Skip Nav
Oscars
Fill Out Our Oscar Ballot For a Chance to Win $1,000!
Neil Patrick Harris
Meet the Cast of Netflix's A Series of Unfortunate Events Show
Steven Yeun
These New Quotes May Have Just Confirmed a Huge, Devastating Death on The Walking Dead

The Taking of Pelham 123: The Taking of Our Time, 104 Minutes

I wanted The Taking of Pelham 123 to be great, or at least kinda fun — full of thrills and interesting characters with a few little one-liners tossed in. Expecting too much? Maybe. But I was disappointed nonetheless because it turns out this movie is predictable and forgettable. It managed to keep my attention for a while, but mostly it's just blah.

For the most part, what you see in the trailers is what you get, in terms of plot: A crazy guy who wants to be called Ryder (John Travolta) hijacks a subway car in New York and he demands millions of dollars in exchange for the hostages' lives. He tells the dispatcher, Walter Garber (Denzel Washington), that the mayor (played a sleazy New Yorker to a "T") has one hour to get Ryder the money and for every minute they're late after the hour, he's going to kill a hostage. Ryder becomes attached to Garber and he forces Garber's secrets to come to light during their interactions, which everyone in the Garber's room can hear — including his boss and the mayor of New York. Ultimately Ryder wants Garber to deliver the money personally, and then we wait to see whether or not Garber can stop Ryder from continuing on with his plans once he gets the money. For more of my thoughts,

.

In attempts to make up for the lack of drama, or to fill in the gaps between the few genuinely tense moments, director Tony Scott favors fast-paced montages of crowded subway platforms and general New York "hustle and bustle." Zooming camera shots, blurry quick-moving figures alternate with "dramatic" slow-motion and close-ups on grim faces, all set to loud tunes like "99 Problems." Because, you know, Ryder is a tough guy. This is a tough guy's game because Jay-Z says so. At first, this distracts us from the fact that we don't really care much about this story, but that wears off as the movie wears on.

Denzel Washington often brings an elegance and gracefulness to his characters, and he always exhibits a calm control over his performances. We're supposed to like Walter Garber, and we do, but this entire thriller can't rest on this particular average Joe's shoulders, no matter how nicely Washington presents him. Garber's not all that compelling. Supposedly providing the jolts of craziness (and therefore, in this case, entertainment), is John Travolta who gets a few really good lines in but who mostly seems like he's impersonating a crazy person rather than inhabiting an actual character.

Theoretically this should be an excellent Summer movie — digestible, intriguing, exciting. But I can't recommend this for a theater-going experience. It'll probably be a pretty solid rental, if you're quite bored. I wanted to be swept up in the mystery of it all (why is Ryder doing this? How will he pull it off? How will they stop him?) and the tension of the situation, but really, it's a silly movie. In order to get swept up, I'd have to be able to take the movie seriously and it just wouldn't let me do that.


Photos courtesy of Sony Pictures

Around The Web
Denzel Washington's Impression of Jay Z | Video
Chloe Moretz and Denzel Washington Interview | The Equalizer
Famous Tony Award Winners
American Crime Story: The People v. OJ Simpson Cast | Video
American Crime Story Set Pictures
2 Guns Trailer
John Travolta's Son on Late Show With David Letterman

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

Join The Conversation
sloane220 sloane220 6 years
with technology today i didn't think they could make a plausible and interesting remake of this film and i think i was right. i live in new york city, so i eat this kind of stuff about the subway system (which is inconvienient and at the same time the fastest way to get around new york) for breakfast. if you really want to see something compelling watch the original film from the 1970's.
Allyace Allyace 6 years
I will not deny that Denzel Washington is a good actor, but I just feel like he has played this same sort of role way too many times...
Linda-McP Linda-McP 6 years
Added this to my Netflix wait list. I want to watch it, but on the cheap.
superstar2780 superstar2780 6 years
interesting, buzz ... the NY times gave this a pretty good review, but yours makes me wonder. I love denzel, even though he tends to make the same movie over and over these days. maybe I'll wait for this to reach my on-demand.
J-Rabbit J-Rabbit 6 years
Oh no. Thanks for the heads up. I'm definitely the type of person who gets bored easily with bad movies, so this is good to know.
pharm_chick pharm_chick 6 years
thats disappointing, since i really wanted to watch this
TidalWave TidalWave 6 years
i've never even heard of this movie
Latest Entertainment
X