PopSugar

Skins: Watch The Start Of Series 3!

PopSugarUK — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:59:32 -0800

Are you itching for more of a look at the new series of Skins? How about the first part of episode one? We have the first eight minutes of the new series - so check it out! With the old cast's Dev Patel having such enormous success with Slumdog Millionaire, do you think you'll be able to spot who might be up for a Best Actor award at the BAFTAs in a couple of years time?!

Check Out The New Skins Cast!

PopSugarUK — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:00:00 -0800

It's almost time for the third series of Skins to begin, and the majority of you are looking forward to the new episodes featuring an almost all new cast. In our Best Of 2008 polls, you voted it as your favourite British TV show of 2008, and I hope they manage to keep everything you love about the show with this new crew of kids, led by Tony's younger sister Effy (Kaya Scodelario). The series starts on January 22, and here's the traditional abstract trailer featuring the cast (NSFW) as well as some photos of the gang of kids that will take Tony, Jal, Chris, Cassie, Sid, Anwar, Maxxie and Michelle's places.

To see more photos of the new cast for series three, just read more

View 10 Photos ›

Photos courtesy and copyright of Channel 4.

09/01/2009 Skins Series 3

PopSugarUK — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:52:55 -0800

View Slideshow ›

Pop Watch: Skins, Episode 3 "Sid"

PopSugarUK — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:55:00 -0800

Understated. That's the usual image of Sid we get on Skins, and that's why I've been looking forward to a more in-depth Sid-centric episode for a while. And what an episode it was. Wow. Let me sum up my thoughts and then I want to hear yours!

I'm a big fan of Sid and Cassie as a couple, so I loved the first few seconds when I realised he was talking to Cassie online. But she was in a bedroom... with a Scottish guy... in her underwear. Noooo! Poor heartbroken Sid. Obviously it was a misunderstanding and the Scottish guy was gay, but Sid wasn't to know that. Meanwhile, Sid's Dad was stressing because his own Father was coming to town.

Whenever Sketch arrives on the screen I expect there to be a freaky Psycho-shower-scene-style "riik, riik, riik" sound effect playing. So I really can't deal with her and Anwar being a couple. She's scary!

But back to Sid's Dad, and his Mum. I love that in this show the parents are as messed up, if not more, than the kids. Do you like the amount of coverage the show gives to the main characters' parents? Or do you think they detract from the show's action?

I've placed the rest of my thoughts under the cut as there was a pretty groundbreaking development that I don't want to spoil for you if you missed the show, but if you've seen it, then read more

When Cassie and Sid were arguing via the webcam I was shouting at the screen – Listen to her! Stop talking! It was so sad. And then there was the madness of the car crashing into Sid's house, which led to Sid's Dad finally (and very satisfyingly) saying what he wanted to his horrible father.

The big shock of the episode was Sid's Dad's death. It was clear something was going on from the way he was humming happily to himself as Sid went to bed. And then, there he was in his chair the next morning, lifeless. I thought Sid's reaction was so beautifully played by Mike Bailey. He was as lost as Tony has been lately, confused and dazed. And only then were the rest of the gang brought back in to the fold, with Jal still showing sweet concern and care for an oblivious and Angie-obsessed Chris, and Tony re-learning how to smoke. Incidentally, do you think Angie will be back? Despite her leaving message?

Sid and Tony's friendship got back into gear in the club – I thought that their hug in the middle of all the madness was great. But enough about me, I want to know what you thought about Tony and Sid getting back on track, the ending – where Cassie and Sid missed each other on the trains – and absolutely everything else. So much happened! What did you think?!

(Images courtesy of Channel 4)

Condensed Sugar!

PopSugarUK — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:30:00 -0700

I headed to T4 On The Beach and brought back exclusive photos of Peter Andre, JLS and the Skins cast!
Chris Brown apologized to fans for his assault on Rihanna
The new Doctor Who - Matt Smith - was pictured in costume for the first time
The Mercury Music Prize nominations were revealed, including Florence & the Machine
We wished Daniel Radcliffe a happy 20th birthday by looking back on his career!
Katie Price and Victoria Beckham were rumoured to be in the new Sex and the City film - who would you prefer to see alongside SJP?
The series 2 finale of Gossip Girl aired and we saw the cast filming series 3
Sugababes' Heidi Range and Amelle Berrabah became the latest celeb swine flu victims
Steven Gerrard was found not guilty of affray
Twilight costars Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart were reunited at Comic-Con
Amy Winehouse was cleared of assualt in a London court

What To Sky+: Wednesday

PopSugarUK — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:00:00 -0700

BBC1 has a new series of Who Do You Think You Are? featuring Davina McCall plus A Fish Called Wanda
BBC2 has The Culture Show plus two new series: Home for Life and Dragons' Den
BBC3 has T in the Park
ITV2 has Gossip Girl
Ch4 has Big Brother, Ugly Betty and Skins
E4 has Monster-in-Law
Five has Rough Guide to ... Classic Road Trips
Sky Indie has The Portrait of a Lady
Sky Comedy has Ferris Bueller's Day Off
Sky Classics has The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie

Scleroderma

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:17 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Symptoms and Complications...
Causes
Risk Factors
Prognosis
Diagnosis
Treatment
Medications
Other Treatments
Treatment for Raynaud's Phe...
Treatment for Skin Thickeni...
Treatment for Lung Complica...
Treatment for Gastrointesti...
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Symptoms

Because significant depression can affect more than 50% of people with scleroderma, researchers say it may be beneficial for scleroderma patients to get routine screening for depression.

Causes

Researchers have discovered a gene called connective-tissue growth factor (CTGF), which they say is more common in people with systemic scleroderma than in those without the disease.

Prognosis

The prognosis for patients with systemic scleroderma has improved since the 1970s. Ten-year survival rates are up, and deaths from kidney crises have dropped. However, deaths from pulmonary fibrosis have increased during this time period.

Treatment

High-dose immunosuppressant therapy with cyclophosphamide significantly improved skin and overall function in patients with scleroderma.
Evidence shows that intravenous iloprost given in progressively increasing doses can reduce the duration and frequency of Raynaud's phenomenon attacks.
A potential new therapy using PVAC, a substance derived from the bacterium, Mycobacterium vaccae, can improve skin symptoms without causing significant side effects.

Introduction

The name scleroderma comes from the Greek words skleros, which means hard, and derma, which means skin. The disease is categorized as a rheumatologic disorder because it affects the connective tissues in the body.

Scleroderma is a rare disease marked by the following:

Damage to the cells lining the walls of small arteries
An abnormal buildup of tough scar-like tissue in the skin

Patients with scleroderma may develop either a localized or a systemic (body-wide) form of the disease.

Localized scleroderma usually affects only the skin on the hands and face. Its course is very slow, and it rarely, if ever, goes throughout the body (becomes systemic) or causes serious complications. There are two main forms of localized scleroderma: morphea and linear scleroderma.

Morphea Scleroderma. In morphea scleroderma, patches of hard skin form and can last for years. Eventually, however, they may improve or even disappear. There is less than a 1% chance that this disorder will progress to systemic scleroderma.

Linear Scleroderma. Linear scleroderma causes bands of hard skin across the face or on a single arm or leg. Linear scleroderma may also involve muscle or bone. Rarely, if this type of scleroderma affects children or young adults, it may interfere with growth and cause severe deformities in the arms and legs.

Systemic scleroderma is also called systemic sclerosis. This form of the disease may affect the organs of the body, large areas of the skin, or both. This form of scleroderma has two main types: limited and diffuse scleroderma. Both forms are progressive, although most often the course of the disease in both types is slow.

Limited Scleroderma (also called CREST Syndrome). Limited scleroderma is a progressive disorder. It is classified as a systemic disease because its effects can be widespread throughout the body. It generally differs from diffuse scleroderma in the following ways:

Most often the internal organs are not affected.
Patients with scleroderma have a less serious course, unless they develop pulmonary hypertension (a particular danger with the CREST syndrome). Pulmonary hypertension is high blood pressure in the lungs (see the Lung Complications section).

Limited scleroderma is commonly referred to by the acronym CREST, whose letters are the first initials of characteristics that are usually found in this syndrome:

Calcinosis. With this condition, mineral crystal deposits form under the skin, usually around the joints. Skin ulcers filled with a thick white substance may form over the deposits.
Raynaud's phenomenon. In this syndrome, the fingers of both hands are very sensitive to cold, and they remain cold and blue-colored after exposure to low temperatures. This occurs in nearly all cases of scleroderma, both limited and diffuse. It is caused by abnormal changes in small blood vessels. These changes cause the vessels to narrow, and blood flow is temporarily interrupted, usually in the fingers.
Esophageal motility dysfunction. The esophagus carries food from the mouth to the stomach. In esophageal motility dysfunction, the muscles in the esophagus become scarred by scleroderma and do not contract normally. This can cause severe heartburn and other symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD).
Sclerodactylia (also called acrosclerosis). This is the stiffness and tightening of the skin of the fingers, a classic symptom of scleroderma. Bone loss may occur in the fingers and toes.
Telangiectasia. In this situation, widening of small blood vessels causes numerous flat red marks to form on the hands, face, and tongue.

Click the icon to see an image of symptoms that are known as CREST.

In general, people with limited scleroderma develop Raynaud's phenomenon long before they develop any of the other symptoms. One or more of the CREST conditions can also occur in other forms of scleroderma.

Diffuse Scleroderma. Diffuse scleroderma, the other systemic sclerosis, has the following characteristics:

It can affect wide areas of the skin, connective tissue, and other organs.
It can have a very slow course, but it also may start quickly and be accompanied by swelling of the whole hand. If it gets worse quickly early on, the condition can affect internal organs and become very severe -- even life threatening.
Diffuse scleroderma can overlap with other autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus and polymyositis. In such cases, the disorder is referred to as mixed connective disease.

Click the icon to see an image of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Symptoms and Complications

Raynaud's phenomenon is often the first sign of the scleroderma disease process. With this condition, small blood vessels narrow in the fingers, toes, ears, and even the nose.

Attacks of Raynaud's phenomenon can occur several times a day, and are often brought on or worsened by cold. Warmth relieves these attacks. In severe cases, attacks can develop regardless of the temperature. Severe cases may also cause open sores or damage to the skin and bones, if the circulation is cut off for too long. Stress also can trigger the syndrome.

Typically, the fingers go through three color changes:

First, they become very pale.
As the blood flow is cut off, they turn a bluish color, usually in the top two sections of the second and third fingers.
Finally, when blood flow returns, the fingers become red.

Tingling and pain can occur in the affected regions.

Click the icon to see an image of Raynaud's phenomenon.

Raynaud's is very common and occurs in 3 - 5% of the general population. It's important to note that more than 80% of patients with Raynaud's phenomenon do not have scleroderma, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, or other more serious illnesses. Raynaud's is more likely to be a symptom of scleroderma or some other connective tissue disease if it develops after age 30, if it is severe, and if it is accompanied by other symptoms (such as skin changes and arthritis).

Course of Typical Skin Changes. The primary symptoms of scleroderma occur in the skin. They often take the following course:

Typically, pitted scars appear first on the hands. The skin begins to thicken and harden on the hands, feet, and face. The fingers may swell. This condition is called sclerodactylia or acrosclerosis. Patients with diffuse scleroderma may have swelling of the whole hand before the skin significantly thickens.
Thickened or hardened patches may also develop on other areas of the body. (Their appearance on the trunk and near the elbows or knees tends to be a sign of a more severe condition.)
For the first 2 or 3 years, the skin continues to thicken and feel puffy.
This process then stops, and can even get better. The skin may soften.
As the disease progresses further, however, the skin loses its ability to stretch, and becomes shiny as it tightens across the underlying bone, particularly in the fingers, toes, and around the mouth.
Eventually, in severe cases, the fingers may lose the ability to move, and can be difficult to bend. The hands and feet may curl from the tightness of the skin. It may be difficult to open the mouth widely.

Click the icon to see an image of sclerodactylia.

Other Skin Changes. The following skin symptoms may also occur:

Flat red marks, known as telangiectasis, may appear in various locations, usually the face, palms, lips, or the inside of the mouth.

Click the icon to see an image of telangiectasia.

In calcinosis, small white lumps form beneath the skin, sometimes oozing a white substance that looks like toothpaste. Calcinosis can lead to infections.
Small blood vessels at the base of the fingernails may be lost in some places, and may widen in other places. This is an indication that internal organs might be involved.
The entire surface of the skin may get darker over time, and contain patches of abnormally pale skin.
Hair loss may occur.
About 1% of patients have Sjogren syndrome, a group of symptoms that include dry eyes and dry mucus membranes (such as those in the mouth).
Inside the mouth, scleroderma can also cause changes that impair gum healing.

Changes in bones, joints, and muscles can cause the following symptoms:

Mild arthritis. The condition is usually distributed equally on both sides of the body.
Bone loss in the fingers. The destruction is not as severe as it is in rheumatoid arthritis, although the fingers may shorten over time.
Trouble bending the fingers, if the disease has affected the tendons and joints.
Muscle weakness may occur, especially near the shoulder and hip.

Complications in the Upper Digestive Tract.

Esophageal motility disorder develops when scarring in the muscles of the esophagus causes them to lose the ability to contract normally, resulting in trouble swallowing, heartburn, and gastroesophageal reflux (also known as GERD). Some experts believe that patients with severe GERD may breathe in microscopic amounts of stomach acid, which in turn may be a major cause of lung scarring.
About 80% of patients also experience impaired stomach activity. A delay in stomach emptying is very common.
Some patients develop "watermelon stomach" (medically referred to as CAVE syndrome), in which the stomach develops red-streaked areas from widened blood vessels. This causes a slow bleeding that can lead to anemia (low red blood cell counts) over time.
There may be a higher risk for stomach cancer.
Problems with movement of the food through the intestines (motility) also develop. Patients may experience an increase in bacteria and have trouble absorbing nutrients from foods through the intestines.

Complications in the Lower Digestive Tract. Complications in the lower tract are uncommon. If they do occur, they can include the following:

Scarring can cause blockages and constipation. In rare cases, constipation can become so severe that the bowel develops holes or tears, which can be life threatening.
Scarring can also damage the absorption of fats in the intestines. This can lead to an increase in the number of bacteria, which causes watery diarrhea.
Fecal incontinence (the inability to control bowel movements) may be more common than studies indicate, because patients are reluctant to report it.

Many patients, however, have few or even no lower gastrointestinal symptoms.

In severe cases, the lungs may be affected, causing shortness of breath or difficulty in taking deep breaths. Shortness of breath may be a symptom of pulmonary hypertension, an uncommon but life-threatening complication of systemic scleroderma.

Click the icon to see an image of the respiratory system.

Lung problems are usually the most serious complications of systemic scleroderma. They are now the leading cause of death in scleroderma patients. Two major lung conditions associated with scleroderma, pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension, can occur either together or independently.

Interstitial Pulmonary Fibrosis. Scleroderma involving the lung causes scarring (pulmonary fibrosis). Pulmonary fibrosis occurs in about 70% of scleroderma patients, although the progression is very slow and patients have a wide range of symptoms:

Some patients may not experience any symptoms.
When pulmonary fibrosis progresses, patients develop a dry cough, shortness of breath, and reduced ability to exercise.
Severe pulmonary fibrosis occurs in about 16% of patients with diffuse scleroderma. About half of these patients experience the most profound changes within the first 3 years. In such cases, lung function worsens rapidly over that period, and then the progression slows down.

This condition also places the patient at higher risk for lung cancer. One study suggested that interstitial lung disease may be due to severe dysfunction in the esophagus, which causes patients to breathe in tiny amounts of stomach acid.

The most important indication of future worsening in the lungs appears to be inflammation in the small airways (alveolitis). Doctors detect alveolitis by using a lung test called bronchoalveolar lavage.

Pulmonary hypertension is the narrowing of the pulmonary arteries in the lung. The narrowing of the arteries creates resistance and increases the workload of the heart. The heart becomes enlarged from pumping blood against the resistance. Some symptoms include chest pain, weakness, shortness of breath, and fatigue. The goal of treatment is to control the symptoms, although the disease usually develops into congestive heart failure.

Pulmonary Hypertension. The primary symptom of pulmonary hypertension is shortness of breath, which becomes severe over time.

Pulmonary hypertension can develop in one of two ways:

As a complication of pulmonary fibrosis
As a direct outcome of the scleroderma process itself. In this case, it is most likely to develop in patients with limited scleroderma after many years.

Click the icon to see an image of cor pulmonale.

Signs of kidney problems, such as increased levels of protein in the urine and mild high blood pressure (hypertension), are common in scleroderma. As with pulmonary hypertension, the degree of severity depends on whether the kidney problems are acute or chronic.

Slow Progression. The typical course of kidney involvement in scleroderma is a slow progression that may produce some damage but does not often lead to kidney failure.

Renal Crisis. The most serious kidney complication in scleroderma is renal crisis. It is a rare event that occurs in a small number of patients with diffuse scleroderma, most often early in the course of the disease. This syndrome includes a life-threatening condition called malignant hypertension, a sudden increase in blood pressure that can cause rapid kidney failure. This condition may be fatal. However, if the condition is successfully treated, it rarely recurs.

Until recently, renal crisis was the most common cause of death in scleroderma. Aggressive treatment with drugs that lower blood pressure, particularly those known as ACE inhibitors, is proving to be successful in reducing this risk.

Many patients with even limited scleroderma have some sort of functional heart problem, although severe complications are uncommon and occur in only about 15% of patients with diffuse scleroderma. As with other serious organ complications, they are more likely to occur within 3 years after the disease begins.

Fibrosis of the Heart. The most direct effect of scleroderma on the heart is fibrosis (scarring). It may be very mild or it can cause pain, low blood pressure, or other complications. By damaging muscle tissue, the scarring increases the risk for heart rhythm problems, problems in electrical conduction, and heart failure. The membrane around the heart can become inflamed, causing a condition called pericarditis.

Click the icon to see an image of pericarditis.

Pulmonary hypertension and hypertension associated with kidney problems in scleroderma can also affect the heart.

Other complications of scleroderma may include the following:

Patients with CREST may be at increased risk for biliary cirrhosis, an inflammatory autoimmune disorder of the liver.
Nerve damage may occur in the extremities (legs and feet, arms and fingers), causing numbness and pain. This damage can progressively worsen and lead to severe open sores (ulcerations), particularly in the hands. The feet are less often affected, but when they are, the disease tends to affect the joints and cause pain.
Bone loss (osteoporosis) can occur because of impaired blood flow.
About half of patients develop underactive thyroid gland (hypothyroidism).

Click the icon to see an image of hypothyroidism.

Impotence, usually due to scarring of the penis, may be one of the first complications of the disease in men.
Some studies using imaging techniques have found changes in brain tissue, but because the brain has little connective tissue, scleroderma appears to have little effect on mental functioning, except possibly in the late stages of severe disease.
Systemic scleroderma does not generally affect fertility in women. Pregnant women with scleroderma, however, have a slightly increased risk of premature birth and low-birth-weight babies. Although they can carry a baby to term, because complications such as kidney crisis can occur with the disease, pregnant women with scleroderma need to be monitored closely in a high-risk obstetric facility.
More than half of scleroderma patients are likely to experience significant depression. Researchers say it may be beneficial for scleroderma patients to be routinely screened for depression.

Causes

Most likely this disease is caused by a number of inherited (genetic) abnormalities, which are triggered by environmental factors.

Researchers have found a gene, called connective-tissue growth factor (CTGF), which they say regulates the production of a protein that may be a key to systemic scleroderma. This gene is more common in scleroderma patients than in people without the condition. However, researchers say the gene is just one factor that affects the development of the disease.

Research published in 2005 also showed that the growth of new blood vessels is abnormal in people with scleroderma, particularly those whose disease affects the blood vessels in the lungs. Researchers now know that cells in the blood vessels and skin of scleroderma patients make too much of certain chemicals, and not enough of others. Studies revealed that the cause is an alteration in the hereditary material, DNA. These changes "turn off" some genes and "turn up" others. It is hoped that certain drugs, some of which are already used in cancer treatments, can some day be used to stop these DNA changes.

The disease process leading to scleroderma appears to occur as an autoimmune response, in which an abnormal immune system attacks the body itself. In scleroderma, this response produces swelling (inflammation) and too much production of collagen. Collagen is the tough protein that helps build connective tissues such as tendons, bones, and ligaments. Collagen also helps scar tissue form. When normal tissue from skin, lungs, the esophagus, blood vessels, and other organs is replaced by this type of abnormal tissue, none of these body parts work as well, and many of the symptoms previously described occur.

Antigens are large molecules (usually proteins) on the surface of many cells -- both human cells, and cells of viruses, fungi, bacteria, and some non-living substances such as toxins, chemicals, drugs, and foreign particles. When the immune system recognizes an antigen as being foreign (not part of the human body), it starts offensive and defensive actions against them by producing antibodies and other chemicals such as cytokines that destroy any cells in the area.

Much of this activity is directed by T cells, which are categorized as killer T cells or helper T cells (TH cells).

The actions of the helper T cells are of special interest in scleroderma. For some unknown reason, the T cells become overactive in scleroderma and mistake the body's own collagen as a foreign antigen. This triggers a series of immune responses to destroy the collagen. When the body creates antibodies against itself in this way, it is called an autoimmune response.

Cytokines and the Inflammatory Response. Helper T cells also release powerful immune factors called cytokines. In small amounts, cytokines are necessary for healing. If overproduced, however, they can cause serious damage, including inflammation and injury.

Neutrophils. Cytokines attract to the scene large numbers of other white blood cells known as neutrophils. Neutrophils help activate chemicals known as leukotrienes. Scleroderma patients have high levels of specific leukotrienes that may contribute specifically to lung disease in scleroderma.

A process called microchimerism has been proposed as a cause of scleroderma. The theory arose from the fact that scleroderma occurs mostly in women, and its symptoms resemble those of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). GVHD occurs in bone marrow transplant patients who have received cells from another person. It happens when the transplanted donor immune cells launch an attack against the patient's cells.

Chimerism occurs when cells from two different individuals exist in the same body. When there is a low number of cells of one body in another, the condition is referred to as microchimerism.

However, if microchimerism plays a role, it most likely does so only in a subset of patients.

It is still not clear why the immune system responds abnormally in people with scleroderma. Some experts believe that environmental factors, such as a virus or a chemical, may trigger the response in individuals with a genetic vulnerability.

Oxygen-Free Radicals and Abnormal Metal Accumulation. One focus for researchers investigating scleroderma involves an observation that, as blood vessels narrow and become inflamed, destructive particles known as oxygen-free radicals are produced. Oxygen-free radicals are made by natural processes in the body. They cause harm by setting off a chemical chain reaction, which can damage any type of cell in the body. Environmental toxins, infections, and other factors may cause very high amounts of these oxygen-free radicals to build up in the body.

Chemicals. Occupational exposure to certain chemicals can cause blood vessel constriction and attacks of Raynaud's phenomenon. Despite the fact that women are at higher overall risk for scleroderma, among people who are exposed to solvents at work, men face a higher risk for the disease. However, no specific work-related factors have been proven to cause the disorder.

It is nearly impossible to determine whether specific chemicals may actually cause systemic scleroderma, primarily because few people develop the disease, even though many people are exposed to such chemicals. In addition, research has been unable to consistently repeat studies that have reported links with chemicals.

Studies have found, however, that certain industrial toxins are significantly associated with severe lung problems in people with scleroderma. The toxins most likely to be associated with severe disease include epoxy resins, white spirit, solvents, and silica mixed with welding fumes.

Repetitive Stress Injuries. Raynaud's phenomenon and symptoms of scleroderma have been associated with jobs that require intense repetitive hand and arm movements, such as working jackhammers or other vibrating tools. However, many workers are involved in such occupations, yet scleroderma is still very rare, even in this group. If there is a link, the disease would most likely develop in individuals with genetic factors that make them susceptible to the disease in the first place.

Radiation. Radiation therapy has been reported to cause local patches of scleroderma (morphea) or worsen preexisting scleroderma in a few patients. In some cases, scleroderma may occur years after radiation treatments.

Researchers think that infections may play a role in triggering the process leading to some cases of scleroderma. There is no real evidence of any single type of bacteria or other organism that might be responsible, although some are of particular interest.

Some studies reported an association between Borrelia burgdorferi, the cause of Lyme disease, and some cases of morphea (localized scleroderma). However, the evidence is weak. If there is a connection, it is possibly limited to a specific type of the bacteria in Europe and Asia. There is no connection between systemic scleroderma and Lyme disease.

Other infections associated with scleroderma include parvovirus and hepatitis C. However, there is no evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship.

Risk Factors

Scleroderma is uncommon. It afflicts about 300,000 Americans, but only about 49,000 have the systemic form of the disease. The cause of scleroderma has not been determined, and there are few specific risk factors. The incidence tends to be higher in certain groups, however.

Age. Systemic scleroderma usually develops between the ages of 35 and 55. Localized scleroderma is more common in children than adults, but is extremely rare even in the young age group. It occurs in between 0.2 and 0.4 per 100,000 people. Systemic scleroderma in children is even more rare.

Gender. The incidence of scleroderma is three to eight times higher in women than in men. This may reflect a different cause of the disease in these two genders. (It should be noted that pregnancy itself is not a risk factor for scleroderma.)

Family History. A family history is the strongest risk factor for scleroderma, but even among family members, the risk is very low (less than 1%).

Genetics. Genetic factors appear to play a role in triggering the disease, but most cases are unlikely to be inherited. Preliminary research suggests that patients with certain gene variations may be more susceptible to scleroderma than those who do not carry these variations.

Ethnicity. Limited data on risk by ethnic group in the United States suggests that the risk from highest to lowest is the following: Choctaw Native Americans (highest), African-Americans, Hispanics, Caucasians, Japanese Americans.

African-Americans have a higher rate of diffuse scleroderma, lung involvement, and a worse prognosis than Caucasians. Other studies also found lower survival rates among Japanese Americans.

Genetic factors affect population groups differently. Studies are finding that ethnic groups differ in the number of specific scleroderma-related antibodies they produce. Caucasians, for instance, have a higher rate of anti-centromere antibodies, which are associated with limited disease, while African-American patients have higher rates of autoantibodies and genetic factors that are associated with a more severe condition.

Geography. There appears to be certain geographic clusters of scleroderma, or specific types of scleroderma related to location. This may suggest an infectious or genetic factor at work, but the reasons are largely unknown. The following are some examples:

Studies reported significantly higher-than-average scleroderma mortality rates in male patients (both African-American and Caucasian) who live in two specific regions of the Southeast: one cluster around Coffee, Tennessee, and two others near Northampton, North Carolina.
A cluster of scleroderma cases has been observed in South Boston, Massachusetts.

Prognosis

At this time there is no cure for scleroderma and no treatment to change its course, but outlook varies widely. Many patients, even those with systemic scleroderma, can expect a normal lifespan.

General Outlook of Localized Scleroderma. Localized scleroderma nearly always carries a good prognosis and a normal life span. Even localized scleroderma, however, can cause some severe effects in children, including impaired growth, limb imbalance, and problems in flexing and bending muscles.

General Outlook of Systemic Scleroderma. The outlook for patients with systemic scleroderma has generally improved over the years. Ten-year survival rates rose from 54% in 1972 to 66% in 2001.

The causes of death related to systemic scleroderma also have changed. The proportion of deaths from kidney crises dropped significantly, from 42% to just 6% in that time period; however, the proportion of deaths from pulmonary fibrosis increased from 6% to 33%. Today, lung complications account for 60% of scleroderma-related deaths.

Limited Scleroderma. Patients with limited CREST scleroderma can usually expect a favorable outlook and normal lifespan if the disease affects only the hands and face. The course of this type of scleroderma still tends to be slowly progressive and, in some cases, may affect internal organs.
Diffuse Scleroderma. The severity of diffuse scleroderma varies widely, and it is very difficult to predict its course. It generally follows one of two paths: If it is acute or rapidly progressing, it may be a life-threatening condition that affects internal organs. The most critical period for rapid progression is usually within the first 2 - 5 years of the start of the disease. In the absence of rapid progression, or if the patient survives the initial acute progression, the disease tends to progress very slowly. The more severe the condition of the skin is at the start of the disease, the poorer the survival rates.

Many patients with systemic scleroderma experience a plateau in which the condition stabilizes. This plateau is followed by a period of improvement and skin softening. No one knows why this occurs, and it can happen regardless of treatment. In one study, patients with systemic scleroderma who experienced such improvements also had better survival rates (80% at 10 years) than those whose skin did not improve (60% 10-year survival rate).

The many complications of scleroderma can have a major impact on a person's sense of well-being. Patients are greatly concerned about changes in their appearance, particularly those changes caused by tightening of the facial skin. A 2002 study on scleroderma patients reported that 63% experienced at least mild pain, and half of them had some degree of depression. Depression had the greatest impact, even more than pain, in reducing patients' ability to function socially.

Diagnosis

There are no specific tests for scleroderma. The doctor may suspect scleroderma after taking a history of the symptoms and performing a physical examination. As part of this examination, the doctor does the following:

Checks the skin for thickened and hardened areas. The major signs of scleroderma are hardening and thickening of the skin in any areas on the fingers and toes.
Presses affected tendons and joints to detect crackling or grating sensations, which can indicate changes related to scleroderma beneath the skin.
Examines the fingernails underneath a microscope. The doctor may find changes in capillaries that are characteristic of scleroderma and mixed connective tissue disease.

Scientists recently found that antibodies that are often found in patients with scleroderma and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) bind to different parts of a single protein. Scientists hope this finding will one day lead to a specific diagnostic test for scleroderma.

Tests may be done to detect immune factors called antinuclear antibodies (ANAs). Detecting specific types of ANAs may help diagnose scleroderma. ANA subtypes include the following:

Rheumatoid factor, anti-single-stranded DNA, and antihistone antibodies are autoantibodies associated with scleroderma, but they are also common in other autoimmune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Some ANAs attack RNA or DNA, the genetic material in cells.
Anti-RNA polymerase III, anti-topoisomerase I (also called anti-DNA topo 1) and anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) are three other autoantibodies. Most patients with systemic scleroderma (but not localized scleroderma) have one or more of these autoantibodies. They do not appear at the same time, and seem to relate to different phases of the disease process. For example, anti-DNA topo 1 often occurs with diffuse skin scleroderma and lung complications. Anti-centromere antibodies usually occur with a less severe form of the disease.
Higher-than-normal levels of autoantibodies to fibrillin 1, a protein found in muscle and other connective tissues, is more common in patients with both systemic and localized scleroderma. This autoantibody in localized scleroderma is more common in some ethnic groups (such as Japanese and Native Americans) than in others (Caucasians). It is not found in other autoimmune diseases.

These antibodies are also found in other rheumatologic disorders, so detecting them does not necessarily prove that a patient has scleroderma. At the same time, studies have found that specific antibodies are associated with specific aspects of the disease. Therefore, identifying their presence could help diagnose, treat, and monitor people with scleroderma. Here are a few examples:

Anti-U1-RNP and anti U3-RNP are associated with muscle inflammation.
ACA is commonly associated with pulmonary hypertension and vascular disease.
TOPO is associated with pulmonary fibrosis.
RNA Polymerase III (Pol 3) is rarely linked to severe interstitial fibrosis, although this autoantibody is strongly present in patients with kidney crisis.
Patients with diffuse scleroderma who have Pol 3 have the best survival rate.

Diagnosing Lung Complications. Changes in the lungs may occur early in scleroderma lung disease, and prompt treatment is very important to prevent complications. For this reason, once a diagnosis is made, the doctor will check for lung changes in the following ways:

Listen to the lungs through a stethoscope. Rales, a crackling sound at the base of the lungs as the patient breathes in, is a sign of pulmonary fibrosis, even if breath function is normal.
Perform respiratory function tests to determine lung capacity.
Take a chest x-ray (however, x-rays do not always find lung disease, especially in children).
Have patients inhale nitric oxide to test the ability of blood vessels to open.
Perform more extensive tests, such as high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans and bronchoalveolar lavage, if the doctor suspects severe lung scarring.

Newer tests showing promise in diagnosing lung complications include:

The induced sputum test, which looks at cells taken from coughed-up phlegm
Another test that uses the inhaled chemical, technetium-labeled diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (99mTC-DTPA), to detect lung damage

Diagnosing Heart Complications. Patients with suspected heart complications should have the following tests:

Electrocardiography (ECG): A test of the heart's electrical activity
Echocardiography: A look at the beating heart through the use of sound waves
Radionucleotide ventriculography: An evaluation of the working heart using a radioactive dye

Advanced imaging techniques, which provide a more detailed picture of the heart, may also be useful to determine the extent of heart complications in scleroderma patients.

