Skip Nav
Rami Malek
32 Pictures of Rami Malek That Will Show You Why Everyone Is Suddenly Crushing on Him
Celebrity Babies
Victoria Beckham Has the Support of Her Ridiculously Good-Looking Family at NYFW
Viral Videos
Justin Timberlake and Alfonso Ribeiro Do "The Carlton" Dance, Again

Like Mother, Like Daughter

Looks like Cindy's beautiful baby girl, Kaya may be taking after her mother when it comes to modeling. Let's hope she doesn't do anything too sexy since she is only 5. The 40 year old mom is currently battling rumors about using Botox or even going under the knife to stay young. The rumors began as a result of an article in Gala Magazine. Now Cindy may be looking to sue the source. Page Six reports:

Her spokesman said: "Cindy Crawford has retained legal counsel to investigate the publication of a fictitious 'interview' in French Gala magazine. Ms. Crawford never participated in any such interview. The interview contained false and defamatory statements."


image

image

image

image

Source

Around The Web
Cindy Crawford's Best Model Moments
Cindy Crawford Retiring From Modeling
Celebrity Mother Daughter Duos of 2015
Cindy Crawford Talks George Clooney on Conan O'Brien

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

Join The Conversation
Imabeliever Imabeliever 9 years
dovima.. only the one pic goes too far. the tattoo on her back the necklace and the smile combined = lack of innocence. the pic takes her innocence away and actually presents her in a sexual manner. and what I find disturbing as a parent is that Cindy allowed a photographer/friend to manipulate this pose/photo and that she didn't see anything wrong with it. Childhood doesn't last as long these days as when we were children.. it has been shortened.. children lose their innocence at a younger age.. we should be trying to protect it as long as we can ...not objectify girls this young. Im a believer in the power of BAMZS!
dovima dovima 9 years
or turned on
dovima dovima 9 years
not a big deal you have to be perverted to be offened by that.
blOndiE7 blOndiE7 9 years
hmmm...I wouldnt want my daughter posing like that in a magazine at that age..
playsindirt playsindirt 9 years
It's a shame we even have to have this conversation. Twenty years ago no one would care. I can remember running around in the sprinklers without my top at that age and nobody gave it a 2nd thought. But yes, Cindy should know better.
sarahlynn sarahlynn 9 years
the other pics are not as badbut the topless one is just not right!
crazycali81 crazycali81 9 years
so i hope none of you let your children run around in just a diaper. because if you do then you are just as bad as you are saying Cindy is. there are plenty of gross people at the beach waiting to catch a glimpse of your little girl in just a diaper. so before you go judging someone else make sure you think about what you do in your life that could be putting your own child in danger of a sexual predator.
Faye16 Faye16 9 years
Ugh, the picture of the kid posing with her back to the camera, showing a tramp stamp, holding her boobs, is soooo wrong. It's exploitation. And I agree, children are innocent, they shouldn't be sexualised, it's disturbing. The other photos are okay, I guess.
mmm_humus mmm_humus 9 years
that girl's beautiful! but they made her act like too sexy. Kids should just be kids, running around, laughing and playing. Not posing topless.
1Knight 1Knight 9 years
These photos are just a little too disturbing...!
WisCaliGirl WisCaliGirl 9 years
Beautiful child - But then again, so was JonBenet Ramsey....
jaclynn jaclynn 9 years
Yeah, they're definitely being published.. The first picture is wrong on so many levels and wtf, why would they give her a tramp stamp. It's not as suggestive as her moms, but they're still very similar.. Cindy and Papa Joe should date.
jennifer76 jennifer76 9 years
This is really disturbing to me. I have no problem whatsoever with young girls in bikinis or even topless - when they are doig YOUNG GIRL THINGS. Posing in seductive poses is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.
teddybear teddybear 9 years
I think she is so cute. I love her hair. I think little girl's should not have to wear tops. They are not developed and basically look like little boys. The sad thing is they can't because of the sick child molestors out there. It's a sad world.
mar mar 9 years
does anyone know if these are going to be published? Maybe they are personal pics that were not supposed to make the net. If that were the case, I really do not think it's a big deal.
honey31 honey31 9 years
I agree with you sexyvegan its so wrong and the tatoo is stupid on a child!
sexyvegan sexyvegan 9 years
That topless picture is sick. There is NO reason a child should have taken a suggestive pose like that let alone with a fake tattoo on her back.
SaRaH-22 SaRaH-22 9 years
I think that all of the other pictures are cute except for the topless one...but overall, very cute lil kid!
TNgirl TNgirl 9 years
I think that Cindy's daughter is very cute. However, like most other posters I agree that these photos are too suggestive.
TruJrzyGirl TruJrzyGirl 9 years
What's this world coming to ... Isn't she sort of young for this pose, and with a tramp stamp as well ???? I'm sure she is the object of every pedofilers out there !!!!! Bad move on Cindy and Randi Gerber's part .... Too young for that !
L7amiguita L7amiguita 9 years
This just makes me very sad. What has the world come to? Children posing in this sort of way is just sick! These pictures shouldn't even be up...too many weirdos out there. Your childhood years are a time when kids should JUST BE KIDS. Why are some parents so eager to get their kids in acting, modeling, etc. It is so unfair for the children, they are forced to grow up so quickly.
t0xxic t0xxic 9 years
Pad I totally agree. Her priorities are screwed up on this one. Im sueing you bc u say negative things about me, but at the same time Im blasting my not fully dressed 5 year old with a tat on her back and thats ok. Im also glad that most of us seem to agree.
t0xxic t0xxic 9 years
Shes a beautiful little girl and taking pics like for the immediate family or her scrap book sure. But no way in hell would my little girls face be over the internet in this way. This is highly inapproprete (sp)imo. And no way would my 5 year old wear a fake tat on her back either. The other pics are fine very cute, but the copy cat of mom shes a tad to young for. Who cares if cindy gets botox or whatever shes old she can do that she earned it.
momwith2cuties momwith2cuties 9 years
HS28, I think the legal part is about a magazine saying Cindy has used Botox, not about the daughters pics, if I read the post right. As far as the pics are concerned I think the topless one was a poor decision on Cindy's part. It's not the fact that she's topless. The problem lies within the pose. She looks like she's imitating an SI swimsuit issue! There's nothing wrong with adults posing like this, but as moms I think we should try to teach our daughters that they are not a piece of meat. It's clear that the pose is a sexy one. I want my daughter to have a high self esteem but she doesn't have to go topless & pose sexy to have it. The pic would have been more suited for her age if she were just playing on the beach.
Padraigin Padraigin 9 years
She's not suing because of the inappropriatly suggestive nature of these photos. She's suing because someone claimed she had plastic surgery. Talk about f-ed up priorities.
Latest Celebrity
X