PopSugar

Is Free-Range Meat Healthier?

FitSugar — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:30:00 -0700

There are many phrases stamped on food labels designed to make food appear both ecologically sound as well as healthier to eat. One phrase that I find confusing is “free range,” which I have also seen it written as “free roaming.” While it sounds idyllic, the first bit of info you need to know is that this term “free range” isn’t heavily regulated by the USDA. The only requirement is that the animals have access to outdoor areas of where they could possibly “roam free.” The regulations do not specify how big the area needs to be either. This by itself, by no means, makes meat any healthier than conventional meat. Also beware “free-range” doesn't mean free of E. coli or salmonella.

When it comes to selecting meat, you want to look for are the words “hormone free” and “antibiotic free,” since both substances are stored in the animals fat and flesh and then passed onto you. Look for word “organic” too. This way you know the animal was fed pesticide-free foods. When it comes to beef, the ultimate label is grass fed and finished since the meat of grass-fed animals is higher in omega-3 fatty acids and beta carotene. Unfortunately, the USDA doesn’t regulate this term either. This is why it is best to find a ranch that follows the practices you believe in. Check out Local Harvest to find one near you.

Source

Label-Able: Free Range

FitSugar — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:30:00 -0800

The labels on food today were standardized to make it easier for us to figure out what exactly we are putting into our bodies. The fact is, reading the labels is still downright confusing so let FIT make you label-able.

Free Range, or Free Roaming is a term we see a lot when buying eggs and poultry. Sounds healthy, but is it? read more

Free Range (or Free Roaming) is supposed to mean that the product comes from an animal that was raised in the wide open air. What it really means is that producers must demonstrate to the USDA that the poultry "has been allowed access to the outside." Five minutes may be all the animals get, but it will still be considered Free Range by the USDA. The terms are somewhat regulated by the USDA for poultry but not at all for eggs.

Fit's Tip: When it comes to animal rights, Free Range products are more humane (but barely) than ordinary products, but when it comes to your health Free Range eggs or poultry do not have any proven health benefits. I think they should change the label from "Free Range" to "Five Minutes is All They Got."

You'll Never Miss the Meat: Conscious Cook Cookbook

FitSugar — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:30:09 -0700

We know that eating less meat is a good thing - it reduces your carbon footprint, lowers your grocery bill, and makes sense for your heart. But does it taste good? Vegetarian diets are often associated with a bland menu of tofu, sprouts, and brown rice day after day. Chef to the stars Tal Ronnen sets out to bust this myth in his new cookbook, The Conscious Cook - Delicious Meatless Recipes That Will Change the Way You Eat ($20).

The cookbook is divided into sections by meal courses that include starters, soups, entrées, and desserts. I'm most excited about the entire section devoted to sandwiches because of all the new lunches I get to try. There's a nice intro that covers Ronnen's must haves in the kitchen - from what items he always has in his pantry (agave nectar) to the chef tools he can't live without (food processor). Ronnen touches on the importance of a vegan diet but does it without making you feel like you're choking on someone else's politics. It's obvious the chef's main focus is making food that tastes exceptional.

To hear more about The Conscious Cook and see a killer quinoa recipe, read more.

Each of the 75 recipes features a protein and ranges from the comforting - free-form ravioli with tofu ricotta and arugula pesto - to the sophisticated - peppercorn-encrusted portobello fillets with yellow tomato bearnaise and mashed potatoes. And every recipe has an inspiring photo accompanying it.

What's great about this cookbook is its range and its approach to meatless cooking. No main dish ever feels like a side dish, which can happen a lot in vegan and vegetarian cooking. Instead, each meal is made to be complete and satisfying. There are recipes for a quick or casual meal, but if you want to pull out all the stops, there are recipes for that too. As an added nice touch, there are seasonally driven dinner menus included at the end.

Quinoa, Avocado, and Sweet Potato Timbale With Roasted Tomatillo Dressing
The Conscious Cook: Delicious Meatless Recipes That Will Change the Way You Eat

Ingredients

For the quinoa:
1 cup quinoa, cooked in vegetable stock according to the package directions and cooled to room temperature
1/2 jalapeno, minced
1 tablespoon minced fresh cilantro
1 tablespoon extra-virgin olive oil
Juice of 1 lime
Salt and freshly ground pepper to taste

For the sweet potatoes:
1 sweet potato, peeled and cut into 1/2-inch dice
2 teaspoons extra-virgin olive oil
Sea salt and freshly ground pepper

For the dressing:
2 tomatillos in olive oil, skins removed
3 tablespoons plus 1 teaspoon olive oil
1 tablespoon rice vinegar
1/4 cup chopped cilantro
1 teaspoon light agave nectar
Sea salt and freshly ground pepper

For the tortilla strips:
Canola oil
2 corn tortillas, cut into 1/4-inch strips
1 teaspoon Cajun seasoning

To serve:
2 avocados, diced
Microgreens

You'll also need 4 salad plates, a food processor, and a 3-inch ring mold.

Directions
1. Make the quinoa: Place all the of the quinoa ingredients in a medium bowl and toss to combine.
2. Make the sweet potatoes: Preheat the oven to 400 degrees. In a small bowl, toss the sweet potatoes with the oil, and season with salt and pepper to taste. Spread in a single layer on a baking sheet and roast for 15 minutes, or until soft in the middle and lightly browned. Be careful not to let the sweet potatoes burn.
3. Make the dressing: Lower the oven temperature to 350 degrees. In a small bowl, toss the tomatillos with 1 teaspoon of the oil. Place on a baking sheet and roast for 15 minutes. Transfer to a food processor, add vinegar, cilantro, and agave nectar, and pulse to combine. With the motor running, pour in the remaining 3 tablespoons oil in a thin stream. Continue blending until emulsified. Season with salt and pepper to taste.
4. Make the tortilla strips: Pour 2 inches of oil into a small, heavy pot and heat until the oil shimmers. Add the tortilla strips and fry until crisp and browned, 1 to 2 minutes. Drain on paper towels and sprinkle with the Cajun seasoning.
5. Assemble the salads: Place a 3-inch ring mold in the center of one of the 4 salad plates. Fill with 1/4 of the quinoa mixture and press down with a spoon to pack the mold, smoothing the top. Place 1/4 of the sweet potato pieces on top of the quinoa and press down gently. Top with 1/4 of the avocado and press down gently. Carefully remove the mold. Repeat on the remaining salad plates.
6. Carefully place 2 tortilla strips parallel to each other about 1 inch apart on top of each timbale. Place 2 more tortilla strips perpendicular on top of those. Top the timbales with the microgreens and drizzle the dressing around the timbales.

Makes 4 servings
Prep time: 45 minutes

Print recipe with images | without images

The Buffalo Guys Say Give Buffalo a Chance

partysugar — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:50:15 -0700

When I first heard that buffalo meat was leaner than chicken, I thought the joke was on me. However, it's true: Due to the fact that buffalo is a wild animal, it has less body fat than its domestic counterpart. Take a look at the buffalo steaks and you'll notice that it lacks the fatty marblization found in beef. Recently, I was invited to an event hosted by the Buffalo Guys, an odd couple who raise free-range organic buffalo. They turn the meat into a variety of products, from hot dogs to steaks.

Being a buffalo virgin, I was incredibly surprised at how good it tasted. The steaks were pink, moist, and meaty. I falsely assumed that buffalo would be gamy or more like lamb. If I hadn't known it was buffalo, I would have guessed the steaks were a lean cut of beef. It's extremely important to properly cook the meat because it can dry out quickly. Generally a buffalo steak cooks a few minutes less than a beef steak.

Check out my photos below and tell me: have you eaten buffalo? What did you think of it?

View 9 Photos ›

Prostate cancer

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:05 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Prognosis
Risk Factors
Symptoms
Conditions with Similar Sym...
Screening and Diagnosis
Tests to Determine Severity...
Treatment
Treatment Options by Stagin...
Treatment for Localized Pro...
Surgery
Radiation Treatments
Options if Treatments Fail...
Other Treatments
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

New Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer

In 2007, the American Urological Association (AUA) released updated guidelines for treatment of localized prostate cancer. The guidelines recommend that:

Patients should be classified as low, intermediate, or high risk, depending on their PSA levels, cancer stage, and tumor aggressiveness.
Doctors need to consider patients’ personal preferences and quality of life concerns as well as their clinical status.
Standard treatment options include active surveillance (watchful waiting), surgery, or radiation therapy. Initial androgen deprivation therapy (hormone therapy) is seldom recommended for localized prostate cancer.

New Guidelines for Androgen Deprivation Therapy

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2007 guidelines recommend that doctors delay androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer until patients develop symptoms. When treatment is started, ASCO recommends either removal of both testicles (orchiectomy) or luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) drug treatment.
Androgen deprivation therapy can increase the risks for heart disease death and diabetes, according to a 2006 Journal of Clinical Oncology study.

Diagnosis

Experts do not recommend prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests for men over age 70, yet many of these men continue to receive unnecessary tests, indicates a 2006 Journal of the American Medical Association study.
A new investigational test for early prostate cancer antigen-2 (EPCA-2) may be more accurate than the PSA test and may eventually replace it, suggests a 2007 study in Urology.

Genetic Research

Researchers have identified a set of genetic variations that may account for about 68% of prostate cancer cases in African-American men. Scientists hope that further investigation of this chromosomal region may help in developing genetic tests for prostate cancer.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is a malignant tumor that arises in the prostate gland. As with any cancer, if it is advanced or left untreated in early stages, it can eventually spread through the blood and lymph fluid to other organs. Fortunately, prostate cancer tends to be slow growing compared to other cancers. As many as 90% of all prostate cancers remain dormant and clinically unimportant for decades. This high incidence of latent or incidental malignancy is unique to the prostate gland. Most older men eventually develop at least microscopic evidence of prostate cancer, but it often grows so slowly that, as one specialist has written, many men with prostate cancer "die with it, rather than from it."

The prostate gland is an organ that surrounds the urinary urethra in men. It secretes fluid which mixes with sperm to make semen.

Male hormones (androgens) play major roles in the development of prostate cancer. Some research, for example, reports a higher risk with increasing testosterone and a lower risk with increasing estrogen levels. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is the principal male hormone in the prostate gland. It affects the size of the prostate gland itself and may play a role in prostate cancer. Nevertheless, researchers have not yet fully clarified the specific mechanisms that may be important in the development of this disease. Most likely, genetic mutations affecting androgens trigger the process. Certain growth hormones, such as insulin-like growth factor-I, are unrelated to testosterone and may increase the risk for prostate cancer.

Description of the Prostate Gland

The prostate gland is located between the bladder and the rectum and wraps around the urethra (the tube that carries urine through the penis). It is basically composed of three different cell types:

Smooth muscle cells, which contract during sex and squeeze the fluid from the glandular cells into the urethra, where it mixes with sperm and other fluids to make semen
Glandular cells, which produce a milky fluid that liquefies semen
Stromal cells (which form the structure of the prostate)

The central area of the prostate that wraps around the urethra is called the transition zone. The entire prostate gland is surrounded by a dense, fibrous capsule.

Functions of the Prostate Gland

The prostate gland provides the following functions:

The glandular cells produce a milky fluid, and during sex the smooth muscles contract and squeeze this fluid into the urethra. Here, it mixes with sperm and other fluids to make semen.
The prostate gland also contains an enzyme, called 5 alpha-reductase, that converts testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, another male hormone that has a major impact on the prostate.

Changes During the Lifespan

The prostate gland undergoes many changes during the course of a man's life. At birth, the prostate is about the size of a pea. It grows only slightly until puberty, when it begins to enlarge rapidly, attaining normal adult size and shape, about that of a walnut, when a man reaches his early 20s. The gland generally remains stable until about the mid-forties, when, in most men, the prostate begins to enlarge again through a process of cell multiplication.

Click the icon to see an image of the male reproductive anatomy.

Prognosis

Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer in the U.S. Only lung cancer causes more cancer deaths in American men. The lifetime probability of developing prostate cancer is about 16%. Each year, approximately 218,890 men in the United States will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, and about 27,050 will die from the disease. According to the American Cancer Society, 5-year survival rates for all stages of prostate cancer have increased during the past 20 years from 67% to nearly 100%.

A survival rate indicates the percentage of patients who live a specific number of years after the cancer is diagnosed. For prostate cancer, the 10-year survival rate is 93% and the 15-year survival rate is 77%. After 15 years, survival rates stabilize. A 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that men who are diagnosed with low-grade prostate cancers have a minimal risk of dying from prostate cancer up to 20 years after diagnosis. However, men diagnosed with more severe forms of prostate cancer have a higher risk of dying within 10 years.

Treatment of prostate cancer varies depending on the stage of the cancer (i.e., spread) and may include surgical removal, radiation, chemotherapy, hormonal manipulation or a combination of these treatments.

Because so many prostate tumors are low-grade and slow growing, survival rates are excellent when prostate cancer is detected in its early stages. Cure rates can be as high as 98% in some cases.

Click the icon to see an image of the pelvic lymph nodes.

Locally Advanced. If the disease is at the locally-advanced stage, in which it has spread beyond the prostate but only to nearby regions, it is more difficult to cure, but survival rates can be prolonged for years in many men. (When cancer has metastasized to the pelvic lymph nodes, the outlook is worse than if it has spread to other areas.)

Metastasized Cancer. If prostate cancer has spread to distant organs (metastasized), average survival time is 1 - 3 years, but some of these patients may live longer or die of other causes.

If cancer recurs after initial treatment for early-stage tumors, it is still potentially curable if it is contained within the prostate, although in most cases the cancer has spread. Hormone treatments for such recurring cancers can often prolong survival for years, although the cancer almost always returns again.

Risk Factors

The major risk factors for prostate cancer include genetic, dietary, and environmental factors that affect male hormones (androgens) and make a man more susceptible to this cancer.

Prostate cancer occurs almost exclusively in men over age 40 and most often after age 50. It is estimated that by age 70, about 65% of men have at least microscopic evidence of prostate cancers. Fortunately, the cancer is often very slow growing and older men with the cancer nearly always die of something else.

Heredity plays a role in some types of prostate cancers. Men with a family history of the disease have a higher risk of developing prostate cancer. Having one family member with prostate cancer doubles a man's own risk, and having three family members increases risk by 11-fold.

In 1998, scientists discovered a gene, located on chromosome 1, which may be involved in 1 in 500 cases of prostate cancer. They named this gene HPC1. (HPC stands for “hereditary prostate cancer.”) In 2005, scientists announced another major breakthrough in understanding the genetic components of prostate cancer. Research published in Science suggested that, in some cases, prostate cancer occurs when a specific set of genes merge. The genes are part of the ETS gene family and include ETV1, ETV4, and ERG.

In 2007, three separate studies published in Nature Genetics focused on DNA variations located on chromosome 8 in the 8q24 region. The research suggested that men who carry these genetic variations have a substantially increased risk of developing prostate cancer. The DNA variations may be associated with as many as 32% of prostate cancers in Caucasian men and 68% of prostate cancer cases in African-American men.

Doctors hope that future research will help develop genetic tests to identify men most at risk and, eventually, targeted drug therapy for prostate cancer.

A gene is a short segment of DNA which is interpreted by the body as a plan or template for building a specific protein. Genes reside within long strands of DNA which in turn make up the chromosomes.

African-American men have the world's highest risk for prostate cancer, more than 50% higher than the risk for Caucasian males. The disease is also more lethal among African-Americans. Men who live in Asia have lower risks for prostate cancer, but their risk increases if they move to North America. This indicates that there are unknown environmental or dietary factors that can alter a man's underlying genetic risk of developing this disease.

Socioeconomic Issues. The higher mortality rates in African-American men may be partly due to socioeconomic factors, such as lack of insurance, irregular screening and a late diagnosis, and unequal access to health care.

Dietary Factors. Dietary factors may play some small role in the higher risk in African-American men. This is suggested by the fact that prostate cancer is rare in many parts of Africa.

Biologic Factors. Evidence suggests that African-American and Asian men have certain genetic factors that may affect male hormones differently and may help account in part for the higher risk in the first group and the lower risk in the second.

Higher PSA Levels. African-American men also tend to have higher PSA levels than Caucasians. They are overdiagnosed with prostate cancer by 37% compared to 15% in Caucasians using PSA screening tests.

Chemicals. The relationship between prostate cancer and chemical exposure is controversial. Men whose work involves heavy labor and those exposed to certain metals and chemicals, including cadmium, dimethylformamide, and acrylonitrile, may be at higher risk for prostate cancer. Some studies have indicated that farmers might be at higher risk.

A 2001 study concluded that certain leisure activities may expose men to the same chemicals as those that pose a possible danger in the industrial setting. These chemicals included:

Home or furniture maintenance
Painting, stripping, or varnishing furniture
Activities that involved exposure to lubricating oils or greases, metal dust, or pesticides or garden sprays

Scientists think that specific genes that affect the body's response to viruses may be associated with certain types of prostate cancer. Some theories suggest that there may be a relationship between prostate cancer and infections, such as herpes virus, human papillomavirus, and cytomegalovirus. In 2006, scientists identified a new virus, XMRV, which is 30 times more common in men with prostate cancer who have a genetic mutation with the HPC1 gene. Scientists know that men who have the HPC1 genetic mutation are more likely to get prostate cancer. This new research suggests that the genetic mutation may make them more vulnerable to a virus that causes the cancer. Researchers will continue to investigate XMRV and other possible infectious causes of prostate cancer.

Obesity. Obesity may increase the risk for prostate cancer, particularly more aggressive forms of the disease. Obesity may also make prostate cancer more difficult to diagnose. A 2005 study found that overweight and obese men were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer and to die of the disease than normal-weight men.

Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers and Sunlight. Some studies report that patients with prostate cancer and a history of nonmelanoma skin may have a higher risk for a poorer outlook. Such skin cancers are highly associated with exposure to sunlight. However, sunlight triggers production of vitamin D in the body, which research indicates may help protect against prostate cancer. Prostate cancer rates are, in fact, lower in southern, sunny regions.

Vasectomy. Because testosterone levels remain higher for a longer period in men who had vasectomy, experts have theorized that such men have a greater chance for developing the cancer. While some studies have suggested a higher risk with vasectomy, other studies have reported no higher danger. A rigorous 2002 study from New Zealand, for example, which has the highest vasectomy rates in the world, found no increased risk of prostate cancer from the procedure, even 25 years after the operation. A 2002 study in California, in fact, reported a lower risk for prostate cancer in men who had had vasectomies. It is possible that the higher rates reported in earlier studies may have been due to earlier prostate screening in men who have had vasectomies. Indeed, one study reported that about 25% of doctors screened men with vasectomies earlier for prostate cancer than those without the operation. [See In-Depth Report #37: Vasectomy.]

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a vasectomy.

Click the icon to see an animation on vasectomy.

A Western lifestyle is associated with prostate cancer, so obesity, high-meat intake, and dietary fats have been intensively studied. Results have been inconsistent, however. Certain factors, such as cancer-causing compounds in well-cooked meat or high-calorie intake, may help explain the associations between such dietary factors and cancer risk.

Click the icon to see an image on different types of weight gain.

Fats. Some studies have found an association between high fat-intake and prostate cancer. This association may be explained by other suspected dietary factors for prostate cancer, such as high-calorie diet, high meat intake, and calcium (found in dairy products), all of which are associated with fat intake. The effects of specific fatty acids (compounds that make up fats) may also help clarify the role of fats in prostate cancer. The omega-3 fatty acids in fish (EPA and DHA) and the omega-3 fatty acids found in certain vegetables (ALA) can all protect the heart, but they may have different effects on the prostate.

Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acids. Research indicates that docosahexanoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaneoic acid (EPA), the omega-3 fatty acids found in fish, may be protective against prostate cancer. Some studies have reported a lower risk for prostate cancer in men who ate fish frequently (two or more times a week).
Alpha-Linolenic Acid. On the other hand, some research has indicated that alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), the omega-3 fatty acid found in certain plants and nuts (flaxseed, canola, walnuts), may increase the risk of prostate cancer. However, some studies suggest that flaxseed, a plant food that is also rich in omega-3 fatty acids, may help slow the growth of prostate tumors.

Meat and High-Temperature Cooking. Some evidence suggests that a high intake of red meat raises the risk for prostate cancer. Because red meat is high in saturated fat, such findings may explain the inconsistencies found in studies that simply look at fat content as a risk for prostate cancer. High-temperature cooking (grilling, broiling, or pan-frying) of meat or poultry has been specifically associated with increased risk for cancer in some studies. Over-cooking meat increases the amount of compounds called heterocyclic amines, which has been associated with cancerous changes in general and prostate cancer in particular, at least in some studies. Cooking meats in liquid does not appear to increase these compounds. As with all dietary studies, some have observed no association between high intake of well-cooked meat and prostate cancer.

Vegetarian Diet. Small studies suggest that a vegetarian diet may be protective. Specific foods may be especially helpful in reducing the risk of prostate cancer:

Whole grain cereals, seeds, and nuts have been associated with a lower risk for prostate cancer. Part of this protection may be due to their high fiber content. Fiber binds to sex steroids and is excreted, carrying the hormones with it. Whole grains also contain selenium, a trace mineral that may have some protective properties.
Many studies have reported a significantly lower risk for prostate cancer with high intake of cooked tomatoes, which are high in a beneficial plant chemical called lycopene. (However, other studies have not reported such protection.)
Soy may also be protective, which may partially explain the low rate of prostate cancer observed in Japanese men and vegetarians (who typically use soy as a protein replacement). Theoretically soy, which is a rich source of an estrogen-like plant compound, may inhibit hormones that promote prostate cancer. Laboratory studies are mixed on such effects, however.
Cruciferous vegetables (cauliflower and broccoli) may have cancer-fighting chemicals.
Boron-rich foods (nuts, red grapes, avocados, and dried fruits) may also be protective.
Green tea. Scientists have speculated that the antioxidants contained in green tea may help to inhibit prostate cancer growth. Investigators are researching the effects of both green tea and green tea extract supplements, but results to date have been inconclusive.

Dairy Products, Calcium, and Vitamin D. Studies have reported an association between consuming large amounts of dairy products and a modestly increased risk for prostate cancer. (Moderate intake has not been associated with a higher risk.) There is some evidence that calcium (contained in dairy products) may increase the risk for prostate cancer by reducing levels of the most active form of vitamin D (1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D). Many studies indicate that vitamin D may help protect against prostate cancer. Men should make sure they are getting enough vitamin D through sunlight exposure, food, or vitamin supplements.

Getting enough calcium to keep bones from thinning throughout a person's life may be made more difficult if that person has lactose intolerance or another reason, such as a tendency toward kidney stones, for avoiding calcium-rich food sources. Calcium deficiency also affects the heart and circulatory system, as well as the secretion of essential hormones. There are many ways to supplement calcium, including a growing number of fortified foods.

Click the icon to see an image of the benefits of vitamin D.

Click the icon to see an image of the sources of vitamin D.

There is some evidence that certain vitamin and mineral supplements (such as vitamin E and selenium) can protect against prostate cancer, and also some evidence that excessive use of supplements may increase risk. In a 2007 National Institutes of Health study, men who took multivitamin supplements more than seven times a week increased their risks for developing advanced prostate cancer and for dying from the disease. The risks were highest for men who had a family history of prostate cancer and for those who took individual supplements of selenium, beta-carotene, or zinc. However, using multivitamin supplements occasionally or once a day does not appear to increase prostate cancer risk.

The National Cancer Institute is conducting a large-scale clinical trial of more than 35,000 men to investigate whether selenium, vitamin E, or a combination of these two dietary supplements can help to prevent prostate cancer. The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) is the largest prostate cancer prevention trial ever initiated.

Click the icon to see an image of the benefits of vitamin E.

Click the icon to see an image of the sources of vitamin E.

In general, a healthy diet with nutritious fruits and vegetables is the best way to meet your daily requirement of vitamins and minerals.

Alcohol consumption does not appear to be associated with increased prostate cancer risk. A recent study, however, suggested a linear trend between red wine consumption and reduced risk of prostate cancer. In a study of over 1,400 newly diagnosed middle-aged patients with prostate cancer, researchers found that each additional glass of red wine consumed per week reduced the relative risk of prostate cancer by 6%. Researchers theorize that the flavonoids contained in red wine may inhibit tumor cell growth. More research is needed to confirm these results.

Regular physical activity may help reduce the risk of prostate cancer and slow the progression of the disease. The beneficial effects of exercise may be particularly important for older men. A 2006 study found that men ages 65 and older who exercised vigorously for at least 3 hours weekly had a 70% lower risk of being diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer.

Finasteride (Proscar) is a drug used to shrink the prostate in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It blocks an enzyme that converts testosterone to dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), the form of the male hormone that stimulates the prostate. Researchers are investigating whether finasteride may help prevent prostate cancer. In the 2003 Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), more than 18,000 men were randomly assigned to receive either finasteride or placebo. The men took the pills daily for 7 years. Results, published in 2003 in the New England Journal of Medicine, indicated that men who took finasteride were 25% less likely to develop prostate cancer than men who took placebo. However, although the finasteride group had fewer prostate cancers overall, those that did develop were higher-grade and more aggressive. Men who took finasteride had more sexual problems, including episodes of erectile dysfunction, but were less likely to have urinary problems, such as incontinence. It is still unclear if finasteride is an appropriate preventive approach.

Frequent ejaculations from masturbation or sexual activity have been associated with a lower risk for prostate cancer. Some experts speculate that certain carcinogens may be concentrated in prostate fluid, so that frequent ejaculation helps eliminate them. Of note, risky sexual activity, such as with multiple partners, increases the risk for sexually transmitted disease, which in turn may increase the risk for prostate cancer.

There is some evidence that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) offer some protection against prostate cancer. NSAIDs suppress chemicals in the body called COX-2, a protein that may cause prostate cancer cells to spread. Standard NSAIDs include aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil), and naproxen (Aleve). However, NSAIDs taken on a long-term basis can increase the risk for heart and gastrointestinal problems.

Symptoms

Prostate cancer usually causes no symptoms in the early stages. As the malignancy spreads, it may constrict the urethra and cause urinary problems.

Urine flows from the kidney through the ureters into the urinary bladder where it is temporarily stored. As the bladder becomes distended with urine, nerve impulses from the bladder signal the brain that it is full, giving the individual the urge to void. By voluntarily relaxing the sphincter muscle around the urethra, the bladder can be emptied of urine. Urine then flows out through the urethra.

Later-stage urinary symptoms typically include:

Weak urinary stream
Inability to urinate
Blood in the urine
Interruption of urinary stream (stopping and starting)
Frequent urination (especially at night)
Pain or burning during urination

Significant pain in one or more bones may indicate the occurrence of metastases (spread of disease). This chronic pain occurs most often in the spine and sometimes flares in the pelvis, the lower back, the hips, or the bones of the upper legs. It may be accompanied by significant weight loss.

Conditions with Similar Symptoms

In up to half of men in their 40s, the prostate begins to enlarge through a process of cell multiplication called benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The symptoms of BPH can mirror late-stage prostate cancer because the enlarging inner portion of the prostate puts pressure on the urethra, which can potentially cause urinary problems. About 80% of men eventually develop enlarged prostates, but only some experience significant symptoms. BPH is a normal condition and is not life-threatening. [See In-Depth Report #71: Benign prostatic hyperplasia.]

Benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is a non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland, commonly found in men over the age of 50.

Relationship to Prostate Cancer. Because the prostate enlargement in BPH is affected by testosterone, many men are concerned that it may be related to prostate cancer. Fortunately, current evidence indicates that it has no effect one way or the other. The two conditions develop in different parts of the prostate. BPH occurs in the inner zone of the prostate, while cancer tends to develop in the outer area. A 10-year study found no higher risk for prostate cancer in men with BPH.

Click the icon to see an animation about benign prostatic hypertrophy.

Prostatitis is an inflammation of the prostate, often caused by bacterial infections. Symptoms include urgency, frequency, and pain in urination, sometimes accompanied by fever or blood in the urine.

Screening and Diagnosis

The prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test is widely used for screening men for prostate cancer. However, there is great uncertainty over whether regular screening has major benefits for most men. The most recent guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force report that there is no conclusive evidence that routine prostate screening saves lives. Indeed, it may lead to invasive testing, and to treatments for many men who, considering the slow growth of the cancer, might derive no benefits from them. It is a difficult subject, and men must discuss all aspects carefully with their doctor.

A 2006 study in the Archives of Internal Medicine also suggested that screening tests for prostate cancer may not reduce men’s risk of death. The small study of 1,000 men found no differences in survival between men who had prostate specific antigen tests or digital rectal exams, and men who were not screened. Doctors should inform men of the uncertainty of prostate cancer tests so that patients understand the relative risks and benefits of screening

Standard Screening Tests for Early Detection. Two standard tests are used for early detection of prostate cancer:

Digital rectal examination (DRE). With the DRE, a doctor palpates the prostate in order to feel lumps or masses.
PSA test. The PSA blood test measures the level of a protein called prostate-specific antigen. It is able to detect early prostate cancer, although it has limitations.

If the digital rectal examination indicates the possible presence of cancer, regardless of the PSA results, a doctor may also obtain a visual image of the prostate through an ultrasound procedure called transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Only a biopsy, however, in which a tiny sample of prostate tissue is surgically removed, can actually confirm a diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Candidates for Annual Screening. Until major studies report on the survival benefits of prostate screening, expert groups recommend the following:

Men ages 50 - 70 should be offered annual screening. (Some experts believe that men whose PSA levels are under 1.0 and possibly under 2.0 may safely be screened only every 2 years thereafter.)
Men with a family history of prostate cancer and all African-American men should consider annual screening at about age 45.
Experts agree that PSA testing is inappropriate for men over age 70. PSA testing in this age group can cause more harm than good by leading to overly aggressive treatment. Despite this fact, many elderly men continue to receive unnecessary PSA tests.

The best age to start annual screening is under debate. Some experts advocate performing a first PSA test in all men aged 40 and then monitoring anyone whose PSA levels are over 0.60 ng/mL. They argue that such men are at high risk for developing prostate cancer within 25 years. A study presented at the 2007 meeting of the American Urological Association suggested that even a small increase in PSA in men age 44 - 50 may predict whether advanced prostate cancer will develop later in life.

Researchers are working on developing more accurate tests that, hopefully, will one day replace the PSA test. A promising test in development measures a protein called early prostate cancer antigen-2 (EPCA-2). A 2007 study suggested that the EPCA-2 test is highly accurate. It can distinguish between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer and can evaluate whether or not a man has prostate cancer, regardless of what his PSA levels indicate. Researchers hope that this test may eventually provide better diagnoses of prostate cancer, and help prevent men from receiving unnecessary biopsies.


	DRE alone	PSA alone and in Combination with DRE
Chance of Cancer	Only 20% of men with abnormal DREs have cancer. Unfortunately, 70% of prostate cancers detected with DRE alone have already spread beyond the prostate gland.	The odds of cancer with PSA readings are: 3 ng/mL or below indicates 2% or less chance of cancer. 3 - 10 ng/mL indicates about a 25% chance of cancer. 10 ng/mL and over indicates a very strong chance. Men with abnormal results from both DRE plus PSA tests have a 60% chance for cancer.
Risk of Missed Cancers with Normal Results	About 60% of men who have prostate cancer have normal DRE results.	Some evidence suggests that only performing biopsies at levels above 4.0 would miss over 80% of cancers present below that level in men under 60 years and 65% in older men. As a result, some experts recommend biopsies with PSA levels at 3.0 or below in young men. Still, cancer at low PSA levels is very uncommon, particularly in younger men.

About 90% of all prostate cancers arise in the outer part of the prostate where they may be detected by a digital rectal exam (DRE), which is the simplest and most widely-performed screening procedure. The doctor inserts a gloved and lubricated finger into the patient's rectum and feels the prostate for bumps or other abnormalities. The exam is quick and painless but some men find it embarrassing. It is not very accurate in detecting early cancers, but studies indicate that regular DREs still save lives.

Prostate Cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United States. Prostate cancer forms in the prostate gland, and can sometimes be felt on digital rectal examination. This is one of the purposes of the digital rectal exam.

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a protein produced in the prostate gland that keeps semen in liquid form. Prostate cancer cells appear to produce this protein in elevated quantities. Measuring PSA levels increases the chance for detecting the presence of cancer when it is microscopic. There are many unresolved questions surrounding PSA testing. The test is not accurate enough to either completely rule out or confirm the presence of cancer. Relying too much on the test may lead to unnecessary biopsies. Not relying on it enough may miss cancers. It is still unclear if PSA testing is actually saving lives.

Click the icon to see an image of a PSA blood test.

Indications for Biopsy. A biopsy is usually performed to confirm or rule out cancer after screening tests that report:

PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or higher. Some evidence indicates that men with an initial test showing PSA levels above 4.0 should take a second PSA test several weeks afterward before having a biopsy, since many non-malignant factors can increase PSA levels. (Some experts urge biopsies even if PSA levels fall below 4.0 mg, particularly in men under 60, since lower levels do not necessarily rule out cancer.)
Abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE).

Men with abnormal results from both tests have a 60% chance of prostate cancer. The chances for cancer if only one test is abnormal are considerably lower. To further complicate matters, biopsies themselves may miss very small cancers detected by PSA levels alone.

Factors Affecting PSA Levels. A number of factors and noncancerous conditions can influence PSA levels:

Ethnicity. Normal levels in Caucasian males may be different from those for African-American or Asian men. For example, using PSA screening, one study suggested that 15% of Caucasians and 37% of African-Americans are overdiagnosed with prostate cancer based upon PSA results. Some experts believe that there should be different scales for determining risk among these groups, but there is still not enough information to determine a specific range for various ethnic groups.
Age. PSA levels tend to rise naturally with age, so an elevated level in a man who is 70 may be less serious than the same level in a younger man. Some experts believe that men older than 65 who have low PSA levels are at such low risk for prostate cancer that they may be able to forgo further testing.
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Its Treatments. Between 25 - 56% of patients with BPH have elevated PSA levels. Certain treatments for this condition can also elevate PSA.
Prostatitis. About half of men with elevated PSA levels but no signs of cancer on biopsy have signs of prostatitis as indicated by urine and prostate secretion tests. (Prostatitis simply means inflammation in the prostate. Inflammation is usually due to bacterial infection, but it can also be caused by nonbacterial factors.) In one study, screening for prostatitis increased the accuracy of the PSA test significantly and reduced the number of unnecessary biopsies.
Other Noncancerous Conditions. Other noncancerous conditions that can increase PSA levels include surgical procedures or drug treatments for BPH, acute urinary retention, digital rectal examinations, and prostate biopsies themselves.
Ejaculation. Ejaculation within 48 hours before testing can raise PSA levels.

Even with its limitation, the PSA test has increased the number of detectable early-stage and therefore treatable cancers. Because of the slow-growing nature of prostate cancer, however, it is not known whether all of these very early cancers will result in significant or life-threatening disease. It is possible that PSA screening could result in the detection of some possible cancers that would never have bothered the patient and would never have posed a threat to his life.

To improve the accuracy of the PSA tests, particularly when PSA levels have risen to an intermediate range of between 4 - 10 ng/mL, researchers are developing methods for measuring other factors. To date, no test has emerged as clearly superior to the PSA test.

Free PSA Test. A small amount of prostate specific antigen leaks out of the prostate into the bloodstream. There, PSA can circulate without binding to other proteins and is referred to as free PSA. It can also form chemical combinations with other proteins. If cancer is present, PSA is more likely to be bound, and so there is less free PSA in circulation. The free PSA blood test, then, is a ratio of free PSA to the total PSA (free PSA plus chemically bound PSA).

The following results are used to determine if an elevated PSA level could mean cancer:

A free-to-total PSA ratio of 20% or lower, plus total PSA levels of 4 - 10 ng/mL, are suggestive of prostate cancer. (Some experts use 25% as a cut-off, but studies suggest that using this cut-off would miss cancers in many African-American and older men.)
A free-to-total PSA level of more than 20% plus normal or even moderately elevated total PSA tend to indicate the presence of other, benign conditions, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (but it still does not rule out cancer).

Some studies have reported that adding a test for free PSA may improve prostate cancer detection by roughly 40% and may also reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies. In addition, any cancers that the test misses would not develop into significant disease for many years, providing ample opportunity to identify them before they became serious. Not all studies support its advantages, however, compared to measuring total PSA alone, and to date there is no consensus among doctors for how it can be used.

Complexed PSA Test. Complexed PSA (cPSA) is a form of circulating PSA that is bound to a molecule called alpha1-antichymotrypsin. It represents about 90% of the total PSA in men and is significantly higher in men with prostate cancer than in those with BPH. To date, studies have reported conflicting results on its benefits for diagnosing prostate cancer.

Transition Zone PSA Test. Some tests have been developed to measure the density of the PSA in the transition zone of the prostate gland. (The transition zone is the central area of the prostate that wraps around the urethra.) A major comparison study in 2002 reported more accurate results than with complexed PSA.

An ultrasound procedure called transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) provides a visual image of the prostate and is used if the DRE indicates the presence of cancer. Ultrasound is not effective as a diagnostic tool by itself because it cannot differentiate very well between benign inflammations and cancer, but the procedure may help to confirm an uncertain preliminary diagnosis and is useful as a guide for needle biopsies. Ultrasound enhancements, such as Doppler imaging or computer modeling techniques called artificial neural networks (ANN), may increase the accuracy of TRUS.

Initial Biopsies. If preliminary tests raise the suspicion of cancer, doctors will perform a biopsy. Biopsy is used to diagnose prostate cancer, and is a very accurate method for predicting the severity of an existing cancer. However, biopsies can still miss cancers if they are very small.

Core Biopsy. The standard method is called a core biopsy, which uses a spring-loaded biopsy device inserted into the rectum. The device propels a needle into the prostate, obtaining a core of tissue, which is examined by pathologists.
Fine Needle Aspiration. A more recent procedure, called fine needle aspiration, is less painful and may be as accurate as a core biopsy if the sample obtained is sufficient for analysis and if it is analyzed by a skilled pathologist.

More than half of the men who have a biopsy experience discomfort and anxiety, with men under 60 reporting higher levels of discomfort than older men. Taking a sedative 1 - 2 hours before the procedure can help reduce distress. Complications of biopsy are low, but urinary tract infection, fever, or bleeding occurs in 0.1 - 4% of men.

Repeat Biopsies. Because a biopsy can miss very small cancer cells, sometimes three or even more biopsies are recommended if cancer is still suspected after negative results, such as when:

PSA levels are high. Two or more biopsies may be taken if a man has very high PSA levels and still has normal results on a biopsy. Even men with mildly elevated PSA (between 4 - 10 ng/mL) who test negative may be given a repeat biopsy. Cancer will be detected in about 10% of this group. Whether a third biopsy is useful in these men if they still test negative after a second biopsy is uncertain.
DRE results are abnormal.
Ultrasound results are abnormal.
The initial biopsy yields microscopic findings that are suspicious.
The initial biopsy detects precancerous cells known as high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). No treatment is necessary with this finding, but these patients should be rechecked every 3 - 6 months for the next 2 years, and then annually.

Doctors may also perform a lymph node biopsy to see if the cancer has spread.

Tests to Determine Severity of Cancer

Once cancer is diagnosed, PSA levels may help to determine its extent. If PSA levels are less than 20 ng/mL, it is possible that the cancer has not spread to distant sites. PSA levels over 40 ng/mL are a strong indicator that cancer has metastasized (spread throughout the body). PSA levels are also monitored after treatments begin. Changes in the level can show if a treatment is working or if the cancer has come back.

Doctors also monitor how quickly PSA levels rise over time. This rate is called PSA velocity (PSAV). The PSAV is very helpful in determining when treatment should begin and which treatment should be used. A high rate of PSAV is considered to be 2 ng/mL a year. Recent research suggests that men with early-stage prostate cancer who have a slow PSAV are more likely to live longer than men with rapidly rising PSA levels.

A number of biological factors are being used or investigated as markers for cancer or its severity:

Chromosomal Sets. The number of chromosomal sets in the nucleus of the tumor's DNA, known as its ploidy, is an important marker for patients in late stages of prostate cancer. Tumors with the normal two sets of chromosomes, called diploid tumors, usually have a more favorable outcome than tumors that have four sets of chromosomes (tetraploid tumors) or have an abnormal number of individual chromosomes (aneuploid tumors).

Blood Vessel Density. The density of blood vessels in the tumor is an important indicator of outcome. The greater the density, the more likely the tumor is to be aggressive.

Serum Acid Phosphatase. High levels of this enzyme indicate a more aggressive disease and the need for intensive treatments.

Testosterone Levels. Higher total testosterone levels may increase the risk for metastasis. A 2000 study found an association with low free testosterone and more extensive prostate cancer, suggesting free testosterone could be a marker for aggressive disease. (Free testosterone, as with free PSA, is not chemically bound.)

Genetic Markers. Researchers have identified a genetic marker (EZH2), which may prove to be an important marker for aggressive prostate cancer. It may, in fact, prove to be a better predictor of outcome than the tumor grade, stage, or surgical margins. Other genes being studied are those that regulate tumor growth (p53, p27, bcl-2).

Other Markers. Other markers being investigated for predicting cancer progression include prostate-specific membrane antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase, and growth factors.

The ProstaScint is a scanning technique that uses tiny amounts of radioactive material with a monoclonal antibody that can attach specifically to prostate cancer cells. A special camera then can detect tumor cells that cannot be detected with other diagnostic tools. It may help doctors make better treatment decisions. The role of this test in the routine management of prostate cancer is still being defined.

If the biopsy indicates cancer, the doctor will order other tests to determine whether or how far the cancer has spread.

