Skip Nav
Food News
The First Pumpkin Spice Product Has Just Hit Store Shelves — Heaven Help Us
Fast and Easy
The Perfect Pasta Solution If You Don't Want to Fully Commit to Veggie Noodles
Summer
The 1 Thing I Always Put on Ice Cream to Make It Better (No, Not Sprinkles)

Are Inspectors to Blame For the Peanut Salmonella Outbreak?

While the company behind the peanut salmonella scare has been shut down, many people are still wondering who's really to blame for the ordeal. Was it the president of the Peanut Corporation of America, who knowingly sent contaminated goods to the stores? Or was it the government, who failed to detect that the production plants were in disgusting conditions?

According to a recent article by The New York Times, the guilty party could actually be the private inspectors who check and rate a plant's food safety level. An audit conducted by an inspector last March declared that the gross facility in Georgia had a food safety level of "superior." According to the FDA, however, the same plant had been plagued by salmonella for at least the past nine months. This isn't the first known case where a private inspector failed to properly monitor a food plant, the Times reports:

An examination of the largest food poisoning outbreaks in recent years — in products as varied as spinach, pet food, and a children’s snack, Veggie Booty — show that auditors failed to detect problems at plants whose contaminated products later sickened consumers.

Although I understand that food safety is an incredibly hard thing to oversee, I can't help but feel a little queasy about this news. I hope that after such a widespread contamination, changes are made to correct the system. How do you feel about the ordeal? Who do you blame for the outbreak?

Source

Around The Web
Join The Conversation
Spectra Spectra 7 years
The corporation itself should have its own internal QC department that does internal audits of the facility. In addition to that, an external auditor should come in on random audits throughout the year to double check to see that the corporation's QC is doing their jobs.
Kimpossible Kimpossible 7 years
I don't think the inspectors should carry sole responsibility but they should carry some that is for sure. I feel the same way about other inspectors as well - Business and Professional Regulations inpsectors, housing inspectors etc. If they're not doing their job properly, it could mean peoples health and in some cases their lives.
aimeeb aimeeb 7 years
Wow, so bad...
ilanac13 ilanac13 7 years
this really is troubling. think about it - if you know that a place has been horrid for a while and they still got a good rating - that's just something that's not right. i hope that there's some better way to monitor things. think about all the unemployed right now - i'm sure that there are PLENTY of people that could be trained to do that so there are more inspectors out on the road so every plant/restaurant/whatever is inspected.
sandy82 sandy82 7 years
This is so disconcerting.
Refreezing Thawed Meat
Green Garlic Soup
How to Introduce Peanuts to a Baby
Salmonella Egg Recall — Kids Shouldn't Taste Cookie Dough or Cake Batter
Older Parents Adopting Kids
Peanuts and Charlie Brown Holiday Gift Ideas For Kids

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

From Our Partners
Latest Food
X