Skip Nav
The Royals
All of Prince George and Princess Charlotte's Matching Outfits Have 1 Thing in Common
Chester Bennington
Linkin Park Frontman Chester Bennington Has Died by Suicide
Iskra Lawrence's Sexy Bikini Pictures Could Give the Kardashians a Run For Their Money
Join The Conversation
creepupmytee creepupmytee 9 years
Maddox! awwww!
Rhapsody Rhapsody 9 years
Nice picture! Maddox is getting so big, he's still super cute though!
Xena Xena 9 years
Now Posh's kid, the one that's getting ready to turn 3, now he's a BADASS! That was so cool that he could do some stuff like that (break dancing and spinning on his head in front of 80,000 people). That shows his "unafraid" personality and confidence. Maddox has never shown that kind of in your face attitude or talent. All I ever see him doing (most of the time) is standing with a scowl on his face.
Xena Xena 9 years
Joanna I totally agree with you. There is nothing special about AJ's kids. I see cuter kids than hers just walking into the grocery store. A lot of people call Maddox a "bad ass" but how do they get that. All you see him doing is walking...that's it!!! WOW..such a People do get star struck and they think celebs are somewhat magical in a's crazy that people think that way. :(
Xena Xena 9 years
BADABING ummm...we aren't slow deary, we can read. Your comment on what Zahara posted is uncalled for and is totally your assumption on what she meant. She said POP was being snarky, not Aqaurium. So, you are just assuming she meant the comment before her. We are going off what she posted as being what she meant, not assuming she meant something else like you.'s really inappropriate for you to call everyone slow. If she made a mistake in wording, then Zahara should have corrected herself. We are just going off point blank what she said...and that's not being slow.
Joanna Joanna 9 years
They are really getting boring. She's so skinny and they both look old. They have kids, big deal. There really is nothing so exciting about any of this. It is the same thing over, over , over and over again. Their kids are okay but they really aren't any cuter than a lot of kids. The majority of the stars show their kids once in a while but not on a daily basis. Is all this really good for the kids? I don't see how it could be....Are they going to school now or just running around?
pinkprincess1101 pinkprincess1101 9 years
wow blob i think what you meant, that this crazy ass loonie gets preferential treatment over middle class people, i totally agree, do you really think if i was a threat to myself a whore and all the crazy things angie is, an adoption agency would give me a child hell no so yes blob is correct that this crazy bitch gets preferential treatment over a middle class person because of her money
Nyrina-Windu Nyrina-Windu 9 years
Angelina is pretty and Maddox is a cutiepie.
pink_magnetism pink_magnetism 9 years
But Pop wasn't the one who called her a homewrecker, so how is that Pop's snark? I'm confused...
berrymix berrymix 9 years
awwww these pictures are sweet. Maddox is my favorite Jolie-Pitt.
ExCape ExCape 9 years
Love that she’s hiding her pregnancy under that great trench coat! Also love pictures of her with Maddox but miss seeing her with Shiloh. She’s beautiful but still too skinny. It’s great to see pictures of her again :).
Badabing! Badabing! 9 years
Ya'll are so slow... *sigh* Z was refering to this: "homewrecker is back." which the pp posted... Thats what he/she thought was SNARKY.
Xena Xena 9 years
Hugh Jackman adopted his kids? I'm really out of the loop! Same with Speilburg..I thought those were his biological kids...Ok, I need to read more about what's what. lol
tiabia tiabia 9 years
Blob, I do think the adoption process isn't fair, but that doesn't mean that the rich or wealthy are buying children, as you put it several times on this post. And if doing mundane things such as boarding a plane, taking your child to school, going skiing, and going to the movies or a toy store is REALLY considered whoring your children, then you need to add Heidi Klum and Seal, David and Victoria Beckham, and a slew of other celebrities to your list. And, yes, I am a fan...just as you are a NON-fan, and everything Jolie does will be wrong and viewed with intense scrutiny.
blob blob 9 years
tiabia, why did you say the adoption process wasn't fair? because the wealthy get preferential treatment. Spielberg has NEVER whored out his kids to People and neither has Sharon Stone or Hugh Jackman. You're a Jolie fan so in your eyes she can do no wrong.
tiabia tiabia 9 years
Ok, Xena...and just like before Dancing with the Stars, the majority of the world STOPPED caring about Marie Osmond right after it was over. Few people probably know that Spielberg has adopted children, too. And that still doesn't explain why Blob keeps saying that the rich are "buying" children. As for Jolie, I've been a fan for a LONG time...and I don't think she's trying to "fool" anyone.
