Skip Nav
Each Table at This Beautiful Wedding Had a Disneyland-Attraction Theme
Chinese New Year
7 Fascinating Facts About Chinese Zodiac Signs
Fifty Shades of Grey
How to Make Fifty Shades Darker Your Hottest Date Night Ever

Secret House Session on Surveillance

House Talks Surveillance in Secret, Senate Kills Earmark Ban

Moments ago at a campaign rally in Springfield, PA, John McCain told the familiar funny about laws and sausages, "the two things you don't want to watch being made." McCain was referring to last night's vote-and-dash in the Senate, combined with the House's rare closed debate on the surveillance bill. He said, "It's hard to do the Lord's work in the city of Satan." (John McCain! I've missed you! )

It was a big, big day of voting that lured all the big presidential-candidates/senators (is that like model/actress?) back to Washington yesterday. Obama and Clinton even had a friendly little convo on the floor of the Senate prior to voting to ban earmark spending for a year (McCain also voted for the ban), which ultimately failed. McCain said of the vote, "We're disappointed that only 29 members of the US Senate understand that the American people want us to stop this practice, which has led to corruption."

To eavesdrop on what happened in the secretive House,


In the first secret session of the House in 25 years (only five of which have taken place since 1825 — the last one was over paramilitary operations in Nicaragua) heated debate took place over the Democrats' newly proposed bill to set rules for the government's surveillance of phone calls and emails. The secret session was secured by House Republicans to delay the vote by one day.

President Bush has vowed to veto the bill in favor of the FISA bill passed by the Senate. The president's main objection is that the bill does not protect from lawsuits telecommunications companies that allowed the government to eavesdrop on their customers without legal court-backed permission.

Were you glad to see the candidates back in the Capitol? Does the secret closed session bother you? Do you think, like the candidates, the earmark ban should have passed?


Around The Web
Join The Conversation
lilkimbo lilkimbo 8 years
I think public opinion is definitely slanted toward the earmark ban, even if these candidates aren't for it. There's a good chance they knew it wasn't going to pass, but voted for it just to look good in the public eye. Politics is such an interesting game.
kmwerts kmwerts 8 years
I find it interesting that the 3 candidates running for president all voted the same way, even though they are from different parties, and are generally trying to point out differences between each other so voters will have strong opinions. Obviously public opinion is greatly slanted toward the earmark ban . . .
hausfrau hausfrau 8 years
Citizen I believe its like actress/model. You have to put actress first so they know how talented you are. :)
MarinerMandy MarinerMandy 8 years
That was a pretty funny comment by McCain! I guess you can be in the Senate and have a sense of humor at the same time. I'm not huge on secrecy in government, but since everything Congress does is on CSPAN maybe sometimes it is necessary. I'm not really sure why this justified a secret session, but I'm not going to get worked up over it.
lilkimbo lilkimbo 8 years
I think only 29 voted for banning earmarks.
piper23 piper23 8 years
I would love to know who the 29 senators were that voted against banning earmarks.
Hillary Clinton's Tweets About the Women's March
Michelle Obama and Melania Trump Style Differences
Hillary Clinton's White Pantsuit (Video)
Girl's Reaction to Hillary's Loss
Will Hillary Clinton Run For Mayor of New York City?
What to Say to Trump Supporters
Hillary Clinton Holiday Message

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

From Our Partners
Latest Love
All the Latest From Ryan Reynolds