PopSugar

Love It or Leave It? Disney-Inspired Engagement Rings

TresSugar — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:00:00 -0700

Some girls never let go of their wish to be princesses, and thanks to designer Kristie Kelly, they don't have to. The Kirstie Kelly for Disney by Mouwad collection, shown at Bridal Week in New York, features six engagement rings and wedding bands that pay homage to Disney's leading princesses.

The engagement rings, named after Sleeping Beauty, Snow White, Cinderella, Jasmine, Ariel, and Belle are supposed to be "subtle references to the personalities of each princess." For example, the baguettes and clean lines of the Ariel ring are supposed to reference the bold style of art deco and Ariel's "bold individuality."

Although I was never a fan of princesses, have no plans of getting married anytime soon, and would feel sheepish taking a leap into adulthood wearing a Disney-inspired engagement ring, I do fancy the look of the Sleeping Beauty ring. What do you feel about this collection?

Rachel Bilson Rocks The Blues Out In LA

PopSugarUK — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:15:00 -0700

Rachel Bilson was out in the LA sunshine this week as she met up with a friend for lunch in Los Feliz. Looking gorgeous in her tiny denim shorts and checked shirt, she accessorized with her shades and her gorgeous engagement ring - it's no surprise that she knows how to dress, since the fashion icon has a monthly column for US InStyle magazine! Back in April, Rachel and Hayden's wedding was the celeb ceremony that you were all looking forward to the most, are you still anticipating the couple's nuptials?

View 5 Photos ›

BigPicturesPhoto.com

Guess the Engagement Ring Style!

FabSugar — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:00:22 -0700

I'm nowhere near getting married but that doesn't mean I can't fantasize over my future engagement ring. Believe me people, this moment can make or break a relationship, just ask Carrie! In case you haven't noticed, there's a surfeit amount of styles to choose from - enough to leave you dizzy - so I'm going to test your bling knowledge. Now you've (hopefully) taken Pop's fun Guess the Celebrity Ring Quiz, take my exam to see if you can guess the engagement ring style.

Question 1 of 6

Can you guess this diamond cut?

Rachel Bilson Is Ready For Another Costume

PopSugar — Fri, 01 May 2009 04:00:00 -0700

Rachel Bilson flashed her engagement ring but couldn't hide her smile as she left Whole Foods in New York yesterday. She looked chic as usual, and her sense of style has even landed her a job at InStyle Magazine. That's not the only perk of being well-dressed - Rachel will be decked out in one of Brian Atwood's designs at the Costume Institute Gala on Monday. Last year's look wasn't our favorite, but there's always a second chance for one of our favorite impeccably dressed starlets.

View 5 Photos ›

Bauer-Griffin Online

Absolutely Fabulous

FabSugar — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:11:22 -0700

Our model fixations this week were the legendary Iman, sultry Cindy Crawford, and all-time great Kate Moss.
Speaking of, how well do you know models and their mates?
Wedding season has kicked off on the Sugar Network! Guess the engagement ring style.
Lots to choose from but who was most Fab at the 17 again premiere?
See how me and my girls make fashion fun at my Bedazzle Bonanza.
Go behind the seams at the celeb-drenched Loomstate for Target launch - in stores and online today!
Test your fashion knowledge from this week's episode of The Hills.
They're all hypnotizing, but which face on Vogue's model-infused cover is your fave?

How to Buy an Engagement Ring Online

GeekSugar — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:02:31 -0700

Online shopping can be daunting, especially if the item in question is something you want to ensure the authenticity of, like a Wii, a designer handbag, and yes. . . an engagement ring.

I know some of you are groaning about who or why someone would shop online for something so important, but the practice is rising in popularity as shops are becoming more trustworthy and offering better deals, not to mention the fact that the Internet promises something more rare than the cheesy jewelry store at your local mall.

Buying and browsing online for rings is great whether you're the proposer or the proposee - say you're waiting for a proposal but don't want to march in to your local jewelry stores - it's totally ok (and incognito) to check out rings and styles to find what you like. For the tips, read more

My personal favorite kinds of engagement rings are antiques, which can be hard to come by at brick-and-mortar stores, depending on where you live. A good friend of mine proposed last year with a gorgeous and one of a kind antique ring he'd found online, and then had it resized for his fiancee.

Or maybe there's a large, specific retailer (Tiffany's comes to mind, and goosebumps come to arms) that you want a ring from but can't make it to a location.

Here are some important things to keep in mind:

Like any ring shopping, do your research first on the four C's: Cut, clarity, carats, and color. Blue Nile has a great, comprehensive guide for you to bone up on your ring knowledge.
The website Pricescope reviews and compares diamond prices of Internet stores and physical stores - a great second stop after you've gotten your four C's class.
Look for GIA certification for any diamond - it's a gemologist's grade of the quality of the diamond.

Tiffany & Co.: It's Tiffany, so prices and standards are going to be higher, but like I said, if you can't get to an actual store, online is a great source, especially because you don't have to worry about the quality.
Antique Rings: Swoon! I love the idea of an engagement ring with history, and it's also a socially conscious choice. Some sites are: the Antique Jewelry Mall, Art Deco Diamonds (my fave for the photography), and don't count out eBay - just be smart about the seller.
Brilliant Earth: This awesome site specializes in conflict-free diamonds and if you don't necessarily want one of their rings, you can buy the loose conflict-free diamond and shop for a setting elsewhere. If you don't use Brilliant Earth, at least read the buying guide so you can learn to avoid "blood diamonds." Green Karat is another conscious online retailer - they use recycled gold.
Blue Nile: A reputable seller that boasts personal proposal stories from buyers (awww) and uses PayPal!
James Allen: Here, you can design your own ring (including a 3-D video of what you design) and use a virtual loupe (the thingie you use to inspect diamonds closely). Bonus: download diamond screen savers (for Windows only)!
Diamond Ideals: features a no-questions-asked return policy and a lifetime upgrade policy.
White Flash: offers free verification and free shipping.

And of course, do a lot of research on the piece and any retailer you might use prior to clicking "add to cart"! Oh, and, congratulations!

Source

You Asked: Can I Pick Out My Own Ring?

DearSugar — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:00:00 -0700

Dear Sugar,

A few months ago my boyfriend informally asked me to marry him (he said he'll surprise me with a formal proposal later). I said yes, and we've been talking about the details ever since. We've decided on a location and time of year, and I picked a dress. Really the only thing we haven't talked about is the ring.

I've had my eye on a ring for quite a while. It's a vintage ring I found online, and it's one-of-a-kind and very affordable. Would it be totally tacky to tell him it's what I want? Obviously, I would be beyond happy even if he picked out something on his own, but I really love this ring. Help! - I've Got My Mind Set Michelle

To see Dear Sugar's answer read more

Dear I've Got My Mind Set Michelle,

An engagement/wedding ring is a special token of affection that you will wear for your entire marriage, so it's important that you love it. Do you know if your boyfriend has already begun shopping for rings? Does he know the style you like? It sounds like you have already mapped out every other aspect of this engagement, so if I were you, I'd tell him about this ring you found.

It would be one thing, Michelle, if you were oohing and aahing over a ring that was out of his price range, but if it's reasonable, and you love it, you should have it! Many couples shop for the engagement ring together, and I am sure your boyfriend wants you to be happy with the ring you wear everyday. So one night when you're on the computer, show him what you found, ask him what he thinks, and play the conversation by ear – I am sure everything will fall right into place.

Congratulations on your engagement and good luck!

Source

Back pain and sciatica

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:00 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Causes
Risk Factors
Diagnosis
Medications
Complementary and Alternati...
Exercise and Physical Thera...
Surgery
Other Treatments
Specific Treatment for Acut...
Specific Treatment for Chro...
Prognosis
Complications
Prevention
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Surgery

Kyphoplasty, a surgical technique used to treat spinal fractures, does not improve a person's back pain or quality of life, according to a review published in 2006 by a nonprofit health services research agency. Kyphoplasty should only be done if bed rest, medicines, and physical therapy do not relieve back pain.

Ultrasound

Therapeutic ultrasound uses sound waves to deliver gentle vibrations to an area of the body. Scientists in England are studying whether therapeutic ultrasound may help relieve pain and disability due to sciatica.

Acupuncture

Studies continue to show that acupuncture helps some patients with low back pain. Now, research published in the British Medical Journal online says the alternative treatment seems to be worth the price in the long run.

Stem Cells

Researchers in England have pioneered a new technique to grow new spinal tissue using stem cells. Stem cells are the building blocks of specific cells. Every cell in the human body starts (or "stems") from a stem cell. Researchers say a patient's stem cells may someday be used to grow new tissue that can replace damaged discs.

Back pain tied to brain changes

Chronic back pain appears to be linked to tiny structural changes in the brain. German researchers have found that persons with chronic back pain have more activity in the parts of the brain involved in pain processing and emotional responses. It is unclear if the brain changes came before the pain or if they occurred in response to the pain. The scientists presented their findings at the 2006 Radiological Society of North American annual meeting.

Introduction

Back pain is one of the most common reasons people visit their doctor. According to the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 8 out of 10 people have some type of backache.

Back pain can be acute or chronic.

Acute pain develops suddenly and goes away within 6 weeks. Acute pain is the most common type of back pain.
Chronic pain can come on fast or slow, but it lasts longer than 3 months. Back pain can occur in any area of the back, but it is more common in the lower part, which supports most of the body’s weight.

The back is highly complex, and pain may result from damage or injury to any of various bones, nerves, muscles, ligaments, and other structures. Still, despite sophisticated techniques that provide detailed anatomical images of the spine and other tissues, the cause of most cases of back pain remain elusive.

Vertebrae. The spine is a column of small bones, or vertebrae, that support the entire upper body. The column is grouped into three sections.

The cervical (C) vertebrae are the seven spinal bones that support the neck.
The thoracic (T) vertebrae are the twelve spinal bones that connect to the rib cage.
The lumbar (L) vertebrae are the five lowest and largest bones of the spinal column. Most of the body's weight and stress falls on the lumbar vertebrae.

Click the icon to see an image of the spine.

Below the lumbar region is the sacrum, a shield-shaped bony structure that connects with the pelvis at the sacroiliac joints.

At the end of the sacrum are two to four tiny, partially fused vertebrae known as the coccyx or "tail bone."

Click the icon to see an image of the sacrum.

Each vertebra is designated by using a letter and number, which allows the doctor to determine where it is in the spine.

The letter reflects the spinal region where the vertebra is located: C=cervical (neck region), T=thoracic (chest, or middle back, region), and L=lumbar (lower back).
The number signifies the vertebra's place within that spinal region. The numbers start with 1 at the top of a region and count up as the vertebrae descend within the region. For example, C4 is the fourth bone down in the cervical region and T8 is the eighth thoracic vertebrae.

The Disks. Vertebrae in the spinal column are separated from each other by small cushions of cartilage known as intervertebral disks. The disks have no blood supply of their own. They need to rely on nearby blood vessels to keep them nourished.

Click the icon to see an image of an intervertebral disk.

Each disk is 80% water and contains two structures.

Inside each disk is a jelly-like substance called the nucleus pulposus.
The nucleus pulposus is surrounded by a tough, fibrous ring called the annulus.

Click the icon to see an image of the nucleus pulposus.

Processes. Each vertebra in the spine has a number of bony projections called processes. The spinal and transverse processes attach to the muscles in the back and act like little levers, allowing the spine to twist or bend. The particular processes form the joints between the vertebrae themselves, meeting together and interlocking at the zygapophysial joints (more commonly known as facet or z joints ).

Spinal Canal. Each vertebra and its processes surround and protect an arch-shaped central opening. These arches, aligned to run down the spine, form the spinal canal, which encloses the spinal cord.

Click the icon to see an image of the vertebrae and spinal cord.

Spinal Cord. The spinal cord is the central trunk of nerves that connects the brain with the rest of the body. Each nerve root passes from the spinal column to other parts of the body through small openings bounded on one side by the disk and the other by the facets. When the spinal cord reaches the lumbar region, it splits into four bundled strands of nerve roots called the cauda equina (meaning horsetail in Latin).

Click the icon to see an image of the cauda equina.

Causes

In about 85% of back pain cases, the origin of the pain is unknown, and imaging studies usually fail to determine the cause. Disk herniation and disk degeneration due to aging are the most common causes of low back pain. Other problems can also cause this pain, however.

Over the years, the disk can wear away (degenerate), causing inflammation and irritation. This age-related condition is a major source of chronic low back pain.

A herniated disk, sometimes, but incorrectly, called a slipped disk, is widely held to be the most common cause of severe back pain and sciatica. A disk in the lumbar area becomes herniated when it ruptures or thins out and degenerates to the point that the gel within the disk (nucleus pulposus) pushes outward. The damaged disk can take many forms.

A bulge -- The gel has been pushed out slightly from the disk and is evenly distributed around the circumference.
Protrusion -- The gel has pushed out slightly and asymmetrically in different places.
Extrusion -- The gel balloons extensively into the area outside the vertebrae or breaks off from the disk.

There is some debate, however, about how pain develops from a herniated disk and how frequently it causes low back pain. Many people have disks that bulge or protrude and do not suffer back pain. Extrusion (which is less common than the other two conditions) is highly associated with back pain, since the gel is likely to extend out far enough to press against the nerve root, most often the sciatic nerve. Extrusion is very uncommon, however, while sciatic and low-back pain are very common. But there may be other causes of low back pain

Ordinarily, at the time of any injury, the immune system triggers key factors that are designed to promote healing. Evidence is now pointing to an abnormal and persistent immune response in the cells of the nucleus pulposus that may be responsible for nerve injury and pain in the lower back. In such cases, the nucleus pulposus in the herniated disk overproduces certain factors known as cytokines -- notably tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -- that, in high levels, cause inflammation and cell damage. Evidence now suggests that such cytokines cause a biochemical reaction in the regions surrounding the bulging or protruded nucleus pulposus, which results in pain.

Abnormalities in the Annular Ring. Research has also focused on tears in the annular ring -- the fibrous band that surrounds and protects the disk. The annular ring contains a dense nerve network and high levels of peptides that heighten perception of pain. Tears in the annular ring are a frequent finding in patients with degenerative disk disease. Some cases of chronic low back pain may be caused by inward growth of nerve fibers into the annular ring, which triggers pain within the intervertebral disk.

At some time, up to 40% of people have pain called sciatica. This condition occurs when the sciatic nerve is trapped or inflamed.

The Sciatic Nerve. The sciatic nerve has an extensive pathway.

It first branches from the nerve roots that descend off the lowest part of the spinal cord (in the lumbar and sacral areas). Each of the two branches of the sciatic nerve is about as wide as a thumb.
Each branch of the nerve threads through the pelvis and deep into either side of the buttocks.
The nerve branches then pass down each hip and along the back of each thigh to the foot.

Causes of Sciatica. A herniated disk pressing on the sciatic nerve is the most common cause of sciatica, although spinal stenosis or other vertebral abnormalities that press on the sciatic nerve can also cause pain.

The main nerve traveling down the leg is the sciatic nerve. Pain associated with the sciatic nerve usually originates when nerve roots in the spinal cord become compressed or damaged. Symptoms can include tingling, numbness, or pain that radiates to the buttocks, legs, and feet.

Symptoms of Sciatica

Pain due to sciatica can vary widely. It may feel like a mild tingling, dull ache, or a burning sensation. In some cases, the pain is severe enough to cause immobility.

The pain most often occurs on one side. Some people have sharp pain in one part of the leg or hip and numbness in other parts. The affected leg may feel weak.

The pain often starts slowly. Sciatica pain may get worse:

At night
After standing or sitting for long periods of time
When sneezing, coughing, or laughing
After bending backwards or walking more than 50 - 100 yards (particularly if it is caused by spinal stenosis)

Sciatica pain usually goes away within 6 weeks, unless there are serious underlying conditions. Pain that lasts longer than 30 days, or gets worse with sitting, coughing, sneezing, or straining may indicated a longer recovery.

Other than age-related degenerative disk disorders, injuries in the muscles and ligaments supporting the back are the major causes of low back pain. Of note, is the iliac crest pain syndrome (iliolumbar syndrome), in which there are tears in the ligaments that help support the pelvic bone.

Spinal stenosis is the narrowing of the spinal canal. This typically develops as a person ages and the disks become drier and start to shrink. At some point in this process, any disruption, such as a minor injury that results in disk inflammation, can cause impingement on the nerve root and trigger pain. Pain from spinal stenosis can occur in both legs, or it can be felt as sciatica. Spinal stenosis occurs mostly in the elderly with degenerative osteoarthritis, but it can sometimes be caused by other problems, including infection and birth defects.

Spondylosis is a condition in which the fourth or fifth lumbar vertebrae degenerate or develop small fractures. This condition affects 4 - 6% of the general population, and the rates may be higher in certain populations. As it progresses, the spine can become unstable and lead to spondylolisthesis, in which one vertebra slips forward over the other and causes sciatica. The condition most often occurs in older individuals with women having a higher risk than men. It is also a common cause of back pain from stress fractures in young athletes and can also be due to inherited problems, injury, or bone disease.

Some cases of sciatica pain may occur when a muscle located deep in the buttocks pinches the sciatic nerve. This muscle is called the piriformis. The resulting condition is called piriformis syndrome. Piriformis syndrome usually develops after an injury. In rare cases leg swelling, deep-vein blood clots, or both may occur. Piriformis syndrome is sometimes difficult to diagnose.

Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic inflammation of the spine that may gradually result in a fusion of vertebrae. Symptoms include a slow development of back discomfort, with pain lasting for more than 3 months. The back is usually stiff in the morning; pain improves with exercise. In severe cases, the patient must continually stoop over. It can be quite mild, however, and it rarely affects a person's ability to work. It occurs mostly in young Caucasians in their mid-20s. The disease is more common in men, but about 30% of the cases are in women. Researchers believe that in most cases it is hereditary. About 20% of people with inflammatory bowel disease and about 20% of people with psoriasis develop a form of ankylosing spondylitis. There are few effective treatments for this potentially disabling disease, although etanercept (Enbrel) and infliximab (Remicade), anti-inflammatory agents known as TNF-blockers, are proving to be beneficial.

Any abnormality in joints, vertebrae, or nerve roots can cause back pain:

The facet (z-joints) joints can wear down. In such cases, pain occurs on arching the back or when walking.
In some cases a segment (consisting of two vertebrae and their common joint and disk) becomes unstable when its parts wear down.
Injury to nerve roots, notably deep root ganglia (nerve cells in the spine whose fibers extend from skin to muscle tissue), may be important in some cases. Some patients may have scar tissue that traps the nerve roots in the lower spine and causes sciatica.