Diagnosing Pulmonary Hypertension. Echocardiography is a noninvasive imaging technique for detecting pulmonary hypertension, a common and life-threatening complication of scleroderma. (Neither materials nor equipment are put into the body.) To confirm the diagnosis, doctors sometimes use an invasive procedure called right-heart catheterization. Right-heart catheterization involves the passage of a catheter (a thin flexible tube) into the right side of the heart to get diagnostic information about the heart.

Diagnosing Gastrointestinal (Digestive) Complications. Endoscopy may detect gastrointestinal problems. Endoscopy is an invasive procedure in which a tube is inserted down the esophagus. The tube contains a small camera and other instruments. Another diagnostic test is manometry, which measures the pressure that the muscles in the esophagus apply.

Electrogastrography (EGG) measures the electrical activity in muscles in the stomach, and may be an effective method for detecting stomach problems.

Diagnosing problems in growth of blood vessels. Capillaroscopy is the microscopic examination of blood vessels under the skin. It is now considered a useful tool for identifying problems with the growth of blood vessels, because more than 95% of patients will have some capillary abnormalities. Such problems can show the severity and progression of scleroderma. In a technique called nailfold capillaroscopy, the doctor places a drop of oil on the nailfolds (the skin at the base of the fingernails), and then looks at the nailfold under a microscope for signs of changes in the capillaries that may indicate a connective tissue disease such as scleroderma.

Click the icon to see an image about endoscopy.

Other Autoimmune and Connective Tissue Disorders. Several other autoimmune conditions that affect connective tissue can strongly resemble, or occur together with, scleroderma. They include the following:

Rheumatoid arthritis
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Polymyositis

Symptoms of such diseases may also include fever, arthritis, muscle aches, rash, and lung and heart problems.

Eosinophilic Fasciitis. Eosinophilic fasciitis is a muscle disorder that is known to occur after intense hard work. It can cause symptoms similar to scleroderma, including pain, swelling, and tenderness in the hands and feet, as well as skin thickening. The disorder can be ruled out with blood tests.

Although Raynaud's phenomenon occurs in most scleroderma patients, over 80% of the cases of Raynaud's phenomenon are harmless. In one study, only 12% of Raynaud's cases were associated with some other condition, and few of those were scleroderma. The following are other problems that might accompany or cause Raynaud's phenomenon:

Other autoimmune connective tissue diseases
Diabetes (patients with diabetes may develop Raynaud's phenomenon and other scleroderma-like symptoms)
Certain drugs, including bleomycin, ergot derivatives (used for migraines), and methysergide
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (a very rare condition that is very similar to CREST syndrome)

Click the icon to see an image of a keloid.

Repetitive stress injuries (particularly from vibrating tools)
Hypothyroidism

Treatment

Scleroderma treatments vary depending on these variables:

Is it local or systemic, and if systemic, is it limited or diffuse?
If the disease is systemic, what organs, if any, are involved?

Although there is still no treatment for the underlying process of scleroderma, specific drugs and treatments help combat the various mechanisms and consequences of the disease.

Some medications keep blood vessels open (prostacylins, endothelin receptor antagonists, ACE inhibitors, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, and others) and are used to treat Raynaud's phenomenon, heart and kidney problems, and pulmonary hypertension.
Other drugs reduce inflammation and block damaging immune factors. These treatments, which include cyclophosphamide, penicillamine, bone marrow transplantation, and others may be helpful for improving skin thickness and reducing scarring, even in the lungs.
Doctors use other treatments for specific complications, such as proton pump inhibitors and pro-kinetic agents for gastrointestinal problems, or light treatments for skin thickening.
Various investigative approaches exist, including stem-cell transplants.

Patients should receive treatments for specific complications as early as possible in the course of the disease, to reduce progression before irreversible hardening of tissues occurs.

There is no cure for scleroderma. Many drugs that are useful for other autoimmune inflammatory disorders have not proven to be very effective for scleroderma. Experimental work is ongoing to develop procedures or to find drugs that can treat the underlying processes that cause damage. Developing effective treatments for scleroderma is very problematic, however, for the following reasons:

The course of scleroderma is hard to predict, making it one of the most difficult rheumatic diseases to treat. It also makes drug development complicated.
The disease, when advanced, affects many organs. Designing treatment strategies that will improve symptoms in some organs without affecting other organs is very difficult.
The disease is so uncommon that there are few patients available for clinical trials. Studies, then, are very small, sometimes having only four or five patients. It is very difficult to design studies of this size that can provide strong evidence on treatment effects. Drugs that seem promising on small groups of patients often fail to show effectiveness on larger groups.

The disease can evolve slowly over time with few symptoms, or progress rapidly and become very severe. The patient, then, must live with considerable uncertainty and emotional stress. Support associations, non-medical aids to help relieve symptoms, and other lifestyle measures can be extremely important and helpful.

Medications

Calcium-channel blockers are the standard drugs to open the blood vessels, and may be used for pulmonary artery hypertension and Raynaud's phenomenon. Short- or sustained-release nifedipine (Adalat, Procardia) is the gold standard. Other drugs used include diltiazem (Cardizem, Dilacor), and the newer dihydropyridines (felodipine, amlodipine, and isradipine). Side effects vary among different medications, and may include fluid buildup in the feet, constipation, fatigue, gingivitis, impotence, flushing, and allergic symptoms. Calcium channel blockers should not be taken with grapefruit juice, as it appears to boost the effects of these drugs. [The medications listed below are also discussed under many of the sections covering treatment complications.]

Nitrates

Nitrates relax smooth muscles and open arteries, and are therefore sometimes used for the short-term management of Raynaud's phenomenon. They are available in topical and oral (by mouth) forms. Side effects of nitrates include headaches, dizziness, nausea, blurred vision, fast heartbeat, and sweating. Lying down with the legs elevated can relieve low blood pressure and dizziness. Alcohol, beta blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and certain antidepressants can significantly worsen these side effects. Withdrawal from nitrates should be gradual. Some severe reactions have occurred when people have stopped taking these drugs too quickly.

Prostacyclins (also called Prostaglandins)

Prostacyclins open blood vessels and also have anti-blood-clotting properties. One or all of these drugs is used to treat pulmonary artery hypertension and Raynaud's phenomenon. Several prostacyclins are being used for scleroderma, although none have been approved specifically for the condition. Promising prostacyclins or similar drugs include iloprost (Ventavis), alprostadil (prostaglandin E1), epoprostenol (Flolan), and treprostinil (Remodulin).

Endothelin Receptor Antagonists

Bosentan (Tracleer) is a drug taken by mouth. It is called an endothelin receptor antagonist. It controls endothelin, a powerful molecule that causes blood vessels to narrow. It improves blood flow and is becoming important for treating patients with scleroderma, especially for preventing finger ulcers and improving hand function. This drug is also a treatment option for pulmonary hypertension.

The most effective approach at this time for preventing kidney (renal) crises is to start aggressive blood pressure-lowering treatment before blood tests show kidney damage has occurred.

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors. Many medications are available for controlling blood pressure, but ACE inhibitors appear to be the most effective for scleroderma patients, because of their protective actions in the kidney. These drugs are also used to treat patients with evidence of kidney damage, whether or not they have high blood pressure. ACE inhibitors include captopril (Capoten), enalapril (Vasotec), quinapril (Accupril), benazepril, and lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril). Side effects are uncommon, but may include an irritating cough, large drops in blood pressure, and allergic reactions. The drug picotamide can help reduce the frequency of coughs.

Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (losartan, candesartan cilexetil, and valsartan) have benefits similar to ACE inhibitors and may have fewer or less severe side effects, including coughing. They may also have positive effects on blood vessels. Small studies showing improvement in Raynaud's phenomenon warrant further research.

One major approach to scleroderma is to use treatments that suppress the immune system, and therefore reduce the activity of the harmful processes that lead to scleroderma. Such treatments are used effectively in other autoimmune diseases. Their use in scleroderma varies, depending on the location and severity of the disease process.

Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan). Cyclophosphamide is the most important immunosuppressant currently used for scleroderma. This drug can be taken through a vein (intravenous) or by mouth. It blocks some of the destructive actions of scleroderma in the lungs. Intravenous cyclophosphamide can be life-saving for patients with pneumonia caused by interstitial lung disease. Side effects of this drug include hair loss, infection, and bleeding into the urinary tract. To date, no other immunosuppressive drugs have shown any significant benefits for scleroderma.

Other drugs used to suppress the immune system may be useful in specific cases. They include D-penicillamine (which may be useful for skin symptoms), methotrexate (Rheumatrex), corticosteroids, cyclosporine (Sandimmune, Neoral), and chlorambucil (Leukeran). All of these drugs have potentially severe side effects.

Other Treatments

Tumor-Necrosis Factor Modifiers. Tumor-necrosis factor (TNF) modifiers are major breakthroughs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. They interfere with specific parts of TNF, a powerful immune factor. Researchers believe they should be tested in other inflammatory conditions, including scleroderma. The current agents include infliximab (Remicade), etanercept (Enbrel), alefacept (Amevive), and adalimumab (Humira).

Blood Exchange (Plasmapheresis or photopheresis). Plasmapheresis is a process in which the liquid part of the blood, called plasma, is separated from blood cells. The procedure involves first withdrawing blood from the patient. The plasma, which contains the active immune factors, is discarded and replaced with other fluids. The blood is then returned to the patient.

Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation. Researchers are investigating a possible benefit of transplanting the patient's own stem cells (an autologous transplant). (Patients with autoimmune diseases cannot be given cells from donors.) The transplant procedures introduce normal white blood cells that replace the abnormal autoimmune cells. The procedure has improved or stabilized systemic scleroderma in some patients, with remissions lasting up to 5 years or more, and improvements in skin and overall function. Initial results of ASTIS, a major study evaluating stem-cell transplants and high-dose immunosuppressive therapy in severe scleroderma, indicate that this combination has led to sustained remission in more than one-third of patients. Randomized controlled trials comparing stem cell transplants to monthly cyclophosphamide therapy are underway in Europe and the U.S.

Although the risk of death from having a transplant is now less than 10%, the procedure has serious side effects. Experts suggest that the best candidates are those at high risk for complications from scleroderma. In general, such patients would have diffuse scleroderma, experienced their first symptoms within the previous three years, and have evidence of at least mild abnormalities in the heart, lungs, or kidney. In general, patients with advanced scleroderma would not be the best candidates, because the risks of the procedure would outweigh the risks from the disease.

Extracorporeal Photopheresis: Another phototherapy treatment under investigation, extracorporeal photopheresis, involves withdrawing the patient's blood and treating it with ultraviolet light. Little data exists on its effectiveness. One study found that the therapy improved skin and joint symptoms, but the authors say it's possible that a placebo effect was at least partly responsible for the results. Experts do not recommend photopheresis at this time, but some feel that it does hold promise and warrants more research.

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Animal studies have found that administration of IVIg, an agent that modifies the immune system, may reduce the severity of scleroderma and other autoimmune diseases. So far, only extremely small studies including fewer than 10 patients have been conducted, but the treatment is showing promise for relieving joint pain and tenderness and improving function. The exact role of this therapy in scleroderma treatment, if any, has yet to be determined.

Because of the difficulty in treating scleroderma, many patients are tempted to try high-dose supplements or other alternative treatments. Some natural treatments have been evaluated for the treatment of scleroderma, including para-aminobenzoic acid, vitamin E, evening primrose oil, and an avocado/soybean extract. However, these treatments have not been proven effective, and using alternative remedies can be dangerous.

There is almost no published research on the use of herbal remedies for patients with scleroderma. Generally, manufacturers of herbal remedies and dietary supplements do not need FDA approval to sell their products. Just like a drug, herbs and supplements can affect the body's chemistry, and therefore have the potential to produce side effects that may be harmful. There have been numerous reported cases of serious and even deadly side effects from herbal products. Always check with your doctor before using any herbal remedies or dietary supplements.

Treatment for Raynaud's Phenomenon

The following are some lifestyle tips for managing Raynaud's phenomenon:

Keeping warm is the primary goal for preventing the onset of Raynaud's phenomenon. Air-conditioning and exposure to refrigeration can trigger this syndrome. If patients go out in cold weather, they should dress warmly with many layers. Wearing a hat is essential.
Living in a warm climate may help relieve symptoms, although a recent study found that weather changes themselves had little effect on the disorder.
Exercise is helpful for maintaining a sense of well-being, keeping warm, and sustaining skin flexibility. Patients with Raynaud's phenomenon may want to avoid exercising outdoors in cold weather, however.
Quitting smoking is, of course, essential for anyone, but it is critical for people with scleroderma.
Learning relaxation and anti-stress techniques might help reduce some triggers of Raynaud's phenomenon.
Using moisturizers and antibiotic ointments may be helpful for keeping skin flexible and preventing infections in the fingers.
Avoiding medications such as nonselective beta blockers (such as propranolol), certain common cold preparations, and narcotics, can help avoid aggravating Raynaud's phenomenon.

Vasodilators. Vasodilators open blood vessels and so are important for Raynaud's phenomenon.

Calcium-channel blockers, including diltiazem (Cardizem, Dilacor) and nifedipine (Adalat, Procardia) are the standard vasodilating drugs used for Raynaud's phenomenon. Nifedipine is the best studied of these drugs, but there are also newer dihydropyridines, including felodipine, amlodipine, and isradipine.

Nitrates, available in topical or oral forms, are vasodilators that are also used for Raynaud's phenomenon, and for short-term relief.

Prostacylins. Iloprost and other prostacylins are proving to be effective agents for Raynaud's phenomenon. Small but well done studies seem to show these drugs to be helpful for this condition, and possibly as effective as calcium channel blocker drugs such as nifedipine. Evidence shows that intravenous iloprost given at progressively increasing doses over 3-month cycles can reduce the duration and frequency of attacks. In general, these drugs are used when a patient's symptoms are severe, particularly when the doctor is considering amputating a finger.

Endothelin receptor agonists have also been shown to help with Raynaud's phenomenon.

Anti-Platelet Drugs. Aspirin, dipyridamole, and other drugs that prevent blood clotting and keep blood flowing freely are sometimes recommended to patients with Raynaud's phenomenon. However, these drugs haven't shown much benefit in studies.

Estrogen Therapy in Women. Short-term treatment with estrogen may benefit older women with Raynaud's phenomenon and scleroderma. It is important to note, however, that hormone replacement therapy for more than 5 years can increase a woman's risk for breast cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and blood clots.

PDE5 Inhibitors. Studies have suggested that a class of drugs called PDE5 inhibitors, which includes sildenafil, helps improve symptoms and blood flow, and speeds ulcer healing in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon. This treatment is still experimental.

Sympathectomy and Hand Surgeries. Sympathectomy uses procedures that block or remove the nerve responsible for narrowing blood vessels in the hand. The result is increased blood flow in the hand.

The local anesthetics lidocaine or bupivacaine may be very effective in temporarily restoring blood flow and reducing pain.

For finger ulcers that won't heal and are resistant to standard treatments, sympathectomy surgery may be done.

Treatment for Skin Thickening

Nitroglycerin is a quick acting nitrate and is used as an ointment (Nitro-Bid, Nitrol, Nitrong, Nitrostat) to treat hardened skin. Before applying it, remove any ointment that remains from the previous application.

UVA-1 Phototherapy. Phototherapy (light therapy) is now considered by some experts to be the treatment of choice for local scleroderma. Specifically, doctors favor an approach called ultraviolet A-1 (UVA-1) radiation. This treatment produces long UVA wave lengths that do not cause sunburn and may actually repair DNA in damaged skin cells. Research suggests that UVA-1 therapy blocks inflammatory immune factors and the process leading to over-production of collagen, addressing the underlying mechanisms of scleroderma. The procedure is effective for all stages of morphea. It increases skin elasticity and in some cases, completely clears up symptoms. In one small study, patients with localized scleroderma received 30 phototherapy treatments over a period of 12 weeks. In the majority of patients, 80% of the skin patches disappeared or significantly improved. There were no side effects.

UVA-1 phototherapy is quite expensive and requires a special light source not available everywhere. In addition, studies are reporting an increased risk with UVA radiation. Whether this applies to UVA-1 phototherapy is not yet clear. Nonetheless, phototherapy is still an effective and important treatment of scleroderma. It may prove to be even more beneficial when combined with certain medications, such as calcipotriene (Dovonex), a form of vitamin D3.

PUVA. An alternative phototherapy regimen called PUVA uses drugs called psoralens taken by mouth before UVA treatment. PUVA has been used for other skin diseases, including psoriasis. It may prove useful for patients with early-onset diffuse scleroderma. In one study, most patients treated with PUVA 2 days a month for up to 8 years experienced improvement or stabilization in nearly all scleroderma symptoms. Tests for kidney function remained normal. This treatment is known to increase the risk for skin cancer.

Phototherapy with Psoralen Water Bath. Yet another procedure uses UVA light therapy after patients take a bath containing a solution of psoralen 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP). This treatment is safe and well tolerated, although benefits appear to be minor and occur only in a small subset of patients.

A form of vitamin D3, calcipotriene (Dovonex), appears to help block skin cell production. This vitamin is called calcipotriol in Europe. It also has anti-inflammatory properties, and is being investigated as a rub-on treatment and oral treatment for local scleroderma. It may prove beneficial when combined with low-dose ultraviolet A1 phototherapy.

D-penicillamine is proving to be an effective agent for softening skin and reducing thickness. (Improvements in thickness with this drug have also been associated with improved survival.)

Methotrexate (Rheumatrex) is another commonly used drug, and may be even more effective than penicillamine.

Corticosteroids taken by mouth, such as prednisolone and prednisone, are also often used.

Pilocarpine (Salagen) has been approved for treating dry mouth in people with scleroderma and Sjögren syndrome. In one study, patients with Sjögren syndrome experienced increased salivation after the first dose. Patients reported improvement in speaking, sleeping, and swallowing food without drinking. Side effects of this drug include sweating, increased need to urinate, chills, and flushing.

Other Surgeries. Disabling deformity of the hand is a common feature of scleroderma. Various surgical procedures can relieve pain, prevent tissue loss, protect hand function, and improve the appearance of the hands.

Treatment for Lung Complications

Cyclophosphamide. Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan), an immunosuppressive drug, may be effective for preventing lung deterioration and is the important medication for treating pulmonary fibrosis, particularly when given early in the course of the disease.

Use of this drug may improve survival in patients who show early signs of lung deterioration, notably inflammation in the small lung airways (alveolitis). The drug is not recommended for patents with existing stable pulmonary fibrosis and no signs of inflammation. In one study, patients with early signs of lung inflammation were given a course of intravenous pulses of the corticosteroid methylprednisolone (MP) and cyclophosphamide. Nearly all patients experienced improvement or stabilization during the first year, although the disease had progressed in two-thirds of them after 2 years.

Other Treatments. Lung transplantation may offer hope for people with advanced pulmonary hypertension or interstitial fibrosis that does not respond to conservative treatments.

Several types of drugs are used to treat pulmonary hypertension. Anticoagulants taken by mouth, such as warfarin (Coumadin), are a standard treatment used to prevent blood clots from forming. Diuretic treatment and supplemental oxygen are recommended for patients with fluid retention and low blood oxygen, respectively.

Vasodilators help open blood vessels and relieve pressure in arteries of the lungs. Vasodilators used to treat pulmonary hypertension fall into several different drug classes:

Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs). Some patients with pulmonary hypertension benefit from these drugs. They help relax blood vessels in the heart and lungs, and increase the supply of oxygen. However, calcium channel blockers are only appropriate for patients who meet certain diagnostic criteria, including those who don't have right-sided heart failure. Long-acting nifedipine or diltiazem, or amlodipine, are the preferred calcium channel blockers.

Prostacyclins (Prostaglandins). Prostacyclins, which open blood vessels, are now the primary agents for treating pulmonary hypertension.

Iloprost (Ventavis) is available in inhaled and intravenous forms. Studies suggest that the inhaled form improves exercise capacity and survival in some patients with pulmonary hypertension. In addition, infusions of iloprost remain effective over long periods (up to 3 years) of use.
Treprostinil (Remodulin) is similar to epoprostenol but is more stable. It can also be administered using a portable pump that delivers the drug under the skin. This is less expensive, cumbersome, and invasive than the delivery methods for epoprostenol.
Epoprostenol (Flolan), which is administered intravenously, has improved exercise capacity and symptoms in both the short and long term in a number of patients. In some patients, survival is increased significantly. However, not all patients respond to this drug. The implanted catheter needed to deliver the drug can also cause serious complications.

Endothelin Receptor Antagonists. Bosentan (Tracleer) was the first drug taken by mouth that was approved for pulmonary hypertension. Bosentan controls endothelin, a powerful substance that causes blood vessels to narrow. Studies have reported improved exercise capacity in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Sitaxsentan and ambrisentan (Letairis) are two new drugs being studied.

PDE5 Inhibitors. Sildenafil (Revatio) was approved in 2005 as the first pill for patients with early-stage pulmonary hypertension. Sildenafil is the same medication contained in the erectile dysfunction drug Viagra. However, Revatio is prescribed at a lower dosage than Viagra, and is a different color and shape than Viagra pills.

Other Treatments. Lung transplantation may offer hope for people with advanced pulmonary hypertension that does not respond to conservative measures.

Treatment for Gastrointestinal Problems

Treatments for abnormalities in the esophagus and stomach are generally the same as those for gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) or heartburn. Many non-prescription agents are available for the relief of heartburn.

Proton-pump or acid-pump inhibitors are probably the best drug treatments for reflux symptoms related to scleroderma. They work by inhibiting the so-called gastric acid pump that is required for the cells of the stomach to release acid. The standard drug has been omeprazole (Prilosec). Newer drugs -- including lansoprazole (Prevacid), pantoprazole (Protonix), esomeprazole (Nexium), and rabeprazole (Aciphex) -- are more potent, but few comparison studies have been done on them.

Side Effects. Side effects are uncommon, but can include allergic reaction, headache, stomach pain, diarrhea, and flatulence. Of some concern was a report of a very severe and widespread skin rash caused by omeprazole in a woman with scleroderma. It should be noted that this is only one incident, but patients should be cautious about any skin change when taking this medication.

Metoclopramide. Metoclopramide (Reglan) is sometimes used for patients who have delayed stomach emptying.

Octreotide. Octreotide (Sandostatin) is related to a natural hormone that suppresses growth hormone, and may prove to be very helpful for scleroderma patients. Small studies have reported that this drug improved weight and nutrition. It may even help other symptoms of scleroderma.

Prokinetics. Prokinetics improve the muscle action of the esophagus and enhance stomach emptying. Prucalopride is an investigative pro-kinetic agent that significantly improved symptoms and relieved constipation. Similar medications, such as cisapride (Propulsid), are showing promise; however these types of drugs can have serious side effects.

Antibiotics may be effective for the malabsorption syndrome associated with an increase in bacteria. Octeotride may also be used for this problem.

Strictures (abnormally narrowed regions in the esophagus) may need to be opened with surgery.

Resources

www.scleroderma.org -- Scleroderma Foundation
www.srfcure.org -- Scleroderma Research Foundation
www.arthritis.org -- The Arthritis Foundation
www.niams.nih.gov -- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
www.rheumatology.org -- American College of Rheumatology
www.sclero.org -- International Scleroderma Network
www.sctc-online.org -- Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium
www.phassociation.org -- Pulmonary Hypertension Association
www.thoracic.org -- American Thoracic Society

References

Badesch DB, Abman SH, Simonneau G, Rubin LJ, McLaughlin VV. Medical therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: updated ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2007;131:1917-1928.

Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders; 2006.

Goldman L, Ausiello D. Goldman: Cecil Medicine. 23rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2007.

Grader-Beck T, Wigley FM. Raynaud's phenomenon in mixed connective tissue disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2005;31:465-481.

Henness S, Wigley FM. Current drug therapy for scleroderma and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon: evidence-based review. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007;19:611-618.

Knobler RM, French LE, Kim Y, Bisaccia E, Graninger W, Nahavandi H, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of photopheresis in systemic sclerosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:793-799.

Kreuter A, Hyun J, Stücker M, Sommer A, Altmeyer P, Gambichler T. A randomized controlled study of low-dose UVA1, medium-dose UVA1, and narrowband UVB phototherapy in the treatment of localized scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:440-447.

Mason RJ, Murray JF, Broaddus VC, Nadel JA. Mason: Murray & Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders; 2005.

Nash RA, McSweeney PA, Crofford LJ, Abidi M, Chen CS, Godwin JD, et al. High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis: long-term follow-up of the US multicenter pilot study. Blood. 2007;110:1388-1396.

Ostojic P, Cerinic MM, Silver R, Highland K, Damjanov N. Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Lung. 2007;185:211-220.

Pfizenmaier DH 2nd, Kavros SJ, Liedl DA, Cooper LT. Use of intermittent pneumatic compression for treatment of upper extremity vascular ulcers. Angiology. 2005 Jul-Aug;56(4):417-22.

Schachna L, Medsger TA Jr., Dauber JH, Wigley FM, Braunstein NA, White B, et al. Lung transplantation in scleroderma compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3954-3961.

Shoenfeld Y, Katz U. IVIg therapy in autoimmunity and related disorders: our experience with a large cohort of patients. Autoimmunity. 2005 Mar;38(2):123-37.

Steen VD. Pregnancy in scleroderma. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33:345-358.

Tashkin DP, Elashoff R, Clements PJ, et al. Cyclophosphamide versus placebo in scleroderma lung disease. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(25):2655-66.

Thombs BD, Taillefer SS, Hudson M, Baron M. Depression in patients with systemic sclerosis: a systematic review of the evidence. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1089-1097.

Tyndall A, Furst DE. Adult stem cell treatment of scleroderma. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007;19:604-610.

van Laar JM. High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous progenitor cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2004; 17(2): 233-45.

Review Date:
1/15/2008
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Editor-in-Chief, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital. Also reviewed by David Zieve, MD, MHA, Medical Director, A.D.A.M., Inc.

A.D.A.M., Inc. is accredited by URAC, also known as the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission (www.urac.org). URAC's accreditation program is an independent audit to verify that A.D.A.M. follows rigorous standards of quality and accountability. A.D.A.M. is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial policy, editorial process and privacy policy. A.D.A.M. is also a founding member of Hi-Ethics and subscribes to the principles of the Health on the Net Foundation (www.hon.ch).

A.D.A.M. Copyright

The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical professional should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. © 1997-2009 A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.

adam.com

Systemic lupus erythematosus

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:17 -0700

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Systematic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

SLE is an autoimmune disease that causes a chronic inflammatory condition. The inflammation triggered by SLE affects many organs in the body, including skin, joints, kidneys, lung, and nervous system. Women, especially African-American and Asian women, are at highest risk for developing SLE.

Symptoms and Diagnosis

Not all patients with SLE experience the same symptoms. The most common symptoms are joint pain, skin rash, and fever. Symptoms can develop slowly or appear suddenly. Many patients with SLE have “flares,” in which symptoms suddenly worsen and then disappear for long periods of time. Diagnosing SLE is complicated because symptoms vary widely and can resemble other conditions. A doctor will base an SLE diagnosis on certain specific criteria including symptom history and the results of blood tests for antinuclear antibodies.

Treatment

No drug can cure SLE, but many different drugs can help control symptoms and relieve discomfort. The choice of drugs depends on the severity of the condition as well as other factors. Patients with mild SLE may be helped by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) while patients with more severe SLE may require corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. Researchers are working to develop new drugs and treatments for SLE.

Living with SLE

Patients can make lifestyle changes to help cope with SLE. These include:

Avoid excessive sunlight exposure, and wear sunscreen (ultraviolet light is the one of the main triggers of flares).
Get plenty of rest (fatigue is another common SLE symptom).
Engage in regular light-to-moderate exercise to help fight fatigue and heart disease, and to keep joints flexible.

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, often life-long, autoimmune disease. It can be mild to severe, and affects mostly women. SLE may affect various parts of the body, but it most often manifests in the skin, joints, blood, and kidneys. SLE was first described in 1828. Its very name helps define the disease:

Systemic is used because the disease can affect organs and tissue throughout the body.
Lupus is Latin for wolf. It refers to the rash that extends across the bridge of the nose and upper cheekbones and was thought to resemble a wolf bite.
Erythematosus is from the Greek word for red and refers to the color of the rash.

Lupus has many different symptoms. Common ones include:

Fatigue
Joint pain or swelling
Skin rashes

Causes

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a complex disorder that occurs as a consequence of a number of independent processes and factors.

Environmental factors, such as viruses, exposure to chemicals, or sunlight trigger inflammatory or immune activity. This immune activation may begin as an appropriate response to an unwanted "invader." But, because of a combination of genetic factors, an individual with lupus develops an ongoing immune response that does not shut itself off appropriately. This leads to waxing and waning flares of inflammation that can involve various organs of the body, depending on specific features of this self-perpetuating immune response in individual patients.

The exact combination of genes that predispose individuals to SLE may differ somewhat from patient to patient, but probably share certain common features which tend to impair the ability of the body to get rid of immune-triggering particles and which tend to prolong or increase the degree of immune responsiveness to these triggers.

A major characteristic of lupus is that it is an autoimmune response in which immune factors, called autoantibodies, attack the person's own cells. Some autoantibodies are normal in a well-balanced immune system, and serve various roles to help the body dispose of wastes, protect from infectious invaders, and to keep blood vessels clear. In healthy people, autoantibodies tend to be well-regulated and well "masked," or covered up, until needed. Therefore, it is probably the high activity and high detectability of autoantibodies that makes lupus unique, not the fact that they exist.

The Normal Immune System Response. The inflammatory process is a byproduct of the activity of the body's immune system, which fights infection and heals wounds and injuries:

When an injury or an infection occurs, white blood cells are mobilized to rid the body of any foreign proteins, such as a virus.
The masses of blood cells that gather at the injured or infected site produce factors to fight any infections.
In the process, the surrounding area becomes inflamed and some healthy tissue is injured. The immune system is then called upon to repair wounds by clotting any bleeding blood vessels and initiating fiber-like patches to the tissue.
Under normal conditions, the immune system has special factors that control and limit this inflammatory process.

The Infection Fighters. B cells and T cells are two important components of the immune system that play a role in the inflammation associated with lupus. Both B cells and T cells belong to a family of immune cells called lymphocytes. Lymphocytes help fight infection.

B cells and T cells are involved in the immune system's response to infection. Antigens are foreign bodies (such as bacteria and viruses) that stimulate the immune system to produce autoantibodies. When a T cell recognizes an antigen it will produce chemicals (cytokines) that cause B cells to multiply and release many immune proteins (antibodies). These antibodies circulate widely in the bloodstream, recognizing the foreign particles and triggering inflammation in order to rid the body of the invasion.

An antigen is a substance that can provoke an immune response. Typically antigens are substances not usually found in the body.

For reasons that are still not completely understood, both the T cells and B cells become overactive in lupus patients. In lupus, a complex interaction between activated immune cells and an impaired antigen-elimination process leads to a greater than normal range of what the antibodies recognize. Eventually, antibodies are made that recognize more of the body's own tissues in a stronger or more persistent manner than is healthy, and inflammatory responses are mounted in these tissues.

Autoantibodies. In the majority of patients with SLE, antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are detectable. Such autoantibodies may be present in individuals up to 7 years prior to their developing symptoms of lupus. Some subtypes of ANA are found in lupus patients and only rarely in people without lupus. These include:

Anti-ds DNA. An autoantibody called anti-double stranded DNA (anti-ds DNA) may play an important role in some lupus patients.
Anti-Sm antibodies. This antibody is found most often in lupus patients of African descent and is almost never detected in people without lupus.
Anti-Ro (SSA) and Anti-La (SSB)
Antiphospholipid antibodies

Cytokines. Most immune cells secrete or stimulate the production of powerful immune factors called cytokines. In small amounts, cytokines are indispensable for maintaining the balance of the body during immune responses, including:

Infections
Injuries
Tissue repair
Blood clotting
Clearing of debris from inflamed blood vessels
Other aspects of healing.

If overproduced, however, they can cause serious damage, including dangerous levels of inflammation and cellular injury. Specific cytokines called interferons and interleukins play a critical role in SLE by regulating the secretion of autoantibodies by B cells.

Complement. Another immune factor of high interest in SLE is the complement system. This is comprised of more than 30 proteins and is important for defending and regulating the immune response. Inherited deficiencies in certain complement components (C1q, C1r, C1s, C4, and C2) have long been associated with SLE.

Researchers estimated that 20 - 100 different genetic factors may be involved in the alterations of the immune system set point that could make a person susceptible to SLE.

Research published in 2003 identified a particular set of genes, now commonly called the "interferon signature," that is activated by interferon in patients with severe lupus. This discovery may help doctors identify patients at particular risk for severe disease before they develop symptoms.
A genetic risk factor for lupus in African-American women has been identified.
Other research has identified defects in genes that regulate apoptosis, the natural process by which cells self-destruct.
An abnormal gene identified in some patients with SLE promotes the build-up of immune complexes that can cause kidney damage. HLA (human leukocyte antigen) is a protein that presents antigens to T cells by holding them up from the surface of macrophages or other antigen-presenting cells. Among the types of HLA associated with lupus are HLA-DR2, -DR3, -A1, -B8, and DMA-0104.