Bone Scans and X-Rays. Bone scans and x-rays may reveal whether the cancer has invaded the bones. To perform a bone scan, doctors inject low doses of a radioactive substance into the patient's vein, which accumulates in bones that have been damaged by cancer. A scanner then reveals how much of the radioactive material has accumulated. Arthritis and infections may also produce positive scans. Patients with PSA levels below 20 ng/mL are unlikely to have scans that show cancer in the bone.

A radiotracer is injected into a peripheral vein. As the radiotracer decays, gamma radiation is emitted and is detected by a Gamma camera. When the tracer has collected in the target organ the area is scanned. Radionuclide scans can detect abnormalities such as fractures, bone infections, arthritis, rickets, and tumors that have spread, among other diseases.

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can further pinpoint the location of cancer that has spread beyond the prostate. Advanced MRI techniques are showing promise for staging and planning treatments.

Click the icon to see an image of a CT scan.

Click the icon to see an image of a MRI.

Bone Metastasis Markers. Researchers are investigating chemical markers, such as amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP), as early indicators of bone metastasis.

Treatment

Because BPH rarely causes serious complications, men usually have a choice between treating it or opting for watchful waiting:

Watchful Waiting. Watchful waiting (also called active surveillance) involves lifestyle changes and an annual examination. Even when choosing watchful waiting, an initial examination is critical to rule out other disorders.
Treatment Options. The primary goals of treatment for BPH are to improve urinary flow and to reduce symptoms. Many options are available. They include drug therapies, minimally invasive procedures, and major surgery.

The choice between watchful waiting and treatment usually depends on a number of factors, such as urine flow rates, prostate size, and PSA levels. Men with BPH who develop symptoms at around age 50 are more likely to need treatment within their lifetimes than older men. Unfortunately, there is no current way to determine who specifically might be at risk for serious problems and need early treatment.

The development of the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) has made the evaluation of symptoms somewhat easier. This scoring service serves as a benchmark for determining severity. The decision to treat or not to treat is typically based on the guidelines described below, but the ultimate choice is often guided primarily by a man's perception of his own symptoms.

Mild, or No, Symptoms. Men with mild, or no, symptoms (IPSS scores of 7 or below) usually choose watchful waiting even if their prostates are enlarged. BPH eventually progresses to the point of needing treatment in about 15% of men with mild symptoms who wait.

Moderate Symptoms. The choice is most difficult for men with moderate symptoms (scores between 8 - 19) and may simply depend on a man's ability to tolerate them. Some studies have reported that up to 40% of men with moderate symptoms eventually seek treatment, and a quarter require surgery. In a small percentage of patients, symptoms improve.

Severe Symptoms. Men with severe symptoms (scores over 20) nearly always choose treatment, although if their prostate glands are small or normal-sized, symptoms may improve.

If a man opts for treatment, there are several choices. Most experts recommend a staged approach as follows:

Mild Symptoms. Medications are the best choice for men with mild symptoms who decide to have their condition treated. There are two standard choices: alpha-blockers and anti-androgens, nearly always finasteride (Proscar). Specific conditions determine the choice, although most men take an alpha-blocker. Men with mild symptoms who choose surgery only experience minor improvement afterward but face the same risks as patients with more severe symptoms.
Moderate-to-Severe Symptoms. Men with moderate-to-severe symptoms often respond to the same medications as men with mild symptoms. (Combinations of alpha-blockers and finasteride are under investigation.) Recent developments in drug therapy have reduced the number of surgical procedures needed and delayed their use. However, a quarter of men with moderate symptoms, and even more men with severe symptoms, eventually need surgery. If a man chooses surgery, there are many choices. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard procedure, but less invasive procedures, particularly those using heat or lasers to destroy prostate tissue, are gaining prominence.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing transurethral resection of the prostate surgery.

The most common reason for choosing surgery is obstruction of the bladder outlet, which causes urinary retention. Surgery is also typically a reasonable option when BPH is clearly related to one or more of the following conditions:

Recurrent urinary tract infection.
Hematuria (blood in the urine). Studies have suggested that when hematuria is left untreated, two-thirds of patients continue to bleed and one third require surgery. The drug finasteride may help some men with this condition and should probably be tried before surgery.
Bladder stones.
Kidney problems.
Some experts believe that surgery might benefit patients for whom an early diagnosis of prostate cancer is important. Unsuspected prostate cancer is detected during surgery in about 15% of cases.

The greatest improvements resulting from surgery are usually increased urinary flow and reduced urine retention. In one study, men who chose surgery reported more worry and depression before the procedure, but afterward they had less depression and anxiety than those who had chosen medication. Often, however, the benefits of surgery are not permanent.

Treatment Options by Staging and Grading

Stages indicate the extent of the cancer:

Stage I and stage II cancer are considered early stage. The cancer is localized and has not spread outside the prostate gland.
Stage III, locally advanced cancer, means that the cancer has spread into the seminal vesicles (glands at the base of the bladder, which are connected to the prostate gland and help produce semen).
Stage IV is advanced cancer. The cancer has spread to the lymph nodes and other tissues or organs.

Experts have devised treatments based on classification systems, including staging and tumor grade. However, there are no clear-cut answers on the best treatments for particular stages. In addition to staging, other factors must be considered. These factors include the patient’s age, overall health status, and personal preferences concerning side effects and quality of life. In addition to standard treatments, patients may also wish to consider enrolling in clinical trials of investigational treatments.

The U.S. National Cancer Institute recommends the following treatment options by cancer stage:

Tumors: T1a, N0, M0, G1, Stage A

Active surveillance
Radical prostatectomy, usually with pelvic lymphadenectomy, with or without radiation therapy after surgery
External beam radiation therapy
Implant radiation therapy (brachytherapy)
Clinical trial options include high-intensity focused ultrasound

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing prostatectomy surgery.

Tumors: T1a - c, N0, M0, any G, Stage A2, B1, or B2

Radical prostatectomy, usually with pelvic lymphadenectomy, with or without radiation therapy after surgery
Active surveillance
External beam radiation therapy with or without hormone therapy
Implant radiation therapy (brachytherapy)
Clinical trial options include radiation therapy with or without hormone therapy; ultrasound-guided cryosurgery; hormone therapy followed by radical prostatectomy

Tumors: T3, N0, M0, any G, Stage C

External beam radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy (hormone therapy)
Androgen deprivation therapy
Radical prostatectomy, usually with pelvic lymphadenectomy, with or without radiation therapy following surgery
Radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to relieve symptoms
Clinical trial options include ultrasound-guided cryosurgery

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing transurethral resection of the prostate.

Tumors: Any T, any N, any M, any G, Stage D1 - D2

Androgen deprivation therapy
External beam radiation therapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy
Radiation therapy or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to relieve symptoms
Active surveillance
Clinical trial options include radical prostatectomy with surgery to remove both testicles (orchiectomy)

Treatment options are dependent on various factors, including prior treatment, site of recurrence, coexistent illnesses, and individual patient considerations.

Patients whose cancer recurs locally after prostatectomy: Radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy.
Patients whose cancer recurs locally after radiation therapy: Androgen deprivation therapy, prostatectomy (very select patients).
Patients whose recurrent cancer has spread: See treatment options for stage IV.

Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer

Choosing the best treatment for localized prostate cancer (T1 or T2) is generally based on the patient's age, the stage and grade of the cancer, overall health status, and the patient's personal preferences for the risks and benefits of each therapy.

Patients have three main options:

Active surveillance, also called watchful waiting, involves monitoring the tumor for cancer progression to determine if and when treatment should be started.
Surgery (radical prostatectomy) removes the prostate gland. The vessels that carry semen and surrounding tissue may also be removed. Studies indicate that compared to watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy may lower the risk of cancer recurrence and death, particularly for younger men with aggressive tumors.
Radiation therapy targets the tumor either externally (external beam radiation) or internally (implanted “seeds”).

In 2007, the American Urological Association (AUA) released guidelines for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The guidelines recommend that patients should be classified as low, intermediate, or high risk. Doctors determine the risk category by using criteria such as PSA tests, tumor aggressiveness, and the clinical stage of the tumor.

Among the AUA’s treatment recommendations:

Compared with active surveillance, radical prostatectomy may lower the risk of cancer recurrence and death.
For men at intermediate and high risk, adding androgen deprivation therapy to external beam radiation may improve survival. A higher dose of external beam radiation also improves the odds for survival.
Initial (first-line) androgen deprivation therapy is seldom recommended for localized prostate cancer except for the relief of symptoms in patients with poor prognoses. Androgen deprivation therapy can increase the risks for diabetes and heart disease.
Patients with localized prostate cancer should have the opportunity to enroll in clinical trials investigating new types of therapy.

Conflicting Data on Survival Rates. To date, neither treatment nor active surveillance has emerged with a definitive survival advantage. Several studies from 2005 and 2006 suggested that treatment provides a survival advantage over watchful waiting for some men with early-stage prostate cancer. A 2005 New England Journal of Medicine study reported that men who had a radical prostatectomy before age 65 had a reduced risk of death from prostate cancer, death from other causes, localized cancer progression, and metastases than men who chose watchful waiting.

Similarly, research presented at the 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium found in a study of nearly 50,000 men with early-stage prostate cancer that men who had radiation or surgical treatment had a 30% lower risk of death than men who were randomly assigned to watchful waiting. However, a 2005 Journal of the American Medical Association study advised against aggressive treatment for localized low-grade prostate cancer. The study found that men with low-grade prostate cancer had a small risk of cancer progression even after 20 years of watchful waiting or hormonal drug therapy

Imperfection of Classification System. The classification systems are not perfect. Even if tumors are rated in low stages and grades and are treated accordingly, undetected cancer cells may escape and spread beyond the prostate. Other factors, such as the man's age and medical condition, must be included in determining whether aggressive treatments or conservative measures are appropriate.

Specialty Bias. Patients should be aware that doctors may be biased to prefer a specific treatment depending on their specialty. For example, in one study the following treatments were favored for patients who were generally appropriate candidates for either surgery, radiation, or watchful waiting:

93% of urologists recommended radical prostatectomy.
72% of radiation oncologists recommended radiation. (And 82% thought that radical prostatectomy was overused.)
Virtually none of the doctors recommended watchful waiting for higher-risk disease. When in doubt, patients should always seek a second opinion to help them make this important choice.

Quality of Life. Surgery and radiation both have potentially distressing side effects, including the possibility of impotence, incontinence, or both. A man must weigh his own emotional responses to the possibility of these side effects versus the possible stress of watchful waiting.

In general, differences in quality of life after surgery or radiation treatment have to do with the specific effects of each type of treatment:

Radiotherapy generally causes more bowel problems than surgery, 30 - 35% versus 6 - 7%, according to a 2001 study. In a 2003 review, the risk for impotence from radiotherapy varied from 25% with brachytherapy to 45% with external beam radiotherapy.
Prostatectomy causes more urinary incontinence (39 - 49% versus 6 - 7% for radiotherapy patients) than radiotherapy. Risks for impotence range from 66% after nerve-sparing prostatectomy to 87% after cryotherapy. In spite of these adverse effects, a 2002 study reported no meaningful differences in well-being or quality of life during a 4-year period for men who chose surgery versus those who chose watchful waiting.
Active surveillance could lead to cancer growth that eventually obstructs the urinary tract (which can happen with the treatments as well). It may also impose an emotional burden on men who live with the possibility of progressive cancer and its difficult treatments. Some who decide to wait become what some doctors refer to as the "walking worried," men who are constantly concerned with their PSA levels. Because aggressive treatment reduces such anxiety, some studies reported that years after surgery, about 75% of men said they would chose it again, in spite of the significant side effects.

Watchful waiting involves lifestyle change and careful monitoring for cancer progression. Over the last several years, watchful waiting has evolved into a strategy called “active surveillance” or “delayed surgical intervention.” With this approach, patients have a digital rectal exam and PSA blood test every 6 - 12 months. If test results indicate cancer progression, then treatment options (surgery, radiation, drugs) are considered. Patients should exercise and eat healthy foods. Patients should report symptoms such as weight loss, pain, urinary problems, fatigue, or impotence to their doctors.

Candidates. Active surveillance may be most appropriate for the following patients:

Men in their late 70s and older. More aggressive therapies (surgery and radiation) are usually recommended for men in their 50s and younger. The choice for men in their 60s and early 70s is more problematic. The general recommendation is that aggressive therapy is suitable for those who have a life expectancy of more than 10 years and who have localized but mid- to high-grade tumors. The tumor grade may be the best guide for determining the risks in choosing watchful waiting.
Elderly men with early-stage (T0 - T2) low-grade tumors.
Men with low-to-moderate (3 - 13 ng/mL) PSA levels.

Some experts think that because prostate cancer grows so slowly, it is likely that older men will die from causes unrelated to the cancer. There is therefore little potential benefit from surgery or radiation, with both posing a risk for impotence and incontinence. However, some recent surveys suggest that more men are choosing treatment (especially surgery) over active surveillance. The choice is a difficult one. It is important that patients find a doctor who can provide them with all the necessary information so that they can make an informed decision.

In men whose cancer is confined to the prostate, surgical resection (radical prostatectomy) offers the potential for cure. Cure rates from initial surgery in men with localized cancer are about 70%, depending on tumor stage, tumor grade, and PSA levels. Research suggests that surgery provides long-term cancer control. Most patients can consider themselves disease-free if their PSA levels remain undetectable 10 years after surgery.

Candidates. Radical prostatectomy is a consideration for men who meet all of the following criteria:

In good health and with a life expectancy of 10 years or more. As average life expectancy in men has increased, more older men are becoming candidates for surgery. Complication rates are higher the older a man is, however.
The cancer has not spread beyond the prostate gland.
The cancer is potentially life threatening. (In general, a life-threatening tumor is indicated by volumes more than 0.2 cc and Gleason grade scores greater than 5.)

The procedure is more likely to cause incontinence (up to 50%) than radiation treatment but has fewer bowel complications. Impotence rates are about the same. Surgery for prostate cancer may be particularly difficult in men who have had transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Radiation therapy (or radiotherapy) is administered as external beam radiation or as brachytherapy (radiation implants). It may be used as the sole primary treatment for localized prostate cancer; 5-year survival rates are similar to those of surgery.

Candidates. Radiation is considered for men with one or more of the following characteristics:

Being older and, particularly, having other medical problems.
Cancer has extended beyond the prostate capsule but has not spread to the lymph nodes or further.
Being a good surgical candidate, but having decided against an operation.

The risk for incontinence (less than 10%) is much lower than with surgery, although bowel problems occur in about a third of patients. Impotence rates are about the same.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Radiation. Hormonal (“androgen deprivation”) drugs combined with radiation therapy may improve survival rates in moderate- or high-risk groups. Patients may need to take these drugs long-term to improve outcomes. Hormonal drugs before radiation (neoadjuvant therapy) may be helpful in shrinking enlarged glands so that brachytherapy (radiation implants) can be used. Hormone therapy can also be given at the same time or following radiation.

An important study published in 2004 in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that for men with localized prostate cancer, a 6-month course of androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiation treatments produced greater survival rates than radiation treatment alone. Standard medical practice has generally indicated that hormone therapy should be given for 3 years; the JAMA study suggests that a shorter regimen may be equally beneficial for some patients and may help reduce the side effects that typically accompany androgen-suppressing drugs.

A 2005 JAMA study suggested that PSA velocity (PSAV) may help doctors decide which patients should receive androgen deprivation drugs along with radiation therapy. PSAV lets doctors calculate how quickly a patient’s PSA level has risen. Researchers found that men who had at least a 2.0 ng/mL increase in PSA levels during the year before their cancer diagnosis had a high risk of dying after external beam radiation therapy, even though they had low-grade prostate cancer. The study suggests that men with this particular PSAV history should consider combining radiation therapy with androgen deprivation drugs.

Surgery

Radical prostatectomy is the surgical removal of the entire prostate gland along with the seminal vesicles (the vessels that carry semen) and surrounding tissue. The incision can be made in one of the following regions:

Retropubicly (through the abdomen and under the pubic bone, exposing the entire surface of the prostate).
Through the perineum (the skin between the scrotum and the anus).

The gland and other structures are then removed. The operation lasts 2 - 4 hours. Advanced surgical techniques, such as minilaparotomy and laparoscopy, are being developed for radical prostatectomy. These techniques use smaller incisions, are less invasive, and may cause fewer complications.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing prostatectomy surgery.

Nerve-Sparing Techniques. Surgical procedures have been refined over the years, and many operations for localized low-grade prostate cancer now spare the nerves that control erection.

A bilateral nerve-sparing procedure saves the nerves on both sides of the sex organs.
A unilateral procedure saves nerves on only one side.

Nerve-sparing techniques can improve quality of life. The ability for sexual intercourse recovers in about a third of patients at 3 years and nearly 60% at 5 years after surgery. (Rates vary depending on certain factors, such as the patient's age -- the younger the better.) In cases where the tumor is bulky and undifferentiated, nerve-sparing techniques may not be appropriate.

Convalescence. Patients remain hospitalized for up to 2 weeks. A temporary catheter used to pass urine is kept in place when the patient is sent home and usually removed about 3 weeks after the operation. The convalescent period at home is about a month. In general, younger patients with early-stage cancers recover fastest and experience the fewest side effects.

Complication rates vary after radical prostatectomy and usually depend on the age of the patient and the experience of the surgeon and medical center. They can range from 4% in men in their 40s to 14% in men over age 70. Complication rates are 10 times higher in patients who have prostatectomy because of cancer recurrence after radiation treatment.

Complications include the usual risks of any surgery, such as blood clots, heart problems, infection, and bleeding. Complications specific to radical prostatectomy, (incontinence, impotence, and contracture of the bladder neck), are discussed below. The mortality rate is very low, about 0.4%.

Quality of life usually improves shortly after surgery, and recovery from certain complications, such as incontinence and sexual function, can continue to occur even over years.

Urinary Incontinence. Urinary incontinence is a common complication and a more distressing side effect of surgery for most men than sexual dysfunction. When the urinary catheter is first removed following surgery, nearly all patients lack control of urinary function and will leak urine for at least a few days and sometimes for months. Major medical centers report that continence returns within about 18 months for nearly all men younger than age 70 and in the great majority of men older than 70. The average time for return of continence in one center was just 1.5 months.

Click the icon to see an image of catheterization.

A number of approaches may help prevent or treat incontinence:

Nerve-sparing techniques can help prevent incontinence, although even in experienced centers, 8% of patients will have some postoperative incontinence, and this rate is much higher (up to 50%) in many community medical centers.
A procedure called endopelvic anterior urethral stitch (EAUS) used with prostatectomy appears to reduce urinary incontinence. In one small study, 75% of selected patients recovered continence in a month. The procedure requires a simple stitch at the front of the urethra.
Kegel exercises, contracting and relaxing the muscles used to shut off the urinary stream, strengthen the muscles on the pelvic floor and are reported to be very beneficial for many men.

If incontinence persists beyond a year, patients may require drug therapy or surgery. Collagen injections into the urethra, bladder neck suspension surgery, or a urinary sphincter implant may be helpful for men who have chronic incontinence. [See In-Depth Report #50: Urinary incontinence.]

Impotence. Studies suggest that about 40% of men have problems with erection after the procedure. In one study, however, more than 70% said they would have the procedure again. Nerve-sparing procedures are proving to be helpful in reducing impotence as well as incontinence.

Sildenafil (Viagra) may help restore potency on average in about a third of patients, but some men may do better than others. In one study, for example, 80% of younger men who were potent before surgery and had bilateral nerve sparing procedures responded to the drug. (Only 40% responded with only unilateral procedure.) Sildenafil is unlikely to be effective for men who had unilateral or no nerve sparing procedures. In those who respond, sildenafil may provide a benefit for years. Sildenafil may take 9 months or longer to become effective. Men who take it may benefit from alprostadil injections started right after surgery to preserve elasticity and help prevent scarring.

Early treatments with alprostadil injections may helpful in restoring erectile function in any case. This treatment maintains blood flow in the penis, and some research suggests that impotence after prostate surgery may be due in part to injury to these blood vessels. In one study, men administered injections every other night for 6 months. They then started taking sildenafil 3 months after surgery. At 6 months, 82% of these men achieved penetration compared to only 52% of men who took Viagra only. The vacuum pump may serve a similar purpose as the injections. [See In-Depth Report #15: Erectile dysfunction.]

Even when erectile function is preserved, men may experience other sexual problems:

Erections may not be as rigid as before the operation.
Orgasm and sexual sensation may be altered.
Patients who retain potency may suffer from retrograde ejaculation, also known as dry ejaculation. During ejaculation, semen travels backward into the bladder, causing infertility.

Fecal Incontinence. Radical prostatectomy can also cause fecal incontinence. The risk may actually be higher in men undergoing nerve-sparing procedures.

Contracture of the Bladder Neck. Another common postsurgical complication is contracture of the bladder neck at the point where it has been stitched to the remainder of the urethra. Contracture usually occurs within the first 3 months after the operation, causing a sharp decrease in urinary stream. The condition can be treated by dilation or surgery on the bladder neck, and rarely recurs.

Pelvic lymphadenectomy is the surgical removal of the pelvic lymph nodes. It is usually performed at the same time as prostatectomy. If the surgeon suspects that cancer has spread beyond the prostate, the surgeon will perform the lymphadenectomy as part of the operation. Some surgeons do this procedure as a matter of course when performing prostatectomy, since it has few complications and adds information on the state of the disease. The lymph nodes are removed through an incision in the lower part of the abdomen, using conventional surgery or laparoscopy, a less invasive variation. The nodes are immediately examined. If they show signs of cancer, metastasis has occurred. In such cases, the operation is usually stopped and the patient is offered radiation or hormone treatments.

Click the icon to see an image of the pelvic lymph nodes.

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) involves removing a section of the prostate with a surgical instrument (resectoscope) that is inserted through the urethra. TURP may be used to control urinary symptoms in men who are not good candidates for curative therapy due to advanced age, health status, or other reasons. TURP is also used as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Cryosurgery is an alternative to standard prostatectomy. The goal of cryosurgery is destruction of the entire prostate gland and possibly surrounding tissue. Steel probes are inserted through the skin between the anus and the rectum and into the prostate. Liquid nitrogen is pumped through the probes to freeze all prostate cells, both healthy and cancerous. For success, cryosurgery requires a uniformly frozen area. The dead cells are absorbed and eliminated by the body. Patients can leave the hospital in 2 - 3 days.

Candidates. Cryosurgery may be considered for patients with:

Early stage local cancer
Cancer that has recurred after radiation treatments
Large primary tumors that the surgeon wishes to reduce
Possibly tumors that have spread beyond the prostate if they have not yet reached the lymph nodes

Strong predictors of treatment failure include:

A history of both hormonal and radiation treatments
Tumor grades 8 and above
PSA levels of more than 10 ng/mL

Complications. Complications are similar to those of standard prostatectomy, but incontinence rates are much lower. Impotence rates, however, are much higher. Nevertheless, 96% of patients report that they are satisfied with the results. Incontinence and other side effects may be higher in patients who have had previous radiation treatments. Other significant complications include scarring and narrowing of the urethra, and fistulas (abnormal passages from internal organs to the skin or between two internal organs).

Radiation Treatments

The two major radiation treatments are:

External beam radiation
Brachytherapy (internal radiation)

Both treatments have generally equal success rates. Research presented at the 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium indicated that the two therapies work equally well for treating localized prostate cancer. In some cases, both techniques may be used in high-risk patients.

In external beam radiation therapy, a doctor focuses a beam of radiation directly on the tumor for 35 3-minute treatments given 5 times a week over 7 weeks. 3-D conformal techniques use computers and a three-dimensional image of the prostate to target the tumor precisely, using high-dose radiation beams. It poses a lower risk for inflammation. Men who have had transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or have a history of lower urinary tract symptoms may be particularly good candidates for 3D conformal techniques.

According to the 2007 American Urological Association guidelines for treatment of localized prostate cancer, patients considering external beam radiation should know that higher radiation doses may reduce the risk for cancer recurrence and improve survival outcome.

Brachytherapy is an outpatient technique that implants radioactive "seeds" directly into the prostate. Implants can be temporary or permanent. Temporary implants are usually accompanied by external beam radiation. This procedure requires more skill than external beam radiation therapy and, even with experienced doctors, the distribution of radioactive seeds is uneven in 15% of cases, increasing the risk for insufficient doses.

Computerized systems are being developed to help oncologists optimize seed placement and allow precise treatment for each patient and higher radiation doses. Eventually, it could improve tumor control, reduce side effects, and cut costs.

It is common for PSA levels to temporarily rise, or "bounce," following seed implantation without it being a signal for cancer recurrence. This effect can produce anxiety and can interfere with the diagnosis of true recurrence.

Candidates. Studies suggest that brachytherapy is useful for select patients, specifically those with prostate volumes less than 60 mL and who have early-stage prostate cancer (T1 or T2 tumors, a Gleason grade lower than 7, and PSA levels below 10 ng/mL). It may be beneficial in patients with inflammatory bowel disease or with cancer close to the bowel. Poorer candidates for brachytherapy include men who have had TURP and patients with advanced cancer, high-grade tumors, or very enlarged prostate glands.

The side effects of radiation therapy include most of those of surgery, but the risks for impotence and incontinence are considerably lower. A 2000 study concluded that adjuvant radiation therapy (given right after surgery) in moderate doses does not increase the risk for long-term urinary incontinence or sexual dysfunction beyond that of surgery alone.

Gastrointestinal Complications. Complications in the gastrointestinal are common. Short-term effects include nausea and loss of appetite. Diarrhea is a very common side effect and can last for the duration of therapy. It is usually treated with Lomotil. A few patients have diarrhea flare-ups for years afterwards. Less than 1% suffer more serious intestinal problems.

There is potential for injury to the rectum with brachytherapy. Ulcers in the rectum occur in more than 10% of patients, but the risk decreases with greater experience in the technique.

Urinary Problems. The risk for incontinence is about 7 - 20%. Patients treated with radiation may experience a painful, but usually temporary, urinary tract inflammation. About 10 - 15% of patients develop a long-term urgent and frequent need to void their bladder. Brachytherapy carries a lower risk for urinary incontinence.

Scarring and narrowing of the urinary tract (stricture) may occur, particularly in men who had TURP performed within a short time before radiation treatment. In such men, radiation treatments should be delayed by 4 - 6 weeks. If the prostate has been injured or damaged or the bladder is easily irritated, side effects with brachytherapy may actually be worse than with other procedures.

Impotence. In a 2003 review, the risk for impotence following radiotherapy varied from 25% with brachytherapy to 45% with external beam radiotherapy. Still, very few studies on brachytherapy have lasted more than 2 years, so more research is needed.

Sildenafil (Viagra) may help many men experiencing impotence following radiation therapy for local prostate cancer. Early use of both alprostadil injections and sildenafil may be even more effective. Other treatments may also be useful. [See In-Depth Report #15: Erectile dysfunction.]

Investigators are testing radiation treatments that use a combination of neutrons and protons (mixed-beam) or proton beams rather than the standard proton radiation therapy. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is a promising technique that delivers different doses to multiple target areas using images of specific regions.

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). Studies are reporting promising results with an intensive ultrasound procedure called transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). It allows for very precise minimally invasive removal of tissue in local prostate cancers. It may eventually prove to be an alternative to radiation therapy. More research, with long-term follow up, is needed.

Radiofrequency. Radiofrequency is being used to heat and destroy the prostate. Early studies suggest that this is a promising approach.

Options if Treatments Fail

Rising PSA Levels. If prostate cancer has been eliminated, PSA levels should drop to 0.5 ng/mL or less after treatment. A sudden rise or persistently elevated PSA levels after treatment are often indications that prostate cancer persists:

If PSA levels are above 2.0 ng/mL, then cancer is most likely still present.
If PSA levels are between 0.5 - 2.0 ng/mL, the situation is less clear. One study indicated that measuring free PSA may help determine the status of the cancer in such patients. An average free PSA of 27% indicated that cancer had been eliminated, while an average of 15% meant that cancer was still present.

Note: It is common for PSA levels to temporarily rise following radiation seed implantation without signaling cancer recurrence.

Rising PSA levels do not necessarily mean that the cancer has spread or even that the cancer will recur during a man's lifetime. An actual cure is still possible if the cancer is localized within the prostate. In one study, 64% of patients with rising PSA levels after surgery still had cancer confined to the prostate. Indications of a poorer outlook in this study included:

Cancer penetration of the prostate capsule
Positive surgical margins (microscopic evidence of cancer cells at the very edge of the resected specimen)
Invasion of nearby vessels or lymph nodes

Still, among the men in the study, after 7 years only 3% of patients had died of prostate cancer. After 15 years, only 19% had evidence of recurrence. Other markers for persistent cancer are under investigation. For example blood tests that show low levels of acid phosphatase (ACP) before treatments may predict a higher chance for recurrence-free survival.

Treatment for recurring cancer is not always clear-cut. If the cancer recurs locally, cure may still be possible:

Surgery and androgen deprivation therapy may be considered for patients who were first treated with radiation.
For patients who were initially treated with surgery, radiation or androgen deprivation therapy are both options.

If the disease has already spread or if the doctor suspects that it may have spread, the patient is typically given androgen deprivation therapy. Chemotherapy drugs in combination with hormonal drugs are being investigated for patients who fail surgery or radiation.

A 2005 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggested three factors that may help doctors and patients decide if additional treatment is needed if cancer recurs after surgery:

How quickly PSA levels double after surgery (shorter time equals higher risk)
How quickly the cancer recurred after surgery (shorter time equals higher risk)
Gleason score (higher score suggests more aggressive tumors and greater risk)

Patients at high risk are more likely to die from the recurrent cancer and should be considered for additional treatments. Patients at low risk face a lower likelihood of death from prostate cancer and probably do not require more treatment. The study found that for patients at low risk, the time to death after cancer recurrence was very long, generally lasting more than 16 years.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Androgen deprivation therapy, also called androgen suppression therapy or hormone therapy, involves blocking the effect of male hormones such as testosterone through medical (drugs) or surgical castration. Androgen suppression therapy is not recommended as a first-line approach for most men with localized prostate cancer. It is usually given to patients with recurrent, progressive, or advanced prostate cancer. It may also be given for a relatively brief time in combination with external beam radiation.

Although androgen deprivation therapy slows the growth of most prostate cancers, it can have serious side effects. The American Society of Oncology’s (ASCO) 2007 guidelines do not recommend the early use of hormone therapy. However, ASCO does recommend that patients start therapy once they begin to experience cancer symptoms. Patients who defer therapy should have regular doctor visits every 3 - 6 months to monitor their condition.

Salvage Prostatectomy. Salvage prostatectomy is sometimes performed after unsuccessful radiation treatment if the cancer is still local. The odds of the procedure's success are only 10 - 64%. Many experts recommend against salvage prostatectomy in most cases of radiation failure. Severe complication rates for salvage prostatectomy are very high: 10 times that of men who have not had radiation. For example, incontinence after salvage prostatectomy is often untreatable with medications, collagen implants, or other standard treatment measures.

Salvage Cryosurgery. Salvage cryosurgery may be effective in certain patients who fail external beam radiotherapy. The best candidates are those with Stage II cancer or less and PSA levels below 10 ng/mL.

Adjuvant and Salvage Radiation. Radiation is proving to help patients who still show detectable levels of PSA after surgery (generally 2 ng/mL or less). It may even be useful years after surgery if PSA levels rise. Depending on timing, radiation after treatment failure is referred to as either:

Adjuvant radiation is radiation therapy performed within 6 months after radical prostatectomy. One area of controversy is whether to use adjuvant radiation after surgery on patients whose PSA levels are very low or undetectable but who have other test results that indicate the cancer is likely to spread. Patients with adverse findings and low PSA have to weigh the potential complications of radiation therapy against the odds of recurrence without it, which are about 20 - 30%. A small 2006 study found that adjuvant radiation worked much better than salvage radiation for men with advanced (stage III or IV) local prostate cancer. However, a 2007 study indicated that adjuvant radiation in men with advanced cancer may reduce the risk of cancer recurrence but does not improve length of survival.
Salvage radiation is radiation therapy more than 6 months after surgery. A 2004 study suggested that salvage radiation could be more beneficial than previously thought, even for men with aggressive prostate cancer. Researchers studied 501 men who had undergone radical prostatectomy (surgical removal of the prostate gland) and subsequently received radiation treatment for recurrent cancer (as indicated by rising PSA levels). Men with lower Gleason scores and lower PSA levels benefited the most from salvage radiation. However, even men with higher-grade cancers were able to delay metastatic cancer progression as long as they received radiation at an early stage while their PSA levels were relatively low (less than 2.0 ng/mL).

Other Treatments

Male hormones (called androgens), particularly testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, determine male secondary sex characteristics and stimulate prostate cell growth. When prostate cells, both healthy and cancerous, are deprived of androgens, they no longer proliferate and eventually die.

Androgen deprivation therapy (also called androgen suppression therapy or hormone therapy) uses drugs or surgery (orchiectomy) to suppress or block male hormones (androgen) -- particularly testosterone and dihydrotestosterone -- that stimulate the growth of prostate cells. Androgen deprivation therapy is used for advanced and metastatic cancer and may be used if treatment for localized prostate cancer has failed and cancer recurs (as indicated by rising PSA levels). Side effects can include decreased bone density, decreased muscle mass, hot flashes, depression, fatigue, weight gain, enlarged breasts, and high cholesterol levels. Evidence also indicates that androgen deprivation therapy increases the risk for diabetes and death from heart disease.

There has been some debate about when androgen deprivation therapy should be initiated. In 2007, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published clinical guidelines for androgen deprivation therapy in patients with recurrent, progressive, or advanced prostate cancer. The guidelines recommend that hormone therapy should, in general, be delayed until patients begin to experience symptoms from their cancer. However, when therapy is deferred, patients should regularly visit their doctors every 3 - 6 months for careful monitoring of their condition.

ASCO recommends either removal of both testicles (bilateral orchiectomy) or injections with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) as initial androgen deprivation treatments. Combining nonsteroidal antiandrogen drug therapy with orchiectomy or LHRH may also be considered.

Doctors vary widely on their opinions of androgen deprivation therapy. A 2006 study found that the decision to use hormonal therapy depends more on a patient’s urologist than on the patient’s tumor or other factors.

Androgen deprivation therapy includes:

Hormonal Drugs. The primary drugs used for suppressing androgens are called luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists.

Orchiectomy. Orchiectomy is the surgical removal of the testicles. It is the single most effective method of reducing androgen hormones, but it is considered an extreme procedure. Studies do not indicate that it significantly improves survival rates. Orchiectomy plus radical prostatectomy may delay progression in patients with cancers that have spread only to the pelvic lymph nodes. Combining orchiectomy with antiandrogen drug therapy adds a modest benefit.

The median survival rate after the operation is about 55% over a 40-month period. An estimated 25% of patients survive 5 years or more. Nevertheless, orchiectomy, although irreversible, may produce fewer adverse effects than hormonal drugs, and interestingly, many patients report significantly higher quality of life after orchiectomy than those who opt for hormonal treatment, particularly total androgen ablation. Because orchiectomy is irreversible, about 75% of patients with advanced prostate cancer choose hormonal therapy to block androgens. Like all androgen deprivation therapies, orchiectomy increases the risk for osteoporosis.

Many men can still achieve erection after orchiectomy, but there is almost always a decline in sexual drive. Men who cannot achieve erection may be candidates for a penile implant. Patients do not experience a reversal of sex characteristics; the voice does not change and body hair is not affected.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy Before or With Radiation. Hormonal drugs combined with radiation therapy may improve survival rates in moderate- or high-risk groups. Patients may need to take these drugs long-term to improve outcomes. Hormonal drugs before radiation (neoadjuvant therapy) may be helpful in shrinking enlarged glands so that brachytherapy (radiation implants) can be used.

An important study published in 2004 in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that for men with localized prostate cancer, a 6-month course of hormone therapy combined with radiation treatments produced greater survival rates than radiation treatment alone. Standard medical practice has generally indicated that hormone therapy should be administered for 3 years; the JAMA study suggests that a shorter regimen may be equally beneficial for some patients and may help reduce the side effects that typically accompany androgen-suppressing drugs.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy Before or After Surgery. Some studies suggest benefits from using hormone therapy before surgery (neoadjuvant therapy) to reduce the tumor size, although it is not clear yet if this approach has survival benefits. Hormonal treatment may be useful after surgery in men who have high-grade tumors or tumors that have invaded the semen-carrying vessels or lymph nodes. Such men have a risk for failure after surgery of 50 - 80%.

The primary drugs used for suppressing androgens are called luteinizing hormone-releasing hormones (LHRH) agonists. They include:

Leuprolide (Lupron, Leuprogel). Studies report that disease progression is prevented in 72% of men taking daily leuprolide and up to 89% of those taking monthly injections. Certain men, however, may not respond to injections. Drug delivery using implants is under investigation.
Goserelin (Zoladex). Partial responses of 60 - 80% have been reported. A controlled release formulation has been developed that increases the time between injections from 4 weeks to 3 months.
Buserelin.

LHRH drugs block the pituitary gland from producing hormones that stimulate testosterone production. Patients must have injections of LHRH agonists for the rest of their lives.

Testosterone and PSA Surges. Treatment with LHRH agonists produces a testosterone surge in the first week, which may actually intensify symptoms. After this phase, testosterone levels drop to near zero. Leuprogel, a newer leuprolide, may pose a lower risk for this effect. Researchers are investigating other drugs, such as GnRH antagonists, that do not produce this surge.

LH-RH agonists can also cause PSA levels to rise temporarily. Administering flutamide, a drug known as an antiandrogen, for 2 weeks prior to LH-RH agonists may not only prevent PSA surge but also induce early declines in PSA levels.

Side Effects. Side effects include hot flashes and occasionally nipple and breast tenderness.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulates the pituitary gland to release luteinizing hormone-releasing hormones (LHRH). GnRH antagonist drugs such as abarelix (Plenais) and histrelin (Vanta) block this action. They have two advantages over LHRH agonists:

They do not cause the same testosterone surge that can temporarily worsen cancer symptoms.
They seem to reduce testosterone levels more quickly.

Anti-androgens are drugs used to block the effects of testosterone. They are used alone or in maximal androgen blockage (MAB), in which they are combined with LHRH agonists or orchiectomy to completely block androgen hormones. Anti-androgens are either steroidal or nonsteroidal.

Nonsteroidal Anti-androgens. Nonsteroidal anti-androgen drugs include:

Flutamide (Eulexin, Drogenil). Flutamide has produced extended response in some patients. Side effects may include diarrhea and liver damage, which has been fatal in rare cases; liver function must be monitored closely.
Nilutamide (Nilandron). Nilutamide is associated with reversible interstitial pneumonitis, nausea, alcohol intolerance, and visual disturbances.
Bicalutamide (Casodex). Bicalutamide is effective and appears to have fewer severe side effects than other anti-androgens, including loss of sexual interest, osteoporosis, visual disturbance, and interstitial pneumonia. This drug is proving to have survival rates equal to those of maximal androgen blockage.

Steroidal Antiandrogens. Steroidal antiandrogens act like female hormones and include:

Megestrol uppresses androgen production, but incompletely, and is generally not used as initial therapy.
Cyproterone combined with estrogen may prevent the testosterone surge that occurs with LH-RH agonists.

Men often experience fatigue, loss of energy, and emotional distress from androgen suppression treatment. Hormonal therapy may significantly impair quality of life, particularly in men who had no symptoms beforehand and whose cancer has not metastasized. Common side effects of androgen suppression drugs include:

Osteoporosis, the loss of bone density. This risk is higher with orchiectomy than with androgen suppressants. Some androgen suppressants, such as bicalutamide, may cause less bone loss. The use of estrogens may actually be bone protective. A number of medications, especially bisphosphonates, are available to help prevent or reduce bone loss.
Diarrhea
Loss of muscle mass
Psychological disturbances
Fatigue
Loss of sexual drive and sexual dysfunction
Swelling of the breasts (gynecomastia)
Nausea and vomiting
Hair loss
Anemia

In addition, there is growing evidence that androgen deprivation therapy increases the risks for diabetes and heart disease.

Prostate cancer that does not respond to hormonal treatment is called hormone-resistant, or hormone-refractory, cancer. There are various drug treatments for hormone-resistant cancer:

Docetaxel and Other Chemotherapy. Chemotherapy drugs for prostate cancer include docetaxel (Taxotere), mitoxantrone (Novantrone), estramustine (Emcyt), and various platinum-based drugs, such as carboplatin. These drugs are often combined with other cancer drugs (such as 5-fluorouacil) or corticosteroids (such as prednisone).

Docetaxel-based drug regimens are emerging as the main chemotherapy treatment for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. In 2004, the FDA approved docetaxel injection in combination with prednisone for treatment of patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer. Patients who received this drug combination survived on average 2.5 months longer than patients who received mitoxantrone and prednisone. Another 2004 clinical trial found that a docetaxel and estramustine combination worked better than mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced resistant prostate cancer. Side effects can be serious and may include gastrointestinal problems (nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), fatigue, low blood cell counts, and increased risk for blood clots.

Researchers are continuing to investigate docetaxel combinations and compare them to other chemotherapy regimens. A large 2006 study reported that docetaxel and prednisone worked better than mitoxantrone plus prednisone in improving quality of life, pain relief, and survival. Docetaxel is also being investigated in combination with vitamin D-related drugs. A 2006 trial found that men with advanced prostate cancer who took docetaxel plus high-dose vitamin D (calcitriol) lived about 8 months longer than men who received docetaxel and placebo. Calcitriol also appeared to protect against docetaxel’s side effects, especially gastrointestinal problems and blood clots.

