Skip Nav
Award Season
The 2016 MTV VMA Nominations Are Here!
Movie Casting
Get Pumped For Justice League With the Official Cast
The Vampire Diaries
Sink Your Teeth Into These Juicy Details About The Vampire Diaries' Final Season

The Social Network Movie Review Starring Jesse Eisenberg, Andrew Garfield, and Justin Timberlake

The Social Network: A Sharp Sign of the Times

It's an odd thing to realize the film you're watching is the one that may end up defining your generation, but that's the case with The Social Network, the David Fincher film inspired by the founding of Facebook. Set in 2003-04, when Mark Zuckerberg (played by Jesse Eisenberg) put the plans in motion for the ultra-popular website, it almost seems like an event too recent to dramatize. However, screenwriter Aaron Sorkin does so much with his whip-smart script that the film transcends its own label of merely being "the Facebook movie."

The Social Network is the mirror held up to our current Internet-driven culture, and as users of the ubiquitous site (500 million members and counting), we might all think we already know plenty. But the combination of Fincher's usual expertise and Sorkin's writing makes the story fascinating.

To find out why I think The Social Network is a must see, just

.

We meet Zuckerberg on the Harvard campus in 2003, and once he alienates his girlfriend via his personality and his blog, he starts putting together the digital pieces for Facebook. He lands in trouble for hacking into Harvard's computer system and crashing it with his first venture but attracts the attention of his fellow students, including a couple of wealthy twins (both played by Armie Hammer) who want to use Zuckerberg's skills for their own website. Fast forward a couple of years, and the narrative of the Facebook genesis is retold through two lawsuits — one brought on by those twins and one from his former friend and original cofounder Eduardo Saverin (Andrew Garfield).

Through these flashbacks, we find out how eventual billionaire Mark became the target for litigation, as well as his motivation for success. Through Sorkin's words and Eisenberg's fine portrayal, he's presented as a twitchy boy genius who's actually not so concerned with money or getting to the top — he just wants to be liked. To be clear, though, Sorkin's Mark barely garners sympathy by being a nerdy outsider; he's sarcastic and cutthroat, eventually utilizing his talents because he wants to be cool.

Facebook isn't just Mark's baby; Eduardo is the savvy, trusting best friend forced out of a company he helped build. In that role, Garfield is endearing and effective, and his performance is the most memorable. Justin Timberlake is adequate in his part of Svengali-ish Sean Parker, but his presence is more often a distraction than it is an asset to an otherwise outstanding film.

I can see why Sorkin was so intrigued by Facebook's beginnings, aside from its cultural relevance; it's the business of friendship that The Social Network revolves around, and how it's not always a beautiful — or real — thing.


Around The Web
Join The Conversation
kismekate kismekate 5 years
The film lost its interest to me when I heard Zuckerberg saying that firstly, he didn't agree to the film being made and that secondly, a large entirety of it is fiction. In the interview he did with the New York Times he seems almost pissed off at Sorkin's fluff that came with the "true" story of the creation of his "baby". (All hearsay to him, as he said he wouldn't be seeing the movie) In my opinion, if you're going to make a film, especially one that is going to cement some sort of moment in our social and technological history, why not try and make it as historically accurate as possible? While I don't think the creators are claiming that it's 100% true, why not wait until there is some sort of agreement or consent with the character that you're basing an entire film on? I know that the movie is going to do well and I've heard that it really is great - I just hope people realize that it isn't 100% true and that Zuckerberg isn't made out to be someone he wasn't and isn't. I can't imagine if I were in his shoes and someone disrupted and invented my character and past without my permission.
kismekate kismekate 5 years
The film lost its interest to me when I heard Zuckerberg saying that firstly, he didn't agree to the film being made and that secondly, a large entirety of it is fiction. In the interview he did with the New York Times he seems almost pissed off at Sorkin's fluff that came with the "true" story of the creation of his "baby". (All hearsay to him, as he said he wouldn't be seeing the movie)In my opinion, if you're going to make a film, especially one that is going to cement some sort of moment in our social and technological history, why not try and make it as historically accurate as possible? While I don't think the creators are claiming that it's 100% true, why not wait until there is some sort of agreement or consent with the character that you're basing an entire film on? I know that the movie is going to do well and I've heard that it really is great - I just hope people realize that it isn't 100% true and that Zuckerberg isn't made out to be someone he wasn't and isn't. I can't imagine if I were in his shoes and someone disrupted and invented my character and past without my permission.
Bye Bye, Blondie! Rooney Mara Is Officially a Brunette Again
Jesse Eisenberg and Woody Allen Make a Good Team in Their New Film
Shiatzy Chen Runway Look Fall 2016
The Google Movie vs. the Facebook Movie
Andrew Garfield in Spider-Man GIFs
Jesse Eisenberg Asks Comic Fans About Batman vs. Superman

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

From Our Partners
Latest Entertainment
X