In genetically susceptible people, there are various external factors that can provoke an immune response. Possible SLE triggers include colds, fatigue, stress, chemicals, sunlight, and certain drugs.

Viruses. Blood tests reveal that patients with SLE are more likely to have been exposed to certain viruses than the general population. These viruses include the Epstein-Barr virus (the cause of mononucleosis), cytomegalovirus, and parvovirus-B1.

Results from a 2005 study, conducted by researchers at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, suggested a strong association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and increased risk of lupus, particularly for African-Americans. The association was not as strong for whites, but increased with age (patients over 50 years of age had four times higher risk).

The researchers also observed that a genetic variation in CTLA-4, a protein that helps regulate T cell immune system response, appeared to modify the risk of lupus associated with EBV-IgA antibodies. Therefore, an individual’s CTLA-4 genotype could determine the immune system’s responsiveness in fighting repeat episodes of EBV infection.

Click the icon to see an image of mononucleosis.

Some research suggests that different viruses may imprint specific types of SLE. For instance cytomegalovirus may affect blood vessels and cause problems such as Raynaud's phenomenon or blood abnormalities, but may not affect the kidney as much. These are speculations, however, and not a proven association.

Sunlight. Ultraviolet (UV) rays found in sunlight are important SLE triggers. When they bombard the skin, they can alter the structure of DNA in cells below the surface. The immune system may perceive these altered skin cells as foreign and trigger an autoimmune response against them. UV light is categorized as UVB or UVA depending on the length of the wave.

UVB are short waves (280 - 320 nm). The shorter the wavelengths, the more damage they do.
UVA are longer waves (320 - 400 nm). Some research suggests that UVA wavelengths in the longest range, known as UVA1 (340 - 400 nm), may actually repair DNA and normalize immune responses.

Chemicals. Clusters of SLE cases have occurred in populations with high exposure to certain chemicals. Chlorinated pesticides and crystalline silica are two suspects. A number of other chemicals are under investigation. However, it is very difficult to determine a causal role for any specific chemicals. (Silicone breast implants have been under intense scrutiny as a possible trigger of autoimmune diseases, including SLE. The weight of evidence to date, however, finds no support for this concern.) Some drugs have been associated with a temporary lupus syndrome (drug-induced lupus), which resolves when these drugs are stopped.

Hormones. Cytokines, major immune factors that are active in SLE, are directly affected by sex hormones. In general, estrogen enhances antibody production, and testosterone reduces antibody production, although their exact role in SLE may be more complicated than that since there are various ways in which each hormone might influence various immune cells. Women with SLE may have lower levels of several active male hormones (androgens), and some men who are affected by SLE may also have abnormal androgen levels.

Premature menopause, and its accompanying symptoms (such as hot flashes), is common in women with SLE. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT), which is used to relieve these symptoms, increases the risk for blood clots and heart problems. It is not clear whether HRT triggers SLE flares. Women should discuss with their doctors whether HRT is an appropriate and safe choice. Guidelines recommend that women who take HRT use the lowest possible dose for the shortest possible time. Women with SLE who have active disease, antiphospholipid antibodies, or a history of blood clots or heart disease should not use HRT.

Oral Contraceptives. Female patients with lupus used to be cautioned against taking oral contraceptives (OCs) due to the possibility that estrogen could trigger lupus flare-ups. However, recent evidence indicates that OCs are safe, at least for women with inactive or stable lupus. Women who have been newly diagnosed with lupus should avoid OCs. Lupus can cause complications in its early stages. For this reason, women should wait until the disease reaches a stable state before taking OCs. In addition, women who have a history of, or who are at high risk for, blood clots (particularly women with antiphospholipid syndrome) should not use OCs. The estrogen in OCs increases the risk for blood clots.

Risk Factors

The number of people diagnosed with lupus has more than tripled over the past four decades. Some experts believe this may simply indicate a greater degree of doctor training in recognizing the syndrome.

About 90% of lupus patients are women, most diagnosed when they are in their childbearing ages. Hormones may be an explanation. After menopause, women are only 2.5 times as likely as men to contract SLE. Flares also become somewhat less common after menopause in women who have chronic SLE.

African-Americans are three to four times more likely to develop the disease than Caucasians and to have severe complications. Hispanics and Asians are also more susceptible to the disease.

A family history plays a strong role in SLE. A brother or sister of a patient with the disorder has 20 times the risk as someone without an immediate family member with SLE.

The disease is rare in childhood. When it does occur, it is often associated with thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura, a condition resulting from abnormally low levels of blood platelets. SLE in children may also be caused by certain medications, including minocycline and zafirlukast.

Rheumatoid Arthritis. Studies have investigated the relationship among hormones, SLE, and rheumatoid arthritis, another autoimmune disease. Higher levels of estrogen are associated with SLE, while lower levels are associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Some research suggests that some patients, in fact, progress from one disease to the other, and that such transitions occur during major hormonal shifts, such as the onset of menopause or pregnancy.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic autoimmune disease that initially attacks the lining, or synovium, of the joints.

Many prescription drugs can cause lupus-like skin symptoms. In one study, the most common drugs causing these symptoms were high blood pressure (hypertension) medications, including hydrochlorothiazide, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, and calcium-channel blockers. About 40 different drugs have been linked to lupus onset. Anyone diagnosed with cutaneous lupus erythematosus should be sure to tell their doctors all the medications (including herbs and supplements) that they are taking.

Smoking. Smoking may be a risk factor for triggering SLE and can increase the risk for skin and kidney problems in women who have the disease.

Symptoms

SLE symptoms may develop slowly over months or years, or they may appear suddenly. Symptoms tend to be worse during winter months, perhaps because prolonged exposure to sunlight in the summer causes a gradual build-up of factors that trigger symptoms months later.

The most common symptom is joint pain, which occurs in about 90% of patients with SLE. Characteristics of this symptom vary widely:

It is often accompanied by swelling and redness.
It can last from hours to months.
It may be mild or severe.
It can occur in one joint, move from one to another, or flare erratically.
Pain often occurs in the morning and improves during the day, only to return later when the patient tires.
The joints most affected are fingers, wrists, elbows, knees, and ankles. (Joints in the spine and neck are not affected.)

Children may experience these symptoms as growing pains, and, in all patients, they may be the only symptoms for many years.

Fever occurs in 90% of patients with SLE and is usually caused by the inflammatory process of the disease, not by infection. It is low-grade except during an acute lupus crisis.

Three-quarters of patients with SLE have skin inflammation and skin lesions (ulcers, rashes, or other injured areas). About half of these lesions are photosensitive; that is, they are aggravated by ultraviolet (UV) radiation from sunlight, even from light coming through a window. (UV radiation may even trigger systemic flares in patients with SLE.)

A number of different skin conditions have been described in patients with SLE.

Discoid Lupus Erythematosus. About 20% of patients have discoid lesions. In such cases, the condition is often known as discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). Patients with this condition may have the following skin abnormalities:

Discoid means coin-shaped, so these lesions are round and raised. They are also scaly. Untreated, the margins gradually extend outward as the center dries out and shrivels, causing severe scarring. If discoid lesions appear on the scalp, they can plug hair follicles and cause irreversible hair loss. Discoid lesions can also appear on the upper body.

Lupus, discoid -- view of lesions on the chest: This close-up picture of the neck clearly shows the typical rounded appearance of discoid lupus. The whitish appearance is caused by scaling. The two dark spots are biopsy sites and are not part of the disease.

A butterfly-shaped rash across the face may accompany this condition. This rash causes little scarring, although spidery, branching lines of swollen capillaries (the tiniest blood vessels) may appear.

Click the icon to see an image of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Most patients with this condition have only a limited skin disorder. In only about 10% of cases does discoid lupus develop into full-blown SLE.

Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) can cause skin lesions on parts of the body that are exposed to sunlight. These lesions do not cause scarring.

Vasculitis. Patients with SLE sometimes develop inflammation in the blood vessels (vasculitis) that may have the following effects on the skin:

Red welts may form across large areas of the body.
Sometimes deep red bumps may appear, particularly on the leg, where they may ulcerate.
In some people, reddish-purple lesions appear on the pads of fingers and toes or near the nails of fingers and toes.
Lesions caused by vasculitis may ulcerate or blister if they erupt on mucous membranes in the mouth, nose, or vagina and can be painful if they occur on the throat.
Vasulitis can attack blood vessels in almost any other organ, including the brain, the heart, and the gastrointestinal tract.

Click the icon to see an image of vasculitis.

Other symptoms include:

Fatigue
Loss of appetite, nausea, and weight loss
Chest pain
Bruising
Menstrual irregularities
Thought and concentration disturbances
Personality changes
Sleep disorders, such as restless legs syndrome and sleep apnea
Dryness of the eyes and mouth
Brittle hair or hair loss

Hair loss or breakage may also occur in about half of patients with SLE during severe flares or after pregnancy or severe illness. In such cases, hair grows back.

Raynaud's phenomenon is a condition in which cold or stress can cause spasms in impaired blood vessels, resulting in pain in fingers and toes. It occurs as part of the inflammatory response in blood vessels, which can narrow them and reduce circulation. In extreme cases, gangrene can result.

Click the icon to see an image of Raynaud's phenomenon.

A number of conditions may resemble SLE:

Scleroderma: Hardening of the skin caused by overproduction of collagen
Multiple sclerosis: Fatigue, heaviness or clumsiness in the arms and legs
Rheumatoid arthritis: Inflammation of the lining of the joints
Sjögren syndrome: Characterized by dry eyes and dry mouth
Mixed connective tissue disorder: Similar to SLE, but milder
Myositis: Inflammation and degeneration of muscle tissues
Rosacea: Flushed face with pus-filled blisters
Seborrheic dermatitis: Sores on lips and nose
Lichen planus: Swollen rash that itches, typically on scalp, arms, legs, or in the mouth
Dermatomyositis: Bluish-red skin eruptions on face and upper body
Lyme disease: Bulls-eye rash, joint inflammation, and flu-like symptoms

Complications

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is one of the most serious rheumatic diseases. According to a 2002 government study, the annual number of deaths has risen from 879 - 1,406 since 1979. About a third of these deaths occur in people aged 15 - 44 years, mostly women. Such numbers may be underestimates, since SLE can affect so many organs that a cause of death in some people with SLE may not be directly attributed to the condition. A primary cause of death among patients with lupus is atherosclerosis, a disease of the coronary blood vessels resulting from accelerated buildup of plaque.

SLE is unpredictable and varies greatly form one individual to the next. Severity also appears to differ among ethnic groups and countries. In European and North American patients with SLE for example, overall 5-year survival rates are 93 - 95%, while in Asia or Africa they are considerable lower (60 - 70%). Other research indicates that African-American and Hispanic American patients suffer greater organ damage than Caucasian patients. Genetic factors appear to have some influence on specific effects of SLE on organ damage among ethnic groups. However, the poorer outlook among minority groups and in underdeveloped nations is probably due to less access to good health care.

Mild SLE. About 20 - 30% of cases are mild. For many of these patients, the only symptoms may be the skin rashes of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) or subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) with or without joint aches. The number and intensity of symptoms in mild cases often decrease over time, as does the likelihood of major organ involvement. These skin conditions, however, are not absolute insurance against more severe disease, and patients with mild SLE should be tested for organ involvement.

Widespread SLE. Most commonly, SLE is a chronic, life-long disease, alternating between periods of symptom relapse, (called flares), and remission. The disease may begin in any of the various systems of the body and progress unpredictably to others. The following are typical patterns:

Symptom relapses, or flares, occur on the average of two or three times a year.
Between flares, most patients with SLE function at about 90% of normal capacity.

The degree of severity depends on different factors:

Severity of the inflammatory response
Frequency of episodes
The degree of organ or system involvement

Vital organs or systems, such as lungs, kidneys, nervous system, joints skin, and others are affected in 50 - 75% of patients with SLE. Infections followed by kidney failure are the chief causes of death in patients with SLE.

Because of more effective and aggressive treatment, the prognosis for SLE has improved markedly over the past two decades. Long-term progress of the disease is affected greatly by treatment in the initial acute phase of the disease, so a speedy and accurate diagnosis is all-important. The 10-year survival rate with treatment is now 85 - 95%, and many people have a normal life span. SLE that develops later in life is generally less serious than SLE that strikes in childhood.

Almost 85% of patients with SLE experience problems associated with abnormalities in the blood.

Anemia. About half of patients with SLE are anemic. Causes include:

Iron deficiencies resulting from excessive menstruation
Iron deficiencies from gastro-intestinal bleeding caused by some of the treatments
A specific anemia called hemolytic anemia, which destroys red blood cells
Anemia of chronic disease

Hemolytic anemia can occur with very high levels of the anticardiolipin antibody. It can be chronic or develop suddenly and be severely (acute).

Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Between 34 - 42% of patients with SLE have antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This is a specific set of conditions related to the presence of autoantibodies called lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin. These autoantibodies react against fat molecules called phospholipids, and so are called antiphospholipids. Their actions have complex effects that include causing narrowing and abnormalities of blood vessels.

Patients who have APS have a very incidence of blood clots, which most often occur in the deep veins in the legs (32%). Blood clotting, in turn, puts patients at higher risk for stroke (13%) and pulmonary embolism (clots in the lungs) (9%).

This picture shows a red and swollen thigh and leg caused by a blood clot (thrombus) in the deep veins in the groin (iliofemoral veins). Such a clot prevents normal return of blood from the leg to the heart.

About 22% of patients have thrombocytopenia -- a reduction in blood platelets that can cause bleeding.
The effects on blood vessels have also been associated with confusion, headaches, and seizures. Leg ulcers can also develop.
Patients with APS who become pregnant have a high incidence of pregnancy loss, especially in the late term.

Not all patients with APS carry both of the autoantibodies, and they can also wax and wane and so have varying effects. APS also occurs without lupus in about half of patients with the syndrome.

Thrombocytopenia. In thrombocytopenia, antibodies attack blood platelets. In such cases, blood clotting is impaired, which causes bruising and bleeding from the skin, nose, gums, or intestines. (This condition can also occur in APS, but it is not considered to be one of the standard features of the syndrome.)

Neutropenia. Neutropenia is a drop in the number of white blood cells. Patients with SLE often neutropenia, but the condition is usually harmless unless the reductions are so severe that they leave the patient vulnerable to infections.

Acute Lupus Hemophagocyte Syndrome. A rare blood complication of SLE that occurs primarily in Asians is called acute lupus hemophagocytic syndrome. It is generally of short duration and characterized by fever and a sudden drop in blood cells and platelets.

Lymphomas. Patients with SLE and other autoimmune disorders have a greater risk for developing lymph system cancers such as Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). A 2005 study reported that patients with SLE were over seven times more likely to develop NHL than healthy patients.

Heart disease is a primary cause of death in lupus patients. The immune response in SLE can cause inflammation and other damaging effects that can cause significant injury to the arteries and tissues associated with the circulation and the heart. In addition, SLE treatments (particularly corticosteroids) affect cholesterol, weight, and other factors that can also affect the heart. For decades, experts questioned the extent to which the drugs used to treat SLE contributed to the high rate of atherosclerosis in such patients. Numerous studies now suggest that something about the disease process itself, possibly the chronic inflammation of the blood vessels, probably lies at the root of this dangerous problem. In any event, patients with SLE, have a higher chance for the following conditions, which put them at risk for heart attack or stroke:

Atherosclerosis, or plaque buildup in the arteries
Increased stiffness in the arteries
Unhealthy cholesterol and lipid (fatty molecules) levels
High blood pressure, most likely because of kidney injury and corticosteroid treatments
Congestive heart failure
Pericarditis, an inflammation of the tissue surrounding the heart (occurs in about 30% of patients)
Myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle itself (rare)

Click the icon to see an image of pericarditis.

Abnormalities in the valves of the heart (rare)
Blood clots

The risk for cardiovascular disease, heart attack, and stroke is much higher than average in younger women with SLE. The risks decline as such women age.

SLE affects the lungs in about 60% of patients:

Recurrent inflammation of the membrane lining the lung (pleurisy) is the most common problem.
In some cases, fluid accumulates, a condition called pleural effusion, and can cause stabbing localized pain that worsens when coughing, sneezing, laughing, or taking a deep breath.
Inflammation of the lung itself in SLE is called lupus pneumonitis. It can be caused by infections or by the SLE inflammatory process. Symptoms are the same in both cases: fever, chest pain, labored breathing, and coughing. Rarely, lupus pneumonitis becomes chronic and causes scarring in the lungs, which reduces their ability to deliver oxygen to the blood.
A very serious and also rare condition called pulmonary hypertension occurs when high pressure develops in the vessels supplying blood to the lungs.

Click the icon to see an image of primary pulmonary hypertension.

The kidneys are a crucial battleground in SLE because it is here that the debris left over from the immune attacks is most likely to be deposited. About 50% of patients with SLE exhibit inflammation of the kidneys (called lupus nephritis).This condition occurs in different forms and can vary widely in severity.

Click the icon to see an image of the kidney.

Proliferative nephritis is a serious variant of lupus nephritis. It occurs when the inflammatory process causes widespread damage and scarring in the blood vessels of the kidneys, which filters waste products, water, and salts out of the blood. The condition is associated with high blood pressure and kidney deterioration.
Membranous lupus nephritis is another variant that is often associated with a good outlook. In some cases, however, if the kidney is persistently exposed to high protein levels, the disorder can progress to fatal end-stage kidney (renal) disease.

Serious complications occur eventually in about 30% of patients. If kidney injury develops, it almost always occurs within 10 years of the onset of SLE, rarely after that.

Nearly all patients with SLE report some symptoms relating to problems that occur in the central nervous system (CNS), which includes the spinal cord and the brain. Most of these symptoms are minor and some, such as headache, may be related to depression rather than the disease itself. CNS involvement is more likely to occur in the first year, usually during flare-ups in other organs. Symptoms vary widely and may be indistinguishable from psychiatric or neurologic disorders or from the side effects of some medications used for SLE. Central nervous system symptoms are usually mild, but there is little effective treatment available for them. CNS symptoms get worse as the disease progresses.

The most serious CNS disorder is inflammation of the blood vessels in the brain, which occurs in 10% of patients with SLE. Fever, seizures, psychosis, and even coma can occur. Other CNS side effects include:

Irritability
Emotional disorders (anxiety, depression)
Mild impairment of concentration and memory
Migraine and tension headaches
Problems with the reflex systems, sensation, vision, hearing, and motor control

Infections are a common complication and a major cause of death in all stages of SLE. The immune system is indeed overactive in SLE, but it is also abnormal and reduces the ability to fight infections. Patients are not only prone to the ordinary streptococcal and staphylococcal infections, but they are also susceptible to fungal and parasitic infections (called opportunistic infections), which are common in people with weakened immune systems. They also face an increased risk for herpes, salmonella, and yeast infections. Corticosteroid and immunosuppressants, treatments used for SLE, also increase the risk for infections, thereby compounding the problem.

About 45% of patients with SLE suffer gastrointestinal problems, including nausea, weight loss, mild abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Severe inflammation of the intestinal tract occurs in less than 5% of patients and causes acute cramping, vomiting, diarrhea, and, rarely, intestinal perforation, which can be life-threatening. Fluid retention and swelling can cause intestinal obstruction, which is much less serious but causes the same type of severe pain. Inflammation of the pancreas can be caused by the disease and by corticosteroid therapy.

Arthritis caused by SLE almost never leads to destruction or deformity of joints. The inflammatory process can, however, damage muscles and cause weakness. Patients with SLE also commonly experience reductions in bone mass density (osteoporosis) and have a higher risk for fractures, whether or not they are taking corticosteroids (which can increase the risk for osteoporosis). Women who have SLE should have regular bone mineral density scans to monitor bone health.

Click the icon to see an image of osteoporosis.

Inflamed blood vessels in the eye can reduce blood supply to the retina, resulting in degeneration of nerve cells and a risk of hemorrhage in the retina. The most common symptoms are cotton-wool-like spots on the retina. In about 5% of patients sudden temporary blindness may occur.

In one study, 40% of patients with SLE quit work within 4 years of diagnosis, and many had to modify their work conditions. Significant factors that predicted job loss included high physical demands from the work itself, a more severe condition at the time of diagnosis, and lower educational levels. People with lower income jobs were at particular risk for leaving them.

Women with lupus who conceive face high-risk pregnancies. It is important for women to understand the potential complications and plan accordingly. The most important advice is to avoid becoming pregnant when lupus is active.

Research suggests that the following factors predict a successful pregnancy:

Disease state at time of conception. Experts strongly recommend that women wait to conceive until their disease state has been inactive for at least 6 months.
Kidney (renal) function. Women should make sure that their kidney function is evaluated prior to conception. Poor kidney function can worsen high blood pressure and cause excess protein in the urine. These complications increase the risk for preeclampsia and miscarriage.
Lupus-related antibodies. Antiphospholipid and anticardiolipin antibodies can increase the risks for preeclampsia, miscarriage, and stillbirths. Anti-SSA and anti-SSB antibodies can increase the risk for neonatal lupus erythematosus, a condition that can cause skin rash and liver and heart damage to the newborn baby. Levels of these antibodies should be tested at the start of pregnancy. Certain medications (aspirin, heparin) and tests (fetal heart monitoring) may be needed to ensure a safe pregnancy.
Medication use during pregnancy. Women with active disease may need to take low-dose corticosteroids, but women with inactive disease should avoid these drugs. Steroids appear to pose a low risk for birth defects, but can increase a pregnant woman’s risks for gestational diabetes, high blood pressure, infection, and osteoporosis. For patients who need immunosuppressive therapy, azathioprine (Imuran) is an option. Methotrexate (Rheumatrex) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) should not be taken during pregnancy.

Pregnancy Risks

Women with lupus are 20 times more likely to die during pregnancy than women without the disease. The risk for maternal death is due to the following serious conditions that can develop during pregnancy:

Miscarriages. About 25% of lupus pregnancies result in miscarriage. The risk is highest for patients with antiphospholipid antibodies, active kidney disease, or high blood pressure.
Blood clots. Women with lupus have a 6 times greater risk for developing deep vein thrombosis (blood clots) than women without the disease.
Clotting complications. Low blood platelet count and anemia are also risks. Women with lupus are 3 times more likely to need a transfusion during pregnancy than women without lupus.
Infections. Blood infections (sepsis), pneumonia, and urinary tract infections are more common in pregnant women with lupus.
Preeclampsia. Women with lupus are three times more likely than healthy women to develop preeclampsia (pregnancy-related high blood pressure), which can be potentially life threatening.

Birth Complications

Pre-term birth. Women with lupus are 2.5 times more likely to have pre-term labor than women without lupus. Pre-term labor increases the risk for giving birth to low-weight babies.
Stillbirths. A 2005 study reported that the risk of still births was 10 times greater for women who had not yet been diagnosed with lupus, and 4 times greater for women with diagnosed lupus, compared with healthy women. This suggests that lupus may have a pre-disease state.
Caesarean section. Thirty-seven percent of women with lupus require a C-section compared with 22% of women without the disease.

Despite these obstacles, many women with lupus have healthy pregnancies and deliver healthy babies. To increase the odds of a successful pregnancy, it is important for women to plan carefully before becoming pregnant. Be sure to find knowledgeable doctors with whom you can communicate and trust. Experts recommend that pregnant women with lupus assemble an interdisciplinary health care team that includes a rheumatologist, high-risk obstetrician, and (for patients with kidney disease) a nephrologist.

Diagnosis

No single test can confirm or rule out SLE. A number of tests are required before SLE can be diagnosed definitively. The first symptoms of SLE can resemble one of many syndromes or disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, Still's disease, rheumatic fever, Lyme disease, multiple sclerosis, thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura, cryoglobulinemia, Weber-Christian disease, viral infections, vasculitis, psychosis, and other conditions. Other autoimmune disorders, such as Sjögren syndrome or scleroderma, may even be present at the same time as SLE.

1. Characteristic rash across the cheek

2. Discoid lesion rash

3. Photosensitivity

4. Oral ulcers

5. Arthritis

6. Inflammation of membranes in the lungs, the heart, or the abdomen

7. Evidence of kidney disease

8. Evidence of severe neurologic disease

9. Blood disorders, including low red and white blood cell and platelet counts

10. Immunologic abnormalities

11. Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA)

Note: A patient must experienced four of the criteria before a doctor can classify the condition as SLE. These criteria, proposed by the American College of Rheumatology, are not to be relied upon solely for diagnosis, however.

Methods for measuring the antibodies involved with SLE vary, and the range of results can be bewildering. Repeat tests may be needed.

Antinuclear Antibodies (ANAs). A primary test for SLE checks for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), which attack the cell nucleus.

High levels of ANA are found in more than 98% of patients with SLE. A number of other conditions, however, also cause high levels of ANA, so a positive test is not a definite diagnosis for SLE:

Antinuclear antibodies may be strongly present in other autoimmune diseases (such as scleroderma, Sjögren syndrome, or rheumatoid arthritis).
They also may be weakly present in about 20 - 40% of healthy women.
Some drugs can also produce positive antibody tests, including hydralazine, procainamide, isoniazid, and chlorpromazine.

A negative ANA test makes a diagnosis of SLE unlikely but not impossible. High or low concentrations of ANA also do not necessarily indicate the severity of the disease, since antibodies tend to come and go in patients with SLE.

In general, the ANA test is considered a screening test:

If SLE symptoms are present and the ANA test is positive, other tests for SLE will be administered.
If SLE symptoms are not present and the test is positive, the doctor will look for other causes, or the results will be ignored if the patient is feeling healthy.

ANA Subtypes. In some cases, doctors may test for specific ANA subtypes.

Anti-double stranded DNA (Anti-ds DNA) is usually found only in patients with SLE. It may play an important role in injury to blood vessels found in SLE, and high levels often indicate kidney involvement. Anti-ds DNA levels tend to fluctuate over time and may even disappear.
Anti-Sm antibodies are also usually found only with SLE. They are more constant and are more likely to be detected in African-American patients. Although the antibody is not usually seen in lupus patients, its confirmed presence almost always indicates SLE.
When the ANA is negative but the diagnosis is still strongly suspected, a test for anti-Ro (also called anti-SSA) and anti-La (also called anti-SSB) antibodies may identify patients with a rare condition called ANA negative, Ro lupus. These autoantibodies may be involved in the sun-sensitive rashes experienced by patients with SLE and are also found in association with neonatal lupus syndrome, in which a pregnant mother's antibodies cross the placenta and cause inflammation in the developing child's skin or heart.

Antibodies to SR Proteins. An advance in diagnosing SLE has been the detection of antibodies to molecules called SR proteins, which are carried by most patients. The test accurately detects lupus in 50 - 70% of patients who test positive for these antibodies.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies. In patients with SLE in whom blood abnormalities are suspected, tests may be able to detect the presence of the two major antiphospholipid antibodies:

A quarter to a half of patients with SLE may have these antibodies. They attack blood-clotting regulator proteins that stick to phospholipids, fatty compounds found in cell membranes throughout the body. Antiphospholipid antibodies increase the risks for blood clots and may be responsible for narrowing of (and irregularities in) blood vessels. Antiphospholipid antibodies are linked with miscarriages and other pregnancy complications, strokes, heart attacks and blood clots in almost any part of the body, including kidneys, legs, lungs, and eyes.
The test for the lupus anticoagulant antibody measures the time it takes blood to clot. A longer than normal blood clotting time indicates a higher chance for clotting in the body and, therefore, the presence of lupus anticoagulant.
An ELISA test (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) is performed to detect the anticardiolipin antibody.

As with the ANA, these antibodies also have a tendency to appear and disappear in a single patient. Patients who have these autoantibodies as well as blood clotting problems or frequent miscarriage are diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which often occurs in SLE but can also develop independently.

Complement. Blood tests of patients with SLE often show low levels of serum complement, a protein in the blood that aids the body's infection fighters. Individual proteins are termed by the letter "C" followed by a number. Common complement tests measure C3, C4, C1q, and CH50. There is some evidence that complete deficiencies of C1q may be a key factor in the inability of the immune system to contain the autoimmunity process. Complement levels are especially low if there is kidney involvement or other disease activity.

LE Cell Tests. The first blood test ever used for SLE called LE (lupus erythematosus) cell test is positive in only about half of patients with SLE and is no longer used that often.

Blood Count. White and red blood cell and platelet counts are usually lower than normal and, depending on severity, are used to determine complications, such as anemia or infection.

Click the icon to see an image of the formed elements of blood.

If a skin rash is present, the doctor may take a biopsy (a tissue sample) from the margin of a skin lesion. A test known as a lupus band detects antibodies known as immunoglobulin G (IgG), which are located just below the outer layer of the tissue sample. They are present in about 80% of patients with active SLE and in 30 - 40% of those with inactive disease. The biopsy will not differentiate between systemic and discoid lupus, but it can rule out other diseases. Tests for other antibodies will rule out or confirm discoid lupus and subacute cutaneous lupus.

Kidney Damage and Lupus Nephritis. Kidney damage in patients already diagnosed with SLE may be detected from the following tests:

Blood tests that measure creatinine, a protein metabolized in muscles and excreted in the urine. High levels suggest kidney damage, although it can also be present with normal creative levels.
Tests for detecting anti-ds DNA antibodies and complement. High levels of anti-ds DNA and low levels of complement C3 suggest kidney damage. (It should be noted, however, that some patients with severe kidney damage show low levels of anti-ds DNA.) Testing for anti-C1q antibodies now appears to be an even more reliable indicator of lupus nephritis.
Urine analysis. Urine analyses should be performed at 4- to 6-month intervals to check for signs of kidney involvement.
A kidney biopsy. This may be performed to determine if lupus nephritis is present when less invasive tests indicate kidney involvement. It is not absolutely accurate but it helps determine treatment. Electron microscopy (very high-powered electronic microscopes) may be especially important in obtaining critical information on the degree of kidney damage.

Lung and Heart Involvement. A chest x-ray may be performed to check lung and heart function. An electrocardiogram and an echocardiogram are administered if heart disease is suspected.

Click the icon to see an image of an electrocardiogram.

Central Nervous System Complications. SLE occurring in the central nervous system (CNS) can be difficult to diagnose because its symptoms are easily confused with other psychiatric and neurologic conditions.

Tests of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for elevated levels of autoantibodies are the most reliable ways to detect CNS complications caused by a faulty immune system.
Additional tests, including electroencephalograms (EEGs), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), or x-rays may be useful when blood vessel blockage in the brain is suspected.
If the doctor suspects that CNS symptoms are caused by infection, especially for patients who are receiving immunosuppressant therapy, a lumbar puncture should be performed.

Osteoporosis. To detect early osteoporosis in patients with SLE whose disease has lasted more than 3.5 years, experts recommend an imaging test called dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to measure bone mineral density.

Treatment

No treatment cures systemic lupus erythematosus, but many therapies can suppress symptoms and relieve discomfort. Treatment of SLE varies depending on the extent and severity of the disease.

Only three drugs are FDA-approved for the treatment of lupus:

Prednisone
Aspirin
Hydroxychloroquine

However, none of these drugs are the current standard of care. In everyday practice, numerous other drugs are commonly used. Researchers are conducting numerous clinical studies and drug investigations. Genetic research in lupus is progressing very rapidly, and hopefully new drugs will be approved in the future. There are also different drugs available to treat some of the conditions associated with lupus.

Less intensive treatments may be effective for symptoms of mild lupus. They include:

Creams and sunblocks for rashes
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for fever, arthritis, and headache
Antimalarial drugs for pleurisy, mild kidney involvement, and inflammation of the tissue surrounding the heart

More aggressive treatment is needed if there is serious disease progression, as evidenced by:

Hemolytic anemia
Low platelet count with an accompanying rash (thrombocytopenia purpura)
Major involvement in the lungs or heart
Significant kidney damage
Acute inflammation of the small blood vessels in the extremities or gastrointestinal tract
Severe central nervous system symptoms

The primary approach to treating severe SLE is to suppress the immune factors, most often first with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressant drugs. Investigational drugs and procedures are also showing promise.

The major complications of the disease must be treated as separate problems, keeping in mind the specific aspects of SLE. They are discussed elsewhere in this report.

Treatment for Cutaneous and Mild SLE

Creams. Steroid creams are often used for skin lesions. However, many patients with discoid lupus do not respond to steroids, particularly if they have eruptions that are caused by sun sensitivity. A cream derived from vitamin A (Tegison) may help some lesions that do not clear up with steroid creams.

Sun Protection. Sun protection is essential. Patients should always use sunblock creams (not just sunscreens) and always wear hats and clothing made of tightly woven fabrics.

