As if Mel Gibson needed another reason to leave the neighborhood, K-Fed now has a new lady in his life. Kevin is all smiles with his new friend, a baby pit bull. Britney and Kevin have made life so unbearable for their famous neighbor, Mel Gibson, that he had to put his house up for sale. Apparently all the chaos with the paparazzi, police visits, and fans following Britney's every move have pushed them over the edge. Mel has put his $18 million mansion on the market. Here's more:

A source tells Australian newspaper the Sydney Daily Telegraph, "People are always hanging around outside the gates and he is worried his kids might get hurt."
Gibson, his wife Robyn and their seven children are moving to a new home set on a ranch in the foothills of the Santa Monica Mountains.
The new location is reportedly closer to the $3.7 million Catholic church he has built.
Another better pic of Kevin's new bitch so read more
















I had to comment here because I can't help but be offended by the ignorance people has over the "American Pit bull Terrier" and the other breeds that are referred to as pit bulls.
here is some info so you guys get a little informed. Please do not make generalizations on a breed you don't even have experience with. It is not just about what you hear or one person experienced be it your neighboor, friend, coworwer etc
Do research, learn about the breed history, standard, temperament. They are one of the most lovable dogs in the world, so learn about them before you jump onto conclusions.
just for the sake of informational purposes, I will quote some of their statistics. For a thirty year period, there were about 238 deaths from dogs, and there were 36 breeds responsible. Pit bull type dogs and rottweilers represented over half that number, with german shepherds coming in third. There were even small dogs on the list, such as daschunds, pomeranians, and west highland white terriers, some of which had more than one listed death.
The percentage of pits and rotts responsible for deaths might seem high, but when you look at all the dog breeds capable of killing someone outside of freak accidents, there are only a few that can accomplish that, and considering that over half the population of dogs are small breeds, that only leaves a few breeds that even COULD contribute. Of course they will represent a high percentage compared to other dogs because of their strength alone. It is common sense that if you had 200 unstable chihuahuas and one unstable doberman that the doberman may very well end up responsible for 100% of the serious attacks, if not close to 100, even if the chi's and doberman attack the same amount of times.
When looking at the top three dog registries' numbers along with information from animal welfare organizations, you find that "pit bull" type dogs are one of the most popular, representing close to ten percent of the entire dog population (about four to six million out of the sixty to seventy five million dogs alive). They are right behind labs and goldens. It would stand to reason that if they are so high in number, and if it was really a breed problem, that there would be a large number of human fatalities due to them. However, since their rise in popularity, the average number of human deaths each year has not risen.
For the last thirty years, it has stayed between 15 and 26, although the breeds responsible for the most change almost annually. For the last few years, rottweilers have killed more people than pit bulls, but it doesn't mean they are somehow worse dogs than they were a few years ago. It may mean that they are more popular, or that a certain amount of people have them for the wrong reasons due to their strength and reputation.
If there really are four to six million "pit bulls" in this country, why is it that only 0.000002 percent of them are giving the entire breed a bad name? After all, 99.999998 percent of them, literally millions of them, never did anything wrong. Shouldn't it be more like four to six million deaths or maulings? It would be, if it was a breed problem. No, unfortunately it isn't that simple.
Another interesting tidbit is that of all the attacks (approximately 4.7 million a year), 80 to 90 percent of them, no matter the breed, are done by un-neutered males. That says a lot about what is really driving the "bad" dogs. If these dogs had owners that cared enough about them to give them the snip, perhaps four million, two hundred thirty thousand people would never have been attacked, and anywhere from 11 to 25 people may still be alive every year.
Any of this can be found on the CDC's website, goodpooch.com, and the websites for the AKC, UKC, and ADBA.
spread the word that these dogs are not the monsters the media would have you believe they are.
1