Skip Nav
Steph and Ayesha Curry Are Already the Best Couple of 2016 — Here's 17 Reasons
New Year
11 Sex Slang Terms You Need to Know in 2016
Valentine's Day
50 Valentine's Day Gift Ideas For Both Him and Her

Candidates Release Joint Statement on Darfur

Candidates' Joint Statement Vows Vigilance on Darfur

In a strong and perhaps rare show of unity, all three candidates declared in a joint statement released today by the Save Darfur Coalition, that waiting for the end of the Bush administration will do the Sudanese government no good. McCain, Clinton, and Obama said this:

Today, we wish to make clear to the Sudanese government that on this moral issue of tremendous importance, there is no divide between us. If peace and security for the people of Sudan are not in place when one of us is inaugurated as president on Jan. 20, 2009, we pledge that the next administration will pursue these goals with unstinting resolve.

Though the statement is mostly symbolic — the three are not proposing any specific Congressional action against Sudan, or any tangible steps by the United States to put pressure on the Sudanese government — is it an effective way to send a message to the government of Sudan that the next American president will continue to hold firm on Darfur?

At least 200,000 people have been killed there since the Arab-dominated government of Sudan unleashed tribal militias known as the janjaweed on non-Arab rebel groups and civilians. The Sudanese government says that number is exaggerated and denies that the killing amounts to genocide. Is a joint statement a good omen for the coming campaign? Will it help?


Around The Web
Chloe Grace Moretz Quotes on Hillary Clinton
Wall Street Topic During Democratic Debate
Hillary Clinton's Comment About Being a Woman For President
Becoming an Adult During Obama's Presidency
Obama's Speech on Gun Control Executive Action
Clinton and Sanders Tie Iowa Democratic Caucus 2016
Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee With Barack Obama

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

Join The Conversation
stephley stephley 7 years
I suppose it could become an issue if the candidates were forced to say if they would continue to press Sudan's government on Darfur at the expense of any information the government could give regarding terrorist movements through and around Sudan.
Jillness Jillness 7 years
At least this is one thing they won't bicker about in the next 6 months. That is a good thing, right? So tired of the squabbling!
Jillness Jillness 7 years
At least this is one thing they won't bicker about in the next 6 months. That is a good thing, right? So tired of the squabbling!
stephley stephley 7 years
they've made it pretty clear on this one - no!
raciccarone raciccarone 7 years
After the great strides we've made in Iraq and Afghanistan, does anyone really want our help any more?
MartiniLush MartiniLush 7 years
While the gesture is great, all it amounts to is more talk and no action....
stephley stephley 7 years
It's a nice gesture, but I don't think it'll make any difference here or in Sudan.
Jillness Jillness 7 years
I think this is a great step for the 3 candidates! Even if it is mostly symbolic, it puts a little more pressure on Bush to be productive and not get "senioritis" too soon!
Latest Love