Common NSAIDs. NSAIDs block prostaglandins, the substances that dilate blood vessels and cause inflammation and pain. There are dozens of NSAIDs.

Over-the-counter NSAIDs include aspirin, ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil), naproxen (Aleve), ketoprofen (Actron, Orudis KT).
Prescription NSAIDs include ibuprofen (Motrin), naproxen (Naprosyn, Anaprox), diclofenac (Voltaren), tolmetin (Tolectin), ketoprofen (Orudis, Oruvail), dexibuprofen (Seractil).

For people with lupus, NSAIDs may help relieve:

Joint pain and swelling
Muscle pain

Side Effects. Regular, long-term use of NSAIDs can cause ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding, which can lead to anemia. To avoid these problems, it’s best to take NSAIDs with food or immediately after a meal. Long-term use of NSAIDs (with the exception of aspirin) can also increase the risk for heart attack and stroke.

Other NSAID side effects may include:

Upset stomach
Dyspepsia (burning, bloated feeling in pit of stomach)
Drowsiness
Skin bruising
High blood pressure
Fluid retention
Headache
Rash
Reduced kidney function

Patients who have kidney problems associated with lupus (lupus nephritis) should be especially cautious about using NSAIDs. Experts recommend that patients with lupus who take NSAIDs on a regular basis should have their liver and kidney function tested every 3 - 4 months.

An ulcer is a crater-like lesion on the skin or mucous membrane caused by an inflammatory, infectious, or malignant condition. Patients can take certain medicines to suppress the acid in the stomach causing the erosion of the stomach lining. Endoscopic therapy can be used to stop bleeding from the ulcer.

Long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is the second most common cause of ulcers. Ulcers caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are more likely to bleed than those caused by the bacteria Helicobacter pylori.

Those at high risk for bleeding include people over age 60, anyone with a history of ulcers or gastrointestinal bleeding, patients with serious heart conditions, people who abuse alcohol, and those who take medications such as anticoagulants (blood thinners) and corticosteroids.

Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs may help prevent and heal ulcers caused by NSAIDs. PPIs include omeprazole (Prilosec), esomeprazole (Nexium), and lansoprazole (Prevacid).

A doctor may prescribe antimalarial drugs for discoid lupus (skin sores) or mild lupus when skin problems and joint pains are the predominant symptoms:

Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil) is the most common antimalarial drug used for lupus. This drug is effective as maintenance therapy to reduce flares in patients with mild or inactive disease. Hydroxychloroquine may help protect against blood clots in people with antiphospholipid syndrome, high cholesterol levels, and bone loss.
Other antimalarial drugs include chloroquine (Aralen) or quinacrine (Atabrine).

Treatment may start initially with high doses in order to accumulate high levels of the drug in the bloodstream. It is not known exactly why antimalarials work. Some researchers believe they inhibit the immune response, and others think they interfere specifically with inflammation.

A 2006 study suggested that anti-malarial drugs work best in patients who have genetic predispositions to certain types of immune-fighting proteins. The study found that patients who had genetic variations causing abnormally high levels of tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-alpha) and abnormally low levels of interleukin-10 (IL-10) responded best to these drugs.

Side Effects. Side effects of antimalarials may include:

Skin rash
Change in skin color (yellow in the case of quinacrine)
Gastrointestinal problems
Headache
Hair loss
Muscle aches
Eye damage

The most serious is damage to the retina, although this is very uncommon at low doses. Eye damage after taking hydroxychloroquine is reversible when caught in time and treated, but it is not reversible if the damage develops after taking chloroquine. An eye exam is advisable about every 6 months.

Antimalarials may also be used in combination with other anti-SLE drugs, including immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. It should be noted that smoking significantly reduces the effectiveness of antimalarial drugs.

Treatment for Severe SLE

Severe SLE is treated with corticosteroids, also called steroids, which suppress the inflammatory process. Steroids can help relieve many of the complications and symptoms, including anemia and kidney involvement.

Oral prednisone (Deltasone, Orasone) is usually prescribed. Other drugs include methylprednisolone (Medrol, Solumedrol), hydrocortisone, and dexamethasone (Decadron).

Some people need to take oral prednisone for only a short time; others may require it for a long duration. An intravenous administration of methylprednisolone using "pulse" therapy for 3 days is proving useful for flare-ups in the joints. Combinations with other drugs, particularly immunosuppressants, may be beneficial.

Regimens vary widely, depending on the severity and location of the disease. Most patients with SLE can eventually function without prednisone, although some may have to choose between the long-term toxicity of corticosteroids and the complications of active disease.

Side Effects of Long-Term Oral Corticosteroids. Unfortunately, serious and even life-threatening complications have been associated with long-term steroid use. The bone-thinning condition osteoporosis is a common and particularly severe long-term side effect of prolonged steroid use. Medications that can prevent osteoporosis include calcium supplements, parathyroid hormone, alendronate etidronate, risedronate, or hormone replacement therapy in post-menopausal women. Vitamin C and E may help reduce the risk of cataracts.

Other side effects associated with prolonged use of oral steroids include:

Cataracts
Glaucoma
Diabetes
Fluid retention
Susceptibility to infections
Weight gain
High blood pressure
Acne
Excess hair growth
Wasting of the muscles
Menstrual irregularities
Irritability
Insomnia
Psychosis

Withdrawal from Long-Term Use of Oral Corticosteroids. Long-term use of oral steroid medications suppresses secretion of natural steroid hormones by the adrenal glands. After withdrawal from these drugs, this so-called adrenal suppression persists and it can take the body a while (sometimes up to a year) to regain its ability to produce natural steroids again. A few cases of severe adrenal insufficiency have occurred when patients switched from oral to inhaled steroids, which, in rare cases, has resulted in death.

No one should stop taking any steroids without consulting a doctor first, and if steroids are withdrawn, regular follow-up monitoring is necessary. Patients should discuss with their doctors measures for preventing adrenal insufficiency during withdrawal, particularly during stressful times, when the risk increases.

Drugs known as immunosuppressants are often used, either alone or with corticosteroids for very active SLE, particularly when kidney or neurologic involvement or acute blood vessel inflammation is present. These drugs suppress the immune system by damaging cells that grow rapidly, including those that produce antibodies. About a third of patients take immunosuppressants at some point in the course of the disease.

Specific Immunosuppressants. The most common immunosuppressants are:

Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) used to be considered the gold standard of treatment for lupus kidney disease (lupus nephritis). Cyclophosphamide is given intravenously and is sometimes used in combination with corticosteroids or other drugs. It has been used for lupus since the 1970s. Side effects are very severe and include nausea, vomiting, hair loss, infertility, and infections.
Mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept) is now becoming the new standard. Many recent studies have shown that CellCept works better than cyclophosphamide and causes far fewer severe side effects (diarrhea is the main side effect). Unlike cyclophosphamide, it is taken by mouth. Most doctors now recommend CellCept as a first-line treatment for newly diagnosed patients with mild or moderate lupus kidney disease. It may not be appropriate for patients with kidney failure or rapidly progressing kidney disease.
Azathioprine (Imuran) has the lowest toxicity, but is less effective than other immunosuppressants.
Cyclosporine (Sandimmune) has been used for years, mostly for SLE associated with kidney involvement. High blood pressure is common, however, with this drug.

The most frequent side effects of immunosuppressants include:

Stomach and intestinal problems
Skin rash
Mouth sores
Hair loss

Serious side effects of immunosuppressants include:

Low blood cell counts
Anemia
Menstrual irregularity
Early menopause
Ovarian failure
Infertility
Herpes zoster (shingles)
Liver and bladder toxicity
Increased risk of cancer

In general, immunosuppressants should not be used alone unless corticosteroids are ineffective or inappropriate. Grapefruit juice has an enzyme that may enhance the effects of some immunosuppressants.

Monoclonal Antibodies (MAbs). A MAb is a laboratory-made protein that targets specific immune cells, such as B cells. B cell over-activation has been identified as a key component of the lupus disease process. Promising MAbs in development for SLE treatment include:

Epratuzumab is being investigated for treatment of moderate-to-severe lupus. It is currently in Phase III trials.
Belimumab (Lymphostat-B) is also in Phase III trials.
Rituximab (Rituxan), a lymphoma cancer and rheumatoid arthritis drug, has shown good results in early trials in improving lupus symptoms. Researchers think it may affect how T cells and B cells interact. However, in December 2006 the FDA warned of several cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in patients with lupus who took this drug. PML is a life-threatening brain infection. Some patients developed PML as late as 12 months after their last dose of rituximab. Two patients with lupus died from PML.

Intravenous Immunoglobulins. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are sometimes used for patients who have not responded to other SLE treatments. Immunoglobulins are antibodies produced by immune system B-lymphocyte cells. IVIG is a blood product that contains these antibodies.

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is a natural steroid hormone that is produced by the adrenal glands and converted into estrogen and androgen. The synthetic equivalent of DHEA, prasterone (Prestara), is being investigated as a potential treatment for SLE. Several clinical trials have indicated promising, although mixed, results for prasterone’s effect on preventing bone mineral density loss in women who take prednisone. Prasterone is still in the drug development stage and it is not clear when, or if, it will be commercially available.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Some patients with severe lupus have achieved at least short-term remission after undergoing autologous transplantation of stem cells and high-dose drug therapy to suppress the damaging immune factors. Stem cells are the early forms for all blood cells in the body. An autologous transplant is one in which marrow or blood cells used are the patient's own. (The advantage to an autologous transplant is that the patient's own cells are not at risk for rejection by the immune system.)

The procedure first removes the cells from the patient, who then receives high-dose immunotherapy. The stem cells are then reintroduced. Early results of small studies are encouraging, especially for treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome. Evidence suggests that these re-introduced stem cells do not repeat the original autoimmune errors. A 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that autologous stem cell transplantation can help boost the immune system and lead to remission. Patients in the study had severe lupus that was resistant to standard treatments. Results were long-lasting. Researchers calculated that patients had a 50% chance of remaining disease-free after 5 years.

UVA-1 Phototherapy. A promising treatment uses ultraviolet A-1 (UVA-1) radiation, long UVA wave lengths that do not promote sunburn and may actually block inflammatory immune factors. Small studies have suggested that UVA-1 phototherapy may have some benefits for lowering disease activity in SLE.

Plasmapheresis. Plasmapheresis is a process in which the fluid part of the blood, called plasma, is removed from blood cells. The procedure involves first taking blood from the patient. The plasma, which contains the inflammatory antibodies and other immunologically active substances, is discarded and replaced with other fluids. The blood is then returned. Plasmapheresis is not useful for routine management of patients but may have some benefits for patients who do not respond to standard treatments or in specific cases, such as lupus patients with hemolytic anemia.


Infections, Inflammation, or Hypertension in the Lungs	Preventive Measures. Immunizations with inactive viruses and preventive antibiotics should be considered for patients with SLE who are at high risk for infection. Treating Infections. Lung infections need to be treated aggressively with antibiotics. However, antibiotic drugs such as penicillin or the sulfa drugs may cause sensitivity rashes that can be confused with SLE rash. Treating Lung Inflammation. While inflammation of the lung (pneumonitis) resembles pneumonia, it is not an infection but is a result of the autoimmune process. This condition needs to be treated with corticosteroids or immunosuppressants, but only if the doctor is sure infection is not present. Treating Pulmonary Hypertension. Pulmonary hypertension is very serious. Drugs known as prostacylins -- which include epoprostenol, iloprost, and treprostinil -- are standard drugs. Bosentan (Tracleer) is the first oral drug approved for pulmonary hypertension. An inhaled iloprost formulation (Ventavis) was approved in 2004. Sildenafil (Viagra, Revatio) may also be used for this condition. Lung transplantation may be required.
Bleeding and Clotting Disorders	Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Clotting Disorders. Hydroxychloroquine or aspirin may help prevent blood clots in women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). (Aspirin does not appear to be protective in men who carry the autoantibodies responsible for APS.) In patients who have experienced blood clots, treatment with the anticoagulant warfarin (Coumadin) is advisable. This blood-thinning drug may be needed lifelong. Scientists are investigating other treatment options, including autologous stem cell transplantation. The procedure has shown promise in studies for treating lupus-associated APS, but it is still experimental. Excess Bleeding from Thrombocytopenia (Drop in Blood Platelets). Treatments that may be effective for thrombocytopenia include combinations of a corticosteroid and either danazol (a male hormone) or the antimalarial hydroxychloroquine. Immunosuppressants or intravenous immunoglobulin IgG may be helpful in some patients. Surgical removal of the spleen may be advisable if bleeding disorders are a serious problem, but this option should be considered carefully, because the spleen provides one line of defense against infection. (Abnormal spleen function, in any case, appears to be fairly common in SLE.)
Kidney Disease	Drugs. Mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept), a newer drug, can help treat kidney disease associated with SLE and has fewer side effects than other immunosuppressants. It is taken by mouth. Recent studies suggest that it works better than cyclophosphamide. CellCept may be best for patients with mild-to-moderate lupus kidney disease and may not be appropriate for patients with advanced kidney disease. Intravenous cyclophosphamide is the most effective drug at this time for proliferative lupus nephritis, and, in combination with a steroid, has been shown to control advanced kidney disease in 60 - 90% of patients. It has severe side effects, including nausea, vomiting, hair loss, and infertility. Steroids are also useful for treating active kidney disease and for managing milder forms of nephritis. Procedures. Kidney transplant or dialysis should be considered for patients with SLE with severe kidney damage. For unknown reasons, SLE does not generally recur in the transplanted kidneys. Studies are conflicting, however, over whether SLE transplant patients have higher organ-rejection rates than other kidney-transplant recipients. Both transplantation and dialysis have potentially serious complications. Plasmapheresis. It is not clear if plasmapheresis is beneficial for SLE kidney disease.
Osteoporosis	Treatments for osteoporosis include calcium, vitamin D, bisphosphonates, parathyroid hormone, and selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs). [For more information, see In-Depth Report #18: Osteoporosis.]
Heart Disease	The need for aggressive treatment of high blood pressure often accompanies kidney disease. SLE is also accompanied by high cholesterol levels, which requires diet changes and drug therapies. [For more information, see In-Depth Reports #3: Coronary artery disease; #14: High blood pressure; #23: Cholesterol; and #43: Heart healthy diet.]

The spleen is an organ that helps produce and maintain red blood cells. It also aids the body's immune system by producing white blood cells that destroy harmful substances in the body. Removal of the spleen makes a person more susceptible to infection.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing kidney transplant.

Lifestyle Changes

People with SLE should try to maintain a healthy and active lifestyle. Light-to-moderate exercise, interspersed with rest periods, is good for the heart, helps fight depression and fatigue, and can help keep joints flexible.

Patients should minimize their exposure to crowds or people with contagious illnesses. Careful hygiene, including dental hygiene, is also important.

It is very important that patients with SLE avoid excessive exposure to sunlight. Simple preventive measures include avoiding overexposure to ultraviolet rays and wearing protective clothing and sunblocks. There is some concern that allergy shots may cause flare ups in certain cases. Patients who may benefit from them should discuss risks and benefits with an SLE specialist. In general, patients with SLE should use only hypoallergenic cosmetics or hair products.

Chronic stress has profound physical effects and influences the progression of SLE. Getting adequate rest of at least 8 hours and possibly napping during the day may be helpful. Maintaining social relationships and healthy activities may also help prevent the depression and anxiety associated with the disease.

Resources

www.lupus.org -- Lupus Foundation of America
www.lupusny.org -- SLE Foundation of America
www.niams.nih.gov -- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
www.rheumatology.org -- American College of Rheumatology
www.lupusresearchinstitute.org -- Lupus Research Institute

References

Bernatsky S, Ramsey-Goldman R, Isenberg D, Rahman A, Dooley MA, Sibley J, et al. Hodgkin's lymphoma in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 May;46(5):830-2. Epub 2007 Jan 25.

Crosbie D, Black C, McIntyre L, Royle PL, Thomas S. Dehydroepiandrosterone for systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD005114.

D'Cruz DP, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 2007 Feb 17;369(9561):587-96.

Dörner T, Kaufmann J, Wegener WA, Teoh N, Goldenberg DM, Burmester GR. Initial clinical trial of epratuzumab (humanized anti-CD22 antibody) for immunotherapy of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(3):R74. Epub 2006 Apr 21.

Gompel A, Piette JC. Systemic lupus erythematosus and hormone replacement therapy. Menopause Int. 2007 Jun;13(2):65-70.

Harel-Meir M, Sherer Y, Shoenfeld Y. Tobacco smoking and autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007 Dec;3(12):707-15.

Khamashta MA. Systemic lupus erythematosus and pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Aug;20(4):685-94.

Klareskog L, Padyukov L, Alfredsson L. Smoking as a trigger for inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007 Jan;19(1):49-54.

Kocis P. Prasterone. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Nov 15;63(22):2201-10. Lane NE. Therapy Insight: osteoporosis and osteonecrosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006 Oct;2(10):562-9.

Mackillop LH, Germain SJ, Nelson-Piercy C. Systemic lupus erythematosus. BMJ. 2007 Nov 3;335(7626):933-6.

Mease PJ, Ginzler EM, Gluck OS, Schiff M, Goldman A, Greenwald M, et al. Effects of prasterone on bone mineral density in women with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving chronic glucocorticoid therapy. J Rheumatol. 2005 Apr;32(4):616-21.

Sabahi R, Anolik JH. B-cell-targeted therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus. Drugs. 2006;66(15):1933-48.

Sánchez-Guerrero J, González-Pérez M, Durand-Carbajal M, Lara-Reyes P, Jiménez-Santana L, Romero-Díaz J, et al. Menopause hormonal therapy in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Sep;56(9):3070-9.

Vigna-Perez M, Hernández-Castro B, Paredes-Saharopulos O, Portales-Pérez D, Baranda L, Abud-Mendoza C, et al. Clinical and immunological effects of Rituximab in patients with lupus nephritis refractory to conventional therapy: a pilot study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(3):R83. Epub 2006 May 5.

Walsh M, James M, Jayne D, Tonelli M, Manns BJ, Hemmelgarn BR. Mycophenolate mofetil for induction therapy of lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Sep;2(5):968-75. Epub 2007 Aug 8.

Walsh M, Jayne D. Rituximab in the treatment of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitis and systemic lupus erythematosus: past, present and future. Kidney Int. 2007 Sep;72(6):676-82. Epub 2007 Jul 4.

Review Date:
1/21/2008
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Editor-in-Chief, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital. Also reviewed by David Zieve, MD, MHA, Medical Director, A.D.A.M., Inc.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Prostate cancer

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:05 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Prognosis
Risk Factors
Symptoms
Conditions with Similar Sym...
Screening and Diagnosis
Tests to Determine Severity...
Treatment
Treatment Options by Stagin...
Treatment for Localized Pro...
Surgery
Radiation Treatments
Options if Treatments Fail...
Other Treatments
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

New Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer

In 2007, the American Urological Association (AUA) released updated guidelines for treatment of localized prostate cancer. The guidelines recommend that:

Patients should be classified as low, intermediate, or high risk, depending on their PSA levels, cancer stage, and tumor aggressiveness.
Doctors need to consider patients’ personal preferences and quality of life concerns as well as their clinical status.
Standard treatment options include active surveillance (watchful waiting), surgery, or radiation therapy. Initial androgen deprivation therapy (hormone therapy) is seldom recommended for localized prostate cancer.

New Guidelines for Androgen Deprivation Therapy

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2007 guidelines recommend that doctors delay androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer until patients develop symptoms. When treatment is started, ASCO recommends either removal of both testicles (orchiectomy) or luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) drug treatment.
Androgen deprivation therapy can increase the risks for heart disease death and diabetes, according to a 2006 Journal of Clinical Oncology study.

Diagnosis

Experts do not recommend prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests for men over age 70, yet many of these men continue to receive unnecessary tests, indicates a 2006 Journal of the American Medical Association study.
A new investigational test for early prostate cancer antigen-2 (EPCA-2) may be more accurate than the PSA test and may eventually replace it, suggests a 2007 study in Urology.

Genetic Research

Researchers have identified a set of genetic variations that may account for about 68% of prostate cancer cases in African-American men. Scientists hope that further investigation of this chromosomal region may help in developing genetic tests for prostate cancer.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is a malignant tumor that arises in the prostate gland. As with any cancer, if it is advanced or left untreated in early stages, it can eventually spread through the blood and lymph fluid to other organs. Fortunately, prostate cancer tends to be slow growing compared to other cancers. As many as 90% of all prostate cancers remain dormant and clinically unimportant for decades. This high incidence of latent or incidental malignancy is unique to the prostate gland. Most older men eventually develop at least microscopic evidence of prostate cancer, but it often grows so slowly that, as one specialist has written, many men with prostate cancer "die with it, rather than from it."

The prostate gland is an organ that surrounds the urinary urethra in men. It secretes fluid which mixes with sperm to make semen.

Male hormones (androgens) play major roles in the development of prostate cancer. Some research, for example, reports a higher risk with increasing testosterone and a lower risk with increasing estrogen levels. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is the principal male hormone in the prostate gland. It affects the size of the prostate gland itself and may play a role in prostate cancer. Nevertheless, researchers have not yet fully clarified the specific mechanisms that may be important in the development of this disease. Most likely, genetic mutations affecting androgens trigger the process. Certain growth hormones, such as insulin-like growth factor-I, are unrelated to testosterone and may increase the risk for prostate cancer.

Description of the Prostate Gland

The prostate gland is located between the bladder and the rectum and wraps around the urethra (the tube that carries urine through the penis). It is basically composed of three different cell types:

Smooth muscle cells, which contract during sex and squeeze the fluid from the glandular cells into the urethra, where it mixes with sperm and other fluids to make semen
Glandular cells, which produce a milky fluid that liquefies semen
Stromal cells (which form the structure of the prostate)

The central area of the prostate that wraps around the urethra is called the transition zone. The entire prostate gland is surrounded by a dense, fibrous capsule.

Functions of the Prostate Gland

The prostate gland provides the following functions:

The glandular cells produce a milky fluid, and during sex the smooth muscles contract and squeeze this fluid into the urethra. Here, it mixes with sperm and other fluids to make semen.
The prostate gland also contains an enzyme, called 5 alpha-reductase, that converts testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, another male hormone that has a major impact on the prostate.

Changes During the Lifespan

The prostate gland undergoes many changes during the course of a man's life. At birth, the prostate is about the size of a pea. It grows only slightly until puberty, when it begins to enlarge rapidly, attaining normal adult size and shape, about that of a walnut, when a man reaches his early 20s. The gland generally remains stable until about the mid-forties, when, in most men, the prostate begins to enlarge again through a process of cell multiplication.

Click the icon to see an image of the male reproductive anatomy.

Prognosis

Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer in the U.S. Only lung cancer causes more cancer deaths in American men. The lifetime probability of developing prostate cancer is about 16%. Each year, approximately 218,890 men in the United States will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, and about 27,050 will die from the disease. According to the American Cancer Society, 5-year survival rates for all stages of prostate cancer have increased during the past 20 years from 67% to nearly 100%.

A survival rate indicates the percentage of patients who live a specific number of years after the cancer is diagnosed. For prostate cancer, the 10-year survival rate is 93% and the 15-year survival rate is 77%. After 15 years, survival rates stabilize. A 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that men who are diagnosed with low-grade prostate cancers have a minimal risk of dying from prostate cancer up to 20 years after diagnosis. However, men diagnosed with more severe forms of prostate cancer have a higher risk of dying within 10 years.

Treatment of prostate cancer varies depending on the stage of the cancer (i.e., spread) and may include surgical removal, radiation, chemotherapy, hormonal manipulation or a combination of these treatments.

Because so many prostate tumors are low-grade and slow growing, survival rates are excellent when prostate cancer is detected in its early stages. Cure rates can be as high as 98% in some cases.

Click the icon to see an image of the pelvic lymph nodes.

Locally Advanced. If the disease is at the locally-advanced stage, in which it has spread beyond the prostate but only to nearby regions, it is more difficult to cure, but survival rates can be prolonged for years in many men. (When cancer has metastasized to the pelvic lymph nodes, the outlook is worse than if it has spread to other areas.)

Metastasized Cancer. If prostate cancer has spread to distant organs (metastasized), average survival time is 1 - 3 years, but some of these patients may live longer or die of other causes.

If cancer recurs after initial treatment for early-stage tumors, it is still potentially curable if it is contained within the prostate, although in most cases the cancer has spread. Hormone treatments for such recurring cancers can often prolong survival for years, although the cancer almost always returns again.

Risk Factors

The major risk factors for prostate cancer include genetic, dietary, and environmental factors that affect male hormones (androgens) and make a man more susceptible to this cancer.

Prostate cancer occurs almost exclusively in men over age 40 and most often after age 50. It is estimated that by age 70, about 65% of men have at least microscopic evidence of prostate cancers. Fortunately, the cancer is often very slow growing and older men with the cancer nearly always die of something else.

Heredity plays a role in some types of prostate cancers. Men with a family history of the disease have a higher risk of developing prostate cancer. Having one family member with prostate cancer doubles a man's own risk, and having three family members increases risk by 11-fold.

In 1998, scientists discovered a gene, located on chromosome 1, which may be involved in 1 in 500 cases of prostate cancer. They named this gene HPC1. (HPC stands for “hereditary prostate cancer.”) In 2005, scientists announced another major breakthrough in understanding the genetic components of prostate cancer. Research published in Science suggested that, in some cases, prostate cancer occurs when a specific set of genes merge. The genes are part of the ETS gene family and include ETV1, ETV4, and ERG.

In 2007, three separate studies published in Nature Genetics focused on DNA variations located on chromosome 8 in the 8q24 region. The research suggested that men who carry these genetic variations have a substantially increased risk of developing prostate cancer. The DNA variations may be associated with as many as 32% of prostate cancers in Caucasian men and 68% of prostate cancer cases in African-American men.

Doctors hope that future research will help develop genetic tests to identify men most at risk and, eventually, targeted drug therapy for prostate cancer.

A gene is a short segment of DNA which is interpreted by the body as a plan or template for building a specific protein. Genes reside within long strands of DNA which in turn make up the chromosomes.

African-American men have the world's highest risk for prostate cancer, more than 50% higher than the risk for Caucasian males. The disease is also more lethal among African-Americans. Men who live in Asia have lower risks for prostate cancer, but their risk increases if they move to North America. This indicates that there are unknown environmental or dietary factors that can alter a man's underlying genetic risk of developing this disease.

Socioeconomic Issues. The higher mortality rates in African-American men may be partly due to socioeconomic factors, such as lack of insurance, irregular screening and a late diagnosis, and unequal access to health care.

Dietary Factors. Dietary factors may play some small role in the higher risk in African-American men. This is suggested by the fact that prostate cancer is rare in many parts of Africa.

Biologic Factors. Evidence suggests that African-American and Asian men have certain genetic factors that may affect male hormones differently and may help account in part for the higher risk in the first group and the lower risk in the second.

Higher PSA Levels. African-American men also tend to have higher PSA levels than Caucasians. They are overdiagnosed with prostate cancer by 37% compared to 15% in Caucasians using PSA screening tests.

Chemicals. The relationship between prostate cancer and chemical exposure is controversial. Men whose work involves heavy labor and those exposed to certain metals and chemicals, including cadmium, dimethylformamide, and acrylonitrile, may be at higher risk for prostate cancer. Some studies have indicated that farmers might be at higher risk.

A 2001 study concluded that certain leisure activities may expose men to the same chemicals as those that pose a possible danger in the industrial setting. These chemicals included:

Home or furniture maintenance
Painting, stripping, or varnishing furniture
Activities that involved exposure to lubricating oils or greases, metal dust, or pesticides or garden sprays

Scientists think that specific genes that affect the body's response to viruses may be associated with certain types of prostate cancer. Some theories suggest that there may be a relationship between prostate cancer and infections, such as herpes virus, human papillomavirus, and cytomegalovirus. In 2006, scientists identified a new virus, XMRV, which is 30 times more common in men with prostate cancer who have a genetic mutation with the HPC1 gene. Scientists know that men who have the HPC1 genetic mutation are more likely to get prostate cancer. This new research suggests that the genetic mutation may make them more vulnerable to a virus that causes the cancer. Researchers will continue to investigate XMRV and other possible infectious causes of prostate cancer.

Obesity. Obesity may increase the risk for prostate cancer, particularly more aggressive forms of the disease. Obesity may also make prostate cancer more difficult to diagnose. A 2005 study found that overweight and obese men were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer and to die of the disease than normal-weight men.

Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers and Sunlight. Some studies report that patients with prostate cancer and a history of nonmelanoma skin may have a higher risk for a poorer outlook. Such skin cancers are highly associated with exposure to sunlight. However, sunlight triggers production of vitamin D in the body, which research indicates may help protect against prostate cancer. Prostate cancer rates are, in fact, lower in southern, sunny regions.

Vasectomy. Because testosterone levels remain higher for a longer period in men who had vasectomy, experts have theorized that such men have a greater chance for developing the cancer. While some studies have suggested a higher risk with vasectomy, other studies have reported no higher danger. A rigorous 2002 study from New Zealand, for example, which has the highest vasectomy rates in the world, found no increased risk of prostate cancer from the procedure, even 25 years after the operation. A 2002 study in California, in fact, reported a lower risk for prostate cancer in men who had had vasectomies. It is possible that the higher rates reported in earlier studies may have been due to earlier prostate screening in men who have had vasectomies. Indeed, one study reported that about 25% of doctors screened men with vasectomies earlier for prostate cancer than those without the operation. [See In-Depth Report #37: Vasectomy.]

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a vasectomy.

Click the icon to see an animation on vasectomy.

A Western lifestyle is associated with prostate cancer, so obesity, high-meat intake, and dietary fats have been intensively studied. Results have been inconsistent, however. Certain factors, such as cancer-causing compounds in well-cooked meat or high-calorie intake, may help explain the associations between such dietary factors and cancer risk.

Click the icon to see an image on different types of weight gain.

Fats. Some studies have found an association between high fat-intake and prostate cancer. This association may be explained by other suspected dietary factors for prostate cancer, such as high-calorie diet, high meat intake, and calcium (found in dairy products), all of which are associated with fat intake. The effects of specific fatty acids (compounds that make up fats) may also help clarify the role of fats in prostate cancer. The omega-3 fatty acids in fish (EPA and DHA) and the omega-3 fatty acids found in certain vegetables (ALA) can all protect the heart, but they may have different effects on the prostate.

Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acids. Research indicates that docosahexanoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaneoic acid (EPA), the omega-3 fatty acids found in fish, may be protective against prostate cancer. Some studies have reported a lower risk for prostate cancer in men who ate fish frequently (two or more times a week).
Alpha-Linolenic Acid. On the other hand, some research has indicated that alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), the omega-3 fatty acid found in certain plants and nuts (flaxseed, canola, walnuts), may increase the risk of prostate cancer. However, some studies suggest that flaxseed, a plant food that is also rich in omega-3 fatty acids, may help slow the growth of prostate tumors.

Meat and High-Temperature Cooking. Some evidence suggests that a high intake of red meat raises the risk for prostate cancer. Because red meat is high in saturated fat, such findings may explain the inconsistencies found in studies that simply look at fat content as a risk for prostate cancer. High-temperature cooking (grilling, broiling, or pan-frying) of meat or poultry has been specifically associated with increased risk for cancer in some studies. Over-cooking meat increases the amount of compounds called heterocyclic amines, which has been associated with cancerous changes in general and prostate cancer in particular, at least in some studies. Cooking meats in liquid does not appear to increase these compounds. As with all dietary studies, some have observed no association between high intake of well-cooked meat and prostate cancer.

Vegetarian Diet. Small studies suggest that a vegetarian diet may be protective. Specific foods may be especially helpful in reducing the risk of prostate cancer:

Whole grain cereals, seeds, and nuts have been associated with a lower risk for prostate cancer. Part of this protection may be due to their high fiber content. Fiber binds to sex steroids and is excreted, carrying the hormones with it. Whole grains also contain selenium, a trace mineral that may have some protective properties.
Many studies have reported a significantly lower risk for prostate cancer with high intake of cooked tomatoes, which are high in a beneficial plant chemical called lycopene. (However, other studies have not reported such protection.)
Soy may also be protective, which may partially explain the low rate of prostate cancer observed in Japanese men and vegetarians (who typically use soy as a protein replacement). Theoretically soy, which is a rich source of an estrogen-like plant compound, may inhibit hormones that promote prostate cancer. Laboratory studies are mixed on such effects, however.
Cruciferous vegetables (cauliflower and broccoli) may have cancer-fighting chemicals.
Boron-rich foods (nuts, red grapes, avocados, and dried fruits) may also be protective.
Green tea. Scientists have speculated that the antioxidants contained in green tea may help to inhibit prostate cancer growth. Investigators are researching the effects of both green tea and green tea extract supplements, but results to date have been inconclusive.