Doctors are also studying other ways to help patients cope with docetaxel’s side effects. Research presented at the 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium suggested that patients may be able to take periodic breaks from docetaxel treatment instead of having continuous therapy. In the study, patients with advanced prostate cancer were given the option of suspending docetaxel treatment if their PSA levels improved within a certain range. Researchers found that patients were able to take 16-week breaks and still show improvement once they resumed treatment. This approach may work best for patients who experienced a good initial response to docetaxel.

Bisphosphonates. These drugs prevent bone loss and reduce bone pain in metastasized cancers. They are of particular interest because they may inhibit prostate cancer cell growth in the bone. The bisphosphonates showing most promise in prostate cancer are newer drugs called nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (pamidronate, zoledronic acid).

Immunotherapies. The prostate organ offers special possibilities for genetic therapies because it contains highly specific antigens (factors that the immune system can target). There are a number of approaches currently under investigation, including:

Genetically designed vaccines (Provenge, Gvaz, JBT 1001) inject factors into prostate cancer cells that trick the immune system into attacking the cancer cells.
Antisense therapy for prostate cancer blocks expression of a protein called BCL-2, which tends to be genetically overexpressed in some patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. This protein prevents apoptosis (a natural process by which all cells, including cancer cells, self-destruct).
Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are genetically designed immune factors that target foreign compounds called antigens for attack by the immune system. Monoclonal antibodies are being designed to target prostate-specific antigens.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors. Much research is focusing on drugs that block small molecules involved with the growth of blood vessels that feed the tumor (a process called angiogenesis ). The spread of new blood vessels is controlled by compounds called growth factors, which may be important in cancer cell proliferation. Researchers are interested in drugs that turn off these growth factors or their receptors, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In doing so, the drugs may be able to cut off cancer's life blood. Gefitinib (Iressa) and erlotinib (Tarceva) are angiogenesis inhibitors that target receptors of epidermal growth factors called tyrosine kinase. They are being used in lung cancer and are being investigated in a number of other cancers, include prostate cancer. Various drugs that inhibit angiogenesis in other ways (thalidomide, endostatin) are also under investigation.

Ketoconazole. Ketoconazole is an antifungal drug that blocks an enzyme that stimulates production of testosterone. It is effective in high doses but can have severe gastrointestinal effects, mainly nausea and anorexia. Long-term use can result in impotence, itchy skin, nail changes, and suppression of stress hormones. One center reported a consistent PSA response in more than 60% of patients who had failed other androgen deprivation treatments.

Aromatase Blockers. Aminoglutethimide (Cytadren) and similar drugs block aromatase, an enzyme important in estrogen production. Because the female hormone estrogen plays such a major role in the development of breast cancer, some experts think that blocking the small amount of estrogen found in men may also affect prostate cancer. Side effects include drowsiness and skin rash.

Atrasentan. Atrasentan is known as an ET(A)-receptor antagonist. It is showing promise in reducing bone loss and delaying progression of prostate cancer in men with advanced disease that no longer responds to hormone therapy. Side effects are relatively mild.

Resources

www.cancer.gov -- National Cancer Institute
www.cancer.org -- American Cancer Society
www.asco.org -- American Society of Clinical Oncology
www.plwc.org -- People Living with Cancer
www.prostatecancerfoundation.org -- Prostate Cancer Foundation
www.fightprostatecancer.org -- National Prostate Cancer Coalition
www.urologyhealth.org -- Urology Health
www.nccn.org -- National Comprehensive Cancer Network
www.cdc.gov/cancer/prostate -- CDC Cancer Prevention and Control
www.psa-rising.com -- PSA Rising: Prostate Cancer Survivor Info
www.ustoo.org -- Us Too! Prostate Cancer Education and Support
www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials -- Find clinical trials

References

Greenspan SL, Nelson JB, Trump DL, Resnick NM. Effect of once-weekly oral alendronate on bone loss in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 20;146(6):416-24.

Gudmundsson J, Sulem P, Manolescu A, Amundadottir LT, Gudbjartsson D, Helgason A, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a second prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24. Nat Genet. 2007 May;39(5):631-7. Epub 2007 Apr 1.

Haiman CA, Patterson N, Freedman ML, Myers SR, Pike MC, Waliszewska A, et al. Multiple regions within 8q24 independently affect risk for prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2007 May;39(5):638-44. Epub 2007 Apr 1.

Keating NL, O'Malley AJ, Smith MR. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 20;24(27):4448-56.

Lawson KA, Wright ME, Subar A, Mouw T, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A, et al. Multivitamin use and risk of prostate cancer in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 May 16;99(10):754-64.

Leman ES, Cannon GW, Trock BJ, Sokoll LJ, Chan DW, Mangold L, et al. EPCA-2: a highly specific serum marker for prostate cancer. Urology. 2007 Apr;69(4):714-20.

Loblaw DA, Virgo KS, Nam R, Somerfield MR, Ben-Josef E, Mendelson DS, et al. Initial hormonal management of androgen-sensitive metastatic, recurrent, or progressive prostate cancer: 2006 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 20;25(12):1596-605. Epub 2007 Apr 2.

Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007update. J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2106-31.

Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2329-35.

Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K, Konety BR. PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2336-42.

Yeager M, Orr N, Hayes RB, Jacobs KB, Kraft P, Wacholder S, et al. Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24. Nat Genet. 2007 May;39(5):645-9. Epub 2007 Apr 1.

Review Date:
6/27/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M., Inc. is accredited by URAC, also known as the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission (www.urac.org). URAC's accreditation program is an independent audit to verify that A.D.A.M. follows rigorous standards of quality and accountability. A.D.A.M. is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial policy, editorial process and privacy policy. A.D.A.M. is also a founding member of Hi-Ethics and subscribes to the principles of the Health on the Net Foundation (www.hon.ch).

A.D.A.M. Copyright

The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical professional should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. © 1997-2009 A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.

adam.com

Kidney stones

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:35 -0700

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

New Research:

Patients who have the most common type of gastric bypass surgery, the Roux-en-Y, are at increased risk for kidney stones, beginning 6 months after surgery, according to a study published in 2006.

Causes of Kidney Stones:

Calcium stones form when there is an imbalance in the urine substances that promote and block the formation of stones. Often, the cause of this imbalance is unknown.
Having acidic urine or too much uric acid in the body leads to the formation of uric acid stones.
Struvite stones are almost always caused by urinary tract infections due to bacteria that produce certain enzymes.
Other stones, including cystine and xanthine stones, are usually due to genetic abnormalities.

Treatments:

In about 85% of patients, the kidney stones are small enough that they pass through normal urination, usually within 2 - 3 days.
Certain medications can prevent recurrence of stones in people who are at high risk.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a technique that uses sound waves (ultrasound) to break up simple stones in the kidney or upper urinary tract. The shock waves are delivered from outside the body.
Surgery may be necessary if the stone or stones are too big to pass, and cannot be broken down through ESWL.
A change of diet and increased drinking of fluids, especially water, will help prevent a recurrence.

Introduction

Kidney stones are hard, solid rocks that form in the urinary tract. In many cases, the stones are very small and can pass out of the body without any problems. However, if a stone (even a small one) blocks the flow of urine, excruciating pain may result, and prompt medical treatment may be needed.

The process of urination begins in the kidneys. The kidneys filter out fluids and waste from the body, producing urine. The two kidneys are located deep behind the abdominal organs, below the ribs and toward the middle of the back.

Each kidney contains over a million nephrons. These are the tiny filtration units of the kidney.
Each nephron is composed of a tiny group of blood vessels (a glomerulus) enclosed in a funnel-like structure called Bowman's capsule.
Each glomerulus filters waste products, water, and salts out of the liquid part of the blood (plasma) that has entered the kidney.
About 1% of the plasma is converted into urine. The rest returns into the blood to prevent dehydration. Urine is primarily made of acids, urea, and creatinine (nitrogen compounds).
Urine passes from Bowman's capsule into tiny tubules, which lead to large collecting tubes in the center of the kidney. As the urine passes through this network, it becomes more concentrated.
Urine then flows from the kidney through thin tubes called ureters into the bladder.
The bladder's stretchy walls expand to store the incoming urine until it leaves the body through a tube called the urethra.

The kidneys are responsible for removing wastes from the body, regulating electrolyte balance and blood pressure, and stimulating red blood cell production.

Click the icon to see an image of the urinary tract.

Occasionally, various salts build up on the inside surfaces of the kidney and form crystals. Eventually these crystals become large enough to form stones in the kidney, a condition called nephrolithiasis. Kidney stones (renal calculi) may also form in the ureter or the bladder. Combinations of minerals and other chemicals, some derived from a person's diet, make up the salts in these stones.

Click the icon to see an image of the kidney stones.

Calcium Stones. About 70 - 90% of all kidney stones are made of calcium, usually combined with oxalate, or oxalic acid. A number of common vegetables, fruits, and grains contain oxalate.

About 6% of calcium stones are made of calcium phosphate (called brushite).

Uric Acid Stones. Uric acid is responsible for close to 10% of kidney stones. It is the breakdown product of purines, nitrogen compounds found in our bodies and in certain foods. The breakdown of purines to uric acid occurs in the liver, and from there uric acid enters the bloodstream, most of it passing into the kidneys. From the kidneys, uric acid leaves the body in the urine. Often, uric acid stones occur with calcium stones.

Struvite Stones. Struvite stones are made of magnesium ammonium phosphate. They are almost always associated with certain urinary tract infections. Worldwide, they make up to 30% of all kidney stones. In the United States, however, less than 15% of all stones are struvite. Most struvite stones occur in women. The rate of these stones may be declining in America, perhaps because of better control of urinary tract infections.

Cystine Stones. A build-up of the amino acid cystine, a building block of protein, causes 1% of kidney stones in adults and up to 8% of stones in children. The tendency to form these stones is inherited. Cystine stones are marked by rapid growth and recurrence, which, if not treated promptly, can eventually lead to kidney failure.

Xanthine Stones. Other kidney stones are composed of xanthine, a nitrogen compound. These stones are extremely uncommon and usually occur as a result of a rare genetic disorder.

Click the icon to see an animation about kidney stones.

Causes

The key process in the development of kidney stones is supersaturation.

The urine carries salts, including calcium oxalate, uric acid, cystine, or xanthine.
These salts can become extremely concentrated if there is not enough urine, or if unusually high amounts of crystal-forming salts are present.
When salt concentration levels reach the point at which they no longer dissolve, these salts form crystals.

Different factors may be involved in either reducing urine amount, or increasing the levels of the salts.

Deficiencies in Protective Factors. Normally, urine contains substances that may protect against stone formation, including:

Magnesium
Citrate
Pyrophosphate
Enzymes

These substances:

Allow salt in the urine to be at higher-than-normal concentrations without forming crystals
Prevent crystal formation
Coat the crystals and prevent them from sticking to the surface of kidney tubes

Not having enough of these protective substances can cause stones.

Changes in the Acidity of the Urine. Changes in the acid balance of the urine can affect stone formation.

Uric acid and cystine stones mainly form in acidic urine.
Calcium phosphate and struvite stones increase in alkaline urine.

Factors that Bind Crystals to the Kidney Tubules. Researchers are studying the cells lining the kidney tubules in order to understand how and why early crystals bind to the tubes long enough to form stones. Under investigation are elevated levels of substances that either cause crystals to stick to the tubes or deficiencies in those that prevent them from sticking.

In general, calcium stones form when there is an imbalance in the urine substances that promote and block the formation of stones. Often, the cause of calcium stones is not known, and the condition is then called idiopathic nephrolithiasis. Research suggests that nearly all stones result from problems in the breakdown and absorption of calcium and oxalate. Genetic factors may play a role in about half of these cases. A number of medical conditions and drugs can also affect digestion and intestinal absorption.

Excess Calcium in the Urine (Hypercalciuria). Hypercalciuria (too much calcium in the urine) is responsible for as much as 70% of calcium-containing stones. A number of conditions may produce hypercalciuria. Many are due to genetic factors, but most cases are idiopathic (due to unknown causes).

The following can lead to hypercalciuria and calcium stones:

Too much calcium absorption in the intestines: In most of these conditions, genetic factors lead to increased calcium absorption in the intestine. Researchers are investigating a possible defective gene that regulates calcitriol, a form of vitamin D, which, in excess levels, may increase intestinal absorption of calcium.
Excessive chloride: Chloride has a negative charge, and calcium has a positive one, so they balance each other in the body. Excess chloride may lead to excess calcium. A gene known as CLCN5, which regulates chloride in the urine, is defective in many patients with calcium stones.
Renal calcium leak: In this condition, the filtering processes in the kidney fail, causing an increase of calcium in the urine.
Excessive sodium: High urinary levels of sodium result in increased levels of calcium. Certain defects in the kidney tubules transport system, which cause imbalances in sodium and phosphate, can lead to high calcium levels in the urine. A diet high in salt can also produce this effect.

Excess Oxalate in the Urine (Hyperoxaluria). Oxalate is the most common stone-forming compound. Excessive oxalate in the urine (hyperoxaluria) is responsible for up to 60% of calcium stones and is a more common cause of stones than too much calcium in the urine.

Hyperoxaluria can be either primary or secondary.

Primary hyperoxaluria is an inherited disorder in which too much oxalate in the urine is the main problem.
Secondary hyperoxaluria results from specific conditions that cause high levels of urinary oxalate.

Secondary hyperoxaluria is usually caused by too much dietary oxalates (found in a number of common vegetables, fruits, and grains) or by problems in the body's breakdown of oxalates. Such defects may be due to various factors:

Severe vitamin B6 deficiencies (usually due to genetic disorders)
Deficiencies in Oxalobacter formigene, an intestinal bacteria that breaks down oxalate
Short bowel syndrome, a condition that makes the intestines unable to properly absorb fat and nutrients; calcium may bind to unabsorbed fat instead of oxalates, which causes a buildup of oxalate
Androgens (male hormones)

Female hormones (estrogens) actually lower the risk of hyperoxaluria. Estrogen may help prevent the formation of calcium oxalate stones by keeping urine alkaline, and raising protective citrate levels.

A study published in 2006 found that patients who undergo the most common gastric type of bypass surgery, the Roux-en-Y, were at increased risk for calcium oxalate kidney stones, beginning 6 months after surgery. The study found that patients who underwent the procedure developed hyperoxaluria, and the condition was common 12 months after surgery. The authors also noted an increased number of kidney stone incidents in this patient group.

Excessive Calcium in the Bloodstream (Hypercalcemia). Hypercalcemia generally occurs when bones break down and release too much calcium into the bloodstream. This is a process called resorption. It can occur from a number of different diseases and events:

Hyperparathyroidism: Overactive parathyroid glands cause about 5% of calcium stones. People with this disorder have at least a 20% chance of developing kidney stones. Women are more likely to have this disorder than men.
Immobilization: Lack of movement can lead to kidney stones.
Renal tubular acidosis: This disorder causes acidic and alkaline imbalance. Renal tubular acidosis not only increases calcium levels in the bloodstream but also reduces protective citrate levels.

Hyperuricosuria is a condition of high levels of uric acid in urine. It occurs in between 15 - 20% of people (mostly men) with calcium oxalate stones. Urate, the salt formed from uric acid, creates the center of a crystal (nidus), around which calcium oxalate crystals form and grow. Such stones tend to be severe and recurrent. They appear to be strongly related to a high intake of protein. (Hyperuricosuria also plays a major role in some uric acid stones.)

Low Urine Levels of Citrate (Hypocitraturia). Citrate is the main substance in the body that is responsible for removing excess calcium. It also blocks the process that turns calcium crystals into stones. Low levels of citrate in the urine (hypocitraturia) is a significant risk factor for calcium stones. In addition, hypocitraturia also increases the risk for uric acid stones. This condition most likely contributes to about a third of all kidney stones.

Many conditions can reduce citrate levels. Some causes include:

Renal tubular acidosis
Potassium or magnesium deficiency
Urinary tract infection
Kidney failure
Chronic diarrhea

Often, however, the cause of hypocitraturia-related stones is unknown.

Low Levels of Other Stone-Blocking Compounds. Several other compounds in the urine, including magnesium and pyrophosphate, also prevent the formation of calcium stones. If any of these compounds are lacking, stones may develop.

Nanobacteria Infection. Nanobacteria are tiny infectious organisms that can pass from the blood into urine. They coat themselves with mineral deposits that resemble the composition of kidney stones. Cells infected with these bacteria develop mineral deposits on the inside and outside. Researchers believe that nanobacteria may form the cores of the kidney stones in many people.

Human body tissues, certain foods, and certain alcoholic drinks contain substances called purines. Purine-containing foods include dried beans, peas, and liver. When the body breaks down purines, it produces uric acid. The presence of a certain level of uric acid in the body is normal.

The following conditions are usually seen in patients with uric acid stones:

Too much acid in the urine for a long period (the most important cause of uric acid stones)
Lower than normal amounts of urine produced.
Hyperuricosuria, a metabolic disorder that leads to high levels of uric acid in the urine

Note: Hyperuricosuria can also trigger calcium stones. Therefore, a combination of calcium and uric acid stones may be present in patients with hyperuricosuria.

A number of conditions and other factors may contribute to, or cause, uric acid stones:

Gout: Uric acid and other kidney stones develop in up to 25% of patients with primary gout, a painful form of arthritis that occurs when uric acid in the blood forms crystals in one or more joints.
Diabetes: New research has shown that people with type 2 diabetes have highly acidic urine that can lead to kidney stones, particularly uric acid stones. The findings were published in the May 2006 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.
Insulin resistance: People with insulin resistance are at an increased risk for uric acid stones. The reason is unknown but may be related to the transport of certain salts through the kidneys. This transport changes in patients with insulin resistance.
Kidney abnormalities: Kidney problems that reduce the production of ammonia, particularly in people with diabetes or insulin resistance, may lead to uric acid stones.
Genetic factors: Genetic factors can increase a person's risk for uric acid stones.
Hypocitraturia: Hypocitraturia is a low amount of citrate in the urine.
Diet: Eating too much animal protein increases the risk of forming uric acid stones.

Other risk factors include:

Certain medications (chemotherapy drugs, diuretics, and salicylates)
Binge drinking
Not eating for long periods of time (fasting)
Lead poisoning
Blood cancers (leukemia, multiple myeloma, and lymphomas)
Some rare types of anemia (low levels of red blood cells in the blood)
Chronic diarrhea

Struvite stones are almost always caused by urinary tract infections due to bacteria that produce certain enzymes. These enzymes raise the concentration of ammonia in the urine. Ammonia makes up the crystals that form struvite stones. The stone-promoting bacteria are usually Proteus, but may also include Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Providencia, Serratia, and staphylococci. Women are twice as likely to have struvite stones as men.

Other stones, including cystine and xanthine stones, are usually due to genetic abnormalities.

Causes of Cystine Stones. Cystine stones develop from genetic defects that cause abnormal transport of amino acids in the kidney and gastrointestinal system leading to a build-up of cystine, one of these amino acids. Researchers have identified two genes responsible for this condition: SLC3A1 and CLC7A9.

Causes of Xanthine Stones. In some cases, xanthine stones may develop in patients being treated with allopurinol for gout.

Risk Factors

Kidney stones are one of the most common disorders of the urinary tract. They are an ancient health problem. Evidence of kidney stones has been found in an Egyptian mummy estimated to be more than 7,000 years old.

An estimated 1.3 million Americans seek medical help for kidney stones each year. At this time, studies suggest kidney stones affect over 5% of Americans and that the rate has increased since the 1970s, perhaps because of increases in animal and dietary protein intake.

Men. The risk of kidney stones increases in a man's 40s and continues to rise until age 70. Caucasian men are at higher risk than other groups.

Women. The risk of kidney stones peaks in a woman's 50s. In younger women, stones are more likely to develop during the late stages of pregnancy. Pregnant women tend to have a higher calcium intake, but their kidneys do no handle the calcium as well as they did prior to pregnancy. Kidney stones are still a rare occurrence during pregnancy, however, affecting only 1 in 1,500 pregnancies.

Risk Factors in Children. Stones in the urinary tract in children are usually due to genetic factors. Most of the time, the cause is too much calcium in the urine (hypercalciuria). Deformities in the urinary tract pose a significant risk for kidney stones in children. Children with low birth weight who need to be fed intravenously are also at risk for stones.

Obesity and weight gain are both associated with an increased risk of kidney stones.

Men who weigh more than 220 lbs are 44% more likely to develop kidney stones than men who weigh less than 150 lbs.
Women who are obese are 90% more likely to develop kidney stones than women with a lower body mass index (BMI).

Higher BMIs and larger waist circumferences are both risk factors for kidney stones. Researchers think that there may be a link between fat tissue, insulin resistance, and urine composition. People with larger body sizes may excrete more calcium and uric acid, which increase the risk of kidney stone formation.

A family history of kidney stones increases one's risk for the condition. Researchers are looking into markers or other factors that might predict kidney stones in relatives, although none has yet been clearly identified. One report found that among the siblings of patients with calcium stones, sisters with higher urinary calcium levels and more acidic urine were more likely to develop stones. Brothers with high urinary calcium, low urinary potassium, and older age were more likely to have the problem. A family history of gout may also make a person vulnerable to stones.

According to a 2003 study of American ethnic groups, Caucasians have the highest incidence of kidney stones (5.9%) followed by Mexican Americans (2.6%). African-Americans have the lowest risk (1.7%).

Dietary factors, minerals in local water, or both may contribute to geographic differences that have been observed in the occurrence of kidney stones. Studies have reported the highest occurrence of kidney stones in the southern region of the United States and the lowest in the west. One study suggested that the higher risk may be due to a higher rate of high blood pressure in the southern states and certain dietary habits, particularly lower intake of magnesium and low use of calcium supplements.

Specific Foods. In general, certain foods increase the risk for stones only in people who have genetic or medical vulnerability. People whose diets are high in animal protein and low in fiber and fluids may be at higher risk for stones. A number of foods contain oxalic acid, but there is no proof that such foods make any major contribution to calcium oxalate stones in people without other risk factors. However, several studies have shown that increasing dietary calcium and restricting salt, animal protein, and foods rich in oxalate can help prevent calcium oxalate stones from returning.

Stress. One study reported that people who had a major, stressful life experience were more likely to develop stones than those who had not. Some experts speculate that this increased risk may be due to a hormone called vasopressin, which is released in response to stress. Vasopressin also increases the concentration of urine.

Sleep Position. Sleeping in the same position consistently may influence risk. A 2001 study reported that in people who had a history of kidney stones, recurrences tended to occur on the same side that people slept on. An earlier study suggested that people who had kidney stones were more apt to sleep on their stomachs. Movement during sleep did not appear to affect the risk.

Being Bedridden. Any medical or physical condition that keeps a person in bed or immobile increases blood levels of calcium from bone breakdown, thereby posing a risk for stone formation.

Gout. Patients with gout are at a high risk of uric acid stones. These patients have very acidic urine, and a 2002 study suggested that the two disorders may have a common source.

High Blood Pressure. Persons with high blood pressure are up to three times more likely to develop kidney stones. It is not entirely clear whether having high blood pressure increases the risk for a stone, whether stones lead to high blood pressure, or if there is an action linking both.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis cause problems in absorption of substances in the intestines. These problems significantly increase the risk for kidney stones, particularly in men.

Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): Urinary tract infections are almost always the cause of struvite stones.

Hyperparathyroidism: The parathyroid glands regulate calcium levels in the body through the parathyroid hormone. In hyperparathyroidism, one or more of these glands makes too much parathyroid hormone. Some people with hyperparathyroidism develop kidney stones. Surgery to remove the hyperactive parathyroid gland in such patients reduces the risk for stone formation, but the risk still remains high for some time after surgery.

Other Medical Conditions. Kidney disease, chronic diarrhea, certain cancers (such as leukemia and lymphoma), and sarcoidosis put people at higher risk for stones.

AIDS medications. Over 10% of persons with AIDS who take the medicine indinavir develop stones. The risk is even higher in patients with AIDS who also have hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or hemophilia, as well as those who are very thin or who take the antibiotic combination TMP-SMX. In one study of persons with AIDS who took a combination of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine, 36% developed kidney stones.

Other Drugs. Kidney stones are a rare side effect of thyroid hormones and loop diuretics (drugs that increase urination). In fact, diuretics are also used to prevent calcium stones. Certain cancer chemotherapies can also cause kidney stones. Long-term use of medications, such as antacids, which change the acidic content of urine, may increase the risk for kidney stones.

Symptoms

In many cases, kidney stones do not produce symptoms. However, if a stone becomes stuck in the ureter (the thin tube between the bladder and the kidney), symptoms can be very severe. Often, they vary depending on the stone's location and its progress.

Kidney stone attacks tend to be most common late at night or in the early morning, possibly because of minimal urine output or constriction of the ureters during the early morning hours. Kidney stone attacks are least common during the late afternoon

Pain usually begins abruptly on one side and then usually continues as intense, constant pain. (In some cases it persists for a few minutes, disappears, and then returns after about 10 minutes.)
The patient cannot become comfortable and usually stands, sits, paces, or reclines in a vain search for a position that will bring relief.
If the stone is in the kidney or upper urinary tract, the pain usually starts in one flank area (to the side of the back near the waist). It typically moves to the groin as the stone passes down.
If the stone is too large to pass easily, the pain follows the muscle contractions in the wall of the ureter as they try to squeeze the stone along into the bladder.
Nausea and vomiting may occur.
Blood in the urine may be present.
As the stone passes down the ureter closer to the bladder, a person may feel the need to urinate more often or a burning sensation during urination.
If fever and chills accompany any of these symptoms, an infection may be present.

The size of the stone does not necessarily predict the severity of the pain; a very tiny crystal with sharp edges can cause intense pain while a larger round stone may not be as distressing. Struvite stones can often occur without symptoms.

Diagnosis

The doctor will perform a physical exam. This includes pressing against abdominal areas for tender locations that might indicate the presence of the stone.

The patient's age is a significant factor. Kidney stones that occur in children and young patients are more apt to result from inherited problems that cause cystine, xanthine, or, in some cases, calcium oxalate stones. In adult patients, calcium stones are most common.

A medical history may help predict which crystal has formed the stone. The doctor will need to know the following:

Any previous kidney stone attacks
Histories of cancer, sarcoidosis, or small bowel disease
Any medications being taken, including non-prescription substances, particularly high doses of vitamins D or C and calcium-containing antacids

Many conditions can cause symptoms similar to kidney stones. Usually the diagnosis is easily made because of the specific nature of the symptoms, but it is not always clear. Urinary tract infections can cause similar, but usually less intense, pain. In fact, infection may be present with a kidney stone. Other causes of pain that may mimic kidney stones include:

Gallstones
Diverticulitis (infection or irritation of abnormal pockets in the intestines)
Intestinal blockage
Blood clots
Irritable bowel syndrome
Appendicitis
Stomach ulcers
Hiatal hernia (when the upper part of the stomach bulges into the chest, through an opening in the diaphragm)
Pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas)
Hepatitis
Pelvic inflammatory disease
Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's and colitis)
Heart attack

Various imaging techniques are helpful in determining the presence of kidney stones. The best approach uses spiral (or helical) computed tomography scans. If it is not available, the patient will need ultrasound or standard x-rays. If no stones show up, but the patient has severe pain that suggests the presence of kidney stones, the next step is an intravenous pyelogram.

X-Rays. A standard x-ray of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder may be a good first step for identifying many stones, since many are visible on x-rays. Calcium stones can be identified on x-rays by their white color. Cystine crystals can also show up on x-rays.

Spiral (or Helical) Computed Tomography. A type of computed tomography (CT) scan, called a spiral or helical CT scan, is currently the best method for diagnosing stones in either the kidneys or the ureters. This test is fast, does not require instruments or foreign chemicals to enter the body, and provides detailed accurate images of even very small stones. If stones are not present, a spiral CT scan can often identify other causes of pain in the kidney area. It is better than x-rays, ultrasound, and intravenous pyelogram -- the previous standard test for detecting kidney stones. Experts hope spiral CT will eventually be able to identify the chemicals present in a stone.

Ultrasound. Ultrasound can detect clear uric acid stones and obstruction in the urinary tract. It is not useful for finding very small stones, but some research indicates that it may be a useful first diagnostic step in the emergency room to help predict the likelihood of a stone, including suspected stones in children.

Intravenous Pyelogram. With intravenous pyelogram (IVP), the doctor injects a special dye into the patient. A technician will then take x-rays as the dye enters the kidneys and travels down the urinary tract. IVP is invasive but, until recently, was the most cost-effective method for detecting stones. Where it is available, spiral CT is now preferred, since it gives a faster diagnosis, is more accurate, is safer, and is similar in cost.

In any case, IVP should not be used on patients with kidney failure. There is also a risk for an allergic reaction to standard dyes, although newer less allergenic ones are becoming available.

In the procedure intravenous pyelogram (IVP), the patient is injected with dye. X-rays are taken as the dye travels through the urinary tract. This procedure is done to confirm the presence of kidney stones, although some stones may be too small to see.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are showing promise for diagnosing urinary tract obstruction but do not yet accurately reveal small stones, or ones that do not cause a blockage. Because no radiation is involved with MRI, however, it may prove to be a good option for pregnant women.

Urine samples are required to evaluate features of the urine, including its acidity and the presence of:

Red or white blood cells
Infection
Crystals
High or low levels of chemicals that inhibit or promote stone formation

Clean-Catch Urine Sample for Culturing. After determining that a kidney stone is present, the health care provider usually gives the patient a collection kit, including filters, to try to catch the stone or gravel as it passes out. The urine may also be tested (cultured) for the presence of infection-causing organisms. A clean-catch urine sample is almost always required for culturing. To provide a clean catch, do the following:

First, wash your hands thoroughly, then wash the penis or vulva and surrounding area four times with downward strokes, using a new soapy sponge each time.
Begin urinating into the toilet and stop after a few drops.
Position the container to catch the middle portion of the urine stream. Ideally, this urine will contain only the bacteria and other evidence of the stone.
Urinate the remainder into the toilet.
Tighten the cap on the container securely, being careful not to touch the inside of the rim.

Click the icon to see an image of a calcium urine test.

Twenty-Four Hour Urine Collection. A 24-hour urine collection may be needed to measure urine volume and levels of acidity, calcium, sodium, uric acid, oxalate, citrate, and creatinine.

You should not change any of your usual eating or drinking patterns when performing this test.
Discard the first urination on the day of the test.
Afterward all urine passed over the next 24 hours is collected, including the first urination on the morning of day two.
A second 24-hour urine collection may be needed to determine if treatment is working or if the first analysis was not conclusive and the doctor suspects a less common stone, such as a cystine or xanthine stone.

Click the icon to see an image of a uric acid urine test.

Urine tests that are used to determine the specific chemical and biological factors causing the stone should be performed about 6 weeks after the attack, since the attack itself may change the levels of such substances, including calcium, phosphate, and citrate. It should be noted that calcium levels in the urine may be abnormal even in many people without stones. In addition, high urinary concentrations of calcium may pose a greater or lesser risk depending on age. (In one 2001 study, middle-aged adults with high urinary calcium concentrations had a much greater risk than older adults with high levels.)

The kidney stones obtained from the urine sample are examined under a microscope. The crystal formations are often specific enough so that the doctor is able to identify the substance causing the stone.

Calcium oxalate crystals are eight-sided, while calcium phosphate crystals tend to have irregular shapes.
Uric acid stones are sometimes described as pear-shaped or diamond-shaped.
Some struvite stones have very specific shapes commonly described as "coffin lids." Struvite crystals may also occur in a formation known as a staghorn, which can be large and damaging to the kidney.

Testing whether urine is acidic or alkaline helps to identify the specific type of stone. The levels of acidity or alkalinity in any solution, including urine, are indicated by the pH scale:

A pH value of 7.0 is neutral.
A solution with a low pH (below 7.0) is acidic. (A low pH favors uric acid and cystine stones.)
A solution with a high pH is alkaline. (A high pH favors calcium phosphate and struvite stones.)

A dipstick test for blood in the urine (called hematuria) is typically performed when patients appear in the emergency room with flank pain (the primary symptom of kidney stones). About a third of kidney stone patients, however, do not show blood in the urine, so other tests may be needed.

Blood Tests for Stone Factors. Blood and urine tests help determine what substances form the crystals. This allows the doctor to determine the appropriate treatment and preventive measures.

Blood tests may help determine blood levels of urea nitrogen, creatinine, calcium, phosphate, and uric acid for patients with known or suspected calcium oxalate stones. Doctors will usually schedule these tests about 6 weeks after the attack, in order to measure these substances when the stone has been passed, and the patient has been stabilized. This is particularly true in patients with recurrent stones.

Parathyroid Tests. Tests to detect parathyroid hormone levels are given if the doctor suspects hyperparathyroidism, based on other signs and symptoms.

Tests for Infection. A test result that shows a high white blood cell count might indicate infection. Such results, however, could be misleading, since the number of white blood cells could also increase in response to the extreme physical stress of a kidney stone attack.

Tests for Metabolic Problems. About half of children with stones have an identifiable metabolic disorder, which increases their risk of stone recurrence five-fold. Experts argue whether tests for metabolic disorders are routinely needed once the stone composition has been determined. Studies suggest the following:

People with recurrent calcium stones have a wide range of irregular blood or urine test results, indicating a variety of possible metabolic disorders. For example, calcium stones in middle-aged women may be due to parathyroid abnormalities.
Calcium phosphate stones most likely result from renal tubular acidosis.
People with non-calcium stones generally have identifiable metabolic disorders.
Determining the stone composition may be sufficient for treatment, and may help avoid unnecessary metabolic tests.

Treatment

When tests show there is a kidney stone, the next step is to determine treatment. The patient should be admitted to the emergency room if they have severe vomiting, fever, or symptoms of infection.

Strong opioid painkillers, such as meperidine (Demerol), are often required for a severe kidney stone attack. However, doctors will usually not give such drugs until they confirm the presence of a kidney stone on an x-ray. In some cases, powerful nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may work just as well as opioids, and they have fewer side effects. However, they do take longer to work.

In about 85% of patients, the kidney stones are small enough that they pass through normal urination, usually within 2 to 3 days. In some cases, a stone may take weeks to months to pass, although pain usually goes away before that.

The patient should drink plenty of water (two to three quarts a day) to help move the stone along, and take painkillers as needed. The doctor usually provides a collection kit with a filter and asks the patient to save any passed stones for testing.

If the stone has not passed in 2 - 3 days, the patient will need additional treatments. In some severe cases, hospitalization may be necessary.

Specific procedures vary depending on the size of the stone or complexity of the situation. Noninvasive procedures are proving to be very beneficial in eliminating stones, and have largely replaced invasive surgeries.

For small stones that are lodged in the lower part of the ureter, ureteroscopy or shock wave lithotripsy are the procedures of choice.
For larger stones, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and shock wave lithotripsy are all potentially useful. The choice of any of these procedures depends on a number of factors, including location of the stone and the presence of any problems that caused the stone in the first place.
In some complicated cases, standard open surgical procedures (called nephrolithotomy) may be required.

See "Other Treatments" section for more information on kidney stone surgery.


Stone Type	Diet and Lifestyle	Medications	Procedures
Calcium Oxalate	Plenty of fluids. (Choose water, lemon juice. Avoid grapefruit, apple, and cranberry juice.) Limit the amount of protein and salt in the diet. Increase fiber. Limit the amount of fats in the diet, particularly in people who have short bowel syndrome. Balance normal calcium intake with potassium- and phosphate-rich foods. Limit the amount of calcium in the diet (only in people who have genetic abnormalities that cause high intestinal absorption of calcium). Limit the amount of foods high in oxalates (only in patients with rare intestinal conditions that cause hyperoxaluria).	Diuretics ("water pills"), Citrate salts, phosphates, cholestyramine.	Lithotripsy, uteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, open surgery.
Uric Acid	Plenty of fluids. (Choose water, blackcurrant juice. Avoid cranberry juice.) Increase calcium intake (be sure well-balanced with potassium and phosphates). Reduce protein and other foods with high-purine content.	Potassium citrate, sodium bicarbonate, allopurinol.	Lithotripsy, uteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, open surgery.
Struvite stones	Plenty of fluids (water, cranberry juice). Reduce proteins.	Antibiotics to eliminate any infection. Acetohydroxamic acid (AHA) may be helpful in combination with antibiotics. In some cases, organic acids given through urinary tract.	May respond poorly to most lithotripsy procedures and require open surgery. Newer procedures may be helpful.
Cystine stones	Very high fluid intake (four quarts a day). Limit the amount of protein in the diet.	Alkalizing agents (such as bicarbonate). Sometimes d-penicillamine, tiopronine, or captopril useful for lowering cystine levels.	May respond poorly to most lithotripsy procedures and require open surgery. Newer procedures may be helpful.

Medications

Diuretics. Diuretics are medicines commonly used to treat high blood pressure and other disorders. They remove fluid and sodium from the body. Low doses of a class of diuretics known as thiazides are sometimes used to reduce the amount of calcium released by the kidneys into the urine. Thiazides include:

Hydrochlorothiazide (Esidrix, HydroDiuril)
Chlorothiazide (Diuril)
Trichlormethiazide (Metahydrin, Naqua)
Chlorthalidone (Hygroton)

However, thiazides also cause potassium loss, which reduces citrate levels and can increase the risk for stones. Patients taking thiazide pills should also take potassium citrate, to prevent citrate loss. Amiloride (Midamor) is a potassium-sparing diuretic, which may be used if a thiazide does not work.

Citrates. Citrate salts are often given to people with calcium oxalate or uric acid stones:

Potassium magnesium citrate is available over the counter. It is proving to be very beneficial in preventing kidney stones. In one study, potassium magnesium citrate reduced the risk for kidney stone recurrence by 85%.
Potassium citrate (K-Lyte, Polycitra-K, Urocit-K) is given as the only treatment to people with normal urine calcium levels. Between 70 - 75% of patients with recurrent stones have ongoing remission (no stone recurrence) with potassium citrate treatment. However, some people cannot tolerate potassium citrate because of side effects (stomach problems).
Magnesium citrate (Citroma, Citro-Nesia) may help people who develop calcium stones from impaired intestinal absorption due to short bowel disease.

None of these products should be used by people with struvite stones, urinary tract infections, bleeding disorders, or kidney damage. Patients who take citrate supplements containing potassium should not take any other medications that either contain this mineral or prevent its loss (such as so-called potassium-sparing diuretics). People with peptic ulcers should avoid citrate supplements, or discuss using non-tablet forms with their doctor.

Phosphates. Phosphates help reduce the breakdown of bone that releases calcium into the bloodstream. They are also involved in the kidney's reabsorption of calcium from the urine.

Phosphate compounds:

Neutral (nonacidic) sodium or potassium phosphate (K-Phos, Neutral, Neutra-Phos) is usually taken four times a day after meals to prevent kidney stones unless otherwise directed by the doctor. Diarrhea is a possible side effect.
Cellulose phosphate (Calcibind) is recommended only for severe hypercalciuria that is associated with recurrent calcium stones and is caused by excessive absorption of calcium from the intestines. However, this drug may increase oxalate levels and decrease magnesium levels, which can lead to different stones. Taking magnesium supplements and reducing dietary oxalates, calcium, and ascorbic acid may help offset these risks. Cellulose phosphate may also cause bloating.

Avoid acidic forms of phosphate, since they increase the risks for both hypocitraturia and hypercalciuria.

Cholestyramine (Questran, Questran Light) is a drug used to reduce cholesterol levels. However, it also binds with oxalate in the intestine, so it is also used to reduce high oxalate levels in urine (hyperoxaluria). The drug usually comes in a powder that is dissolved in liquid.

Bloating and constipation are common side effects of this drug. Cholestyramine also interferes with other medications, including digoxin (Lanoxin) and warfarin, and may contribute to calcium loss and osteoporosis. In order to prevent such interactions, take other drugs 1 hour before, or 4 - 6 hours after, taking cholestyramine.

Long-term use of cholestyramine may cause deficiencies of vitamins A, D, E, and K. Vitamin supplements may be necessary.

Sodium Bicarbonate. Patients whose persistently acidic urine causes uric acid stones may take sodium bicarbonate to reduce urine acidity. Patients taking sodium bicarbonate must test their urine regularly with pH paper, which turns different colors depending on whether the urine is acidic or alkaline. Too much sodium bicarbonate can cause the urine to become too alkaline. This increases the risk for calcium phosphate stones. Patients who need to reduce the amount of sodium they take in (as a result of other medical conditions) should not use sodium bicarbonate.

Potassium Citrate. Potassium citrate, which restores citrate to the urine, is useful for patients with high levels of uric acid in the urine.

Allopurinol. Allopurinol (Lupurin, Zyloprim) is very effective in reducing high levels of uric acid, and may be helpful for patients with uric acid stones. Allopurinol will not prevent calcium stones from forming. There is also a slight risk for the formation of xanthine stones with this drug. Side effects include diarrhea, headache, and fever. More severe complications include blood disorders that may produce fatigue, bleeding, or bruising. The drug may also increase the risk for cataracts.

About 2% of patients experience an allergic reaction to allopurinol that causes a rash. In rare cases, the rash can become severe and widespread enough to be life threatening. Allergic individuals who have experienced only a mild rash to sodium bicarbonate may be able to build up their tolerance for allopurinol by undergoing a desensitization process. In this process, patients start with small doses of allopurinol and gradually increase them, if no reaction develops.