Risk Factors

In most known cases, pain begins with an injury, after lifting a heavy object, or after making a sudden movement. Not all people have back pain after such events, however. In the majority of back pain cases, the causes are unknown.

Some evidence suggests that after episodes of back pain, some people may experience changes in brain structure and chemicals that produce an exaggerated response in nerve cells. In fact, a 2005 study suggested that chronic back pain actually shrinks the brain by as much as 11%. Such brain changes may cause a persistent perception of pain even though the actual injury has healed.

German researchers have found that chronic back pain appears to be linked to tiny structural changes in the brain. Using a specialized imaging method, they learned that persons with chronic back pain seemed to have a different, more complex structure to their brain and more activity in the areas involved in pain processing and emotional responses. It is unclear if the brain changes occurred before the pain or in response to the pain.

A number of conditions may make people more or less susceptible to low back pain.

Intervertebral disks begin deteriorating and growing thinner by age 30. One-third of adults over 20 show signs of herniated disks (although only 3% of these disks cause symptoms). As people continue to age and the disks lose moisture and shrink, the risk for spinal stenosis increases. The incidence of low back pain and sciatica increases in women at the time of menopause as they lose bone density. In older adults, osteoporosis and osteoarthritis are also common. However, the risk for low back pain does not mount steadily with ever-increasing age, which suggests that at a certain point, the conditions causing low back pain plateau.

Inherited Spinal Structure Abnormalities. Many people have a genetic susceptibility to low back pain, usually from inheriting spinal structural abnormalities.

Inherited Weakened Disks. Studies are finding that specific mutations of the COL9A gene may play a role in about 10% of sciatica cases. The gene is normally involved in producing collagen, the protein building block in all structural tissue in the body. When defective, it may cause the disk to be less able to resist compressive forces. One 2001 study found the defective gene was present in twice as many patients with disk problems as in patients without back pain.

The likelihood of experiencing back pain increases as children age. Some studies suggest that pain is more common among girls than boys. A common cause of temporary back pain is carrying backpacks that are too heavy for children. Backpacks should not weigh more than 20% of the child's body weight. They should weigh even less for very young children. Emotional or behavioral problems may also contribute to back pain in children.

Jobs that involve lifting, bending, and twisting into awkward positions, as well as those that cause whole-body vibration (usually due to long-distance truck driving), place workers at particular risk for low back pain. The longer a person continues such a job, the higher the risk. Some workers wear back support belts, but evidence strongly suggests that they are useful only for people who are currently have low back pain. The belts offer little added support for the back and do not prevent back injuries. In one study, workers who wore the belt for prevention reported more back pain than the workers who did not wear them.

A number of companies are developing programs to protect against back injuries. Although studies are mixed on the outcome of company interventions, one analysis suggested that they do have a positive effect. Employers and workers should make every effort to create a safe working environment. Office workers should have chairs, desks, and equipment that support the back or help maintain good posture.

Infections. A number of common and uncommon infections are a cause of back pain. Chronic uterine or pelvic infections can cause low back pain in women. Osteomyelitis is infection in the spine, a rare cause of back pain. Other infections that cause back pain include Lyme disease, septic arthritis, bacterial endocarditis, Reiter syndrome, mycobacterial, fungal arthritis, and viral arthritis. Chlamydia pneumonia, an atypical organism that is a common cause of mild pneumonia in young adults, is now believed to cause widespread inflammation in the body's tissue, including blood vessels, and may be responsible for a number of chronic conditions, including heart disease. Some evidence further suggests it may cause inflammation in arteries of the lower spine and contribute to spinal stenosis.

Many medical conditions are associated with back pain.

Osteoporosis is a disease of the skeleton in which the amount of calcium present in the bones slowly decreases to the point where the bones become fragile and prone to fracture. It usually does not cause pain unless the vertebrae collapse suddenly, in which case the pain is often severe. Studies indicate, however, that the incidence of low back pain and sciatica increase around the time of menopause, and very tiny fractures in the vertebrae caused by osteoporosis may be an undetected cause of back pain in many elderly women.
Osteoarthritis occurs in joints where cartilage is damaged and then destroyed, usually as a result of aging. In reaction to this destruction, the bones associated with the joints develop abnormalities. When osteoarthritis affects the spine, it may damage the cartilage in the disks, the moving joints of the spine, or both. The nerves may become pinched, causing pain and in advanced cases, numbness and muscle weakness. The patient may also experience muscle spasms and diminished mobility.
Inflammatory disorders, such as Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis, can produce inflammation in the spine (sacroiliitis), although the spine is less commonly affected than other locations.
Other conditions that can directly cause pain include fibromyalgia, Paget's disease, Parkinson's disease, abscesses, blood clots, and cancer.
Other medical conditions cause referred back pain, which occurs in conjunction with problems in organs unrelated to the spine (although usually located near it). Such conditions include ulcers, kidney disease (including kidney stones), ovarian cysts, and pancreatitis.

Osteoporosis is a condition characterized by progressive loss of bone density, thinning of bone tissue and increased vulnerability to fractures. Osteoporosis may result from disease, dietary or hormonal deficiency or advanced age. Regular exercise and vitamin and mineral supplements can reduce and even reverse loss of bone density.

It should be noted, however, that a number of medical conditions, such as lung and heart problems and chronic headaches, commonly occur with low back pain. A causal relationship among them, however, is uncertain.

Persistent low back pain in children is more likely to have a serious cause that requires treatment than back pain in adults. According to one small study, one third of children being treated at a hospital for back pain were found to have serious underlying problems.

Stress fractures (spondylolysis) in the spine are a common cause of back pain in young athletes. Sometimes a fracture may not show up for a week or two after an injury. Spondylolysis can cause spondylolisthesis, a condition in which the spine becomes unstable and the vertebrae slip over each other.

Hyperlordosis is an inborn exaggerated inward curve in the lumbar area. Scoliosis, an abnormal curvature of the spine in children, does not usually cause back pain.

Juvenile chronic arthropathy is an inherited form of arthritis. It can cause pain in the sacrum and hip joints of children and young people. It used to be grouped under juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, but is now defined as a separate problem.

Injuries, benign tumors such as osteoblastoma or neurofibroma and cancers, including leukemia, can also cause back pain in children.

Medications may trigger back pain. For example, anticoagulants can cause bleeding or an internal bruise. Long-term steroid use can cause infection or compression fractures.

Some research is suggesting that some people have motor control abnormalities in the deep muscles near the spine. Such lack of control causes instability in the spine that can lead to pain.

Pregnant women are prone to back pain due to a shifting of abdominal organs, the forward redistribution of body weight, and the loosening of ligaments in the pelvic area as the body prepares for delivery. Tall women are at higher risk than short women. Although some earlier research had suggested that the use of epidurals for pain relief during labor could lead to chronic back pain, studies in 2002 reported no increased risk.

Psychological factors are known to play a strong influential role in three phases of low back pain:

Some evidence suggests preexisting depression and the inability to cope may be more likely to predict the onset of pain than physical problems. For example, a British study reported that people who showed emotional distress at age 23 were nearly twice as likely to suffer from back pain 10 years later. A 2005 study found that a “passive” coping style (not wanting to confront problems) was strongly associated with the risk of developing disabling neck or low back pain.
The perception of pain. Social and psychological factors play a role in the severity of a person's perception of back pain. For example, one study compared truck drivers and bus drivers. Nearly all the truck drivers liked their work. Half of them reported low back pain but only 24% lost time at work. Bus drivers, on the other hand, reported much lower job satisfaction than truck drivers, and these workers with back pain had a significantly higher absentee rate than truck drivers in spite of less stress on their backs. Similarly, another study found that pilots, who generally reported "loving their jobs," reported far fewer back problems than their flight crews. And yet another study reported that low rank, low social support, and high stress in soldiers was associated with a higher risk for disabling back pain.
Chronic pain. Depression and a tendency to develop physical complaints in response to stress also increase the likelihood that acute back pain will become a chronic condition. The way a patient perceives and copes with pain at the beginning of an acute attack may actually condition the patient to either recover or develop a chronic condition. Those who over-respond to pain and fear for their long-term outlook tend to feel out of control and become discouraged, increasing their risk for long-term problems.

Studies also suggest that patients who reported prolonged emotional distress have less favorable outcomes after back surgeries. It should be strongly noted that the presence of psychological factors in no way diminishes the reality of the pain and its disabling effects. Recognizing it as a strong player in many cases of low back pain, however, can help determine the full range of treatment options.

Diagnosis

Because nearly all cases of low back pain clear up in a short time and are not due to serious problems, a medical history and a brief physical examination are almost always sufficient.

Still, with very severe or chronic back pain, it is important that any serious medical causes as well as cauda equina syndrome and progressive nerve damage be ruled out first. If the doctor suspects a serious underlying cause, the approach to determining the origin of back pain involves answering three questions:

Is some general medical disorder present that could be causing the pain?
Are there social or emotional factors that might be intensifying the pain?
Are the nerves in the spine involved in the pain (such as in sciatica)?

Such questions can usually be answered with a medical history and physical examination.

A patient should report any serious health problems and concerns during a medical and family history, especially those listed below.

Previous episodes of back pain
Any injuries or accidents involving the neck, back, or hips
History of cancer
Unexplained weight loss or chronic infection
The frequency, duration, and nature of the back pain
When the back pain occurs
What triggered the pain (such as lifting a heavy object)
Conditions that make the pain worse such as coughing
Any situation that relieves the pain
Urination of bowel movement problems
Other relevant symptoms such as morning stiffness, weakness, or numbness in the legs.

The main goal of a physician exam is to try and determine the source of the pain and to determine limits of movement.

Patients are asked to sit, stand, and walk in different ways (flat-footed, on the toes, and on their heels).
In some cases they are asked to walk on a treadmill to test for weakness in toe or heel walking (which may indicate stenosis).
Patients will be requested to bend forward, backward, and sideways and to twist.
Patients will be asked to lift their leg straight up while lying down. The doctor will also move the patient's legs in different positions and bend and straighten the knees. (Pain caused by sciatica can be intensified by lifting the affected leg straight in the air. It is usually sharp, localized, and accompanied by numbness or tingling. Pain caused by inflammation is duller and more generalized and not affected by lifting a straight leg.)
The doctor may measure the circumference of the calves and thighs to look for muscle deterioration.
To test nerve function and reflexes, doctors will tap the knees and ankles with a rubber hammer. The doctor may also touch parts of the body lightly with a pin, cotton swab, or feather to test for numbness and nerve sensitivity.

Because most patients with back pain are on the mend or completely recovered within 6 weeks, imaging techniques such as x-rays or scans are rarely recommended in the first month unless a tumor, fracture, infection, cauda equina syndrome, or progressive neurologic disease is suspected.

Patients who have the following symptoms or experienced certain events may need imaging studies.

Pain that lasts more than a month
Very severe or progressive pain, numbness
Muscle weakness
A previous accident or injury that might have affected the back
A history of cancer
Indications of an underlying disease such as fever or unexplained weight loss
Pain that occurs in patients over 65 years of age

If these conditions exist, usually an x-ray is used first. If results are inconclusive, either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be performed. (Ultrasound is not useful.)

X-Rays. Although many patients with acute and uncomplicated low back pain believe that plain x-rays of the spinal column are important in a diagnosis, they are not very helpful in most patients except for reducing anxiety. If pain persists after 6 - 8 weeks, then x-rays are usually warranted. In such cases, x-rays may reveal signs of injury, infection, tumors, stenosis, or changes in the vertebrae that may be causing inflammation or compression on the nerve. There are many different types of x-rays for the spine.

A diskography is an x-ray of the disk. This procedure requires injections into disks suspected of being the source of pain and disks nearby. It can be painful and is generally only used for patients who are undergoing back surgery to identify the location of the injured disk.
An x-ray myelogram is an x-ray of the spine that requires a spinal injection of a special dye and the need to lie still for several hours to avoid a very painful headache. It has value only for select patients with pain on moving and standing. It has largely been replaced by CT and MRI scans.

CT stands for computerized tomography. In this procedure, a thin x-ray beam is rotated around the area of the body to be visualized. Using very complicated mathematical processes called algorithms the computer is able to generate a 3-D image of a section through the body. CT scans are very detailed and provide excellent information for the doctor.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide very well-defined images of soft tissue and bone. It is not painful, but some people may feel claustrophobic in scanners that are fully enclosed. MRIs can detect annular tears, or disk fragments, and non-spinal causes of back pain, including infection and cancer. However, MRIs are no more effective than x-rays in identifying arthritis, and they are more expensive. Some medical evidence suggests that relying on MRI images of disk abnormalities to determine treatment has resulted in many unnecessary surgeries. At least 40% of all adults have bulging or protruding vertebral disks, and most have no back pain. The degree of disk abnormalities revealed by MRIs often have very little to do with the severity of the pain or the need for surgery. Disk abnormalities in people who have back pain may simply be a coincidence rather than an indication for treatment.

Click the icon to see an image of a MRI machine.

Advanced imaging techniques should be used only when underlying infection, cancer, or nerve involvement is suspected.

Magnetic Resonance Neurography. This imaging exam looks at the nerves in the pelvic area. Researchers reporting in the Journal of Neurosurgery found that it helped reveal pinched nerves that can cause leg pain. The findings could lead to new ways to diagnose sciatica and piriformis syndrome.

Bone Scintigraphy and SPECT Imaging.In rare cases, doctors may use bone scintigraphy (bone scanning) to determine abnormalities in the bones. The technique may be useful for early detection of spinal fractures, cancer that has spread to the bone, or osteoarthritis. During this exam, a small amount of radioactive material is injected into a vein. It circulates through the body, and is absorbed by the bones. The bones can then be visualized using x-rays or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). A study in the February 2006 journal Radiology found that SPECT can help determine which patients would get low back pain relief from spinal injections. Forty-seven patients were randomly divided into two groups: One group received SPECT before they were scheduled for an injection, the other group did not. Those who showed spinal problems on the SPECT images received an injection in the area of the abnormalities. Those who had a normal SPECT, as well as those who did not have the test at all, received injections in the area recommended by their referring physician. After a month, those who had targeted injections using the SPECT images had greater pain relieve than those who did not.

Electrodiagnostic tests that analyze the electric waveforms of nerves and muscles may be useful for detecting nerve abnormalities that may be causing back pain and identifying possible injuries. They are also useful to determine if any abnormal structural findings on an MRI or other imaging test have real significance as a cause of the back pain. It should be noted that any nerve injuries that affect these tests may not be present for 2 - 4 weeks after symptoms begin.

Nerve conduction studies and electromyography are the electrodiagnostic tests most commonly performed.

Nerve Conduction Studies. To perform nerve conduction studies, surface electrodes are attached to the skin. Small electric shocks are then applied to measure the speed of nerve conduction.

Electromyography. To perform electromyography, a fine, sterile, wire electrode is inserted briefly into a muscle and the electrical activity is displayed on a viewing screen. Electromyography can be quite painful, and some experts question, in fact, whether it adds any valuable diagnostic information. They suggest it be limited to unusual cases or when other tests indicate that the condition is aggressive and may increase the risk for rapid, significant injury.

Blood and urine samples may be used to test for infections, arthritis, or other conditions.

Injecting a drug that blocks pain into the nerves in the back helps locate the level in the spine where problems occur.

A procedure called a facet block is also useful in locating areas of specific damage.

Provocative diskometry is a test that uses an injection of saline solution into the suspected disk to reproduce the pain, which is then followed by injection of an anesthetic to dull the pain.

Medications

The most commonly prescribed medications for the treatment of back pain are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). These drugs block prostaglandins, the substances that dilate blood vessels and cause inflammation and pain. Evidence suggests that short-term use of NSAIDs brings effective relief in patients with acute back pain. The benefits for chronic back pain are less certain.

There are dozens of NSAIDs. The most common are the following:

Over-the-counter NSAIDs include aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil, Nuprin, Motrin IB, Rufen), naproxen (Aleve), ketoprofen (Actron, Orudis KT).
Prescription NSAIDs include ibuprofen (Motrin), naproxen (Naprosyn, Anaprox), flurbiprofen (Ansaid), diclofenac (Voltaren), tolmetin (Tolectin), ketoprofen (Orudis, Oruvail), nabumetone (Relafen), dexibuprofen (Seractil), and indomethacin (Indocin).
Topical NSAIDs delivered in gels, creams, or patches do not appear to provide any long-term benefits in reducing arthritic pain.

Many experts now recommend that patients who take NSAIDs by mouth only do so for a short period of time. A 2004 review published in the British Medical Journal suggested that long-term use of NSAIDs does not actually reduce osteoarthritis pain and may increase patients’ risk of experiencing side effects. High dosages of NSAIDs can cause heart problems such as increased blood pressure, kidney problems, and stomach bleeding.

In April 2005, the FDA asked drug manufacturers of prescription NSAIDs to place an alert on their medicines warning people that the drugs have been linked to an increased risk for cardiovascular events and gastrointestinal bleeding. The FDA also requested manufacturers of OTC NSAIDs to revise their labels to include more specific language concerning potential cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks. Aspirin does not contain such warning labels.

Long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is the second most common cause of ulcers and the rate of NSAID-caused ulcers is increasing. Ulcers caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are also more likely to bleed than those caused by the bacterium H. pylori.

Doctors cannot predict which patients taking these drugs will develop bleeding.

Among the groups at high risk for bleeding are elderly people, anyone with a history of ulcers of GI bleeding, patients with serious heart conditions, alcohol abusers, and those on certain medications, such anticoagulants ("blood thinners"), corticosteroids, or bisphosphonates (drugs used for osteoporosis).

Proton-pump inhibitors may help to prevent and heal ulcers caused by NSAIDs. Proton-pump inhibitors include omeprazole (Prilosec), esomeprazole (Nexium), and lansoprazole (Prevacid).

An ulcer is a crater-like lesion on the skin or mucous membrane that is caused by an inflammatory, infectious, or cancerous condition. To avoid irritating an ulcer, stop smoking and try to eliminate certain substances from your diet, including caffeine and alcohol. Prescription medicines are available to suppress the acid in the stomach that causes erosion of the stomach lining. Endoscopic therapy can be used to stop ulcer-related bleeding.

Coxibs block an inflammation-promoting enzyme called COX-2. This drug class was initially thought to work as well as NSAIDs, while causing less gastrointestinal distress. However, following numerous reports of cardiovascular events, gastrointestinal problems, and skin rashes, the FDA is currently re-evaluating the relative risks and benefits of this drug class. Rofecoxib (Vioxx) and valdecoxib (Bextra) have been withdrawn from the United States market. Celecoxib (Celebrex) is still available, but patients should ask their doctor if this drug is appropriate and safe for them.

