Skip Nav
Relationships
Steph and Ayesha Curry Are Already the Best Couple of 2016 — Here's 17 Reasons
New Year
11 Sex Slang Terms You Need to Know in 2016
Valentine's Day
50 Valentine's Day Gift Ideas For Both Him and Her

Citizen Poll: Your Thoughts on Politicians With Prior Drug Use?

Politicians used to avoid admitting to past drug use at all costs. In 1992, Bill Clinton infamously hedged that although he tried marijuana, he did not inhale. Yet in 2000, George W. Bush's youthful indiscretions did not doom his bid for presidency. By 2004, candidates openly admitted to experimentation with marijuana. Senator Joe Lieberman even apologized at a debate for never smoking pot.

This election season, candidates are being open once again. When asked if he ever smoked (and inhaled) marijuana, Barack Obama responded: "I inhaled . . . frequently. That was the point." Check out the video above to see a good recap of the changing political impact of past drug use.

How does disclosure of past drug use impact your opinion of a candidate?

Around The Web
9-Year-Old Syrian Refugee at State of the Union 2016
Obama's Speech on Gun Control Executive Action
Presidents' Pets
Aretha Franklin Performance Brings President Obama to Tears

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

Join The Conversation
Jillness Jillness 8 years
The majority of Americans have used illegal drugs once in their lives. I think there are other aspects of a person's life that reflect more about their character than if they have ever abused a substance before.
Jillness Jillness 8 years
The majority of Americans have used illegal drugs once in their lives. I think there are other aspects of a person's life that reflect more about their character than if they have ever abused a substance before.
MandyJoBo MandyJoBo 8 years
I'm on the fence. I do question someone's character when they do drugs, but I also think it makes his character stronger by quitting and not allowing himself to become an addict. However, I'm not falling for any "I did drugs, I'm just like you!" BS from any candidate. They only disclose because they have to. It's the old debate of whether or not to disclose to your children that you were once what you're trying to keep them from being. MOST people choose not to tell them, but if they had another set of parents, or three or four, who all did that and it backfired, you would tell them! He's not stupid; his people aren't stupid. They can see what happened to say, Clinton, and I'm sure it was also a nice little bonus poke at Hilary.
MandyJoBo MandyJoBo 8 years
I'm on the fence. I do question someone's character when they do drugs, but I also think it makes his character stronger by quitting and not allowing himself to become an addict. However, I'm not falling for any "I did drugs, I'm just like you!" BS from any candidate. They only disclose because they have to. It's the old debate of whether or not to disclose to your children that you were once what you're trying to keep them from being. MOST people choose not to tell them, but if they had another set of parents, or three or four, who all did that and it backfired, you would tell them! He's not stupid; his people aren't stupid. They can see what happened to say, Clinton, and I'm sure it was also a nice little bonus poke at Hilary.
AbbyHintz AbbyHintz 8 years
you take me too seriously---
AbbyHintz AbbyHintz 8 years
you take me too seriously---
TechnoMom TechnoMom 8 years
That's a silly assumption, AbbyHintz. My partner and I are definitely NOT Republican, but neither of us have ever tried pot or anything other illegal substance. He just wasn't interested. I've had dangerous reactions to so many prescribed medications that there's no way I'd ever risk putting Goddess-knows-what, bought off somebody on the street, into my system. My daughter has more drug allergies than I do, and I pray that she won't feel a need to experiment along those lines, either.On the other hand, my girl's biofather turned into Mr. Conservative Republican, and he did pot and coke earlier in his life, according to him. The people I knew from school who did the most drugs are all Republicans now, too.Republican doesn't mean "doesn't do drugs" and Democratic or Libertarian doesn't mean "does drugs." Republican does usually mean they support the war on drugs, but all of them that I know think that all applies to "those people" (meaning poor, minorities, etc.).
TechnoMom TechnoMom 8 years
That's a silly assumption, AbbyHintz. My partner and I are definitely NOT Republican, but neither of us have ever tried pot or anything other illegal substance. He just wasn't interested. I've had dangerous reactions to so many prescribed medications that there's no way I'd ever risk putting Goddess-knows-what, bought off somebody on the street, into my system. My daughter has more drug allergies than I do, and I pray that she won't feel a need to experiment along those lines, either. On the other hand, my girl's biofather turned into Mr. Conservative Republican, and he did pot and coke earlier in his life, according to him. The people I knew from school who did the most drugs are all Republicans now, too. Republican doesn't mean "doesn't do drugs" and Democratic or Libertarian doesn't mean "does drugs." Republican does usually mean they support the war on drugs, but all of them that I know think that all applies to "those people" (meaning poor, minorities, etc.).