Allopurinol reduces uric acid levels rapidly, so it may trigger an attack of gout in vulnerable people. To prevent this problem, patients taking allopurinol should also take a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for 2 or 3 months. Aspirin should not be taken, since it increases uric acid levels. Patients should discuss the appropriate NSAID choice with their doctor.

Before patients can receive any medical treatment for struvite stones, they must have surgery to completely remove the stones.

Antibiotics for Eliminating Infection. Persons with struvite stones receive ongoing treatment with antibiotics to keep the urine free of the bacteria that cause urinary tract infections. Careful follow-up and urine testing is extremely important. A high-pH urine indicates low acidity and an increased risk of infection.

Acetohydroxamic Acid (AHA). Acetohydroxamic acid (AHA or Lithostat) is beneficial when used with long-term antibiotics. AHA blocks enzymes that bacteria release, and has been effective in preventing stones even when bacteria are present. Side effects, however, can be severe. The drug reduces iron levels in the body, so anemia is a common problem. Patients may need to take iron supplements. Other side effects include nausea, vomiting, depression, anxiety, rash, persistent headache, and, rarely, small blood clots in the legs.

Experts recommend this drug only for patients with healthy kidneys who have chronic diseases caused by specific struvite-causing organisms.

Patients taking this medicine should avoid alcohol. Pregnant women should not take acetohydroxamic acid.

Organic Acids. Medical treatments to dissolve stones may be useful in patients who do not respond to other medications, or in combination with surgeries. Acidic urine dissolves struvite stones, so the doctor may wash the urinary tract with a solution of organic acids (such as Renacidin). Candidates for such washes must have sterile urine (no bacteria or other organisms in the urine) and healthy kidney function. In surgical patients, the wash is performed 4 or 5 days after the operation. The wash starts with saline (salt solution) for 1 - 2 days and, if there are no problems, the organic acid solution follows for another 1 or 2 days, until all stones dissolve. Regular urine tests are necessary to ensure that the bacteria do not return.

Aluminum Hydroxide Gel. An aluminum hydroxide anti-acid gel may reduce phosphate levels that are important in struvite stone formation, but it has a long-term risk of causing aluminum toxicity. Long-term reduction of phosphorus can also increase the risk for calcium oxalate stones. Experts recommend limiting phosphorus through a low-protein diet, rather than through the use of this gel.

The first-line treatment for cystine stones is increasing the alkalization of urine so the stones can dissolve. If alkalization fails, drug treatments may include d-penicillamine, alpha-mercaptopropionylglycine (tiopronine), or captopril. These medications lower cystine concentration.

Patients with cystine stones must drink plenty of fluids, much more than patients with other stones. The patients should drink at least four quarts of water over a 24-hour period.

Other Treatments

Surgery is usually needed if the stone is too large to pass on its own, if there are signs that the stone is growing, or if the stone is blocking the urine flow and causing a urinary tract infection or kidney damage.

Until recently, the procedure to remove a stone was a very painful, major surgery, requiring 4-6 weeks of recovery. Today, treatments for stones are much less invasive. Major surgery is performed in less than 2% of patients.

Stone removal procedures:

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is used for small stones (less than one centimeter, or slightly less than half an inch) that occur in the upper part of the ureter and do not pass on their own. One study indicated lithotripsy might even be safe and effective for patients whose stones are associated with malformed kidneys, although such patients are at higher risk for stone recurrence and should be carefully monitored.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). PNL can be used for very large stones in the upper urinary tract, when ESWL fails, for kidney transplant patients, or when the kidneys or surrounding areas are malformed. PNL is the preferred procedure for drug-resistant cystine stones, which are usually also resistant to shock wave therapy.
Ureteroscopy. For stones in the lower tract, ureteroscopy is generally the best procedure, although lithotripsy is also usually feasible and patients ordinarily prefer it.
Standard open surgery (nephrolithotomy) may be required if any of these procedures fail or are not appropriate, or in special cases, such as when the patient is very obese.

Most procedures are more effective for calcium and uric acid stones and less effective for struvite and cystine stones, although new techniques may be improving their effects on all stones.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a technique that uses sound waves (ultrasound) to break up simple stones in the kidney or upper urinary tract. ("Extracorporeal" means "outside the body," and "lithotripsy" means stone-breaking.) ESWL is not used for cystine stones. The procedure generally does not work for stones larger than three centimeters in diameter (which is slightly over an inch). There are several variations of ESWL. The following is a typical procedure:

Most ESWL procedures use some anesthesia, although they are often done on an outpatient basis.
The patient is positioned in a water bath. (In some procedures the patient lies on a soft cushion.)
The procedure uses ultrasound to generate shock waves that travel through the skin and body tissues until they hit the dense stones. (The doctor pinpoints the stone during treatment by using x-rays or ultrasound.)
The shock waves crush the stones into tiny sand-like pieces that usually pass easily through the urinary tract.
The shattered stone fragments may cause discomfort as they pass through the urinary tract. In such cases, the doctor may insert a small tube called a stent through the bladder into the ureter to help the fragments pass. This practice, however, has not proved to speed up passage of the stones in most cases and is not used routinely.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a procedure used to shatter simple stones in the kidney or upper urinary tract. Ultrasonic waves are passed through the body until they strike the dense stones. Pulses of sonic waves pulverize the stones, which are then more easily passed through the ureter and out of the body in the urine.

Success rates of ESWL range from 50 - 90%, depending on the location of the stone and the surgeon's technique and level of experience. Recovery time is short, and most people can resume normal activities in a few days.

Complications. Complications may include the following:

The most common complication is blood in the urine, which lasts for a few days after treatment. To reduce the chances of bleeding, doctors usually tell patients to avoid taking aspirin and other NSAIDs, which can promote bleeding, for 7 - 10 days before the treatment.
Bruising and minor discomfort due to the shock waves are common in the back or abdomen.
Sometimes the stone does not completely break up with one treatment, and additional treatments may be required. Inability to pass stone fragments may also be a particular problem in patients who have cysts or other kidney problems.
Higher risk for diabetes later. A 2006 study published in the journal Urology found that 17% of patients who received shock-wave lithotripsy developed diabetes later in life. The diabetes risk was related to the number and intensity of shocks.
Higher risk for hypertension (high blood pressure). The same study that linked ESWL to diabetes also showed that people who received shock-wave lithotripsy treatment were 47% more likely to develop high blood pressure than those who had their stones treated without surgery.

ESWL appears to be safe for children, although a 2001 study reported temporary damage in the kidney tubules after treatment. It is unclear if this complication has any long-term consequences. Experts recommend using the least amount of shocks and impact possible in young people. If more than one treatment is needed, there should be a waiting period of at least 15 days between treatments.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy may be used when ESWL is not available or effective (such as if the stone is very large, in an inaccessible location, or is a cystine stone). It is also preferred over ESWL for stones that have remained in the ureter for more than 4 weeks.

It is more effective than ESWL for patients with severe obesity, and appears to be safe for the very elderly and the very young. Success rates are nearly 98% for kidney stones and 88% for ureteral stones. They may vary by the technique used and the specific patients. For example, success rates are slightly lower in children, although the procedure can be done safely in young patients. Long-term effects are unknown.

A typical procedure is as follows:

The surgeon makes a tiny incision in the back and creates a tunnel directly into the kidney.
The surgeon then inserts an instrument called a nephroscope through the tunnel.
The stone is located and removed. If it is large, it is destroyed using ultrasound, lasers, or other devices. The surgeon then removes the fragments. An advantage of percutaneous nephrolithotomy over ESWL is that the surgeon is able to remove the stone fragments directly, instead of relying on their natural passage from the kidney.
Generally, patients stay in the hospital for 5 or 6 days and may need a small device called a nephrostomy tube left in the kidney during the healing process.

Devices Used to Destroy Stones. For large stones, some type of energy-delivering device may be needed to break the stone into small pieces. They are referred to as intracorporeal lithotripsy devices (meaning stone breakers within the body). The device may be one of the following:

Ultrasound is currently the preferred method. It results in a stone-free rate of 94%. A rigid nephroscope delivers the ultrasound waves.
Pneumatic (compressed air) lithotripsy uses a probe that comes in direct contract with a stone. Compressed air causes a piston to collide rapidly with the probe, and the result is a "jackhammer" action against the stone, causing the stone to break up. This method, however, can send stone fragments into other parts of the urinary tract.
A more recent device uses a combination pneumatic probe and ultrasound, with stone-free rates of 80 - 89%. It may prove to be superior to ultrasound alone and be effective against stones of all types.
The holmium laser literally melts the stones and destroys up to 100% of stones of any composition. It uses a flexible nephroscope and has an excellent safety record. It should be used sparingly, however, with particular caution against large uric acid stones until more is understood about its effect. Another device, the erbium: YAG laser, although showing promise in lithotripsy, is not currently practical.

Complications. Complication rates are about 3%. Major complications occur in about 1% of cases. These complications may include scarring of the tissue, but studies indicate that it does not impair kidney function, even if the patient requires repeat surgery. There is also a risk for blood loss during and after the procedure, which, in some cases, can be significant.

Because the procedure requires large volumes of fluid, fluid overload is a potential problem, particularly in children or patients with heart disease.

In some cases, infection may result. Other complications may include a collapsed lung and injuries to areas outside the kidney (but within the operative area), such as the abdomen or chest.

Ureteroscopy may be used for stones in the middle and lower ureter. With the arrival of smaller instruments, this procedure can be done successfully in children as well. The procedure involves the following:

The patient receives a general anesthetic, though no incision is required for the procedure.
The surgeon passes a small fiberoptic instrument called a ureteroscope through the urethra and bladder into the ureter.
The surgeon locates the stone or stones.
The surgeon can remove smaller stones by grasping them with small forceps. A laser or pneumatic device breaks up large stones.
The surgeon may decide to leave a small tube, or stent, in the ureter for a few days after treatment, to help the lining of the ureter heal.

Complication rates range from 10 - 20%, with major problems occurring in up to 6% of patients. In some cases, large stones are not broken up into small enough pieces. This can result in blockage of the urinary tract and possible kidney damage.

Imaging tests, such as ultrasound or spiral CT, are useful within 3 months to check for residual stones, and a second procedure may be required. The risk of complications is highest when the procedure is performed by less experienced surgeons, or if stones are found in the kidney. The risk for perforation of the ureter increases the longer the procedure takes.

Open surgery involves incisions through the patient's flank and into the kidney. The surgeon will cool the kidneys using ice. X-rays during the procedure help locate the stone. At the beginning of the surgery, the surgeon will isolate the arteries supplying the kidneys, ensuring they are not harmed during the surgery. The surgeon will then locate and remove the stone. The surgeon will also correct any blockage in the affected area. The surgery, called nephrolithotomy, is very invasive and is restricted to the following:

Patients with very large or complex stones that cannot be removed using less invasive measures
Very obese patients

Some centers report success with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, however, in patients who would normally be nephrolithotomy candidates. Therefore, even these patients should discuss other options with their surgeon.

The procedure is not appropriate for patients with:

Bleeding or clotting disorders
Untreated widespread infection
Severe and chronic kidney insufficiency (unless removing the stone will improve kidney function)

Complications

Between 70 - 90% of crystals remain tiny enough so that they can travel through the urinary tract and leave the body in the urine without being noticed. When they do cause symptoms, however, kidney stones have been described as one of the most painful disorders to afflict humans. The pain they cause is sometimes called renal colic. ("Renal" means "kidney.")

Obstruction and Infection. Although kidney stones often lead to obstruction (blockage) of the urinary tract, the blockage is usually temporary and causes no lasting damage. In some cases, however, particularly if the obstruction progresses with no symptoms, infection may occur, which can be serious and need immediate attention.

Kidney Failure. It is very rare for kidney stones to cause kidney failure, although some people have risk factors that make them more vulnerable to this serious complication. Risk factors include the following:

Very frequent recurrences (such as in people with cystine stones or other inherited forms of kidney stone disorders)
Accompanying episodes of urinary tract infections with obstruction, a particular risk with struvite stones
A history of multiple urologic procedures for kidney stones
Greater size of the kidney stone gravel

Without preventive treatment, calcium stones recur in 10% of patients within a year of the first attack, and in half of patients within 5 - 7 years. Individual risk for recurrence, however, varies depending on the stone and the underlying condition. For example, a 15-year-old with inherited cystine stones has a very high risk for recurrence, while a middle-aged man with a first calcium oxalate stone has a good chance of never passing another.

Prevention

All individuals who have experienced kidney stones should take some specific preventive measures to prevent recurrence. The following are some general observations:

The most important dietary recommendations for reducing the risk for calcium stones are increasing fluid intake, restricting sodium, and reducing protein intake.
A lower risk for calcium stones is also associated with higher potassium intake.
A high calcium diet does not appear to increase the risk for kidney stones as long as it also contains plenty of fluids and dietary potassium and phosphate. (Increasing calcium alone may pose a modest risk for stones.)
Patients should try to correct any dietary habits that cause acidic or alkaline imbalances in the urine, which promote stone formation.

Because different kidney stone types may require specific dietary changes, patients should work with their doctors to develop an individualized plan. It is important to note that nutritional considerations are very important in preventing recurrence, and patients should be vigilant in complying with the proper diet.

Good voiding habits, particularly frequent urination, are important. Therefore, of all the preventive recommendations, drinking enough fluids is the most important guideline for people with any type of kidney stones.

In general, patients with calcium or uric acid stones should drink at least 10 full glasses of fluid each day (at least half should be water). This includes one with each meal and drinking fluids at night, even if it means getting up from sleep. Fluid intake should produce at least two and a half quarts of urine each day.
To prevent cystine stones, patients should drink even more water -- over a gallon, or 16 8-ounce cups, every day. Patients should drink this amount at regular intervals throughout the night and day.

In all cases, patients need more fluid after exertion and during times of stress. If they drink enough, the urine should be pale and almost watery, not dark and yellow.

Water. Although water is best, it may vary depending on its source. Variations in water itself may have different impacts. One study reported that drinking hard tap water increased urinary calcium concentration by 50% compared to soft bottled water. On the other hand, mineral water containing both calcium and magnesium may reduce several risk factors for both calcium and uric acid stone formation.

Juices and Specific Effects. Other beverages have various positive or negative effects, depending on the type of stone:

Lemon Juice: Drinking one-half cup of pure lemon juice (enough to make eight glasses of lemonade) every day raises citrate levels in the urine, which might protect against calcium stones. (While orange juice also increases citrate levels, it does not lower calcium and it raises oxalate levels. Therefore, it is not recommended.)
Cranberry and Apple Juice: Apple and cranberry juice contain oxalates, and both have been associated with a higher risk for calcium oxalate stones. Cranberry juice has properties that may increase the risk for both calcium oxalate and uric acid stones. On the other hand, cranberry juice helps prevent urinary tract infections and so may be helpful for reducing the risk for struvite and brushite stones. (These stones are far less common, however.)
Black Currant Juice: In one study, black currant juice reduced urine acidity and was associated with protection against uric acid stones.
Grapefruit Juice: A number of studies have found a risk for stones from drinking grapefruit juice. In one study, just one 8-ounce cup of grapefruit juice per day increased the risk for forming stones by 44%.

Other Beverages and Their Effects on Stone Formation.

Soft Drinks. Patients with stones should avoid cola drinks, since they can severely reduce citrate levels in the urine. Many soft drinks contain phosphoric acid, which increases the risk for stones. Some research shows that drinking one quart (less than three 12-ounce cans) of soda per week may increase a person's risk of developing stones by 15%.
Alcohol. Wine may be protective against kidney stones. A study conducted in Finland, suggests that the risk of developing stones also decreases with beer consumption. However, it is important to remember that beer is high in oxalates. Beer and other alcoholic beverages also contain purines, which may increase the specific risk for the less common uric acid stones in susceptible people. Binge drinking, in any case, increases uric acid and the risk for stones.
Coffee and Tea. Some research reported a lower risk for stones in people who drink tea and both regular and decaffeinated coffee.

A long-term 2002 study followed men with calcium oxalate stones and high levels of urinary calcium. The study found that a low-sodium, low-protein diet, containing normal levels of calcium, dramatically reduced the recurrence of stones compared to a diet that was simply low in calcium.

Salt Restriction. Because salt intake increases the amount of calcium in urine, patients with calcium stones should limit their sodium intake. Sodium may also increase levels of urate, the crystalline substance that can trigger formation of recurrent calcium oxalate stones. Although the relative contribution of limiting sodium intake has not been confirmed, some researchers believe that restricting sodium along with increasing fluid intake is the most important dietary measure for preventing stones.

Protein Restriction. Protein increases uric acid, calcium, and oxalate levels in the urine, and reduces citrate levels. Diets high in protein, particularly meat protein, have been consistently connected with kidney stones. (Meat protein has a higher sulfur content and produces more acid than vegetable protein.) A 2002 study of those following a high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet (such as the Atkins diet, for example), found dramatically increased levels of urinary uric acid and calcium after just several weeks. These effects put patients at higher risk for not just kidney stones, but possibly osteoporosis as well. According to Swiss studies, about a third of people at risk for calcium stones may have a sensitivity to meat proteins that causes mild hyperoxaluria.

Whether restricting meat protein alone has any protective value without restricting sodium as well is unknown. Most studies to date have found no difference in stone development between people with low and normal meat protein diets over four years. A 2000 study reported that only dramatic reductions in meat protein had any preventive effect against stone recurrence.

Although the precise role of dietary protein in kidney stones needs further clarification, it is reasonable for everyone to consume meat protein in moderation. People with struvite stones, who need to reduce phosphates in their diets, should also cut down on proteins.

Calcium from Foods. Dietary calcium recommendations for kidney stone prevention need to be determined on an individual basis. A doctor will suggest calcium guidelines based on a patient's age, gender, body size, and type of stone. Most studies indicate that dietary calcium (found in milk, yogurt, and cheese) protects against many types of calcium oxalate stones. Large studies of both men and women found that those with the highest intake of calcium from foods had a much lower risk for stones than those who had little calcium in their diets. A diet containing a normal amount of calcium, but reduced amounts of animal protein and salt, may protect against stones better than a low-calcium regimen. However, calcium metabolism changes as people age. Some studies suggest that a high calcium intake protects against kidney stones in men younger than age 60, but not in older men.

Dietary calcium may actually bind the oxalate in foods, preventing it from being absorbed into the blood and excreted into the urine. In a normal healthy diet, dairy products supply almost 80% of the daily calcium requirement. For people who have calcium stones associated with resorption (the breakdown of bone that releases calcium into the bloodstream), limiting calcium intake could cause further bone loss.

Calcium Supplements. Evidence on calcium supplements is mixed, although in general many studies suggest that they reduce oxalate levels and so help prevent calcium oxalate stones. One study suggested that taking 500 mg of calcium supplements a day regularly may "reprogram" the intestines to absorb less calcium and may therefore be protective. Experts generally agree that calcium supplementation within dosage recommendations (about 1,200 mg per day) remains safe. In one study, however, women who took calcium supplements had a 20% higher risk for stones. Research indicates that dosages of calcium above 2,000 mg per day are clearly associated with the formation of stones. Some experts speculate that this higher risk may occur because supplements are often taken in the morning, either without food or with breakfast, which is typically low in oxalates. Taking supplements with later meals may not produce the same risk.

Calcium Restriction in Certain Cases. Some patients, such as those whose stones are caused by genetic defects in which the intestine absorbs too much calcium, may need to limit calcium intake. More studies are needed to define this group precisely.

Fiber may be beneficial for people with kidney stones. In addition, some fiber-rich foods may contain compounds that help protect against kidney stones. A wide variety of high-fiber plant foods contain a compound called phytate (also called inositol hexaphosphate, InsP6, or IP6), which appears to help prevent crystallization of calcium salts, both oxalate and phosphate. Phytate is found in legumes and wheat and rice bran. (Soybeans are also rich in phytate but they are also very high in oxalates, so the overall effects of soy on kidney stones are not clear.)

A high intake of purines can increase the amount of uric acid in the urine. Those at risk for uric acid stones should reduce their intake of foods and beverages that contain purines. These include beer and other alcoholic beverages, anchovies, sardines, yeast, organ meats (such as liver and kidneys), legumes (including dried beans, peas, and soybeans), mushrooms, spinach, asparagus, cauliflower, and poultry.

Most people with calcium oxalate stones should not avoid oxalate-rich foods unless the doctor specifically recommends a restrictive diet. Oxalate binds with calcium in the intestine, which may actually reduce calcium absorption. Some studies, in fact, indicate that eating foods containing oxalates and calcium together may reduce the risk of stones. Most of the foods that contain oxalates are very important for good health. Limiting oxalates may be particularly harmful in people with bowel disorders marked by malabsorption.

Foods high in oxalic acid include beets, soy, beet tops, black tea, chenopodium, chocolate, cocoa, dried figs, ground pepper, lamb, lime peel, nuts, parsley, poppy seeds, purslane, rhubarb, sorrel, spinach, and Swiss chard.
Foods containing moderate amounts of oxalates include beans (green and wax), blackberries, blueberries, carrots, celery, coffee (roasted), concord grapes, currants, dandelion greens, endive, gooseberries, lemon peel, okra, green onions, oranges, green peppers, black raspberries, strawberries, and sweet potatoes.

Certain fats may play a beneficial or harmful role in specific cases of kidney stones.

Restricted Fats in Patients with Stones Associated with Bowel Disease. Patients who have stones associated with short-bowel syndrome should eat foods with lower amounts of fats and oxalates. If patients with short-bowel syndrome eat too much fat, calcium may bind to unabsorbed fat instead of to oxalates. This increased oxalate levels, resulting in increased risk of stone formation.

Fish Oil. Omega-3 fatty acids, found in oily fish like mackerel, salmon, and albacore tuna, have many health benefits, but the most current evidence suggests they do not help prevent kidney stones. A 2005 study of over 200,000 adults found that increased omega-3 fatty acid intake did not reduce kidney stone risk.

Vitamin B6. Vitamin B6, or pyridoxine, is used to treat people with primary hyperoxaluria, a severe inherited disorder. Patients should not try to treat themselves with vitamin B6. Very high doses (500 to 2,000 mg daily over long periods) can cause nerve damage, with loss of balance and numbness in the feet and hands. Food sources of vitamin B6 include meats, oily fish, poultry, whole grains, dried fortified cereals, soybeans, avocados, baked potatoes with skins, watermelon, plantains, bananas, peanuts, and brewer's yeast.

Vitamin C. Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) may change in the body to tiny crystals, called oxalates. These crystals do not dissolve. People with hyperoxaluria (too much oxalate in the urine) should avoid vitamin C supplements. Even for men with normal oxalate levels, higher consumption of vitamin C (more than 1,000 mg a day) may increase kidney stone risk.

Magnesium and potassium may help reduce the risk for kidney stones in men.

Because of an association between stress and kidney stones, relaxation and stress management techniques may also be beneficial.

Dietary Considerations. People with kidney stones appear to be more sensitive to certain foods than people who do not form kidney stones. Therefore, vulnerable people should make specific changes in their diet. They should work with their doctors to develop a dietary plan that fits their individual situation. Drinking plenty of fluids is important for preventing recurrence of any kidney stone.

Indications for Drug Treatments. If dietary treatments fail, drug therapy may be helpful. A number of drugs are available to prevent recurrences of calcium oxalate and other stones. Medications that inhibit the formation of stones include allopurinol, thiazide, potassium citrate, and potassium-magnesium citrate. In addition, drug treatments can sometimes also help prevent other complications related to stones, such as osteoporosis.

Correcting Underlying Conditions Known to Cause Kidney Stones. It is also important to treat and correct, if possible, any underlying disorder that may be causing stones to form. Such disorders include distal renal tubular acidosis, hyperthyroidism, sarcoidosis, and certain cancers. To prevent calcium stones that form in hyperparathyroid patients, a surgeon may remove the affected parathyroid gland (located in the neck). In most cases, only one of the glands is enlarged. Removing it ends the patient's problem with kidney stones.

Resources

www.kidney.niddk.nih.gov -- National Kidney and Urologic Diseases Information Clearinghouse
www.urologyhealth.org -- American Urological Association
www.kidney.org -- National Kidney Foundation
www.ohf.org -- Oxalosis and Hyperoxaluria Foundation

References

Cameron MA, Maalouf NM, Adams-Huet B, Moe OW, Sakhaee K. Urine composition in type 2 diabetes: predisposition to uric Acid nephrolithiasis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 May;17(5):1422-8. Epub 2006 Apr 5.

Curhan GC, Willett WC, Knight EL, Stampfer MJ. Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in younger women: Nurses' Health Study II. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(:885-891.

Finkielstein VA. Strategies for preventing calcium oxalate stones. CMAJ. 2006;174(10); 1407-1409.

Krambeck AE, Gettman MT, Rohlinger AL, Lohse CM, Patterson DE, Segura JW. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup. J Urol. 2006;175(5):1742-7.

Sinha MK, Collazo-Clavell ML, Rule A, et al. Hyperoxaluric nephrolithiasis is a complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Kidney International. 2007;72:100-107.

Straub M, Hautmann RE. Developments in stone prevention. Curr Opin Urol. 2005;15(2):119-126.

Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in men: new insights after 14 years of follow-up. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(12):3225-3232.

Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Fatty acid intake and incident nephrolithiasis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45(2):267-274.

Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA. 2005;293(4):455-462.

Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 2005 Sep;68(3):1230-5.

Wasserstein AG. Nephrolithiasis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 45(2);2005:422-28.

Review Date:
7/24/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Coronary artery disease

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:07 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Prognosis
Risk Factors
Diagnosis
Managing Heart Disease
Anti-Clotting Medications...
Other Medications
Surgery
Coronary Artery Bypass Graf...
Angioplasty and Stents
Other Treatments
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Angioplasty Versus Drugs

Angioplasty works no better than drug therapy (high blood pressure, cholesterol, anti-platelet, and other medication) in preventing heart attack and stroke in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), according to an important New England Journal of Medicine study. Experts still recommend angioplasty for patients with unstable or severe CAD.

Stents

Stents coated with drugs may have a slightly higher risk of causing blood clots than bare metal stents, according to FDA meetings held in late 2006. Researchers still need to conduct more research before reaching final conclusions.
Drug-coated stents work well when they are used for patients with specific types of heart conditions, indicate several studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine. However, problems may develop when these stents are used for “off-label” purposes. Experts are also concerned that both bare metal and drug-coated stents may be used too frequently.
Patients who receive a drug-coated stent must take both aspirin and an anti-platelet thienopyridine drug (usually clopidogrel) for at least 1 year after the stent is inserted, advises an important statement from the American Heart Association. Patients who cannot take a thienopyridine drug should receive a bare metal stent instead of a drug-coated stent.

Anti-Bleeding Drugs for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CAGB)

Aprotinin (Trasylol), a drug used to control bleeding during CABG, is more dangerous than other types of anti-bleeding drugs, according to a 2007 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Many experts now recommend against its use.

Diagnosis

Blood tests for biomarkers do not provide much more predictive information than standard disease risk factors, suggest several recent studies. In a 2006 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers found that risk factors such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes are still the best methods for predicting the likelihood of heart disease and heart-related death.

Introduction

The heart is the human body's hardest working organ. Throughout life it continuously pumps blood enriched with oxygen and vital nutrients through a network of arteries to all parts of the body's tissues.

The external structures of the heart include the ventricles, atria, arteries, and veins. Arteries carry blood away from the heart while veins carry blood into the heart. The vessels colored blue indicate the transport of blood with relatively low content of oxygen and high content of carbon dioxide. The vessels colored red indicate the transport of blood with relatively high content of oxygen and low content of carbon dioxide.

In order to perform the difficult task of pumping blood to the rest of the body, the heart muscle itself needs a plentiful supply of oxygen-rich blood, which is provided through a network of coronary arteries. These arteries carry oxygen-rich blood to the heart's muscular walls (the myocardium).

Click the icon to see an image of the anterior heart arteries.

If blood flow to the myocardium is interrupted, an injury known as an infarct occurs. This is also known as myocardial infarction or, more commonly, a heart attack.

Click the icon to see an animation about coronary artery disease.

Coronary artery disease is the end result of a complex process called atherosclerosis (commonly called "hardening of the arteries"). This causes blockage of arteries (ischemia ) and prevents oxygen-rich blood from reaching the heart. There are many steps in the process leading to atherosclerosis, some not fully understood.

Click the icon to see an image of atherosclerosis.

Increasingly, however, researchers are studying the interactions between cholesterol and processes known as oxidation and the inflammatory response.

Cholesterol and Lipoproteins. The story begins with cholesterol and sphere-shaped bodies called lipoproteins that transport cholesterol.

Cholesterol is a white, crystalline substance that is found in all animal cells and in animal-based foods. It is critical for many functions, but under certain conditions cholesterol can have harmful effects.
The lipoproteins that transport cholesterol are referred to by their size. The most commonly known are low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and high density lipoproteins (HDL). LDL is often referred to as the "bad" cholesterol and HDL as the "good" cholesterol.

Click the icon to see an image of cholesterol inside an artery.

Oxidation. The damaging process called oxidation is an important trigger in the atherosclerosis story.

Oxidation is a chemical process in the body caused by the release of unstable particles known as oxygen-free radicals. It is one of the normal processes in the body, but under certain conditions (such as exposure to cigarette smoke or other environment stresses) these free radicals are overproduced.
In excess amounts, they can be very dangerous, causing damaging inflammation and even affecting genetic material in cells.
In heart disease, free radicals are released in artery linings and oxidize low-density lipoproteins (LDL). The oxidized LDL is the basis for cholesterol build-up on the artery walls and damage leading to heart disease.

Inflammatory Response. For the arteries to harden there must be a persistent reaction in the body that causes ongoing harm. Researchers now believe that this reaction is an immune process known as the inflammatory response. The following is one theory about how the inflammatory response contributes to heart disease:

The injuries to the arteries during oxidation signal the immune system to release white blood cells (particularly those called neutrophils and macrophages) at the site. These factors initiate the inflammatory response.
Macrophages literally "eat" foreign debris, in this case oxidized LDL cholesterol.
The process converts LDL cholesterol into foamy material that attaches to the smooth muscle cells of the arteries. The cholesterol becomes mushy and accumulates on artery walls.
Over time the cholesterol dries and forms a hard plaque, which causes further injury to the walls of the arteries.
In response to this additional harm, the immune system releases other factors called cytokines. These are powerful inflammatory molecules that attract more white blood cells and perpetuate the whole cycle, causing persistent injury to the arteries.

Click the icon to see an image of atherosclerosis.

Evidence is growing that the inflammatory response may be present not only in local plaques in single arteries but also throughout the arteries leading to the heart.

Blockage in the Arteries. Eventually these calcified (hardened) arteries become narrower (a condition known as stenosis).

As this narrowing and hardening process continues, blood flow slows and prevents sufficient oxygen-rich blood from reaching the heart.
Such oxygen deprivation in vital cells is called ischemia. When it affects the coronary arteries, it causes injury to the tissues of the heart.
Injured inner vessel walls also fail to produce enough nitric oxide, a substance critical for maintaining blood vessel elasticity. (Nitric oxide has complex effects and may increase inflammation in the arteries.)
These narrow and inelastic arteries not only slow down blood flow but also become vulnerable to injury and tears.

Click the icon to see an image of coronary artery blockage

The End Result: Heart Attack. Heart attack can occur as a result of one or two effects of atherosclerosis.

(1) If the artery becomes completely blocked and ischemia becomes so extensive that oxygen-bearing tissues around the heart die.

(2) If the plaque itself develops fissures or tears. Blood platelets adhere to the site to seal off the plaque, and a blood clot (thrombus) forms. A heart attack can then occur if the formed blood clot completely blocks the passage of oxygen-rich blood to the heart.

Click the icon to see an image of the developmental process of atherosclerosis.

Angina is the primary symptom of coronary artery disease and, in severe cases, of a heart attack. It is typically experienced as chest pain and occurs when the heart muscle does not get as much blood (hence as much oxygen) as it needs for a given level of work (ischemia). Angina is usually referred to as one of two states:

Click the icon to see an image about angina.

Stable Angina (which is predictable)
Unstable Angina (which is less predictable and a sign of a more serious situation)

Angina itself is not a disease. Much evidence indicates that onset of angina less than 48 hours before a heart attack may be protective, possibly by conditioning the heart to resist the damage resulting from the attack. Angina may be experienced in different ways and can be mild, moderate, or severe.

Click the icon to see an image of angina.

Specific factors are typically considered in determining whether symptoms indicate angina:

Quality of the pain. Angina pain is typically described by patients as squeezing, heavy, suffocating, or griplike. It is rarely described as stabbing or burning. Changing one's position or breathing in and out does not affect the pain. The intensity of the pain does not always relate to the severity of the medical problem. Some people may feel a crushing pain from mild ischemia, while others might experience only mild discomfort from severe ischemia. In some cases, the patient experiences shortness of breath, fatigue, or palpitations instead of pain. In others, the ischemia is entirely asymptomatic ("silent ischemia").
Duration. A typical angina attack lasts minutes. If it is more fleeting or lasts for hours, it is probably not angina.
Location. Pain is usually in the chest under the breast bone. It often radiates to the neck, jaw, or left shoulder and arm. Less commonly, patients report symptoms that radiate to the right arm or back.
Triggers of Angina. Angina is usually triggered by physical exertion, emotional stress, or exposure to cold.
Factors that Relieve Angina. Angina is usually relieved by rest or by taking nitroglycerine under the tongue.

Stable Angina. Stable angina is predictable chest pain. Although less serious than unstable angina, it can be extremely painful. It is usually relieved by rest and responds well to medical treatment (typically nitroglycerin). Any event that increases oxygen demand can cause an angina attack. Some typical triggers include:

Exercise
Cold weather
Emotional tension
Large meals

Angina attacks can occur at any time during the day, but most occur between 6 a.m. and noon.

Unstable Angina and Acute Coronary Syndrome. Unstable angina is a much more serious situation and is often an intermediate stage between stable angina and a heart attack, in which an artery leading to the heart (a coronary artery) becomes completely blocked. A patient is usually diagnosed with unstable angina under one or more of the following conditions:

Pain awakens a patient or occurs during rest.
A patient who has never experienced angina has severe or moderate pain during mild exertion (walking two level blocks or climbing one flight of stairs).
Stable angina has progressed in severity and frequency within a 2-month period, and medications are less effective in relieving its pain.

Unstable angina is now usually discussed as part of a condition called acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ACS also includes people with a condition called NSTEMI (non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) -- also referred to as non-Q wave heart attack. With NSTEMI, the blood tests suggest a developing heart attack. These conditions are less severe than heart attacks but may develop into full-blown attacks without aggressive treatment. [See In-Depth Report #12: Heart attack and acute coronary syndrome.]

Prinzmetal's Angina. A third type of angina, called variant or Prinzmetal's angina, is caused by a spasm of a coronary artery. It almost always occurs when the patient is at rest. About two-thirds of people with it have severe atherosclerosis in at least one major blood vessel. Irregular heartbeats are common, but the pain is generally relieved immediately with standard treatment.

Click the icon to see an image of a coronary artery spasm.

Silent Ischemia. Some people with severe coronary artery disease do not experience angina pain. This condition is known as silent ischemia, which some experts attribute to abnormal processing of heart pain by the brain. This is a dangerous condition because patients have no warning signs of heart disease. Some studies suggest that people with silent ischemia experience higher complication and mortality rates than those with angina pain. (Angina pain may actually protect the heart by conditioning it before a heart attack.)

Syndrome X. Syndrome X is a condition that occurs when patients have atypical angina chest pain. Their electrocardiograms are abnormal during a stress test, but they have no signs of blocked arteries. It is more likely to occur in women. Although it unclear what causes this condition, imaging tests suggest that Syndrome X may also be caused by ischemia, as is angina.

Prognosis

According to a 2007 report, nearly 16 million Americans have coronary artery disease. In the U.S., coronary artery disease is the leading killer of both men and women. In 2004, nearly 500,000 people died because of CAD. On the positive side, heart attack mortality rates have been declining. Half of men and 63% of women who die of heart disease do not have angina or other warning symptoms prior to their fatal attacks. Although at this time no tests can reliably predict whether a heart attack will occur, experts estimate that up to 30% of fatal attacks and many follow-up surgeries could be avoided with healthy lifestyle changes and by sticking to medical treatments. Two-thirds of patients who have suffered a first heart attack, however, do not take the necessary steps to prevent another.

The following syndromes suggest different degrees of severity among patients with heart disease.

Stable Angina. This condition can usually be managed with lifestyle measures and medications, such as low-dose aspirin. The more severe the angina, however, the greater the chance for progressing to a more serious condition.

Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS). ACS includes severe and sudden heart conditions that require aggressive treatment but have not developed into a full-blown heart attack. ACS refers to either unstable angina or NSTEMI (non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction). NSTEMI is also known as non Q-wave myocardial infarction.

Angina is a specific type of pain in the chest caused by inadequate blood flow through the blood vessels (coronary vessels) of the heart muscle (myocardium).

Unstable angina is potentially serious and chest pain is persistent, but blood tests do not show markers for heart attack.
With NSTEMI, the blood tests suggest a developing heart attack, but, most likely, injury in the arteries is less serious than with a full-blown heart attack.

Most discussions of the treatment of unstable angina now refer to acute coronary syndrome. Doctors use the presence of a number of factors to help predict which ACS patients are most at risk for developing a heart attack.

First, patients are categorized by whether they have a history of heart disease or risk factors for heart disease (such as diabetes, high blood pressure, peripheral artery disease) or other complicating conditions (such as lung disease, heart failure). The doctor also evaluates the severity of the angina. Other factors that pose a high risk for ACS include:

Age 65 years or older
Evidence of severe heart tissue injury
Having a lighter weight
Having a history of severe chronic angina
Having abnormal lung sounds called rales (a bubbling or crackling sound) on examination
ST-segment deviation
Having either very slow or very fast heat beats
Having very low blood pressure

Heart Attack. A full-blown heart attack occurs with severe damage to the heart, which blocks oxygen.

ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THEY ARE HAVING A HEART ATTACK SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CALL THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEM (911 IN THE UNITED STATES).

People with known heart disease and any unusual chest pain or other symptoms of heart attack that do not clear up with medications should go to the hospital. The degree of pain and the specific symptoms before a heart attack vary greatly among individuals. Symptoms can be abrupt, gradual, or intermittent.

Chest Pain. People with heart disease or risk factors should be concerned about any chest pain, usually precipitated by exercise or stress, that interrupts normal activities and does not clear up after resting or taking angina medications. Chest symptoms might be experienced as follows:

Pain is typically felt as a crushing weight against the chest, accompanied by profuse sweating. The pain may radiate to the left shoulder and arm, the neck or jaw, and even infrequently to the right arm. The arm may be tingling or numb.
Some people may have only a tingling sensation or a sense of fullness, squeezing, or pressure in the chest.
In some patients with a history of heart disease, chest pain is mild. Such patients may have experienced unexplained fatigue, depression, and ill health within a month of a heart attack. Although chest pain is the classic symptom, it occurs in only about half of patients with a heart attack.

Other Common Symptoms.

Nausea, vomiting, and cold sweats
A feeling of indigestion or heartburn
Fainting
A great fear of impending death, a phenomena known as angor animi

Atypical Symptoms. Some studies suggest that nearly half of patients with heart attack do not have chest pain as the primary symptom. Common atypical symptoms of a heart attack include:

Shortness of breath
Cardiac arrest
Dizziness, weakness, and fainting
Abdominal pain

Patients most likely to have atypical symptoms are women and the very elderly (although they can certainly have classic heart attack symptoms as well).

In one study, 52% of elderly people with acute coronary syndrome had atypical symptoms that included shortness of breath, nausea, profuse sweating, pain in the arms, and fainting. Such symptoms were more likely to occur in people with personal or family history of heart disease.
Before a heart attack, women are more likely than men to be nauseous and experience pain high in the abdomen or chest. Their first symptom may be extreme fatigue after physical activity rather than chest pain. Chest pain in women is also more likely to be caused by non-heart problems than in men.

Symptoms That Are Less Likely to Indicate a Heart Attack. The following symptoms are less likely to be due to a heart attack:

Sharp pain brought on by lung movements or coughing
Pain that is mainly or only in the middle or lower abdomen
Pain that can be pinpointed with the top of one finger
Pain that can be reproduced by moving or pressing on the chest wall or arms
Pain that is constant and lasts for hours (although no one should wait hours if they suspect they are having a heart attack)
Pain that is very brief and lasts for a few seconds
Pain that spreads to the legs

However, the presence of these symptoms does not always rule out a serious heart event.

Chest pain is a very common symptom in the emergency room, but heart problems account for only 10 - 33% of all episodes.

The most common causes of chest pain are muscular and bone problems. Problems affecting the ribs and chest muscles include injured muscles, fractures, arthritis, spasms, and infections.

Other causes of chest pain include:

Anxiety attacks
Gastrointestinal disorders (gallstone attacks, peptic ulcer disease, hiatal hernia, heartburn)
Asthma
Spasm in the coronary artery
Abnormalities of the heart muscle
Rupture of the aorta
Collapsed lung
Acute inflammation of the heart
Blood clot in the lung
High thyroid levels (hyperthyroidism)
Anemia
Vasculitis (a group of disorders that cause inflammation of the blood vessels)
Exposure to high altitudes (rare)

Individuals who experience symptoms of a heart attack should take the following actions:

For angina patients, take one nitroglycerin dose either as an under-the-tongue tablet or in spray form at the onset of symptoms. Take another dose every 5 minutes up to three doses or when the pain is relieved, whichever comes first.
Call 911 or the local emergency number. This should be the first action taken if angina patients continue to experience chest pain after taking the full three doses of nitroglycerin. However, only 20% of heart attacks occur in patients with long-standing angina. Therefore, anyone who has heart disease or risk factors for it and experiences heart attack symptoms should contact emergency services.
The patient should chew an aspirin (250 - 500 mg) and be sure that emergency health providers are informed of this so an additional dose is not given.
Patients with chest pain should go immediately to the nearest emergency room, preferably traveling by ambulance. They should not drive themselves.