Dairy Products, Calcium, and Vitamin D. Studies have reported an association between consuming large amounts of dairy products and a modestly increased risk for prostate cancer. (Moderate intake has not been associated with a higher risk.) There is some evidence that calcium (contained in dairy products) may increase the risk for prostate cancer by reducing levels of the most active form of vitamin D (1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D). Many studies indicate that vitamin D may help protect against prostate cancer. Men should make sure they are getting enough vitamin D through sunlight exposure, food, or vitamin supplements.

Getting enough calcium to keep bones from thinning throughout a person's life may be made more difficult if that person has lactose intolerance or another reason, such as a tendency toward kidney stones, for avoiding calcium-rich food sources. Calcium deficiency also affects the heart and circulatory system, as well as the secretion of essential hormones. There are many ways to supplement calcium, including a growing number of fortified foods.

Click the icon to see an image of the benefits of vitamin D.

Click the icon to see an image of the sources of vitamin D.

There is some evidence that certain vitamin and mineral supplements (such as vitamin E and selenium) can protect against prostate cancer, and also some evidence that excessive use of supplements may increase risk. In a 2007 National Institutes of Health study, men who took multivitamin supplements more than seven times a week increased their risks for developing advanced prostate cancer and for dying from the disease. The risks were highest for men who had a family history of prostate cancer and for those who took individual supplements of selenium, beta-carotene, or zinc. However, using multivitamin supplements occasionally or once a day does not appear to increase prostate cancer risk.

The National Cancer Institute is conducting a large-scale clinical trial of more than 35,000 men to investigate whether selenium, vitamin E, or a combination of these two dietary supplements can help to prevent prostate cancer. The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) is the largest prostate cancer prevention trial ever initiated.

Click the icon to see an image of the benefits of vitamin E.

Click the icon to see an image of the sources of vitamin E.

In general, a healthy diet with nutritious fruits and vegetables is the best way to meet your daily requirement of vitamins and minerals.

Alcohol consumption does not appear to be associated with increased prostate cancer risk. A recent study, however, suggested a linear trend between red wine consumption and reduced risk of prostate cancer. In a study of over 1,400 newly diagnosed middle-aged patients with prostate cancer, researchers found that each additional glass of red wine consumed per week reduced the relative risk of prostate cancer by 6%. Researchers theorize that the flavonoids contained in red wine may inhibit tumor cell growth. More research is needed to confirm these results.

Regular physical activity may help reduce the risk of prostate cancer and slow the progression of the disease. The beneficial effects of exercise may be particularly important for older men. A 2006 study found that men ages 65 and older who exercised vigorously for at least 3 hours weekly had a 70% lower risk of being diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer.

Finasteride (Proscar) is a drug used to shrink the prostate in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It blocks an enzyme that converts testosterone to dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), the form of the male hormone that stimulates the prostate. Researchers are investigating whether finasteride may help prevent prostate cancer. In the 2003 Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), more than 18,000 men were randomly assigned to receive either finasteride or placebo. The men took the pills daily for 7 years. Results, published in 2003 in the New England Journal of Medicine, indicated that men who took finasteride were 25% less likely to develop prostate cancer than men who took placebo. However, although the finasteride group had fewer prostate cancers overall, those that did develop were higher-grade and more aggressive. Men who took finasteride had more sexual problems, including episodes of erectile dysfunction, but were less likely to have urinary problems, such as incontinence. It is still unclear if finasteride is an appropriate preventive approach.

Frequent ejaculations from masturbation or sexual activity have been associated with a lower risk for prostate cancer. Some experts speculate that certain carcinogens may be concentrated in prostate fluid, so that frequent ejaculation helps eliminate them. Of note, risky sexual activity, such as with multiple partners, increases the risk for sexually transmitted disease, which in turn may increase the risk for prostate cancer.

There is some evidence that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) offer some protection against prostate cancer. NSAIDs suppress chemicals in the body called COX-2, a protein that may cause prostate cancer cells to spread. Standard NSAIDs include aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil), and naproxen (Aleve). However, NSAIDs taken on a long-term basis can increase the risk for heart and gastrointestinal problems.

Symptoms

Prostate cancer usually causes no symptoms in the early stages. As the malignancy spreads, it may constrict the urethra and cause urinary problems.

Urine flows from the kidney through the ureters into the urinary bladder where it is temporarily stored. As the bladder becomes distended with urine, nerve impulses from the bladder signal the brain that it is full, giving the individual the urge to void. By voluntarily relaxing the sphincter muscle around the urethra, the bladder can be emptied of urine. Urine then flows out through the urethra.

Later-stage urinary symptoms typically include:

Weak urinary stream
Inability to urinate
Blood in the urine
Interruption of urinary stream (stopping and starting)
Frequent urination (especially at night)
Pain or burning during urination

Significant pain in one or more bones may indicate the occurrence of metastases (spread of disease). This chronic pain occurs most often in the spine and sometimes flares in the pelvis, the lower back, the hips, or the bones of the upper legs. It may be accompanied by significant weight loss.

Conditions with Similar Symptoms

In up to half of men in their 40s, the prostate begins to enlarge through a process of cell multiplication called benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The symptoms of BPH can mirror late-stage prostate cancer because the enlarging inner portion of the prostate puts pressure on the urethra, which can potentially cause urinary problems. About 80% of men eventually develop enlarged prostates, but only some experience significant symptoms. BPH is a normal condition and is not life-threatening. [See In-Depth Report #71: Benign prostatic hyperplasia.]

Benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is a non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland, commonly found in men over the age of 50.

Relationship to Prostate Cancer. Because the prostate enlargement in BPH is affected by testosterone, many men are concerned that it may be related to prostate cancer. Fortunately, current evidence indicates that it has no effect one way or the other. The two conditions develop in different parts of the prostate. BPH occurs in the inner zone of the prostate, while cancer tends to develop in the outer area. A 10-year study found no higher risk for prostate cancer in men with BPH.

Click the icon to see an animation about benign prostatic hypertrophy.

Prostatitis is an inflammation of the prostate, often caused by bacterial infections. Symptoms include urgency, frequency, and pain in urination, sometimes accompanied by fever or blood in the urine.

Screening and Diagnosis

The prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test is widely used for screening men for prostate cancer. However, there is great uncertainty over whether regular screening has major benefits for most men. The most recent guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force report that there is no conclusive evidence that routine prostate screening saves lives. Indeed, it may lead to invasive testing, and to treatments for many men who, considering the slow growth of the cancer, might derive no benefits from them. It is a difficult subject, and men must discuss all aspects carefully with their doctor.

A 2006 study in the Archives of Internal Medicine also suggested that screening tests for prostate cancer may not reduce men’s risk of death. The small study of 1,000 men found no differences in survival between men who had prostate specific antigen tests or digital rectal exams, and men who were not screened. Doctors should inform men of the uncertainty of prostate cancer tests so that patients understand the relative risks and benefits of screening

Standard Screening Tests for Early Detection. Two standard tests are used for early detection of prostate cancer:

Digital rectal examination (DRE). With the DRE, a doctor palpates the prostate in order to feel lumps or masses.
PSA test. The PSA blood test measures the level of a protein called prostate-specific antigen. It is able to detect early prostate cancer, although it has limitations.

If the digital rectal examination indicates the possible presence of cancer, regardless of the PSA results, a doctor may also obtain a visual image of the prostate through an ultrasound procedure called transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Only a biopsy, however, in which a tiny sample of prostate tissue is surgically removed, can actually confirm a diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Candidates for Annual Screening. Until major studies report on the survival benefits of prostate screening, expert groups recommend the following:

Men ages 50 - 70 should be offered annual screening. (Some experts believe that men whose PSA levels are under 1.0 and possibly under 2.0 may safely be screened only every 2 years thereafter.)
Men with a family history of prostate cancer and all African-American men should consider annual screening at about age 45.
Experts agree that PSA testing is inappropriate for men over age 70. PSA testing in this age group can cause more harm than good by leading to overly aggressive treatment. Despite this fact, many elderly men continue to receive unnecessary PSA tests.

The best age to start annual screening is under debate. Some experts advocate performing a first PSA test in all men aged 40 and then monitoring anyone whose PSA levels are over 0.60 ng/mL. They argue that such men are at high risk for developing prostate cancer within 25 years. A study presented at the 2007 meeting of the American Urological Association suggested that even a small increase in PSA in men age 44 - 50 may predict whether advanced prostate cancer will develop later in life.

Researchers are working on developing more accurate tests that, hopefully, will one day replace the PSA test. A promising test in development measures a protein called early prostate cancer antigen-2 (EPCA-2). A 2007 study suggested that the EPCA-2 test is highly accurate. It can distinguish between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer and can evaluate whether or not a man has prostate cancer, regardless of what his PSA levels indicate. Researchers hope that this test may eventually provide better diagnoses of prostate cancer, and help prevent men from receiving unnecessary biopsies.


	DRE alone	PSA alone and in Combination with DRE
Chance of Cancer	Only 20% of men with abnormal DREs have cancer. Unfortunately, 70% of prostate cancers detected with DRE alone have already spread beyond the prostate gland.	The odds of cancer with PSA readings are: 3 ng/mL or below indicates 2% or less chance of cancer. 3 - 10 ng/mL indicates about a 25% chance of cancer. 10 ng/mL and over indicates a very strong chance. Men with abnormal results from both DRE plus PSA tests have a 60% chance for cancer.
Risk of Missed Cancers with Normal Results	About 60% of men who have prostate cancer have normal DRE results.	Some evidence suggests that only performing biopsies at levels above 4.0 would miss over 80% of cancers present below that level in men under 60 years and 65% in older men. As a result, some experts recommend biopsies with PSA levels at 3.0 or below in young men. Still, cancer at low PSA levels is very uncommon, particularly in younger men.

About 90% of all prostate cancers arise in the outer part of the prostate where they may be detected by a digital rectal exam (DRE), which is the simplest and most widely-performed screening procedure. The doctor inserts a gloved and lubricated finger into the patient's rectum and feels the prostate for bumps or other abnormalities. The exam is quick and painless but some men find it embarrassing. It is not very accurate in detecting early cancers, but studies indicate that regular DREs still save lives.

Prostate Cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United States. Prostate cancer forms in the prostate gland, and can sometimes be felt on digital rectal examination. This is one of the purposes of the digital rectal exam.

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a protein produced in the prostate gland that keeps semen in liquid form. Prostate cancer cells appear to produce this protein in elevated quantities. Measuring PSA levels increases the chance for detecting the presence of cancer when it is microscopic. There are many unresolved questions surrounding PSA testing. The test is not accurate enough to either completely rule out or confirm the presence of cancer. Relying too much on the test may lead to unnecessary biopsies. Not relying on it enough may miss cancers. It is still unclear if PSA testing is actually saving lives.

Click the icon to see an image of a PSA blood test.

Indications for Biopsy. A biopsy is usually performed to confirm or rule out cancer after screening tests that report:

PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or higher. Some evidence indicates that men with an initial test showing PSA levels above 4.0 should take a second PSA test several weeks afterward before having a biopsy, since many non-malignant factors can increase PSA levels. (Some experts urge biopsies even if PSA levels fall below 4.0 mg, particularly in men under 60, since lower levels do not necessarily rule out cancer.)
Abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE).

Men with abnormal results from both tests have a 60% chance of prostate cancer. The chances for cancer if only one test is abnormal are considerably lower. To further complicate matters, biopsies themselves may miss very small cancers detected by PSA levels alone.

Factors Affecting PSA Levels. A number of factors and noncancerous conditions can influence PSA levels:

Ethnicity. Normal levels in Caucasian males may be different from those for African-American or Asian men. For example, using PSA screening, one study suggested that 15% of Caucasians and 37% of African-Americans are overdiagnosed with prostate cancer based upon PSA results. Some experts believe that there should be different scales for determining risk among these groups, but there is still not enough information to determine a specific range for various ethnic groups.
Age. PSA levels tend to rise naturally with age, so an elevated level in a man who is 70 may be less serious than the same level in a younger man. Some experts believe that men older than 65 who have low PSA levels are at such low risk for prostate cancer that they may be able to forgo further testing.
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Its Treatments. Between 25 - 56% of patients with BPH have elevated PSA levels. Certain treatments for this condition can also elevate PSA.
Prostatitis. About half of men with elevated PSA levels but no signs of cancer on biopsy have signs of prostatitis as indicated by urine and prostate secretion tests. (Prostatitis simply means inflammation in the prostate. Inflammation is usually due to bacterial infection, but it can also be caused by nonbacterial factors.) In one study, screening for prostatitis increased the accuracy of the PSA test significantly and reduced the number of unnecessary biopsies.
Other Noncancerous Conditions. Other noncancerous conditions that can increase PSA levels include surgical procedures or drug treatments for BPH, acute urinary retention, digital rectal examinations, and prostate biopsies themselves.
Ejaculation. Ejaculation within 48 hours before testing can raise PSA levels.

Even with its limitation, the PSA test has increased the number of detectable early-stage and therefore treatable cancers. Because of the slow-growing nature of prostate cancer, however, it is not known whether all of these very early cancers will result in significant or life-threatening disease. It is possible that PSA screening could result in the detection of some possible cancers that would never have bothered the patient and would never have posed a threat to his life.

To improve the accuracy of the PSA tests, particularly when PSA levels have risen to an intermediate range of between 4 - 10 ng/mL, researchers are developing methods for measuring other factors. To date, no test has emerged as clearly superior to the PSA test.

Free PSA Test. A small amount of prostate specific antigen leaks out of the prostate into the bloodstream. There, PSA can circulate without binding to other proteins and is referred to as free PSA. It can also form chemical combinations with other proteins. If cancer is present, PSA is more likely to be bound, and so there is less free PSA in circulation. The free PSA blood test, then, is a ratio of free PSA to the total PSA (free PSA plus chemically bound PSA).

The following results are used to determine if an elevated PSA level could mean cancer:

A free-to-total PSA ratio of 20% or lower, plus total PSA levels of 4 - 10 ng/mL, are suggestive of prostate cancer. (Some experts use 25% as a cut-off, but studies suggest that using this cut-off would miss cancers in many African-American and older men.)
A free-to-total PSA level of more than 20% plus normal or even moderately elevated total PSA tend to indicate the presence of other, benign conditions, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (but it still does not rule out cancer).

Some studies have reported that adding a test for free PSA may improve prostate cancer detection by roughly 40% and may also reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies. In addition, any cancers that the test misses would not develop into significant disease for many years, providing ample opportunity to identify them before they became serious. Not all studies support its advantages, however, compared to measuring total PSA alone, and to date there is no consensus among doctors for how it can be used.

Complexed PSA Test. Complexed PSA (cPSA) is a form of circulating PSA that is bound to a molecule called alpha1-antichymotrypsin. It represents about 90% of the total PSA in men and is significantly higher in men with prostate cancer than in those with BPH. To date, studies have reported conflicting results on its benefits for diagnosing prostate cancer.

Transition Zone PSA Test. Some tests have been developed to measure the density of the PSA in the transition zone of the prostate gland. (The transition zone is the central area of the prostate that wraps around the urethra.) A major comparison study in 2002 reported more accurate results than with complexed PSA.

An ultrasound procedure called transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) provides a visual image of the prostate and is used if the DRE indicates the presence of cancer. Ultrasound is not effective as a diagnostic tool by itself because it cannot differentiate very well between benign inflammations and cancer, but the procedure may help to confirm an uncertain preliminary diagnosis and is useful as a guide for needle biopsies. Ultrasound enhancements, such as Doppler imaging or computer modeling techniques called artificial neural networks (ANN), may increase the accuracy of TRUS.

Initial Biopsies. If preliminary tests raise the suspicion of cancer, doctors will perform a biopsy. Biopsy is used to diagnose prostate cancer, and is a very accurate method for predicting the severity of an existing cancer. However, biopsies can still miss cancers if they are very small.

Core Biopsy. The standard method is called a core biopsy, which uses a spring-loaded biopsy device inserted into the rectum. The device propels a needle into the prostate, obtaining a core of tissue, which is examined by pathologists.
Fine Needle Aspiration. A more recent procedure, called fine needle aspiration, is less painful and may be as accurate as a core biopsy if the sample obtained is sufficient for analysis and if it is analyzed by a skilled pathologist.

More than half of the men who have a biopsy experience discomfort and anxiety, with men under 60 reporting higher levels of discomfort than older men. Taking a sedative 1 - 2 hours before the procedure can help reduce distress. Complications of biopsy are low, but urinary tract infection, fever, or bleeding occurs in 0.1 - 4% of men.

Repeat Biopsies. Because a biopsy can miss very small cancer cells, sometimes three or even more biopsies are recommended if cancer is still suspected after negative results, such as when:

PSA levels are high. Two or more biopsies may be taken if a man has very high PSA levels and still has normal results on a biopsy. Even men with mildly elevated PSA (between 4 - 10 ng/mL) who test negative may be given a repeat biopsy. Cancer will be detected in about 10% of this group. Whether a third biopsy is useful in these men if they still test negative after a second biopsy is uncertain.
DRE results are abnormal.
Ultrasound results are abnormal.
The initial biopsy yields microscopic findings that are suspicious.
The initial biopsy detects precancerous cells known as high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). No treatment is necessary with this finding, but these patients should be rechecked every 3 - 6 months for the next 2 years, and then annually.

Doctors may also perform a lymph node biopsy to see if the cancer has spread.

Tests to Determine Severity of Cancer

Once cancer is diagnosed, PSA levels may help to determine its extent. If PSA levels are less than 20 ng/mL, it is possible that the cancer has not spread to distant sites. PSA levels over 40 ng/mL are a strong indicator that cancer has metastasized (spread throughout the body). PSA levels are also monitored after treatments begin. Changes in the level can show if a treatment is working or if the cancer has come back.

Doctors also monitor how quickly PSA levels rise over time. This rate is called PSA velocity (PSAV). The PSAV is very helpful in determining when treatment should begin and which treatment should be used. A high rate of PSAV is considered to be 2 ng/mL a year. Recent research suggests that men with early-stage prostate cancer who have a slow PSAV are more likely to live longer than men with rapidly rising PSA levels.

A number of biological factors are being used or investigated as markers for cancer or its severity:

Chromosomal Sets. The number of chromosomal sets in the nucleus of the tumor's DNA, known as its ploidy, is an important marker for patients in late stages of prostate cancer. Tumors with the normal two sets of chromosomes, called diploid tumors, usually have a more favorable outcome than tumors that have four sets of chromosomes (tetraploid tumors) or have an abnormal number of individual chromosomes (aneuploid tumors).

Blood Vessel Density. The density of blood vessels in the tumor is an important indicator of outcome. The greater the density, the more likely the tumor is to be aggressive.

Serum Acid Phosphatase. High levels of this enzyme indicate a more aggressive disease and the need for intensive treatments.

Testosterone Levels. Higher total testosterone levels may increase the risk for metastasis. A 2000 study found an association with low free testosterone and more extensive prostate cancer, suggesting free testosterone could be a marker for aggressive disease. (Free testosterone, as with free PSA, is not chemically bound.)

Genetic Markers. Researchers have identified a genetic marker (EZH2), which may prove to be an important marker for aggressive prostate cancer. It may, in fact, prove to be a better predictor of outcome than the tumor grade, stage, or surgical margins. Other genes being studied are those that regulate tumor growth (p53, p27, bcl-2).

Other Markers. Other markers being investigated for predicting cancer progression include prostate-specific membrane antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase, and growth factors.

The ProstaScint is a scanning technique that uses tiny amounts of radioactive material with a monoclonal antibody that can attach specifically to prostate cancer cells. A special camera then can detect tumor cells that cannot be detected with other diagnostic tools. It may help doctors make better treatment decisions. The role of this test in the routine management of prostate cancer is still being defined.

If the biopsy indicates cancer, the doctor will order other tests to determine whether or how far the cancer has spread.

Bone Scans and X-Rays. Bone scans and x-rays may reveal whether the cancer has invaded the bones. To perform a bone scan, doctors inject low doses of a radioactive substance into the patient's vein, which accumulates in bones that have been damaged by cancer. A scanner then reveals how much of the radioactive material has accumulated. Arthritis and infections may also produce positive scans. Patients with PSA levels below 20 ng/mL are unlikely to have scans that show cancer in the bone.

A radiotracer is injected into a peripheral vein. As the radiotracer decays, gamma radiation is emitted and is detected by a Gamma camera. When the tracer has collected in the target organ the area is scanned. Radionuclide scans can detect abnormalities such as fractures, bone infections, arthritis, rickets, and tumors that have spread, among other diseases.

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can further pinpoint the location of cancer that has spread beyond the prostate. Advanced MRI techniques are showing promise for staging and planning treatments.

Click the icon to see an image of a CT scan.

Click the icon to see an image of a MRI.

Bone Metastasis Markers. Researchers are investigating chemical markers, such as amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP), as early indicators of bone metastasis.

Treatment

Because BPH rarely causes serious complications, men usually have a choice between treating it or opting for watchful waiting:

Watchful Waiting. Watchful waiting (also called active surveillance) involves lifestyle changes and an annual examination. Even when choosing watchful waiting, an initial examination is critical to rule out other disorders.
Treatment Options. The primary goals of treatment for BPH are to improve urinary flow and to reduce symptoms. Many options are available. They include drug therapies, minimally invasive procedures, and major surgery.

The choice between watchful waiting and treatment usually depends on a number of factors, such as urine flow rates, prostate size, and PSA levels. Men with BPH who develop symptoms at around age 50 are more likely to need treatment within their lifetimes than older men. Unfortunately, there is no current way to determine who specifically might be at risk for serious problems and need early treatment.

The development of the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) has made the evaluation of symptoms somewhat easier. This scoring service serves as a benchmark for determining severity. The decision to treat or not to treat is typically based on the guidelines described below, but the ultimate choice is often guided primarily by a man's perception of his own symptoms.

Mild, or No, Symptoms. Men with mild, or no, symptoms (IPSS scores of 7 or below) usually choose watchful waiting even if their prostates are enlarged. BPH eventually progresses to the point of needing treatment in about 15% of men with mild symptoms who wait.

Moderate Symptoms. The choice is most difficult for men with moderate symptoms (scores between 8 - 19) and may simply depend on a man's ability to tolerate them. Some studies have reported that up to 40% of men with moderate symptoms eventually seek treatment, and a quarter require surgery. In a small percentage of patients, symptoms improve.

Severe Symptoms. Men with severe symptoms (scores over 20) nearly always choose treatment, although if their prostate glands are small or normal-sized, symptoms may improve.

If a man opts for treatment, there are several choices. Most experts recommend a staged approach as follows:

Mild Symptoms. Medications are the best choice for men with mild symptoms who decide to have their condition treated. There are two standard choices: alpha-blockers and anti-androgens, nearly always finasteride (Proscar). Specific conditions determine the choice, although most men take an alpha-blocker. Men with mild symptoms who choose surgery only experience minor improvement afterward but face the same risks as patients with more severe symptoms.
Moderate-to-Severe Symptoms. Men with moderate-to-severe symptoms often respond to the same medications as men with mild symptoms. (Combinations of alpha-blockers and finasteride are under investigation.) Recent developments in drug therapy have reduced the number of surgical procedures needed and delayed their use. However, a quarter of men with moderate symptoms, and even more men with severe symptoms, eventually need surgery. If a man chooses surgery, there are many choices. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard procedure, but less invasive procedures, particularly those using heat or lasers to destroy prostate tissue, are gaining prominence.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing transurethral resection of the prostate surgery.

The most common reason for choosing surgery is obstruction of the bladder outlet, which causes urinary retention. Surgery is also typically a reasonable option when BPH is clearly related to one or more of the following conditions:

Recurrent urinary tract infection.
Hematuria (blood in the urine). Studies have suggested that when hematuria is left untreated, two-thirds of patients continue to bleed and one third require surgery. The drug finasteride may help some men with this condition and should probably be tried before surgery.
Bladder stones.
Kidney problems.
Some experts believe that surgery might benefit patients for whom an early diagnosis of prostate cancer is important. Unsuspected prostate cancer is detected during surgery in about 15% of cases.

The greatest improvements resulting from surgery are usually increased urinary flow and reduced urine retention. In one study, men who chose surgery reported more worry and depression before the procedure, but afterward they had less depression and anxiety than those who had chosen medication. Often, however, the benefits of surgery are not permanent.

Treatment Options by Staging and Grading

Stages indicate the extent of the cancer:

Stage I and stage II cancer are considered early stage. The cancer is localized and has not spread outside the prostate gland.
Stage III, locally advanced cancer, means that the cancer has spread into the seminal vesicles (glands at the base of the bladder, which are connected to the prostate gland and help produce semen).
Stage IV is advanced cancer. The cancer has spread to the lymph nodes and other tissues or organs.

Experts have devised treatments based on classification systems, including staging and tumor grade. However, there are no clear-cut answers on the best treatments for particular stages. In addition to staging, other factors must be considered. These factors include the patient’s age, overall health status, and personal preferences concerning side effects and quality of life. In addition to standard treatments, patients may also wish to consider enrolling in clinical trials of investigational treatments.

The U.S. National Cancer Institute recommends the following treatment options by cancer stage:

Tumors: T1a, N0, M0, G1, Stage A

Active surveillance
Radical prostatectomy, usually with pelvic lymphadenectomy, with or without radiation therapy after surgery
External beam radiation therapy
Implant radiation therapy (brachytherapy)
Clinical trial options include high-intensity focused ultrasound

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing prostatectomy surgery.

Tumors: T1a - c, N0, M0, any G, Stage A2, B1, or B2

Radical prostatectomy, usually with pelvic lymphadenectomy, with or without radiation therapy after surgery
Active surveillance
External beam radiation therapy with or without hormone therapy
Implant radiation therapy (brachytherapy)
Clinical trial options include radiation therapy with or without hormone therapy; ultrasound-guided cryosurgery; hormone therapy followed by radical prostatectomy

Tumors: T3, N0, M0, any G, Stage C

External beam radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy (hormone therapy)
Androgen deprivation therapy
Radical prostatectomy, usually with pelvic lymphadenectomy, with or without radiation therapy following surgery
Radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to relieve symptoms
Clinical trial options include ultrasound-guided cryosurgery

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing transurethral resection of the prostate.

Tumors: Any T, any N, any M, any G, Stage D1 - D2

Androgen deprivation therapy
External beam radiation therapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy
Radiation therapy or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to relieve symptoms
Active surveillance
Clinical trial options include radical prostatectomy with surgery to remove both testicles (orchiectomy)

Treatment options are dependent on various factors, including prior treatment, site of recurrence, coexistent illnesses, and individual patient considerations.

Patients whose cancer recurs locally after prostatectomy: Radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy.
Patients whose cancer recurs locally after radiation therapy: Androgen deprivation therapy, prostatectomy (very select patients).
Patients whose recurrent cancer has spread: See treatment options for stage IV.

Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer

Choosing the best treatment for localized prostate cancer (T1 or T2) is generally based on the patient's age, the stage and grade of the cancer, overall health status, and the patient's personal preferences for the risks and benefits of each therapy.

Patients have three main options:

Active surveillance, also called watchful waiting, involves monitoring the tumor for cancer progression to determine if and when treatment should be started.
Surgery (radical prostatectomy) removes the prostate gland. The vessels that carry semen and surrounding tissue may also be removed. Studies indicate that compared to watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy may lower the risk of cancer recurrence and death, particularly for younger men with aggressive tumors.
Radiation therapy targets the tumor either externally (external beam radiation) or internally (implanted “seeds”).

In 2007, the American Urological Association (AUA) released guidelines for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The guidelines recommend that patients should be classified as low, intermediate, or high risk. Doctors determine the risk category by using criteria such as PSA tests, tumor aggressiveness, and the clinical stage of the tumor.

Among the AUA’s treatment recommendations:

Compared with active surveillance, radical prostatectomy may lower the risk of cancer recurrence and death.
For men at intermediate and high risk, adding androgen deprivation therapy to external beam radiation may improve survival. A higher dose of external beam radiation also improves the odds for survival.
Initial (first-line) androgen deprivation therapy is seldom recommended for localized prostate cancer except for the relief of symptoms in patients with poor prognoses. Androgen deprivation therapy can increase the risks for diabetes and heart disease.
Patients with localized prostate cancer should have the opportunity to enroll in clinical trials investigating new types of therapy.

Conflicting Data on Survival Rates. To date, neither treatment nor active surveillance has emerged with a definitive survival advantage. Several studies from 2005 and 2006 suggested that treatment provides a survival advantage over watchful waiting for some men with early-stage prostate cancer. A 2005 New England Journal of Medicine study reported that men who had a radical prostatectomy before age 65 had a reduced risk of death from prostate cancer, death from other causes, localized cancer progression, and metastases than men who chose watchful waiting.

Similarly, research presented at the 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium found in a study of nearly 50,000 men with early-stage prostate cancer that men who had radiation or surgical treatment had a 30% lower risk of death than men who were randomly assigned to watchful waiting. However, a 2005 Journal of the American Medical Association study advised against aggressive treatment for localized low-grade prostate cancer. The study found that men with low-grade prostate cancer had a small risk of cancer progression even after 20 years of watchful waiting or hormonal drug therapy

Imperfection of Classification System. The classification systems are not perfect. Even if tumors are rated in low stages and grades and are treated accordingly, undetected cancer cells may escape and spread beyond the prostate. Other factors, such as the man's age and medical condition, must be included in determining whether aggressive treatments or conservative measures are appropriate.

Specialty Bias. Patients should be aware that doctors may be biased to prefer a specific treatment depending on their specialty. For example, in one study the following treatments were favored for patients who were generally appropriate candidates for either surgery, radiation, or watchful waiting:

93% of urologists recommended radical prostatectomy.
72% of radiation oncologists recommended radiation. (And 82% thought that radical prostatectomy was overused.)
Virtually none of the doctors recommended watchful waiting for higher-risk disease. When in doubt, patients should always seek a second opinion to help them make this important choice.

Quality of Life. Surgery and radiation both have potentially distressing side effects, including the possibility of impotence, incontinence, or both. A man must weigh his own emotional responses to the possibility of these side effects versus the possible stress of watchful waiting.

In general, differences in quality of life after surgery or radiation treatment have to do with the specific effects of each type of treatment:

Radiotherapy generally causes more bowel problems than surgery, 30 - 35% versus 6 - 7%, according to a 2001 study. In a 2003 review, the risk for impotence from radiotherapy varied from 25% with brachytherapy to 45% with external beam radiotherapy.
Prostatectomy causes more urinary incontinence (39 - 49% versus 6 - 7% for radiotherapy patients) than radiotherapy. Risks for impotence range from 66% after nerve-sparing prostatectomy to 87% after cryotherapy. In spite of these adverse effects, a 2002 study reported no meaningful differences in well-being or quality of life during a 4-year period for men who chose surgery versus those who chose watchful waiting.
Active surveillance could lead to cancer growth that eventually obstructs the urinary tract (which can happen with the treatments as well). It may also impose an emotional burden on men who live with the possibility of progressive cancer and its difficult treatments. Some who decide to wait become what some doctors refer to as the "walking worried," men who are constantly concerned with their PSA levels. Because aggressive treatment reduces such anxiety, some studies reported that years after surgery, about 75% of men said they would chose it again, in spite of the significant side effects.

Watchful waiting involves lifestyle change and careful monitoring for cancer progression. Over the last several years, watchful waiting has evolved into a strategy called “active surveillance” or “delayed surgical intervention.” With this approach, patients have a digital rectal exam and PSA blood test every 6 - 12 months. If test results indicate cancer progression, then treatment options (surgery, radiation, drugs) are considered. Patients should exercise and eat healthy foods. Patients should report symptoms such as weight loss, pain, urinary problems, fatigue, or impotence to their doctors.

Candidates. Active surveillance may be most appropriate for the following patients:

Men in their late 70s and older. More aggressive therapies (surgery and radiation) are usually recommended for men in their 50s and younger. The choice for men in their 60s and early 70s is more problematic. The general recommendation is that aggressive therapy is suitable for those who have a life expectancy of more than 10 years and who have localized but mid- to high-grade tumors. The tumor grade may be the best guide for determining the risks in choosing watchful waiting.
Elderly men with early-stage (T0 - T2) low-grade tumors.
Men with low-to-moderate (3 - 13 ng/mL) PSA levels.

Some experts think that because prostate cancer grows so slowly, it is likely that older men will die from causes unrelated to the cancer. There is therefore little potential benefit from surgery or radiation, with both posing a risk for impotence and incontinence. However, some recent surveys suggest that more men are choosing treatment (especially surgery) over active surveillance. The choice is a difficult one. It is important that patients find a doctor who can provide them with all the necessary information so that they can make an informed decision.

