Skip Nav
Valentine's Day
Valentine's Day Lingerie For 13 Types of Couples
Celebrity Interviews
The Bachelor's Sean and Catherine Lowe Dish Sweet Details on Their Baby-to-Be
Women
Single Ladies! Be Bold and Take Our 30-Day Challenge

Sugar Daddies Are Making a Comeback!

Sugar Daddies were a thing of the '80s, but according to Fox News, they may be making a comeback! If you're unfamiliar with the term, a Sugar Daddy is an older, usually married guy, who has a younger mistress on the side. He's wealthy and he generally buys her extravagant gifts, takes her on luxurious trips, and gives her money to shop with. In return, she offers him sex with no strings attached. I know what you're thinking: it sounds like prostitution, but according to Fox News’ sexpert, Yvonne Fulbright, "pop culture has started to make this mainstream . . . and glamorize women who are in these situations."

Now that the economy has taken a nosedive, there is a resurgence of the Sugar Daddy, as some women are seeing this as a good option to get things they need or want. But it isn't just women taking from wealthy men. There are also Sugar Mommies — rich women getting sex by offering handsome young men material things. There are even online dating services, like sugardaddie.com, that help young individuals find a mature person to pamper them. I'm in no way supporting this kind of relationship and am really surprised that this is still going on. I know this is a little over the top, but tell me, do you know anyone in a relationship like this?

If you're interested in hearing more, check out this video from FOX News when you

.

Source

Around The Web
Valentine's Day Lingerie Gift Ideas
3 Exercises For Better Sex
Funny Sexual Stock Photos
Sean and Catherine Lowe Interview 2016
Gifts For a Long Distance Boyfriend
Audrey Carlan Calendar Girl
Stephen and Ayesha Curry Relationship Goals

POPSUGAR, the #1 independent media and technology company for women. Where more than 75 million women go for original, inspirational content that feeds their passions and interests.