Click the icon to see an image about heart attack symptoms.

Click the icon to see another image about heart attack symptoms.

Risk Factors

Over 13 million Americans have had angina, a heart attack, or both. Each year, about 1.2 million people will experience a serious heart event. About 25% of all Americans have one or more risk factors for heart disease. Most risk factors for heart disease are related to lifestyle and environmental factors.

Over the past decades, heart disease rates declined in both men and women as they quit smoking and improved dietary habits. This rate, however, has stabilized in recent years, most likely because of the dramatic increase in obesity in the U.S. and other industrialized nations. There have also been minimal changes in other risk factors, including smoking, sedentary behavior, and blood pressure control. Some risk factors cannot be changed, including age, gender, and genetics. Nevertheless, their effects can still be modified with healthy lifestyle changes.

Heart disease may be prevented with a healthy diet and regular exercise, and by quitting smoking if you smoke. Follow your health care provider's recommendations for the treatment and prevention of heart disease.

The American Heart Association guidelines for preventing heart disease recommend:

Improve Cholesterol. People with at least two risk factors and a 10-year risk for heart disease or stroke of more than 20% should aim for LDL levels of less than 100 mg/dl. Statins are now used in more cases.

Keep Blood Pressure Low. People in normal health should have a blood pressure reading of 120/80 mm Hg or less. According to the latest guidelines, blood pressure readings of 120/80 are considered normal, readings of 140/90 or higher indicate hypertension, and readings in between the two are called pre-hypertension. Patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease should maintain blood pressure readings of 130/80 mm Hg or less, while others should be no higher than 140/90 mm Hg.

Exercise. Everyone in normal health should engage in at least moderate physical activity for a minimum of 30 minutes on most, if not all, days of the week.

Healthy Diet. Everyone should aim for a diet that contains a healthy balance of fruits, vegetables, grains, fish, nuts, legumes, poultry, lean meat, and low-fat dairy items. Avoid saturated fats and trans-fatty acids.

Quit Smoking. Also avoid exposure to secondhand smoke.

Maintain Weight. People should aim for a BMI index of 18.5 - 24.9.

Taking Aspirin. People whose risk for heart disease within 10 years is 10% or more should take a low-dose aspirin every day, unless they have medical reasons to avoid aspirin.

Control Diabetes. People with diabetes should aim for fast blood glucose levels of less than 110 mg/dl and hemoglobin A1C or less than 7%.

Control Atrial Fibrillation. People with atrial fibrillation should use anticoagulants to reduce the risk for blood clots.

Age. About 85% of people who die from heart disease are over the age of 65.

Gender. Coronary artery disease and heart attacks are much more common in middle-aged men. Women have, on average, 10 - 15 more years of heart disease-free life than do men, but as women age, they catch up to men. Women, in fact, are more likely to have angina than men. Younger women with heart disease often do not have the same symptoms as their male counterparts and may be less likely to be diagnosed correctly. They are also more likely than men to die after a heart attack.

In 2007, the American Heart Association issued updated guidelines focusing on prevention of heart disease in women. The new guidelines recommend:

Healthy diet (fresh fruits and vegetables, low-fat dairy products, salt and saturated fat restrictions, alcohol moderation)
Eating oily fish (such as salmon) at least twice a week. Women with existing heart disease should consider taking fish oil supplements of 850 – 1,000 mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DPA).
Increased physical activity (60 – 90 minutes, preferably 7 days a week)
Quitting smoking
Low-dose aspirin therapy for all women age 65 years and older who can safely take aspirin. High-risk women may require 75 – 325 mg / day; lower-risk women may benefit from 81 mg a day or 100 mg every other day.

Genetic Factors. Genetics are involved in increasing the likelihood of developing important risk factors such as diabetes and high blood pressure. For example, one genetic variant called apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) affects cholesterol levels, particularly those associated with heart disease.

Ethnicity. African-American women face the highest risk for death from heart disease, and their rate of heart attacks is increasing. (Mortality rates in men do not differ much by race.) Native American men have a lower risk for heart disease than Caucasian men, and Hispanics have the lowest risk for heart disease of all major American population groups.

African-Americans face a number of biologic and social dangers to their hearts.

They have a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension than do Caucasians.
They tend to have poorer diets, higher stress levels, and less access to health care.
All African-Americans risk discrimination in obtaining optimal treatments, but women may be at particular risk for unequal treatment. In one study in which female actors portrayed heart patients, African-American women were 60% less likely to receive aggressive (and expensive) diagnostic tests than African-American men or any Caucasians, even though they presented with similar symptoms.
While African-Americans comprise 13% of the U.S. population, African-Americans have comprised only 2 - 9% of subjects in most major research trials, so knowledge about their specific risks is limited.
Some African-Americans with coronary artery disease appear to have a genetic trait that increases the danger of triglycerides, which may be particularly hazardous for women.

Click the icon to see an image about ethnicity and heart disease risks.

Cholesterol. In spite of its bad press, cholesterol is an essential nutrient necessary for many cellular functions. However, when certain cholesterol levels rise in the blood, they can have dangerous consequences, depending on the type of cholesterol. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is the "bad" cholesterol responsible for many heart problems. Triglycerides are another type of lipid (fat molecule) that can be bad for the heart. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is the "good" cholesterol that helps protect against heart disease. Doctors test for a "total cholesterol" profile that includes measurements for LDL, HDL, and triglycerides. The ratio of these lipids can affect heart disease risk.

For example, according to one study, men with total cholesterol levels over 240 mg/dl have a risk that is two to four times higher than men whose cholesterol is below 200. A number of studies have demonstrated that reducing LDL and total cholesterol levels and boosting high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels can improve survival and prevent heart attacks in people with and without heart disease.

It is very difficult to measure LDL levels by themselves, but LDL levels can be reliably calculated by the Friedewald formula: LDL=TC-HDL-TG/5. (LDL=low-density lipoprotein; TC= total cholesterol; HDL=high-density lipoprotein; TG=triglycerides.)

Click the icon to see an image about serum cholesterol.

Cholesterol Goals. In 2004, the National Cholesterol Education Program updated its clinical practice guidelines. The new recommendations set lower treatment goals for LDL levels based on a patient's risk factors for heart disease.

These risk factors include:

Having a first-degree female relative diagnosed with heart disease before age 65 or a first-degree male relative diagnosed before age 55
Being male and over age 45 or female and over age 55
Cigarette smoking
Diabetes
High blood pressure
Metabolic syndrome (risk factors associated with obesity such as low HDL levels and high triglycerides

Having two or more of these risk factors indicates a greater than 20% chance of having a heart attack within 10 years.


Risk Level	Goal (d/L)	Optimal Goal(d/L)
Very High Risk	70	70
High Risk	100	70
Moderate Risk	130	100
Low Risk	160	130

LDL cholesterol, together with other risk factors for heart disease, is the best determinant for whether cholesterol therapy is needed and whether it is working properly. In particular, the new guidelines emphasize lower LDL levels and earlier treatment for people with coronary artery disease, or other forms of atherosclerosis, and diabetes.


Total Cholesterol Goals	LDL Goals	HDL Goals	Triglyceride Goals
Less than 200 mg/dL is desirable. Between 200 and 239 is borderline. Over 240 is high.	70 mg/dL or less is the new goal for very high-risk patients (recent heart attack; current active or unstable cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease; or two multiple risk factors as defined above.) Below 100 mg/dl is optimal for everyone. It should be the goal for high-risk people including those with existing heart disease, diabetes, or two or more risk factors for heart disease; 70 mg/dL is an optimal goal for these individuals. 130 mg/dl or below for people with two or more risk factors; 100 mg/dL is the optimal goal. 160 mg/dl or less for people at less risk (one or zero risk factors); 130 mg/dL is the optimal goal. Anything over 160 is high with levels over 190 being very high. LDL levels over 190 require medication even with no other cardiac risk factors present.	Levels above 40 mg/dL are desirable; levels above 60 mg/DL are optimal.	Below 150 mg/dL is normal. 150-199 is borderline high. 200-499 is high. Over 500 is very high.
*Risk factors for heart disease include a family history of early heart problems before age 55 for men, before age 65 for women, smoking, high blood pressure, diabetes, being older (over 45 for men and 55 for women), and having HDL levels below 35 mg/dl. People with two or more of these risk factors may have a 10-year risk of heart attack that exceeds 20%, and may therefore need to aim for LDL levels of 100 mg/dL or below.

Other Lipids. Elevated levels of other fatty molecules (lipids) are also now thought to be important indicators of heart disease risk. Studies are finding an elevated risk for angina and first heart attacks in people with elevated levels of lipoprotein(a), or lp(a). This lipoprotein falls somewhere in density between HDL and LDL and may have some properties that increase the risk for blood clots. Some experts suggest, however, that high levels of lp(a) may merely be markers of late-stage atherosclerosis, not a cause.

[See In-Depth Report #23: Cholesterol; and In-Depth Report #43: Heart-healthy diet.]

High blood pressure, or hypertension, has long been a proven cause of coronary artery disease. Blood pressure is categorized as normal, prehypertensive, and hypertensive (which is further divided as Stage 1 or 2 according to severity). High blood pressure is generally considered to be a blood pressure reading greater than or equal to 140 mm Hg (systolic) or greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg (diastolic). Blood pressure readings in the prehypertension category (120 - 139 systolic or 80 - 89 diastolic) indicate an increased risk for developing hypertension. [See Table Blood Pressure Ranges.]

A normal blood pressure reading is 120/80 mm Hg or lower. Most people with high blood pressure should aim for a goal of below 140/90 mm Hg. Patients with certain health problems should aim lower (blood pressure in patients with kidney disease, heart failure, or diabetes should be equal to or lower than 130/80 mm Hg.)

Click the icon to see an image about hypertension.


Blood Pressure Category	Ranges for Most Adults (systolic/diastolic)
Normal Blood Pressure (systolic/diastolic)	Systolic below 120 mm Hg Diastolic below 80 mm Hg
Prehypertension (Formerly Classified as Normal to High-Normal Blood Pressure)	Systolic 120 to 139 mm Hg Diastolic 80 to 89 mm Hg (NOTE: 139/89 or below should be the minimum goal for everyone. People with diabetes or chronic kidney disease should strive for 130/80 or less.)
Mild Hypertension (Stage 1)	Systolic 140 to 159 mm Hg Diastolic 90 to 99 mm Hg
Moderate-to-Severe Hypertension (Stage 2)	Systolic over 160 mm Hg and/or Diastolic over 100 mm Hg
Note: If one of the measurements is in a higher category than the other, the higher measurement is usually used to determine the stage. For example, if systolic pressure is 165 (Stage 2) and diastolic is 92 (Stage 1), the patient would still be diagnosed with Stage 2 hypertension. A high systolic pressure should be a major focus of concern in most adults.

American obesity is at epidemic levels in all age groups. The effect of obesity on cholesterol levels is complex. Although obesity does not appear to be strongly associated with overall cholesterol levels, among obese individuals triglyceride levels are usually high while HDL (beneficial cholesterol) levels tend to be low, both risk factors for heart disease. Obesity has other effects (hypertension, increase in inflammation) that pose major risks to the heart.

Click the icon to see an image of childhood obesity.

Obesity is particularly hazardous when it is one of the components of the metabolic syndrome. This syndrome is diagnosed when three of the following are present: abdominal obesity, low HDL cholesterol, high triglyceride levels, high blood pressure, and insulin resistance. Metabolic syndrome is a pre-diabetic condition that is significantly associated with heart disease and higher mortality rates from all causes. A 2002 study estimated that 24% of the population now has this condition. Obesity is highly linked with type 2 diabetes, and diabetes itself poses a significant risk for high cholesterol levels and heart disease.

Some obese patients with coronary artery disease may consider having bariatric surgery (stomach bypass) to lose excess weight. The weight lost after surgery can help improve blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar and other factors associated with CAD. A 2005 study reported that bariatric surgery is safe for patients with CAD who cannot lose weight with diet and exercise, which should always be tried first.

[See In-Depth Report #53: Weight control and diet.]

People who are sedentary are almost twice as likely to suffer heart attacks as are people who exercise regularly. Exercise has a number of effects that benefit the heart and circulation, including:

Improving cholesterol and lipid levels
Reducing inflammation in the arteries
Assisting weight loss programs
Helping to keep blood vessels flexible and open

Studies continue to show that physical activity and avoiding high-fat foods are the two most successful means of reaching and maintaining heart healthy levels of fitness and weight.

Experts have been attempting to define how much exercise is needed to produce heart benefits. In 2002, a well-conducted study on overweight adults confirmed previous research that reported beneficial changes in cholesterol and lipid levels even when people performed low amounts of moderate or high intensity exercise (walking or jogging 12 miles a week). However, more intense exercise is required to significantly change cholesterol levels, notably by increasing HDL (the so-called good cholesterol). Overweight people who have trouble losing pounds can still achieve considerable heart benefits by exercising. Resistance (weight) training has also been associated with heart protection. Exercises that train and strengthen the chest muscles may prove to be very important for patients with angina.

Click the icon to see an image about exercise.

Click the icon to see an image about hypertension and lifestyle changes.

Some studies suggest that for the greatest heart protection, it is not the duration of a single exercise session that counts but the total daily amount of energy expended. Therefore, the best way to exercise may be in multiple short bouts of intense exercise, which can be particularly helpful for older people.

Sudden strenuous exercise (such as snow shoveling and mowing lawns) puts many people at risk for angina and heart attack. Activities that involve raising the arms above the head may also be risky. Patients with angina should never exercise shortly after eating. People with risk factors for heart disease should seek medical clearance and a detailed exercise prescription. And all people, including healthy individuals, should listen carefully to their bodies for signs of distress as they exercise. [See In-Depth Report #29: Exercise.]

Heart disease and stroke are the leading causes of death in people with diabetes. People with diabetes are at risk for the following heart-risk conditions, and the more of these conditions they have, the worse the outlook.

High blood pressure (hypertension). Up to 75% of cardiovascular problems in people with diabetes may be due to hypertension.
Very unhealthy cholesterol and lipid balances (high triglyceride levels and lower HDL).
Blood clotting problems.
Impaired nerve function (neuropathy), which can also damage the heart. Some experts estimate that the mortality rates from neuropathy-related heart conditions range from 15 - 53%.

People with both diabetes and heart disease may have a higher risk for silent ischemia, a condition in which people have blocked arteries but do not experience the angina, the chest pain that signals heart disease. [See In-Depth Report #9: Diabetes - type 1; or In-Depth Report #60: Diabetes - type 2.]

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) occurs when atherosclerosis affects the extremities, particularly the feet and legs. The major risk factors for heart disease and stroke are also the most important risk factors for PAD. (The combination of such conditions with PAD also produces more severe forms of heart or circulatory disease.) Although signs of heart disease are detected in only 20 - 40% of patients with PAD after an initial diagnosis, studies suggest that when intense heart-diagnostics tests are performed, such as angiography or thallium stress tests, co-existing heart disease is detected in up to 90% of all PAD patients. [See In-Depth Report #102: Peripheral artery disease.]

Smokers in their 30s and 40s have a heart-attack rate that is five times higher than their nonsmoking peers. Cigarette smoking may be directly responsible for at least 20% of all deaths from heart disease, or about 120,000 deaths annually. Smoking cigars may increase the risk of early death from heart disease, although evidence is much stronger for cigarette smoking. Although heavy cigarette smokers are at greatest risk, a 2002 study suggested that people who smoke as few as three cigarettes a day are at higher risk for blood vessel abnormalities that endanger the heart. Regular exposure to passive smoke also increases the risk of heart disease in nonsmokers. [See In-Depth Report #41: Smoking.]

Eating habits can be protective or dangerous to the heart. Avoiding saturated fats and trans-fatty acids is particularly important for controlling cholesterol.

Diet plays an important role in the health of the heart. In 2006, the American Heart Association (AHA) issued revised diet and lifestyle recommendations. The current guidelines recommend:

Balance calorie intake and physical activity to achieve or maintain a healthy body weight. (Controlling weight, quitting smoking, and exercising regularly are essential companions of any diet program. Try to get at least 30 minutes, and preferably 60 – 90 minutes, of daily exercise.)
Consume a diet rich in a variety of vegetables and fruits. Vegetables and fruits that are deeply colored (spinach, carrots, peaches, berries) are especially recommended as they have the highest micronutrient content.
Choose whole-grain, high-fiber foods. These include fruits, vegetables, and legumes (beans). Good whole grain choices include whole wheat, oats/oatmeal, rye, barley, brown rice, buckwheat, bulgur, millet, and quinoa.
Consume fish, especially oily fish, at least twice a week (about 8 ounces/week). Oily fish such as salmon, mackerel, and sardines are rich in the omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Consumption of these fatty acids is linked to reduced risk of sudden death and death from coronary artery disease.
Limit daily intake of saturated fat (found mostly in animal products) to less than 7% of total calories, trans fat (found in hydrogenated fats, commercially baked products, and many fast foods) to less than 1% of total calories, and cholesterol (found in eggs, dairy products, meat, poultry, fish, shellfish) to less than 300 mg per day. Choose lean meats and vegetable alternatives (such as soy). Select fat-free and low-fat dairy products. Grill, bake, or broil fish, meat, and skinless poultry.
Use little or no salt in your foods. Reducing salt can lower blood pressure and decrease the risk of heart disease and heart failure.
Cut down on beverages and foods that contain added sugars (corn syrups, sucrose, glucose, fructose, maltrose, dextrose, concentrated fruit juice, honey.)
If you consume alcohol, do so in moderation. The AHA recommends limiting alcohol to no more than 2 drinks per day for men and 1 drink per day for women.

[See In-Depth Report #43: Heart-healthy diet.]

Stress. The effects of mental stress on heart disease are controversial. Stress can affect the heart when it activates the sympathetic nervous system (the automatic part of the nervous system that affects many organs, including the heart). Some studies suggest an association between acute stress and a higher risk for serious cardiac events, such as heart rhythm abnormalities and heart attacks, in people with heart disease. However, not all studies report strong evidence that stress has any effect on the heart, particularly in people without any history of heart disease. [See In-Depth Report #31: Stress.]

Depression. Depression increases the severity of heart attack and may even worsen a patient's response to medication for heart disease. Although people with heart disease may become depressed, this does not explain entirely the link between the two problems. Data suggest that depression itself may be a risk factor for heart disease as well as its increased severity.

A number of studies indicate that depression has biologic effects on the heart, including blood clotting and heart rate. One study, for example, reported an association between depression and a greater risk for death from heart problems even in people without a history of heart disease. Even mild depression, which includes feelings of hopelessness experienced over many years, may harm the heart. A 2007 study suggested that depressive symptoms (fatigue, loss of appetite) may be a sign of thickening arteries, the early stage of coronary artery disease. [See In-Depth Report #8: Depression.]

Benefits of Moderate Drinking. Several studies have found heart protection from moderate intake of alcohol (one or two glasses a day). Moderate alcohol consumption can help boost HDL levels. Alcohol may also prevent blood clots and inflammation. Although red wine is most often cited for healthful properties, any type of alcoholic beverage appears to have similar benefit.

Adverse Effects of Heavy Drinking. By contrast, heavy drinking harms the heart. In fact, heart disease is the leading cause of death in alcoholics. Evidence suggests that people who consume more than three drinks a day have abnormal blood clotting factors. Heavy alcohol consumption can raise blood pressure, and binge drinking may increase the risk for hemorrhagic stroke (caused by bleeding in the brain). Large doses of alcohol can trigger irregular heartbeats, which can be dangerous in people with existing heart disease.

Pregnant women and people who can't drink moderately should not drink at all.

Homocysteine and Vitamin B Deficiencies. Deficiencies in the B vitamins folate (known also as folic acid), B6, and B12 have been associated with a higher risk for heart disease in some studies. Such deficiencies produce higher blood levels of homocysteine, an amino acid that has been associated with a higher risk for heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. Researchers have been studying whether vitamin B supplements can reduce homocysteine levels and, consequently, heart disease risks.

Several major 2006 studies indicated that while B vitamin supplements do help lower homocysteine levels, they have no effect on heart disease outcomes. The studies, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, examined patients who had either recently had a heart attack or suffered from diabetes or heart disease. Results showed a similar number of heart attacks and strokes among patients who took B vitamins and those who received placebo. Some experts think that homocysteine may be a marker for heart disease rather than a cause of it.

Click the icon to see the benefits of vitamin B.

Click the icon to see the food sources of vitamin B.

C-Reactive Protein. C-reactive protein is a product of the inflammatory process. Evidence increasingly suggests that high levels may predict future heart disease. It is not known if the protein plays any causal role or whether it is simply a marker for other factors in the disease process.

C. pneumoniae and Other Infectious Organisms. Some microorganisms and viruses have been under suspicion for triggering the inflammation and damage in the arteries that contribute to heart disease. The strongest evidence to date supports a possible role from Chlamydia (C.) pneumoniae (a non-bacterial organism that causes mild pneumonia in young adults). C. pneumoniae has been detected in plaques in the arteries of patients with heart disease. In some studies, evidence of previous infection has been associated with a higher risk for heart events.

Other studies also suggest that cytomegalovirus (CMV), a common virus, may have similar effects. Many people, however, have been infected with these organisms, and no clear association has been found with any of these infections.(H. pylori, the bacteria that causes peptic ulcers, has also been studied for heart effects, but evidence is very weak on any link.)

Erectile Dysfunction. Recent research suggests that erectile dysfunction may be a warning sign of coronary artery disease, even in men who are not considered at risk for the condition. Some studies indicate that men with erectile dysfunction have higher levels of C-reactive protein and more symptoms of atherosclerosis than men without erectile problems.

Periodontal Disease. A number of studies support an association between periodontal disease and cardiovascular disorders. According to a 2003 major analysis, periodontal (gum) disease is associated with a 20% higher risk for ischemic stroke and heart disease. (The added risk may be even higher in adults under 65.) Recent evidence is pointing to the inflammatory response as the common element.

Click the icon to see an image of gum disease.

Anemia. Anemia has adverse effects on the heart and increases the severity of cardiac conditions, including heart failure and heart attacks. A 2002 study suggested that anemia may even be a risk factor for heart disease itself. Blood transfusions after a heart attack improve survival rates in elderly patients who are anemic.

Iron Overload. An inherited disease called hemochromatosis, in which the intestinal tract absorbs too much iron from food, has been associated with atherosclerosis and heart attack. About 10% of Caucasians carry the gene for this condition. There is no strong evidence that excess iron levels in people without hemochromatosis can contribute to heart disease.

Sleep Apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea is a condition in which tissues in the upper throat collapse at intervals during sleep, thereby blocking the passage of air. It has been strongly associated with high blood pressure and obesity, but is also associated with heart disease and heart attacks, regardless of these risk factors. Some evidence suggests that obstructive apneas cause an increase in stiffness and inflammation in the arteries.

Some inborn or natural conditions are not risk factors themselves but have been associated with a higher incidence of heart disease or its consequences:

Factors Before Birth and In Infancy. Low weight at birth and in the womb has been associated with later heart disease in a few studies. Some suggest, however, that this may just reflect poor nutrition in the mother, which appears to affect life-long risk.

Seasonal Differences. More deaths from heart disease occur in December and January, and the fewest in the summertime. Although lower temperatures and snow shoveling may play a role in some cases, more winter deaths have been reported even in warm regions. Holiday stress or fewer daylight hours have been suggested as other reasons for these higher winter rates.

Physical Characteristics. Male pattern baldness, hair in the ear canals, and creased earlobes are associated with a higher risk for heart disease in Caucasian males.

Click the icon to see an image of an ear lobe crease.

Diagnosis

Many tests can diagnose possible heart disease. The choice of which (and how many) tests to perform depends on the patient's risk factors, history of heart problems, and current symptoms. Usually the tests begin with the simplest and may progress to more complicated ones.

Doctors routinely check for high blood pressure and unhealthy cholesterol levels in all older adults. Specific tests are also important in people who may have risk factors or symptoms of diabetes. Doctors may also test for homocysteine, the protein albumin, and blood clotting factors, especially fibrinogen.

An electrocardiogram (ECG) measures and records the electrical activity of the heart. Between 25 - 50% of people who suffer from angina or have silent ischemia, however, have normal ECG readings. The waves measured by the ECG correspond to the contraction and relaxation pattern of the different parts of the heart. Specific waves seen on an ECG are named with letters:

The electrocardiogram (ECG, EKG) is used extensively in the diagnosis of heart disease, from congenital heart disease in infants to myocardial infarction and myocarditis in adults. Several different types of electrocardiogram exist.

P. The P wave is associated with the contractions of the atria (the two chambers in the heart that receive blood from outside).
QRS. The QRS is a series of waves associated with ventricular contractions. (The ventricles are the two major pumping chambers in the heart.)
T and U. These waves follow the ventricular contractions.

The most important wave patterns in diagnosing and determining treatment for heart disease and heart attack are called ST elevations and Q waves.

A depressed or horizontal ST wave suggests some blockage and the presence of a heart disease, even if there is no angina present. (This finding, however, is not very accurate, particularly in women, and can occur without heart problems).
ST elevations and Q waves are the most important wave patterns in diagnosing and determining treatment for a heart attack. They suggest that an artery to the heart is blocked, and that the full thickness of the heart muscle is damaged. ST segment elevations do not always mean the patient has a heart attack. And, some heart attack patients do not have elevated ST segments. Other factors are important in making a diagnosis.

The primary value of exercise stress tests is not to detect coronary artery disease but to help determine the severity and predict the outcome of an existing heart condition. It is considered for the following people:

Patients with possible or probable angina and low or intermediate risk for adverse heart events.
Selected adults who do not have symptoms of heart disease but are at moderate risk to high risk for developing heart disease (a 10 - 20% chance within 10 years). Moreover, heart blockage without angina (silent ischemia) may suggest a more severe condition, at least in men.

Basic Procedure. A stress test (exercise tolerance test) monitors the patient's heart rhythms, blood pressure, and clinical status. It can tell how well the heart handles work and if parts of the heart have decreased blood supply. A typical stress test involves:

The patient walks on a treadmill or rides a stationary bicycle. Exercise continues until the heart is beating at least 85% of its maximum rate, until symptoms of heart trouble occur (changes in blood pressure, heart rhythm abnormalities, angina, fatigue), or the patient simply wants to stop.
For patients who cannot exercise, the doctor may administer dobutamine or arbutamine, which are drugs that simulate the stress of exercise.
An ECG is used to monitor heart rhythms during a stress test. (An echocardiogram or more advanced imaging technique may also be used to visualize the actions of the heart and blood flow.)

More than 25% of patients stop exercising before they reach their own maximum limits because of fear of a heart event. Patients should be reassured that the activities performed in the test under the guidance of a professional are safe.

Interpreting Results. To accurately assess heart problems, experts look at a number of findings derived from the ECG and other tools during exercise. They include:

Exercise capacity. This is a measure of a person's capacity to reach certain metabolic rates.
Heart rate and ST waves. On ECGs, doctors specifically look for abnormalities in part of the wave tracing called an ST segment. A certain type of ST segment depression may suggest the presence of heart disease. However, gender, drugs and other medical conditions can affect the ST segment. Using a measurement that adjusts the ST segment to heart rate improves accuracy.
Dukes Treadmill Score. This important score uses the number of minutes a patient can exercise and other factors that are present in patients with exercise-limiting angina.
Heart rate recovery.
Chronotropic index. This is the percentage of the heart-rate reserve that is used during the exercise. A result of 80% or less suggests a significant risk for serious heart problems in most patients.
Changes in systolic blood pressure.

Using these and other measures, doctors can determine risk fairly accurately, particularly for men of any age with chronic stable angina. The test has limitations, however, and some are significant. For example, a 2002 study indicated that in patients with suspected unstable angina the chances for a future adverse heart event remain high even if the exercise test shows low risk. In addition, for many reasons, the test is less accurate in women, and an echocardiogram may be a more accurate procedure for them. About 10% of patients, particularly younger people, will have false positive test results. In such cases, test results indicate abnormalities when there are no heart problems.

An echocardiogram is a noninvasive test that uses ultrasound images of the heart. This test is more expensive than an ECG, but it can be very valuable, particularly when used with a stress test, to detect the location and extent of heart muscle damage. It appears to be more accurate for women than ECG stress tests, but at this time it is not routinely recommended as a replacement for most women.

Computed tomography (CT) scans used alone or with ECG may be used to detect calcium deposits on the arterial walls, which are strong indicators of current and future coronary artery disease. The presence of calcium does not always signify narrowing of the arteries. But, the absence of calcification in the arteries indicates the patient has no risk for heart disease.

Advanced CT techniques are improving accuracy:

Click the icon to see an image of a CT scan.

Electron Beam Computed Tomography. Electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) is a CT technique that scans the heart so quickly that the motion of the heart appears frozen. This procedure identifies calcification and stratifies cardiac risk accurately.
Multidetector Computed Tomography. Another CT technique called multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is able to take pictures of the entire heart in 1 millimeter slices in the time it takes for a patient to hold one breath. A 2006 study indicated that MDCT tends to have a high “false-positive” rate (indicating disease when it is not actually there), but for some patients the test may be helpful in ruling out coronary artery disease.

Some expert groups recommend CT scans in selected patients who have an intermediate risk (10 - 20% chance of heart disease within 10 years). For some of these patients, EBCT may be preferred over exercise stress testing, but most experts recommend a stress test as the main diagnostic tool. In general, the use of these expensive imaging tests is probably not very helpful for people at low or high risk. (For people with high risk, the additional information from these tests would not add much value.) More research is needed to determine the benefits of CT scanning in specific individuals.

Radionuclide procedures use imaging techniques and computer analyses to plot and detect the passage of radioactive tracers through the region of the heart. Such tracing elements are typically given intravenously. Radionuclide imaging is useful for diagnosing and determining:

Severity of unstable angina when less expensive diagnostic approaches are unavailable or unreliable
Severity of chronic coronary artery disease
Success of surgeries for coronary artery disease.
Whether a heart attack has occurred

Various imaging techniques may be used with radionuclide procedures, including:

Planar scintigraphy uses a special overhead camera and is the oldest scanning technique.
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) uses a camera that rotates around the patient and takes pictures of "slices" of the heart. It is more accurate than planar imaging in precisely locating problems in the arteries.
Positron-emission tomographic (PET) scanners employ multiple rings that surround the patients, which detect and record atomic particles (photons) that are emitted by the tracer elements (such as radioactive oxygen, nitrogen, or carbon). It is more expensive and less widely available than SPECT.

Myocardial Perfusion (Blood Flow) Imaging Test (also called the Thallium Stress Test). This radionuclide test is typically used with an exercise stress test to determine blood flow to the heart muscles. It is a reliable measure of severe heart events. It may be useful in determining the need for angiography if CT scans have detected calcification in the arteries. About a minute before the patient is ready to stop exercising, the doctor administers a radioactive tracer into the intravenous line. (Tracers include thallium, technetium, or sestamibi.) Immediately afterwards, the patient lies down for a heart scan, usually with a planar scintigraphy or with SPECT. If the scan detects damage, more images are taken 3 or 4 hours later. Damage due to a prior heart attack will persist when the heart scan is repeated. Injury caused by angina, however, will have resolved by that time.

Radionuclide Angiography. This is a technique for visualizing the chambers and major blood vessels of the heart. It uses an injected radioactive tracer and can be performed during exercise, at rest, or with use of stress-inducing drugs. It is an excellent test for assessing the heart's pumping action and for determining the severity of coronary artery disease. It is an alternative to echocardiograms in certain situations.

Click the icon to see an internal view of the heart.

Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA). MRA is a very promising noninvasive imaging technique that can provide three-dimensional images of the major arteries to the heart and identify disease with high accuracy. Experts believe this approach will eventually be a good alternative to angiography.

Click the icon to see an image of a MRI.

Angiography is an invasive test. It is used for patients who show strong evidence for severe obstruction on stress and other tests, and for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

A narrow tube is inserted into an artery, usually in the leg or arm, and then threaded up through the body to the coronary arteries.
A dye is injected into the tube, and an x-ray records the flow of dye through the arteries.
This process provides a map of the coronary circulation, revealing any blocked areas.

Click the icon to see an image of dye in the coronary artery.

Major complications include stroke, heart attacks, and kidney damage. These risks are very low (about 0.1%), however, if the procedure is done in an experienced medical center (one that performs at least 300 of these operations every year). Allergic reactions can also occur. The procedure is expensive, and between 10 - 30% of patients who have this procedure have normal results.

When heart cells become damaged, they release different enzymes and other molecules into the bloodstream. Elevated levels of such markers of heart damage in the blood or urine may help predict a heart attack in patients with severe chest pain and help determine treatment. Some of these factors include:

Troponins. The proteins cardiac troponin T and I are released when the heart muscle is damaged. Both are proving to be among the best diagnostic indications of heart attacks. They help to identify many individuals with ACS who might otherwise be misdiagnosed.
Creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB). CK-MB has been a standard marker, but the MB fraction is not as accurate as troponin levels, since elevated levels can appear in people without heart injury.
Myoglobin. Myoglobin is a protein found in heart muscles. It is released early in the injured heart, and it may be useful in combination with CK-MB and the troponins.
Newer biomarkers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), homocysteine, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), urinary albumin, and fibrinogen.

Several 2006 studies that evaluated how well biomarkers predict risk of heart events concluded that they do not provide much more useful information than standard risk factors (high blood pressure, unhealthy cholesterol levels, diabetes). At this time, most experts feel that these standard disease risk factors provide the best predictors of the likelihood of developing coronary artery disease, heart attack, or stroke.

Managing Heart Disease

The approach for managing any degree of coronary artery disease involves lifestyle changes. Depending on severity and individual conditions, patients may need one or more medications, surgery, or both.

Healthy diet, regular exercise and quitting smoking if you are a smoker may prevent heart disease. Follow your health care provider's recommendations for treatment and prevention of heart disease.

Experts have come up with a mnemonic device (ABCDE) for remembering 10 factors that are fundamental for management of stable angina and coronary artery disease:

A. Aspirin and anti-angina drugs

B. Blood pressure and beta-blockers

C. Cholesterol-lowering drugs (typically statins) and cigarettes (stopping)

D. Diet and diabetes control

E. Exercise and education

Unstable angina is now usually classified with non-Q myocardial infarction as acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in professional discussions of treatments. ACS usually requires more aggressive treatments, including surgery. [ACS is more fully discussed in In-Depth Report #12: Heart attack and acute coronary syndrome.]

Click the icon to see an image about angina.

Anti-Clotting Medications

Anti-clotting drugs that inhibit or break up blood clots are used at every stage of heart disease. They are generally classified as either antiplatelets or anticoagulants. All anti-clotting therapies carry the risk of bleeding, which can lead to dangerous situations, including stroke.

A thrombus is a blood clot that forms in a vessel and remains there. An embolism is a clot that travels from the site where it formed to another location in the body. Thrombi or emboli can lodge in a blood vessel and block the flow of blood in that location depriving tissues of normal blood flow and oxygen. This can result in damage, destruction (infarction), or even death of the tissues (necrosis) in that area.

Antiplatelet Drugs. These drugs prevent formation of blood platelets. Platelets are very small disc-shaped blood cells that are important for blood clotting.

Aspirin. Aspirin is an antiplatelet. It is the most common anti-clotting drug. Nearly anyone with existing heart disease or at risk for it is advised to take a low-dose aspirin every day.
Thienopyridines. Clopidogrel (Plavix) and ticlopidine (Ticlid) are thienopyridines, another type of anti-platelet drug.
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors. These powerful blood-thinning drugs include abciximab (ReoPro, Centocor), eptifibatide (Integrilin), tirofiban (Aggrastat), and lamifiban. They are administered intravenously in the hospital and are used after angioplasty surgery and stent placement.

Click the icon to see an image about blood.

Anticoagulants. Anticoagulants help thin blood and include:

Heparin
Warfarin (Coumadin)
Direct thrombin inhibitors

Aspirin. Aspirin is known as a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). It stops blood platelets, which are major clotting factors, from sticking together to form a blood clot. A daily low-dose aspirin (75 - 325 mg) is usually the first choice for preventing heart disease in high-risk individuals. Aspirin can prevent by 25 – 50% the risk of heart attacks and death in people with existing heart disease and a history of heart attack. It also reduces the risk for stroke. According to a 2006 review, aspirin works equally well for both men and women.

Click the icon to see an image about stomach ulcers.

Side effects from prolonged use of aspirin may include stomach ulcers and bleeding. (There may be a slight increased risk for bleeding-related strokes, which are very uncommon, however. Furthermore, this risk may be outweighed by protection against the more common type of stroke, which is caused by artery blockage.)

Clopidogreland Ticlopidine. Clopidogrel (Plavix) and ticlopidine (Ticlide) are anti-platelet drugs known as thienopyridines. When taken with aspirin, these drugs can significantly reduce the risk for heart attack and stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina or early signs of heart attack). The combination of aspirin and a thienopyridine is essential for patients who have a drug-eluting stent. According to a 2007 American Heart Association advisory, patients who have a drug-eluting stent must take both aspirin and a thienopyridine for at least 1 year after the stent is inserted. Many experts recommend clopidogrel instead of ticlopidine because ticlopidine has been associated with dangerous blood disorders, particularly thrombocytopenia.

Clopidogrel is also recommended for patients who are undergoing angioplasty. For patients having coronary bypass surgery, it should be withheld for at least 5 -7 days prior to surgery because of a significant bleeding risk. Researchers are investigating whether clopidogrel and aspirin together are better than aspirin alone in reducing the risks following coronary bypass surgery. A 2006 study suggested that for some patients with heart disease, clopidogrel plus aspirin does not work better than aspirin alone for preventing a first heart attack or stroke.

Click the icon to see an image of the developmental process of atherosclerosis.

Click the icon to see an image about atherosclerosis.

Anticoagulants are drugs that prevent or delay blood coagulation and the formation of blood clots. Heparin has been the standard anticoagulant, but a number of drugs are now available that are proving to be better choices in many cases.

Standard (Unfractionated) Heparin. The heparin referred to as unfractionated heparin has been the standard for years and is used alone or in combination with aspirin for managing unstable angina. It is no longer the recommended first choice, however, for this patient group. It must be intravenously administered and monitored with frequent blood tests. The major complication is thrombocytopenia (a severe drop in platelets). This condition is extremely serious and can become life-threatening, particularly with bleeding in various body tissues. Alternatives include low-molecular weight heparin and direct thrombin inhibitors.

Low-Molecular Weight Heparin. Enoxaparin (Lovenox), dalteparin (Fragmin), tinzaparin (Innohep) are drugs known as low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). Many doctors now recommend these drugs over standard heparin for patients with unstable angina (unless bypass surgery is being planned). They have similar rates of survival, recurring angina, and bleeding as standard heparin. However, they pose lower risks for heart attack, repeat angioplasties, and thrombocytopenia. They require injections but do not require the ongoing monitoring that standard heparin does. Patients may even be able to self-administer LMWHs as people with diabetes do insulin.

Warfarin. Warfarin (Coumadin) is an oral anticoagulant. It prevents clots by inhibiting vitamin K. Warfarin is used with aspirin after a heart attack to prevent another one and to prevent blood clots in patients with atrial fibrillation. Warfarin is also proving to be more effective than aspirin for preventing heart attacks in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Warfarin therapy poses a dangerous risk for bleeding and blood coagulation must be monitored with frequent blood tests.

Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTIs). Direct thrombin inhibitors are a more recent group of anti-coagulants. The first DTI was hirudin, a natural substance derived from the saliva of leeches. New forms include argatroban (Novastan), bivalirudin (Angiomax), danaparoid (Orgaran), lepirudin (Refludan), desirudin (Revasc), and ximelagatran (Exanta). Many of these drugs are used along with warfarin and may be good options for patients who develop thrombocytopenia with heparin use. DTIs may prove to be superior to standard heparin for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Other Medications

Nitrates have been used in the treatment of angina for over 100 years. These drugs release nitric oxide, thereby relaxing the smooth muscles in blood vessels. Many nitrate preparations are available. The most commonly used are nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate, and isosorbide mononitrate. Nitrates can be absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract (oral tablet), skin (ointment or patch), or from under the tongue (sublingual tablet or spray).

Rapid Acting Nitrates. Rapid-acting nitrates are used to treat acute attacks. Nitroglycerin is the most widely used drug for this purpose. It can be administered under the tongue (sublingually or as a spray) or pocketed between the upper lip and gum (buccally) and can relieve angina within minutes. The procedure for taking nitroglycerin during an attack is as follows:

At the onset of an angina attack, the patient administers one sublingual or buccal tablet or one metered dose of the spray.
If the pain is not relieved within 5 minutes the patient takes a second dose; a third can be taken after another 5 minutes if symptoms persist.
If pain continues after a total of three doses in 15 minutes, the patient should go immediately to the nearest emergency room.

Nitroglycerin is very volatile so its potency can be easily lost. Patients should take the following precautions:

Keep no more than 100 tablets on hand, stored in their original container.
When first opened, the cotton filler should be discarded, and the cap screwed on tightly immediately after each use.
A supply should always be kept close at hand in case of an attack, with the rest kept in a cool dry place.

