Photos of Emma Roberts in Underwear For GQ

Emma Roberts For GQ — Tasteful or Too Much Too Soon?

March 24, 2009

It's hard to believe it's been almost two years since we were asking you all if Emma Roberts was the biggest star of tomorrow. Now she's 18 and apparently ready for more grownup projects — like this photo shoot for GQ. It's hard not to think of Emma as Julia's young niece, so tell us what you think of these photos — tasteful or too much?

Pop Poll Emma Roberts

66 Comments

2 years

i don't seee how sex can be distracting. i mean, isnt sex the only reason why women and mens bodies alike are made to be attractive to the other gender? without sexual attraction, humans could not even exist because people would feel no need to have sex with someone or something that does attract them.

Michaelrcks 4 years

EW!

Michaelrcks 4 years

EW!

Rina92 4 years

she looks so pretty though...

Rina92 4 years

she looks so pretty though...

angelinemarie 4 years

weird, i didnt know we were the same age... i thought she was younger than me. still, this is awkward

angelinemarie 4 years

weird, i didnt know we were the same age...i thought she was younger than me.still, this is awkward

chikaloka 4 years

I love Emma Roberts and think she is gorgeous, but this is too much too soon. She's so young, barely legal and already fulfilling the pedo-fantasies of GQ readers....EWWWW!!!!

genesisrocks 4 years

It's probably a good career choice for her if she doesn't wanna be stuck in the cutesy tween roles forever. At least she hasn't totally destroyed her image a la Lindsay Lohan.

laellavita 4 years

my only problem with it is that it is a complete 180 from how she used to portray herself, as a teenage role model to girls who was just in a movie like hotel for dogs, and now she's stripping down. sure, you can't see anything, but it's suggesting a whole lot. she JUST turned 18 and 40-50 year old men look at this magazine, when their daughters will be looking up to her in teenbeat

mariejoeyjacobs 4 years

SHES SO PRETTY!! I like her :D

mariejoeyjacobs 4 years

SHES SO PRETTY!! I like her :D

ThePerfectScore 4 years

They are not inappropriate. But she looks dumb as Hell. Why is she looking to the side with such a vacant expression?

nikecold 4 years

Considering that those twin who posed for playboy on The Girls Next Door were 18 back when they did that i'll say its ok. And sandy I agree but these seem alright to me.

sandy82 4 years

I'm tired of seeing women's photos sexed up in some way. What ever happened to being classy?

sidra5397 4 years

*sexuality

sidra5397 4 years

*sexuality

sidra5397 4 years

Her bottoms look more like some ugly shorts more than anything. I just think it's annoying that the moment some of these starlets and stars (I'm talking to you Zac Efron!) hit a certain age they have to throw out some random looking photo that's supposed show how mature they've become by emphasizing their sexulitiy. We get it that you're young and hot... I've got no problem with sexy photoshoots... just ones that are trying too hard to prove something (You too Zac!)... Also, it's creepy that the photos are in a men's magazine. It's like they just couldn't wait until she hit 18 so that it would be alright to start gawking at her...

juicebox07 4 years

There is nothing wrong with these photos. Now if you could kind of see her nipples through her shirt... well, that would be another story.

ansoliz 4 years

She looks cute. There have been much worse from much younger girls.

ohbaby7 4 years

shes 18! shes showing less skin that the girls in shape and fitness, and for a shoot in GQ- its definitely tasteful. Props to her for not begin afraid to venture beyond Disneyworld

msshellokitty 4 years

i think that it's inappropriate.she just turned 18 and i don't understand why these girls think posing in these men's magazines make that grown up.it's kind of icky because she looks like a teenager and not like a woman.