In men whose cancer is confined to the prostate, surgical resection (radical prostatectomy) offers the potential for cure. Cure rates from initial surgery in men with localized cancer are about 70%, depending on tumor stage, tumor grade, and PSA levels. Research suggests that surgery provides long-term cancer control. Most patients can consider themselves disease-free if their PSA levels remain undetectable 10 years after surgery.

Candidates. Radical prostatectomy is a consideration for men who meet all of the following criteria:

In good health and with a life expectancy of 10 years or more. As average life expectancy in men has increased, more older men are becoming candidates for surgery. Complication rates are higher the older a man is, however.
The cancer has not spread beyond the prostate gland.
The cancer is potentially life threatening. (In general, a life-threatening tumor is indicated by volumes more than 0.2 cc and Gleason grade scores greater than 5.)

The procedure is more likely to cause incontinence (up to 50%) than radiation treatment but has fewer bowel complications. Impotence rates are about the same. Surgery for prostate cancer may be particularly difficult in men who have had transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Radiation therapy (or radiotherapy) is administered as external beam radiation or as brachytherapy (radiation implants). It may be used as the sole primary treatment for localized prostate cancer; 5-year survival rates are similar to those of surgery.

Candidates. Radiation is considered for men with one or more of the following characteristics:

Being older and, particularly, having other medical problems.
Cancer has extended beyond the prostate capsule but has not spread to the lymph nodes or further.
Being a good surgical candidate, but having decided against an operation.

The risk for incontinence (less than 10%) is much lower than with surgery, although bowel problems occur in about a third of patients. Impotence rates are about the same.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Radiation. Hormonal (“androgen deprivation”) drugs combined with radiation therapy may improve survival rates in moderate- or high-risk groups. Patients may need to take these drugs long-term to improve outcomes. Hormonal drugs before radiation (neoadjuvant therapy) may be helpful in shrinking enlarged glands so that brachytherapy (radiation implants) can be used. Hormone therapy can also be given at the same time or following radiation.

An important study published in 2004 in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that for men with localized prostate cancer, a 6-month course of androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiation treatments produced greater survival rates than radiation treatment alone. Standard medical practice has generally indicated that hormone therapy should be given for 3 years; the JAMA study suggests that a shorter regimen may be equally beneficial for some patients and may help reduce the side effects that typically accompany androgen-suppressing drugs.

A 2005 JAMA study suggested that PSA velocity (PSAV) may help doctors decide which patients should receive androgen deprivation drugs along with radiation therapy. PSAV lets doctors calculate how quickly a patient’s PSA level has risen. Researchers found that men who had at least a 2.0 ng/mL increase in PSA levels during the year before their cancer diagnosis had a high risk of dying after external beam radiation therapy, even though they had low-grade prostate cancer. The study suggests that men with this particular PSAV history should consider combining radiation therapy with androgen deprivation drugs.

Surgery

Radical prostatectomy is the surgical removal of the entire prostate gland along with the seminal vesicles (the vessels that carry semen) and surrounding tissue. The incision can be made in one of the following regions:

Retropubicly (through the abdomen and under the pubic bone, exposing the entire surface of the prostate).
Through the perineum (the skin between the scrotum and the anus).

The gland and other structures are then removed. The operation lasts 2 - 4 hours. Advanced surgical techniques, such as minilaparotomy and laparoscopy, are being developed for radical prostatectomy. These techniques use smaller incisions, are less invasive, and may cause fewer complications.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing prostatectomy surgery.

Nerve-Sparing Techniques. Surgical procedures have been refined over the years, and many operations for localized low-grade prostate cancer now spare the nerves that control erection.

A bilateral nerve-sparing procedure saves the nerves on both sides of the sex organs.
A unilateral procedure saves nerves on only one side.

Nerve-sparing techniques can improve quality of life. The ability for sexual intercourse recovers in about a third of patients at 3 years and nearly 60% at 5 years after surgery. (Rates vary depending on certain factors, such as the patient's age -- the younger the better.) In cases where the tumor is bulky and undifferentiated, nerve-sparing techniques may not be appropriate.

Convalescence. Patients remain hospitalized for up to 2 weeks. A temporary catheter used to pass urine is kept in place when the patient is sent home and usually removed about 3 weeks after the operation. The convalescent period at home is about a month. In general, younger patients with early-stage cancers recover fastest and experience the fewest side effects.

Complication rates vary after radical prostatectomy and usually depend on the age of the patient and the experience of the surgeon and medical center. They can range from 4% in men in their 40s to 14% in men over age 70. Complication rates are 10 times higher in patients who have prostatectomy because of cancer recurrence after radiation treatment.

Complications include the usual risks of any surgery, such as blood clots, heart problems, infection, and bleeding. Complications specific to radical prostatectomy, (incontinence, impotence, and contracture of the bladder neck), are discussed below. The mortality rate is very low, about 0.4%.

Quality of life usually improves shortly after surgery, and recovery from certain complications, such as incontinence and sexual function, can continue to occur even over years.

Urinary Incontinence. Urinary incontinence is a common complication and a more distressing side effect of surgery for most men than sexual dysfunction. When the urinary catheter is first removed following surgery, nearly all patients lack control of urinary function and will leak urine for at least a few days and sometimes for months. Major medical centers report that continence returns within about 18 months for nearly all men younger than age 70 and in the great majority of men older than 70. The average time for return of continence in one center was just 1.5 months.

Click the icon to see an image of catheterization.

A number of approaches may help prevent or treat incontinence:

Nerve-sparing techniques can help prevent incontinence, although even in experienced centers, 8% of patients will have some postoperative incontinence, and this rate is much higher (up to 50%) in many community medical centers.
A procedure called endopelvic anterior urethral stitch (EAUS) used with prostatectomy appears to reduce urinary incontinence. In one small study, 75% of selected patients recovered continence in a month. The procedure requires a simple stitch at the front of the urethra.
Kegel exercises, contracting and relaxing the muscles used to shut off the urinary stream, strengthen the muscles on the pelvic floor and are reported to be very beneficial for many men.

If incontinence persists beyond a year, patients may require drug therapy or surgery. Collagen injections into the urethra, bladder neck suspension surgery, or a urinary sphincter implant may be helpful for men who have chronic incontinence. [See In-Depth Report #50: Urinary incontinence.]

Impotence. Studies suggest that about 40% of men have problems with erection after the procedure. In one study, however, more than 70% said they would have the procedure again. Nerve-sparing procedures are proving to be helpful in reducing impotence as well as incontinence.

Sildenafil (Viagra) may help restore potency on average in about a third of patients, but some men may do better than others. In one study, for example, 80% of younger men who were potent before surgery and had bilateral nerve sparing procedures responded to the drug. (Only 40% responded with only unilateral procedure.) Sildenafil is unlikely to be effective for men who had unilateral or no nerve sparing procedures. In those who respond, sildenafil may provide a benefit for years. Sildenafil may take 9 months or longer to become effective. Men who take it may benefit from alprostadil injections started right after surgery to preserve elasticity and help prevent scarring.

Early treatments with alprostadil injections may helpful in restoring erectile function in any case. This treatment maintains blood flow in the penis, and some research suggests that impotence after prostate surgery may be due in part to injury to these blood vessels. In one study, men administered injections every other night for 6 months. They then started taking sildenafil 3 months after surgery. At 6 months, 82% of these men achieved penetration compared to only 52% of men who took Viagra only. The vacuum pump may serve a similar purpose as the injections. [See In-Depth Report #15: Erectile dysfunction.]

Even when erectile function is preserved, men may experience other sexual problems:

Erections may not be as rigid as before the operation.
Orgasm and sexual sensation may be altered.
Patients who retain potency may suffer from retrograde ejaculation, also known as dry ejaculation. During ejaculation, semen travels backward into the bladder, causing infertility.

Fecal Incontinence. Radical prostatectomy can also cause fecal incontinence. The risk may actually be higher in men undergoing nerve-sparing procedures.

Contracture of the Bladder Neck. Another common postsurgical complication is contracture of the bladder neck at the point where it has been stitched to the remainder of the urethra. Contracture usually occurs within the first 3 months after the operation, causing a sharp decrease in urinary stream. The condition can be treated by dilation or surgery on the bladder neck, and rarely recurs.

Pelvic lymphadenectomy is the surgical removal of the pelvic lymph nodes. It is usually performed at the same time as prostatectomy. If the surgeon suspects that cancer has spread beyond the prostate, the surgeon will perform the lymphadenectomy as part of the operation. Some surgeons do this procedure as a matter of course when performing prostatectomy, since it has few complications and adds information on the state of the disease. The lymph nodes are removed through an incision in the lower part of the abdomen, using conventional surgery or laparoscopy, a less invasive variation. The nodes are immediately examined. If they show signs of cancer, metastasis has occurred. In such cases, the operation is usually stopped and the patient is offered radiation or hormone treatments.

Click the icon to see an image of the pelvic lymph nodes.

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) involves removing a section of the prostate with a surgical instrument (resectoscope) that is inserted through the urethra. TURP may be used to control urinary symptoms in men who are not good candidates for curative therapy due to advanced age, health status, or other reasons. TURP is also used as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Cryosurgery is an alternative to standard prostatectomy. The goal of cryosurgery is destruction of the entire prostate gland and possibly surrounding tissue. Steel probes are inserted through the skin between the anus and the rectum and into the prostate. Liquid nitrogen is pumped through the probes to freeze all prostate cells, both healthy and cancerous. For success, cryosurgery requires a uniformly frozen area. The dead cells are absorbed and eliminated by the body. Patients can leave the hospital in 2 - 3 days.

Candidates. Cryosurgery may be considered for patients with:

Early stage local cancer
Cancer that has recurred after radiation treatments
Large primary tumors that the surgeon wishes to reduce
Possibly tumors that have spread beyond the prostate if they have not yet reached the lymph nodes

Strong predictors of treatment failure include:

A history of both hormonal and radiation treatments
Tumor grades 8 and above
PSA levels of more than 10 ng/mL

Complications. Complications are similar to those of standard prostatectomy, but incontinence rates are much lower. Impotence rates, however, are much higher. Nevertheless, 96% of patients report that they are satisfied with the results. Incontinence and other side effects may be higher in patients who have had previous radiation treatments. Other significant complications include scarring and narrowing of the urethra, and fistulas (abnormal passages from internal organs to the skin or between two internal organs).

Radiation Treatments

The two major radiation treatments are:

External beam radiation
Brachytherapy (internal radiation)

Both treatments have generally equal success rates. Research presented at the 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium indicated that the two therapies work equally well for treating localized prostate cancer. In some cases, both techniques may be used in high-risk patients.

In external beam radiation therapy, a doctor focuses a beam of radiation directly on the tumor for 35 3-minute treatments given 5 times a week over 7 weeks. 3-D conformal techniques use computers and a three-dimensional image of the prostate to target the tumor precisely, using high-dose radiation beams. It poses a lower risk for inflammation. Men who have had transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or have a history of lower urinary tract symptoms may be particularly good candidates for 3D conformal techniques.

According to the 2007 American Urological Association guidelines for treatment of localized prostate cancer, patients considering external beam radiation should know that higher radiation doses may reduce the risk for cancer recurrence and improve survival outcome.

Brachytherapy is an outpatient technique that implants radioactive "seeds" directly into the prostate. Implants can be temporary or permanent. Temporary implants are usually accompanied by external beam radiation. This procedure requires more skill than external beam radiation therapy and, even with experienced doctors, the distribution of radioactive seeds is uneven in 15% of cases, increasing the risk for insufficient doses.

Computerized systems are being developed to help oncologists optimize seed placement and allow precise treatment for each patient and higher radiation doses. Eventually, it could improve tumor control, reduce side effects, and cut costs.

It is common for PSA levels to temporarily rise, or "bounce," following seed implantation without it being a signal for cancer recurrence. This effect can produce anxiety and can interfere with the diagnosis of true recurrence.

Candidates. Studies suggest that brachytherapy is useful for select patients, specifically those with prostate volumes less than 60 mL and who have early-stage prostate cancer (T1 or T2 tumors, a Gleason grade lower than 7, and PSA levels below 10 ng/mL). It may be beneficial in patients with inflammatory bowel disease or with cancer close to the bowel. Poorer candidates for brachytherapy include men who have had TURP and patients with advanced cancer, high-grade tumors, or very enlarged prostate glands.

The side effects of radiation therapy include most of those of surgery, but the risks for impotence and incontinence are considerably lower. A 2000 study concluded that adjuvant radiation therapy (given right after surgery) in moderate doses does not increase the risk for long-term urinary incontinence or sexual dysfunction beyond that of surgery alone.

Gastrointestinal Complications. Complications in the gastrointestinal are common. Short-term effects include nausea and loss of appetite. Diarrhea is a very common side effect and can last for the duration of therapy. It is usually treated with Lomotil. A few patients have diarrhea flare-ups for years afterwards. Less than 1% suffer more serious intestinal problems.

There is potential for injury to the rectum with brachytherapy. Ulcers in the rectum occur in more than 10% of patients, but the risk decreases with greater experience in the technique.

Urinary Problems. The risk for incontinence is about 7 - 20%. Patients treated with radiation may experience a painful, but usually temporary, urinary tract inflammation. About 10 - 15% of patients develop a long-term urgent and frequent need to void their bladder. Brachytherapy carries a lower risk for urinary incontinence.

Scarring and narrowing of the urinary tract (stricture) may occur, particularly in men who had TURP performed within a short time before radiation treatment. In such men, radiation treatments should be delayed by 4 - 6 weeks. If the prostate has been injured or damaged or the bladder is easily irritated, side effects with brachytherapy may actually be worse than with other procedures.

Impotence. In a 2003 review, the risk for impotence following radiotherapy varied from 25% with brachytherapy to 45% with external beam radiotherapy. Still, very few studies on brachytherapy have lasted more than 2 years, so more research is needed.

Sildenafil (Viagra) may help many men experiencing impotence following radiation therapy for local prostate cancer. Early use of both alprostadil injections and sildenafil may be even more effective. Other treatments may also be useful. [See In-Depth Report #15: Erectile dysfunction.]

Investigators are testing radiation treatments that use a combination of neutrons and protons (mixed-beam) or proton beams rather than the standard proton radiation therapy. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is a promising technique that delivers different doses to multiple target areas using images of specific regions.

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). Studies are reporting promising results with an intensive ultrasound procedure called transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). It allows for very precise minimally invasive removal of tissue in local prostate cancers. It may eventually prove to be an alternative to radiation therapy. More research, with long-term follow up, is needed.

Radiofrequency. Radiofrequency is being used to heat and destroy the prostate. Early studies suggest that this is a promising approach.

Options if Treatments Fail

Rising PSA Levels. If prostate cancer has been eliminated, PSA levels should drop to 0.5 ng/mL or less after treatment. A sudden rise or persistently elevated PSA levels after treatment are often indications that prostate cancer persists:

If PSA levels are above 2.0 ng/mL, then cancer is most likely still present.
If PSA levels are between 0.5 - 2.0 ng/mL, the situation is less clear. One study indicated that measuring free PSA may help determine the status of the cancer in such patients. An average free PSA of 27% indicated that cancer had been eliminated, while an average of 15% meant that cancer was still present.

Note: It is common for PSA levels to temporarily rise following radiation seed implantation without signaling cancer recurrence.

Rising PSA levels do not necessarily mean that the cancer has spread or even that the cancer will recur during a man's lifetime. An actual cure is still possible if the cancer is localized within the prostate. In one study, 64% of patients with rising PSA levels after surgery still had cancer confined to the prostate. Indications of a poorer outlook in this study included:

Cancer penetration of the prostate capsule
Positive surgical margins (microscopic evidence of cancer cells at the very edge of the resected specimen)
Invasion of nearby vessels or lymph nodes

Still, among the men in the study, after 7 years only 3% of patients had died of prostate cancer. After 15 years, only 19% had evidence of recurrence. Other markers for persistent cancer are under investigation. For example blood tests that show low levels of acid phosphatase (ACP) before treatments may predict a higher chance for recurrence-free survival.

Treatment for recurring cancer is not always clear-cut. If the cancer recurs locally, cure may still be possible:

Surgery and androgen deprivation therapy may be considered for patients who were first treated with radiation.
For patients who were initially treated with surgery, radiation or androgen deprivation therapy are both options.

If the disease has already spread or if the doctor suspects that it may have spread, the patient is typically given androgen deprivation therapy. Chemotherapy drugs in combination with hormonal drugs are being investigated for patients who fail surgery or radiation.

A 2005 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggested three factors that may help doctors and patients decide if additional treatment is needed if cancer recurs after surgery:

How quickly PSA levels double after surgery (shorter time equals higher risk)
How quickly the cancer recurred after surgery (shorter time equals higher risk)
Gleason score (higher score suggests more aggressive tumors and greater risk)

Patients at high risk are more likely to die from the recurrent cancer and should be considered for additional treatments. Patients at low risk face a lower likelihood of death from prostate cancer and probably do not require more treatment. The study found that for patients at low risk, the time to death after cancer recurrence was very long, generally lasting more than 16 years.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Androgen deprivation therapy, also called androgen suppression therapy or hormone therapy, involves blocking the effect of male hormones such as testosterone through medical (drugs) or surgical castration. Androgen suppression therapy is not recommended as a first-line approach for most men with localized prostate cancer. It is usually given to patients with recurrent, progressive, or advanced prostate cancer. It may also be given for a relatively brief time in combination with external beam radiation.

Although androgen deprivation therapy slows the growth of most prostate cancers, it can have serious side effects. The American Society of Oncology’s (ASCO) 2007 guidelines do not recommend the early use of hormone therapy. However, ASCO does recommend that patients start therapy once they begin to experience cancer symptoms. Patients who defer therapy should have regular doctor visits every 3 - 6 months to monitor their condition.

Salvage Prostatectomy. Salvage prostatectomy is sometimes performed after unsuccessful radiation treatment if the cancer is still local. The odds of the procedure's success are only 10 - 64%. Many experts recommend against salvage prostatectomy in most cases of radiation failure. Severe complication rates for salvage prostatectomy are very high: 10 times that of men who have not had radiation. For example, incontinence after salvage prostatectomy is often untreatable with medications, collagen implants, or other standard treatment measures.

Salvage Cryosurgery. Salvage cryosurgery may be effective in certain patients who fail external beam radiotherapy. The best candidates are those with Stage II cancer or less and PSA levels below 10 ng/mL.

Adjuvant and Salvage Radiation. Radiation is proving to help patients who still show detectable levels of PSA after surgery (generally 2 ng/mL or less). It may even be useful years after surgery if PSA levels rise. Depending on timing, radiation after treatment failure is referred to as either:

Adjuvant radiation is radiation therapy performed within 6 months after radical prostatectomy. One area of controversy is whether to use adjuvant radiation after surgery on patients whose PSA levels are very low or undetectable but who have other test results that indicate the cancer is likely to spread. Patients with adverse findings and low PSA have to weigh the potential complications of radiation therapy against the odds of recurrence without it, which are about 20 - 30%. A small 2006 study found that adjuvant radiation worked much better than salvage radiation for men with advanced (stage III or IV) local prostate cancer. However, a 2007 study indicated that adjuvant radiation in men with advanced cancer may reduce the risk of cancer recurrence but does not improve length of survival.
Salvage radiation is radiation therapy more than 6 months after surgery. A 2004 study suggested that salvage radiation could be more beneficial than previously thought, even for men with aggressive prostate cancer. Researchers studied 501 men who had undergone radical prostatectomy (surgical removal of the prostate gland) and subsequently received radiation treatment for recurrent cancer (as indicated by rising PSA levels). Men with lower Gleason scores and lower PSA levels benefited the most from salvage radiation. However, even men with higher-grade cancers were able to delay metastatic cancer progression as long as they received radiation at an early stage while their PSA levels were relatively low (less than 2.0 ng/mL).

Other Treatments

Male hormones (called androgens), particularly testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, determine male secondary sex characteristics and stimulate prostate cell growth. When prostate cells, both healthy and cancerous, are deprived of androgens, they no longer proliferate and eventually die.

Androgen deprivation therapy (also called androgen suppression therapy or hormone therapy) uses drugs or surgery (orchiectomy) to suppress or block male hormones (androgen) -- particularly testosterone and dihydrotestosterone -- that stimulate the growth of prostate cells. Androgen deprivation therapy is used for advanced and metastatic cancer and may be used if treatment for localized prostate cancer has failed and cancer recurs (as indicated by rising PSA levels). Side effects can include decreased bone density, decreased muscle mass, hot flashes, depression, fatigue, weight gain, enlarged breasts, and high cholesterol levels. Evidence also indicates that androgen deprivation therapy increases the risk for diabetes and death from heart disease.

There has been some debate about when androgen deprivation therapy should be initiated. In 2007, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published clinical guidelines for androgen deprivation therapy in patients with recurrent, progressive, or advanced prostate cancer. The guidelines recommend that hormone therapy should, in general, be delayed until patients begin to experience symptoms from their cancer. However, when therapy is deferred, patients should regularly visit their doctors every 3 - 6 months for careful monitoring of their condition.

ASCO recommends either removal of both testicles (bilateral orchiectomy) or injections with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) as initial androgen deprivation treatments. Combining nonsteroidal antiandrogen drug therapy with orchiectomy or LHRH may also be considered.

Doctors vary widely on their opinions of androgen deprivation therapy. A 2006 study found that the decision to use hormonal therapy depends more on a patient’s urologist than on the patient’s tumor or other factors.

Androgen deprivation therapy includes:

Hormonal Drugs. The primary drugs used for suppressing androgens are called luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists.

Orchiectomy. Orchiectomy is the surgical removal of the testicles. It is the single most effective method of reducing androgen hormones, but it is considered an extreme procedure. Studies do not indicate that it significantly improves survival rates. Orchiectomy plus radical prostatectomy may delay progression in patients with cancers that have spread only to the pelvic lymph nodes. Combining orchiectomy with antiandrogen drug therapy adds a modest benefit.

The median survival rate after the operation is about 55% over a 40-month period. An estimated 25% of patients survive 5 years or more. Nevertheless, orchiectomy, although irreversible, may produce fewer adverse effects than hormonal drugs, and interestingly, many patients report significantly higher quality of life after orchiectomy than those who opt for hormonal treatment, particularly total androgen ablation. Because orchiectomy is irreversible, about 75% of patients with advanced prostate cancer choose hormonal therapy to block androgens. Like all androgen deprivation therapies, orchiectomy increases the risk for osteoporosis.

Many men can still achieve erection after orchiectomy, but there is almost always a decline in sexual drive. Men who cannot achieve erection may be candidates for a penile implant. Patients do not experience a reversal of sex characteristics; the voice does not change and body hair is not affected.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy Before or With Radiation. Hormonal drugs combined with radiation therapy may improve survival rates in moderate- or high-risk groups. Patients may need to take these drugs long-term to improve outcomes. Hormonal drugs before radiation (neoadjuvant therapy) may be helpful in shrinking enlarged glands so that brachytherapy (radiation implants) can be used.

An important study published in 2004 in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that for men with localized prostate cancer, a 6-month course of hormone therapy combined with radiation treatments produced greater survival rates than radiation treatment alone. Standard medical practice has generally indicated that hormone therapy should be administered for 3 years; the JAMA study suggests that a shorter regimen may be equally beneficial for some patients and may help reduce the side effects that typically accompany androgen-suppressing drugs.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy Before or After Surgery. Some studies suggest benefits from using hormone therapy before surgery (neoadjuvant therapy) to reduce the tumor size, although it is not clear yet if this approach has survival benefits. Hormonal treatment may be useful after surgery in men who have high-grade tumors or tumors that have invaded the semen-carrying vessels or lymph nodes. Such men have a risk for failure after surgery of 50 - 80%.

The primary drugs used for suppressing androgens are called luteinizing hormone-releasing hormones (LHRH) agonists. They include:

Leuprolide (Lupron, Leuprogel). Studies report that disease progression is prevented in 72% of men taking daily leuprolide and up to 89% of those taking monthly injections. Certain men, however, may not respond to injections. Drug delivery using implants is under investigation.
Goserelin (Zoladex). Partial responses of 60 - 80% have been reported. A controlled release formulation has been developed that increases the time between injections from 4 weeks to 3 months.
Buserelin.

LHRH drugs block the pituitary gland from producing hormones that stimulate testosterone production. Patients must have injections of LHRH agonists for the rest of their lives.

Testosterone and PSA Surges. Treatment with LHRH agonists produces a testosterone surge in the first week, which may actually intensify symptoms. After this phase, testosterone levels drop to near zero. Leuprogel, a newer leuprolide, may pose a lower risk for this effect. Researchers are investigating other drugs, such as GnRH antagonists, that do not produce this surge.

LH-RH agonists can also cause PSA levels to rise temporarily. Administering flutamide, a drug known as an antiandrogen, for 2 weeks prior to LH-RH agonists may not only prevent PSA surge but also induce early declines in PSA levels.

Side Effects. Side effects include hot flashes and occasionally nipple and breast tenderness.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulates the pituitary gland to release luteinizing hormone-releasing hormones (LHRH). GnRH antagonist drugs such as abarelix (Plenais) and histrelin (Vanta) block this action. They have two advantages over LHRH agonists:

They do not cause the same testosterone surge that can temporarily worsen cancer symptoms.
They seem to reduce testosterone levels more quickly.

Anti-androgens are drugs used to block the effects of testosterone. They are used alone or in maximal androgen blockage (MAB), in which they are combined with LHRH agonists or orchiectomy to completely block androgen hormones. Anti-androgens are either steroidal or nonsteroidal.

Nonsteroidal Anti-androgens. Nonsteroidal anti-androgen drugs include:

Flutamide (Eulexin, Drogenil). Flutamide has produced extended response in some patients. Side effects may include diarrhea and liver damage, which has been fatal in rare cases; liver function must be monitored closely.
Nilutamide (Nilandron). Nilutamide is associated with reversible interstitial pneumonitis, nausea, alcohol intolerance, and visual disturbances.
Bicalutamide (Casodex). Bicalutamide is effective and appears to have fewer severe side effects than other anti-androgens, including loss of sexual interest, osteoporosis, visual disturbance, and interstitial pneumonia. This drug is proving to have survival rates equal to those of maximal androgen blockage.

Steroidal Antiandrogens. Steroidal antiandrogens act like female hormones and include:

Megestrol uppresses androgen production, but incompletely, and is generally not used as initial therapy.
Cyproterone combined with estrogen may prevent the testosterone surge that occurs with LH-RH agonists.

Men often experience fatigue, loss of energy, and emotional distress from androgen suppression treatment. Hormonal therapy may significantly impair quality of life, particularly in men who had no symptoms beforehand and whose cancer has not metastasized. Common side effects of androgen suppression drugs include:

Osteoporosis, the loss of bone density. This risk is higher with orchiectomy than with androgen suppressants. Some androgen suppressants, such as bicalutamide, may cause less bone loss. The use of estrogens may actually be bone protective. A number of medications, especially bisphosphonates, are available to help prevent or reduce bone loss.
Diarrhea
Loss of muscle mass
Psychological disturbances
Fatigue
Loss of sexual drive and sexual dysfunction
Swelling of the breasts (gynecomastia)
Nausea and vomiting
Hair loss
Anemia

In addition, there is growing evidence that androgen deprivation therapy increases the risks for diabetes and heart disease.

Prostate cancer that does not respond to hormonal treatment is called hormone-resistant, or hormone-refractory, cancer. There are various drug treatments for hormone-resistant cancer:

Docetaxel and Other Chemotherapy. Chemotherapy drugs for prostate cancer include docetaxel (Taxotere), mitoxantrone (Novantrone), estramustine (Emcyt), and various platinum-based drugs, such as carboplatin. These drugs are often combined with other cancer drugs (such as 5-fluorouacil) or corticosteroids (such as prednisone).

Docetaxel-based drug regimens are emerging as the main chemotherapy treatment for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. In 2004, the FDA approved docetaxel injection in combination with prednisone for treatment of patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer. Patients who received this drug combination survived on average 2.5 months longer than patients who received mitoxantrone and prednisone. Another 2004 clinical trial found that a docetaxel and estramustine combination worked better than mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced resistant prostate cancer. Side effects can be serious and may include gastrointestinal problems (nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), fatigue, low blood cell counts, and increased risk for blood clots.

Researchers are continuing to investigate docetaxel combinations and compare them to other chemotherapy regimens. A large 2006 study reported that docetaxel and prednisone worked better than mitoxantrone plus prednisone in improving quality of life, pain relief, and survival. Docetaxel is also being investigated in combination with vitamin D-related drugs. A 2006 trial found that men with advanced prostate cancer who took docetaxel plus high-dose vitamin D (calcitriol) lived about 8 months longer than men who received docetaxel and placebo. Calcitriol also appeared to protect against docetaxel’s side effects, especially gastrointestinal problems and blood clots.

Doctors are also studying other ways to help patients cope with docetaxel’s side effects. Research presented at the 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium suggested that patients may be able to take periodic breaks from docetaxel treatment instead of having continuous therapy. In the study, patients with advanced prostate cancer were given the option of suspending docetaxel treatment if their PSA levels improved within a certain range. Researchers found that patients were able to take 16-week breaks and still show improvement once they resumed treatment. This approach may work best for patients who experienced a good initial response to docetaxel.

Bisphosphonates. These drugs prevent bone loss and reduce bone pain in metastasized cancers. They are of particular interest because they may inhibit prostate cancer cell growth in the bone. The bisphosphonates showing most promise in prostate cancer are newer drugs called nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (pamidronate, zoledronic acid).

Immunotherapies. The prostate organ offers special possibilities for genetic therapies because it contains highly specific antigens (factors that the immune system can target). There are a number of approaches currently under investigation, including:

Genetically designed vaccines (Provenge, Gvaz, JBT 1001) inject factors into prostate cancer cells that trick the immune system into attacking the cancer cells.
Antisense therapy for prostate cancer blocks expression of a protein called BCL-2, which tends to be genetically overexpressed in some patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. This protein prevents apoptosis (a natural process by which all cells, including cancer cells, self-destruct).
Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are genetically designed immune factors that target foreign compounds called antigens for attack by the immune system. Monoclonal antibodies are being designed to target prostate-specific antigens.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors. Much research is focusing on drugs that block small molecules involved with the growth of blood vessels that feed the tumor (a process called angiogenesis ). The spread of new blood vessels is controlled by compounds called growth factors, which may be important in cancer cell proliferation. Researchers are interested in drugs that turn off these growth factors or their receptors, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In doing so, the drugs may be able to cut off cancer's life blood. Gefitinib (Iressa) and erlotinib (Tarceva) are angiogenesis inhibitors that target receptors of epidermal growth factors called tyrosine kinase. They are being used in lung cancer and are being investigated in a number of other cancers, include prostate cancer. Various drugs that inhibit angiogenesis in other ways (thalidomide, endostatin) are also under investigation.

Ketoconazole. Ketoconazole is an antifungal drug that blocks an enzyme that stimulates production of testosterone. It is effective in high doses but can have severe gastrointestinal effects, mainly nausea and anorexia. Long-term use can result in impotence, itchy skin, nail changes, and suppression of stress hormones. One center reported a consistent PSA response in more than 60% of patients who had failed other androgen deprivation treatments.

Aromatase Blockers. Aminoglutethimide (Cytadren) and similar drugs block aromatase, an enzyme important in estrogen production. Because the female hormone estrogen plays such a major role in the development of breast cancer, some experts think that blocking the small amount of estrogen found in men may also affect prostate cancer. Side effects include drowsiness and skin rash.

Atrasentan. Atrasentan is known as an ET(A)-receptor antagonist. It is showing promise in reducing bone loss and delaying progression of prostate cancer in men with advanced disease that no longer responds to hormone therapy. Side effects are relatively mild.

Resources

www.cancer.gov -- National Cancer Institute
www.cancer.org -- American Cancer Society
www.asco.org -- American Society of Clinical Oncology
www.plwc.org -- People Living with Cancer
www.prostatecancerfoundation.org -- Prostate Cancer Foundation
www.fightprostatecancer.org -- National Prostate Cancer Coalition
www.urologyhealth.org -- Urology Health
www.nccn.org -- National Comprehensive Cancer Network
www.cdc.gov/cancer/prostate -- CDC Cancer Prevention and Control
www.psa-rising.com -- PSA Rising: Prostate Cancer Survivor Info
www.ustoo.org -- Us Too! Prostate Cancer Education and Support
www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials -- Find clinical trials

References

Greenspan SL, Nelson JB, Trump DL, Resnick NM. Effect of once-weekly oral alendronate on bone loss in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 20;146(6):416-24.

Gudmundsson J, Sulem P, Manolescu A, Amundadottir LT, Gudbjartsson D, Helgason A, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a second prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24. Nat Genet. 2007 May;39(5):631-7. Epub 2007 Apr 1.

