Skip Nav
Watch Our LIVE Holiday Gift Guide Show Now and Win Big!
Relationships
20 Sexy Gifts For Your Significant Other
Wedding
51 Real-Girl Engagement Rings Massive Enough to Ice-Skate On

Kate Middleton Grazia Magazine Cover

British Mag Photoshops Kate Middleton?

Has British mag Grazia gone bonkers?! Not even a week after the royal wedding and Kate has already gone under the Photoshop knife! Is it just me, or did the mag take her already teeny tiny waist and trim it down even more? I'm flabbergasted. Is this the kind of thing that can be expected once you're in the spotlight? Or has Grazia gone too far?

Update: Grazia tells us it didn't Photoshop the image. However, something's fishy because it looks like Kate's head is identical in both images, but her arm is clearly different (in the cover image both arms are holding the bouquet, in the one on the right, only one arm is), so did they put her head on a different body? Any thoughts?

Keep reading to see the Australian Grazia cover without the Photoshopped waist.

Image Source: Getty
Around The Web
Join The Conversation
littlemunchkin littlemunchkin 5 years
I edit myself - they obviously photoshopped her arm, which has resulted in the mirror image, but they haven't deliberately photoshopped her to make her look thinner.
littlemunchkin littlemunchkin 5 years
I have the magazine sitting in front of me. They didn't photoshop at all.
dreejay dreejay 5 years
Her waist looks smaller to me, which doesn't make sense because I thought she looked phenomenal in that dress to begin with! Why alter it?
Sundaydrive Sundaydrive 5 years
Mirror imaging was definitely done on this image. Just looking at the bouquet, you can tell that the left side of the bouquet is identical to the right on the magazine cover, but in the actual picture the sides aren't as identical (which is how it should be). I'm sure this was done just because they weren't finding a good full on photo without her holding William's hand or being with someone else. Thats why her waist looks smaller, and why she looks like she's facing head on instead of slightly to the side like the original photo.
Studio16 Studio16 5 years
Her facial expression is different if you look closely. (She doesn't strike me as very expressive, so it would be totally normal for her to make the same expression in two different pictures.)I think people are just looking for something to complain about.
Studio16 Studio16 5 years
Her facial expression is different if you look closely. (She doesn't strike me as very expressive, so it would be totally normal for her to make the same expression in two different pictures.) I think people are just looking for something to complain about.
myhousemd myhousemd 5 years
It looks to me like they did a mirror effect with her body. The bouquet looks too perfectly symmetrical, as well as how her arms are held on the magazine cover. That may contribute to the whittled-waist effect.
amber512 amber512 5 years
That is disturbing! Why can't magazines just leave people alone! I can't even count how many times I have received a magazine and had to search the cover to find where they say who the cover model is. Then I'll think "really?? that looks NOTHING like her!" Geez, so fake looking!
Princess Mary of Denmark's Style
Princess Diana's Kensington Palace Apartment as Offices
Kate Middleton's Style Evolution
How to Dress Like Kate Middleton
Pictures of Prince Philip With His Grandchildren
Kate Middleton Wardrobe Malfunction
Best Royal Family Christmas Pictures

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

From Our Partners
Latest Love
All the Latest From Ryan Reynolds