Traister describes how Hillary's former "faults" are now being painted as strengths:
Her storied toughness was then read as craven ambition that was going to tear her party apart. Her knowledge of how Congress works was seen as part of her dynastic and corrupt Beltway privilege. And her engagement with working-class voters, well, that was just pandering to her supposedly racist base.
Ultimately, the article makes the obvious point that there's no way to know what would have happened — and in fact, there's good evidence that Hillary's presidency would look a lot like Obama's. Even so, would you rather have Hillary leading the country? Weigh in below.