Haiman CA, Patterson N, Freedman ML, Myers SR, Pike MC, Waliszewska A, et al. Multiple regions within 8q24 independently affect risk for prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2007 May;39(5):638-44. Epub 2007 Apr 1.

Keating NL, O'Malley AJ, Smith MR. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 20;24(27):4448-56.

Lawson KA, Wright ME, Subar A, Mouw T, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A, et al. Multivitamin use and risk of prostate cancer in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 May 16;99(10):754-64.

Leman ES, Cannon GW, Trock BJ, Sokoll LJ, Chan DW, Mangold L, et al. EPCA-2: a highly specific serum marker for prostate cancer. Urology. 2007 Apr;69(4):714-20.

Loblaw DA, Virgo KS, Nam R, Somerfield MR, Ben-Josef E, Mendelson DS, et al. Initial hormonal management of androgen-sensitive metastatic, recurrent, or progressive prostate cancer: 2006 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 20;25(12):1596-605. Epub 2007 Apr 2.

Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007update. J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2106-31.

Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2329-35.

Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K, Konety BR. PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2336-42.

Yeager M, Orr N, Hayes RB, Jacobs KB, Kraft P, Wacholder S, et al. Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24. Nat Genet. 2007 May;39(5):645-9. Epub 2007 Apr 1.

Review Date:
6/27/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Colon and rectal cancers

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:05 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Causes
Symptoms
Risk Factors
Dietary Factors
Prevention
Diagnosis
Staging
Prognosis
Surgery
Medications
Radiation Treatment
Follow-up Testing
Treatment for Metastasized ...
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Drug Approval

In September 2006, the Food and Drug Administration approved panitumumab (Vectibix) for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body following chemotherapy. Like cetuximab (Ertibux), panitumumab targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on cancer cells. Panitumumab is the first new colorectal cancer drug approved since 2004. The FDA granted accelerated approval to panitumumab based on a clinical trial of patients with metastatic cancer. The average time to disease progression or death was 96 days in patients treated with panitumumab compared to 60 days in patients who received standard care.

Diet and Colorectal Cancer Recurrence

Evidence indicates that diet plays a role in colorectal cancer prevention. Now, a 2007 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) suggests that dietary factors also affect the risk of cancer recurrence. Patients with stage III colorectal cancer who ate lots of red meat, refined grains, and sweets had a higher risk of cancer recurrence and death than patients whose diets were high in fruits and vegetables, poultry, and fish.

Folic Acid No Good for Prevention?

Many experts have long believed that folic acid supplements may help protect against colorectal cancer. But according to a 2007 JAMA study, high-dose folic acid supplements may not prevent colorectal cancer and may actually increase the risk for adenomatous polyp formation. Adenomatous polyps are benign colorectal tumors that can potentially become cancerous. In the study, patients who took folic acid supplements had a greater risk of developing new, more numerous, and larger adenomatous polyps than patients who did not take the supplements.

NSAIDS Not Recommended for Colorectal Cancer Prevention

In March 2007, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against the routine use of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to prevent colorectal cancer in people who are at average risk for this disease. Several recent studies have indicated that aspirin, and NSAIDs such as celecoxib (Celebrex), can help prevent colorectal cancer. But the USPSTF notes that the risks of these drugs outweigh the benefits. Long-term daily use of NSAIDs increases the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding, kidney function problems, and heart attack and stroke.

Introduction

Cancers of the colon and rectum, often referred to collectively as colorectal cancer, are life-threatening tumors that develop in the large intestine.

More than 80% of colorectal tumors evolve from adenomatous polyps. These gland-like growths develop on the mucous membrane that lines the large intestine. They are usually either:

Tubular polyps, which protrude mushroom-like
Villous adenomas, which are flat and spreading and are more apt to become malignant (cancerous)

Polyps are very common and almost always benign. Their numbers increase with age. Polyps are found in about 25% of people by age 50, and 50% of people by age 75. Fewer than 1% of polyps under 1 centimeter (slightly less than half an inch) become cancerous. About 10% of larger polyps become cancerous within 10 years, and about 25% of these larger polyps become cancerous after 20 years. Certain inherited polyps can become cancerous more rapidly.

Digestion takes place in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, essentially a long tube that extends from the mouth to the anus. It is a complex organ system that first carries food from the mouth down the esophagus to the stomach. Food then travels through the small and large intestines before being excreted through the rectum and out the anus.

The esophagus, stomach, large and small intestine -- aided by the liver, gallbladder, and pancreas -- convert the nutritive components of food into energy and break down the non-nutritive components into waste to be excreted.

The esophagus is a narrow muscular tube, about 9 1/2 inches long that begins below the tongue and ends at the stomach.

In the stomach, acids and stomach motion break food down into particles small enough so that the small intestine can absorb nutrients.

Click the icon to see an image of stomach anatomy.

The small intestine, despite its name, is the longest part of the gastrointestinal tract, extending for about 20 feet. Food passes from the stomach through its three parts: first the duodenum, then the jejunum, and finally the ileum. Most of the digestive process occurs in the small intestine.

Click the icon to see an image of small intestine anatomy.

Undigested material, such as plant fiber, is passed next to the large intestine, mostly in liquid form. The large intestine is wider than the small intestine but only about 6 feet long. It is the final portion of the digestive tract and includes the cecum, the appendix, the colon, and the rectum, which extends to the anus.

Cecum and Appendix. The cecum and the appendix are located in the lower-right quadrant of the abdomen.

Colon. The colon absorbs excess water and salts into the blood. The remaining waste matter is converted to feces through bacterial action. The colon is divided into four major sections.

Click the icon to see an image of large intestine anatomy.

The first section, the ascending colon, extends upward from the cecum on the right side of the abdomen.
The second section, the transverse colon, crosses the upper abdomen to the left side.
The third section extends downward on the left side of the abdomen toward the pelvis and is called the descending colon.
The final section is the sigmoid colon.

Rectum and Anus. Feces are stored in the descending and sigmoid colon until they are passed through the rectum and anus. The rectum extends through the pelvis from the end of the sigmoid colon to the anus.

Causes

In most cases of colon or rectal cancers, the cause or causes are unknown. Defects in genes that normally protect against cancer play the major role in causing polyp cells to continuously spread and become cancerous. Some of these cases are caused by inherited genetic defects, and such patients usually have family histories of colorectal cancer. Most of the genetic mutations involved in colon cancers, however, appear to arise spontaneously (no strong family history) rather than being inherited. In such cases, environmental or other factors trigger genetic changes in the intestine that lead to cancer.

About 6% of cases of colon cancer are due to inherited factors.

APC Gene and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP). When the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene is normal, it helps suppress tumor growth. In its defective form, it permits high levels of the protein beta-catenin to accumulate, which accelerates cell growth leading to polyps. Various genetic mutations that affect the APC gene directly or indirectly have been identified:

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a rare and serious disorder in which the patient inherits an adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutation from either parent. It occurs in about 1 in 8,000 people. During early adulthood, hundreds to thousands of polyps grow in the colon. FAP causes less than 1% of all cases of colorectal cancer, but if untreated, virtually everyone who inherits this condition develops cancer before the age of 40. Many of the deaths attributed to FAP can be prevented with early and aggressive surgical treatment.
Non-inherited mutations of the APC gene have been detected in nearly all patients with spontaneous colon cancers.

Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC). Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome, accounts for at least half of colorectal cancers that run in families. (However, only 3% or less of all colorectal cancers are due to this problem). About 50 - 80% of people who inherit the abnormal gene will develop colon cancer. HNPCC tends to develop in the right side of the colon, often in young individuals. (Left-sided cancers can still occur as well.)

People who inherit HNPCC and other defects are prone to other cancers, including uterine and ovarian cancers, as well as cancers of the small intestine and kidney system (very rare). HNPCC is highly associated with genes containing an abnormality called microsatellite instability (MSI), which is a sign of defective DNA repair. Testing tumors for MSI in people with newly diagnosed colon cancer who also have a family history of the disease may prove to be an effective method for identifying patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Tests are being developed that can detect the actual HNPCC genetic abnormality (mutation) that was inherited from a father or mother. The two most commonly affected genes are MSH2 and MLH1.

Cyclooxygenases and Prostaglandins. Cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 (COX-1 and COX-2) are enzymes involved in the production of prostaglandins, substances produced by the body that cause inflammation, widen and narrow blood vessels, control muscle contractions, and inhibit hormones that regulate fat metabolism. COX-2, but not COX-1, appears to play a role in the development and spread of colorectal tumors. COX-2 increases the levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which, in turn, stimulates factors that inhibit apoptosis, the natural process whereby all cells, including cancerous ones, self-destruct. It also activates interleukin-6 (IL-6), a factor in the immune system that is associated with cancer cell invasion.

C-Reactive Protein (CRP). CRP is another indicator of inflammation. In a 2004 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, elevated CRP levels predicted the development of colon -- but not rectal -- cancer.

Bile Acid Salts. Deoxycholic acid, which is found in the fat-digesting bile salts released by the gallbladder, appears to have carcinogenic properties. Its effects are now believed to play a role in some cases of colon cancer. Levels of the acid can rise as a result of high-fat diets or certain diseases.

Growth Factors. Chronically higher circulating levels of growth factors, including insulin-like growth factor, have been associated with colorectal cancer.

Inflammatory bowel diseases include Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. These chronic disorders cause persistent injuries in the intestinal tract that can, in some cases, produce cancerous changes.

Symptoms

It is possible to have colon or rectal cancer without symptoms. Many patients are free of symptoms until their tumors are quite advanced.

Weight loss and changes in bowel movements are general symptoms for colon cancer, but these symptoms also occur in many other diseases.

Blood in the stools is a common sign of many intestinal cancers. It may appear red if it is fresh or black if it is old. It should be reported to a doctor immediately, even though it is often caused by conditions other than cancer, including:

Hemorrhoids
Minor tears around the rectal or anal areas
Diverticulosis

In addition, stool can change color by:

Eating certain red foods, such as beets or red licorice (red)
Taking iron supplements and medications that have bismuth subsalicylate, most commonly Pepto-Bismol (black)

Nevertheless, blood in the stools is an abnormal finding that should never be ignored. Always report it to your doctor for further advice.

Symptoms of colorectal cancer vary widely depending on the location of the cancer within the large intestine.

Tumors in the Cecum and Ascending Colon (Right Colon). The waste matter in the first portion of the colon is in liquid or semi-liquid form. Tumors that develop here do not change bowel habits or stool formation, but they may cause intermittent or chronic bleeding. Although the stools look normal, patients may develop symptoms of anemia from iron deficiency. Such symptoms include weakness, fatigue, heart palpitations, shortness of breath, and exercise intolerance.

Tumors in the Transverse Colon. As waste material passes across the upper quadrants of the abdomen (the transverse colon), the intestine absorbs water, and the waste matter becomes more solid. In addition to bleeding, tumors here may cause cramps, gas, partial or complete obstruction, and even perforation of the bowel. Anemia can also occur.

Tumors in the Descending Colon and Rectum (Left Colon). When tumors partially block the lower intestine, thin, pencil-shaped stools may form. Bowel habits can change. Tumors in the rectum and lowest part of the intestine can cause pain and a feeling of fullness. Defecation may be painful, or patients may feel the urge to defecate but nothing happens. Bleeding from these locations may be brisk and bright red or maroon, but cancer is often detected before symptoms of chronic anemia develop.

Risk Factors

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the U.S., with Americans facing a lifetime chance of 5.5 - 6% for this cancer. In 2007, colorectal cancer was expected to cause 153,760 new cases and 52,180 deaths in the United States. About 73% of cancers occur in the colon and 27% in the rectum.

The lifetime risk of cancer of the colon or rectum is 5.9% for men and 5.5% for women.

Colorectal cancer risk increases with age. More than 90% of these cancers occur in people over age 50. The rate of colorectal cancer in patients under 20 years is less than 1 in 100,000 per year. At age 50 about 1 in 2,000 people per year will develop colorectal cancer. After age 65, this rate increases to almost 3 in 1,000.

African-Americans have the highest risk of being diagnosed with, and dying from, colorectal cancer. Among Caucasians, Jews of Eastern European (Ashkenazi) descent have an elevated rate of colorectal cancer. Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders, Hispanics/Latinos, and American Indians/Alaska Natives have a lower risk than Caucasians.

About 20 - 25% of colorectal cancers occur among people with a family history of the disease. (Seventy-five percent of cases are due to other causes.) People who have more than one first-degree relative (sibling or parent) with the disease are especially at high risk. The risk is even higher if the relative was diagnosed with colorectal cancer before the age of 60.

About 5 - 10% of patients with colorectal cancer have an inherited genetic abnormality that causes the disease. Genetic mutations associated with colorectal cancer include familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

The risks for colon cancer are far higher in industrialized nations than less developed countries. A Western lifestyle, being sedentary, smoking, and having excess weight have all been associated with increased risk for colorectal cancer. (However, about 75% of cases occur without a known predisposing factor.)

Dietary Factors. Eating a lot of red meat increases the risk for colorectal cancer. Other types of animal protein (low-fat dairy products, fish, poultry) may decrease the risk of developing polyps and colorectal cancer. Studies on fruits, vegetables, and fiber are mixed. Some evidence suggests that diets very low in fruits and vegetables may increase the risk. In any case, eating a variety of fruits and vegetables should be part of a healthy diet.

A 2007 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggested that diet may play a role in colorectal cancer recurrence, as well as prevention. The study evaluated patients with stage III colon cancer who had been treated with surgery and chemotherapy. Patients who ate diets high in red and processed meats, refined grains, and sweets had a higher risk of cancer recurrence and poorer survival than patients whose diets were high in fruits and vegetables, poultry, and fish.

Alcohol and Smoking. Alcohol use and smoking increase the risk for colorectal cancer. Patients who smoke and drink may also be diagnosed with colorectal cancer at a younger age than non-drinkers and non-smokers. Several studies suggest that women who smoke are at especially high risk of developing colorectal cancer.

Obesity. There is a demonstrated link between body mass and colon cancer risk for both men and women. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported that the risk of colon cancer rises as body mass index increases. Obesity has been associated biologically with higher circulating levels of insulin and a hormone called insulin-like growth factor. Chronically high levels of these substances may increase colorectal cancer risk.

Physical Inactivity. More than 50 studies from around the world suggest that physical activity helps prevent colon cancer. In contrast, exercise does not protect against rectal cancer.

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic afflictions of the large intestine known as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Both have been linked to increased risk for colorectal cancer. (Patients with ulcerative colitis have a higher risk than those with Crohn's disease.) Family histories are helpful in determining risk associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Some studies suggest the following:

Patients with IBD who have a family history of colorectal cancer face up to a five-fold risk of colon cancer themselves.
Individuals without IBD who have relatives who suffered from both IBD and colorectal cancer may face a higher risk for developing colorectal cancer themselves.
Individuals without IBD but with a family history of IBD and no colon cancer most likely face no higher risk for cancer themselves.

Crohn's disease, also called regional enteritis, is a chronic inflammation of the intestines that is usually confined to the terminal portion of the small intestine, the ileum. Ulcerative colitis is a similar inflammation of the colon, or large intestine. These and other inflammatory bowel diseases have been linked with an increased risk of colorectal cancer.

Polyps. Polyps are tissue growths, usually benign, that develop in the color or rectum, most often in patients over 50 years of age. When pathologists examine polyps removed from the colon, they classify them as either hyperplastic or adenomatous. Both types are benign, but some adenomas will become malignant. As a preventive measure, polyps should be removed (polypectomy).

Ureterosigmoidostomy. People who have had ureterosigmoidostomy, a surgical procedure to correct a birth defect in the bladder or to treat some bladder cancers, may develop tumors near the site of the defect, which is chronically exposed to urine and feces. Such patients have a 5 - 10% chance of developing colon cancer 15 - 30 years after the operation.

Diabetes. Many studies have identified an association between type 2 diabetes and colon cancer. Both diseases share common risk factors of obesity and physical inactivity, but diabetes itself is a risk factor for colorectal cancer. Both men and women who have diabetes are at risk.

Heart Disease. Coronary artery disease (CAD) increases the risk for colorectal cancer. Both CAD and colorectal cancer share important risk factors, including smoking, high fat diet, sedentary lifestyle, and obesity.

Dietary Factors

Some, but not all, studies have suggested that a high intake of fruits and vegetables can lower the risk for colorectal cancer. One study, for example, reported that these foods do not prevent polyps from forming but may help prevent them from becoming cancerous.

Phytochemicals. Many studies have demonstrated the cancer-fighting effects of plant chemicals called phytochemicals. Fruits and vegetables that contain phytochemicals can often be identified by colors:

Dark green (broccoli, spinach, kale, collard greens, mustard greens). These vegetables contain chemicals called isothiocyanates, which have been associated with a lower risk for cancer in general.
Red (red pepper, tomatoes, watermelon, raspberries, pink grapefruit). Lycopene is a chemical found in these foods that may have strong cancer-protective properties. Cooking tomatoes appears to increase their benefits.
Yellow-orange (carrots, pumpkin, sweet potatoes, oranges, tangerines). The colors in these foods are due to carotenoids. Carotenoids have been associated with health protection, although they may not have much effect on colon cancer itself.
Blue-black (many berries). Dark berries appear to have potent antioxidant chemicals that may be protective against cancer.

Organosulfurs are important food chemicals that are part of the allium family. Studies have reported health benefits from foods containing them. These compounds are found in garlic, leeks, onions, chives, scallions, and shallots. A review of 300 studies concluded that people who eat raw or cooked garlic regularly experience about two-thirds the risk of colorectal cancer as people who eat little or none. Another analysis, however, found the available evidence about garlic to be inconclusive. Garlic supplements, in any case, do not appear to be protective.

Fiber. Studies have been mixed on whether fiber (found in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains) protects the colon from cancer. For example, three major studies in 2002 and 2003 reported no difference in the development of colorectal polyps or cancer recurrence with high intake of fiber. On the other hand, results of the 2003 European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) -- the largest study ever conducted on the role of diet in the development of cancer -- suggested that fiber is protective regardless of its source. However, in the study, the greatest benefits were observed for the left side of the colon and the least for the rectum. In any case, fiber, which is only found in plant products, may be beneficial for the heart and have other health advantages.

The role of fats in inflammatory bowel disease is complex and not fully known. A 2006 study from the Women’s Health Initiative found that a low-fat diet did not help reduce the risk for colorectal cancer. However, the study did not distinguish between types of fat.

Monounsaturated fats (olive, peanut, canola oils; avocados, nuts) and omega-3 polyunsaturated fats (fish, flaxseed oil, walnuts) are the healthiest types of fats.
Saturated fats (red meat, butter, high-fat dairy products) and trans-fats (hydrogenated fat found in snack foods, fried foods, commercial baked goods) are unhealthy types of fats.

Dietary guidelines recommend that adults limit the total fat in their diet to 25 - 35% of total daily calories. Saturated fat intake should be less than 7%, and trans fats less than 1%, of total daily calories. (Patients with heart disease or diabetes may need to limit unhealthy fat in their diet even further.) Most fats should come from polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fat sources.

[See In-Depth Report #43: Heart healthy diet; and #42: Diabetes diet.]

Evidence strongly suggests that red meat raises the risk for colon cancer development, and perhaps also recurrence. Red meat contains dietary iron, which has been associated with a higher risk for colon cancer.

High-temperature cooking (grilling, broiling, or pan-frying) has been specifically associated with increased risk for colon polyps and colon cancer. Overcooking meat increases the amount of carcinogens called heterocyclic amines, which has been associated with cancerous changes.

Milk, Lactose, and Probiotics. In one study, adults who drank the most milk had the lowest risk for colon cancer. A 2004 study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute supported this conclusion. In this review of 10 epidemiologic studies that included more than 500,000 people, those who consumed more milk and calcium had a lower risk of developing colorectal cancer. Milk contains not only calcium but also other compounds, such as lactose, that may help protect against colon cancer.

Yogurt specifically has been associated with a lower risk for colon cancer if it contains live active bacterial cultures, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, that are called probiotics. These "friendly bacteria" appear to protect the colon from cancerous changes. (Acidophilus and other probiotic capsules are also available in health food stores.)

Calcium. Calcium, which is found in dairy products, is associated with colon cancer protection. Many studies have shown a possible protective effect from either high-calcium diets or calcium supplements. However, a 2006 study from the Women’s Health Initiative found that calcium and vitamin D supplements do not reduce women’s colorectal cancer risk. Many doctors still recommend that postmenopausal women take these supplements for bone health.

Obesity has been associated with colon cancer. In some studies of people under 67 years old, the amounts of fat and protein were less important than the total number of calories consumed: the higher the energy intake, the greater the risk for developing colon cancer. In older adults, high calorie intake did not make any significant difference. Other studies have indicated that eating too much sugar may increase the risk for colon cancer.

Studies conducted in several countries have found that drinking four or more cups of coffee a day is associated with a lower risk for colorectal cancer. Green tea may have also beneficial properties, but more research is needed in both of these areas.

Folate and B Vitamins. For years, many doctors have believed that the B vitamin folate (called folic acid) may help protect against colorectal cancer, particularly for people who are genetically predisposed to this disease. Folate is found in beans, citrus fruits, and green vegetables, but some studies have indicated that the greatest protective benefits come from taking supplements.

However, an important study published in 2007 in the Journal of the American Medical Association challenged this assumption. The study suggested that high-dose folic acid supplements do not prevent colorectal cancer, and may actually increase the risk for developing certain types of colorectal tumors. The study evaluated over 1,000 men and women who had a recent history of non-cancerous colorectal polyps. (Adenomatous polyps, also called colorectal ademomas, are the most common type of polyp found in colorectal cancer screenings.) The results indicated that patients who took 1 mg/day of folic acid supplements were more likely to develop new adenomatous polyps than patients who did not take supplements. Patients in the folic acid supplement group were also more likely to have advanced adenomas and more numerous adenomas.

Adenomatous polyps are benign tumors, but they can potentially develop into cancerous tumors. Researchers are continuing to investigate the role that folic acid plays in colorectal cancer risk and prevention. It is possible that folic acid may help prevent the initial appearance of adenomatous polyps, but increase the risk for additional polyp formation once they have begun to occur.

Antioxidant Supplements. Antioxidants are chemicals that help eliminate harmful particles called oxygen-free radicals that have been associated with cancerous changes. Some studies have associated supplements of the antioxidants selenium and vitamins A, C, D, and E with lower colon cancer risk, but most studies have found no protective effect.

Prevention

Studies indicate that daily exercise is one of the best ways to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. The more vigorous the activity, the greater the benefit, but even moderate exercise (walking, stair-climbing) can help reduce colorectal cancer risk. The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends that people engage in at least moderate exercise for 30 minutes or more at least 5 days a week. The ACS also notes that 45 minutes or more of moderate-to-vigorous activity at least 5 days a week may help further reduce cancer risk.

Some studies also suggest that regular exercise may be beneficial for patients who have been diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Two 2006 studies indicated that exercise may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer recurrence and death for patients with stage I - III cancer.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are very common pain relievers that are available over-the-counter and by prescription. They include aspirin, ibuprofen (Motrin), naproxen (Aleve), and the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex). Several studies have reported that NSAIDs help reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. However, regular use of NSAIDs, even in low doses, can increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and stomach ulcers. Long-term use of NSAIDs can also increase the risk for heart attack and stroke, especially in people who have a history of heart disease. Several 2006 and 2007 studies in the New England Journal of Medicine reported that celecoxib prevented precancerous polyps, but the drug more than doubled patients’ risk for heart attack and other cardiovascular events.

A 2005 Nurse’s Health Study found that aspirin, but not other NSAIDs, does provide protection against colorectal cancer. However, the risk was only reduced for women who took 2 aspirin a day for more than 10 years. In addition, this dose level greatly increases the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. Furthermore, a 2007 study in the New England Journal of Medicine suggested that aspirin’s protective effects may only apply to some types of colorectal cancer tumors. Another 2007 study, published in the Lancet, indicated that long-term daily use of aspirin can protect against polyps and colorectal cancer, but experts agree that aspirin’s risks do not outweigh its benefits for most people. (Some people who are at high risk for developing colorectal cancer may benefit from aspirin therapy.)

In March 2007, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against the routine use of aspirin and other NSAIDs to prevent colorectal cancer in people at average risk for this disease. (This recommendation does not apply to people who have a family history of colorectal cancer or who are at high risk for developing colorectal cancer due to other risk factors.) Long-term use of NSAIDs can increase the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding, kidney function problems, and heart problems. Aspirin can also increase the risk for hemorrhagic stroke. Due to these risks, the American Cancer Society and other professional associations also recommend against the use of NSAIDs or other types of medications for colorectal cancer prevention.

Medications containing 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) are sometimes given to patients with ulcerative colitis to help control inflammation. These drugs, which include sulfasalazine and mesalamine, are chemically related to aspirin. A 2005 review of clinical trials found that patients with ulcerative colitis who used 5-ASA were 49% less likely to develop colorectal cancer than patients who did not use these drugs

Some studies have suggested that cholesterol-lowering statin drugs may help reduce colorectal cancer risk. A 2006 study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute did not find any protective benefit for statins.

Estrogen has been associated with a lower risk for colon cancer, perhaps because of specific enzymes that prevent cell proliferation. Drugs containing estrogen, then, may help high-risk women:

There is some evidence that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) reduces the risk of colon cancer in postmenopausal women. It carries other risks, however, including a higher risk for breast and uterine cancer and blood clots. A 2004 New England Journal of Medicine study found that while short-term use of estrogen plus progestin reduced the risk of developing colon cancer, combination HRT users who were diagnosed with the disease had more advanced forms of the cancer. Older women who are at higher risk for colon cancer might discuss risks and benefits of HRT with their doctor.
Oral contraceptives may reduce younger women's risk of colon cancer. Duration of use does not seem to be associated with decreased risk, but protection appears stronger for women who have more recently used oral contraceptives.

Diagnosis

Colon and rectal cancers are diagnosed using the screening tests discussed below. These tests can detect precancerous polyps and colorectal cancers at stages early enough for complete removal and cure.

Unfortunately, only 30 - 40% of adults over 50 years old (mostly in the upper socioeconomic group) have regular screening tests that could detect a cancer early enough for curative treatment. A survey reported that many people are not screened because they are too embarrassed. Those who had already had the tests were willing to have them again if they saved one additional day of their lives.

There is some debate about what is the best screening method. Current screening guidelines offer several different options for patients. Doctors agree that not enough people are screened and that these tests, if adopted with the same regularity as such screening tests as Pap smears, would save many lives. It is especially important for anyone at increased risk or with symptoms, such as rectal bleeding or ulcerative colitis, to have testing at an earlier age.

There is also debate about when people should stop being screened. A 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that screening provides little benefit for elderly people, especially because colorectal cancers grow very slowly. The researchers suggest that doctors should carefully consider the risks versus benefits of screening patients age 80 and older.

Individuals should discuss with their doctors the risks and benefits of all screening procedures. Some controversy exists over how often people without risk factors for cancer should be screened and which detection method should be used for them.

Guidelines for Adults Age 50 and Over with Average Risk. The following are the five screening options recommended for people age 50 and over who have no symptoms and no family history of colon cancer:

Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) every year
Flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years
FOBT or FIT every year plus sigmoidoscopy every 5 years
Double-contrast barium enema every 5 years
Colonoscopy every 10 years

Choosing between Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy. The choice between colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy for routine screening for older adults with average risk is an area of intense debate. The issues are as follows:

Sigmoidoscopy is less costly, less invasive, quicker, and safer than colonoscopy. Although it allows inspection of only the left side of the colon, any abnormal findings from sigmoidoscopy trigger a full colonoscopy. Therefore, experts estimate that sigmoidoscopy can detect 80% of all significant problems.
Colonoscopy is more sensitive than any other current screening method for detecting colon cancer. It can find 75 - 90% of colorectal cancers. If the goal were to reduce the number of cancer cases, regardless of cost, colonoscopy would be the preferred approach. Colonoscopy, however, is more expensive than sigmoidoscopy and has a slightly higher risk for complications (bowel tears or bleeding when a polyp is removed).

There are 3 basic tests for colon cancer: a stool test (to check for blood), sigmoidoscopy (inspection of the lower colon), and colonoscopy (inspection of the entire colon). All 3 are effective in catching cancers in the early stages, when treatment is most beneficial.

Screening, particularly with colonoscopy, in increased- and high-risk populations can save lives. The most important risk factors are a family history of colorectal cancer and personal history of colorectal cancer, polyps, or chronic inflammatory bowel disease. People with these risk factors should be screened before age 50 and may need more frequent screenings.

Guidelines for Increased-Risk Groups. Anyone with first-degree relatives diagnosed with colon cancer younger than 60, or with two relatives who have been diagnosed with colon cancer at any age, should consider beginning the standard screening regimen with a colonoscopy every 5 years, beginning at age 40 or 10 years before the youngest case in the family (whichever is earlier).

Men of African descent are also considered to be at increased risk for colon cancer and should discuss similar screening guidelines with their doctors.

Guidelines for High-Risk Groups. The following guidelines may be useful for specific high-risk groups.

People who have the mutated hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene (MSH2 or MLH-). Frequent colonoscopy (for instance, every 1 - 2 years) beginning in their early 20s. (Regular screening for other cancers, such as uterine cancer, is also reasonable.)
People who have the mutated familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) gene. Frequent screening with endoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) beginning in early puberty. Genetic testing is now recommended for family members of people with known FAP.
People with predisposing intestinal problems, such as widespread and active ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Annual screening with colonoscopy with biopsies of suspicious areas.

Guidelines for Follow-Up After Detection of Precancerous Polyps. Patients who have had a previous examination in which polyps were detected (and removed) should have a repeat colonoscopy 1 - 3 years later, depending on the size, number, and type of polyps removed.

The digital rectal examination is used to detect tumors in the rectum, lower intestine, and prostate gland. The doctor inserts a lubricated-gloved finger into the patient's rectum and feels for lumps or other abnormalities. The exam is quick and painless but embarrassing for some. Fewer than 10% of colon cancers develop within the region that can be evaluated by a DRE, so it is not useful as a sole screening test.

Blood in bowel movements is not always visible, in which case it is called occult (hidden) blood. Fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are used to detect this hidden blood. The most common FOBT method is called the guaiac-based test. The patient is asked to supply up to six stool specimens in a specially prepared package. A small quantity of feces is smeared on specially treated paper, which reacts to hydrogen peroxide. If blood is present, the paper turns blue.

Accuracy. FOBTs can miss more than 75% of advanced cancers. Nevertheless, large studies have indicated that this simple test, performed annually, saves lives and may reduce the risk of dying from colon cancer by 15 - 33%. The following factors may affect its accuracy:

The levels of iron in the blood can affect results. Patients should not take iron supplements or eat red meats several days before the test.
Certain raw fruits and vegetables that contain the chemical peroxidase (cauliflower, horseradish, radishes, melons, and turnips) can cause a positive test reaction even if no blood is present.
Aspirin and NSAIDs are anticoagulants that can cause minor bleeding. They should not be taken for a week before the test. However, a 2005 study suggested that the prescription anticoagulant warfarin does not affect FOBT results.
Vitamin C and foods rich in this vitamin may cause a false negative reaction and should be avoided a few days before the test.
Bleeding from other causes, such as menstruation, hemorrhoids, gingivitis, or urinary infections, can produce blood in the stools and affect results.

Even if none of these conditions is present, a test that shows hidden blood does not necessarily mean that cancer is present. About 20 - 30% of people with occult blood have noncancerous polyps or other conditions, such as gastritis, and only 5 - 10% actually have cancer. Any abnormal result, however, requires further testing, such as colonoscopy.

Lack of Compliance. Compliance is a major problem. Patients are asked to perform the tests at home and send the test cards to the laboratory. Only 35 - 50% of patients actually follow through. Occult-blood tests that give results at home are available but are extremely inaccurate. In one large study, these tests failed to detect advanced cancer in about 62% of cases, although they may detect some early cancers.

If a digital rectal exam (DRE) or fecal occult blood test (FOBT) shows signs of trouble, several methods to visualize the colon are available. They include colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema. They have the following similarities and differences:

Sigmoidoscopy can only view the rectum and the left side of the colon, while colonoscopy and barium enemas allow a view of the entire large intestine.
Both flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy involve snaking a fiber optic tube through regions of the rectum and colon to view the walls of the intestine. The tube contains a tiny camera that transmits the image to a video screen. The use of an ultrasound (sound wave) scanner is proving to enhance viewing quality. Barium enemas simply use x-rays.
During either sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, the doctor is able to remove polyps or other abnormalities revealed by these procedures with surgical instruments inserted through the tube. It is not possible to remove polyps with a barium enema, which is not invasive.

Sigmoidoscopy. Sigmoidoscopy examines the rectum and the lower two feet of the colon. It cannot, however, detect the roughly half of cancers that occur in the right colon. Right-sided cancers are more common in older people.

