Skip Nav
JK Rowling
32 Ways Harry Potter Taught Us the Magic of Love
Relationships
26 Perks of Being in a Serious Relationship in Your 20s
Relationships
The Bachelor's Sean and Catherine Lowe Dish Sweet Details on Their Baby-to-Be

Landmark Decision in Manboob Ogling Struggle

Click to Read

Landmark Decision in Manboob Ogling Struggle Last year a British court found Kevin Bassett, 44, guilty of violating the 2003 Sexual Offences Act after he secretly filmed a man in his swimming trunks and no top at a swimming pool. Lawyers argued that the man's chest did not constitute "private parts," and the act only referred to women's breasts as such. A judge this week squashed that ruling, saying, "This act didn't mean to refer to the male chest but only to female breasts, it follows that the judge's directions on the meaning of breasts was erroneous." And check out Giggle's legendary picture collage and take on the case.

0 Comments
Around The Web
These Are the 3 Words Becky G Uses to Describe Her Style
How Samantha Bee Became Late Night's New Queen
Matt LeBlanc Opens Up About Experiencing a Nervous Breakdown After Friends
An It Girl's Guide to NYFW

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

Join The Conversation
raciccarone raciccarone 7 years
That guy was asking for it. You don't walk around with hot, sweet pecs and expect to not to get ogled?
stephley stephley 7 years
Doesn't it?! Very creepy.
harmonyfrance harmonyfrance 7 years
Something about this post makes me very uncomfortable. :rotfl:
stephley stephley 7 years
Imagine going to law school so you could spend you day debating what constitutes male naughty bits.
Latest Love
X