was the same way & her daughter was taken by DSS for a little while.
And
at "will Brad ger Shiloh?" What, is she a piece of furniture now?
47I don't know if I believe that stuff. It just sounds way too out there.
48thats so wrong
49*whether
50Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.