The procedure uses a flexible fiber optic tube (it is thus referred to as flexible sigmoidoscopy) that contains a tiny camera and surgical instruments.
It lasts about 10 minutes and may be mildly uncomfortable, but it is not painful and is generally very safe. In one study, 70% of patients reported that the procedure was far less unpleasant than they had expected.

This procedure has been found to reduce the risk of fatal cancers in the rectal and sigmoid area by 60%. If polyps are detected, a colonoscopy is then used.

Colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is the most accurate testing method and can reduce cancer incidence by up to 90%. It is clearly indicated for anyone with an increased risk for colorectal cancer, including those with a personal or family history of the disease. As with sigmoidoscopy, a colonoscopy uses a flexible tube, but it is snaked through the entire large intestine.

For about a day before the procedure the patient eats nothing and drinks a laxative solution that cleans out the colon. The taste of the solution is unpleasant, although it has improved in recent years.
The procedure typically uses a sedative that produces a "twilight" sleep and often makes the procedure more comfortable than sigmoidoscopy.
Air may be introduced into the intestine to widen it and allow the tube to navigate curves. A colonoscopy avoids the risk of radiation associated with a barium enema, but it is important to note that even a colonoscopy does not detect all cancers.

Complications are rare, but include the following:

Hyponatremia. Hyponatremia is a low concentration of sodium in the blood. The complication may be caused by the effects of bowel cleaning before the procedure that can result in water retention and reductions in sodium. When severe, it can cause temporary neurological symptoms, such as confusion, lethargy, unsteadiness, and slurred speech. Researchers suggest that sodium concentrations be measured in patients who develop such symptoms after colonoscopy.
Bowel perforation (very low risk, about 2 in 1,000 procedures). The risk for bowel perforation is greater with colonoscopy than flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Bleeding at the site of biopsy or polyp removal.

Overall, colonoscopy is a safe procedure. However, according to a 2006 study in the Annals of Internal Medicine, serious complications occur in about 5 of every 1,000 colonoscopies. Most of these complications occurred when a biopsy or polyp removal was performed. (The risk for complications without biopsy or polyp removal is about 1 in every 1,000 colonoscopies.) This study looked at colonoscopies in general, including those that are done to diagnose the causes of a patient's symptoms. The risk may be lower for colonoscopies performed solely to screen for colorectal cancer.

Barium Enema. The double-contrast barium enema, which uses an x-ray image, is the less expensive alternative for viewing the entire colon. It is not as accurate as colonoscopy, and if any polyps or abnormalities are revealed on x-ray, a colonoscopy is then required to remove suspicious tissue, so it is now recommended much less often than in the past.

The barium enema is a valuable diagnostic tool that helps detect abnormalities in the large intestine (colon). The barium enema, along with colonoscopy, remains the standard in the diagnosis of colon cancer, ulcerative colitis, and other diseases of the colon.

Screening for familial adenomatous polyposis. Genetic screening for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) is now available and may be recommended for high-risk patients. The test for FAP detects a mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli in up to 90% of people who carry it. Testing for HNPCC mutation is somewhat more complex.

Screening for insulin-like growth factor. A gene that regulates insulin-like growth factor (IGF-2) is functional during fetal development and then becomes inactive. Some evidence now suggests that people who have IGF-2 in adulthood have a higher risk for colon cancer. Blood tests for detecting IGF-2, then, may be helpful in identifying patients who should have more intensive screening. Currently, however, this is only used as a research tool.

Stool DNA Testing. A promising technique for colorectal cancer screening is the detection of altered DNA in cancer cells that have shed from the colon and are excreted in the stool. Such tests may prove to detect both inherited and noninherited genetic mutations. This may become a widely used tool in the future. However, larger clinical studies are needed.

Virtual Colonoscopy. A promising experimental technique called virtual colonoscopy allows three-dimensional imaging of the colon without using invasive instruments. As with standard colonoscopy, the patient takes a laxative first to clear out the intestine. The procedure itself involves pumping air into the colon and scanning the intestine using computed tomography (CT). It is very safe and takes about only 10 minutes. The procedure is similar in accuracy to conventional colonoscopy for detection of larger polyps (6 mm or more in diameter) and is also potentially less expensive. Colonoscopy is required, however, if suspicious areas are found, which may occur frequently with the CT procedure, since it erroneously identifies a high number of nonexistent polyps.

A study published in April 2004 in the Journal of the American Medical Association compared results of standard colonoscopy versus virtual colonoscopy in over 600 patients at nine major medical centers. Virtual colonoscopy had much lower rates of successfully finding polyps than standard colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy detected polyps of at least 6 mm in 39% of patients and polyps of at least 10 mm in 55% of patients. By contrast, standard colonoscopy detected 99% of polyps of at least 6 mm, and 100% of polyps of at least 10 mm. In addition, accuracy rates varied widely among the different hospitals. The authors advised that until more improvement in training and technique is achieved, virtual colonoscopy "is not yet ready for widespread clinical application."

Magnetic Resonance Colonography. Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) is another non-invasive technique for visualizing the colon. The patient receives an enema containing a contrast substance, and then magnetic resonance images are taken. MRC is fast, comfortable, and less invasive than colonoscopy. Currently, however, there is a poor detection rate for flat tumors and for polyp tumors less than 10 mm in diameter.

Staging

A diagnosis of cancer will lead to staging and other tests to help determine the outlook and the appropriate treatments.

The large intestine is a long hollow organ lined with mucous membrane (mucosa). Muscle layers wrap around the entire length and help move food material through to the rectum.

Unlike many other cancers, the size of the tumor is not a major factor in determining the outcome of colorectal cancer. Of greater importance is how far the cancer has spread. To determine this, doctors will assign a stage to the tumor. There are several methods for staging. The older system, known as Dukes', categorizes four basic stages: A, B, C, and D. A more recent system refers to these stages as I, II, III, and IV but divides the categories slightly differently. The term "5-year survival" means that patients have lived at least 5 years since diagnosis. Most patients who live 5 years without a recurrence are considered to be cured of their disease.


Stage	Condition	5-Year Survival
A or I	Tumor superficially involves the inner lining of the intestine.	More than 90%
B or II	Tumor has penetrated through the muscle wall of the intestine but has not reached the lymph nodes.	70 - 85%
C or III	Lymph nodes are involved.	65% or below
D or IV	Tumor has spread to other organs (metastasized), usually the liver first.	5 - 9%

Click the icon to see an image of the stages of cancer.

Researchers are continually seeking to identify tumor markers, substances (usually found in blood samples) that will assist in the diagnosis of cancer and in monitoring effects of treatment.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen. High blood levels of a protein called carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) sometimes indicate the presence of colon cancer. Unfortunately, it is also elevated in other cancers and in some noncancerous conditions. CEA is not effective as a screening tool for healthy people, but might eventually be helpful for patients with cancer.

An advanced diagnostic technique called polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can detect genetic evidence of CEA. One study indicated that when these microscopic footprints of colon cancer are detected in the lymph nodes of patients with Stage II cancer (whose lymph nodes otherwise appear to be not involved with cancer), the outlook is similar to that of patients with Stage III cancer. Patients without this so-called micrometastasis have a very favorable prognosis. Further research is needed, however, before PCR can be used in widespread practice.
In patients with a history of, or active, colon cancer, follow-up measuring of blood CEA levels may be helpful in detecting recurrence of the cancer and effectiveness of treatments.

Defective P53 Gene. The presence of a defective p53 gene is a marker for very poor prognosis in patients with advanced colon cancer. In its normal state, the gene is important for regulation of cell growth. Testing for this abnormality, however, is not widely done because it is not clear how to use this information.

Other Tumor Markers. Other tumor markers under investigation include a protein called GLUT1, cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) RNA, HER-2/neu oncoprotein, transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta-1), and CD44.

Click the icon to see an image of drawing blood for culture.

A technique known as a sentinel node biopsy is increasingly performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients. This procedure is used to determine if cancer has spread beyond the nodes, possibly reducing the need for complete axillary lymphadenectomies. It involves the following:

The procedure uses an injection of a tiny amount of a tracer, either a radioactively-labeled substance (radioisotope) or a blue dye, into the tumor site.
The tracer or dye then flows via the lymphatic system into the so-called sentinel node. This is the first lymph node to which any cancer would spread.
The sentinel lymph node and possibly one or two others are then removed.
If they do not show any signs of cancer, it is highly likely that the remainder of the lymph nodes will be cancer free, and further surgery becomes unnecessary.

It is still not known if the sentinel node biopsy has any survival advantages compared to the standard procedures with lymph nodes removal. However, one study indicated that careful and complete removal of potentially cancerous lymph nodes is still very important for improving survival in patients with Stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Whole-body imaging scans that combine positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) may be helpful in accurately staging colorectal cancer, according to preliminary research published in 2006 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Prognosis

Survival rates for colorectal cancer have been rising in recent years. The 5-year survival rate is as high as 90% for cancer that has not spread to the lymph nodes (localized cancer). When cancer has spread to lymph nodes and other parts of the body, survival rates drop to 65% and below. Because many cancers are detected at later stages, the overall survival rate is currently about 60%. African-Americans and other minorities tend to have lower survival rates than Caucasians. Studies suggest, however, these higher mortality rates are largely due to less access to optimal health care, including appropriate surgical care and aggressive treatments.

In most cases, age is not a factor in treatment success. Good survival rates are achieved in the elderly as well as in young people. Chances for survival are less in Stage II cancers if the intestine is obstructed or perforated. If cancer has spread to lymph nodes (Stage III), the outlook is better if three or fewer lymph nodes are involved. Treatment can prolong life even when cancer has spread.

Surgery

Surgical removal of the tumor ("resection") along with any affected surrounding tissue is the standard initial treatment for potentially curable colorectal cancers (cancers that have not spread beyond the colon or lymph nodes). Drug and radiation therapy are often used for advanced cancers and are continuously being tested with surgery in different combinations and sequences.

Although choosing a qualified surgeon is critical, choosing a hospital experienced in procedures is also important. The more often colon cancer surgery is performed at a given hospital, the lower the mortality rate at that hospital is likely to be.

Unless cancer is very advanced, most tumors are removed by an operation known as colectomy:

Colectomy involves removing the cancerous part of the colon and nearby lymph nodes.
The surgeon then reconnects the intestine.
If the surgeon cannot reconnect the intestine, usually because of infection or obstruction, the surgeon will perform a colostomy. The need for colostomies is higher after surgery for rectal cancer. In most cases of colon cancer, colostomies are not needed. [See "Colostomy" below.]

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing colon cancer treatment.

The Surgical Approach. The standard technique for a colectomy is open, invasive surgery. Laparoscopy, sometimes called “keyhole surgery,” is a less invasive method. Laparoscopy is still considered an investigational technique for treating colon cancer, but it is gaining more acceptance and showing good results in clinical trials.

Open Surgery:

Open surgery uses a wide incision to open the patient's abdomen. The surgeon then performs the procedures with standard surgical instruments. This is the usual method for performing colectomy.

Laparoscopy:

Laparoscopy uses a few small incisions through which the surgeon passes a fiber optic tube (laparoscope) containing a small camera or tiny instruments. It is generally used for early colon cancer (for tumors less than 2 centimeters or for well-defined tumors less than 3 centimeters).
A 2004 New England Journal of Medicine study found that patients who received laparoscopic colectomy had similar rates of surgical complications, cancer recurrence, and survival as those who received traditional open surgery. However, the patients who had laparoscopy recovered faster and did not need as many narcotic painkillers.
Several 2005 studies indicated that laparoscopy works as well as conventional surgery for treatment of colon cancer. However, laparoscopy does not appear to be as effective for rectal cancer.

Click the icon to see an image detailing pelvic laparoscopy.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a resection of the large intestine.

Other Investigational Measures. Researchers are testing expandable metal tube-like devices called stents to keep the intestine open. Stents may be used before a procedure to allow bowel cleansing or for long-term use to keep open colons that can't be operated on.

A colostomy is performed in order to bypass or remove the lower colon and rectum. The procedure generally involves creating a passage, called a stoma, through the abdominal wall that is connected to the colon. The feces pass through this passage and are eliminated. Patients must learn how to care for the stoma and keep the area sanitary.

A colostomy usually will have one opening (single-barreled), or there may be two loops opening through the skin (double-barreled).

Usually the colostomy is temporary and can be reversed by a second operation after about 3 - 6 months. It the rectum and sphincter muscles in the rectum need to be removed, the colostomy is permanent. Permanent colostomies are more common when the cancerous regions are within 2 - 3 centimeters of the anus. Fortunately, surgical advances and knowledge of the extent of safe margins are reducing the need for permanent colostomies.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a colostomy procedure.

Managing Permanent Colostomies. In cases where the colostomy is permanent, the patient must wear a colostomy pouch, which sticks to the skin using a special glue. Pouches are available as one- or two-piece systems. The one-piece system is simpler, but the two piece system allows replacement of the pouch without removing the tape.

For best results, the pouch should be emptied when about one-third full. It should be replaced 1 - 2 times a week, depending on signs of leakage (itching or burning of the skin near the stoma). The pouches are odor proof.

Surgical treatments for cancer in the rectum are complex since they involve muscles and tissue that are critical for urinary and sexual function.

Local Excision or Polypectomy for Early Stages. In order to preserve the function of the anal sphincter and prevent the need for colostomy, Stage I and Stage II tumors may be removed by local excision, sometimes followed by chemotherapy and radiation. In this procedure, the tumor is cut out without removal of a major section of rectum. In some cases cancer recurs, but a second operation may be possible. Another treatment for early-stage rectal cancer, called electrocoagulation, destroys tumors using a high frequency electric current. It is being tested in clinical trials.

Radical Resection. In about a third of cases of rectal cancer, the cancer occurs in the lower part of the rectum, where between 70 - 80% of cancers have spread beyond the rectal wall. These patients need a radical resection, in which surrounding structures, including the sphincter muscles that control bowel movements, must often be removed.

The use of chemotherapy and radiation prior to surgery may prevent the need for permanent colostomy in some patients. This is an active area of clinical research, and trials are under way to address this issue. Another technique, called coloanal anastomosis, reconstructs the area to avoid the need for colostomy, and may be appropriate in some patients.

Total Mesorectal Excision. Total mesorectal excision (TME) involves dissection and removal of the entire cancerous area of the rectum along with surrounding fatty regions where the lymph nodes are located (the mesorectum). When successful, TME preserves the sphincter muscle, reducing the need for a permanent colostomy. Increasing use of this procedure is resulting in lower recurrence rates, lower levels of impotence and incontinence, and better overall survival rates compared to other resection techniques. Some experts now recommend it as a first choice for certain patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Combining chemotherapy and radiation either before or after TME is yielding promising long-term results and a low risk for local recurrence. There are many questions, however, and it is not clear which approach is better for specific patients.

Side effects of colon surgery include:

Sexual dysfunction. This is of particular concern. In general, colostomy does not usually affect sexual function. However, wide rectal surgery can cause short- or long-term sexual dysfunction. Sildenafil (Viagra) may help men who experience this after surgery.
Irregular bowel movements.
Gas and flatulence. Pouching filters are available to reduce gas. Certain foods produce more gas than others -- usually within 6 - 8 hours after ingestion for colostomy patients. They include beans, oat bran, most fruit, and certain vegetables (cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, broccoli, and asparagus). To prevent swallowing air, patients should avoid sipping through straws, chewing gum, and chewing with their mouths open.
Diarrhea.
Bladder complications.
Sense of urinary urgency.
Fecal incontinence. Patients with rectal surgery have a higher risk for bowel dysfunction than those who had a colostomy.
Complications in or around the stoma. These can occur early after surgery to many years after the procedure. They include skin infection or breakdown, hernias, narrowing of the stoma, bleeding, and collapse.

There are no dietary restrictions, although many patients avoid foods that can produce gas. Everyone should drink plenty of fluids and get sufficient fiber.

The potential side effects of sexual and bowel dysfunction for colorectal surgical patients can be devastating, although many patients do very well and live normal productive lives. Positive emotions play a strong role in recovery. Patients who are depressed should discuss with a doctor all aspects of treatment that affect the quality of life, and consider seeking support groups.

Medications

Chemotherapy uses drugs that kill cancer cells throughout the body. There are two situations in which chemotherapy is used:

The adjuvant setting. Adjuvant refers to the use of chemotherapy after surgery in patients with Stage III tumors and selected patients with high-risk Stage II tumors (disease that is potentially curable). The goal of this therapy is to eliminate any cancer cells that surgery may have missed, thereby preventing recurrence and increasing the chance of cure. Patients of all ages, including the elderly, can benefit.
In metastatic disease. In patients with metastatic disease (where the cancer has spread to other parts of the body) the goal of chemotherapy is to shrink tumors, improve symptoms and quality of life, and lengthen life.

In the adjuvant setting, there are some differences in chemotherapy treatments between colon and rectal cancers:

Chemotherapy for Stage II is considered standard care for Stage II rectal cancer but is under debate for colon cancer.
Chemotherapy is standard for patients with Stage III colon cancer. Chemotherapy is also standard for patients with Stage III rectal cancer but is used in combination with radiation.

Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II colon cancer is controversial. Such patients tend to have a good outcome after surgery, and the positive effects of chemotherapy have been difficult to demonstrate. To date, the survival advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy in this group has been reported to be only in the range of 2%. However, better trials are still needed to confirm or refute the benefits in specific patient groups.

Although not yet known with certainty, some data suggest that certain patients with Stage II cancer may be at higher risk of recurrence and would theoretically benefit from adjuvant therapy. These include patients with cancers that have:

Obstructed the bowel
Perforated the wall of the colon
Adhered to structures outside the intestine

Advanced diagnostic techniques are under investigation for helping to select appropriate candidates for adjuvant therapy. None of these methods, however, are ready to be used routinely to help make treatment decisions. The decision whether to pursue chemotherapy for Stage II disease should be made after careful discussion between the patient and their oncologist, especially after features, such as bowel perforation or obstruction, are taken into account.

Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer. Since the early 1990s, adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU and leucovorin has been the standard of care for Stage III colon cancer. In recent years, the FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) regimen has also been used for chemotherapy following surgery. Numerous trials have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting reduces the absolute risk of death from colon cancer by about one-third and improves survival by 10%. Clinical trials are also investigating combinations of other drugs.

Chemotherapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Chemotherapy is either given directly into the arteries of the liver or intravenously (through a vein) with 5-FU and leucovorin. Oxaliplatin is sometimes added, but recent evidence suggests that the targeted therapy biologic drug bevacizumab may be a better addition. Other alternative chemotherapy choices are capecitabine, or irinotecan combined with cetuximab. Radiation therapy may be used in place of chemotherapy or in combination with it. Studies indicate that chemotherapy offers only a modest improvement in survival, but may help reduce symptoms.

Seven drugs are currently approved for colorectal cancer chemotherapy:

5-fluorouracil (5-FU, Adrucil), which is often given in combination with leucovorin (Wellcovorin). Leucovorin is a vitamin that helps boost the effectiveness of 5-FU.
Capecitabine (Xeloda)
Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin)
Irinotecan (Camptosar)
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Cetuximab (Erbitux)
Panitumumab (Vectibix)

Capecitabine is a pill form of 5-FU. The other drugs are administered intravenously. Many of these drugs are given in combination with each other. Common chemotherapy combination regimens include:

5-FU / LV (5-FU and leucovorin)
FOLFOX (5-FU with leucovorin and oxaliplatin)
FOLFORI (5-FU with leucovorin and irinotecan)
IFL (Irinotecan, 5-FU, leucovorin)
XELOX (Capecitabine and oxaliplatin)

Side effects occur with all chemotherapeutic drugs. They are more severe with higher doses and increase over the course of treatment. Because cancer cells grow and divide rapidly, anticancer drugs work by killing fast-growing cells. This means that healthy cells that multiply quickly can also be affected. The fast-growing normal cells most likely to be affected are blood cells forming in the bone marrow, and cells in the digestive tract, reproductive system, and hair follicles. Nausea and vomiting is a very common side effect, but drugs such as ondansetron (Zofran) can help provide relief. In general, side effects are nearly always temporary, and medications can help manage them. Most patients are able to continue with normal activities for all but perhaps 1 - 2 days a month.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) with Leucovorin. Adjuvant therapy using 5-fluorouracil, either alone or with leucovorin (5-FU/LV), is the standard treatment for patients with high-risk colon cancer (Stage III or select patients with Stage II tumors). Leucovorin, also called folinic acid, is a form of the B vitamin folic acid, which helps increase 5-FU’s effectiveness. Patients are given a series of cycles that usually continue for at least 6 months.

There are many different ways of giving 5-FU, including intravenously over several hours once a week, intravenously daily for 5 consecutive days every month, or as continuous infusion with a portable pump.

The side effects can be quite different, depending on the way 5-FU is given, and women may be more susceptible than men. In one analysis, 53% of women and 40% of men experienced severe side effects, while response rates and survival were similar for both sexes. Many patients, however, tolerate 5-FU with leucovorin well, with manageable side effects. The most common side effects include nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, loss of appetite, hair loss, swelling of hands and feet, rashes, and mouth sores.

Irinotecan. Irinotecan (Camptosar) blocks an enzyme essential for cell division. Irinotecan can be given alone or in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin. This combination therapy (irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV) is also referred to as the "Salz regimen," or IFL. When it was approved in the mid 1990s, irinotecan was the first new drug developed for colon cancer in over 30 years. Studies have shown that irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) significantly delays the time at which tumors progress and improves survival in metastatic cancer compared to 5-FU/LV alone. While the survival advantage is small, the combination has become the standard of care for metastatic cancer. Of concern, however, are studies that have reported an increased risk of death from toxic effects with the use of the three-drug combination. These deaths appeared to be related to blood-clotting complications. Doctors should carefully monitor dosages. Diarrhea is a common side effect of irinotecan.

Capecitabine. Capecitabine (Xeloda), an oral form of 5-FU, was approved in 2001 as a treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. It is the only pill approved for colorectal cancer. A major 2005 study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that capecitabine works as well as the standard 5-FU/LV regimen and causes significantly fewer side effects. The study involved patients with Stage III colon cancer who had undergone surgical removal of the tumor. In 2005, capecitabine was approved for postsurgical treatment of patients with Dukes’ C colon cancer. Capecitabine is also showing promise in combination with radiation therapy for rectal cancers.

Oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) is related to cisplatin, a widely used platinum-based chemotherapy drug. Oxaliplatin is used in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin. (This triple combination therapy is called the FOLFOX regimen.) Oxaliplatin was first approved in 2002 for use in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin as a second-line treatment for cancer that has progressed after initial therapy.

Since 2002, oxaliplatin has received additional approvals as a first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, and as a post-surgical treatment for patients who have undergone tumor resection.

Oxaliplatin can cause pain and tingling sensations in the hands and feet (neuropathy) that is worsened by exposure to cold. Recent research suggests that adding xaliproden (Xaprila) to the FOLFOX regimen may help reduce the frequency of neuropathy without interfering with the benefits of chemotherapy. Xaliproden is a drug used to treat the neurological disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (also known as Lou Gehrig's disease).

Bevacizumab. Bevacizumab (Avastin) was approved in February 2004 as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (advanced cancer that has spread in the body). It is used in combination with IFL (irinotecan, 5-FU, leucovorin). Bevacizumab is a genetically engineered monoclonal antibody that targets and inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein that regulates angiogenesis (the development of new blood vessels that feed a tumor's blood supply). It is the first anti-angiogenic therapy approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

In a study of 800 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, bevacizumab administered intravenously along with IFL extended survival by about 5 months longer than IFL alone. Common side effects of bevacizumab include nosebleeds, fatigue, diarrhea, and high blood pressure. Less common side effects include stroke, heart attacks, angina, and formation of holes in the colon and stomach (gastrointestinal perforation).

Cetuximab. Cetuximab (Erbitux) was approved in February 2004 for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. This monoclonal antibody drug targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a protein required by cancer cells in order to proliferate. It can be used either in combination with irinotecan or alone for patients who have not responded to irinotecan. Studies of the cetuximab-irinotecan combination suggest it can help in tumor shrinkage. It has a modest effect on survival, prolonging patients’ lives by about an additional month.

Panitumumab. Panitumumab (Vectibix) was approved in September 2006 for treatment of colorectal cancer that has metastasized following standard chemotherapy. Like cetuximab, panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody drug that targets EGFR. In clinical trials, panitumumab helped delay disease progression and prolong survival by about 3 months. About 8% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage. Common side effects of this drug include skin rash, fatigue, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea or constipation. Serious side effects include pulmonary fibrosis, severe skin rash, and skin reactions at the infusion site.

One of the most promising recent developments in cancer treatment research has been the emergence of so-called "targeted therapies." Traditional chemotherapy drugs can be effective, but because they do not distinguish between healthy and cancerous cells their generalized toxicity can cause severe side effects. Targeted therapies work on a molecular level by blocking specific mechanisms associated with cancer cell growth and division. Because they selectively target cancerous cells, they may induce less severe side effects. In addition, these drugs hold the promise of creating options for more individualized cancer treatment based on a patient's genotype. In the future, diagnostic tests may help doctors identify which patients are more likely to respond successfully to specific drugs.

Biologic therapies use the body's immune system to attack the cancer (immunotherapy). These drugs are derived from biological sources and include vaccines, monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), and gene therapies. Many targeted therapies are classified as biologics. Bevacizumab (Avastin), cetixumab (Erbitux), and panitumumab (Vectibix) are currently the three biologic drugs approved for colorectal cancer treatment, but many other drugs are in development.

Targeted therapies involve many different types of drugs and molecular pathways. These include:

Angiogenesis Inhibitors. Anti-angiogenesis drugs inhibit the formation of new blood vessels that supply tumors with the blood, oxygen, and nutrients vital to tumor growth. Angiogenesis inhibitors, such as the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (Avastin), target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Cediranib (Recentin), formerly AZD2171, is a new angiogenesis inhibitor that is in Phase III clinical trials for treatment of colorectal cancer.

Tumor Growth Factor Inhibitors. Tumor growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor, stimulate cell growth. Cetixumab (Erbitux) and panitumumab (Vectibix) are the two currently approved colorectal cancer drugs that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Nimotuzumab (TheraCIM) is currently being studied in combination with irinotecan in Phase III trials.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Tyrosine kinase is an enzyme associated with EGFR that is involved with the signaling mechanisms that prompt cell growth. The EGFR/tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib (Tarceva), which is approved for the treatment of pancreatic and lung cancers, is being investigated as an adjuvant treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Sunitinib (Sutent), which is approved for renal cell carcinoma, is another tyrosine kinase inhibitor in Phase III trials for colorectal cancer.

Radiation Treatment

Radiation therapy uses x-rays to kill cancer cells that might remain after an operation or to shrink large tumors before an operation so that they can be removed surgically. The object of radiation therapy is to damage the tumor as much as possible without harming surrounding tissues. Radiation may be administered in the following ways:

Externally by an x-ray machine (external beam radiation).
By passing radioactive pellets through thin plastic tubes inserted into the intestine.
By implanting tiny radiation seeds directly into the tumor (brachytherapy).
Computer imaging techniques providing 3-dimensional pictures of the cancerous area are allowing precise targeting of radiation to the tumor.

Postoperative radiation treatment combined with chemotherapy is common practice for patients with rectal cancer in Stages II and III. Such patients are at risk of recurrence both at the site of their original tumor and elsewhere in the body. Although there can be significant long-term side effects, the combination of 5-FU and radiation is still considered standard after surgery.

The standard procedure in the U.S. is to apply radiation after surgery (postoperative). Pre-operative chemotherapy and radiation, however, are sometimes used to preserve sphincter-muscle function and reduce the chance that a patient will need a colostomy. Furthermore, some studies suggest that the use of radiation before surgery reduces the likelihood of recurrences and may slightly prolong survival in some patients with rectal cancer. (It has no additional advantages, however, if the subsequent surgery does not completely remove the cancerous regions.) Studies comparing preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy and radiation are currently under way.

Radiation therapy can also be used during surgery (a procedure called intra-operative radiotherapy). It allows the surgeon to move healthy tissue out of the path of the radiation beam.

Short-term side effects of radiation include:

Diarrhea
Skin irritation around the anus
Incontinence
Fatigue
Bowel movement problems

Longer-term complications may include:

Incontinence
Hip and pelvic fractures
Diarrhea
Increased risk for bowel obstruction

Follow-up Testing

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) sets guidelines for follow-up testing to detect recurring cancer after the completion of treatment. The following guidelines are based on ASCO’s 2005 updated recommendations.

Most colorectal cancer recurrences happen within 3 years after surgery. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that a colorectal cancer patient sees their doctor for a physical examination every 3 - 6 months for the first 3 years, every 6 months for the fourth and fifth years, and at the doctor's and patient's discretion during subsequent years.

Patients should have a colonoscopy 3 years after surgery. If the results are normal, patients should then receive a colonoscopy every 5 years. Some patients with hereditary types of colorectal cancer may need more frequent screenings.

A flexible sigmoidoscopy is recommended every 6 months for 5 years for patients with Stage II or III rectal cancer who did not receive radiation therapy.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels should be measured every 3 months after surgery for 3 years in patients with Stage II or III cancer. High CEA levels in the blood may indicate that the cancer has spread to other parts of the body.

Patients at high risk for cancer recurrence should receive an annual computerized tomography (CT) scan for the first 3 years after treatment. The CT scan can help determine if cancer has spread to the lungs or liver. Patients who have had rectal cancer, and did not have radiation therapy, should receive a pelvic CT scan. The scan is not recommended for most lower-risk patients with Stage I or II colorectal cancer.

American Society of Clinical Oncology does not recommend other follow-up blood tests such as complete blood count, liver function tests, fecal occult blood tests. There appears to be no additional benefit for these tests.

Treatment for Metastasized Colorectal Cancer

The liver is the most frequent site for colorectal cancers to spread (metastasized). Here, treatments may slow the spread of cancer and even prolong survival. Cure is very rare.

When cancer has spread, surgery to remove or bypass obstructions in the intestine may be performed. In these circumstances, surgery is considered palliative in that it may improve symptoms but will not lead to cure. In rare cases, metastatic colon cancer may be cured with surgical removal of tumors in areas to which the cancer has spread, such as the liver, ovaries, and lung. The liver is the most common site of spread. Only selected patients may be eligible for such surgery, but in these patients, 5-year survival has been 25% or higher.

Chemotherapy may help improve symptoms and possibly prolong survival in metastasized colorectal cancers. Several investigational drugs are being tested. Doctors are also testing chemotherapy administered directly into the liver -- a treatment called hepatic arterial infusion (HAI). A 2006 study found that hepatic arterial infusion improves survival and quality of life for patients whose cancer has spread to the liver. The study indicated that HAI works better for these patients than chemotherapy delivered intravenously.

Other investigative techniques used to destroy liver tumors include:

Cryosurgery. This approach freezes the tumor or surrounding tissue.
Embolization. Embolization employs a catheter to deliver substances into the liver that block blood vessels and therefore starve the tumor. Chemotherapy is often administered during this procedure.
Radiation.

For end-stage cancer, hospice care is a compassionate option.

Resources

www.cancer.org -- American Cancer Society
www.cancer.gov -- National Cancer Institute
www.oncolink.org -- OncoLink cancer information
www.asco.org -- American Society of Clinical Oncology
www.plwc.org -- People Living with Cancer
www.nccn.org -- National Comprehensive Cancer Network
www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials -- Find clinical trials

References

Chan AT, Ogino S, Fuchs CS. Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in relation to the expression of COX-2. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2131-42.

Cole BF, Baron JA, Sandler RS, Haile RW, Ahnen DJ, Bresalier RS, et al. Folic acid for the prevention of colorectal adenomas: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2007 Jun 6;297(21):2351-9.

Flossmann E, Rothwell PM; British Doctors Aspirin Trial and the UK-TIA AspirinTrial. Effect of aspirin on long-term risk of colorectal cancer: consistent evidencefrom randomised and observational studies. Lancet. 2007 May 12;369(9573):1603-13.

Kerr DJ, Dunn JA, Langman MJ, Smith JL, Midgley RS, Stanley A, et al. Rofecoxib and cardiovascular adverse events in adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):360-9.

Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Shapiro JA, Schulman J. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Dec 19;145(12):880-6.

Meyerhardt JA, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Saltz LB, Hu FB, Mayer RJ, et al. Association of dietary patterns with cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. JAMA. 2007 Aug 15;298(7):754-64.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Routine aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the primary prevention of colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 6;146(5):361-4.

Veit-Haibach P, Kuehle CA, Beyer T, Stergar H, Kuehl H, Schmidt J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer staging with whole-body PET/CT colonography. JAMA. 2006 Dec 6;296(21):2590-600.

Review Date:
9/8/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com