Xena Xena 9 years
I don't understand why it takes so much money to adopt. When you adopt a pet you don't have to shell out all that money, only the money to have them spayed or neutered. You would think the people who had these orphans would gladly give the children to good homes and not even care about the amount of money they get for them. You think the best interest would be the child, NOT the agency that is adopting them out. How much Love a parent can give should be what the agencies look for, not how much money they can give.
blob blob 9 years
Xena, THANK YOU!!!! Brangelina have used their children for photo ops which is wrong. At least Sharon Stone hasn't done that.
Xena Xena 9 years
Tiabia I know I'm not in your conversation, but just after I put this in, I will jump out again. :) I think that Brad and Angie use their kids to their advantage. There are some celebrities that you would never even know they had adopted kids (like Marie Osmond). You can hardly find ANY photos of her kids on the Internet anywhere. There are hundreds of Angie and Brad's kids, and they all have a price. They talk about their privacy and how sacred it is, but they chose this career and they still continue to make movies, even though they have enough money to live comfortably (out of the limelight) for the rest of their lives and never have to work again. That whole photo shoot of Brad/Angie/Maddox on the beach (the first photos of them), were taken from far off and were supposed to look like they were "caught" so to speak, because Brad was still married. But..then it came out that the whole thing was setup by Angelina and the photos went to the highest bidder for over a million dollars! To me, that was a horrible thing, especially knowing that Brad was still married. I would not have wanted those pics out in public knowing it would cause pain to J.A and her family, MUST LESS set the thing up myself like AJ did. They know pics of their kids will sell and they play on that. In interviews I've heard Brad say the EXACT same things over and over again about knowing what it feels like to have a "bounty" on his head...but, he and AJ is who puts the bounty there. People talk about Britney calling the paps and telling them where she will be, you don't think Brad and AJ's people do the same thing 75% of the time? If they want kids...great! As long as they can give them a safe, stable, and calm home to grow up in. Personally I think it's too much traveling, and too much sleeping in different cities if it were my kids. They put this "we do it all our self" feeling out there concerning the kids, and they don't do it all themselves. They have about 15 people on staff for cooking, bodyguards, drivers, and nannies. They didn't show you the Nanny that went to the movies with Angelina and Maddox, because Angie doesn't want you to see that. There are many people that AJ can't fool into believing what she wants people to believe, and that's where you get a lot of the "issues" people have with her. Just saying :)
tiabia tiabia 9 years
Clearly it's not fair, but I don't see why you have to trash Jolie, Sharon Stone and all the other wealthy people that are providing loving homes and families for children.
blob blob 9 years
Why should rich people get preferential treatment in the adoption process? Wealth doesn't make people good parents (just look at Paris and her ilk)
blob blob 9 years
Yes, I think the adoption process favors wealthy famous people and I think that's wrong. There are plenty of people who want to adopt but they don't have $20,000+ for the process.
blob blob 9 years
Sharon Stone does not have any biological children. She adopted 3 blue-eyed, blonde, Caucasian boys. And we all know there aren't a lot of Caucasian babies up for adoption
tiabia tiabia 9 years
So AGAIN, your issue is with the adoption process. You can't blame the rich or propose that they are BUYING children because agencies give them preference.
blob blob 9 years
READ WHAT I POSTED!!!!!My problme is that the rich get preferential treatment over average people who want to adopt. Middle-class people can be great parents too but some don't have the ridiculous amount of money it takes to adopt.
George and Charlotte in Poland and Germany Pictures 2017
Manolo Vegara's Funniest Social Media Moments
Angelina Jolie Buys Cecil B. DeMille's Mansion
Cutest Jolie-Pitt Family Pictures
From Our Partners
Latest Celebrity & Entertainment
All the Latest From Ryan Reynolds