Skip Nav
Relationships
My Boyfriend Had to Choose Between His Mom and Me — and He Chose Me
Viral Videos
This Guy Surprised His Grandma With the SWEETEST Birthday Gift
Relationships
Successful Couples SWEAR By This Practical Secret to a Happy and Long Relationship

Obama Plans Railroad Expansion — Are You On Board?

The latest stimulus bill includes $8 billion for America's railroad system, and President Obama has plans to obtain more tax money each year with the hopes of giving the country's railway a racy makeover. Obama will ask Congress for $1 billion more each year for the next five years. Conversely, President Bush set aside only $1.5 billion for high-speed rail through 2013.

The current amount (added to the stimulus bill during final closed-door negotiations) far surpasses that of any previous railway project. Obama's thinking big, and wants to connect cities with high-speed trains. The project would impact almost every region in the country, at a high price of course.

When I've traveled in Europe I loved the convenience of high-speed trains that connect cities (and countries) throughout the continent. The idea of bringing the American railroad system into the 21st century makes me excited! But, do you think it's worth it?

Source

Around The Web
Join The Conversation
UnDave35 UnDave35 7 years
What I'm saying is if you want train travel to come back (Not commuter light rail), then you need to make it cheap and easy. Right now it's cheaper and easier to drive or fly. We would need to eliminate the ability to drive so easily in order to make train travel attractive.
Jazz-Z Jazz-Z 7 years
When you suggested if we go back to trains we should eliminate the interstate system, I felt it pertinent to note that we need both trains AND the interstate...might as well add boats, bikes, skateboards and any other form of transportation available or plausible.
UnDave35 UnDave35 7 years
I've driven in Indianapolis during rush hour for 12 years before moving and experiencing Minniapolis/St Paul during rush hour. I agree that we need multiple forms of public transportation, but I thought we were talking about Amtrack, which isn't a commuter system.
Jazz-Z Jazz-Z 7 years
UnDave have you ever travelled in your car during rush hour in California, Minnesota, New York, North Logan or North Salt Lake Utah for that matter? You need both commuter rail and the interstate for both to be efficient.
Lilie Lilie 7 years
I would probably agree, but I won't, since I don't live here and wouldn't want to talk for people I don't know. You said people "in those other countries" have to take the train because they have to and don't have cars or interstates, which is mostly wrong, and that was what i was talking about.
Lilie Lilie 7 years
I would probably agree, but I won't, since I don't live here and wouldn't want to talk for people I don't know. You said people "in those other countries" have to take the train because they have to and don't have cars or interstates, which is mostly wrong, and that was what i was talking about.
UnDave35 UnDave35 7 years
"Sometimes people take the train because it's just more responsible."I will agree that some people take the train because they feel it's just more responsible. Would you also agree that the vast majority of Americans take their own car because it makes more fiscal sense, as it costs them less money to drive than to take the train?
UnDave35 UnDave35 7 years
"Sometimes people take the train because it's just more responsible." I will agree that some people take the train because they feel it's just more responsible. Would you also agree that the vast majority of Americans take their own car because it makes more fiscal sense, as it costs them less money to drive than to take the train?
Lilie Lilie 7 years
Aw, UnDave, thank you. I never would have known my own country without you. Sometimes people take the train because it's just more responsible.
UnDave35 UnDave35 7 years
What is the difference between all the other countries that have been mentioned and the US? Focus. More people in those other countries take the train because they have to. People here jump in their car and drive, because they can. Take away the interstate system, and make the train the only mode of travel, or it will never be truly viable.
Jazz-Z Jazz-Z 7 years
ilovevodka ~ I feel like you've beat me because you were lucky enough to try one out! I think it would be awesome.
CoralAmber CoralAmber 7 years
This is a great idea, and I hope this money gets the ball rolling. I would be very interested in taking a fast train as opposed to flying if it were comparably priced, even if it took longer.
ilovevodka ilovevodka 7 years
Jazz Z - you beat me! I too was going to bring up the Japan train system, which is incredible! I used it to travel throughout Japan, it was easy and we were able to see the entire region. They also have an freeway system, so the two can co-exist. Now any time I have to catch a flight from Phoenix to Las Vegas, or Phoenix to CA I think about how much time and natural resources that could be saved if there was a speed train to local destinations.
