England is bringing the "are moobs the same as boobs?" controversy to the courts! (You can't see me jumping for joy over here, but I am. Trust.) A man recently got away with secretly filming another man in his swimming trunks at a public pool because it was declared legal to ogle a man's chest but not a woman's breasts. Here's my favorite part of the news article, which you can read by clicking here: "This was the case even if the man in question was obese, and had 'man breasts' or 'moobs. . .' " Another judge has overturned the ruling because the judge in the first case, he claims, "failed properly to explain to the jury the difference between breasts and chest." Wow. May I be a juror? Please, please?!