Tramadol (Ultram) is a pain reliever that has been used as an alternative to opioids. It has opioid-like properties, but is not as addictive. (Dependence and abuse have been reported, however.) It can cause nausea, but does not cause the severe gastrointestinal problems that NSAIDs can. Some patients who take tramadol experience severe itching. A combination of tramadol and acetaminophen (Ultracet) is now available. It provides more rapid pain relief than tramadol alone.

Narcotics are pain-relieving and sleep-inducing drugs that act on the central nervous system. They are the most powerful medications available for the management of pain.

There are two types of narcotics:

Opiates are derived from natural opium such as morphine and codeine.
Opioids are synthetic drugs and include oxycodone (Percodan, Percocet, Oxycontin), hydrocodone (Vicodin), and oxymorphone (Numorphan).

Novel ways to deliver pain medicine have been developed. A skin patch containing an opioid called transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic) may relieve chronic back pain more effectively than oral opioids. For very severe pain, a small, patient-controlled pump called SynchroMed may be used. This device is implanted under the skin in the abdomen and delivers pulses of pain-relieving opioids to the spinal canal.

Common side effects of opioids include anxiety, constipation, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, paranoia, urinary retention, restlessness, and labored or slow breathing. Addiction is a risk, although less than is commonly believed when these medications are used for pain relief. In fact, when prescribed properly, use of opioids for chronic pain can be safer in some cases than on-going use of NSAIDs. Unfortunately, opioid abuse among young people is a major concern. Unless the pain is very severe, experts advise against routinely prescribing opioids.

Injections of different substances are sometimes used to treat low back pain caused by nerve impingement. The injection is usually an epidural, which is directed into the spaces between the outer membrane of the spine and the vertebrae. None of these substances cure the problem.

Corticosteroids. An injection of a corticosteroid (commonly called a steroid) is directed as close to the injured location as possible. Corticosteroids reduce inflammation. This approach may temporarily relieve sciatic pain until the body heals itself. Studies that measure the benefits of steroids on sciatica or low back pain are conflicting. There is some evidence that patients can experience rebound pain within a few months. Some experts have also raised concerns that even a single injection can cause serious and painful side effects, including meningitis and inflammation, although such risks are very low.
Hypertonic saline (salt water solution). Epidural injections of saline are being investigated for breaking up scar tissue. One 2001 study compared targeted injections of saline and steroids directed at the nerve root. Although steroid injections had more immediate benefits, both products offered improvement. By the third month, patients who had saline injections experienced less pain than the steroid group. A 2003 study found that epidural corticosteroid injections provided no greater benefit than saline injections for patients with sciatica.
Local anesthetics. Injections of anesthetics such as Xylocaine or bupivacaine may help some patients, although studies on their benefits are mixed.
Botulinum. Researchers are investigating whether injections of botulinum toxin (Botox) in the lower back can safely and effectively relieve pain. Very small amounts of Botox temporarily paralyzes muscle tissue. Botox is commonly used to smooth out wrinkles. Some studies have suggested that Botox may be very helpful in relieving chronic low back pain and sciatica caused by piriformis syndrome. In a 2001 study, the benefits of Botox injections for low back pain subsided within 6 months.

A 2002 review of studies concluded that antidepressants may lessen pain severity in some patients, although they had little effect on daily functioning. Antidepressants called tricyclics can be effective painkillers in non-depressed people with chronic back pain. Such antidepressants include amitriptyline (Elavil, Endep), desipramine (Norpramin), doxepin (Sinequan), imipramine (Tofranil), amoxapine (Asendin), nortriptyline (Pamelor, Aventyl), and maprotiline (Ludiomil). It should be noted that tricyclics can have severe side effects. Nonetheless, experts believe there is a useful role for these drugs that warrants further investigation.

A combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and muscle relaxants such as cyclobenzaprine (Flexeril), diazepam (Valium), carisoprodol (Soma), or methocarbamol (Robaxin) are sometimes used for patients with acute low back pain. Medical evidence has found that they can help relieve non-specific low back pain, but some experts have warned that these drugs should be used cautiously, since they target the brain, not the muscles. Patients who take muscle relaxants may experience a number of central nervous system side effects such as drowsiness. The muscle relaxant Soma can be addictive and does little more than produce sleep.

Tumor-Necrosis Factor (TNF) Modifiers. TNF modifiers block the action of tumor necrosis factor, a protein involved in inflammatory response. Because of their anti-inflammatory properties, TNF modifier drugs are being investigated for the treatment of the nerve dysfunction and pain that occurs in sciatica. Some small studies indicate that infliximab (Remicade) may help reduce sciatica pain. Early studies suggest that another TNF modifier, etanercept (Enbrel), may be useful for treating sciatica and back pain. TNF modifiers are powerful drugs that can cause severe side effects.

Lidocaine Patch. A skin patch containing lidocaine, a local anesthetic, has been used specifically for herpes zoster pain. Early studies suggest that this patch, called Lidoderm, may provide significant relief for people who suffer from low back pain with very few adverse effects, even with continuous use of four patches a day. If further studies support its benefits, the patch could prove to be an important treatment

NO-NSAIDs. NO-NSAIDs are drugs that combine NSAIDs and nitric oxide (NO), a substance that enhances blood flow to the stomach and increases levels of protective mucus and bicarbonate. These agents show particular promise in providing pain relief and reducing the risk for GI problems.

Generally, manufacturers of herbal remedies and dietary supplements do not need FDA approval to sell their products. Just like a drug, herbs and supplements can affect the body's chemistry, and therefore have the potential to produce side effects that may be harmful. There have been a number of reported cases of serious and even lethal side effects from herbal products. Always check with your doctor before using any herbal remedies or dietary supplements.

Most herbal remedies used for back pain have both pain-relief and anti-inflammatory effects. Popular herbs for back pain relief include:

White willow bark (Salix alba) contains salicylates, the same chemicals found in aspirin.
Bromelain is an enzyme found in pineapple.
Boswellia (Boswellia serrata) is an herb commonly used in Indian Ayurvedic medicine.
Devil’s claw (Harpagophytum procumbens) is an African herb sometimes used to relieve arthritic pain.

White willow bark, bromelain, and Boswellia have blood-thinning properties and can interfere with anticoagulant medications such as warfarin (Coumadin).

Complementary and Alternative Medicine

A number of complementary and alternative treatments are used to relieve back pain. Complementary means it is used together with conventional medicine. Alternative means it is done in place of conventional medicine.

Acupuncture is now a common alternative treatment for certain kinds of pain. It involves inserting small needles or exerting pressure on certain "energy" points in the body. When the pins have been placed successfully, the patient is supposed to experience a sensation that brings a feeling of fullness, numbness, tingling, and warmth with some soreness around the acupuncture point. Unfortunately, rigorous studies of acupuncture are difficult to perform, and most evidence on its benefits is weak. In any case, it may be specifically helpful for certain patients with back pain, such as pregnant women, who must avoid medications. Anyone who undergoes acupuncture should be sure it is performed in a reputable location by experienced practitioners who use sterilized equipment.

Click the icon to see an image of acupuncture.

A number of well-conducted studies have supported the benefits of massage therapy for patients with chronic or acute back pain, especially when it is combined with exercise and patient education. In fact, one analysis in 2003 suggested it may reduce the costs of care. However, it is usually not covered by insurance.

According to a 2001 review of studies, only intensive programs that include both psychological and physical rehabilitation therapies were successful in reducing chronic low back pain and improving function. A number of effective approaches to low back pain -- collectively called mind-body techniques -- employ psychological, behavioral, or physical methods to promote relaxation and reduce stress. Although many may be helpful, evidence is lacking on the specific approaches that would be most successful and which patients would most likely benefit.

Stress Reduction. Stress reducing techniques, including relaxation methods and meditation, may be helpful. One study, for example, reported that meditation was beneficial in reducing pain and improving mood among chronic pain sufferers who had not responded to traditional care. Another found that after 3 weeks, patients who were in pain after back surgery had less discomfort and slept better after practicing relaxation imagery techniques while listening to music for 25 minutes a day.

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. Studies report that a course of cognitive-behavioral therapy helps reduce chronic back pain or at least enhances the patient's ability to deal with it. The primary goal of this form of therapy in such cases is to change the distorted perceptions that patients have of themselves and their approach to pain. Using specific tasks and self-observation, patients gradually shift their fixed ideas that they are helpless against the pain that dominates their lives to the perception that pain is only one negative and, to a degree, a manageable experience among many positive ones. In one study, therapists also taught relaxation techniques and methods to improve posture. The sessions lasted for 2.5 hours each week for 12 weeks. More research is needed.

Patient Education and Support Groups. A 2002 study reported that patients with chronic low back pain who participated in an expert-moderated e-mail support and discussion group had less pain and disability after 12 months. An Australian massive public-health campaign that educated patients and doctors about the importance of staying active and dispelled fears about long-term impairment from back pain dramatically reduced disability and worker compensation claims.

Spinal Manipulation for Uncomplicated Acute Low Back Pain. Spinal manipulation may be useful for acute back pain that persists beyond 2 - 3 weeks. There are a number of variations, but one example of a spinal manipulation technique is the following:

The patient first lies on their side.
The practitioner grasps the exposed shoulder and either the hip or knee and then presses the upper and lower portions of the body in opposite directions, so that the torso rotates.
The shifting vertebrae make a cracking or popping sound, indicating that they have exceeded the normal range of motion.
Often this results in a greater sense of ease and mobility. (The effect, however, may be temporary.)

Whether on-going manipulations relieve pain better that just one visit is a subject of debate. Some patients consider spinal manipulation to be highly effective for chronic low back pain. A major 2003 analysis, however, reported that current evidence did not support the benefits of spinal manipulation over general medical care or physical therapy for either acute or chronic back pain. [It was better than sham (fake) therapy, however.]

Spinal manipulations are typically performed by chiropractors, but osteopathic doctors also perform them.

One in three people with low back pain seek treatment from a chiropractor. Chiropractic was founded in the U.S. in the late 1800s. The specific goal of chiropractors is to perform spinal manipulations to improve nerve transmission. Many studies have now confirmed that patients feel more satisfied with their chiropractic care than with treatment from general practitioners.
Osteopathy was also founded in the 1800s. Its core approach to healing also involves physical manipulation. Osteopathy manipulates the bones, muscles, and tendons to optimize blood circulation. The general direction of osteopathy over the years has widened to employ a broader range of treatments that now approach those of standard medicine. One 1999 study reported that osteopathy was as effective as medical treatment in relieving low back pain and patients required far less medication and physical therapy. Osteopathic treatment was also far less expensive than traditional back pain treatments.

Both chiropractors and osteopaths offer verbal assurance and a precise treatment regimen. The direct physical connection through spinal manipulation reinforces the patient-practitioner relationship. The emotional effects of such connections may be as important for healing as the treatments themselves.

Mild and temporary side effects from spinal manipulation are common. The potential for serious adverse effects from low back manipulations is low. It should be strongly noted, however, that serious complications (including stroke or spinal cord or neck injury) have been reported with manipulations of the neck. Although little research has been done on such complications, an English survey indicated that they are more frequent than commonly thought.

Some chiropractors may take a lot of x-rays, particularly those of the full spine, which may have long-term harmful consequences. Patients should also be aware that some chiropractors use alternative treatments that have not been proven or rigorously studied. All patients should require objective evidence on the benefits of their treatments.

Vertebral Axial Decompression. Vertebral axial decompression (VAX-D) may reduce pain and improve function in patients with chronic low back pain, including sciatic pain that radiates down the leg. The patient lies face down on a special table, clutching hand grips and wearing a pelvic harness. The traction-like action alternately decompresses and relaxes the spine over 1-minute intervals. Each session lasts about 30 minutes. Ten to 20 sessions on successive days are often required. The procedure is thought to alleviate pain and enhance healing by relieving pressure within the disks, promoting the in-flow of oxygen, fluids, and nutrients to the spinal column. Some evidence supports its benefits, with reported success rates of around 70%. Because it is considered experimental, it is not yet covered by most insurers. More studies are needed to confirm its possible benefits.

Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy. A technique called percutaneous neuromodulation therapy (PNT) uses a small device delivers electrical stimulation to deep tissues and nerve pathways near the spine. It has shown some initial promise for relief of chronic back pain and may also improve mobility and sleep. Treatment sessions are conducted in the doctor's office and last about 30 minutes. A correct pattern of stimulation appears to be important for optimal relief and needs to be determined.

Electric Nerve Stimulation. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) uses low-level electrical pulses to suppress back pain. A variant, percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS), applies these pulses through a small needle to acupuncture points. The standard procedure is to give 80 - 100 pulses per second for 45 minutes three times a day. The patients are barely aware of the sensation. Although a 2002 analysis of trials could find no direct evidence of benefit, small studies have reported some relief for chronic low back pain from either TENS or PENS. It is not known if these effects are long lasting. Neither approach is helpful for relief of acute low back pain in most patients.

Muscle Stimulation. Two investigative procedures called automated or electrical twitch obtaining intramuscular stimulation (ATOIMS or ETOIMS) are showing promise. ATOIMS uses an automated mechanical device that vibrates the muscle using a tiny pin. (The sensation is described as similar to a mosquito bite.) ETOIMS uses an extremely mild electrical current. They can also be used together. Both approaches cause the muscles to twitch and then relax then the process is stopped. Discomfort is minimal. Small studies are reporting some help in relieving a number of condition the cause chronic pain, including low back pain.

Therapeutic ultrasound. Therapeutic ultrasound involves placing a small wand or probe directly onto the skin. The wand gives off sound waves, which gently vibration the area. Scientists in England are studying whether therapeutic ultrasound may help relieve pain and disability due to sciatica.

Intradiscal Electrothermal Treatment (IDET). Intradiscal electrothermal treatment (IDET) uses electricity to heat a painful disk. Heat is applied for about 15 minutes. Pain may temporarily feel worse, but after healing, the disk shrinks and becomes desensitized to pain. However, healing takes several weeks. The surgery may not work in obese patients.

Some studies have reported positive benefits to IDET; others say it does not significantly reduce pain. A randomized, blinded study published in the November 2005 journal Spine found that IDET was no better than a sham (fake) procedure in relieving chronic back pain due to disk disease. For the study, patients were randomly selected to receive either IDET or a sham procedure. After 6 months, there was no difference in pain symptoms between the two groups.

Exercise and Physical Therapy

Incorrect movements or long-term high-impact exercise is often a cause of back pain in the first place. People vulnerable to back pain should avoid activities that put undue stress on the lower back or require sudden twisting movements, such as football, golf, ballet, and weight lifting.

Exercise does not help acute back pain. In fact, overexertion may cause further harm.

An incremental aerobic exercise program (such as walking, stationary biking, swimming) may begin within 2 weeks of symptoms. Jogging is usually not recommended, at least not until the pain is gone and muscles are stronger.

Patients should avoid exercises that put the lower back under pressure until the back muscles are well toned. Such exercises include leg lifts done in a facedown position, straight leg sit-ups, and leg curls using exercise equipment.

In all cases, patients should never force themselves to exercise if, by doing so, the pain increases.

Exercise plays a very beneficial role in chronic back pain. Repetition is the key to increasing flexibility, building endurance, and strengthening the specific muscles needed to support and neutralize the spine. Exercise should be considered as part of a broader program to return to normal home, work, and social activities. In this way, the positive benefits of exercise not only affect strength and flexibility but they also alter and improve patients' attitudes toward their disability and pain. Exercise may also be effective when combined with a psychological and motivational program, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy.

There are different types of back pain exercises. A 2005 review in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that stretching exercises worked best for reducing pain, while strengthening exercises were best for improving function.

Back pain exercises include:

Low Impact Aerobic Exercises. Low-impact aerobic exercises, such as swimming, bicycling, and walking, can strengthen muscles in the abdomen and back without over-straining the back. Programs that use strengthening exercises while swimming may be a particularly beneficial approach for many patients with back pain. Medical research has shown that pregnant women who engaged in a water gymnastics program have less back pain and are able to continue working longer.
Lumbar Extension Strength Training. Exercises called lumbar extension strength training are proving to be effective. Generally, these exercises attempt to strengthen the abdomen, improve lower back mobility, strength, and endurance, and enhance flexibility in the hip and hamstring muscles and tendons at the back of the thigh.
Yoga, Tai Chi, Chi Kung. Practices originating in Asia that combine low-impact physical movements and meditation may be very helpful. They are designed to achieve a physical and mental balance and can be very helpful in preventing recurrences of low back pain.
Pilates, an exercise practice that uses yoga principles, may be specifically helpful.
Flexibility Exercises. Flexibility exercises may help reduce pain. A stretching program may work best when combined with strengthening exercises.
Retraining Deep Muscles. Some studies suggest a link between low back pain and impaired motor control of deep muscles of the back and trunk. According to these studies, contraction exercises specifically designed to retrain these muscles may be effective for patients with both acute and chronic pain.

Perform the following exercises at least three times a week:

Partial Sit-ups. Partial sit-ups or crunches strengthen the abdominal muscles.

Keep the knees bent and the lower back flat on the floor while raising the shoulders up 3- 6 inches.
Exhale on the way up and inhale on the way down.
Perform this exercise slowly 8 - 10 times with the arms across the chest.

Pelvic Tilt. The pelvic tilt alleviates tight or fatigued lower back muscles.

Lie on the back with the knees bent and feet flat on the floor.
Tighten the buttocks and abdomen so that they tip up slightly.
Press the lower back to the floor, hold for one second, and then relax.
Be sure to breathe evenly.

Over time increase this exercise until it is held for 5 seconds. Then, extend the legs a little more so that the feet are further away from the body and try it again.

Stretching Lower-Back Muscles. The following are three exercises for stretching the lower back:

Lie on the back with knees bent and legs together. Keeping arms at the sides, slowly roll the knees over to one side until totally relaxed. Hold this position for about 20 seconds (while breathing evenly) and then repeat on the other side.
Lying on the back, hold one knee and pull it gently toward the chest. Hold for 20 seconds. Repeat with the other knee.
While supported on hands and knees, lift and straighten right hand and left leg at the same time. Hold for 3 seconds while tightening the abdominal muscles. The back should be straight. Alternate with the other arm and leg and repeat on each side 8 - 20 times.