ilovevodka ilovevodka 7 years
Jazz Z - you beat me! I too was going to bring up the Japan train system, which is incredible! I used it to travel throughout Japan, it was easy and we were able to see the entire region. They also have an freeway system, so the two can co-exist.Now any time I have to catch a flight from Phoenix to Las Vegas, or Phoenix to CA I think about how much time and natural resources that could be saved if there was a speed train to local destinations.
TsuKata TsuKata 7 years
I can't wait for this. Anything that will let me avoid the airport and TSA is fine by me.
Jazz-Z Jazz-Z 7 years
UnDave I don't know where you are getting your informaton "IMO, rail travel and interstate systems can't coexist." but in Utah where UDOT just built the controversial Legacy Parkway, it was with the understanding that commuter rail would also have to be extended in order to keep on top of traffic. As far as train travel taking longer... High-Speed Bullet Train in Japan Train lovers around the world are jealous of Japan's high-speed trains. For example, the 1,528 miles Shinkansen railways network has trains that go up to 188 mph (300 kph). "Test run speeds have been 443 km/h (275 mph) for conventional rail in 1996, and up to a world record of 581 km/h (361 mph) for maglev trainsets, in 2003." http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/09/japan-high-speed-bullet-train-kawasaki-efset.php
Jazz-Z Jazz-Z 7 years
UnDave I don't know where you are getting your informaton "IMO, rail travel and interstate systems can't coexist." but in Utah where UDOT just built the controversial Legacy Parkway, it was with the understanding that commuter rail would also have to be extended in order to keep on top of traffic. As far as train travel taking longer...High-Speed Bullet Train in JapanTrain lovers around the world are jealous of Japan's high-speed trains. For example, the 1,528 miles Shinkansen railways network has trains that go up to 188 mph (300 kph). "Test run speeds have been 443 km/h (275 mph) for conventional rail in 1996, and up to a world record of 581 km/h (361 mph) for maglev trainsets, in 2003."http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/09/japan-high-speed-bullet-train-kawasaki-efset.php
amybdk amybdk 7 years
I think this is fantastic news. I love train travel! Yes, it takes way longer to take a train somewhere than to drive, but I imagine that speed/time is an issue that would be worked out over time. Train travel, in my experience, has been so much more relaxed and interesting than airline travel.
amybdk amybdk 7 years
I think this is fantastic news. I love train travel! Yes, it takes way longer to take a train somewhere than to drive, but I imagine that speed/time is an issue that would be worked out over time. Train travel, in my experience, has been so much more relaxed and interesting than airline travel.
StolzeMama StolzeMama 7 years
$600 round trip from CA to DC and it will take 3 days there and 3 days back. 198 round trip airfare.... You can't even get to south dakota. and round trip from hanford ca to seattle was 370. I got roundtrip airfare for $200I think 8 bill and 1 bill a year even if 40 years from now, maybe we can finish rail in california....
StolzeMama StolzeMama 7 years
$600 round trip from CA to DC and it will take 3 days there and 3 days back. 198 round trip airfare.... You can't even get to south dakota. and round trip from hanford ca to seattle was 370. I got roundtrip airfare for $200 I think 8 bill and 1 bill a year even if 40 years from now, maybe we can finish rail in california....
UnDave35 UnDave35 7 years
The interstate systems are not as expansive as they are here. Also, as Hainan pointed out, rail travel is almost more expensive than air travel. So if I have to spend $200 for a round trip ticket to North Carolina, and it's going to take me 24 hourse to get there, why not spend $250 for the round trip air fair, and get there in 3?
babaloo babaloo 7 years
I would prefer we invest in ALL alternatives. Drilling for oil, or nat gas for that matter, would be the bridge that got us to the point where efficient and economical battery power would be feasible, and it would secure this country as well. Because even if we do not drill we will still be importing from countries that do not care for us. I'd prefer the money stay in this country.
momma-tikita momma-tikita 7 years
Great idea..Love it. I personally always take the lightrail and subway whenever I can.
Barack and Michelle Obama Cute Couple Pictures
Republicans React to Obama's DNC 2016 Speech
Obama Addresses People Who Don't Like Hillary Clinton
Barack Obama DNC Speech 2016
Sasha and Malia Obama Through the Years | Video
Young Boy Touches Barack Obama's Hair
Michelle Obama's Best Moments | Video

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

From Our Partners
Latest Love
X