Skip Nav
scream queens
Meet Every New and Returning Cast Member For the Second Season of Scream Queens
Music
Who Is Maren Morris? Get to Know Country's Next Big Thing
Fifty Shades of Grey
The Best of the Best Instagram Snaps From the Fifty Shades Films

Breaking Dawn Movie Review

Breaking Dawn Part 1: Horrifying on Multiple Levels

Let's be honest: the standards for Breaking Dawn Part 1 are not high. All we want as fans is a satisfying conclusion to an addictive guilty pleasure, and considering the titillating content of the fourth book (Wedding! Sex! Hybrid vampire baby!), the film version has to do very little to please its audience. Sadly, it feels like Part 1 is grossly imbalanced; certain aspects are lazy while other scenes are over the top. Though Breaking Dawn has the most theatrical elements of all the movies, the film is disappointing — and often, just plain bad.

The movie begins with Edward and Bella's wedding, and then we follow them on a honeymoon full of passion — and problems. The couple manages to have sex for the first time, but Edward's vampiric strength leaves bruises all over Bella's body. After they overcome that hurdle, Bella faces another one when she makes the classic mistake of eschewing birth control because she's assumed her vampire mate is shooting blanks. He's not, though, and Bella's suddenly pregnant, but no one is quite sure what's growing inside her. Science and legend have no explanation, but everyone can see that Bella is getting weaker by the second. Unless Edward can turn her into a vampire during childbirth, she may be gone forever. It's a pretty wild premise that was shocking to read, and even crazier to see — and not in a good way. To read about my issues with the film, just keep reading.

Where The Twilight Saga films have been almost chaste with gore and violence, Breaking Dawn doesn't hold back. As the baby grows at a rapid pace, Bella soon learns that her body can't handle the fetus. As it begins killing her from the inside, things get really gruesome: she's drinking blood, her bones are breaking, and her body is emaciated. These are disturbing visuals that could have benefited from being a little less loyal to the book. I found myself wanting to cover my eyes and wondering why certain scenes had to be so graphic.

The script is even more cringe-worthy than the carnage. I expected much of the dialogue to be cheesy, but Breaking Dawn outdoes itself. I'm willing to forgive the sticky-sweet declarations of love that come with marriage and everlasting devotion and all that (the girlie part of me genuinely enjoys that anyway), but many of the lines are so poorly written that they make the bad acting even more awful.

While the Twilight films generally seem to improve from one to the next, director Bill Condon tries to up the ante with some elements that didn't necessarily need fixing. A prime example: the werewolves' ability to talk to each other telepathically. None of the other directors attempted to portray this before, and I assume it's because they realized that it would be a laughable mistake. That point is proven with Breaking Dawn, and the extended scene of wolf-talk is pure ridiculousness.

The imprinting scene is similarly atrocious, but I realize there's only so far that you can stray from the source material. The novel certainly deserves part of the blame for Breaking Dawn's faults, but the adaptation fails in places that have nothing to do with the book. The score is weak, and the makeup and hair dye are worse than ever (I don't even know why they pretend that Jasper, Carlisle, and Rosalie are blonds anymore).

I had hoped that by the fourth film, we'd be getting the best adaptation in the Twilight series, but Breaking Dawn Part 1 is a roller coaster that starts as a dreamy fantasy for two beloved characters and devolves into a bloody mess.


Photos courtesy of Summit Entertainment

Around The Web
Join The Conversation
karenakamimi karenakamimi 4 years
I don't know what's wrong with some of you people. Have you even seen the movie? EVERYBODY I know who has seen Breaking Dawn has loved the movie. Maybe most of the comments are from jealous people.
karenakamimi karenakamimi 4 years
i saw the breaking dawn movie and it was awesome!!!! I loved it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JennyV12 JennyV12 4 years
chel marie we share the same thought about harry potter that is a great saga in books and in movies and twilight is just good on books 'cause in movies suck!
aaaaaaadina aaaaaaadina 4 years
I like BD movie much more then Potter
Asfandancer Asfandancer 4 years
I enjoyed the first book but after that the whole series got dumber and dumber. Breaking Dawn was an awful book and I can only imagine what a train wreck of a film it will be. I have no intention of seeing it. As for Harry Potter being for kids, you have to be kidding me it is one of the best fantasy series of all time that appeals to all ages. I'm in my 60's and I love the Harry Potter books and movies.
ChelMarie ChelMarie 4 years
@Katie...you can't be serious? Harry Potter is far more than a series for children. Its themes and overall message carries more reach than any other fantasy series (besides perhaps Tolkien). Just because something might be marketed towards younger people doesn't mean it holds less weight or that it can't be entertaining to older people. I say that as someone in her early 20s. Anyways, I'm a big fan of the first three "Twilight" books (I was pretty obsessive and HIGHLY anticipated the first film). Saw the first movie and was utterly horrified. I love the book series but I feel like a lot of "fans" are lemmings about it and love the movies for the heck of it---even though they aren't even 5% as good as the books. Bad acting-----bad everything.
genesisrocks genesisrocks 4 years
I've pretty much only watched the Twilight movies for the camp factor, so the fact that this is bad kinda makes me want to watch it
steen steen 4 years
When I first read the novels way back when, I was on the fence about them but "Breaking Dawn" was just so completely ridiculous. I honestly didn't think they would put the story in film but they did! The whole thing is hilarious to me.
katie225 katie225 4 years
it doesn't matter which is the better fantasy series, larisa, they're BOTH FOR KIDS/TEENS. thus, they should be left for the kiddies.
larisa5656 larisa5656 4 years
I'm ashamed to admit this, but I'm kind of glad that this first half of the Twilight finale is so bad. Its often said that you find out the true notoriety of things in their final act. Thus, this "horrifying" adaptation, as you put it, just goes to show that Harry Potter, and will forever be, the better fantasy series.
Gdeeaz Gdeeaz 4 years
I am pleasantly surprised that you didn't give this a glowing review. There has always seemed to be a bit of a twilight obsession among the writers on here and I thought you would give it a glowing review no matter how bad it was. I will gladly admit I was wrong. I have been reading reviews and it amazes me how the die hard fans are rating this 5/5 or 10/10.
Robert Pattinson, Clothing Designer? Believe It
Twilight Character Poll
Teen Choice Awards Pictures
Actors Who Were Almost Cast in Fifty Shades of Grey
Weddings With Movie Themes
Before They Were Stars: Twilight and New Moon

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

From Our Partners
Latest Entertainment
X