Note: No one with low back pain should perform exercises that require bending over right after getting up in the morning. At that time, the disks are more fluid-filled and more vulnerable to pressure from this movement.

Physical therapy with a trained professional may be useful if pain has not improved within the first 3 weeks. It is, in fact, important for any person who has chronic low back pain to have an exercise program guided by professionals who understand the limitations and special needs of back pain and who can address individual health conditions. One study indicated that patients who planned their own exercise did worse than those in physical therapy or doctor-directed programs.

Physical therapy typically includes the following:

The first stage involves patient education and training the patient in correct movement. Sometimes heat or electro-therapies (such as therapeutic ultrasound or low-energy lasers) are used, although their benefits are unproven.
If back pain persists beyond 5 weeks, physical therapy is used for rehabilitation. It uses exercises to help the patient keep the spine in neutral positions during all daily activities.

Surgery

Diskectomy is the surgical removal of the diseased disk. The procedure relieves pressure on the spine. It has been performed for 40 years with increasingly less invasive techniques being developed over time. However, few studies have been conducted to determine its real effectiveness. In appropriate candidates it provides faster immediate relief than medical treatment, but long-term benefits (over 5 years) are uncertain. A number of minimally invasive variations are now available.

When the soft, gelatinous central portion of an intervertebral disk is forced through a weakened part of a disk, it is called a slipped disk. Most slipped disks (herniated disks) take place in the lumbar area of the spine. Slipped disks are one of the most common causes of lower back pain. The mainstay of treatment is an initial period of rest with pain and anti-inflammatory medications followed by physical therapy. If pain and symptoms persist, surgery to remove the herniated portion of the intervertebral disk may be needed.

Microdiskectomy. Microdiskectomy is the current standard procedure. It is performed through a small incision (1 to 1-1/2 inch). The back muscles are lifted and moved away from the spine. After identifying and moving the nerve root, the surgeon removes the injured disk tissue under it. The procedure does not change any of the structural supports of the spine, including joints, ligaments, and muscles.

Other less invasive procedures that are available including the following:

Endoscopic Diskectomy. Endoscopy employs a catheter (a thin tube) that contains tiny cameras and surgical instruments that are inserted through small incisions. Various endoscopic approaches are proving to be useful for back surgery.
Percutaneous Diskectomy. Percutaneous diskectomy (PAD). This approach uses a tube with a device at the tip that cuts away some of the nucleus pulposus and a vacuum that then sucks this gelatinous matter out.
Laser Diskectomy. A number of investigative surgical procedures employ lasers. For example, endoscopic laser foraminoplasty (ELF) uses lasers to locate the likely source of pain and remove diseased tissue. The incision requires little more than a Band-Aid and complications are minimal. Long-term benefits are unknown, however.

It is not clear yet if any of these less-invasive procedures are any more effective than the standard microdiskectomy.

Complications and Outlook. Many patients still have back pain after diskectomy that delays discharge from the hospital. Narcotics are usually needed. Adding an injected NSAID may speed resolution of pain.

Scar tissue is a significant problem, since it can cause persistent low back pain afterward. Anti-scarring agents or certain devices may help reduce surgical scars and thereby postoperative pain. Other complications of spinal surgery can include nerve and muscle damage, infection, and the need for reoperation.

Patients now often remain in bed only 3 - 4 days after disk surgery. It may take 4 - 6 weeks for full recovery, however. Gentle exercise may be recommended at first. Starting intensive exercise 4 - 6 weeks after a first-time disk surgery appears to be very helpful for speeding up recovery.

Operations that remove a vertebra (laminectomy) or shave off part of one (laminotomy) may be used in certain cases of spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis to decompress the nerve. They may also be used to remove benign tumors on the spine.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing lumbar spinal surgery.

Although either procedure often brings immediate relief from pain, a 1999 statistical study suggested that it is inappropriately performed in 60% or more of sciatica cases. There are small risks to the operation, and it is not always successful. Some recurrence of back pain and sciatica occurs in half to two-thirds of postoperative patients. Minimally invasive variations are under investigation.

In cases where abnormal vertebrae position or movement is responsible for severe and chronic back pain, such as spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis, surgeons may fuse vertebrae together. Fusion uses a bone graft or some other device to join the vertebrae together. In a 2001 study of patients with severe long-term back pain, 33% of patients who had spinal fusion had less back pain after 2 years, compared to 7% who received conservative treatment with physical therapy. Pain improved most in the 6 months following surgery. However, a 2005 clinical trial found that spinal fusion surgery worked no better than intensive rehabilitation in reducing disability. The intensive rehabilitation program included both physical and cognitive-behavioral therapy.

Many spinal fusion surgeries use a tiny hollow metal cage, which is implanted into the disk space. Bone is then removed from the patient's hip and packed inside the cage. Over time the bone grows through the holes and around the device, fusing the vertebrae. Alternatively, rather than performing a bone graft, the cage is filled with a sponge-like material containing a genetically-engineered protein called InFuse (rhBMP-2) that promotes bone to grow.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing spinal fusion.

A number of video-assisted techniques have been developed. The new techniques are less invasive than standard "open" surgical approaches, which uses wide incisions. To date, however, the newer procedures have higher complication rates than the open approaches and some medical centers have abandoned them.

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty. Percutaneous vertebroplasty involves the injection of a cement-like bone substitute into vertebrae with compression fractures. It is done under endoscopic and x-ray guidance. The technique is proving useful for stabilizing the spine and relieving pain in patients with spinal compression fractures due to osteoporosis or cancer. A Mayo Clinic study found that patients who have the procedure have less back pain during rest and activity. A survey of records from more than 100 vertebroplasty patients revealed that most patients are more functional than before the procedure, and the benefits lasted for up to a year. Warning: The FDA has warned consumers that polymethylmethacrylate bone cement, used during vertebroplasty, could leak. Such leakage could cause damage to soft tissues and nerves. It is extremely important that the patient is sure that the health care provider has had significant experience performing the vertebroplasty procedure.

Percutaneous kyphoplasty. The health care provider injects bone cement into the space surrounding a fractured vertebra. (Vertebroplasty injects the cement directly into the vertebra.) Kyphoplasty is used to stabilize the spine and return spinal cord height to as normal as possible. However, a review published in 2006 by a nonprofit health services research agency found that the technique does not improve a person's back pain or quality of life. Kyphoplasty should only be done if bed rest, medicines, and physical therapy do not relieve back pain. Those with severe fractures or spinal infections should not have kyphoplasty.

Artificial Disk Replacement. Total disk replacement is an investigative procedure for some patients with severely damaged disks. The technique implants artificial disks (ProDisc, Link, SB Charite) consisting of two metal plates and a soft core. The surgery can be performed using a minimally invasive laparoscopic procedure, which is performed through tiny cuts using miniature tools and viewing devices. A study in 2003 was the first to suggest that it may eventually achieve results that are comparable to standard surgeries for disk herniation. An artificial cushioning device called the prosthetic disk nucleus (PDN) replaces only the inner gel-like core (nucleus pulposus) within the intervertebral space, rather than the entire disk. It is showing promise in early studies.

Nerve Blocks. A number of surgical techniques are available for relieving pain by impairing nerves that are causing pain due to impingement. Medical research has shown that 60% of the patients who received electrical stimulation to block the nerves reported at least 90% relief of pain after a year; 87% reported at least 60% relief.

Other Treatments

Radiofrequency Nerve Destruction. Radiofrequencies are being used to destroy nerves involved in the facet joints (or z-joints), which connect the vertebrae. Evidence is still weak on its benefits. A 2003 analysis suggested that it may be beneficial, however, for relief of neck pain and possibly for low back pain caused by problems in the facets joints. Serious infections have been reported.

Stem cell treatments. Researchers in England have pioneered a new technique to grow new spinal tissue using the patient's own stem cells. Stem cells are the building blocks of specific cells. Every cell in the human body starts (or "stems") from a stem cell. The new tissue will replace damaged spinal tissue and may relieve low back pain. Researchers expect the treatment to enter pre-clinical trials in about 1 year.

Specific Treatment for Acute Low Back Pain

Patients with short-term acute low back pain usually have the best results with the least aggressive treatments. The general approach is as follows:

Patients with no serious underlying cause should stay as active as possible within the limits of the back pain. (Bed rest is not recommended.)
Physical therapy or spinal manipulations may be helpful if pain continues for more than 2 - 3 weeks.
The patient should seek a specialist if pain continues for more than 1 month. (Some patients may need to see a specialist sooner if there is an underlying disorder, nerve damage, or injury.) Back pain due to medical conditions such as arthritis, osteoporosis, or pregnancy either goes away when the underlying condition disappears or is treated.

Home Care Tips for Relieving Pain

Resume normal activity as soon as possible. Bed rest is no longer recommended and may delay recovery. Activities should be done without strain or stretching.
Avoid intense exercise and physical activity, particularly heavy lifting and trunk twisting if there is acute back pain.
Try an over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory such as aspirin or ibuprofen. These medicines often provide significant benefits.
Apply heat (104°) to the painful area. Heat may work better than ibuprofen or acetaminophen. One group of researchers found that people with low back pain who wear low-level heat wraps for 8 hours a day have significant less pain and disability.
Try alternating between hot and cold packs. Some doctors recommend changing from hot to cold every 3 minutes and repeating this sequence three times. Others believe ice packs should be applied first. This routine should be done two or three times during the day. (Note: Heat or cold treatments do not have much effect on sciatica.)
Supportive back belts, braces, or corsets may help some people temporarily, but these products can reduce muscle tone over time and should be used only briefly.
Get plenty of sleep. Healthy sleep plays a vital role in recovery. Avoid caffeine in the afternoon and evening, and unwind before bed by taking a warm bath or practicing relaxation techniques. It is often difficult to get a good night's sleep when suffering from back pain, particularly because the pain can intensify at night. Some people may need medicine to help manage nighttime pain or treat sleeplessness. Lying curled up in a fetal position with a pillow between the knees or lying on the back with a pillow under the knees may help.

Prescription muscle relaxants may help some patients, although their benefits are uncertain. Once started, medications should be taken on a regular schedule in order to maintain consistent effectiveness.

Massage therapy may help relieve both acute and chronic low back pain. Several well-conducted studies have shown some benefit and suggest it may reduce the costs of care. Massage therapy may not be covered by health insurance.

Spinal manipulation may help, although it is not clear if it works any better than physical therapy or general care. Some experts recommend delaying this treatment until pain has persisted for 3 weeks, if possible, since the back pain will most likely have gone away on its own by then.

Acupuncture has not proven to have any value for acute low back pain in most patients, but may provide some help for patients with chronic low back pain.

Be aware of and avoid approaches that are not helpful. Certain approaches may even be harmful for acute low back pain. For example, permanent bipolar magnets (magnet therapies) can deactivate heart devices and must be kept at least six inches away from pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators. These magnets have gained some popularity as a non-invasive method of relieving pain, but no studies support the claims.

Specific Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain

Evidence strongly suggests that only intensive treatment, involving both physical and psychological rehabilitation programs, can reduce pain and improve function in patients with chronic low back pain. Even with the best treatments, many patients with chronic back pain fail to have complete pain relief. They often must develop methods for coping with persistent pain.

Early treatments for severe or chronic low back pain are similar to those of acute uncomplicated low back pain.

Pain relievers, particularly non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), may help relieve symptoms, although they can have severe effects on the gastrointestinal tract over time. Some doctors have recommended long-term opioids for patients with severe chronic pain, but studies suggest they do not improve activity levels and can have significant side effects.

Corticosteroid injections and tricyclic antidepressants may be helpful for some patients.

Specific and regular exercise under the guidance of a trained professional is important for reducing pain and improving function, although patients often find it difficult to maintain therapy.

A new type of physical therapy, called Souchard's global postural re-education, helps relieve back pain symptoms due to degenerative disk disease, according to research presented at the 2005 American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting. The method involves stretching weakened muscles around the spine and stomach. Researchers studied 102 people who had at least 7 months of severe back pain due to disk disease and who had received different types of treatment for more than 6 months. They attended the new physical therapy sessions two times the first week, then once a week for an average of 5 months. Ninety-two percent had significant pain relief and returned to their normal daily activities. The majority of those who had pain relief felt better after 3 weeks, and remained pain free for almost 2 years.

Alternative therapies may help. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and massage may relieve pain. Mind-body techniques such as relaxation and meditation may be help reducing stress-related pain. Cognitive-behavioral therapy helps change behavior and attitudes toward pain.

Acupuncture may provide longer-lasting pain relief than physical therapy, according to a study in the British Medical Journal. For the study, 129 people were given either 6 acupuncture or physical therapy sessions. The study authors cautioned that the benefit of acupuncture greatly depended on the health care provider’s experience. Another study, published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, reported that acupuncture worked better than no treatment at all.

Yoga relieves low back pain better than conventional exercise or self-help books, according to a study published in the December 20, 2005, issue of Annals of Internal Medicine. For the study, 101 adults with low back pain who were randomly assigned to one of three groups. One group attended yoga classes and lessons; the second did aerobics, weight training, and stretching; and third group read a self-help book about back pain. After 12 weeks, those who took yoga could better perform daily activities requiring the back than those in the other two groups. After 26 weeks, those who took yoga had less pain and better back function, and used fewer pain relievers than the others.

Patients should always try all possible non-surgical treatments before opting for surgery. The most common reasons for surgery for low back pain are sciatica and spinal stenosis. Some experts believe that less than 1% of back pain patients need aggressive medical or surgical treatments.

Nevertheless, when it is appropriate, surgery can provide great relief. Many approaches and procedures are available or being investigated. However, there have been few well-conducted studies to determine if any type of back pain surgery works better than others, or if a single procedure is better than no surgery at all.

People who are obese and have low back pain may benefit from surgical weight loss surgery. A study in the journal Obesity Surgery found that bariatric (stomach stapling) surgery significantly improves the degree of disability in morbidly obese patients who have low back pain.

Before having any surgery, it is extremely important that the patient is sure that the surgeon has had significant experience with the procedure.

Nonsurgical Procedures. Patients with herniated disks should try nonsurgical treatments for at least 1 month before considering surgery. Nonsurgical procedures include spinal manipulation, massage therapy, and physical therapy. Patients should wait at least 2 - 3 weeks before using spinal manipulation.

Surgery. According to a 2001 review of studies, about 10% of patients have such bad back pain after 6 weeks that a diskectomy may be considered. Diskectomy is the standard procedure for herniated disks. For many of these patients, surgery may bring significant relief. In one study, 70% of patients with moderate-to-severe sciatica who had had surgery reported improvement. In most patients, the improvement was better than that achieved by 4 years of nonsurgical treatments. It is not clear if surgery maintains its advantage for longer periods of time.

Preventing Falls. Falling is a risk for patients with spinal stenosis. They should avoid alcohol and sedatives. Leg strengthening exercises such as walking and cycling may be helpful.

Nonsurgical Treatments. The use of common pain relievers such as NSAIDs, physical therapy, and spinal injections may be helpful for some patients.

Surgery. If pain is persistent, patients may require surgery, most often a procedure called decompressive laminectomy. Some patients may require spinal fusion as well. Studies suggest that surgery reduces back pain in many patients with spinal stenosis, at least for a few years. However, by 4 years after surgery, 30% of patients have severe pain again, and 10% have another operation. It should be noted that surgery does not always improve outcome and, in some cases, can even make it worse. Surgery can be an extremely effective approach, however, for certain patients whose severe back pain does not respond to conservative measures.

The general approach for patients with piriformis syndrome is corticosteroid injections and physical therapy. Botox injections are showing promise.

In carefully selected patients who do not respond to physical therapy and injections, some studies report dramatic pain relief with a surgical procedure that releases the piriformis muscle.

Prognosis

Most people with acute low back pain are back at work within a month and fully recover within a few months. According to one study, about a third of patients with uncomplicated low back pain significantly improved after a week; two-thirds recovered by 7 weeks.

However, studies now suggest that up to 75% of patients suffer at least one recurrence of back pain over the course of a year. In another study, after 4 years, less than half were symptom-free. Some doctors are approaching the problem as one that is not necessarily curable and which needs a consistent on-going approach.

Specific conditions can determine the rate of improvement:

In the majority of patients with herniated disks, the condition improves (although the actual physical improvement may be slower than the reduction in pain). Researchers attempted to identify factors most likely to predict an elevated risk for recurrent pain and found that only depression was a significant factor in the majority of those who had not recovered.
Spinal stenosis stabilizes in about 70% of cases and worsens in 15%.

Studies have found that when people stay home because of back injury, only 65% are back at work within a week. Nearly 14% are still absent at one month. If someone is on disability for more than 6 months, the chance of them returning to work is only 50%.

Low back pain accounts for significant losses in work days and dollars. In 1990, it cost the U.S. $23 billion in direct medical costs and possibly as much as $85 billion in total costs (such as lost productivity). Chronic back pain has become one of the most expensive causes of disability among workers under the age of 45. One study found that, although severe back pain comprised only 10% of workers compensation cases, it accounted for 86% of compensation costs.

Complications

Certain warning signs should alert a patient to see a doctor immediately for low back pain. Any very severe back pain warrants attention, particularly if any of the following conditions are present:

Being over 50
Recent injury
Severe pain
Pain awakens the person at night
Pain accompanied by fever (possible infection)
Pain increased by lying down
Pain unrelated to movement
Pain lasts for a month, and is accompanied by unexplained fever or weight loss
History or chronic use of corticosteroids
Intravenous drug use
History of urinary tract infection
In children, any severe neck or back pain or pain that persists for more than 3 days

Cauda equina syndrome is the impingement of the cauda equina (the four strands of nerves leading through the lowest part of the spine). It is an emergency condition that can cause severe complications of the bowel or bladder. Cauda equina syndrome is usually caused by massive extrusion of the disk material. It can cause permanent incontinence if not promptly treated with surgery. Symptoms of the cauda equina syndrome include:

Dull back pain
Weakness or numbness in the buttocks, in the area between the legs, or in the inner thigh, backs of legs, or feet. May cause difficulty in standing or stumbling.
An inability to control urination and defecation
Pain accompanied by fever (can indicate an infection)

Prevention

Exercise, diet, stress, and weight all have a significant influence on back pain. Changing certain lifestyle factors can help reduce and, possibly, prevent backaches.

Smokers are at higher risk for back problems, perhaps because smoking decreases blood circulation. The link may also be due to an unhealthy lifestyle in general. A British study found that young adults who were long-term smokers were nearly twice as likely to develop low back pain as nonsmokers.