AbbyHintz AbbyHintz 8 years
...I have to question any democratic candidate who has not used drugs. Either they aren't being honest, or they're closet-Republicans.
Renees3 Renees3 8 years
Drug use is not really an issue to me. I'm more curious as to how he wants to handle our growing substance abuse issues. Reagan decided to criminalize addicts, putting them in jail. That has backfired on us, in CA the jails are 80% full of addicts. How about getting them some help? Believe me when I say jails are not there to rehabilitate. If anything, you learn more in there on how to be a better addict. I'm a little biased on the issue, being an addict with 5 years clean. I spent time in jail for my crimes and have come out a better person. I was lucky enough to get the help I needed and am now in turn able to help others. I wish more people cared about this problem instead of a presidential candidate that did something when he was a teen that MOST people do as teens.
madam-pince madam-pince 8 years
I'm with The Missus.
madam-pince madam-pince 8 years
I'm with The Missus.
grrlyrebel grrlyrebel 8 years
Everyone has made decisions that they aren't proud of. It's refreshing that presidential candidates are willing to admit lapses in good judgment and be honest with their constituents.
grrlyrebel grrlyrebel 8 years
Everyone has made decisions that they aren't proud of. It's refreshing that presidential candidates are willing to admit lapses in good judgment and be honest with their constituents.
AlyCat82 AlyCat82 8 years
Prior drug use can be a valid issue in an election. I would not want to vote for a candidate that had a substance abuse problem, say, last night. Substance addiction does show a lack of some character attributes that are essential to being a good president; however the lack of said attributes, like maturity, reasoning skills, and understanding of consequences are also frequently common in youths. It is precisely because someone is young and immature that someone would make such a choice. (This argument only works for a candidate that used drugs as a youth...I would have to formulate a different one for a candidate with a current addiction. I understand this.) For this reason, prior drug use can be blown (way) out of proportion, especially when a candidate experimented twenty or thirty years ago. I feel that when candidates are honest about their youth, they should not be penalized, especially when it is something so trivial. I would much rather that the media's attention stayed focused on policy, ideas, initiative, and voting records. By critiquing someone's high school record, we take our attention off of issues that are of grave importance to this nation.
AlyCat82 AlyCat82 8 years
Prior drug use can be a valid issue in an election. I would not want to vote for a candidate that had a substance abuse problem, say, last night. Substance addiction does show a lack of some character attributes that are essential to being a good president; however the lack of said attributes, like maturity, reasoning skills, and understanding of consequences are also frequently common in youths. It is precisely because someone is young and immature that someone would make such a choice. (This argument only works for a candidate that used drugs as a youth...I would have to formulate a different one for a candidate with a current addiction. I understand this.) For this reason, prior drug use can be blown (way) out of proportion, especially when a candidate experimented twenty or thirty years ago. I feel that when candidates are honest about their youth, they should not be penalized, especially when it is something so trivial. I would much rather that the media's attention stayed focused on policy, ideas, initiative, and voting records. By critiquing someone's high school record, we take our attention off of issues that are of grave importance to this nation.
alllacedup alllacedup 8 years
The only way it would make a difference to me is if the candidate said they hadn't and really had. I liked that Obama was open and honest about his past use. It showed me that hopefully he will be open and honest about other things as well.
anned anned 8 years
I don't think it has an impact, but it is best to disclose that info.
Kristinh1012 Kristinh1012 8 years
Is pot still a drug?
Kristinh1012 Kristinh1012 8 years
Is pot still a drug?
remedios remedios 8 years
I don't care what someone did, drugs or otherwise, in a past life. I only care about who that person is now and who that person will be when leading. I don't like hypocrisy though, so how that person responds to others who are in the position that s/he once was matters.
Neechee51 Neechee51 8 years
It's not an issue to me...perhaps it would help some of our current leadership to loosen up a bit.
baltimoregal baltimoregal 8 years
At least Obama admits to his indiscretions- and not because he has to. And he doesn't minimize them, either. Bush- well we all know he is a liar about his past- it's been proven, hasn't it?
gooniette gooniette 8 years
I don't care what they used as long as they didn't hurt other people in the process.
gooniette gooniette 8 years
I don't care what they used as long as they didn't hurt other people in the process.
Latest Love
X