January Jones continues to defy expectations in these new, very sultry outtakes from her November GQ cover story. Clad in white underwear and red pumps, January drives home the fact that she's no Betty Draper in real life. Although January and her hot bod can totally pull off this look, tell us — are these shots super sexy or just too much?
Photos courtesy of Terry Richardson/GQ.com
gorgeous and refreshing! love the red heels and the cute kitty
1the heels and lips are a fiery red, great contrast with her pale skin. The cat on the other hand... poor thing looks like a deer in headlights lol. Meow...
2the outtakes look better than the ones in the magazine. But the photographer has put her in some really robotic looking poses. The overall shoot is dull, despite her being in lingerie.
3These look so photoshopped. She doesn't have that small a body: hips, stomach, etc.
4I'd call it 'desperate'. Tramp's been done to death...what's there to comment on? Posing in undies or bikinis is lazy and boring. And it's a testament to GQ that men 'must' still be hard-ons waiting to happen because their brains can't possibly be stimulated by a woman.
5Bullsh*t!!
She looks gorgeous and yes, she really is that small.
6her acting is really good in this seasons' mad men.
7Ehh.. whatever
8Yah, she looks gorgeous. Is the bra and panty thing tired, definitely. But so are photos of women in hot dresses against a white background..but they are timeless and usually beautiful.
January is definitely that small or did you not see her at the Emmys..
9I like it. It's a little more artistic and edgy than most photoshoots for men's magazines.
10January is very pretty but I don't like the photographs. The lighting is all wrong. They look way too plastic and don't capture anything in her eyes. She looks vacant. She usually radiates a subtle intensity on Mad Men.
11she has the same expression in every single photo. from the cover to the last page. sad because she is stunning
12I love it that she is as pale as me and still is considered sexy.
13The pic of her on the bed is fine, but the one on the left is boring and reminds me of that Fiona Apple video.
14looks like a plastic doll (blow up kind not barbie).... too bad most men's mags still think all men like prepubescent boy bodies
15What else is new? Posing in underwear, red lipstick, blond hair. Boooooring!She doesn't looks sexy at all, in fact she's rather average looking
16DLeigh, I agree! I think one reason why we're even asking ourselves if this is too maked is because she's not tan and she doesn't have ridiculous implants. It's not 'diversity', and none of us can argue that it's a revelatory idea for a photo shoot, but at least it's a different look.
17sorry, *naked* instead of maked.
18love them. except for the cat. poor thing looks scared to death
19Looks gorgeous.
20What is that underwear set?! I must have ittt!
there is nothing sexy about these photos.
21Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.