Sedentary Lifestyle. People who do not exercise regularly face an increased risk for low back pain, especially when they perform sudden, stressful activities such as shoveling, digging, or moving heavy items. Although no definitive studies have been done to prove the relationship between lack of exercise and low back pain, some doctors believe that an inactive lifestyle may be to blame in some cases. Lack of exercise leads to the following conditions that may threaten the back:

Stiff muscles can make it hard to move, rotate, and bend the back.
Weak stomach muscles can increase the strain on the back and cause an abnormal tilt of the pelvis.
Weak back muscles may increase the risk for disk compression.
Obesity puts more weight on the spine and increase pressure on the vertebrae and disks. However, studies report only a weak association between obesity and low back pain.

Improper or Intense Exercise. Improper or excessive exercise may also increase one's chances for back pain.

Some research suggests that over time, high-impact exercise may increase the risk for degenerative disk disease. A survey of people who played tennis, however, found no increased risk for low back pain or sciatica.
Between 30 - 70% of cyclists experience low back pain. One 1999 study reported that 70% of cyclists reported improvement simply by adjusting the angle of the bicycle seat.
Improper exercise instruction and inattention to body movements can lead to back trouble. For example, a single jerky golf swing or incorrect use of exercise equipment (especially free weights, nautilus, and rowing machines) can cause serious back injuries.

The way a person moves, stands, or sleeps plays a major role in back pain.

Maintaining good posture is very important. This means keeping the ears, shoulders, and hips in a straight line with the head up and stomach pulled in. It is best not to stand for long periods of time. If it is necessary, walk as much as possible and wear shoes without heels, preferably with cushioned soles. Use a low foot stool and alternate resting each foot on top of it.
Sitting puts the most pressure on the back. Chairs should either have straight backs or low-back support. If possible, chairs should swivel to avoid twisting at the waist, have arm rests, and adjustable backs. While sitting, the knees should be a little higher than the hip, so a low stool or hassock is useful to put the feet on. A small pillow or rolled towel behind the lower back helps relieve pressure while either sitting or driving.
Riding in and driving a car for long periods of time increases stress. Move the car seat as far forward as possible to avoid bending forward. The back of the seat should not be reclined more than 30 degrees. If possible, the seat bottom should be tilted slightly upward in front. A traveler should stop and walk around about every hour. Avoid lifting or carrying objects immediately after the ride.

Anyone who engages in heavy lifting should take precautions when lifting and bending.

If an object is too heavy or awkward, get help.
Spread your feet apart to give a wide base of support.
Stand as close as possible to the object being lifted.
Bend at the knees, not at the waist. As you move up and down, tighten stomach muscles and tuck buttocks in so that the pelvis is rolled under and the spine remains in a natural "S' curve. (Even when not lifting an object, always try to use this posture when stooping down.)
Hold objects close to the body to reduce the load on the back.
Lift using the leg muscles, not those in the back.
Stand up without bending forward from the waist.
Never twist from the waist while bending or lifting any heavy object. If you need to move an object to one side, point your toes in that direction and pivot toward it.
If an object can be moved without lifting, pull it, don't push.

There are four natural curves in the spinal column: the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral curvature. The curves, along with the intervertebral disks, help to absorb and distribute stresses that occur from everyday activities such as walking or from more intense activities such as running and jumping.

Resources

www.niams.nih.gov -- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
www.aaos.org -- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
www.arthritis.org -- Arthritis Foundation
www.spine.org -- North American Spine Society
www.apta.org -- American Physical Therapy Association
www.ampainsoc.org -- American Pain Society
www.theacpa.org -- American Chronic Pain Association
www.iasp-pain.org -- International Association for the Study of Pain

References

Apkarian AV, Sosa Y, Sonty S, Levy RM, Harden RN, Parrish TB, et al. Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density. J Neurosci. 2004;24(46):10410-10415.

Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, Yu LM, Barker K, Collins R; Spine Stabilisation Trial Group. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ. 2005;330(7502):1233.

Filler AG, Haynes J, Jordan SE, Prager J, Villablanca JP, Farahani K, et al. Sciatica of nondisc origin and piriformis syndrome: diagnosis by magnetic resonance neurography and interventional magnetic resonance imaging with outcome study of resulting treatment. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2(2):99-115.

Freeman BJ, Fraser RD, Cain CM, Hall DJ, Chapple DC. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine. 2005 Nov 1;30(21):2369-77; discussion 2378.

Friedrich M, Gittler G, Arendasy M, Friedrich KM. Long-term effect of a combined exercise and motivational program on the level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2005;30(9):995-1000.

Frost H, Stewart-Brown S. Acupressure for low back pain. BMJ. 2006 Mar 25;332(7543):680-1.

Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara AV, Koes BW. Meta-analysis: exercise therapy for nonspecific low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(9):765-775.

Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(9):776-785.

Mercado AC, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Cote P. Passive coping is a risk factor for disabling neck or low back pain. Pain. 2005;117(1-2):51-57.

Melissas J, Kontakis G, Volakakis E, Tsepetis T, Alegakis A, Hadjipavlou A. The effect of surgical weight reduction on functional status in morbidly obese patients with low back pain. Obes Surg. 2005 Mar;15(3):378-81.

Pneumaticos SG, Chatziioannou SN, Hipp JA, Moore WH, Esses SI. Low back pain: prediction of short-term outcome of facet joint injection with bone scintigraphy. Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):693-8.

Ratcliffe J, Thomas KJ, MacPherson H, Brazier J. A randomised controlled trial of acupuncture care for persistent low back pain: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2006 Sep 23;333(7569):626.

Richardson SM, Curran JM, Chen R, et al. The differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into chondrocyte-like cells on poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2006 Aug;27(22):4069-78.

Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Erro J, Miglioretti DL, Deyo RA. Comparing Yoga, Exercise, and a Self-Care Book for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 143: 849 - 856.

Tao XG, Bernacki EJ. A randomized clinical trial of continuous low-level heat therapy for acute muscular low back pain in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Dec;47(12):1298-306.

Trout AT, Kallmes DF, Gray LA, Goodnature BA, Everson SL, Comstock BA, Jarvik JG. Evaluation of vertebroplasty with a validated outcome measure: the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(10):2652-7.

Review Date:
3/19/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M., Inc. is accredited by URAC, also known as the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission (www.urac.org). URAC's accreditation program is an independent audit to verify that A.D.A.M. follows rigorous standards of quality and accountability. A.D.A.M. is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial policy, editorial process and privacy policy. A.D.A.M. is also a founding member of Hi-Ethics and subscribes to the principles of the Health on the Net Foundation (www.hon.ch).

A.D.A.M. Copyright

The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical professional should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. © 1997-2009 A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.

adam.com

Scoliosis

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:13 -0700

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Diagnosing Scoliosis

Scoliosis is diagnosed typically in children 10 - 15 years of age. However, only about 1% of cases actually require treatment. There is a large female preponderance for larger curves that do require treatment.

Defining Scoliosis

Nonstructural scoliosis is a simple side-to-side curve of the spine. Structural scoliosis adds to that simple curve a rotation of the vertebrae, resulting in a twisting of the spine.

Causes

In about 80% of scoliosis cases, the cause is unknown (idiopathic scoliosis). Research has not been able to identify any genetic abnormality that would make a person susceptible to developing scoliosis.

Treatment with Bracing

Bracing has long been the standard treatment to prevent progression of the curvature of scoliosis. However, patient compliance has been a problem, especially for younger patients. Newer braces are now more comfortable and can be worn discretely under the clothing, thus improving patient compliance and treatment results.

Introduction

Scoliosis is the abnormal curvature of the spine. While the normal spine has gentle natural curves that round the shoulders and make the lower back curve inward, scoliosis typically involves a three-dimensional deformity of the spinal column and rib cage. To varying degrees, the spine curves from side-to-side, and some of the spinal bones may rotate slightly, making the hips or shoulders appear uneven. It may develop in the following way:

As a single primary side-to-side curve (resembling the letter C), or
As two curves (a primary curve along with a compensating secondary curve that forms an S shape).

Scoliosis most commonly develops in the area between the upper back (the thoracic area) and lower back (lumbar area). It may also occur only in the upper or lower back. The doctor attempts to define scoliosis by the following characteristics:

The shape of the curve
Its location
Its direction
Its magnitude
Its causes, if possible

Click the icon to see an image of scoliosis.

The severity of scoliosis is determined by the extent of the spinal curvature and the angle of the trunk rotation (ATR) and is usually measured in degrees. Curves of less than 20 degrees are considered mild and account for 80% of scoliosis cases. Curves that progress beyond 20% require medical attention. Such attention, however, usually involves periodic monitoring to make sure the condition is not becoming worse.

Scoliosis affects about 2 - 3% of the population (about 6 million people in the United States). It can occur in adults but is more commonly diagnosed for the first time in children aged 10 - 15 years. About 10% of the adolescent population has some degree of scoliosis, but less than 1% develops scoliosis that requires treatment. The condition also tends to run in families. Among persons with relatives that have scoliosis, about 20% develop the condition.

Among adults, previous reports have indicated a prevalence of scoliosis of up to 32%. But a recent study of 75 healthy adults aged 60 years and older with no known history of scoliosis or prior spine surgery suggested a rate of 68%. However, scoliosis was not linked to physical or social impairment in this population.

Scoliosis is often categorized by the shape of the curve, usually as either structural or nonstructural.

Structural scoliosis. In addition to the spine curving from side to side, the vertebrae rotate, twisting the spine. As it twists, one side of the rib cage is pushed outward so that the spaces between the ribs widen and the shoulder blade protrudes (producing the rib-cage deformity, or hump). The other half of the rib cage is twisted inward, compressing the ribs.
Nonstructural scoliosis. The curve does not twist but is a simple side-to-side curve.

Other abnormalities of the spine that may occur alone or in combination with scoliosis include hyperkyphosis (an abnormal exaggeration in the backward rounding of the upper spine) and hyperlordosis (an exaggerated forward curving of the lower spine, also called swayback).

Click the icon to see an image of kyphosis.

The location of a structural curve is defined by the location of the apical vertebra. This is bone at the highest point (the apex) in the spinal hump. This particular vertebra also undergoes the most severe rotation during the disease process.

The direction of the curve in structural scoliosis is determined by whether the convex (rounded) side of the curve bends to the right or left. For example, a doctor will diagnose a patient as having right thoracic scoliosis if the apical vertebra is in the thoracic (upper back) region of the spine, and the curve bends to the right.

The magnitude of the curve is determined by taking measurements of the length and angle of the curve on an x-ray view.

Vertebrae. The spine is a column of small bones, or vertebrae, that support the entire upper body. The column is grouped into three sections of vertebrae:

Cervical (C) vertebrae are the 7 spinal bones that support the neck.
Thoracic (T) vertebrae are the 12 spinal bones that connect to the rib cage.
Lumbar (L) vertebrae are the 5 lowest and largest bones of the spinal column. Most of the body's weight and stress falls on the lumbar vertebrae.

Each vertebra can be designated by using a letter and number; the letter reflects the region (C=cervical, T=thoracic, and L=lumbar), and the number signifies its location within that region. For example, C4 is the fourth bone down in the cervical region, and T8 is the eighth thoracic vertebra.

Below the lumbar region is the sacrum, a shield-shaped bony structure that connects with the pelvis at the sacroiliac joints. At the end of the sacrum are 2 - 4 tiny, partially fused vertebrae known as the coccyx or "tail bone."

The Spinal Column and its Curves. Altogether, the vertebrae form the spinal column. In the upper trunk the column normally has a gentle outward curve (kyphosis) while the lower back has a reverse inward curve (lordosis).

The Disks. Vertebrae in the spinal column are separated from each other by small cushions of cartilage known as intervertebral disks. Inside each disk is a jelly-like substance called the nucleus pulposus, which is surrounded by a tough, fibrous ring called the annulus fibrosis. The disk is 80% water. This structure makes the disk both elastic and strong. The disks have no blood supply of their own, relying instead on nearby blood vessels to keep them nourished.

Processes. Each vertebra in the spine has a number of bony projections, known as processes. The spinal and transverse processes attach to the muscles in the back and act like little levers, allowing the spine to twist or bend. The particular processes form the joints between the vertebrae themselves, meeting together and interlocking at the zygapophysial joints (more commonly known as facet or z joints).

Click the icon to see an image of the spine.

Click the icon to see an image of the sacrum.

Click the icon to see an image of the curves of the spine.

Click the icon to see an image of an intervertebral disk.

Click the icon to see an image of the spinal canal.

Causes

In 80% of patients, the cause of scoliosis is unknown. Such cases are called idiopathic scoliosis. (Idiopathic means without a known cause.) Idiopathic scoliosis may be due to multiple, poorly understood inherited factors, most likely from the mother's side. However, the severity often varies widely among family members who have the condition, suggesting that other factors must be present.

Researchers have not been able to identify the specific genetic abnormalities that make a young person susceptible to spinal distortion. Inherited physical abnormalities, problems in coordination, abnormalities in the central nervous system, and other inherited factors may play some role either alone or in combination with other conditions to produce scoliosis.

Physical Abnormalities. Researchers are investigating possible physical abnormalities that may cause imbalances in bones or muscles that would lead to scoliosis. Among them are the following:

Imbalances in Muscles around the Vertebrae. Some research suggests that imbalances in the muscles around the vertebrae may make children susceptible to spinal distortions as they grow.
High Arches. One study showed a higher incidence of abnormally high arches in the feet in people with idiopathic scoliosis, suggesting that altered balance may be a factor in certain cases.

Problems in Coordination. Some experts are looking at inherited defects in perception or coordination that may cause asymmetrical growth in the spine of some children with scoliosis.

Genetic Abnormalities in the Central Nervous System. Genetic defects that cause altered processing in the brain may play a role in producing abnormalities in the growing spine. For example, research has implicated low levels of melatonin, a hormone secreted in the pineal gland in brain. Melatonin is involved with sleep and growth. Researchers speculate that genetic factors that cause reduced blood levels of melatonin may adversely affect muscle tone and development during sleep, perhaps contributing to scoliosis.

Other Biologic Factors. Several other biologic factors are being investigated for some contribution to scoliosis:

Abnormalities in collagen, the critical structural protein found in muscles and bones. Enzymes known as matrix metalloproteinases are involved in the repair and remodeling of collagen. Researchers have found high levels of the enzymes in the disks of patients with scoliosis, which suggests that the enzymes may contribute to curve progression. Elevated levels of the enzymes can cause abnormalities in components in the spinal disks, contributing to disk degeneration.
A possible defective gene responsible for production of fibrillin, an important component of connective tissue, which makes up bones and muscles.
Abnormalities in a protein called platelet calmodulin that binds to calcium. This protein acts like a tiny muscle and pulls clots together. Measuring levels of this protein may eventually help predict whether scoliosis will worsen.

Congenital scoliosis is caused by inborn spinal deformities that may result in the development of absent or fused vertebrae. Kidney problems, particularly having only one kidney, often coincide with congenital scoliosis. The condition usually becomes evident at either age 2 or between ages 8 and 13 as the spine begins to grow more quickly, putting additional stress on the abnormal vertebrae. It is essential to diagnose and monitor such curvatures as early as possible, since they can progress quickly. Early surgical treatment -- before age 5 -- may be important in many of these patients to prevent serious complications.

Adult scoliosis has two primary causes:

Progression of childhood scoliosis.
Degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis is a condition that typically develops after age 50. With this condition, the lower spine is affected, usually due to disk degeneration. Osteoporosis, a serious problem in many older adults, is not a risk factor for new-onset scoliosis, but it can be a contributing factor. In most cases, however, it is not known why scoliosis occurs in adults.

Scoliosis may be a result of various conditions that affect bones and muscles associated with the spinal column. They include the following:

Muscle paralysis.
Muscle deterioration from diseases such as muscular dystrophy, polio, or cerebral palsy.
Injury to the spinal cord.
Tumors, growths, or other small abnormalities on the spinal column. For example, syringomyelia, a disorder in which cysts form along the spine, can cause scoliosis. These spinal abnormalities may play a larger role in causing some cases of scoliosis than previously thought.
Familial dysautonomia, a rare disorder in Jewish children of Ashkenazi descent. (Only about 500 cases have been reported.)
Stress fractures and hormonal abnormalities that affect bone growth in young, competitive athletes.
Birth defects, including spina bifida (an open spinal cord) and myelomeningocele (a hernia of the central nervous system).
Turner syndrome, a genetic disease in females that affects physical and reproductive development.
Other diseases that can cause scoliosis are Marfan syndrome, Aicardi syndrome, Friedreich ataxia, Albers-Schonberg disease, rheumatoid arthritis, Cushing syndrome, and osteogenesis imperfecta.

Spina bifida is a congenital disorder (birth defect) in which the backbone and spinal canal do not close before birth. In severe cases, this can result in the spinal cord and its covering membranes protruding out of an affected infant's back. Spina bifida may also be nearly inconsequential, or may be repairable through surgery.

Nonstructural scoliosis is usually not a serious problem, since the curve is side to side. It can develop from a number of physical problems, including the following:

Unequal leg length. Injury, a shortened Achilles tendon, or other structural in-born problems can cause this very common condition. Unequal leg length rarely causes any problems and in most cases requires no treatment other than a lift in one of the shoes to equalize the length.
Muscle spasms.

Risk Factors

Risk Factors for Initial Scoliosis. Idiopathic scoliosis, the most common form, occurs most often during the growth spurt right before and during adolescence. (Between 12 - 21% of idiopathic cases occur in children ages 3 - 10 years, and less than 1% in infants.) Mild curvature (under 20 degrees) occurs about equally in girls and boys, but curve progression is 10 times more likely to occur in girls. Being taller than average at earlier ages may put some girls at risk, but other factors must be present to produce scoliosis. A risk factor that affects females is a delayed onset of menstruation, which can prolong the growth spurt period, thus increasing the possibility for the development of scoliosis.

Risk Factors for Curvature Progression. Once scoliosis is diagnosed, it is very difficult to predict who is at highest risk for curve progression. About 2 - 4% of all adolescents develop curvature of 10 degrees or more, but only about 0.3 - 0.5% of teenagers have curves greater than 20 degrees, which requires some medical attention.

People with certain medical conditions that affect the joints and muscles are at higher risk for scoliosis. These conditions include rheumatoid arthritis, muscular dystrophy, polio, and cerebral palsy. Children who receive organ transplants (kidney, liver, heart) are also at increased risk.

In one study, idiopathic scoliosis occurred in about 5% of close family members of children with the condition.

