Skip Nav
Romantic Comedies
8 New Romances on Netflix in February
Books
23 Books You Should Read This Winter
Valentine's Day
20 Sexy Gifts For Your Significant Other

Michele Bachmann Debates Rick Perry About HPV Vaccine

Michele Bachmann Goes After Rick Perry For HPV Vaccine, Calls Plan B the "Morning-After Abortion Pill"

In 2007, Texas Gov. Rick Perry signed an executive order mandating HPV vaccine shots for girls in the state unless parents opted out. At the time he said, "providing the HPV vaccine doesn't promote sexual promiscuity any more than the Hepatitis B vaccine promotes drug use." It was a position that stands out amongst Perry's other socially conservative stances on women's health issues, including supporting laws that reduce abortion access, and Perry now says it was a mistake to mandate the vaccine through an executive order. Perry wishes he had passed it through the state legislature, which ultimately overturned his order. Regardless of his attempts to walk back his relatively progressive move, now Republican presidential candidate Perry is taking heat for it from his socially conservative opponents, especially Congresswoman Michele Bachmann.

Despite being a mother of three biological daughters (and other foster children) and a woman herself, Bachmann is not persuaded by the HPV vaccine's promise of preventing cervical cancer. Last night at the Tea Party-sponsored presidential debate, she called it a "government injection." Bachmann said:

"To have innocent little 12-year-old girls be forced to have a government injection through an executive order is just flat out wrong. That should never be done. That's a violation of liberty interests. Little girls who have a negative reaction to this potentially dangerous drug don't get a mulligan. They don't get a do-over. The parents don't get a do-over."

Perry was at pains to point out that parents had a choice whether or not to vaccinate their daughters in the first place. Bachmann also compared this "government injection" to Obama's supposed mandate of the "morning-after abortion pill" — something that does not exist. Bachmann spread her misinformation about emergency contraception, which is not the abortion pill (RU-486):

"President Obama in a stunning, shocking level of power now just recently told all private insurance companies you must offer the morning-after abortion pill because I said so and it must be free of charge. That same level coming through executive orders and through government dictates is wrong."

Here's the truth: under health care reform, new health insurance plans will cover the morning-after pill, which prevents a pregnancy before it happens and does not induce abortion. Watch Perry and Bachmann debate the vaccine and Bachmann call emergency contraception the "morning-after abortion pill" below.

Around The Web
Latino Celebrities Urge Fans Not to Vote For Trump
Marco Rubio Repeating Himself at GOP Debate
Beyonce's Halftime Show Pays Homage to Black History | Video
Barack and Michelle Obama PDA 2012
Facebook Election Stats
Bernie Sanders vs. Hillary Clinton Memes
Joe and Jill Biden Pictures

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

Join The Conversation
amber512 amber512 4 years
It scares me more and more than anyone actually listens to this woman...
Annie-Gabillet Annie-Gabillet 4 years
Amen, reesiecup!
Annie-Gabillet Annie-Gabillet 4 years
Amen, reesiecup!
reesiecup reesiecup 4 years
She is certainly entitled to her opinion, but I wish she would at least TRY to do some research prior to poisoning the minds of others. In my opinion, I see nothing wrong with offering a vaccine that decreases the risk of developing a preventable cancer. According to the CDC, ~12,000 women get cervical cancer in the U.S. annually and most all of these cancers are HPV-associated. HPV infection has been linked to development of not only cervical, but also oral and anal cancers. What negative reactions is she insinuating? It's just as easy to get a similar reaction to the flu shot. But what are the consequences of developing cervical cancer vs. risk of getting the vaccine? And if these women who get cervical cancer, who pays for their treatment if they don't have health insurance? The HPV vaccine, which only covers certain strains of the virus, confers no protection to females that already have these certain strains of HPV. Hence, it is recommended to be administered at an early age. She can rest assured that drug makers are not actively seeking to "promote promiscuity." Plan B is merely a double dose of a conventional oral birth control. The active ingredient levonorgestrel inhibits implantation but is not effective once the implantation process has begun and is therefore, not classified as an abortifacient. Lastly, I appreciate her double standard for "liberty interests" to only support the ones she finds convenient.
reesiecup reesiecup 4 years
She is certainly entitled to her opinion, but I wish she would at least TRY to do some research prior to poisoning the minds of others. In my opinion, I see nothing wrong with offering a vaccine that decreases the risk of developing a preventable cancer. According to the CDC, ~12,000 women get cervical cancer in the U.S. annually and most all of these cancers are HPV-associated. HPV infection has been linked to development of not only cervical, but also oral and anal cancers. What negative reactions is she insinuating? It's just as easy to get a similar reaction to the flu shot. But what are the consequences of developing cervical cancer vs. risk of getting the vaccine? And if these women who get cervical cancer, who pays for their treatment if they don't have health insurance? The HPV vaccine, which only covers certain strains of the virus, confers no protection to females that already have these certain strains of HPV. Hence, it is recommended to be administered at an early age. She can rest assured that drug makers are not actively seeking to "promote promiscuity." Plan B is merely a double dose of a conventional oral birth control. The active ingredient levonorgestrel inhibits implantation but is not effective once the implantation process has begun and is therefore, not classified as an abortifacient. Lastly, I appreciate her double standard for "liberty interests" to only support the ones she finds convenient.
Latest Love
X