January Jones's Sultry GQ November 2009 Issue Outtakes

January Jones For GQ Outtakes — Super Sexy or Too Much?

October 21, 2009

January Jones continues to defy expectations in these new, very sultry outtakes from her November GQ cover story. Clad in white underwear and red pumps, January drives home the fact that she's no Betty Draper in real life. Although January and her hot bod can totally pull off this look, tell us — are these shots super sexy or just too much?

Photos courtesy of Terry Richardson/GQ.com

Pop Poll GQ January Jones

24 Comments

Loren02 3 years 29 weeks

there is nothing sexy about these photos.

Jennipoo 3 years 29 weeks

Looks gorgeous. What is that underwear set?! I must have ittt!

Jennipoo 3 years 29 weeks

Looks gorgeous. What is that underwear set?! I must have ittt!

snarkypants 3 years 29 weeks

love them. except for the cat. poor thing looks scared to death

Isabella Thorpe 3 years 29 weeks

sorry, *naked* instead of maked.

Isabella Thorpe 3 years 29 weeks

DLeigh, I agree! I think one reason why we're even asking ourselves if this is too maked is because she's not tan and she doesn't have ridiculous implants. It's not 'diversity', and none of us can argue that it's a revelatory idea for a photo shoot, but at least it's a different look.

3 years 29 weeks

What else is new? Posing in underwear, red lipstick, blond hair. Boooooring!She doesn't looks sexy at all, in fact she's rather average looking

3 years 29 weeks

looks like a plastic doll (blow up kind not barbie).... too bad most men's mags still think all men like prepubescent boy bodies

3 years 29 weeks

The pic of her on the bed is fine, but the one on the left is boring and reminds me of that Fiona Apple video.

dleighl 3 years 29 weeks

I love it that she is as pale as me and still is considered sexy.

3 years 29 weeks

she has the same expression in every single photo. from the cover to the last page. sad because she is stunning

3 years 29 weeks

January is very pretty but I don't like the photographs. The lighting is all wrong. They look way too plastic and don't capture anything in her eyes. She looks vacant. She usually radiates a subtle intensity on Mad Men.

sourcherry 3 years 29 weeks

I like it. It's a little more artistic and edgy than most photoshoots for men's magazines.

Briandiesel 3 years 29 weeks

Yah, she looks gorgeous. Is the bra and panty thing tired, definitely. But so are photos of women in hot dresses against a white background..but they are timeless and usually beautiful. January is definitely that small or did you not see her at the Emmys..

Briandiesel 3 years 29 weeks

PhillyEagles1 3 years 29 weeks

Ehh.. whatever

PhillyEagles1 3 years 29 weeks

Ehh.. whatever

chocolate79 3 years 29 weeks

her acting is really good in this seasons' mad men.

Amesabelle 3 years 29 weeks

She looks gorgeous and yes, she really is that small.

3 years 29 weeks

I'd call it 'desperate'. Tramp's been done to death...what's there to comment on? Posing in undies or bikinis is lazy and boring. And it's a testament to GQ that men 'must' still be hard-ons waiting to happen because their brains can't possibly be stimulated by a woman. Bullsh*t!!

3 years 29 weeks

These look so photoshopped. She doesn't have that small a body: hips, stomach, etc.

12345678910111213 3 years 29 weeks

the outtakes look better than the ones in the magazine. But the photographer has put her in some really robotic looking poses. The overall shoot is dull, despite her being in lingerie.

Nassira 3 years 29 weeks

the heels and lips are a fiery red, great contrast with her pale skin. The cat on the other hand... poor thing looks like a deer in headlights lol. Meow...

3 years 29 weeks

gorgeous and refreshing! love the red heels and the cute kitty

Link Love

24 Comments

You Might Also Like