Intermediate to Long-Term Nitrates. Sublingual tablets of isosorbide dinitrate have a somewhat slower onset of action than nitroglycerin and are useful for preventing exercise angina. Ointments, patches, and oral tablets are used for longer-term prevention of angina attacks:

Transdermal patches are applied in the morning to any hair- or injury-free area on the chest, back, stomach, thigh, or upper arm. Hands should be washed after each patch or ointment application, and sites of application should be rotated to avoid skin irritation.
Nitroglycerin ointment is applied by measuring out an even amount on an applicator paper and then placing, not rubbing or massaging, it on the chest, stomach, or thigh. Any ointment that remains from the previous application should be removed.

Long-acting forms may lose their effectiveness over time, so doctors generally schedule nitrate-free breaks to prevent tolerance. Some concern exists that nitrate-free periods might increase the risk for angina and adverse heart events. One large study, however, found no increased danger when patients used a nitroglycerine patch with scheduled breaks. The use of high blood pressure drugs known as ACE inhibitors may help prevent tolerance to nitrates.

Side Effects. Nitrates have many side effects, some of which can be serious.

Common side effects of nitrates include headaches, dizziness, nausea and vomiting, blurred vision, fast heartbeat, sweating, and flushing on the face and neck. Low blood pressure and dizziness can be relieved by lying down with the legs elevated. These effects are significantly worsened by alcohol, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, sildenafil (Viagra), and certain antidepressants. The doctor may prescribe medicines to lessen these side effects. Patients should contact their doctor if these side effects are persistent or severe.

Serious side effects requiring immediate medical help include fever, joint or chest pain, sore throat, skin rash (especially on the face), unusual bleeding or bruising, weight gain, and swelling of the ankles.

Withdrawal. Withdrawal from nitrates should be gradual. Abrupt termination may cause angina attacks.

Beta-blockers are useful for preventing angina attacks and reducing high blood pressure. They reduce the heart's oxygen demand by slowing the heart rate and lowering blood pressure. They are recognized for reducing deaths from heart disease and from heart surgeries, including angiography and coronary bypass. Beta-blockers are the drugs of choice for older patients with stable angina and may also be beneficial for people with silent ischemia. They are, however, less useful for the treatment of Prinzmetal’s angina. Beta-blockers are often prescribed along with other drugs such as nitrates, calcium channel blockers, or statins. A 2006 study suggested that beta-blockers and statins may help stabilize coronary artery disease and prevent the development of heart attacks.

Specific Beta-blockers. Beta-blockers include propranolol (Inderal), carvedilol (Coreg), bisoprolol (Zebeta), acebutolol (Sectral), atenolol (Tenormin), labetalol (Normodyne, Trandate), metoprolol (Lopressor, Toprol-XL), and esmolol (Brevibloc). A nasal spray form of propranolol appears to be very helpful in reducing exercise-induced angina attacks.

Side Effects. Beta-blocker side effects include fatigue, lethargy, vivid dreams and nightmares, depression, memory loss, and dizziness. They can lower HDL (“good”) cholesterol. Beta blockers are categorized as non-selective or selective. Non-selective beta blockers such as carvedilol and propranolol can narrow bronchial airways. These beta-blockers should not be used by patients with asthma, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis.

Patients should never abruptly stop taking these drugs. The sudden withdrawal of beta-blockers can rapidly increase heart rate and blood pressure. The doctor may advise a patient to slowly decrease the dose before stopping completely.

Calcium channel blockers reduce heart rate and slightly dilate the blood vessels of the heart, thereby decreasing oxygen demand and increasing oxygen supply. They also reduce blood pressure. CCBs vary chemically, however, and although some are helpful, others may even be dangerous for certain patients with angina.

Click the icon to see an image of the anterior heart arteries.

Long-acting nifedipine (Adalat, Procardia) and nisoldipine (Sular) and newer CCBs, such as amlodipine (Norvasc) and nicardipine (Cardene), may be beneficial for some patients with angina. They can be considered alone for patients who cannot tolerate beta-blockers, but may provide the best results when used in combination with a beta-blocker. Studies suggest that they reduce the need for repeat angioplasties. Their effects on other outcomes, including mortality rates and heart attack, are less clear.
Short-acting CCBs, including short-acting forms of verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine, and nicardipine, are helpful for many patients with Prinzmetal's angina. However, short-acting forms of certain CCBs, such as nifedipine and nisoldipine, have been associated with severe and even dangerous side effects, including an increase in heart attacks and sudden death in some patients with unstable angina. They also increase the risk for adverse effects in patients with stable angina. Short-acting CCBs are, therefore, not used for stable or unstable angina.

There is no strong evidence that any calcium channel blockers improve survival rates. Overdose can cause dangerously low blood pressure and slow heart beats. Patients with heart failure have a higher risk for death with these drugs and should not take them. No one taking any calcium channel blocker should withdraw abruptly because such action could dangerously increase the risk of high blood pressure. Note: Grapefruit and Seville oranges boost the effects of CCBs, sometimes to toxic levels. (Regular oranges do not appear to pose any hazard.)

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are important heart-protective drugs, particularly for people with diabetes and high blood pressure. They reduce the production of angiotensin, a chemical that causes arteries to narrow, and so are commonly used to lower blood pressure. They may also reduce risk for heart attack, stroke, complications of diabetes, and death in patients at high risk for heart disease.

ACE inhibitors include captopril (Capoten), ramipril (Altace), enalapril (Vasotec), quinapril (Accupril), benazepril (Lotensin), perindopril (Aceon), and lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril).

Side Effects. Side effects of ACE inhibitors are uncommon but may include an irritating cough, excessive drops in blood pressure, and allergic reactions. In the past, doctors sometimes avoided giving aspirin to patients who were taking ACE inhibitors because the combination was believed to cause kidney problems. But, a 2005 study of patients with both coronary artery disease and heart failure found that taking aspirin and ACE inhibitord together is safe. The researchers also noted that taking aspirin with an ACE inhibitor can significantly reduce the risk of death for older patients with CAD and heart failure. [See In-Depth Report #14: High blood pressure.]

In 2004, the National Cholesterol Education Program issued updated recommendations on how to control cholesterol levels. These guidelines emphasize that patients should lower their LDL (“bad”) cholesterol and recommend that more people take LDL-lowering medication. Lowering LDL cholesterol and raising HDL (“good”) cholesterol can significantly reduce the risks of heart disease. Several different types of drugs (statins, bile-acid binding resins, niacin, and fibrates) are used to treat cholesterol. [See In-Depth Report #23: Cholesterol.]

Statins are the most important of these drugs. Brands include lovastatin (Mevacor), pravastatin (Pravachol), simvastatin (Zocor), fluvastatin (Lescol), atorvastatin (Lipitor), and rosuvastatin (Crestor). A major analysis of over 200 studies found that statins reduced the risk for heart problems by 60% and stroke by 17%. A 2005 review found that the more that statins lower LDL, the more they reduce CAD and other heart disease risks.

An important 2006 study found that aggressive treatment with statins may have the potential to reverse coronary artery disease. In the study, rosuvastatin reduced fatty plaque in the arteries in addition to improving LDL and HDL cholesterol levels. However, a follow-up 2007 study of rosuvastatin indicated that while the drug slowed the rate of atherosclerotic progression, it did not reverse heart disease. Future studies will continue to investigate this issue.

Side effects of statins may include stomach upset, headaches, skin rashes, muscle aches, sexual dysfunction, drowsiness, dizziness, nausea, constipation, and peripheral neuropathy (numbness or tingling in the hands and feet).

The main safety concern with statins is an uncommon condition called myopathy, which can cause muscle and joint pain and possible muscle damage. Doctors will immediately stop statin therapy if myopathy occurs. Patients should talk to their doctor about any unusual muscle discomfort or weakness, or if their urine becomes brown-colored. Statins can also affect the liver, particularly at higher doses, so patients taking these drugs should receive regular liver function tests.

Click the icon to see an image of cholesterol.

Influenza Vaccinations (Flu Shots). Evidence suggests influenza vaccinations help protect against adverse heart events (including after heart surgeries), stroke, and death from all causes in the elderly. Still, studies suggest that only two-thirds of at risk people are vaccinated, mostly because of unwarranted fears of ineffectiveness or adverse effects.

Antibiotics. Researchers have investigated antibiotics for treating patients with heart disease and past infection of the bacteria Chlamydia pneumoniae. Results from several recent large-scale clinical trials suggest that antibiotic treatment provides no benefit in preventing heart attack or other cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. In addition, a 2006 study indicated that short-term treatment with the antibiotic clarithromycin may increase the risk for death in patients with coronary artery disease. While it is still possible that C. pneumoniae may play a role in triggering inflammatory responses associated with ACS, antibiotic therapy is no longer considered appropriate for treatment or prevention of heart disease.

Ranolazine (Ranexa) was approved in 2006 for treatment of chronic angina. It is recommended for patients who have not responded to other angina drugs. Ranolazine is taken in combination with amlodipine, beta blockers, or nitrates. The drug appears to work better in men than in women

Gene Therapy and Angiogenesis. Proteins known as growth factors are being investigated for their ability to grow new blood vessels for supplying oxygen to the heart. After promising small trials, two large studies of genetically engineered forms of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF [GenerX]) failed to detect any benefits. Studies on therapies that actually genetically encode these proteins are underway.

Testosterone Supplements. Some trials using testosterone supplements or patches have reported improved exercise-induced blood flow in the coronary arteries and improvement in angina in some cases. Supplements of this male hormone, however, may increase the risk for prostate cancer. Experts suggest that testosterone be used only in older men with significant deficiencies in testosterone.

Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators (SERMs). Selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs), including raloxifene (Evista), have been designed to produce the benefits of estrogen without its risks. They are thought to act like estrogen in some tissues but behave like estrogen blockers (antiestrogens) in others. Raloxifene may have some heart benefits, although it poses a risk for deep vein blood clots, which may have long-term implications for patients with heart problems. A major study is underway to determine its effects on the heart.

Surgery

Surgery is usually recommended for patients who have:

Unstable angina that does not respond promptly to medical treatment
Severe recurrent episodes of angina that last more than 20 minutes
Acute coronary syndrome
Severe coronary artery disease (severe angina, multi-artery involvement, evidence of ischemia), particularly if abnormalities are evident in the left ventricle of the heart, the main pumping chamber

Atherosclerosis is a disease of the arteries in which fatty material is deposited in the vessel wall, resulting in narrowing and eventual impairment of blood flow. Severely restricted blood flow in the arteries to the heart muscle leads to symptoms such as chest pain. Atherosclerosis shows no symptoms until a complication occurs.

Researchers have been investigating whether surgery offers any advantages if used as an early treatment for mild angina. A major analysis in 2003 reported that the use of angioplasty in patients with mild heart blockage did not reduce the risk for heart attack or death over the long term. A landmark 2007 study found that angioplasty was no better than drug therapy for preventing heart attack and stroke in patients with stable coronary artery disease. (For more information, see Angioplasty and Stents.)

Two effective surgical procedures for heart patients are:

Coronary artery bypass grafting (commonly called bypass or CABG)
Percutaneous coronary intervention (commonly called angioplasty or PCI), usually with coronary artery stent placement

Click the icon to see an image about bypass grafting.

Each of these procedures is described below.

Studies have generally reported similar survival rates with either procedure. There are some differences, however, and decision often depends on individual conditions. Patients considering surgery should discuss all options and risks with their doctor. No surgical procedure cures coronary artery disease, and patients must continue to rigorously maintain a healthy lifestyle and any necessary medications. For some patients, lifestyle changes and medications may be able to control the disease without surgery or angioplasty.

Considerations for Choosing Angioplasty with Stent Placement. Angioplasty has the following advantages for most patients. It is:

Less invasive than bypass. (Although a minimally invasive variation of bypass surgery may reduce this distinction.)
Less expensive than bypass. (Although the postoperative need for more medications and the high risk for repeat procedures to reopen the artery may reduce the long-term difference in cost between the two procedures.)
Life-saving emergency procedure for many patients with heart attacks. (The use of bypass after a heart attack has much higher mortality rates than when it is used electively and its use is controversial in heart attack patients.)

It has the following disadvantages:

The blood vessels can close up again (restenosis) so that patients require additional procedures. (New blood thinning drugs, coronary stent coatings, and radiation treatments may help to significantly reduce restenosis rates. However, there is also some indication that stents, especially drug-eluting stents, may increase the risk for blood clots.)
It is not as appropriate as bypass for many patients with angina (people with diabetes, elderly patients, or those with multi-vessel blockage). Increasingly, however, angioplasty is proving to be as safe and as effective as bypass in many high-risk patients. Patients should be sure to discuss with their doctors the relevant risks and benefits of angioplasty and bypass.

Considerations for Choosing Bypass. Bypass is usually the appropriate procedure in patients with high-risk conditions, such as:

Multi-vessel blockage. (In one report comparing surgery to angioplasty in patients with two or three blocked vessels, the mortality rate 1 year after bypass was 0.8% and after angioplasty was 2.5%. About 80% of patients in the study were men.)
Diabetes. (Bypass produces significantly higher survival rates in these patients. Some experts believe angioplasty should rarely, if ever, be used in this population.)
Being elderly.
Certain structural features, such as a left main artery narrowed by 50% or more or a very long diseased portion of the artery.

Considerations for Women. Studies have reported higher mortality rates in women than in men after any heart surgery. Some experts theorize that on average women may be older and sicker when they have a heart operation. A 2002 study, however, suggested that when women with acute coronary syndromes are given the same aggressive and early treatment as men are, their survival rates are equal or even better.

In addition to angioplasty and bypass procedures, a number of other procedures are available or under investigation for coronary artery disease. They include:

Atherectomy
Myocardial Laser Revascularization
Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP)

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is a good alternative to angioplasty for many patients, but it is very invasive. The surgery involves the following processes:

Click the icon to see an animation about CABG.

The chest is opened, and the blood is rerouted through a lung-heart machine.
The heart is stopped during the procedure.
Large blood vessels supply the grafts, which are used to reroute the blood. The blood vessel grafts are transplanted in front of and beyond the blocked arteries, so the blood flows through the new vessels around the blockage.
The standard grafts now use arteries taken from the chest wall. Studies are reporting that with such grafts arteries remain open in 90% of cases after 15 years.
In general, patients with triple bypass procedures stay in the hospital for 5 days. Those with one-vessel bypass may be able to go home in 3 days.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a heart bypass surgery.

In spite of the invasive nature of this procedure, elective bypass procedures produce better long-term survival rates than angioplasty, particularly in patients with diabetes and multi-vessel blockage. Overall mortality rates after this procedure range from 1% to slightly over 2%. The risk for stroke or heart attack after a bypass operation ranges from 1.3 - 5%. Finding a surgeon who performs at least 100 of the procedures a year helps reduce the risk for complications.

Blood clots may form in the new graft, closing it up or narrowing the treated vessel over time. Therapy with aspirin and other anti-clotting drugs help keep the graft open and working properly. For long-term prevention of closure, as well as for slowing progression of atherosclerosis, aggressive treatment with cholesterol-lowering drugs may be more beneficial than standard anti-clotting drugs.

Bleeding is also a potential complication of CABG. Anti-bleeding (also called hemorrhage-sparing) drugs are sometimes used to limit blood loss in patients who undergo this surgery. In 2006, concerns were raised about one of these drugs, aprotinin (Trasylol). Data suggested that aprotinin seriously increased the risks for kidney failure, heart failure, and stroke.

An important study, published in 2007 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, compared aprotinin with two anti-fibrinolytic drugs, aminocaproic acid (Amicar) and tranexamic acid (Cyklokapron), which are also used to control blood loss. The study of nearly 4,000 patients who had CABG found that over a 5-year period, the death rate for patients who took aprotinin was 21%, and patients had a 48% increased risk of dying. By comparison, the death rate was 16% for aminocaproic acid, 15% for tranexamic acid, and 13% for no anti-bleeding drug. Because aprotinin is more expensive as well as potentially more dangerous than other anti-bleeding drugs, experts are now recommending against its use in CABG.

Minimally invasive bypass (also called buttonhole or keyhole bypass) surgeries are exciting advances in basic bypass surgery. Studies indicate good success of these procedures for patients with disease in single vessels. They are also being investigated for multiple vessels.

One variation of minimally invasive bypass uses a four-inch incision. The surgeon works on the front of the heart while it is beating slowly. To date, there have been no differences in cardiac events or later mental complications between this so-called off-pump procedure and the standard bypass procedure.
In another variation, the heart is stopped, and the patient is put on a machine that reroutes the blood through a device that keeps it oxygenated. Fiberoptic scopes and instruments are passed through a number of finger-sized incisions. The surgeon works on all sides of the heart, guided by a video image from a tiny camera inserted through a 4-inch incision.
Some advanced heart centers now use robotic systems, which allow the surgeon to perform extremely delicate maneuvers on tiny vessels through pencil-size incisions. They are not yet used for the whole bypass process.

Eventually, minimally invasive bypass procedures may prove to be less expensive, require a shorter hospital stay, and have fewer complications than conventional coronary artery bypass surgery -- or even angioplasty. At this time, however, they are experimental procedures, performed in only a few medical centers for select candidates. Long term-success rates are unknown.

Angioplasty and Stents

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), also called angioplasty, involves procedures such as percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) that help open the blocked artery.

Click the icon to see an animation about percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

A typical angioplasty procedure follows these steps:

The cardiologist threads a narrow catheter (a tube) containing a catheter into the blocked vessel.
The doctor opens the blocked vessel using balloon angioplasty, in which the surgeon passes a tiny deflated balloon through the catheter to the vessel.
The balloon is inflated to compress the plaque against the walls of the artery, flattening it out so that blood can once again flow through the blood vessel freely.
In order to keep the artery open afterwards, surgeons use a device called a coronary stent, an expandable metal mesh tube that is implanted during angioplasty at the site of the blockage. (In some cases, a stent may be used as the initial opening device instead of balloon angioplasty.)
Once in place, the stent pushes against the wall of the artery to keep it open.

Click the icon to see an animation about percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Complications occur in about 10% of patients (about 80% within the first day). Outcomes are better in hospital settings with experienced teams and backup.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing coronary artery balloon angioplasty surgery.

The most important long-term complication is reclosure (restenosis), which can lead to heart attack if not treated with a repeat procedure. Stenting and other advances have helped significantly in preventing reclosure and reducing heart attack rates. Nevertheless, a repeat procedure is still needed to restore the opening in 10 - 15% of procedures that use stents.

PCI (angioplasty) has been proven to help reduce the frequency of angina attacks. It is commonly recommended for patients who have critically blocked arteries or have already had a recent, acute heart attack. PCI can also help improve survival and prevent heart attacks in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, doctors have been uncertain about angioplasty’s benefits for survival and heart attack prevention in lower-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease.

In 2007, a landmark study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine and presented at the 2007 meeting of the American College of Cardiology. The COURAGE study found that PCI works no better than standard heart medication (drugs to control blood pressure, lower cholesterol, and prevent blood clots) in preventing heart attack, stroke, and hospitalization in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Based on this study’s findings, experts are now recommending angioplasty only for patients who have severe heart disease. For patients with stable heart disease, drug therapy may be sufficient enough treatment and allow them to safely defer having surgery.

Angioplasty is less invasive than bypass surgery, requiring only one night in the hospital. Recuperation takes about a week. Chest pain after the procedure is very common and usually due to problems other than ischemia. Mild chest pain is even more common when a stent is used, possibly because the artery is stretched.

Reclosure of the artery during or shortly after angioplasty often occurs. A number of anti-clotting drugs are used to help prevent this.

Aspirin and the anti-platelet drug clopidogrel (Plavix) are often used to prevent reclosure during the procedure.
A high dose of the anticoagulant heparin is typically given before the operation.
Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, powerful drugs that block platelets, also prevent reclosure after stenting in many high-risk patients, and evidence now strongly suggests that they reduce rates of heart attack and death. Eptifibatide (Integrilin) and tirofiban (Aggrastat) are the standard drugs used during angioplasty. They may be most effective if administered during angioplasty, rather than beforehand.

All of these drugs pose a risk for bleeding complications.

Narrowing or reclosing of the artery (restenosis) can occur within a year of angioplasty or even longer in 15 - 60% of angioplasty patients. Coronary stents, anti-clotting drugs, and other advances have reduced these events significantly, but have not eliminated the problem. Theories for the cause of restenosis include:

The release of oxidants (damaging unstable particles) at the surgical site may cause injury and activate immune factors that produce cellular overgrowth in smooth muscles of the blood vessels.
Other activities, including scarring, may remodel and narrow the blood vessels. (This is most likely the reason for restenosis in patients with stents.)

Symptoms of restenosis include chest pain on exertion. (Heart attacks, however, do not usually occur with such events.) The narrowing of the artery in this case is not due to blood clots, so anti-clotting drugs are not useful. Restenosis usually requires a repeat operation. A number of approaches, mostly investigative, have been developed to prevent restenosis after angioplasty.

Drug-Coated Stents. Stents coated with the drugs sirolimus (Rapamune) or paclitaxel (Taxol) have been increasingly used in the last several years. Drug-eluting stents (as they are also called) can help prevent restenosis. However, because drug-eluting stents reduce arterial tissue growth, they can increase the risks of blood clots. In late 2006, the FDA held several meetings to discuss the increased risks of blood clots associated with drug-eluting stents. The committees found that drug-eluting stents do appear to have a small increased risk of blood clots compared to bare metal stents, but not enough research has been conducted to fully determine their risks for heart attack and death.

Five studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine in March 2007 indicated that drug-eluting stents are safe and effective for patients with coronary artery disease when they are used for FDA-approved indications. Problems have arisen when these stents are used for “off-label” purposes in patients with more complicated health problems. There is still some concern as to whether all stents (both bare metal and drug eluting) are used too frequently for patients who may be better served by drugs or bypass surgery.

In February 2007, the American Heart Association and other professional organization issued an extremely important joint advisory statement. The statement advises that all patients who have drug-eluting stents must continue to take aspirin and clopidogrel (or, rarely, ticlopidine) for at least 1 year after the stent is inserted to reduce the risk of blood clots. Clopidogrel and ticlopidine are thienopyridine drugs that, like aspirin, help prevent blood platelets from clumping together. It is very important that patients who have drug-eluting stents take both aspirin and a thienopyridine drug. If for some reason patients cannot take a thienopyridine drug, they should receive a bare metal stent instead of a drug-eluting stent.

Coronary Artery Brachytherapy. Radiation treatment called coronary artery brachytherapy (Gamma One, Beta-Cath) can slow the cell growth in the arteries that causes restenosis. With this approach, any blockage in the stent is first removed, and a tube with an inflatable balloon is inserted. The surgeon then implants a temporary device that delivers radiation. Brachytherapy has shown excellent results in preventing restenosis and significantly reducing heart events and improving survival. Brachytherapy is also showing promise in preventing restenosis in stented artery grafts that were put in place after bypass surgery and later failed. However, several 2006 studies in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that drug-coated stents may work better than brachytherapy in preventing restenosis in failed stents. In these studies, the drug-coated stents were inserted inside the original bare metal stents.

Medications. A number of medications are being studied for prevention of restenosis, although benefits to date have been modest. Other drugs under investigation include statins, various anti-clotting drugs, and B vitamins.

Other Procedures. Other procedures under investigation to keep the arteries open use ultrasound, "soft" x-rays, and cryotherapy (very low temperatures).

Other Treatments

Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR) applies laser energy directly to areas in the heart where blockage has occurred, creating 10 - 50 tiny channels. TMLR is recommended for patients with severe angina who have not responded to surgical bypass or angioplasty procedures. TMLR is not suitable for patients who have severely damaged heart muscles. A variant called percutaneous transmyocardial laser revascularization uses a small laser (a holmium YAG laser), which is smaller than the device used in TMLR and does not require open chest surgery and a general anesthetic.

Patients report improved symptoms and exercise tolerance. Both procedures carry risks for serious complications, however, including some that can be life-threatening. It is not clear if either TMLR procedure improves survival, and, in one study, the quality of life afterwards was less than with standard heart surgeries.

A noninvasive technique called enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) has been used successfully by over a million people in China. The technique uses an air pump that inflates and deflates pressurized cuffs around the legs, causing blood to be pushed into the heart.

EECP may help patients with angina who have not had pain relief from nitrate drugs and who do not qualify as candidates for bypass or angioplasty. In different studies, it has relieved angina in over 75% of patients who used it and reduced the need for medication. The benefits persist, and there is some evidence that it produces actual cellular changes that benefit the heart. In 2002, the FDA approved EECP for the treatment of heart failure but some insurance companies still consider its use “experimental” and will not pay for it. EECP is not recommended for patients with arrhythmia, serious heart valve problems, or peripheral artery disease.

Atherectomy procedures clear the narrowed arteries by using an approach called debulking. All of these procedures use a catheter (a thin tube) that is inserted into an artery (usually in the groin) and threaded up to the blockage. Devices are inserted through the tube to remove the plaque. They include:

Rotational atherectomy, which uses a tiny cutter spinning at 2,500 rpm
Extractional atherectomy, which "shaves" the plaque
Directional atherectomy, which slices the plaques

Although they are successful in opening arteries, they offer no advantages over standard angioplasty and are used only for special cases.

Resources

www.nhlbi.nih.gov -- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
www.americanheart.org -- American Heart Association
www.acc.org -- American College of Cardiology

References

Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al. Optimalmedical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 26; [Epub ahead of print]

Crouse JR 3rd, Raichlen JS, Riley WA, Evans GW, Palmer MK, O'Leary DH, et al. Effect of rosuvastatin on progression of carotid intima-media thickness in low-risk individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis: the METEOR Trial. JAMA. 2007 Mar 28;297(12):1344-53. Epub 2007 Mar 25.

Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Kong DF, Shaw LK, Tuttle RH, Mark DB, et al. Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. JAMA. 2007 Jan 10;297(2):159-68. Epub 2006 Dec 5.

Folsom AR, Chambless LE, Ballantyne CM, Coresh J, Heiss G, Wu KK, et al. An assessment of incremental coronary risk prediction using C-reactive protein and other novel risk markers: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jul 10;166(13):1368-73.

Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH; CATSCAN Study Investigators. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA. 2006 Jul 26;296(4):403-11.

Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey DE Jr, Gardner TJ, Lockhart PB, Moliterno DJ, et al. Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians. Circulation. 2007 Feb 13;115(6):813-8. Epub 2007 Jan 15.

Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Pache J, Kaiser C, Valgimigli M, Kelbaek H, et al. Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1030-9. Epub 2007 Feb 12.

Lagerqvist B, James SK, Stenestrand U, Lindback J, Nilsson T, Wallentin L; SCAAR Study Group. Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1009-19. Epub 2007 Feb 12.

Lloyd-Jones DM, Liu K, Tian L, Greenland P. Narrative review: Assessment of C-reactive protein in risk prediction for cardiovascular disease. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jul 4;145(1):35-42.

Maisel WH. Unanswered questions--drug-eluting stents and the risk of late thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):981-4. Epub 2007 Feb 12.

Mangano DT, Miao Y, Vuylsteke A, Tudor IC, Juneja R, Filipescu D, et al. Mortality associated with aprotinin during 5 years following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2007 Feb 7;297(5):471-9.

Mangano DT, Tudor IC, Dietzel C; Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group; Ischemia Research and Education Foundation. The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 26;354(4):353-65.

Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, Ho KK, D'Agostino R, Cutlip DE. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1020-9. Epub 2007 Feb 12.

Mosca L, Banka CL, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bushnell C, Dolor RJ, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women: 2007 update. Circulation. 2007 Mar 20;115(11):1481-501.

Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Sipahi I, Grasso AW, Schoenhagen P, Hu T, et al. Statins, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. JAMA. 2007 Feb 7;297(5):499-508.

Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2007 Feb 6;115(5):e69-171. Epub 2006 Dec 28.

Spaulding C, Daemen J, Boersma E, Cutlip DE, Serruys PW. A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):989-97. Epub 2007 Feb 12.

Stewart JC, Janicki DL, Muldoon MF, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Kamarck TW. Negative emotions and 3-year progression of subclinical atherosclerosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;64(2):225-33.

Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, Schofer J, Dawkins KD, Morice MC, et al. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):998-1008. Epub 2007 Feb 12.

Wang TJ, Gona P, Larson MG, Tofler GH, Levy D, Newton-Cheh C, et al. Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 21;355(25):2631-9.

Review Date:
4/16/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Osteoarthritis

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:34:55 -0700

Overview

Signs and Symptoms
Causes
Risk Factors
Diagnosis
Preventive Care
Treatment
Other Considerations
Supporting Research

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis. It is a joint disease caused by the breakdown of cartilage -- the firm, rubbery tissue that cushions bones at joints.

Healthy cartilage allows bones to glide over one another, and cartilage absorbs energy from the shock of physical movement. In OA cartilage breaks down and wears away. As a result, the bones rub together causing pain, swelling, and stiffness.

OA may also limit the range of motion in affected joints. Most often, OA develops in the hands, knees, hips, and spine.

The disease affects men and women nearly equally. More than 20 million people in the United States have OA. Symptoms tend to appear when individuals are in their 50s and 60s.

Signs and Symptoms

Signs and symptoms of OA may include the following:

Joint pain (often a deep, aching pain) that is worsened by movement and improved with rest (in severe cases, a person may experience constant pain)
Stiffness in the morning or after being inactive for more than 15 minutes
Joint swelling
Joints that are warm to the touch
Crunching or crackling noise when the joint moves (crepitation)
Limited range of motion
Muscle weakness
Abnormal growth of bony knobs near joints which cause deformities (such as Heberden's nodes, in which bumps appear on the outermost finger joints)

Causes

Most of the time, the cause of OA is unknown. It is primarily a disease due to aging. However, metabolic, genetic, chemical, and mechanical factors can play a role in its development.

Risk Factors

Risk factors for OA include:

Increasing age
Genetic predisposition
Obesity
Injury to the joint
History of inflammatory joint disease
Metabolic or hormonal disorders (such as hemochromatosis and acromegaly)
Bone and joint disorders present at birth
Repetitive stressful joint use (such as with occupations like baseball, ballet dancing, and construction work)
Deposits of uric acid crystals in joints

Diagnosis

There is no single test to diagnose OA, so most doctors use a combination of methods to diagnose the disease and rule out the possibility other causes. A physical exam can show limited range of motion, grating of a joint with motion, joint swelling, and tenderness. An x-ray of affected joints will show loss of the joint space and, in advanced cases, wearing down of the ends of the bone and bone spurs.

Preventive Care

The following measures may reduce the risk of developing OA:

Protecting an injured joint from further damage
Exercising
Losing weight
Avoiding excessive repetitive motions

Treatment

The goals of treatment are to relieve pain, maintain or improve joint mobility, increase the strength of the joints, and minimize the disabling affects of the disease. The specific treatment depends upon the affected joints. A combination of conventional treatment and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) may be most effective. Lifestyle approaches, including exercise, and many alternative medical therapies are becoming more popular and are considered safe and effective for the treatment OA.

Several natural remedies are at least as effective as conventional medication for symptom relief, and may help keep the disease from getting worse. Americans spend more on natural remedies for OA than for any other medical condition. Some of the most promising complementary approaches for treating OA include:

Reducing physical stress on the joint (lose weight and improve posture)
Lifestyle changes (particularly exercise)
Supplements including S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), glucosamine and chondroitin, and antioxidants
Herbs with anti-inflammatory properties, including boswellia, devil's claw, ginger, turmeric, white willow bark, and capsaicin (cream)
Acupuncture, including TENS or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Chiropractic
Physical therapy and magnet therapy
Yoga
Tai chi

Exercise

Exercise to strengthen, stretch, and relax muscles around affected joints is almost always included in a treatment plan for OA. Several clinical studies support the value of exercise for people with OA. Clinical studies also suggest that in addition to reduction of pain and disability, exercise improves strength, range of motion, balance and coordination, endurance, and posture.

Medications

The most common type of medication used to treat osteoarthritis are nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). They are common pain relievers that reduce pain and swelling. Types include aspirin, ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil, Nuprin), and naproxen (Aleve, Naprosyn, Anaprox). Although NSAIDs work well, long-term use can cause stomach problems, such as ulcers and bleeding. In April 2005, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked drug manufacturers of NSAIDs to include a warning label on their product that alerts users of an increased risk for stomach bleeding.

Other medications used to treat OA include:

COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) -- Coxibs block an inflammation-promoting enzyme called COX-2. This class of drugs was initially believed to work as well as traditional NSAIDs, but with fewer stomach problems. However, numerous reports of heart attacks and stroke have prompted the FDA to re-evaluate the risks and benefits of the COX-2s. Rofecoxib (Vioxx) and valdecoxib (Bextra) have been withdrawn from the U.S. market following reports of heart attacks in some patients taking the drugs. Celecoxib (Celebrex) is available and labeled with strong warnings and a recommendation that it be prescribed at the lowest possible dose for the shortest duration possible. Patients should ask their doctor whether the drug is appropriate and safe for them.
Corticosteroids -- Also known as steroids, these medications are injected directly into the joint. They may also be used to reduce inflammation and pain. Steroids for inflammation inlclude prednisone (Deltasone) and dexamethasone (Decadron). Steroids, however, may cause side effects, such as weight gain, nausea, and fluid accumulation (edema). Steroids may also cause drug interactions. Ask a pharmacist or doctor.
Artificial joint fluid (Synvisc, Hyalgan) -- These medications can be injected into the knee. They may temporary relief pain for up to 6 months.

Surgery and Other Procedures

Surgery to replace or repair damaged joints may be needed in severe, debilitating cases. Surgical options include:

Arthroplasty (total or partial replacement of the deteriorated joint with an artificial joint)
Arthroscopic surgery to trim torn and damaged cartilage and wash out the joint
Osteotomy (change in the alignment of a bone to relieve stress on the bone or joint)
Arthrodesis (surgical fusion of bones, usually in the spine)

Nutrition and Dietary Supplements

Following these nutritional tips may help reduce symptoms:

Eliminate potential food allergens and foods that increase mucous production, including dairy (milk, eggs, cheese, sour cream, and ice cream), wheat (gluten), soy, corn, potatoes, cabbage, bananas, sugar, preservatives, food additives and excessive salt and meats. Your health care provider may want to test for food sensitivities.
Eat more foods that decrease inflammation, including garlic, onions, watercress, horseradish, mustard, parsley, celery, rose hips tea, pickles, lemon, and anti-inflammatory oils (nuts, seeds, cold-water fish).
Eat more foods containing digestive enzymes, such as papaya and pineapple.
Avoid refined foods, such as white breads, pastas, and sugars.
Eat fewer red meats and more lean meats, cold-water fish, tofu (soy, if no allergy) or beans for protein.
Use healthy cooking oils, such as olive oil or vegetable oil.
Reduce or eliminate trans-fatty acids, found in commercially baked goods such as cookies, crackers, cakes, French fries, onion rings, donuts, processed foods, and margarine.
Avoid coffee and other stimulants, alcohol, and tobacco.
Drink 6 - 8 glasses of filtered water daily.
Exercise moderately, for 30 minutes daily, 5 days a week.

You can address nutritional deficiencies with the following supplements:

Glucosamine/chondroitin, 500 - 1,500 mg daily, for joint health.
Omega-3 fatty acids, such as fish oil, 1 - 2 capsules or 1 tbsp. oil daily, to help decrease inflammation and improve immunity. Higher doses may be used by health care providers.
A multivitamin daily, containing the antioxidant vitamins A, C, D, E, the B-vitamins and trace minerals, such as magnesium, calcium, zinc, and selenium.
Digestive enzymes, 1 - 2 tablets three times daily with meals.
Coenzyme Q10, 100 - 200 mg at bedtime, for antioxidant and immune activity.
N-acetyl cysteine, 200 mg daily, for antioxidant effects.
Acidophilus (Lactobacillus acidophilus), 5-10 billion CFUs (colony forming units) daily, when needed for maintenance of gastrointestinal and immune health. You should refrigerate your acidophilus products.
SAMe (s-adenosyl-L-methionine), 100 - 200 mg before breakfast daily, to help decrease inflammation.

Herbs

Herbs are generally available as standardized, dried extracts (pills, capsules, or tablets), teas, or tinctures/liquid extracts (alcohol extraction, unless otherwise noted). Mix liquid extracts with favorite beverage. Dose for teas is 1-2 heaping teaspoonfuls/cup water steeped for 10 - 15 minutes (roots need longer).

Green tea (Camellia sinensis) standardized extract, 250 - 500 mg daily, for inflammation, and for antioxidant and immune effects. Use caffeine-free products. You may also prepare teas from the leaf of this herb.
Bromelain (Ananus comosus) standardized, 40 mg three times daily, for pain and inflammation.
Turmeric (Curcuma longa) standardardized extract, 300 mg three times a day, for pain and inflammation.
Cat's claw (Uncaria tomentosa) standardized extract, 20 mg three times a day, for inflammation.
Devil's claw (Harpagophytum procumbens) standardized extract, 100 - 200 mg one to two times daily, for inflammation.
Willow bark (Salix alba) standardized extract, 500 mg up to three times daily.

Capsaicin (Capsicum frutescens) Cream

Capsaicin is the main component in hot chili peppers (also known as cayenne). Applied to the surface of the skin, it is believed to deplete stores of a substance that contributes to inflammation and pain in arthritis. Several clinical studies have shown that capsaicin cream provided much better pain relief than a placebo but no improvement in joint swelling, grip strength, or function for people with OA. Pain reduction generally begins 3 - 7 days after applying the capsaicin cream to the skin.

Acupuncture

Several controlled clinical trials suggest that the ancient Chinese practice of acupuncture is an effective treatment for pain associated with OA, as well as for other aspects of the condition, including diminished joint function and reduced walking ability. In fact, a few clinical studies have shown that people with OA experience better pain relief and improvement in function from acupuncture than from NSAIDs such as aspiroxicam.

Chiropractic

Although there is no evidence that chiropractic care can reverse the joint degeneration that causes OA, some clinical studies indicate that spinal manipulation may:

Increase range of motion
Restore normal movement of the spine
Relax the muscles
Improve joint coordination
Reduce pain

A comprehensive review of the scientific literature suggests that chiropractic, especially when combined with glucosamine supplements and rehabilitative stretches and exercise, is an effective supplemental treatment for OA. Chiropractors will avoid using direct thrusts or pressure on red, swollen joints.

Physical Therapy

Physical therapy can be useful to improve muscle strength and the motion at stiff joints. Therapists have many techniques for treating OA.

Manual therapy and supervised exercise may decrease or delay the need for surgery in individuals with OA. In a trial evaluating physical therapy and exercise in people with OA of the knee, participants who received manual therapy to the lumbar spine, hip, ankle, and knees showed the following improvements:

Less stiffness
Reduced pain
Improved functional ability
Improved walking distance
Less need for knee surgery 1 year later

Magnet Therapy

Exposure to electromagnetic fields has boosted the number of cartilage-building cells and substances in laboratory experiments. One important study found that low-energy AC and DC magnetic fields stimulated the production of cartilage. For therapeutic purposes, users can apply magnets in one of two ways: directly to the skin surface over the bone or joint (capacitive coupling) or via pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) which induce an electrical current in the target tissue without making direct contact to the body (inductive coupling).

Clinical studies using either type of magnet therapy for arthritis are limited, and the few that exist have used poor methods, making it difficult to draw any definite conclusions. However, in one study of 78 people with OA of the knee, magnet therapy (applied to the knee for 6 - 10 hours per day over a period of one month) significantly reduced pain as compared with placebo.

Balneotherapy (Hydrotherapy or spa therapy)

Balneotherapy is one of the oldest forms of therapy for pain relief for people with arthritis. The term "balneo" comes from the Latin word for bath (balneum) and refers to bathing in thermal or mineral waters. Sulfur-containing mud baths, for example, have been shown to relieve symptoms of arthritis. However, hydrotherapy, which can be performed under the guidance of certain physical therapists, is occasionally used interchangeably with the word balneotherapy. The goals of balneotherapy for arthritis include:

Improving range of joint motion
Increasing muscle strength
Eliminating muscle spasm
Enhancing functional mobility
Easing pain

Although balneotherapy is most often used for psoriatic or rheumatoid arthritis, some medical experts believe that it may be beneficial for OA as well. However, one large review of clinical trials found little evidence to support its use.

Ice Massage, Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation (TENS), and Electroacupuncture

In a well-designed trial comparing the effectiveness of TENS, electroacupuncture, and ice massage for the treatment of knee OA, each of these methods were found to:

Reduce pain at rest
Reduce stiffness
Boost walking speed
Increase quadriceps muscle strength
Increase knee range of motion

TENS is a technique used by many physical therapists. When the nerve stimulation of TENS is applied to acupuncture points, it is called electroacupuncture.

Mechanical Aids

A variety of mechanical devices, called orthoses, are available for people with OA to help support and protect joints. Made from lightweight metal leather, elastic, foam, and plastic, orthoses allow some movement within the affected joint and do not restrict nearby joints. For example, splints or braces help align joints and properly distribute weight. Shock-absorbing soles in shoes can help in daily activities and during exercise. Physical therapists use these mechanical aids most frequently to treat arthritic hands, wrists, knees, ankles, and feet. Orthoses should be custom-fitted by a physical or occupational therapist.

Homeopathy

Although very few studies have examined the effectiveness of specific homeopathic therapies, professional homeopaths may consider the following treatments to alleviate respiratory symptoms (such as those experienced from cystic fibrosis) based on their knowledge and experience. Before prescribing a remedy, homeopaths take into account a person's constitutional type -- your physical, emotional, and psychological makeup. An experienced homeopath assesses all of these factors when determining the most appropriate treatment for each individual.

