Skip Nav
Movie Trailers
Colin Farrell Either Finds a Lover or Turns Into a Lobster in His New Movie
Beyonce Knowles
Here Are the Details of Beyoncé's "Formation" World Tour!
Matt Damon
Bourne Is Back! Watch the Trailer For the Fifth Jason Bourne Movie, Starring Matt Damon
Around The Web
Good News: We Tracked Down Natalie Portman's Gorgeous Deep Red Lipstick
Sexy Ashton Kutcher Pictures
Natalie Portman Talks About Star Wars: The Force Awakens
Pictures of Celebrities at Super Bowl Games
Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher at the Madonna Concert in LA
Natalie Portman, Jimmy Fallon, and Sia "Iko Iko" Video
Pictures of Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel's Baby Silas

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

Join The Conversation
laug89 laug89 4 years
ive seen both movies, and i gotta say that friends with bennefits is better in every way, it is funnier, smarter, and the soundtrack is amazing on top of it, whereas no strings attached is just too cheesey and the characters just dont have as much chemistry.
darcicomplex darcicomplex 4 years
The TV spots and trailers have me really excited to see Friends With Benefits - the riffing between Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis is reallly hilarious, although I hope they didn't just pull out all the funny parts for the ads... I especially liked the spot that had "Love In America" by JTX, I love the playful synth lines, hope I hear the song in the actual movie, too ( watch at http://vimeo.com/26184095 )
emilywhaaat emilywhaaat 4 years
It's funny why the directors decided to release these movies at almost the same time when they have more or less the same plot. If I were to choose, I think I'd pick out Ashton and Natalie. But I think that Friends With Benefits have more funny moments than No Strings Attached. I'm thinking of watching one of these movies with my long distance boyfriend (http://www.longdistancerelationshipsadvice.net).
littlemunchkin littlemunchkin 4 years
#4 I agree - will be interesting to see the difference between how a female directs a film on this subject and a male.
awesomepants awesomepants 4 years
Justin Timberlake ruins movies. He's not charming on screen and he's one of those people who has a big head because a couple of people told him he was funny.
baileydancerr baileydancerr 4 years
I love that its Ashton kutcher and Mila kunis from that's 70's show.
baileydancerr baileydancerr 4 years
I love that its Ashton kutcher and Mila kunis from that's 70's show.
indiegirl66 indiegirl66 5 years
Hi all-look, before Justin & Mila & Ashton & Natalie, the indie world did it first with a terrific young cast out of New York. FRIENDS (WITH BENEFITS) went on to win tons of awards at film festivals around the country. Check it out. Oh, and if you watch closely you'll catch the cameo of the hot young actress currently working on her dragon tattoo... http://www.babelgum.com/4024119/friends-with-benefits.html
indiegirl66 indiegirl66 5 years
Hi all-look, before Justin & Mila & Ashton & Natalie, the indie world did it first with a terrific young cast out of New York. FRIENDS (WITH BENEFITS) went on to win tons of awards at film festivals around the country. Check it out. Oh, and if you watch closely you'll catch the cameo of the hot young actress currently working on her dragon tattoo...http://www.babelgum.com/4024119/friends-with-benefits.html
lizlee89 lizlee89 5 years
here's another distinction - one stupid; the others stupider (that's right; I said "stupider" - that's how stupid not only the concepts of both these movies are but, even worse, the concept of the identical concepts and releasing them at the same time). although I think "Friends with Benefits" actually looks like it could have some funny moments (maybe because I find Mila Kunis and Justin Timberlake much more likable that Natalie Portman and Ashton Kutcher)...
Burkina Burkina 5 years
There is something so off puting about Mila Kunis's eyes.
Latest Entertainment
X