Scoliosis may be evident in young athletes, with a prevalence of 2 - 24%. The highest rates are observed among dancers, gymnasts, and swimmers. The scoliosis may have been due in part to loosening of the joints, delay in puberty onset (which can lead to weakened bones), and stresses on the growing spine. There have also been other isolated reports of a higher risk for scoliosis in young athletes who engage vigorously in sports that put an uneven load on the spine. These include figure skating, dance, tennis, skiing, and javelin throwing, among other sports. In most cases, the scoliosis is minor, and everyday sports do not lead to scoliosis. Exercise has many benefits for people both young and old and may even help patients with scoliosis.

Prognosis

In general, the severity of the scoliosis depends on the degree of the curvature and whether it threatens vital organs, specifically the lungs and heart.

Mild Scoliosis (less than 20 degrees). Mild scoliosis is not serious and requires no treatment other than monitoring.
Moderate Scoliosis (between 25 and 70 degrees). It is still not clear whether untreated moderate scoliosis causes significant health problems later on. Some studies have found no difference in either back pain or survival rates in adult untreated patients versus the general population. In one study, adults with moderate scoliosis had normal lung function, although they had difficulty exercising. (This low exercise tolerance might have been because many patients with scoliosis do not engage in regular physical activity.)
Severe Scoliosis (over 70 degrees). If the curvature exceeds 70 degrees, the severe twisting of the spine that occurs in structural scoliosis can cause the ribs to press against the lungs, restrict breathing, and reduce oxygen levels. The distortions may also affect the heart and possibly cause dangerous changes.
Very Severe Scoliosis (Over 100 degrees). Eventually, if the curve reaches over 100 degrees, both the lungs and heart can be injured. Patients with this degree of severity are susceptible to lung infections and pneumonia. Curves greater than 100 degrees increase mortality rates, but this problem is very uncommon in America.

Some experts argue that simply measuring the degree of the curve may not identify patients in the moderate and severe groups who are at greatest risk for lung problems. Other factors (spinal flexibility, the extent of asymmetry between the ribs and the vertebrae) may be more important in predicting severity in this group.

Scoliosis is associated with osteopenia, a condition characterized by loss of bone mass. About 27 - 38% of adolescent girls who have scoliosis also have osteopenia. Some experts recommend measuring bone mineral density when a patient is diagnosed with scoliosis. The amount of bone loss may help predict how severely the spine will curve. Preventing and treating osteopenia may help limit further curve progression.

If not treated, osteopenia can later develop into osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is a more serious loss of bone density that is common among postmenopausal women. Adolescents who have scoliosis are at increased risk of developing osteoporosis later in life. [See In-Depth Report#18: Osteoporosis.]

Osteoporosis is a condition characterized by progressive loss of bone density, thinning of bone tissue, and increased vulnerability to fractures. Osteoporosis may result from disease, dietary or hormonal deficiency, or advanced age. Regular exercise and vitamin and mineral supplements can reduce and even reverse loss of bone density.

After 20 years or more, scoliosis patients who were previously treated with surgery experience small but significant physical impairment, (mainly mild back problems), compared to their peers without scoliosis. In one study, 65% of patients reported some low back pain compared to 47% of people without a history of scoliosis. In general it was mild, although 45% of patients reported having to take days off from work compared to 19% of nonscolosis patients. In another study, only 1.5% of the scoliosis group had severe debilitating back pain. In general, the quality of life was similar, however. Pain also did not play a major role in social limitations.

The following are some possible causes of later back problems in people with a history of treated scoliosis:

Spinal fusion disease. Patients who are surgically treated with fusion techniques lose flexibility and may experience weakness in back muscles due to injuries during surgery.
Disk degeneration and low back pain. With disk degeneration, the disks between the vertebrae may become weakened and rupture. In some patients, years after the original surgeries, particularly with the first generation of the Harrington rods, the weight of the instrumentation can cause disk and joint degeneration severe enough to require surgery. Treatment may involve removal of the old instrumentation and extension of the fusion into the lower back. Still, most patients do not experience significant back pain from these problems.
Height loss.
Scarred regions. Pain can occur from old scars in the incision areas.
Lumbar flatback. This condition is most often the result of a scoliosis surgical procedure called the Harrington technique, which eliminated lordosis (the inward curve in the lower back). Adult patients with flatback syndrome tend to stoop forward. They may experience fatigue and back and even neck pain.
Rotational trunk shift (uneven shoulders and hips).

Evidence suggests that previous treatment with braces may also cause mild back pain and more days off, but problems appear to be less than with surgery. In one study, dysfunction was comparable to people without a history of scoliosis.

Pain in adult-onset or untreated childhood scoliosis often develops because of posture problems that cause uneven stresses on the back, hips, shoulders, necks, and legs. In one study conducted 20 years after growth had stopped, two-thirds of adults who had lived with curvatures of 20 - 55 degrees reported they experienced back pain. Other studies have reported that adults with a history of scoliosis tend to have chronic and more back pain than the general population.

Nearly all individuals with untreated scoliosis at some point develop spondylosis, an arthritic condition in the spine. The joints become inflamed, the cartilage that cushions the disks may thin, and bone spurs may develop. If the disk degenerates or the curvature progresses to the point that the spinal vertebrae begin pressing on the nerves, pain can be very severe and may require surgery. Even surgically treated patients are at risk for spondylosis if inflammation occurs in vertebrae around the fusion site.

Emotional Impact in Childhood. The emotional impact of scoliosis, particularly on young girls or boys during their most vulnerable years, should not be underestimated. Adults who have had scoliosis and its treatments often recall significant social isolation and physical pain. Follow-up studies of children who had scoliosis without having strong family and professional support often report significant behavioral problems. Fortunately, current treatments are solving many of the problems that previous generations had to deal with, including unsightly bracing and extremely painful surgeries with little pain control.

Emotional Effects in Adults. Of some concern are growing numbers of adults with scoliosis. This group experiences considerable problems in general health, social functioning, emotional and mental health, as well as pain.

Older people with a history of treated scoliosis may carry negative emotional events into adulthood that have their roots in their early experiences with scoliosis. Many studies have reported that patients who were treated for scoliosis have limited social activities and a poorer body image in adulthood. Some patients with a history of scoliosis have reported a slight negative effect on their sexual life. Pain appears to be only a minor reason for such limitation.

Women who have been successfully treated for scoliosis have only minor or no additional risks at all for complications during pregnancy and delivery. A history of scoliosis also does not endanger the child. Pregnancy itself, even multiple pregnancies, does not increase the risk for curve progression. Women who have severe scoliosis that restricts the lungs, however, should be monitored closely.

Some evidence suggests a slightly higher risk for breast cancer and leukemia in patients who had multiple x-rays. Risks are highest in patients who had the largest radiation exposure, such as those who had been surgically treated.

Patients who simply received x-ray series for untreated idiopathic scoliosis or scoliosis caused by uneven length legs or hip abnormalities have a very low risk for future complications.

Click the icon to see an image of an x-ray.

Symptoms

Scoliosis is usually painless. The curvature itself may often be too subtle to be noticed, even by observant parents. Some parents may notice abnormal posture in their growing child that includes:

A tilted head that does not line up over the hips
A protruding shoulder blade
One hip or shoulder that is higher than the other, causing an uneven hem or shirt line
An uneven neckline
Leaning more to one side than the other
In developing girls, breasts appearing to be of unequal size
One side of the upper back being higher than the other when the child bends over, knees together, with the arms dangling down

Scoliosis may be suspected when one shoulder appears to be higher than the other, there is a curvature in the spine, or the pelvis appears to be tilted. The treatment of scoliosis can involve the use of a brace or surgery. Treatment is determined by the cause of the scoliosis, the size and location of the curve, and the stage of bone growth of the patient.

With more advanced scoliosis, fatigue may occur after prolonged sitting or standing. Scoliosis caused by muscle spasms or growths on the spine can sometimes cause pain. Nearly always, however, mild scoliosis produces no symptoms, and the condition is usually detected by the pediatrician or during a school screening test.

Diagnosis

The severity of scoliosis and need for treatment is usually determined by two factors:

The extent of the spinal curvature. (Scoliosis is diagnosed when the curve measures 11 degrees or more.)
The angle of the trunk rotation (ATR).

Both are measured in degrees. These two factors are usually related. For example, a person with a spinal curve of 20 degrees will usually have a trunk rotation (ATR) of 5 degrees. These two measurements, in fact, used to be the cutoff for recommending treatment. However, the great majority of 20-degree curves do not get worse. Patients do not usually need medical attention until the curve reaches 30 degrees, and the ATR is 7 degrees.

Adam's Forward Bend Test. The screening test used most often in schools and in the offices of pediatricians and primary care doctors is called the Adam's forward bend test.

The child bends forward dangling the arms, with the feet together and knees straight. The curve of structural scoliosis is more apparent when bending over. In a child with scoliosis, the examiner may observe an imbalanced rib cage, with one side being higher than the other, or other deformities.

The forward bend test is used most often in schools and doctor's offices to screen for scoliosis. During the test, the child bends forward with the feet together and knees straight while dangling the arms. Any imbalances in the rib cage or other deformities along the back could be a sign of scoliosis.

The forward bend test, however, is not sensitive to abnormalities in the lower back, a very common site for scoliosis. Because the test misses about 15% of scoliosis cases, many experts do not recommend it as the sole method for screening for scoliosis.

Other Physical Tests.

The patient walks on the toes, then the heels, and then jumps up and down on one foot. Such activities indicate leg strength and balance.
The doctor will check leg length and look for tight tendons in the back of the leg, which may cause an uneven leg length or other back problems.
The doctor will also check for neurologic impairment by testing reflexes, nerve sensation, and muscle function.

Proper diagnosis is important. A misjudgment can lead to unnecessary x-rays and stressful treatments in children not actually at risk for progression. Unfortunately, although measurements of curves and rotation are useful, no test exists yet to determine whether a curve will progress.

Inclinometer (Scoliometer). An inclinometer, also known as a Scoliometer, measures distortions of the torso. The procedure is as follows:

The patient bends over, arms dangling and palms pressed together, until a curve can be observed in the upper back (thoracic area).
The Scoliometer is placed on the back and measures the apex (the highest point) of the upper back curve.
The patient continues bending until the curve can be seen in the lower back (lumbar area). The apex of this curve is also measured.
Measurements are repeated twice, with the patient returning to a standing position between repetitions.
If results show a deformity, x-rays probably need to be performed to determine the extent.

Some experts believe the Scoliometer would make a useful device for widespread screening. Scoliometers, however, indicate rib cage distortions in more than half of children who turn out to have very minor or no sideways curves. They are therefore not accurate enough to guide treatment.

Currently, x-rays are the most cost-effective method for diagnosing scoliosis. Experts hope that accurate, noninvasive diagnostic techniques will eventually be developed to replace some of the x-rays used to monitor the progression of scoliosis. To date, imaging techniques under investigation appear to be fairly accurate for detecting scoliosis in the upper back (the thoracic region), but not scoliosis in the lower back (the lumbar region).

X-Rays. If screening indicates scoliosis, the child may be sent to a specialist who takes an initial x-ray and monitors the child every few months using repeated x-rays. X-rays are essential for an accurate diagnosis of scoliosis in that they:

Reveal the degree and severity of scoliosis.
Identify any other spinal abnormalities, including kyphosis (hunchback) and hyperlordosis (swayback).
Help the doctor determine whether skeletal growth has reached maturity.
X-rays taken when patients are bending forward can also help differentiate between structural and nonstructural scoliosis. Structural curves persist when a person bends over, and nonstructural curves tend to disappear. (Muscle spasms or spinal growths may sometimes cause nonstructural scoliosis that shows a curve on bending.)
Children and young adolescents who have mild curves and in older adolescents who have more severe curvatures but whose growth has stopped or slowed need x-rays every few months to detect increasing severity. Young people who are diagnosed with scoliosis should keep their x-rays indefinitely in case they develop back problems later in adulthood and need to be re-examined.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an advanced imaging procedure that does not use radiation, as x-rays do. It is expensive, however, and not generally used for an initial diagnosis. MRI can, nevertheless, identify spinal cord and brain stem abnormalities, which some studies indicate may be more prevalent than previously believed in children with idiopathic scoliosis. It also may be particularly useful before surgery for detecting defects that could lead to potential complications.

Click the icon to see an image of a MRI scan.

Because frequent x-rays may be required for young children with scoliosis, parents should be sure that x-ray technicians take all necessary protective measures. Experts are concerned about the long-term effects of radiation on sensitive young organs, particularly about a possible increase in the risk for cancer. Studies have reported an increased risk for cancer in women and men who, because of scoliosis, had been exposed to diagnostic x-rays in their childhood and adolescence.

X-ray techniques have become safer in recent years, and technicians can reduce the hazards with the following simple measures:

Directing x-ray beams through the patient from back to front, rather than the reverse.
Using x-ray filters that absorb some of the beam.
Using fast film to reduce exposure by two to six times.
Placing lead aprons or shields over parts of the body that are not being x-rayed.

There are various methods for determining and classifying the extent of the curve.

Cobb Method. The technique known as the Cobb method nearly always calculates the degree of the curve.

On an x-ray of the spine, the examiner draws two lines: One line extends out and up from the edge of the top vertebrae of the curve. The second line extends out and down from the bottom vertebrae.
The technician then draws a perpendicular line between the two lines.
Measuring the intersecting angle determines the degree of curvature.

The Cobb method is limited because it cannot fully determine the flexibility or the three-dimensional aspect of the spine. It is not as effective, then, in defining spinal rotation or kyphosis. It also tends to over-estimate the curve. Other diagnostic tools are needed then to make a more accurate diagnosis.

Classifying the Curve.Classification of the curve allows the doctor to identify patterns that can help determine treatments, particularly specific surgical techniques. The following are examples:

King Classification. The King classification classifies scoliotic curves as one of five patterns, which can help determine surgical treatments. It has limitations, however, and is not very useful for advanced surgical techniques.
Lenke Classification. Lenke classification takes more features of the curve into consideration and is proving to be more reliable. This includes six curve patterns plus additional factors that modify each of these curves.

Three-Dimensional Modeling Techniques. Advanced computer modeling techniques are able to create three dimensional images using x-rays or other two-dimensional images. They allow doctors to observe the spinal distortions and eventually could reduce the number of x-rays currently needed to monitor scoliosis and help surgeons determine optimal surgical procedures.

Even if the curve is accurately calculated, it still remains difficult to predict whether the scoliosis will progress. A recent report indicates that measuring the nerve conduction activity of the muscles supporting the spine may help predict subsequent progression in children with scoliosis. In addition, computer models are being used to better predict risk. One approach requires measuring 21 radiographic and clinical indicators and entering them into a computer program. The technique takes less than 20 minutes per patient, and studies found it to be up to 80% accurate in determining progression of curvature.

One way of predicting whether or not the curvature will progress is knowing when the child will stop growing:

If the child has years to grow, then the spine has more time to progress.
If the child will stop growing within a year, then progression should be very slight. (However, some progression continues in nearly 70% of curves even after the spine has matured.)

Knowing the child's age is, of course, the first step in estimating the end of growth. In addition, other methods can help predict the end of the growth stage. One method is called the Risser sign, which grades the amount of bone in the area at the top of the hipbone. A low grade indicates that the skeleton still has considerable growth; a high grade means that the child has nearly stopped growing and the curve is unlikely to progress much further. The Risser scale differs between genders, and, in boys, a high grade does not always signify the end of progression.

Screening programs for scoliosis, which began in the 1940s, are now mandatory in middle or high schools in many states, but there is considerable debate over whether screening should be routine.

Arguments Against Routine Screening. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force does not recommend routine screening to detect adolescent scoliosis for the following reasons:

Screening tests are not accurate and depend too much on the skill of the examiner.
Schools often refer children with minor curves who are not at any risk for a progressive or serious condition to doctors, and such over-referrals add considerably to the costs of the health system. In one major study, 94% of the children referred to a doctor by the school did not require treatment. (Over 2,000 children were screened in order to find only 5 children who did need treatment.)
A long-term study of untreated patients with late-onset scoliosis indicates that these patients are productive and functional at a high level at 50-year follow-up. Patients with scoliosis have no greater danger for significant lung problems than the general population until their curves reach 60 - 100 degrees, making early screening unnecessary.

Experts against screening argue that such programs result in early treatments that either will not prevent curve progression and surgery or are unnecessary in the first place since curvatures often do not progress at all.

Arguments for Routine Screening. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons recommends that girls be screened twice, at ages 10 and 12, and that boys be screened once, at 13 or 14. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends, however, scoliosis screening at ages 10, 12, 14, and 16 years. (In one study, over 40% of high school sophomores with newly diagnosed scoliosis had shown no signs of the disorder in earlier screening tests.) Other experts make the following arguments for universal screening:

Universal screening is useful for producing information on scoliosis that may eventually lead to knowledge of its cause and ways to prevent it.
Braces have proven to be effective, and early treatment can be important.
Without screening, the chances are slim that children with scoliosis will be diagnosed at an early stage if parents rely only on examinations by a family doctor or pediatrician. Such doctors often do not even look at backs and, if they do, they tend to use only the forward bend test, which is not accurate.

Some experts argue that widespread screening would be cost effective if schools had reasonable guidelines for determining which children should see a doctor for further testing. The following are some suggested guidelines for determining the need for a doctor referral:

Children should be sent to a doctor only if they have a 30-degree curve. (A 20-degree curve with a 5-degree trunk rotation has been the criteria for recommending treatment, although up to 80% of 20-degree curves do not get worse.)
Children with curves between 20 and 30 degrees should be screened every 6 months.

Such guidelines would detect about 95% of all genuinely serious cases while referring only 3% of all children tested for follow-up, thereby cutting costs without jeopardizing children.

Treatment

The treatments for scoliosis are not always straightforward. Some young people do not need treatment at all -- only careful observation. When treatment is warranted, several options, including braces and different surgical procedures, can help.

The general rule of thumb for treating scoliosis is to monitor the condition if the curve is less than 20 degrees. Curves greater than 25 degrees, or those that progress by 10 degrees while being monitored, may require treatment. Whether scoliosis is treated immediately or simply monitored is not an easy decision, however. The percentage of cases that will progress more than 5 degrees can be as low as 5% in certain cases or as high as 50 - 90%, depending on the severity of the curve or other predisposing factors:

Age. In general, the older the child the less likely the curve will progress. Scoliosis in a child under 10, for example, is more likely to progress than scoliosis in an adolescent. Experts estimate that curves less than 19 degrees will progress 10% in girls ages 13 - 15 years and 4% in children older than 15. (In some rare, severe cases, a curve may worsen even after a child has received treatment and stopped growing because of the weight of the body pressing against the abnormal curve.)