Join The Conversation
ylovely ylovely 6 years
Gross. Not even if Clooney stepped to me. Gross.
legalbeagle legalbeagle 6 years
ahahahaha 'wrinkly peen' thats hilariousI would never want a sugardaddy... but apparently some women dont have morals or dignity so who am I to judge them.
legalbeagle legalbeagle 6 years
ahahahaha 'wrinkly peen' thats hilarious I would never want a sugardaddy... but apparently some women dont have morals or dignity so who am I to judge them.
jazzytummy jazzytummy 6 years
Sorry for the repetition, skigurl, couldn't edit it out. Didn't mean to offend you.
socialitebabe socialitebabe 6 years
Simply disgusting...you want the goods that bad then go out and work for them. Who wants wrinkly peen anyways? eww
skigurl skigurl 6 years
let's face it, jazzytummy, let's face it
skigurl skigurl 6 years
let's face it, jazzytummy, let's face it
jazzytummy jazzytummy 6 years
Let's face it, it is all a matter of degree. Is it any different when a 25 year old hot woman marries a 50 year old guy with money? Let's face it, marriage can be a bartered relationship, sex and arm candy in exchange for money. People may not look at it the same way as sugardaddy, because there is a ring and a piece of paper involved, but to me, it is still the same thing.....two people being together for their own reasons, love probably the least of it.
jazzytummy jazzytummy 6 years
Let's face it, it is all a matter of degree. Is it any different when a 25 year old hot woman marries a 50 year old guy with money? Let's face it, marriage can be a bartered relationship, sex and arm candy in exchange for money. People may not look at it the same way as sugardaddy, because there is a ring and a piece of paper involved, but to me, it is still the same thing.....two people being together for their own reasons, love probably the least of it.
losays losays 6 years
I don't mind what people do, as long as it isn't my husband who is the sugardaddy. I don't think this is necessarily prostitution, but I could see how some would think that. (side note: Babysoftpink, while I agree with some of your points, I really think you should approach an argument differently because you come off very abrasive with a "holier than thou" attitude. Although, I guess this is a sensitive subject, so maybe you are feeling defensive because people aren't agreeing with you.)
DearSugar DearSugar 6 years
Sorry guys; I didn’t mean to imply that I endorsed the notion of Sugar Daddies. But I can see how the posts could be interpreted that way so I made some additions to be more clear!
babysoftpink babysoftpink 6 years
Logic is logic, all inferences, no emotional attachment to the concluding statements. What I am trying to get at instead is the bigger picture here. Nonetheless, if you would like to be evaluate my writing technique, personalities and the lack thereof, feel free to it. But I would even be more appreciative if you are directing your comments to the topic and most importantly to the core of my arguments as well as the aforementioned logic used to derive my questions. Ultimately we all have faculties capable to make personal decisions in our lives and whether those decisions jive with each other's standards and expectations is a non-issue. The issue is your ability to keep an open minded such that your love and kindness can flow through you to those who you consider as different than you. You do not have to agree with them or even like them but two people have an opinion can passionately discuss their ideas openly without one person intending to change the other person's opinion through coercion, insults or other insensitive/critical deeds. I am most certainly guilty of the traits because I too am human and we all want to believe that our thoughts breed better approaches to a matter. However, the reason for allowing different types of people, different attitudes to the same matter, and different life styles and choices in a society is what makes this world beautiful. If a mono-cultural society is not one interesting enough to maintain, why would we strive to achieve a mono-thinking society, even a small one on here?Afterall, perhaps there ought to be a "s" after "logic" for pluralities is one of the "twelve pure concepts of the understanding" (as proposed by Kant in his Critique of Pure Reason). Hopefully, with more willingness and understanding, we are able to see different sides of a matter. 'Redeeming Love" by Francine Rivers is a book that I would recommend to you. The story is about the struggles of a girl who was a prostitute, even after marriage to a highly spiritual and dignified man, still voluntarily returned to her old trade. But both the man and god spend a lifetime to remove fear and hurt from her and replace them with love.Maybe not to the degree of prostituting yourself, but have you or anyone close to you fall from grace? If so, do you think that condemning the person is a healthy way to bring good to our society? To the law, there are variance in the degree of punishment to distinguish the severity of a crime. To me, a sin is a sin, whether you prostitute yourself or tell a lie. But I would still want to love the person even though it is not something that is easy to do. Before then, I would avoid judging or discriminating them because of their personal choices and I still want to respect the person even when their values are vastly in objection to mine.
babysoftpink babysoftpink 6 years
Logic is logic, all inferences, no emotional attachment to the concluding statements. What I am trying to get at instead is the bigger picture here. Nonetheless, if you would like to be evaluate my writing technique, personalities and the lack thereof, feel free to it. But I would even be more appreciative if you are directing your comments to the topic and most importantly to the core of my arguments as well as the aforementioned logic used to derive my questions. Ultimately we all have faculties capable to make personal decisions in our lives and whether those decisions jive with each other's standards and expectations is a non-issue. The issue is your ability to keep an open minded such that your love and kindness can flow through you to those who you consider as different than you. You do not have to agree with them or even like them but two people have an opinion can passionately discuss their ideas openly without one person intending to change the other person's opinion through coercion, insults or other insensitive/critical deeds. I am most certainly guilty of the traits because I too am human and we all want to believe that our thoughts breed better approaches to a matter. However, the reason for allowing different types of people, different attitudes to the same matter, and different life styles and choices in a society is what makes this world beautiful. If a mono-cultural society is not one interesting enough to maintain, why would we strive to achieve a mono-thinking society, even a small one on here? Afterall, perhaps there ought to be a "s" after "logic" for pluralities is one of the "twelve pure concepts of the understanding" (as proposed by Kant in his Critique of Pure Reason). Hopefully, with more willingness and understanding, we are able to see different sides of a matter. 'Redeeming Love" by Francine Rivers is a book that I would recommend to you. The story is about the struggles of a girl who was a prostitute, even after marriage to a highly spiritual and dignified man, still voluntarily returned to her old trade. But both the man and god spend a lifetime to remove fear and hurt from her and replace them with love. Maybe not to the degree of prostituting yourself, but have you or anyone close to you fall from grace? If so, do you think that condemning the person is a healthy way to bring good to our society? To the law, there are variance in the degree of punishment to distinguish the severity of a crime. To me, a sin is a sin, whether you prostitute yourself or tell a lie. But I would still want to love the person even though it is not something that is easy to do. Before then, I would avoid judging or discriminating them because of their personal choices and I still want to respect the person even when their values are vastly in objection to mine.
Smacks83 Smacks83 6 years
*homewreckers, oopsie, sometimes I type too fast for my own good, ha.
Smacks83 Smacks83 6 years
*homewreckers,oopsie, sometimes I type too fast for my own good, ha.
Smacks83 Smacks83 6 years
BabySoftPink...you're my hero. I personally don't equate it with prostitution, and I hate how some posters are making them all into second-class humans. And to those who label these people as homewreakers and such, I think those labels should be for the man/woman that is stepping out of their marriage to find these people. They wrecked their own homes (because just because it's not this girl doesn't mean that Sugar Daddy won't find another). And if that Sugar Daddy is single, then why the hell not. Don't judge those you don't truly know.
Smacks83 Smacks83 6 years
BabySoftPink...you're my hero.I personally don't equate it with prostitution, and I hate how some posters are making them all into second-class humans. And to those who label these people as homewreakers and such, I think those labels should be for the man/woman that is stepping out of their marriage to find these people. They wrecked their own homes (because just because it's not this girl doesn't mean that Sugar Daddy won't find another). And if that Sugar Daddy is single, then why the hell not. Don't judge those you don't truly know.
princess_eab princess_eab 6 years
Well, for one, "logics" is not the plural form of "logic," which is plural in its singular form - but I'm sure you knew that.
babysoftpink babysoftpink 6 years
Is punctuation and my style of writing all you've got? What are your logics to refute my points then? I'd like to hear them. By the way, I would appreciate it if you would edit out my posts and repost them here, the way you see fit. Also, after you screen capture my posts and submit to that certain website, please link it back to me as I would appreciate appropriate sources to be cited to my writing. As you know plagiarizing is not "nice"! :)
babysoftpink babysoftpink 6 years
Is punctuation and my style of writing all you've got? What are your logics to refute my points then? I'd like to hear them. By the way, I would appreciate it if you would edit out my posts and repost them here, the way you see fit. Also, after you screen capture my posts and submit to that certain website, please link it back to me as I would appreciate appropriate sources to be cited to my writing. As you know plagiarizing is not "nice"! :)
iconoclastgrl11 iconoclastgrl11 6 years
Wrong, awful, immoral, against public policy. Now where can I sign up?
RockAndRepublic RockAndRepublic 6 years
Ah, the accepted form of prostitution. I think someone would be offended if they were asked, "How much is your a$$ worth?" If you do this, they're asking you all the time, just not verbally.:P
tuscanstellina tuscanstellina 6 years
I never knew it was a "dated" thing. I believe it was still happening all through the 90's and into today. To each his own. If the man or woman isn't married, then who really cares?
0fashionqueen 0fashionqueen 6 years
I really do not think that they ever went out of fashion.
jennjennnbubba jennjennnbubba 6 years
i ♥ future-generation sugardaddies! srsly
Latest Love
X