Although people with OA are best treated with an individualized homeopathic remedy chosen by a professional homeopath, several trials have found that some common homeopathic combinations may be at least as effective as conventional medications for OA. Potential remedies include:

A topical homeopathic gel containing comfrey (Symphytum officinale), poison ivy (Rhus toxicodendron), and marsh-tea (Ledum palustre)
A combination homeopathic preparation containing R. toxicodendron., Arnica montana (arnica), Solanum dulcamara (climbing nightshade), Sanguinarra canadensis (bloodroot), and Sulphur
A liquid homeopathic preparation containing R. toxicodendron, Causticum (potassium hydrate), and Lac vaccinum (cow's milk)

Other Common Homeopathic Remedies for OA Include:

Calcarea carbonica (carbonate of lime or calcium carbonate)
Bryonia (wild hops)
Graphites
Guaiacum

Mind-Body Medicine

Chronic pain and disability can make daily functioning difficult. A holistic approach to care in these clinical circumstances may positively affect both lifestyle and how one feels overall. Many people report that relaxation techniques, such as guided imagery and meditation, are an important part of comprehensive, holistic care, and help to alleviate pain and other symptoms of OA.

Yoga

This ancient Indian practice is well known for its physical, psychological, emotional, and spiritual benefits and is often recommended in the West to relieve musculoskeletal symptoms. In one clinical trial studying OA of the hand, the group practicing yoga showed significant decrease in pain and improved range of motion compared to those participating in non-yoga stretching and strengthening sessions. Certain yoga "asanas" (postures) strengthen the quadriceps and emphasize stretching, both of which benefit people with OA of the knee. People with arthritis should begin asanas slowly and they should be performed only after a warm up. Yoga is best performed under the careful guidance of a reputable instructor.

Tai Chi

This ancient form of classical conditioning practiced in China for centuries has been reported in clinical studies to produce a number of benefits, including the following:

Improved fitness
Increased muscular strength
Enhanced flexibility
Reduced percentage of body fat
Diminished risk of falls in the elderly

In a clinical trial of subjects with OA of the knee or hip (ranging in age from 49 - 81), those who practiced tai chi twice a week for 3 months showed significant improvement compared to those in the control group in the following areas:

Overall sense of quality of life
Diminished feelings of stress/tension
Increased satisfaction with general health
Decreased fatigue
Easier self management of arthritis symptoms

Other Considerations

Pregnancy

Many of the herbs used in treatment for OA have not been tested on pregnant women and some are known to be unsafe for women who are pregnant. For this reason, pregnant women should take substances for pain and other symptoms only under the supervision of their obstetrician.

Prognosis and Complications

Complications of OA include:

Inability to walk due to very advanced hip or knee OA
Gastrointestinal bleeding and decreased kidney function resulting from long-term NSAID use

Many people are able to control OA and prevent the condition from worsening over time. Joint deterioration in OA tends to be slower than that of rheumatoid arthritis, but knee OA is still the number one cause of disability in industrialized countries such as the United States. Increased fluid in joints and joint enlargement occur later in the course of the disease. In the most advanced stages, OA can cause full cartilage loss. In some cases joint replacement may become necessary. While OA can be a debilitating condition, current treatments have shown great promise in reducing pain and improving mobility.

Supporting Research

Bijlsma JW, Knahr K. Strategies for the prevention and management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. BestPract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21(1):59-76.

Chrubasik JE, Roufogalis BD, Chrubasik S. Evidence of effectiveness of herbal antiinflammatory drugs in the treatment of painful osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain. Phytother Res. 2007;21(7):675-83.

Clark KL. Nutritional considerations in joint health. Clin Sports Med. 2007;26(1):101-18.

Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Concato J, Wittink DR. Treatment options in knee osteoarthritis: the patient’s perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jun;164(12):1299-1304.

Frech TM, Clegg DO. The utility of nutraceuticals in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007;9(1):25-30.

Gorsline RT, Kaeding CC. The use of NSAIDs and nutritional supplements in athletes with osteoarthritis: prevalence, benefits and consequences. Clin Sports Med.2005 Jan;24(1):71-82.

Kolasinski SL, Garfinkel M, Tsai AG, Matz W, Dyke AV, Schumacher HR. Iyengar yoga for treating symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knees: a pilot study. J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Aug;11(4):689-693.

Laufer S. Osteoarthritis therapy -- are there still unmet needs? Rheumatology. 2004 Feb;43;Suppl 1:i9-15.

Lee C, Straus WL, Balshaw R, Barlas S, Vogel S, Schnitzer TJ. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents versus acetaminophen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Oct;51(5)746-54.

Leeb BF, Schweitzer KM, Smolen JS. A metaanalysis of chondroitin sulfate in the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(1):205-211.

Lin J, Zhang W, Jones A, Doherty M. Efficacy of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of osteoarthritis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2004 Aug;329(7461):324.

Long L, Ernst E. Homeopathic remedies for the treatment of osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Br Homeopath J. 2001;90:37-43.

Mehta K, Gala J, Bhasale S, et al. Comparison of glucosamine sulfate and a polyherbal supplement for the relief of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN25438351]. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007;7(1):34 [Epub ahead of print].

Morelli V, Naquin C, Weaver V. Alternative therapies for traditional disease states: osteoarthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Jan;67(2):339-344.

Neugebauer V, Han JS, Adwanikar H, Fu Y, Ji G. Techniques for assessing knee joint pain in arthritis. Mol Pain. 2007;3:8.

Owens S, Wagner P, Vangsness CT. Recent advances in glucosamine and chondroitin supplementation. J Knee Surg. 2004 Oct;17(4):185-193.

Piscoya J, Rodriguez Z, Bustamante SA, Okuhama NN, Miller MJ, Sandoval M. Efficacy and safety of freeze-dried cat's claw in osteoarthritis of the knee: mechanisms of action of the species Uncaria guianensis. Inflamm Res. 2001;50(9):442-448.

Reginster JY, Bruyere O, Neuprez A. Current role of glucosamine in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2007;46(5):731-5.

Sun BH, Wu CW, Kalunian KC. New developments in osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33(1):135-48.

Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, Shields N, Bruder A. Therapeutic exercise in physiotherapy practice is beneficial: a summary of systematic reviews 2002-2005. Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(1):7-16.

Towheed TE, Anastassiades T. Glucosamine therapy for osteoarthritis: an update. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(9):1787-90.

Wise CM. Crystal-associated arthritis in the elderly. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33(1):33-55.

Witt C, Brinkhaus B, Jena S, et al. Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2005 Jul;366(9480):136-143.

Review Date:
11/30/2007
Reviewed By:
Ernest B. Hawkins, MS, BSPharm, RPh, Health Education Resources; and Steven D. Ehrlich, NMD, private practice specializing in complementary and alternative medicine, Phoenix, AZ. Review provided by VeriMed Healthcare Network.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Colon and rectal cancers

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:05 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Causes
Symptoms
Risk Factors
Dietary Factors
Prevention
Diagnosis
Staging
Prognosis
Surgery
Medications
Radiation Treatment
Follow-up Testing
Treatment for Metastasized ...
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Drug Approval

In September 2006, the Food and Drug Administration approved panitumumab (Vectibix) for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body following chemotherapy. Like cetuximab (Ertibux), panitumumab targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on cancer cells. Panitumumab is the first new colorectal cancer drug approved since 2004. The FDA granted accelerated approval to panitumumab based on a clinical trial of patients with metastatic cancer. The average time to disease progression or death was 96 days in patients treated with panitumumab compared to 60 days in patients who received standard care.

Diet and Colorectal Cancer Recurrence

Evidence indicates that diet plays a role in colorectal cancer prevention. Now, a 2007 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) suggests that dietary factors also affect the risk of cancer recurrence. Patients with stage III colorectal cancer who ate lots of red meat, refined grains, and sweets had a higher risk of cancer recurrence and death than patients whose diets were high in fruits and vegetables, poultry, and fish.

Folic Acid No Good for Prevention?

Many experts have long believed that folic acid supplements may help protect against colorectal cancer. But according to a 2007 JAMA study, high-dose folic acid supplements may not prevent colorectal cancer and may actually increase the risk for adenomatous polyp formation. Adenomatous polyps are benign colorectal tumors that can potentially become cancerous. In the study, patients who took folic acid supplements had a greater risk of developing new, more numerous, and larger adenomatous polyps than patients who did not take the supplements.

NSAIDS Not Recommended for Colorectal Cancer Prevention

In March 2007, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against the routine use of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to prevent colorectal cancer in people who are at average risk for this disease. Several recent studies have indicated that aspirin, and NSAIDs such as celecoxib (Celebrex), can help prevent colorectal cancer. But the USPSTF notes that the risks of these drugs outweigh the benefits. Long-term daily use of NSAIDs increases the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding, kidney function problems, and heart attack and stroke.

Introduction

Cancers of the colon and rectum, often referred to collectively as colorectal cancer, are life-threatening tumors that develop in the large intestine.

More than 80% of colorectal tumors evolve from adenomatous polyps. These gland-like growths develop on the mucous membrane that lines the large intestine. They are usually either:

Tubular polyps, which protrude mushroom-like
Villous adenomas, which are flat and spreading and are more apt to become malignant (cancerous)

Polyps are very common and almost always benign. Their numbers increase with age. Polyps are found in about 25% of people by age 50, and 50% of people by age 75. Fewer than 1% of polyps under 1 centimeter (slightly less than half an inch) become cancerous. About 10% of larger polyps become cancerous within 10 years, and about 25% of these larger polyps become cancerous after 20 years. Certain inherited polyps can become cancerous more rapidly.

Digestion takes place in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, essentially a long tube that extends from the mouth to the anus. It is a complex organ system that first carries food from the mouth down the esophagus to the stomach. Food then travels through the small and large intestines before being excreted through the rectum and out the anus.

The esophagus, stomach, large and small intestine -- aided by the liver, gallbladder, and pancreas -- convert the nutritive components of food into energy and break down the non-nutritive components into waste to be excreted.

The esophagus is a narrow muscular tube, about 9 1/2 inches long that begins below the tongue and ends at the stomach.

In the stomach, acids and stomach motion break food down into particles small enough so that the small intestine can absorb nutrients.

Click the icon to see an image of stomach anatomy.

The small intestine, despite its name, is the longest part of the gastrointestinal tract, extending for about 20 feet. Food passes from the stomach through its three parts: first the duodenum, then the jejunum, and finally the ileum. Most of the digestive process occurs in the small intestine.

Click the icon to see an image of small intestine anatomy.

Undigested material, such as plant fiber, is passed next to the large intestine, mostly in liquid form. The large intestine is wider than the small intestine but only about 6 feet long. It is the final portion of the digestive tract and includes the cecum, the appendix, the colon, and the rectum, which extends to the anus.

Cecum and Appendix. The cecum and the appendix are located in the lower-right quadrant of the abdomen.

Colon. The colon absorbs excess water and salts into the blood. The remaining waste matter is converted to feces through bacterial action. The colon is divided into four major sections.

Click the icon to see an image of large intestine anatomy.

The first section, the ascending colon, extends upward from the cecum on the right side of the abdomen.
The second section, the transverse colon, crosses the upper abdomen to the left side.
The third section extends downward on the left side of the abdomen toward the pelvis and is called the descending colon.
The final section is the sigmoid colon.

Rectum and Anus. Feces are stored in the descending and sigmoid colon until they are passed through the rectum and anus. The rectum extends through the pelvis from the end of the sigmoid colon to the anus.

Causes

In most cases of colon or rectal cancers, the cause or causes are unknown. Defects in genes that normally protect against cancer play the major role in causing polyp cells to continuously spread and become cancerous. Some of these cases are caused by inherited genetic defects, and such patients usually have family histories of colorectal cancer. Most of the genetic mutations involved in colon cancers, however, appear to arise spontaneously (no strong family history) rather than being inherited. In such cases, environmental or other factors trigger genetic changes in the intestine that lead to cancer.

About 6% of cases of colon cancer are due to inherited factors.

APC Gene and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP). When the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene is normal, it helps suppress tumor growth. In its defective form, it permits high levels of the protein beta-catenin to accumulate, which accelerates cell growth leading to polyps. Various genetic mutations that affect the APC gene directly or indirectly have been identified:

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a rare and serious disorder in which the patient inherits an adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutation from either parent. It occurs in about 1 in 8,000 people. During early adulthood, hundreds to thousands of polyps grow in the colon. FAP causes less than 1% of all cases of colorectal cancer, but if untreated, virtually everyone who inherits this condition develops cancer before the age of 40. Many of the deaths attributed to FAP can be prevented with early and aggressive surgical treatment.
Non-inherited mutations of the APC gene have been detected in nearly all patients with spontaneous colon cancers.

Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC). Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome, accounts for at least half of colorectal cancers that run in families. (However, only 3% or less of all colorectal cancers are due to this problem). About 50 - 80% of people who inherit the abnormal gene will develop colon cancer. HNPCC tends to develop in the right side of the colon, often in young individuals. (Left-sided cancers can still occur as well.)

People who inherit HNPCC and other defects are prone to other cancers, including uterine and ovarian cancers, as well as cancers of the small intestine and kidney system (very rare). HNPCC is highly associated with genes containing an abnormality called microsatellite instability (MSI), which is a sign of defective DNA repair. Testing tumors for MSI in people with newly diagnosed colon cancer who also have a family history of the disease may prove to be an effective method for identifying patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Tests are being developed that can detect the actual HNPCC genetic abnormality (mutation) that was inherited from a father or mother. The two most commonly affected genes are MSH2 and MLH1.

Cyclooxygenases and Prostaglandins. Cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 (COX-1 and COX-2) are enzymes involved in the production of prostaglandins, substances produced by the body that cause inflammation, widen and narrow blood vessels, control muscle contractions, and inhibit hormones that regulate fat metabolism. COX-2, but not COX-1, appears to play a role in the development and spread of colorectal tumors. COX-2 increases the levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which, in turn, stimulates factors that inhibit apoptosis, the natural process whereby all cells, including cancerous ones, self-destruct. It also activates interleukin-6 (IL-6), a factor in the immune system that is associated with cancer cell invasion.

C-Reactive Protein (CRP). CRP is another indicator of inflammation. In a 2004 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, elevated CRP levels predicted the development of colon -- but not rectal -- cancer.

Bile Acid Salts. Deoxycholic acid, which is found in the fat-digesting bile salts released by the gallbladder, appears to have carcinogenic properties. Its effects are now believed to play a role in some cases of colon cancer. Levels of the acid can rise as a result of high-fat diets or certain diseases.

Growth Factors. Chronically higher circulating levels of growth factors, including insulin-like growth factor, have been associated with colorectal cancer.

Inflammatory bowel diseases include Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. These chronic disorders cause persistent injuries in the intestinal tract that can, in some cases, produce cancerous changes.

Symptoms

It is possible to have colon or rectal cancer without symptoms. Many patients are free of symptoms until their tumors are quite advanced.

Weight loss and changes in bowel movements are general symptoms for colon cancer, but these symptoms also occur in many other diseases.

Blood in the stools is a common sign of many intestinal cancers. It may appear red if it is fresh or black if it is old. It should be reported to a doctor immediately, even though it is often caused by conditions other than cancer, including:

Hemorrhoids
Minor tears around the rectal or anal areas
Diverticulosis

In addition, stool can change color by:

Eating certain red foods, such as beets or red licorice (red)
Taking iron supplements and medications that have bismuth subsalicylate, most commonly Pepto-Bismol (black)

Nevertheless, blood in the stools is an abnormal finding that should never be ignored. Always report it to your doctor for further advice.

Symptoms of colorectal cancer vary widely depending on the location of the cancer within the large intestine.

Tumors in the Cecum and Ascending Colon (Right Colon). The waste matter in the first portion of the colon is in liquid or semi-liquid form. Tumors that develop here do not change bowel habits or stool formation, but they may cause intermittent or chronic bleeding. Although the stools look normal, patients may develop symptoms of anemia from iron deficiency. Such symptoms include weakness, fatigue, heart palpitations, shortness of breath, and exercise intolerance.

Tumors in the Transverse Colon. As waste material passes across the upper quadrants of the abdomen (the transverse colon), the intestine absorbs water, and the waste matter becomes more solid. In addition to bleeding, tumors here may cause cramps, gas, partial or complete obstruction, and even perforation of the bowel. Anemia can also occur.

Tumors in the Descending Colon and Rectum (Left Colon). When tumors partially block the lower intestine, thin, pencil-shaped stools may form. Bowel habits can change. Tumors in the rectum and lowest part of the intestine can cause pain and a feeling of fullness. Defecation may be painful, or patients may feel the urge to defecate but nothing happens. Bleeding from these locations may be brisk and bright red or maroon, but cancer is often detected before symptoms of chronic anemia develop.

Risk Factors

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the U.S., with Americans facing a lifetime chance of 5.5 - 6% for this cancer. In 2007, colorectal cancer was expected to cause 153,760 new cases and 52,180 deaths in the United States. About 73% of cancers occur in the colon and 27% in the rectum.

The lifetime risk of cancer of the colon or rectum is 5.9% for men and 5.5% for women.

Colorectal cancer risk increases with age. More than 90% of these cancers occur in people over age 50. The rate of colorectal cancer in patients under 20 years is less than 1 in 100,000 per year. At age 50 about 1 in 2,000 people per year will develop colorectal cancer. After age 65, this rate increases to almost 3 in 1,000.

African-Americans have the highest risk of being diagnosed with, and dying from, colorectal cancer. Among Caucasians, Jews of Eastern European (Ashkenazi) descent have an elevated rate of colorectal cancer. Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders, Hispanics/Latinos, and American Indians/Alaska Natives have a lower risk than Caucasians.

About 20 - 25% of colorectal cancers occur among people with a family history of the disease. (Seventy-five percent of cases are due to other causes.) People who have more than one first-degree relative (sibling or parent) with the disease are especially at high risk. The risk is even higher if the relative was diagnosed with colorectal cancer before the age of 60.

About 5 - 10% of patients with colorectal cancer have an inherited genetic abnormality that causes the disease. Genetic mutations associated with colorectal cancer include familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

The risks for colon cancer are far higher in industrialized nations than less developed countries. A Western lifestyle, being sedentary, smoking, and having excess weight have all been associated with increased risk for colorectal cancer. (However, about 75% of cases occur without a known predisposing factor.)

Dietary Factors. Eating a lot of red meat increases the risk for colorectal cancer. Other types of animal protein (low-fat dairy products, fish, poultry) may decrease the risk of developing polyps and colorectal cancer. Studies on fruits, vegetables, and fiber are mixed. Some evidence suggests that diets very low in fruits and vegetables may increase the risk. In any case, eating a variety of fruits and vegetables should be part of a healthy diet.

A 2007 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggested that diet may play a role in colorectal cancer recurrence, as well as prevention. The study evaluated patients with stage III colon cancer who had been treated with surgery and chemotherapy. Patients who ate diets high in red and processed meats, refined grains, and sweets had a higher risk of cancer recurrence and poorer survival than patients whose diets were high in fruits and vegetables, poultry, and fish.

Alcohol and Smoking. Alcohol use and smoking increase the risk for colorectal cancer. Patients who smoke and drink may also be diagnosed with colorectal cancer at a younger age than non-drinkers and non-smokers. Several studies suggest that women who smoke are at especially high risk of developing colorectal cancer.

Obesity. There is a demonstrated link between body mass and colon cancer risk for both men and women. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported that the risk of colon cancer rises as body mass index increases. Obesity has been associated biologically with higher circulating levels of insulin and a hormone called insulin-like growth factor. Chronically high levels of these substances may increase colorectal cancer risk.

Physical Inactivity. More than 50 studies from around the world suggest that physical activity helps prevent colon cancer. In contrast, exercise does not protect against rectal cancer.

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic afflictions of the large intestine known as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Both have been linked to increased risk for colorectal cancer. (Patients with ulcerative colitis have a higher risk than those with Crohn's disease.) Family histories are helpful in determining risk associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Some studies suggest the following:

Patients with IBD who have a family history of colorectal cancer face up to a five-fold risk of colon cancer themselves.
Individuals without IBD who have relatives who suffered from both IBD and colorectal cancer may face a higher risk for developing colorectal cancer themselves.
Individuals without IBD but with a family history of IBD and no colon cancer most likely face no higher risk for cancer themselves.

Crohn's disease, also called regional enteritis, is a chronic inflammation of the intestines that is usually confined to the terminal portion of the small intestine, the ileum. Ulcerative colitis is a similar inflammation of the colon, or large intestine. These and other inflammatory bowel diseases have been linked with an increased risk of colorectal cancer.

Polyps. Polyps are tissue growths, usually benign, that develop in the color or rectum, most often in patients over 50 years of age. When pathologists examine polyps removed from the colon, they classify them as either hyperplastic or adenomatous. Both types are benign, but some adenomas will become malignant. As a preventive measure, polyps should be removed (polypectomy).

Ureterosigmoidostomy. People who have had ureterosigmoidostomy, a surgical procedure to correct a birth defect in the bladder or to treat some bladder cancers, may develop tumors near the site of the defect, which is chronically exposed to urine and feces. Such patients have a 5 - 10% chance of developing colon cancer 15 - 30 years after the operation.

Diabetes. Many studies have identified an association between type 2 diabetes and colon cancer. Both diseases share common risk factors of obesity and physical inactivity, but diabetes itself is a risk factor for colorectal cancer. Both men and women who have diabetes are at risk.

Heart Disease. Coronary artery disease (CAD) increases the risk for colorectal cancer. Both CAD and colorectal cancer share important risk factors, including smoking, high fat diet, sedentary lifestyle, and obesity.

Dietary Factors

Some, but not all, studies have suggested that a high intake of fruits and vegetables can lower the risk for colorectal cancer. One study, for example, reported that these foods do not prevent polyps from forming but may help prevent them from becoming cancerous.

Phytochemicals. Many studies have demonstrated the cancer-fighting effects of plant chemicals called phytochemicals. Fruits and vegetables that contain phytochemicals can often be identified by colors:

Dark green (broccoli, spinach, kale, collard greens, mustard greens). These vegetables contain chemicals called isothiocyanates, which have been associated with a lower risk for cancer in general.
Red (red pepper, tomatoes, watermelon, raspberries, pink grapefruit). Lycopene is a chemical found in these foods that may have strong cancer-protective properties. Cooking tomatoes appears to increase their benefits.
Yellow-orange (carrots, pumpkin, sweet potatoes, oranges, tangerines). The colors in these foods are due to carotenoids. Carotenoids have been associated with health protection, although they may not have much effect on colon cancer itself.
Blue-black (many berries). Dark berries appear to have potent antioxidant chemicals that may be protective against cancer.

Organosulfurs are important food chemicals that are part of the allium family. Studies have reported health benefits from foods containing them. These compounds are found in garlic, leeks, onions, chives, scallions, and shallots. A review of 300 studies concluded that people who eat raw or cooked garlic regularly experience about two-thirds the risk of colorectal cancer as people who eat little or none. Another analysis, however, found the available evidence about garlic to be inconclusive. Garlic supplements, in any case, do not appear to be protective.

Fiber. Studies have been mixed on whether fiber (found in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains) protects the colon from cancer. For example, three major studies in 2002 and 2003 reported no difference in the development of colorectal polyps or cancer recurrence with high intake of fiber. On the other hand, results of the 2003 European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) -- the largest study ever conducted on the role of diet in the development of cancer -- suggested that fiber is protective regardless of its source. However, in the study, the greatest benefits were observed for the left side of the colon and the least for the rectum. In any case, fiber, which is only found in plant products, may be beneficial for the heart and have other health advantages.

The role of fats in inflammatory bowel disease is complex and not fully known. A 2006 study from the Women’s Health Initiative found that a low-fat diet did not help reduce the risk for colorectal cancer. However, the study did not distinguish between types of fat.

Monounsaturated fats (olive, peanut, canola oils; avocados, nuts) and omega-3 polyunsaturated fats (fish, flaxseed oil, walnuts) are the healthiest types of fats.
Saturated fats (red meat, butter, high-fat dairy products) and trans-fats (hydrogenated fat found in snack foods, fried foods, commercial baked goods) are unhealthy types of fats.

Dietary guidelines recommend that adults limit the total fat in their diet to 25 - 35% of total daily calories. Saturated fat intake should be less than 7%, and trans fats less than 1%, of total daily calories. (Patients with heart disease or diabetes may need to limit unhealthy fat in their diet even further.) Most fats should come from polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fat sources.

[See In-Depth Report #43: Heart healthy diet; and #42: Diabetes diet.]

Evidence strongly suggests that red meat raises the risk for colon cancer development, and perhaps also recurrence. Red meat contains dietary iron, which has been associated with a higher risk for colon cancer.

High-temperature cooking (grilling, broiling, or pan-frying) has been specifically associated with increased risk for colon polyps and colon cancer. Overcooking meat increases the amount of carcinogens called heterocyclic amines, which has been associated with cancerous changes.

Milk, Lactose, and Probiotics. In one study, adults who drank the most milk had the lowest risk for colon cancer. A 2004 study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute supported this conclusion. In this review of 10 epidemiologic studies that included more than 500,000 people, those who consumed more milk and calcium had a lower risk of developing colorectal cancer. Milk contains not only calcium but also other compounds, such as lactose, that may help protect against colon cancer.

Yogurt specifically has been associated with a lower risk for colon cancer if it contains live active bacterial cultures, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, that are called probiotics. These "friendly bacteria" appear to protect the colon from cancerous changes. (Acidophilus and other probiotic capsules are also available in health food stores.)

Calcium. Calcium, which is found in dairy products, is associated with colon cancer protection. Many studies have shown a possible protective effect from either high-calcium diets or calcium supplements. However, a 2006 study from the Women’s Health Initiative found that calcium and vitamin D supplements do not reduce women’s colorectal cancer risk. Many doctors still recommend that postmenopausal women take these supplements for bone health.

Obesity has been associated with colon cancer. In some studies of people under 67 years old, the amounts of fat and protein were less important than the total number of calories consumed: the higher the energy intake, the greater the risk for developing colon cancer. In older adults, high calorie intake did not make any significant difference. Other studies have indicated that eating too much sugar may increase the risk for colon cancer.

Studies conducted in several countries have found that drinking four or more cups of coffee a day is associated with a lower risk for colorectal cancer. Green tea may have also beneficial properties, but more research is needed in both of these areas.

Folate and B Vitamins. For years, many doctors have believed that the B vitamin folate (called folic acid) may help protect against colorectal cancer, particularly for people who are genetically predisposed to this disease. Folate is found in beans, citrus fruits, and green vegetables, but some studies have indicated that the greatest protective benefits come from taking supplements.

However, an important study published in 2007 in the Journal of the American Medical Association challenged this assumption. The study suggested that high-dose folic acid supplements do not prevent colorectal cancer, and may actually increase the risk for developing certain types of colorectal tumors. The study evaluated over 1,000 men and women who had a recent history of non-cancerous colorectal polyps. (Adenomatous polyps, also called colorectal ademomas, are the most common type of polyp found in colorectal cancer screenings.) The results indicated that patients who took 1 mg/day of folic acid supplements were more likely to develop new adenomatous polyps than patients who did not take supplements. Patients in the folic acid supplement group were also more likely to have advanced adenomas and more numerous adenomas.

Adenomatous polyps are benign tumors, but they can potentially develop into cancerous tumors. Researchers are continuing to investigate the role that folic acid plays in colorectal cancer risk and prevention. It is possible that folic acid may help prevent the initial appearance of adenomatous polyps, but increase the risk for additional polyp formation once they have begun to occur.

Antioxidant Supplements. Antioxidants are chemicals that help eliminate harmful particles called oxygen-free radicals that have been associated with cancerous changes. Some studies have associated supplements of the antioxidants selenium and vitamins A, C, D, and E with lower colon cancer risk, but most studies have found no protective effect.

Prevention

Studies indicate that daily exercise is one of the best ways to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. The more vigorous the activity, the greater the benefit, but even moderate exercise (walking, stair-climbing) can help reduce colorectal cancer risk. The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends that people engage in at least moderate exercise for 30 minutes or more at least 5 days a week. The ACS also notes that 45 minutes or more of moderate-to-vigorous activity at least 5 days a week may help further reduce cancer risk.

Some studies also suggest that regular exercise may be beneficial for patients who have been diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Two 2006 studies indicated that exercise may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer recurrence and death for patients with stage I - III cancer.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are very common pain relievers that are available over-the-counter and by prescription. They include aspirin, ibuprofen (Motrin), naproxen (Aleve), and the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex). Several studies have reported that NSAIDs help reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. However, regular use of NSAIDs, even in low doses, can increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and stomach ulcers. Long-term use of NSAIDs can also increase the risk for heart attack and stroke, especially in people who have a history of heart disease. Several 2006 and 2007 studies in the New England Journal of Medicine reported that celecoxib prevented precancerous polyps, but the drug more than doubled patients’ risk for heart attack and other cardiovascular events.

A 2005 Nurse’s Health Study found that aspirin, but not other NSAIDs, does provide protection against colorectal cancer. However, the risk was only reduced for women who took 2 aspirin a day for more than 10 years. In addition, this dose level greatly increases the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. Furthermore, a 2007 study in the New England Journal of Medicine suggested that aspirin’s protective effects may only apply to some types of colorectal cancer tumors. Another 2007 study, published in the Lancet, indicated that long-term daily use of aspirin can protect against polyps and colorectal cancer, but experts agree that aspirin’s risks do not outweigh its benefits for most people. (Some people who are at high risk for developing colorectal cancer may benefit from aspirin therapy.)

In March 2007, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against the routine use of aspirin and other NSAIDs to prevent colorectal cancer in people at average risk for this disease. (This recommendation does not apply to people who have a family history of colorectal cancer or who are at high risk for developing colorectal cancer due to other risk factors.) Long-term use of NSAIDs can increase the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding, kidney function problems, and heart problems. Aspirin can also increase the risk for hemorrhagic stroke. Due to these risks, the American Cancer Society and other professional associations also recommend against the use of NSAIDs or other types of medications for colorectal cancer prevention.

Medications containing 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) are sometimes given to patients with ulcerative colitis to help control inflammation. These drugs, which include sulfasalazine and mesalamine, are chemically related to aspirin. A 2005 review of clinical trials found that patients with ulcerative colitis who used 5-ASA were 49% less likely to develop colorectal cancer than patients who did not use these drugs

Some studies have suggested that cholesterol-lowering statin drugs may help reduce colorectal cancer risk. A 2006 study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute did not find any protective benefit for statins.

Estrogen has been associated with a lower risk for colon cancer, perhaps because of specific enzymes that prevent cell proliferation. Drugs containing estrogen, then, may help high-risk women:

There is some evidence that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) reduces the risk of colon cancer in postmenopausal women. It carries other risks, however, including a higher risk for breast and uterine cancer and blood clots. A 2004 New England Journal of Medicine study found that while short-term use of estrogen plus progestin reduced the risk of developing colon cancer, combination HRT users who were diagnosed with the disease had more advanced forms of the cancer. Older women who are at higher risk for colon cancer might discuss risks and benefits of HRT with their doctor.
Oral contraceptives may reduce younger women's risk of colon cancer. Duration of use does not seem to be associated with decreased risk, but protection appears stronger for women who have more recently used oral contraceptives.

Diagnosis

Colon and rectal cancers are diagnosed using the screening tests discussed below. These tests can detect precancerous polyps and colorectal cancers at stages early enough for complete removal and cure.

Unfortunately, only 30 - 40% of adults over 50 years old (mostly in the upper socioeconomic group) have regular screening tests that could detect a cancer early enough for curative treatment. A survey reported that many people are not screened because they are too embarrassed. Those who had already had the tests were willing to have them again if they saved one additional day of their lives.

There is some debate about what is the best screening method. Current screening guidelines offer several different options for patients. Doctors agree that not enough people are screened and that these tests, if adopted with the same regularity as such screening tests as Pap smears, would save many lives. It is especially important for anyone at increased risk or with symptoms, such as rectal bleeding or ulcerative colitis, to have testing at an earlier age.

There is also debate about when people should stop being screened. A 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that screening provides little benefit for elderly people, especially because colorectal cancers grow very slowly. The researchers suggest that doctors should carefully consider the risks versus benefits of screening patients age 80 and older.

Individuals should discuss with their doctors the risks and benefits of all screening procedures. Some controversy exists over how often people without risk factors for cancer should be screened and which detection method should be used for them.

Guidelines for Adults Age 50 and Over with Average Risk. The following are the five screening options recommended for people age 50 and over who have no symptoms and no family history of colon cancer:

Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) every year
Flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years
FOBT or FIT every year plus sigmoidoscopy every 5 years
Double-contrast barium enema every 5 years
Colonoscopy every 10 years

Choosing between Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy. The choice between colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy for routine screening for older adults with average risk is an area of intense debate. The issues are as follows:

Sigmoidoscopy is less costly, less invasive, quicker, and safer than colonoscopy. Although it allows inspection of only the left side of the colon, any abnormal findings from sigmoidoscopy trigger a full colonoscopy. Therefore, experts estimate that sigmoidoscopy can detect 80% of all significant problems.
Colonoscopy is more sensitive than any other current screening method for detecting colon cancer. It can find 75 - 90% of colorectal cancers. If the goal were to reduce the number of cancer cases, regardless of cost, colonoscopy would be the preferred approach. Colonoscopy, however, is more expensive than sigmoidoscopy and has a slightly higher risk for complications (bowel tears or bleeding when a polyp is removed).

There are 3 basic tests for colon cancer: a stool test (to check for blood), sigmoidoscopy (inspection of the lower colon), and colonoscopy (inspection of the entire colon). All 3 are effective in catching cancers in the early stages, when treatment is most beneficial.

Screening, particularly with colonoscopy, in increased- and high-risk populations can save lives. The most important risk factors are a family history of colorectal cancer and personal history of colorectal cancer, polyps, or chronic inflammatory bowel disease. People with these risk factors should be screened before age 50 and may need more frequent screenings.

Guidelines for Increased-Risk Groups. Anyone with first-degree relatives diagnosed with colon cancer younger than 60, or with two relatives who have been diagnosed with colon cancer at any age, should consider beginning the standard screening regimen with a colonoscopy every 5 years, beginning at age 40 or 10 years before the youngest case in the family (whichever is earlier).

Men of African descent are also considered to be at increased risk for colon cancer and should discuss similar screening guidelines with their doctors.

Guidelines for High-Risk Groups. The following guidelines may be useful for specific high-risk groups.

People who have the mutated hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene (MSH2 or MLH-). Frequent colonoscopy (for instance, every 1 - 2 years) beginning in their early 20s. (Regular screening for other cancers, such as uterine cancer, is also reasonable.)
People who have the mutated familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) gene. Frequent screening with endoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) beginning in early puberty. Genetic testing is now recommended for family members of people with known FAP.
People with predisposing intestinal problems, such as widespread and active ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Annual screening with colonoscopy with biopsies of suspicious areas.

Guidelines for Follow-Up After Detection of Precancerous Polyps. Patients who have had a previous examination in which polyps were detected (and removed) should have a repeat colonoscopy 1 - 3 years later, depending on the size, number, and type of polyps removed.

The digital rectal examination is used to detect tumors in the rectum, lower intestine, and prostate gland. The doctor inserts a lubricated-gloved finger into the patient's rectum and feels for lumps or other abnormalities. The exam is quick and painless but embarrassing for some. Fewer than 10% of colon cancers develop within the region that can be evaluated by a DRE, so it is not useful as a sole screening test.

Blood in bowel movements is not always visible, in which case it is called occult (hidden) blood. Fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are used to detect this hidden blood. The most common FOBT method is called the guaiac-based test. The patient is asked to supply up to six stool specimens in a specially prepared package. A small quantity of feces is smeared on specially treated paper, which reacts to hydrogen peroxide. If blood is present, the paper turns blue.

Accuracy. FOBTs can miss more than 75% of advanced cancers. Nevertheless, large studies have indicated that this simple test, performed annually, saves lives and may reduce the risk of dying from colon cancer by 15 - 33%. The following factors may affect its accuracy:

The levels of iron in the blood can affect results. Patients should not take iron supplements or eat red meats several days before the test.
Certain raw fruits and vegetables that contain the chemical peroxidase (cauliflower, horseradish, radishes, melons, and turnips) can cause a positive test reaction even if no blood is present.
Aspirin and NSAIDs are anticoagulants that can cause minor bleeding. They should not be taken for a week before the test. However, a 2005 study suggested that the prescription anticoagulant warfarin does not affect FOBT results.
Vitamin C and foods rich in this vitamin may cause a false negative reaction and should be avoided a few days before the test.
Bleeding from other causes, such as menstruation, hemorrhoids, gingivitis, or urinary infections, can produce blood in the stools and affect results.

Even if none of these conditions is present, a test that shows hidden blood does not necessarily mean that cancer is present. About 20 - 30% of people with occult blood have noncancerous polyps or other conditions, such as gastritis, and only 5 - 10% actually have cancer. Any abnormal result, however, requires further testing, such as colonoscopy.

Lack of Compliance. Compliance is a major problem. Patients are asked to perform the tests at home and send the test cards to the laboratory. Only 35 - 50% of patients actually follow through. Occult-blood tests that give results at home are available but are extremely inaccurate. In one large study, these tests failed to detect advanced cancer in about 62% of cases, although they may detect some early cancers.

If a digital rectal exam (DRE) or fecal occult blood test (FOBT) shows signs of trouble, several methods to visualize the colon are available. They include colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema. They have the following similarities and differences:

Sigmoidoscopy can only view the rectum and the left side of the colon, while colonoscopy and barium enemas allow a view of the entire large intestine.
Both flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy involve snaking a fiber optic tube through regions of the rectum and colon to view the walls of the intestine. The tube contains a tiny camera that transmits the image to a video screen. The use of an ultrasound (sound wave) scanner is proving to enhance viewing quality. Barium enemas simply use x-rays.
During either sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, the doctor is able to remove polyps or other abnormalities revealed by these procedures with surgical instruments inserted through the tube. It is not possible to remove polyps with a barium enema, which is not invasive.

Sigmoidoscopy. Sigmoidoscopy examines the rectum and the lower two feet of the colon. It cannot, however, detect the roughly half of cancers that occur in the right colon. Right-sided cancers are more common in older people.

The procedure uses a flexible fiber optic tube (it is thus referred to as flexible sigmoidoscopy) that contains a tiny camera and surgical instruments.
It lasts about 10 minutes and may be mildly uncomfortable, but it is not painful and is generally very safe. In one study, 70% of patients reported that the procedure was far less unpleasant than they had expected.

This procedure has been found to reduce the risk of fatal cancers in the rectal and sigmoid area by 60%. If polyps are detected, a colonoscopy is then used.

Colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is the most accurate testing method and can reduce cancer incidence by up to 90%. It is clearly indicated for anyone with an increased risk for colorectal cancer, including those with a personal or family history of the disease. As with sigmoidoscopy, a colonoscopy uses a flexible tube, but it is snaked through the entire large intestine.

For about a day before the procedure the patient eats nothing and drinks a laxative solution that cleans out the colon. The taste of the solution is unpleasant, although it has improved in recent years.
The procedure typically uses a sedative that produces a "twilight" sleep and often makes the procedure more comfortable than sigmoidoscopy.
Air may be introduced into the intestine to widen it and allow the tube to navigate curves. A colonoscopy avoids the risk of radiation associated with a barium enema, but it is important to note that even a colonoscopy does not detect all cancers.

Complications are rare, but include the following:

Hyponatremia. Hyponatremia is a low concentration of sodium in the blood. The complication may be caused by the effects of bowel cleaning before the procedure that can result in water retention and reductions in sodium. When severe, it can cause temporary neurological symptoms, such as confusion, lethargy, unsteadiness, and slurred speech. Researchers suggest that sodium concentrations be measured in patients who develop such symptoms after colonoscopy.
Bowel perforation (very low risk, about 2 in 1,000 procedures). The risk for bowel perforation is greater with colonoscopy than flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Bleeding at the site of biopsy or polyp removal.

Overall, colonoscopy is a safe procedure. However, according to a 2006 study in the Annals of Internal Medicine, serious complications occur in about 5 of every 1,000 colonoscopies. Most of these complications occurred when a biopsy or polyp removal was performed. (The risk for complications without biopsy or polyp removal is about 1 in every 1,000 colonoscopies.) This study looked at colonoscopies in general, including those that are done to diagnose the causes of a patient's symptoms. The risk may be lower for colonoscopies performed solely to screen for colorectal cancer.

Barium Enema. The double-contrast barium enema, which uses an x-ray image, is the less expensive alternative for viewing the entire colon. It is not as accurate as colonoscopy, and if any polyps or abnormalities are revealed on x-ray, a colonoscopy is then required to remove suspicious tissue, so it is now recommended much less often than in the past.

The barium enema is a valuable diagnostic tool that helps detect abnormalities in the large intestine (colon). The barium enema, along with colonoscopy, remains the standard in the diagnosis of colon cancer, ulcerative colitis, and other diseases of the colon.

Screening for familial adenomatous polyposis. Genetic screening for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) is now available and may be recommended for high-risk patients. The test for FAP detects a mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli in up to 90% of people who carry it. Testing for HNPCC mutation is somewhat more complex.

Screening for insulin-like growth factor. A gene that regulates insulin-like growth factor (IGF-2) is functional during fetal development and then becomes inactive. Some evidence now suggests that people who have IGF-2 in adulthood have a higher risk for colon cancer. Blood tests for detecting IGF-2, then, may be helpful in identifying patients who should have more intensive screening. Currently, however, this is only used as a research tool.