Gender. Girls have a higher risk for progression than boys.

Location of the Curvature. Thoracic curves, those in the upper spine, are more likely to progress than thoracolumbar curves or lumbar curves, those of the middle to lower spine.

Severity of the Curvature. The higher the degree of curvature the more likely the chance of progression and the more likely the lungs will be affected. Some experts argue that the degree of the curve alone may not identify patients with moderate and severe scoliosis who are at greatest risk for complications and therefore need treatment. For example, spinal flexibility and the extent of asymmetry between the ribs and the vertebrae may be more important than the curve degree in predicting severity in this group.

Presence of Other Health Conditions. Children in poor health may suffer more from stressful scoliosis treatments than other children. On the other hand, children who have existing conditions and are predispose to lung and heart problems may warrant immediate, aggressive treatment.

For example, a young man of 18 who has a curvature of 30 degrees may require no treatment because his growth has probably almost stopped, and his gender puts him at lower risk. A young girl of 10, however, with the same curvature requires immediate treatment.

In general, the following criteria are used to determine whether a patient should receive braces and conservative therapies or surgery:

Braces tend to be used in children with curvatures between 25 - 40 degrees who still will be growing significantly.
Surgery is suggested for patients with curvatures over 50 degrees, in untreated patients, or when braces have failed. In adults, scoliosis rarely progresses beyond 40 degrees, but surgery may be required if the patient is in a great deal of pain or if the scoliosis causes neurologic problems.

The choice may not be so straightforward in certain cases, and patients should discuss all options with their doctor.

In Children and Adolescents. After a mild curve is detected, a more difficult step is required: predicting whether the curve will progress into a more serious condition. Although as many as 3 in every 100 teenagers have a condition serious enough to need at least observation, progression is highly variable and individual.

In a study of patients whose curves did progress after diagnosis, 34% progressed more than 10 degrees, 18% progressed more than 20 degrees, and 8% progressed more than 30 degrees. Doctors cannot rely on any definitive risk factors for curve progression to predict with any certainty which patients will need aggressive treatment. Some evidence suggests the following factors may help determine patients at lower or higher risk:

Being female, particularly if taller than average.
Being younger at the onset of scoliosis.
Having a greater angle of curvature. For example, at 20 degrees, only about 20% of curves progress. Young people diagnosed with a 30-degree curve, however, have a risk for progression of 60%. With a curve of 50 degrees, the risk is 90%.
Curvatures caused by congenital scoliosis (spinal problems present at birth). These may progress rapidly.
Treatment with growth hormone. (Studies are mixed on whether this treatment poses any significant risk, although strict monitoring is still essential in young patients being given growth hormone.)

Curvatures may be less likely to progress in girls whose scoliosis was low in the back and whose spine was out of balance by more than an inch. Height also comes into play. For example, a shorter-than-average girl of 14 with low-back scoliosis of 25 - 35 degrees but whose spine is imbalanced by over an inch would have almost no risk. The same degree of curvature in the chest region of a tall 10-year old girl whose spine was in balance, however, would almost certainly progress.

In Adults. In rare cases, unrecognized or untreated scoliosis in youth may progress into adulthood, with the following curvatures posing low to high risk:

Curvatures under 30 degrees almost never progress
Predicting progression at curves around 40 degrees is not clear
Curvatures over 50 degrees are at great risk for progression

Managing Scoliosis

Exercise has many health benefits and is important for maintaining strength and muscle tone and stabilizing weight. Stretching exercises may be beneficial in children whose scoliosis is due to uneven leg lengths or a shortened tendon.

Strengthening the Muscles That Turn the Torso. A promising approach focuses on training and strengthening the muscles that turn the torso. Studies using specific equipment (MedX Torso Rotation machine) are showing promise. In a 2003 study, 16 of the 20 patients experienced curve reduction, and no curves progressed. In an earlier study, patients increased strength from 12 - 40%. One girl with a severe lumbar curve required surgery, but the remaining 11 patients had no progression of curvature, and 4 of the patients experienced a reduction in their curvature. Treatment did not involve braces. Clinical trials using this approach are underway. Exercising the torso to build muscle strength is important, in any case, in conjunction with braces.

ASCO Scoliosis Treatment Method. ASCO Scoliosis Treatment Method is a Russian approach that consists of isometric and stretching exercises, vibration, spinal manipulation, and electrical muscle stimulation. Some U.S. centers are reporting success in halting curve progression, but more research is needed to determine possible benefits.

Biofeedback. Researchers have investigated biofeedback on the premise that people receiving a signal to improve posture when slumping may, in some cases, reduce their spinal deformities. (Some experts believe that braces work only because the young patients self-correct their curves by retraining their posture to avoid the discomfort of the brace.)

Chiropractic Care. Several case reports suggest that chiropractic manipulation of the spine may help stop progression of mild curves. However, no rigorous studies have proved this. One small study reported no benefits from chiropractic in girls with spinal curves less than 20 degrees. (About 80% of such curves will not progress significantly without any treatment.)

Airway Ventilation at Night. Some research has focused on the use of airway systems, such as nasal continuous positive airflow pressure, for patients with severe scoliosis and reduced lung capacity. Patients use such systems during the night to force air into the upper airways and into the lungs. In one study, the use of these devices reduced hospitalization and improved lung function, shortness of breath, and fatigue. Such systems also can treat sleep apnea, a common sleep disorder.

Breathing Exercises. Breathing exercises may help improve lung function in children with scoliosis, and signs of lung problems.

When a difference in leg lengths causes secondary scoliosis, adding lifts to the heels may decrease a mild curvature. In one study, this practice reduced the curvature by an average of 5.3 to 7.5 degrees. (Curvatures were all less than 20 degrees.) Patients with the greatest curvature experienced some muscle pain, fatigue, and even nausea during the first few days they were using the lifts, but these symptoms eased within 10 days.

Braces

A brace can prevent further progression of moderate curves of (24 - 40 degrees). However, a brace will almost never reverse an existing curve and is only used to stop progression. One study reported overall success rates of around 74%, but results vary widely depending on the length of time the brace is worn, the type of brace, and the severity of the curve. The great majority of subjects in scoliosis studies are girls. Limited data suggest that in boys compliance rates are low, and braces are not effective.

Compliance with wearing a brace correlates strongly with success rate. In analysis of 34 patients, the compliance rate for the patients whose curve progressed by more than 5 degrees was 62%, while the compliance rate for the patients who did not progress was 85%.

In overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, braces appear to be less effective than in those who are not overweight. In one 10-year multicenter retrospective study, overweight patients were about three times more likely to have an unsuccessful result with braces than were people of normal weight.

A brace is one type of treatment for scoliosis. The brace works by exerting pressure on the back and ribs to push the spine in a straighter position. The brace usually fits snugly around the torso and can come in many styles. In a child who is still growing, bracing is usually recommended to help slow the progression of the curve. The brace is usually worn full-time until the growth of the bones has stopped.

Many experts have questioned whether a brace is any better than nature in halting curvature progress. Early studies found that braces were successful in halting progression in only half of cases (the same rate as no treatment at all). In recent years, however, braces have improved. Many now fit under the arms and can be worn under clothing, so that patients are much more likely to use them for longer periods during the day, which greatly affects their success rates.

Wearing the brace for the prescribed time is difficult but essential for any success. A team approach, with several health professionals involved, is beneficial and often necessary to support the patient through the bracing process. An orthopedic surgeon interprets the x-rays, assesses the potential progression of the scoliosis, and plans the treatment with the patient and family. If a brace is used, an orthotist measures and fits the patient with the device. A physical therapist tailors an exercise program best suited for the patient. A nurse may also coordinate the treatment plans and provide physical and emotional support.

Milwaukee Brace. A full torso brace called the Milwaukee brace was the standard treatment until a decade ago. It is still used particularly for high curves.

The device contains a wide flat bar in front and two smaller ones in back. These bars attach to a ring around the neck that has rests for the chin and back of the head. One study determined that correcting the curve occurs best if the patient lies on their chest when wearing the brace. Some researchers suggest that increasing the tension on the chest straps might add benefit. The brace is also periodically adjusted for growth.

The brace needs to be worn 23 hours a day, with relief during bathing and exercise only. Compliance is a major problem. In one study, only 15% of patients wore the Milwaukee brace as directed. It is a particularly difficult brace to endure wearing; one woman who had worn it for 7 years during adolescence remembered being invisible during her school years, ignored and shunned by other children.

The Boston and TLSO Braces. Molded braces called thoracolumbar-sacral orthoses (TLSOs), most often the Boston brace, come up to beneath the underarms and can be fitted close to the skin so they do not show beneath clothing. It appears to be effective for mid-back and lower curves. In one study, treatment was judged successful in 61% of adolescents who wore Boston braces, and success correlated with wearing the brace more than 18 hours a day. Wearing the brace for 16 hours a day may still be beneficial, although the risk for curve progression is significantly higher the less time the brace is worn. These braces have problems; they are hot, reduce lung capacity by nearly 20%, and cause mild, temporary changes in kidney function.

The Charleston Bending Brace. The Charleston Bending Brace is worn only at night. Some doctors question its value, although it appears to be suitable for small, flexible curves. In a 2002 study, it was equally effective as the Boston brace. Other studies have reported success rates of 56 - 66% in patients who wore the brace as directed. Still, more than 10% of the patients using either brace eventually needed surgery.

Additional Braces in Development. New braces are being developed in an attempt to improve compliance and results. Some examples are:

The Providence brace is a computer-fitted device that is worn only at night. It is specifically designed for the individual curvature abnormalities, and early studies are showing promise.
A bracing method called the SpineCor uses adjustable bands and a cotton vest that allows flexibility. A 2003 study reported that after 2 years, the brace corrected the curve by 5 degrees in more than half the patients, while 38% were stabilized and only 7% had curvature that worsened by more than 5 degrees. A recent trial of 24 girls with idiopathic scoliosis compared the SpineCor with a TLSO-type brace. The study indicated that the SpineCor did not halt curvature progression associated with idiopathic scoliosis during the pubertal growth spurt whereas the TLSO device did.
The custom-fitted TriaC brace exerts pressure in specific areas of the back to allow greater comfort and flexibility. It may be less conspicuous than some of the older braces.

Studies are needed to determine if these or other new braces provide any additional value.

According to a 2003 study, compliance in wearing the brace averages 65% (although it varied from 8 - 90%). Patients were apt to wear them at night but often wore them sporadically during the day. The quality of life can vary by the type of brace worn. In one study, patients who had the Milwaukee brace reported greater impairment than patients with the Boston, TSLO, or Charleston braces. The choice of brace should be one that will be the most effective for a particular patient with the lowest impact on quality of life. Young people often refuse to wear braces, even the newer models, and emotional support from the family and professionals is extremely important to help a child accept the process and sustain compliance. On a positive note, one study reported that brace treatment did not negatively affect the self images of the adolescents who had to wear them.

For children who require braces, an exercise program helps boost well being, improves compliance with treatment, and keeps muscles in tone so that the transition period after brace removal is easier.

An exercise and physical therapy program is important to maintain or achieve the following:

Chest mobility.
Proper breathing. In one study, young girls who wore the Boston brace and performed aerobic exercises for 30 minutes four times a week experienced improved lung function, whereas lung function declined in girls who did not exercise.
Muscle strength (especially in the abdominal muscles).
Flexibility in the spine. One small study showed that patients who performed exercises improving flexibility in the torso experienced less spinal twisting and had improved curvature.
Correct posture. Practicing correct posture, especially in front of a mirror, is an extremely important part of any physical therapy program. A patient who is accustomed to a curved spine may have the sensation of being crooked when first taught to properly align the spine. Practicing in front of a mirror provides a reality check.
Patients must also learn to conduct daily activities while wearing the brace. Patients tend to comply with physical therapy in the period when the brace is first being used. They typically stop exercising when they have gotten used to the brace, however, and resume exercising only near the time the brace is being removed. Patients who don't stay with the program throughout the duration of brace use experience a weakening in the back at the time of removal.

Surgery

The goals of scoliosis surgery are threefold:

Straighten the spine as much as possible in a safe manner
Balance the torso and pelvic areas
Maintain correction

It takes a two-part process to accomplish these goals:

Fusing (joining together) the vertebrae along the curve
Supporting these fused bones with instrumentation (steel rods, hooks, and other devices) attached to the spine

There are many surgical variations that use different instruments, procedures, and surgical approaches to treat scoliosis. All of the operations require meticulous skill. In most cases, success depends less on the type of operation than on the skill and experience of the surgeon. The cause of scoliosis often determines the type of procedure. Parents of patients or adult patients should not be shy in asking the surgeon and hospital about their experience with the specific procedures being considered.

Surgery is usually recommended for the following children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis:

All young people whose curve exceeds 50 degrees.
Growing children whose curve has gone beyond 40 degrees. (There is still some debate, however, about whether all children with curves of 40 degrees should have surgery.)
Older children who have surgery tend to experience improved well-being from the changes in their appearance, even if they have no actual improved physical functioning.

Surgery may be required for the following children at as early an age as possible.

Those whose scoliosis is due to inborn abnormalities. (The younger they are when surgery is performed the better their chances for success.)
Children with multiple physical handicaps.

Procedures will differ depending on whether a child has idiopathic scoliosis, or scoliosis due to muscle and nerve disorders (such as muscular dystrophy or cerebral palsy). In the latter cases, children also need a team approach to reduce their risks for serious complications.

Before the operation, a doctor conducts a complete physical examination to determine leg lengths, muscle strength, lung function, and any postural abnormalities. The patient receives training in deep breathing and effective coughing to avoid lung congestion after the operation. The patient should also receive training in turning over in bed in a single movement (called log-rolling) before the operation. Psychologic intervention using cognitive-behavioral methods that help young patients cope may be very helpful in reducing anxiety and pain after surgery.

Patients are encouraged to donate their own blood before the operation for use in possible transfusions. The patient should have no sunburn, rashes, or sores on the back before the operation, which could increase the risk for infection.

Most scoliosis operations involve fusing the vertebrae. The instruments and devices used to support the fusion vary, however.

In the fusion procedure, the surgeon will:

Slice flaps to expose the backs of the vertebrae that lie along the curve.
Remove the bony outgrowths along the vertebrae that allow the spine to twist and bend.
Lay matchstick-sized bone grafts vertically across the exposed surface of each vertebra, being careful that they touch adjoining vertebrae.
Fold the flaps back to their original position, covering the bone grafts.
These grafts will regenerate, grow into the bone, and fuse the vertebrae together.

Depending upon the severity and responsiveness to other treatment, a doctor may recommend surgery for scoliosis. Surgery involves correcting the curve (although not all the way) and fusing the bones in the curve together. The surgeon lays bone grafts across the exposed surface of each vertebra. These grafts will regenerate, grow into the bone, and fuse the vertebrae together. The bones are held in place with one or two metal rods held down with hooks and screws, helping to support the fusion of the vertebrae.

Graft Materials. A surgeon takes bone grafts from the patient's hip, ribs, spine, or other bones (called autografts). This is the best quality bone. However, because autografts are taken directly from the scoliosis patient, the operation is longer and the patient experiences more pain afterward. Researchers are investigating allografts, bone grafts taken from another person or a cadaver. This would reduce the pain and duration of the operation. Allografts, however, pose an increased risk for infection from the donor.

Some surgical centers now perform spinal fusions in adults using a biologically-manufactured human bone protein instead of bone grafts. RhBMP-2 (INFUSE Bone Graft) contains a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) that helps the body grow its own bone. A surgeon inserts the protein into a pair of thimble-like cages, which are implanted between the spinal vertebrae. The cages help stabilize the spine, while the protein prompts new bone growth. Doctors hope that this new procedure can eliminate the pain of autografts and the risk of infection of allografts. Results from preliminary studies have been promising. BMP treatments are currently approved only for adults.

Healing. The healed fusions harden in a straightened position to prevent further curvature, leaving the rest of the spine flexible. It takes about 3 months for the vertebrae to fuse substantially, although 1 - 2 years are required before fusion is complete. Fusion stops growth in the spine, but most growth occurs in the long bones of the body (such as in the legs), anyway. Patients will most likely gain height from both growth in the legs and from the straighter spine. Patients may walk at a slightly slower pace after fusion, but balance may improve, and sports activities are not restricted after the procedure.

Harrington Procedure. Until 10 years ago, the standard instruments used in fusion procedures were those of the Harrington procedure, first developed in the 1960s:

To support the fusion of the vertebrae, the surgeon uses a steel rod, extending from the bottom to the top of the curve. (More than one rod may be used depending on the type of curve and whether outward curvature of the spine is present.)
The rod is attached by hooks that are suspended from pegs inserted into the bone.
Similar to changing a tire, the steel rod is jacked up and then locked into place to support the spine securely. The surgeon is then ready to fuse the vertebrae together.
After this operation, patients must wear a full body cast and lie in bed for 3 - 6 months until fusion is complete enough to stabilize the spine.
After 1 - 2 years, the steel rod is not really necessary, but it is almost always left in place unless infection or other complications occur.

The Harrington procedure is very difficult to undergo, particularly for young people, and although the operation can achieve a correction of the curve of over 50%, studies have reported a loss in this correction of between 10 - 25% over time. The procedure does not correct the rotation of the spine and, therefore, does not improve an existing rib hump that was caused by the rotation. The operation does not interfere with normal pregnancies and deliveries later in life.

Certain complications may occur from this procedure:

About 40% of Harrington patients have a condition called the flat back syndrome, because the procedure eliminates normal lordosis (the inward curving of the lower back). Flat back syndrome from the Harrington procedure does not cause any immediate pain. In later years, however, the disks may collapse below the fusion, making it difficult to stand erect, and the condition can cause significant pain and emotional distress.
Studies have reported that 5 - 7 years after their surgery, between a fifth and a third of patients who had the Harrington procedure experienced low back pain. (In one study, only 3% had experienced back pain before surgery.) In such cases, however, the pain was not severe enough to interfere with normal activities and did not require additional surgery.
Children younger than age 11 whose skeleton is immature and who have the Harrington procedure have a fairly high risk for a specific curve progression called the crankshaft phenomenon. This condition occurs when the front of the fused spine continues to grow after the procedure. The spine cannot grow longer, so it twists and develops a curvature. In one study that followed patients for 5 - 16 years, crankshaft curve progression was moderate, however, with the Cobb angle averaging 9 degrees and rotation averaging 7 degrees.