Stool DNA Testing. A promising technique for colorectal cancer screening is the detection of altered DNA in cancer cells that have shed from the colon and are excreted in the stool. Such tests may prove to detect both inherited and noninherited genetic mutations. This may become a widely used tool in the future. However, larger clinical studies are needed.

Virtual Colonoscopy. A promising experimental technique called virtual colonoscopy allows three-dimensional imaging of the colon without using invasive instruments. As with standard colonoscopy, the patient takes a laxative first to clear out the intestine. The procedure itself involves pumping air into the colon and scanning the intestine using computed tomography (CT). It is very safe and takes about only 10 minutes. The procedure is similar in accuracy to conventional colonoscopy for detection of larger polyps (6 mm or more in diameter) and is also potentially less expensive. Colonoscopy is required, however, if suspicious areas are found, which may occur frequently with the CT procedure, since it erroneously identifies a high number of nonexistent polyps.

A study published in April 2004 in the Journal of the American Medical Association compared results of standard colonoscopy versus virtual colonoscopy in over 600 patients at nine major medical centers. Virtual colonoscopy had much lower rates of successfully finding polyps than standard colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy detected polyps of at least 6 mm in 39% of patients and polyps of at least 10 mm in 55% of patients. By contrast, standard colonoscopy detected 99% of polyps of at least 6 mm, and 100% of polyps of at least 10 mm. In addition, accuracy rates varied widely among the different hospitals. The authors advised that until more improvement in training and technique is achieved, virtual colonoscopy "is not yet ready for widespread clinical application."

Magnetic Resonance Colonography. Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) is another non-invasive technique for visualizing the colon. The patient receives an enema containing a contrast substance, and then magnetic resonance images are taken. MRC is fast, comfortable, and less invasive than colonoscopy. Currently, however, there is a poor detection rate for flat tumors and for polyp tumors less than 10 mm in diameter.

Staging

A diagnosis of cancer will lead to staging and other tests to help determine the outlook and the appropriate treatments.

The large intestine is a long hollow organ lined with mucous membrane (mucosa). Muscle layers wrap around the entire length and help move food material through to the rectum.

Unlike many other cancers, the size of the tumor is not a major factor in determining the outcome of colorectal cancer. Of greater importance is how far the cancer has spread. To determine this, doctors will assign a stage to the tumor. There are several methods for staging. The older system, known as Dukes', categorizes four basic stages: A, B, C, and D. A more recent system refers to these stages as I, II, III, and IV but divides the categories slightly differently. The term "5-year survival" means that patients have lived at least 5 years since diagnosis. Most patients who live 5 years without a recurrence are considered to be cured of their disease.


Stage	Condition	5-Year Survival
A or I	Tumor superficially involves the inner lining of the intestine.	More than 90%
B or II	Tumor has penetrated through the muscle wall of the intestine but has not reached the lymph nodes.	70 - 85%
C or III	Lymph nodes are involved.	65% or below
D or IV	Tumor has spread to other organs (metastasized), usually the liver first.	5 - 9%

Click the icon to see an image of the stages of cancer.

Researchers are continually seeking to identify tumor markers, substances (usually found in blood samples) that will assist in the diagnosis of cancer and in monitoring effects of treatment.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen. High blood levels of a protein called carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) sometimes indicate the presence of colon cancer. Unfortunately, it is also elevated in other cancers and in some noncancerous conditions. CEA is not effective as a screening tool for healthy people, but might eventually be helpful for patients with cancer.

An advanced diagnostic technique called polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can detect genetic evidence of CEA. One study indicated that when these microscopic footprints of colon cancer are detected in the lymph nodes of patients with Stage II cancer (whose lymph nodes otherwise appear to be not involved with cancer), the outlook is similar to that of patients with Stage III cancer. Patients without this so-called micrometastasis have a very favorable prognosis. Further research is needed, however, before PCR can be used in widespread practice.
In patients with a history of, or active, colon cancer, follow-up measuring of blood CEA levels may be helpful in detecting recurrence of the cancer and effectiveness of treatments.

Defective P53 Gene. The presence of a defective p53 gene is a marker for very poor prognosis in patients with advanced colon cancer. In its normal state, the gene is important for regulation of cell growth. Testing for this abnormality, however, is not widely done because it is not clear how to use this information.

Other Tumor Markers. Other tumor markers under investigation include a protein called GLUT1, cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) RNA, HER-2/neu oncoprotein, transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta-1), and CD44.

Click the icon to see an image of drawing blood for culture.

A technique known as a sentinel node biopsy is increasingly performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients. This procedure is used to determine if cancer has spread beyond the nodes, possibly reducing the need for complete axillary lymphadenectomies. It involves the following:

The procedure uses an injection of a tiny amount of a tracer, either a radioactively-labeled substance (radioisotope) or a blue dye, into the tumor site.
The tracer or dye then flows via the lymphatic system into the so-called sentinel node. This is the first lymph node to which any cancer would spread.
The sentinel lymph node and possibly one or two others are then removed.
If they do not show any signs of cancer, it is highly likely that the remainder of the lymph nodes will be cancer free, and further surgery becomes unnecessary.

It is still not known if the sentinel node biopsy has any survival advantages compared to the standard procedures with lymph nodes removal. However, one study indicated that careful and complete removal of potentially cancerous lymph nodes is still very important for improving survival in patients with Stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Whole-body imaging scans that combine positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) may be helpful in accurately staging colorectal cancer, according to preliminary research published in 2006 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Prognosis

Survival rates for colorectal cancer have been rising in recent years. The 5-year survival rate is as high as 90% for cancer that has not spread to the lymph nodes (localized cancer). When cancer has spread to lymph nodes and other parts of the body, survival rates drop to 65% and below. Because many cancers are detected at later stages, the overall survival rate is currently about 60%. African-Americans and other minorities tend to have lower survival rates than Caucasians. Studies suggest, however, these higher mortality rates are largely due to less access to optimal health care, including appropriate surgical care and aggressive treatments.

In most cases, age is not a factor in treatment success. Good survival rates are achieved in the elderly as well as in young people. Chances for survival are less in Stage II cancers if the intestine is obstructed or perforated. If cancer has spread to lymph nodes (Stage III), the outlook is better if three or fewer lymph nodes are involved. Treatment can prolong life even when cancer has spread.

Surgery

Surgical removal of the tumor ("resection") along with any affected surrounding tissue is the standard initial treatment for potentially curable colorectal cancers (cancers that have not spread beyond the colon or lymph nodes). Drug and radiation therapy are often used for advanced cancers and are continuously being tested with surgery in different combinations and sequences.

Although choosing a qualified surgeon is critical, choosing a hospital experienced in procedures is also important. The more often colon cancer surgery is performed at a given hospital, the lower the mortality rate at that hospital is likely to be.

Unless cancer is very advanced, most tumors are removed by an operation known as colectomy:

Colectomy involves removing the cancerous part of the colon and nearby lymph nodes.
The surgeon then reconnects the intestine.
If the surgeon cannot reconnect the intestine, usually because of infection or obstruction, the surgeon will perform a colostomy. The need for colostomies is higher after surgery for rectal cancer. In most cases of colon cancer, colostomies are not needed. [See "Colostomy" below.]

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing colon cancer treatment.

The Surgical Approach. The standard technique for a colectomy is open, invasive surgery. Laparoscopy, sometimes called “keyhole surgery,” is a less invasive method. Laparoscopy is still considered an investigational technique for treating colon cancer, but it is gaining more acceptance and showing good results in clinical trials.

Open Surgery:

Open surgery uses a wide incision to open the patient's abdomen. The surgeon then performs the procedures with standard surgical instruments. This is the usual method for performing colectomy.

Laparoscopy:

Laparoscopy uses a few small incisions through which the surgeon passes a fiber optic tube (laparoscope) containing a small camera or tiny instruments. It is generally used for early colon cancer (for tumors less than 2 centimeters or for well-defined tumors less than 3 centimeters).
A 2004 New England Journal of Medicine study found that patients who received laparoscopic colectomy had similar rates of surgical complications, cancer recurrence, and survival as those who received traditional open surgery. However, the patients who had laparoscopy recovered faster and did not need as many narcotic painkillers.
Several 2005 studies indicated that laparoscopy works as well as conventional surgery for treatment of colon cancer. However, laparoscopy does not appear to be as effective for rectal cancer.

Click the icon to see an image detailing pelvic laparoscopy.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a resection of the large intestine.

Other Investigational Measures. Researchers are testing expandable metal tube-like devices called stents to keep the intestine open. Stents may be used before a procedure to allow bowel cleansing or for long-term use to keep open colons that can't be operated on.

A colostomy is performed in order to bypass or remove the lower colon and rectum. The procedure generally involves creating a passage, called a stoma, through the abdominal wall that is connected to the colon. The feces pass through this passage and are eliminated. Patients must learn how to care for the stoma and keep the area sanitary.

A colostomy usually will have one opening (single-barreled), or there may be two loops opening through the skin (double-barreled).

Usually the colostomy is temporary and can be reversed by a second operation after about 3 - 6 months. It the rectum and sphincter muscles in the rectum need to be removed, the colostomy is permanent. Permanent colostomies are more common when the cancerous regions are within 2 - 3 centimeters of the anus. Fortunately, surgical advances and knowledge of the extent of safe margins are reducing the need for permanent colostomies.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a colostomy procedure.

Managing Permanent Colostomies. In cases where the colostomy is permanent, the patient must wear a colostomy pouch, which sticks to the skin using a special glue. Pouches are available as one- or two-piece systems. The one-piece system is simpler, but the two piece system allows replacement of the pouch without removing the tape.

For best results, the pouch should be emptied when about one-third full. It should be replaced 1 - 2 times a week, depending on signs of leakage (itching or burning of the skin near the stoma). The pouches are odor proof.

Surgical treatments for cancer in the rectum are complex since they involve muscles and tissue that are critical for urinary and sexual function.

Local Excision or Polypectomy for Early Stages. In order to preserve the function of the anal sphincter and prevent the need for colostomy, Stage I and Stage II tumors may be removed by local excision, sometimes followed by chemotherapy and radiation. In this procedure, the tumor is cut out without removal of a major section of rectum. In some cases cancer recurs, but a second operation may be possible. Another treatment for early-stage rectal cancer, called electrocoagulation, destroys tumors using a high frequency electric current. It is being tested in clinical trials.

Radical Resection. In about a third of cases of rectal cancer, the cancer occurs in the lower part of the rectum, where between 70 - 80% of cancers have spread beyond the rectal wall. These patients need a radical resection, in which surrounding structures, including the sphincter muscles that control bowel movements, must often be removed.

The use of chemotherapy and radiation prior to surgery may prevent the need for permanent colostomy in some patients. This is an active area of clinical research, and trials are under way to address this issue. Another technique, called coloanal anastomosis, reconstructs the area to avoid the need for colostomy, and may be appropriate in some patients.

Total Mesorectal Excision. Total mesorectal excision (TME) involves dissection and removal of the entire cancerous area of the rectum along with surrounding fatty regions where the lymph nodes are located (the mesorectum). When successful, TME preserves the sphincter muscle, reducing the need for a permanent colostomy. Increasing use of this procedure is resulting in lower recurrence rates, lower levels of impotence and incontinence, and better overall survival rates compared to other resection techniques. Some experts now recommend it as a first choice for certain patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Combining chemotherapy and radiation either before or after TME is yielding promising long-term results and a low risk for local recurrence. There are many questions, however, and it is not clear which approach is better for specific patients.

Side effects of colon surgery include:

Sexual dysfunction. This is of particular concern. In general, colostomy does not usually affect sexual function. However, wide rectal surgery can cause short- or long-term sexual dysfunction. Sildenafil (Viagra) may help men who experience this after surgery.
Irregular bowel movements.
Gas and flatulence. Pouching filters are available to reduce gas. Certain foods produce more gas than others -- usually within 6 - 8 hours after ingestion for colostomy patients. They include beans, oat bran, most fruit, and certain vegetables (cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, broccoli, and asparagus). To prevent swallowing air, patients should avoid sipping through straws, chewing gum, and chewing with their mouths open.
Diarrhea.
Bladder complications.
Sense of urinary urgency.
Fecal incontinence. Patients with rectal surgery have a higher risk for bowel dysfunction than those who had a colostomy.
Complications in or around the stoma. These can occur early after surgery to many years after the procedure. They include skin infection or breakdown, hernias, narrowing of the stoma, bleeding, and collapse.

There are no dietary restrictions, although many patients avoid foods that can produce gas. Everyone should drink plenty of fluids and get sufficient fiber.

The potential side effects of sexual and bowel dysfunction for colorectal surgical patients can be devastating, although many patients do very well and live normal productive lives. Positive emotions play a strong role in recovery. Patients who are depressed should discuss with a doctor all aspects of treatment that affect the quality of life, and consider seeking support groups.

Medications

Chemotherapy uses drugs that kill cancer cells throughout the body. There are two situations in which chemotherapy is used:

The adjuvant setting. Adjuvant refers to the use of chemotherapy after surgery in patients with Stage III tumors and selected patients with high-risk Stage II tumors (disease that is potentially curable). The goal of this therapy is to eliminate any cancer cells that surgery may have missed, thereby preventing recurrence and increasing the chance of cure. Patients of all ages, including the elderly, can benefit.
In metastatic disease. In patients with metastatic disease (where the cancer has spread to other parts of the body) the goal of chemotherapy is to shrink tumors, improve symptoms and quality of life, and lengthen life.

In the adjuvant setting, there are some differences in chemotherapy treatments between colon and rectal cancers:

Chemotherapy for Stage II is considered standard care for Stage II rectal cancer but is under debate for colon cancer.
Chemotherapy is standard for patients with Stage III colon cancer. Chemotherapy is also standard for patients with Stage III rectal cancer but is used in combination with radiation.

Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II colon cancer is controversial. Such patients tend to have a good outcome after surgery, and the positive effects of chemotherapy have been difficult to demonstrate. To date, the survival advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy in this group has been reported to be only in the range of 2%. However, better trials are still needed to confirm or refute the benefits in specific patient groups.

Although not yet known with certainty, some data suggest that certain patients with Stage II cancer may be at higher risk of recurrence and would theoretically benefit from adjuvant therapy. These include patients with cancers that have:

Obstructed the bowel
Perforated the wall of the colon
Adhered to structures outside the intestine

Advanced diagnostic techniques are under investigation for helping to select appropriate candidates for adjuvant therapy. None of these methods, however, are ready to be used routinely to help make treatment decisions. The decision whether to pursue chemotherapy for Stage II disease should be made after careful discussion between the patient and their oncologist, especially after features, such as bowel perforation or obstruction, are taken into account.

Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer. Since the early 1990s, adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU and leucovorin has been the standard of care for Stage III colon cancer. In recent years, the FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) regimen has also been used for chemotherapy following surgery. Numerous trials have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting reduces the absolute risk of death from colon cancer by about one-third and improves survival by 10%. Clinical trials are also investigating combinations of other drugs.

Chemotherapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Chemotherapy is either given directly into the arteries of the liver or intravenously (through a vein) with 5-FU and leucovorin. Oxaliplatin is sometimes added, but recent evidence suggests that the targeted therapy biologic drug bevacizumab may be a better addition. Other alternative chemotherapy choices are capecitabine, or irinotecan combined with cetuximab. Radiation therapy may be used in place of chemotherapy or in combination with it. Studies indicate that chemotherapy offers only a modest improvement in survival, but may help reduce symptoms.

Seven drugs are currently approved for colorectal cancer chemotherapy:

5-fluorouracil (5-FU, Adrucil), which is often given in combination with leucovorin (Wellcovorin). Leucovorin is a vitamin that helps boost the effectiveness of 5-FU.
Capecitabine (Xeloda)
Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin)
Irinotecan (Camptosar)
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Cetuximab (Erbitux)
Panitumumab (Vectibix)

Capecitabine is a pill form of 5-FU. The other drugs are administered intravenously. Many of these drugs are given in combination with each other. Common chemotherapy combination regimens include:

5-FU / LV (5-FU and leucovorin)
FOLFOX (5-FU with leucovorin and oxaliplatin)
FOLFORI (5-FU with leucovorin and irinotecan)
IFL (Irinotecan, 5-FU, leucovorin)
XELOX (Capecitabine and oxaliplatin)

Side effects occur with all chemotherapeutic drugs. They are more severe with higher doses and increase over the course of treatment. Because cancer cells grow and divide rapidly, anticancer drugs work by killing fast-growing cells. This means that healthy cells that multiply quickly can also be affected. The fast-growing normal cells most likely to be affected are blood cells forming in the bone marrow, and cells in the digestive tract, reproductive system, and hair follicles. Nausea and vomiting is a very common side effect, but drugs such as ondansetron (Zofran) can help provide relief. In general, side effects are nearly always temporary, and medications can help manage them. Most patients are able to continue with normal activities for all but perhaps 1 - 2 days a month.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) with Leucovorin. Adjuvant therapy using 5-fluorouracil, either alone or with leucovorin (5-FU/LV), is the standard treatment for patients with high-risk colon cancer (Stage III or select patients with Stage II tumors). Leucovorin, also called folinic acid, is a form of the B vitamin folic acid, which helps increase 5-FU’s effectiveness. Patients are given a series of cycles that usually continue for at least 6 months.

There are many different ways of giving 5-FU, including intravenously over several hours once a week, intravenously daily for 5 consecutive days every month, or as continuous infusion with a portable pump.

The side effects can be quite different, depending on the way 5-FU is given, and women may be more susceptible than men. In one analysis, 53% of women and 40% of men experienced severe side effects, while response rates and survival were similar for both sexes. Many patients, however, tolerate 5-FU with leucovorin well, with manageable side effects. The most common side effects include nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, loss of appetite, hair loss, swelling of hands and feet, rashes, and mouth sores.

Irinotecan. Irinotecan (Camptosar) blocks an enzyme essential for cell division. Irinotecan can be given alone or in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin. This combination therapy (irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV) is also referred to as the "Salz regimen," or IFL. When it was approved in the mid 1990s, irinotecan was the first new drug developed for colon cancer in over 30 years. Studies have shown that irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) significantly delays the time at which tumors progress and improves survival in metastatic cancer compared to 5-FU/LV alone. While the survival advantage is small, the combination has become the standard of care for metastatic cancer. Of concern, however, are studies that have reported an increased risk of death from toxic effects with the use of the three-drug combination. These deaths appeared to be related to blood-clotting complications. Doctors should carefully monitor dosages. Diarrhea is a common side effect of irinotecan.

Capecitabine. Capecitabine (Xeloda), an oral form of 5-FU, was approved in 2001 as a treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. It is the only pill approved for colorectal cancer. A major 2005 study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that capecitabine works as well as the standard 5-FU/LV regimen and causes significantly fewer side effects. The study involved patients with Stage III colon cancer who had undergone surgical removal of the tumor. In 2005, capecitabine was approved for postsurgical treatment of patients with Dukes’ C colon cancer. Capecitabine is also showing promise in combination with radiation therapy for rectal cancers.

Oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) is related to cisplatin, a widely used platinum-based chemotherapy drug. Oxaliplatin is used in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin. (This triple combination therapy is called the FOLFOX regimen.) Oxaliplatin was first approved in 2002 for use in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin as a second-line treatment for cancer that has progressed after initial therapy.

Since 2002, oxaliplatin has received additional approvals as a first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, and as a post-surgical treatment for patients who have undergone tumor resection.

Oxaliplatin can cause pain and tingling sensations in the hands and feet (neuropathy) that is worsened by exposure to cold. Recent research suggests that adding xaliproden (Xaprila) to the FOLFOX regimen may help reduce the frequency of neuropathy without interfering with the benefits of chemotherapy. Xaliproden is a drug used to treat the neurological disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (also known as Lou Gehrig's disease).

Bevacizumab. Bevacizumab (Avastin) was approved in February 2004 as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (advanced cancer that has spread in the body). It is used in combination with IFL (irinotecan, 5-FU, leucovorin). Bevacizumab is a genetically engineered monoclonal antibody that targets and inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein that regulates angiogenesis (the development of new blood vessels that feed a tumor's blood supply). It is the first anti-angiogenic therapy approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

In a study of 800 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, bevacizumab administered intravenously along with IFL extended survival by about 5 months longer than IFL alone. Common side effects of bevacizumab include nosebleeds, fatigue, diarrhea, and high blood pressure. Less common side effects include stroke, heart attacks, angina, and formation of holes in the colon and stomach (gastrointestinal perforation).

Cetuximab. Cetuximab (Erbitux) was approved in February 2004 for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. This monoclonal antibody drug targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a protein required by cancer cells in order to proliferate. It can be used either in combination with irinotecan or alone for patients who have not responded to irinotecan. Studies of the cetuximab-irinotecan combination suggest it can help in tumor shrinkage. It has a modest effect on survival, prolonging patients’ lives by about an additional month.

Panitumumab. Panitumumab (Vectibix) was approved in September 2006 for treatment of colorectal cancer that has metastasized following standard chemotherapy. Like cetuximab, panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody drug that targets EGFR. In clinical trials, panitumumab helped delay disease progression and prolong survival by about 3 months. About 8% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage. Common side effects of this drug include skin rash, fatigue, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea or constipation. Serious side effects include pulmonary fibrosis, severe skin rash, and skin reactions at the infusion site.

One of the most promising recent developments in cancer treatment research has been the emergence of so-called "targeted therapies." Traditional chemotherapy drugs can be effective, but because they do not distinguish between healthy and cancerous cells their generalized toxicity can cause severe side effects. Targeted therapies work on a molecular level by blocking specific mechanisms associated with cancer cell growth and division. Because they selectively target cancerous cells, they may induce less severe side effects. In addition, these drugs hold the promise of creating options for more individualized cancer treatment based on a patient's genotype. In the future, diagnostic tests may help doctors identify which patients are more likely to respond successfully to specific drugs.

Biologic therapies use the body's immune system to attack the cancer (immunotherapy). These drugs are derived from biological sources and include vaccines, monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), and gene therapies. Many targeted therapies are classified as biologics. Bevacizumab (Avastin), cetixumab (Erbitux), and panitumumab (Vectibix) are currently the three biologic drugs approved for colorectal cancer treatment, but many other drugs are in development.

Targeted therapies involve many different types of drugs and molecular pathways. These include:

Angiogenesis Inhibitors. Anti-angiogenesis drugs inhibit the formation of new blood vessels that supply tumors with the blood, oxygen, and nutrients vital to tumor growth. Angiogenesis inhibitors, such as the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (Avastin), target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Cediranib (Recentin), formerly AZD2171, is a new angiogenesis inhibitor that is in Phase III clinical trials for treatment of colorectal cancer.

Tumor Growth Factor Inhibitors. Tumor growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor, stimulate cell growth. Cetixumab (Erbitux) and panitumumab (Vectibix) are the two currently approved colorectal cancer drugs that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Nimotuzumab (TheraCIM) is currently being studied in combination with irinotecan in Phase III trials.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Tyrosine kinase is an enzyme associated with EGFR that is involved with the signaling mechanisms that prompt cell growth. The EGFR/tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib (Tarceva), which is approved for the treatment of pancreatic and lung cancers, is being investigated as an adjuvant treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Sunitinib (Sutent), which is approved for renal cell carcinoma, is another tyrosine kinase inhibitor in Phase III trials for colorectal cancer.

Radiation Treatment

Radiation therapy uses x-rays to kill cancer cells that might remain after an operation or to shrink large tumors before an operation so that they can be removed surgically. The object of radiation therapy is to damage the tumor as much as possible without harming surrounding tissues. Radiation may be administered in the following ways:

Externally by an x-ray machine (external beam radiation).
By passing radioactive pellets through thin plastic tubes inserted into the intestine.
By implanting tiny radiation seeds directly into the tumor (brachytherapy).
Computer imaging techniques providing 3-dimensional pictures of the cancerous area are allowing precise targeting of radiation to the tumor.

Postoperative radiation treatment combined with chemotherapy is common practice for patients with rectal cancer in Stages II and III. Such patients are at risk of recurrence both at the site of their original tumor and elsewhere in the body. Although there can be significant long-term side effects, the combination of 5-FU and radiation is still considered standard after surgery.

The standard procedure in the U.S. is to apply radiation after surgery (postoperative). Pre-operative chemotherapy and radiation, however, are sometimes used to preserve sphincter-muscle function and reduce the chance that a patient will need a colostomy. Furthermore, some studies suggest that the use of radiation before surgery reduces the likelihood of recurrences and may slightly prolong survival in some patients with rectal cancer. (It has no additional advantages, however, if the subsequent surgery does not completely remove the cancerous regions.) Studies comparing preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy and radiation are currently under way.

Radiation therapy can also be used during surgery (a procedure called intra-operative radiotherapy). It allows the surgeon to move healthy tissue out of the path of the radiation beam.

Short-term side effects of radiation include:

Diarrhea
Skin irritation around the anus
Incontinence
Fatigue
Bowel movement problems

Longer-term complications may include:

Incontinence
Hip and pelvic fractures
Diarrhea
Increased risk for bowel obstruction

Follow-up Testing

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) sets guidelines for follow-up testing to detect recurring cancer after the completion of treatment. The following guidelines are based on ASCO’s 2005 updated recommendations.

Most colorectal cancer recurrences happen within 3 years after surgery. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that a colorectal cancer patient sees their doctor for a physical examination every 3 - 6 months for the first 3 years, every 6 months for the fourth and fifth years, and at the doctor's and patient's discretion during subsequent years.

Patients should have a colonoscopy 3 years after surgery. If the results are normal, patients should then receive a colonoscopy every 5 years. Some patients with hereditary types of colorectal cancer may need more frequent screenings.

A flexible sigmoidoscopy is recommended every 6 months for 5 years for patients with Stage II or III rectal cancer who did not receive radiation therapy.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels should be measured every 3 months after surgery for 3 years in patients with Stage II or III cancer. High CEA levels in the blood may indicate that the cancer has spread to other parts of the body.

Patients at high risk for cancer recurrence should receive an annual computerized tomography (CT) scan for the first 3 years after treatment. The CT scan can help determine if cancer has spread to the lungs or liver. Patients who have had rectal cancer, and did not have radiation therapy, should receive a pelvic CT scan. The scan is not recommended for most lower-risk patients with Stage I or II colorectal cancer.

American Society of Clinical Oncology does not recommend other follow-up blood tests such as complete blood count, liver function tests, fecal occult blood tests. There appears to be no additional benefit for these tests.

Treatment for Metastasized Colorectal Cancer

The liver is the most frequent site for colorectal cancers to spread (metastasized). Here, treatments may slow the spread of cancer and even prolong survival. Cure is very rare.

When cancer has spread, surgery to remove or bypass obstructions in the intestine may be performed. In these circumstances, surgery is considered palliative in that it may improve symptoms but will not lead to cure. In rare cases, metastatic colon cancer may be cured with surgical removal of tumors in areas to which the cancer has spread, such as the liver, ovaries, and lung. The liver is the most common site of spread. Only selected patients may be eligible for such surgery, but in these patients, 5-year survival has been 25% or higher.

Chemotherapy may help improve symptoms and possibly prolong survival in metastasized colorectal cancers. Several investigational drugs are being tested. Doctors are also testing chemotherapy administered directly into the liver -- a treatment called hepatic arterial infusion (HAI). A 2006 study found that hepatic arterial infusion improves survival and quality of life for patients whose cancer has spread to the liver. The study indicated that HAI works better for these patients than chemotherapy delivered intravenously.

Other investigative techniques used to destroy liver tumors include:

Cryosurgery. This approach freezes the tumor or surrounding tissue.
Embolization. Embolization employs a catheter to deliver substances into the liver that block blood vessels and therefore starve the tumor. Chemotherapy is often administered during this procedure.
Radiation.

For end-stage cancer, hospice care is a compassionate option.

Resources

www.cancer.org -- American Cancer Society
www.cancer.gov -- National Cancer Institute
www.oncolink.org -- OncoLink cancer information
www.asco.org -- American Society of Clinical Oncology
www.plwc.org -- People Living with Cancer
www.nccn.org -- National Comprehensive Cancer Network
www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials -- Find clinical trials

References

Chan AT, Ogino S, Fuchs CS. Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in relation to the expression of COX-2. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2131-42.

Cole BF, Baron JA, Sandler RS, Haile RW, Ahnen DJ, Bresalier RS, et al. Folic acid for the prevention of colorectal adenomas: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2007 Jun 6;297(21):2351-9.

Flossmann E, Rothwell PM; British Doctors Aspirin Trial and the UK-TIA AspirinTrial. Effect of aspirin on long-term risk of colorectal cancer: consistent evidencefrom randomised and observational studies. Lancet. 2007 May 12;369(9573):1603-13.

Kerr DJ, Dunn JA, Langman MJ, Smith JL, Midgley RS, Stanley A, et al. Rofecoxib and cardiovascular adverse events in adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):360-9.

Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Shapiro JA, Schulman J. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Dec 19;145(12):880-6.

Meyerhardt JA, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Saltz LB, Hu FB, Mayer RJ, et al. Association of dietary patterns with cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. JAMA. 2007 Aug 15;298(7):754-64.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Routine aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the primary prevention of colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 6;146(5):361-4.

Veit-Haibach P, Kuehle CA, Beyer T, Stergar H, Kuehl H, Schmidt J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer staging with whole-body PET/CT colonography. JAMA. 2006 Dec 6;296(21):2590-600.

Review Date:
9/8/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Weight problems and children

admin — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:50:23 -0700

Overview

Alternative Names
Information

Illustrations

Childhood obesity

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Alternative Names

Children and weight problems

Information

In the U.S., at least one out of five kids is overweight. The number of overweight children continues to grow. Over the last two decades, this number has increased by more than 50% and the number of "extremely" overweight children has nearly doubled.

A doctor determines if children are overweight by measuring their height and weight. Although children have fewer weight-related health problems than adults, overweight children are at high risk of becoming overweight adolescents and adults. Overweight adults are at risk for a number of health problems including heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure stroke, and some forms of cancer.

Did You Know That...

Obese children and adolescents have shown an alarming increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes, also known as adult-onset diabetes.
Many obese children have high cholesterol and blood pressure levels, which are risk factors for heart disease.
One of the most severe problems for obese children is sleep apnea (interrupted breathing while sleeping). In some cases this can lead to problems with learning and memory.
Obese children have a high incidence of orthopedic problems, liver disease, and asthma.
Overweight adolescents have a 70 percent chance of becoming overweight or obese adults.

Children become overweight for a variety of reasons. The most common causes are genetic factors, lack of physical activity, unhealthy eating patterns, or a combination of these factors. In rare cases, a medical problem, such as an endocrine disorder, may cause a child to become overweight. Your doctor can perform a careful physical exam and some blood tests, if necessary, to rule out this type of problem.

Genetic Factors: Children whose parents or brothers or sisters are overweight may be at an increased risk of becoming overweight themselves. Although weight problems run in families, not all children with a family history of obesity will be overweight. Genetic factors play a role in increasing the likelihood that a child will be overweight, but shared family behaviors such as eating and activity habits also influence body weight.
Lifestyle: A child's total diet and his or her activity level both play an important role in determining a child's weight. The increasing popularity of television and computer and video games contributes to children's inactive lifestyles. The average American child spends approximately 24 hours each week watching television-time that could be spent in some sort of physical activity.

TALK TO YOUR DOCTOR

If you think that your child is overweight, it is important to talk with your child's doctor. A doctor is the best person to determine whether your child has a weight problem. doctors will measure your child's weight and height to determine if your child's weight is within a healthy range. A doctor will also consider your child's age and growth patterns to determine whether your child is overweight. Assessing overweight in children is difficult because children grow in unpredictable spurts. Based on your child's height and weight, they will calculate a body mass index (BMI). If your child's BMI is greater than 95% of children their age and gender, they are considered to be overweight

For example, it is normal for boys to have a growth spurt in weight and catch up in height later. It is best to let your child's doctor determine whether your child will "grow into" a normal weight. If your doctor finds that your child is overweight, he or she may ask you to make some changes in your family's eating and activity habits.

BE SUPPORTIVE

One of the most important things you can do to help overweight children is to let them know that they are okay whatever their weight. Children's feelings about themselves often are based on their parents' feelings about them. If you accept your children at any weight, they will be more likely to accept and feel good about themselves. It is also important to talk to your children about weight, allowing them to share their concerns with you. Your child probably knows better than anyone else that he or she has a weight problem. For this reason, overweight children need support, acceptance, and encouragement from their parents.

FOCUS ON THE FAMILY

Parents should try not to set children apart because of their weight, but focus on gradually changing their family's physical activity and eating habits. Family involvement helps to teach everyone healthful habits and does not single out the overweight child.

INCREASE YOUR FAMILY'S PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

Regular physical activity, combined with healthy eating habits, is the most efficient and healthful way to control your weight. It is also an important part of a healthy lifestyle. Some simple ways to increase your family's physical activity include the following:

Be a role model for your children. If your children see that you are physically active and have fun, they are more likely to be active and stay active for the rest of their lives.
Plan family activities that provide everyone with exercise and enjoyment, like walking, dancing, biking, or swimming. For example, schedule a walk with your family after dinner instead of watching TV. Make sure that you plan activities that can be done in a safe environment.
Be sensitive to your child's needs. Overweight children may feel uncomfortable about participating in certain activities. It is important to help your child find physical activities that they enjoy and that aren't embarrassing or too difficult.
Reduce the amount of time you and your family spend in sedentary activities, such as watching TV or playing video games.
Become more active throughout your day and encourage your family to do so as well. For example, walk up the stairs instead of taking the elevator, or do some activity during a work or school break-get up and stretch or walk around.

The point is not to make physical activity an unwelcome chore, but to make the most of the opportunities you and your family have to be active.

TEACH YOUR FAMILY HEALTHY EATING HABITS

Teaching healthy eating practices early will help children approach eating with the right attitude-that food should be enjoyed and is necessary for growth, development, and for energy to keep the body running. The best way to begin is to learn more about children's nutritional needs by reading or talking with a health professional and then to offer them some healthy options, allowing your children to choose what and how much they eat.

DON'T PLACE YOUR CHILD ON A RESTRICTIVE DIET

Children should never be placed on a restrictive diet to lose weight, unless a doctor supervises one for medical reasons. Limiting what children eat may be harmful to their health and interfere with their growth and development.

To promote proper growth and development and prevent overweight, parents should offer the whole family a wide variety of foods from each of the food groups.

Most of the foods in your diet should come from the grain products group (6-11 servings), the vegetable group (3-5 servings), and the fruit group (2-4 servings). (See chart for suggested serving sizes.)
Your diet should include moderate amounts of foods from the milk group (2-3 servings) and the meat and beans group (2-3 servings).
Foods that provide few nutrients and are high in fat and sugars should be used sparingly. Fat should not be restricted in the diets of children younger than 2 years of age.

EXAMPLES OF ONE SERVING

Bread, cereal, rice, pasta

1 slice of bread
1 ounce of ready to eat cereal
1/2 cup of cooked cereal, rice, or pasta

Milk, yogurt, cheese

1 cup of milk or yogurt
1 1/2 ounces of natural cheese
2 ounces of processed cheese

Vegetables

1 cup of raw vegetables or 1/2 cup of frozen leafy leafy vegetables (cooked)
1/2 cup of other vegetables - cooked or chopped raw
3/4 cup of vegetable juice

Meat, poulty, fish, beans, nuts

2-3 ounces of cooked lean meat, poultry, or fish
1/2 cup of cooked dry beans or 1 egg counts as 1 ounce of lean meat
2 tablespoons of peanut butter or 1/3 cup of nuts count as 1 ounce of meat

Fruits

1 medium apple, banana, or orange
1/2 cup of chopped, cooked, or canned fruit
3/4 cup of fruit juice

Serving sizes are for children and adults ages 2 years and older. A range of servings is given for each food group. The smaller number is for children who consume about 1,300 calories a day, such as 2-4 years of age. The larger number is for those who consume about 3,000 calories a day, such as boys 15-18 years of age.

CUT DOWN ON FAT

Reducing fat is a good way to cut calories without depriving your child of nutrients. Simple ways to cut the fat in your family's diet include eating lowfat or nonfat dairy products, poultry without skin and lean meats, and lowfat or fat-free breads and cereals.

Making small changes to the amount of fat in your family's diet is a good way to prevent excess weight gain in children: however, major efforts to change your child's diet should be supervised by a health professional.

In addition, fat should not be restricted in the diets of children younger than 2 years of age. After that age, children should gradually adopt a diet that contains no more than 30 percent of calories from fat by the time the child is about 5 years old.

DON'T OVERLY RESTRICT SWEETS OR TREATS

While it is important to be aware of the fat, salt, and sugar content of the foods you serve, all foods -- even those that are high in fat or sugar -- have a place in the diet (in moderation, of course). However, children should be taught to limit high-calorie soft drinks and foods such as candy and deserts, and salty snacks such as potato chips and french fries.

GUIDE CHOICES RATHER THAN DICTATE FOODS

Make a wide variety of healthful foods available in the house. This practice will help your children learn how to make healthy food choices.

ENCOURAGE YOUR CHILD TO EAT SLOWLY

A child can detect hunger and fullness better when eating slowly.

EAT MEALS TOGETHER AS A FAMILY

Try to make mealtimes pleasant with conversation and sharing, not a time for scolding or arguing. If mealtimes are unpleasant, children may try to eat faster to leave the table as soon as possible. They then may learn to associate eating with stress.

INVOLVE CHILDREN IN FOOD SHOPPING AND PREPARING

These activities offer parents hints about children's food preferences, teach children about nutrition, and provide children with a feeling of accomplishment. In addition, children may be more willing to eat or try foods that they help prepare.

PLAN FOR SNACKS

Continuous snacking may lead to overeating, but snacks that are planned at specific times during the day can be part of a nutritious diet, without spoiling a child's appetite at mealtimes. You should make snacks as nutritious as possible, without depriving your child of occasional chips or cookies, especially at parties or other social events. Below are some ideas for healthy snacks.

EXAMPLES OF HEALTHY SNACKS

Fresh, frozen, or canned vegetables and fruit served either plain or with lowfat or fat-free cheese or yogurt
Dried fruit, served with nuts or sunflower or pumpkin seeds
Breads and crackers made with enriched flour and whole grains, served with fruit spread or fat-free cheese
Frozen desserts, such as nonfat or lowfat ice cream, frozen yogurt, fruit sorbet, popsicles, water ice, and fruit juice bars

Warning: Children of preschool age can easily choke on foods that are hard to chew, small and round, or sticky, such as hard vegetables, whole grapes, hard chunks of cheese, rasins, nuts, and seeds, and popcorn. It's important to carefully select snacks for children in this age group.

DISCOURAGE EATING WHILE WATCHING TV

Try to eat only in designated areas of your home, such as the dining room or kitchen. Eating in front of the TV may make it difficult to pay attention to feelings of fullness, and may lead to overeating.

DON'T USE FOOD TO PUNISH OR REWARD

Withholding food as a punishment may lead children to worry that they will not get enough food. For example, sending children to bed without any dinner may cause them to worry that they will go hungry. As a result, children may try to eat whenever they get a chance. Similarly, when foods, such as sweets, are used as a reward, children may assume that these foods are better or more valuable than other foods. For example, telling children that they will get dessert if they eat all of their vegetables sends the wrong message about vegetables.

MONITOR MEALS OUTSIDE THE HOME

Find out more about your school lunch program, or pack your child's lunch to include a variety of foods. Also, select healthier items when dining at restaurants.

SET A GOOD EXAMPLE

Children are good learners, and they learn best by example. Setting a good example for your kids by eating a variety of foods and being physically active will teach your children healthy lifestyle habits that they can follow for the rest of their lives.

ADDITIONAL HELP

If you need to make changes to your family's eating and exercise habits, but are finding it difficult, a registered dietitian (RD) may be able to help. Your doctor may be able to refer you to an RD, or you can call the National Center for Nutrition and Dietetics of The American Dietetic Association at 800-366-1655 and ask for the name of an RD in your area.

If your efforts at home are unsuccessful in helping your child reach a healthy weight and your doctor determines that your child's health is at risk unless he or she loses weight steadily, you may want to consider a formal treatment program. To locate a weight-control program for your child, you may want to contact a local university-based medical center.

Look for the following characteristics when choosing a weight-control program for your child. The program should:

Be staffed with a variety of health professionals. The best programs may include RDs, exercise physiologists, pediatricians or family doctors, and psychiatrists or psychologists.
Perform a medical evaluation of the child. Before being enrolled in a program, your child's weight, growth, and health should be reviewed by a doctor. During enrollment, your child's weight, growth, and health should be monitored by a health professional at regular intervals.
Focus on the whole family, not just the overweight child.
Be adapted to the specific age and capabilities of the child. Programs for 4-year-olds are different from those developed for children 8 or 12 years of age in terms of degree of responsibility of the child and parents.
Focus on behavioral changes.
Teach the child how to select a variety of foods in appropriate portions.
Encourage daily activity and limit sedentary activity, such as watching TV.
Include a maintenance program and other support and referral resources to reinforce the new behaviors and to deal with underlying issues that contributed to overweight.

The overall goal of a successful treatment program should be to help the whole family focus on making healthy changes to their eating and activity habits that they will be able to maintain throughout life.

Created by the National Institute of Health. NIH Publication No. 97-4096 and NIH Word on Health, June 2002

Review Date: 10/23/2007

Reviewed By: Daniel Rauch, M.D., FAAP., Director, Pediatric Hospitalist Program, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. Review provided by VeriMed Healthcare Network.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Source Doc: 1_001999