Cotrel-Dubousset Procedure. The Cotrel-Dubousset procedure not only corrects the curve but also may help correct rotation, and it does not cause flat back syndrome.

With this procedure, a surgeon cross links parallel rods for better stability in holding the fused vertebrae. Improvement in correction averaged 66% in one study, with a later correction loss reported to be 5%. (Other studies have reported loss of curvature correction at less than 2%.) Over 95% of patients reported the results to be good or very good (only 86% of patients who had the Harrington procedure experienced the same levels of satisfaction). Patients often go home in 5 days and may be back in school in 3 weeks.

Complication rates are similar to the Harrington procedure but with some differences:

Operation time and blood loss are greater than with the Harrington procedure.
Cotrel-Dubousset and other procedures that are designed to reverse the rotation of the spine have less risk for flat back syndrome, but they have a higher risk for spinal imbalance than the Harrington procedure.
Failure rates are about 25% after 10 years, which is very high. Experts hope that the advances in current scoliosis procedures will help reduce the long-term adverse effects.

The Texas Scottish-Rite Hospital (TSRH) Instrumentation. The Texas Scottish-Rite Hospital (TSRH) instrumentation is similar to the Cotrel-Dubousset procedure in that it uses parallel rods and other devices that reverse rotation as well as improve curvature. TSRH, however, uses smooth rods and hooks that are designed to make removal or adjustment easier later on if complications arise. Complications are similar to the Cotrel-Dubousset procedure.

Additional Forms of Instrumentation. Other instrumentation procedures have refined the hardware used in the Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset operations.

After surgeons developed Luque instrumentation to help maintain normal lordosis, experts hoped that bracing would not be needed afterward. Several studies showed, however, that without braces, correction was lost after this operation, and the procedure may have a higher risk for spinal cord injury than other standard procedures. Luque instrumentation is used primarily in people whose scoliosis is due to problems of nerves and muscles, such as in children with cerebral palsy.
Wisconsin segmental spine instrumentation (WSSI) is as safe as the Harrington rod and nearly as strong as the Luque instrumentation.
The Dorsal Dynamic Spondylodesis (DDS) system, under testing in Germany, is a semirigid system that allows for greater flexibility of the spine.

Instrumentation for Anterior Approach. The anterior approach, in which the surgeon performs the operation by opening the chest wall, requires specific hardware. Halm-Zielke instrumentation, for example, uses TSRH instrumentation with bone grafts constructed from ribs to prop open the spaces between the disks. It allows true three-dimensional curve correction. However, it does not solve specific problems with this approach -- higher risks for kyphosis (an outward curve) and pseudoarthrosis (a false joint at the fusion site). Variants using two rod systems, fusion cages, or other instruments appear to improve this procedure.

Posterior Approach (Through the Back). Many surgeons use a posterior approach for scoliosis, which reaches the surgical area by opening the back of the patient. It has been the gold standard for decades and is generally used with Harrington instrumentation. The posterior approach has advantages and disadvantages:

Advantages. Surgeons are familiar with it, so fusion rates are excellent, curve correction is good, and it has few complications.
Disadvantages. Preadolescent children are at risk for the crankshaft phenomenon (a worsening of the curve) later on. (Newer posterior instrumentation, such as the Isola instrumentation, may prevent this occurrence.) The posterior approach also does not always correct hypokyphosis (the loss of normal outward curvature) in the thoracic (upper) spine. The procedure is not always effective for curves in the thoracolumbar region (where the upper and lower spine meet) and may cause spinal abnormalities there.

Anterior Approach (Through the Front). Increasingly, surgeons are using the anterior approach, in which the surgeon performs the operation through the chest wall (called a thoracotomy). With the anterior approach, the surgeon makes an incision in the chest, deflates the lung, and removes a rib in order to reach the spine. This rib can be used during the operation as a strut to support the spine. It also may be repositioned within the patient until it is used for bone grafting during fusion.

The anterior approach also has its advantages and disadvantages:

Advantages. Because the frontal approach allows the procedure to be performed higher up in the spine than with standard procedures, the patient may have a lower risk for lower-back injury later on. In addition, transfusion rates are much lower with the anterior approach. With increasing experience, the anterior approach is as effective as the posterior approach.
Disadvantages. It is a more recent procedure than the posterior approach, and, among inexperienced surgeons, carries a higher risk for complications than in the more standard posterior approach. One study noted poorer lung function 2 years after surgery than with the posterior approach, possibly because the wide chest incision impairs the chest muscles, which can affect lung function afterward. Anterior instrumentation poses a risk for hyperkyphosis (exaggerated outward curvature) and a higher risk for pseudoarthrosis, a painful condition in which a false joint develops at the fusion site. Hardware failure rates may also be higher in the anterior approach than in the posterior approach. Increasing experience and newer hardware designs are reducing many of these problems.

The Combined Anterior-Posterior Approach. The combination approach uses an anterior approach first, which allows better correction of the problems. The fusion part of the operation is done with the posterior approach. This is a very long and complex procedure. It appears to be safe, however, and is proving to be useful, even in very young patients, for preventing the crankshaft phenomenon. It also may correct large rigid curves and specific severe curves in the thoracic spine.

Researchers are evaluating new approaches to treating thoracic scoliosis in adolescents and children. Researchers in Germany are studying the effects of implanting a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib. This implant expands the thoracic cavity, thereby correcting the curvature and allowing spinal, thoracic, and lung growth. Early experience with 15 children showed improvement of thoracic insufficiency syndrome and ability to sit, in addition to greatly improvement cosmetic appearance.

Researchers in the U.S. recently compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes and pulmonary function in patients treated with either anterior thoracoscopic or traditional posterior surgery. The anterior thoracoscopic surgery uses a video-assisted anterior approach and recently developed spinal instrumentation. There were 28 patients in the thoracoscopic group (average, 14.6 years of age) and 23 patients in the posterior fusion group (average, 14.3 years of age). The researchers found no significant differences between the groups in terms of kyphosis, coronal balance, or tilt angle. Advantages of the anterior thoracoscopic approach include the need for fewer vertebral levels fused, less blood loss, and lower transfusion rate, yet the operative time was nearly 2 times longer than for the posterior approach.

While both of these new treatments have shown some early positive results, more research will be needed to determine their true value.

Complication rates are high (nearly 10%) with any of these procedures, including the standard Harrington method and the newer Cotrel-Dubousset procedure.

Complications for all procedures include allergic reactions to anesthesia and the following:

Bleeding. Standard procedures increase the risk for major blood loss during the procedure. Patients are encouraged to donate blood before the operation for use in possible transfusions. Children sometimes require more than one transfusion following surgery. Researchers are investigating various methods for reducing the need for transfusions.

In one study, patients received erythropoietin (rhEPO) before the procedure. RhEPO is a hormone that acts in the bone marrow to increase the production of red blood cells. Patients who received this hormone, particularly those with idiopathic scoliosis, needed fewer transfusions and spent less time in the hospital than those who did not receive rhEPO.

Newer endoscopic techniques are reducing the need for transfusions.

Postoperative Pain. Some pain always follows these procedures, requiring intravenous administration of potent painkillers right after the operation (endoscopic procedures may require only mild pain relievers). Of some concern is a study suggesting that the use of NSAIDs, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aspirin, Motrin, Advil), for pain relief right after fusion may increase the risk for fusion failure. Until more research is conducted, these common painkillers should not be routinely used immediately after surgery.

Infection. Infection is always a risk with any operation. One study reported changes in the immune system for about 3 weeks after surgery, which indicated a greater risk for infection. Researchers recommended being very vigilant for signs of infection, including in the pancreas and urinary tract. Doctors also recommend antibiotics, given by injection for 2 - 5 days after surgery and by mouth for 1 - 2 weeks longer.

Nerve Damage. Patients often worry about neurologic injuries, but the risk is actually very low. In general, nerve injury occurs in 1% of patients, with the risk highest in adults. If neurologic damage occurs, it most often causes muscle weakness. Paralysis is very rare and can be prevented using monitoring techniques during the operation. Nearly all monitoring procedures use a so-called wake-up test, in which the patient is brought out of anesthesia during or at the end of the procedure and assessed for sensations to be sure no injury has occurred. One simple method is to wake patients up in the middle of their operations and ask them to wiggle their toes. More sophisticated methods measure the electrical activity of the spinal cord; if the monitor indicates a fall in electrical response and possible injury, the surgeon adjusts his techniques to avoid further damage to the spinal cord.

Pseudoarthrosis. If the fusion fails to heal, pseudoarthrosis, a painful condition in which a false joint develops at the site, may develop. In one study, teenagers who smoked and heavier adolescents (over 154 pounds) who had hyperkyphosis (hunchback) were at higher risk for this complication. The anterior approach may pose a higher risk for pseudoarthrosis. One study reported that pseudoarthrosis may be undiagnosed, and rates may average 20% after surgery, therefore acting as a major contributor to post-surgery pain.

Disk Degeneration and Low Back Pain. Fusion in the lumbar area produces great stress on the lower back and eventually can cause disk degeneration. Loss of trunk mobility, balance, and muscle strength from surgical treatments can also cause lower back pain and chronic problems in future years. Patients who are surgically treated with fusion techniques lose flexibility; their back muscles may be weakened if they were injured during surgery. In most cases, however, the consequences are mild to moderate.

Lung Function. Some patients may develop serious lung problems after surgery. These complications are highest in children whose scoliosis is due to neuromuscular problems, such as spina bifida, cerebral palsy, or muscular dystrophy. Lung problems can occur up to 1 week after surgery. Lung function may not become completely normal until 1 - 2 months after surgery.

Other Complications. Other problems can include, but are not limited to, the following:

Hooks dislodging or a fused vertebra fracturing
Gallstones
Pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas). Among adolescents, this complication tends to occur more often among those who are older or who have a lower body mass index.
Intestinal obstruction

Click the icon to see an image of gallstones.

Patients must perform breathing and coughing exercises shortly after the procedure and continue them through the recovery process to rid the lungs of congestion. The patient is usually able to sit up the day after the operation, and most patients can move on their own within a week. A brace may be necessary, depending on the procedure. With the anterior approach in the upper back, patients may have some trouble with activities involving the arms and hands -- such as tying shoes and cutting food. In one study, however, occupational therapy using stretching and strengthening exercises allowed for full resumption of daily activities, including dressing, bathing, and grooming, within 3 months.

Patients are often concerned that surgery will stiffen their backs, but most cases of scoliosis affect the upper back, which has only limited movement, so that patients do not notice much difference. It may take a year or more for muscle strength to return. In some cases, the operation cannot completely correct the curve, and one leg may be shorter than the other. Heel lifts may help in this case.

Patients may need a corrective procedure called revision or salvage surgery, usually for one of these reasons:

Failure of the previous procedure
Curvature progression around the fusion site
Disk degeneration
Poor posture alignment

Minimally invasive surgery is an alternative to spinal fusion. These types of surgeries use a few small incisions and cause less scarring than standard open approaches that require wide cuts. However, these surgeries are limited to certain patients and are not yet as frequently performed as spinal fusion surgeries.

Endoscopy. In endoscopy, the surgeon makes small incisions and inserts tubes that contain tiny instruments and cameras through the incisions in order to view and execute the procedure. In most cases, the procedure occurs in two stages:

First, the surgeon uses the anterior approach to remove disk material and loosen the spine.
They follow with a posterior for fusion and instrumentation.

Recovery after surgery is rapid. Most patients are out of bed 2 days after surgery. Endoscopy causes fewer and smaller scars, and an easier recovery, than more invasive surgical approaches.

However, the endoscopic procedure for scoliosis is complicated, and few surgeons are trained to perform it. The surgery is generally used only for single curves in the upper back or for patients with a curve in the upper back and a compensating curve in the lower back. Some surgeons are now able to operate on areas below the diaphragm, including the lumbar spine. The patients must still wear a brace for 3 months after surgery. Long-term studies are required to compare results to those of standard procedures.

Growing Rod Technique. This technique is used for very young children in whom bracing has not helped. Instead of doing spinal fusion, doctors surgically insert a rod into the patient’s back. Additional surgeries are performed every 6 months to extend the rod so that the spine can continue to grow. Some growing rod techniques use a single rod, while others use two rods. Studies suggest that dual rods are stronger than single rods, which may help provide better spinal stability and correction.

Vertebral Body Stapling. Vertebral body stapling is an experimental technique that may prevent curve progression in some young patients with curves less than 50 degrees. It involves stapling the convex (outer) curve of the anterior spine (the side of the spine facing the chest), which helps stabilize and reduce progression of the inner (concave) curve. The procedure uses a special metal device that is clamp-shaped at body temperature but can be straightened when subjected to cold temperatures and inserted into the spine. When warmed up, the staple returns to its clamp shape and supports the spine.

Treatment for Adult Scoliosis

Adults who were surgically treated for scoliosis in their youth are at risk for disk degeneration and spinal fusion failure. In most adults with previous scoliosis, moderate exercise is not harmful and is extremely important for maintaining healthy supportive muscles and preventing disk degeneration. However, people who have only one or two mobile lumbar vertebrae below the area that was fused during surgery should avoid activity or exercise that causes excessive twisting on the spine. Some experts believe this may accelerate spinal degeneration.

In most cases of adult scoliosis, nonsurgical care is preferred if possible. This can include patient education, exercises, and medical treatments. Braces are not useful.

One center reported that epidural steroid injections were a beneficial alternative to surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Candidates for Surgery. In general, pain is the most common reason for surgery in adult scoliosis. Surgery may be recommended in the following cases:

Curvatures over 50 degrees with persistent pain.
Surgery is almost always recommended for adults with curvatures over 60 degrees.
Progressive mid and low back curve or low back curve with persistent pain.
Reduced heart and lung function. Most surgeons, however, will not operate on adults with severely impaired lung function and heart failure. Once this has occurred, surgery will not help improve lung capacity and may cause the condition to worsen, at least temporarily.
Significant deformity is present. Adults should not expect to achieve a completely straight spine, however. There is a high risk for nerve damage if the spine is over-corrected, and adult spines are less flexible than children's are. Usually, however, the correction achieves an acceptable cosmetic improvement.

Surgeons prefer to operate on adults under 50 years old, although surgery may be appropriate in some older people.

Standard Scoliosis Procedures in Adult Scoliosis. The procedures involve the following depending on whether the patient had been treated previously or not:

In patients who have not had previous treatment and who have degenerative lumbar scoliosis, the procedure is often a diskectomy (removal of the diseased disks) followed by scoliosis procedures (instrumentation and fusion).
In patients with previously treated scoliosis, the only remedy is removal of the old instrumentation, extension of the fusion, and implementation of new instrumentation and bone grafts.

Surgical procedures in adult scoliosis are complex and undertaken only after careful consideration and all nonsurgical methods have been exhausted. Adults have a much higher risk than children for complications, including pneumonia, infection, poor wound healing, and persistent pain. In addition, procedures in adults often involve fusion in lumbar and sacral areas (the low back), which can cause several complications. Some experts believe that the risks of operations in this area nearly always outweigh any benefits in adults. Most studies on adults have also reported low success rates.

Others argue that without an operation, the back will become unstable and painful. In addition, most studies on adults report on procedures using the old Harrington instrumentation techniques. Advances in instrumentation are increasing success rates in adults.

In a recent study, for example, adults who underwent anterior fusion and instrumentation had excellent results. In another study of newer generation instrumentation, 87% of adult patients reported satisfaction.

Wedge Osteotomy. Researchers are investigating wedge osteotomy in patients with mature spines, as corrective surgery and as an alternative to braces. In this procedure, a surgeon cuts wedges of bone from the concave side of the curve. The surgeon then straightens the spine by inserting a temporary rod and closing the cut sections. The patient needs to wear a brace and restrict activity for about 12 weeks or until the bone has healed. The patient can resume normal activities when a surgeon removes the rod, and the spine is mobile.

Resources

www.scoliosis.org -- National Scoliosis Foundation
www.srs.org -- Scoliosis Research Society
www.scoliosis-assoc.org - - Scoliosis Association
www.aaos.org -- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
www.niams.nih.gov -- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
www.ispine.com -- Information on the spine

References

Akbarnia BA, Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O, Thompson AG, Asher MA. Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine. 2005;30(17 Suppl):S46-S57.

Helenius I, Jalanko H, Remes V, Sairanen H, Salminen S, Holmberg C, et al. Scoliosis after solid organ transplantation in children and adolescents. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(2):324-330.

Hell AK, Campbell RM, Hefti F. The vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib implant for the treatment of thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with congenital and neuromuscular scoliosis in young children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14:287-293.

Hung VW, Qin L, Cheung CS, Lam TP, Ng BK, Tse YK, et al. Osteopenia: a new prognostic factor of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(12):2709-2716.

Lee WT, Cheung CS, Tse YK, Guo X, Qin L, Lam TP, et al. Association of osteopenia with curve severity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study of 919 girls. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(12):1924-1932.

Lonner BS, Kondrachov D, Siddiqi F, Hayes V, Charf C. Thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88A:1022-1034.

Luhmann SJ, Bridwell KH, Cheng I, Imamura T, Lenke LG, Schootman M. Use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 for adult spinal deformity. Spine. 2005;30(17 Suppl):S110-S117.

Thompson GH, Akbarnia BA, Kostial P, Poe-Kochert C, Armstrong DG, Roh J, et al. Comparison of single and dual growing rod techniques followed through definitive surgery: a preliminary study. Spine. 2005;30(18):2039-2044.

Yuan N, Fraire JA, Margetis MM, Skaggs DL, Tolo VT, Keens TG. The effect of scoliosis surgery on lung function in the immediate postoperative period. Spine. 2005;30(19):2182-2185.

Review Date:
4/6/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Faboo Engagement Rings

FabSugar — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:00:22 -0700

In celebration of the official wedding season and the launch of our sister site, IDoSugar, I decided to delve, fingers first, into faboo engagement rings. Engagement rings come in all styles and (I promise) there's something out there that'll tickle your fancy. I'm an unconventional gal and would prefer something a bit more untraditional. After all, I'll be wearing the ring for the rest of my life and would want it to reflect my Fab style and taste. Let that be your mantra when you're deciding on one, too!

To see all of our wedding coverage, check out IDoSugar.com!

Mawi Cluster teardrop necklace	Hand-painted Enamel Giraffe Bangle - Bracelets - Women - JCrew.com
Desert Drop Earrings - Earrings - Women - JCrew.com	Faceted Bangle
Jose & Maria Barrera Multi-Strand Necklace-Neiman Marcus	Philippe Audibert Wide Crystal Bracelet
Forever21.com - Product C6	Forever21.com - Product C6

Source