Skip Nav
Emily Ratajkowski
Emily Ratajkowski Poses Naked For Allure Because That's Her F*cking Choice
The Royals
Princess Charlotte, Total Trooper, Still Manages to Shake Hands With People While Crying
The Royals
All of Prince George and Princess Charlotte's Matching Outfits Have 1 Thing in Common

Photos of Emma Roberts in Underwear For GQ

Emma Roberts For GQ — Tasteful or Too Much Too Soon?

It's hard to believe it's been almost two years since we were asking you all if Emma Roberts was the biggest star of tomorrow. Now she's 18 and apparently ready for more grownup projects — like this photo shoot for GQ. It's hard not to think of Emma as Julia's young niece, so tell us what you think of these photos — tasteful or too much?

Join The Conversation
Michaelrcks Michaelrcks 8 years
Rina92 Rina92 8 years
she looks so pretty though...
angelinemarie angelinemarie 8 years
weird, i didnt know we were the same age... i thought she was younger than me. still, this is awkward
chikaloka chikaloka 8 years
I love Emma Roberts and think she is gorgeous, but this is too much too soon. She's so young, barely legal and already fulfilling the pedo-fantasies of GQ readers....EWWWW!!!!
genesisrocks genesisrocks 8 years
It's probably a good career choice for her if she doesn't wanna be stuck in the cutesy tween roles forever. At least she hasn't totally destroyed her image a la Lindsay Lohan.
laellavita laellavita 8 years
my only problem with it is that it is a complete 180 from how she used to portray herself, as a teenage role model to girls who was just in a movie like hotel for dogs, and now she's stripping down. sure, you can't see anything, but it's suggesting a whole lot. she JUST turned 18 and 40-50 year old men look at this magazine, when their daughters will be looking up to her in teenbeat
mariejoeyjacobs mariejoeyjacobs 8 years
SHES SO PRETTY!! I like her :D
ThePerfectScore ThePerfectScore 8 years
They are not inappropriate. But she looks dumb as Hell. Why is she looking to the side with such a vacant expression?
nikecold nikecold 8 years
Considering that those twin who posed for playboy on The Girls Next Door were 18 back when they did that i'll say its ok. And sandy I agree but these seem alright to me.
sandy82 sandy82 8 years
I'm tired of seeing women's photos sexed up in some way. What ever happened to being classy?
sidra5397 sidra5397 8 years
sidra5397 sidra5397 8 years
Her bottoms look more like some ugly shorts more than anything. I just think it's annoying that the moment some of these starlets and stars (I'm talking to you Zac Efron!) hit a certain age they have to throw out some random looking photo that's supposed show how mature they've become by emphasizing their sexulitiy. We get it that you're young and hot... I've got no problem with sexy photoshoots... just ones that are trying too hard to prove something (You too Zac!)... Also, it's creepy that the photos are in a men's magazine. It's like they just couldn't wait until she hit 18 so that it would be alright to start gawking at her...
juicebox07 juicebox07 8 years
There is nothing wrong with these photos. Now if you could kind of see her nipples through her shirt... well, that would be another story.
ansoliz ansoliz 8 years
She looks cute. There have been much worse from much younger girls.
ohbaby7 ohbaby7 8 years
shes 18! shes showing less skin that the girls in shape and fitness, and for a shoot in GQ- its definitely tasteful. Props to her for not begin afraid to venture beyond Disneyworld
msshellokitty msshellokitty 8 years
i think that it's inappropriate.she just turned 18 and i don't understand why these girls think posing in these men's magazines make that grown's kind of icky because she looks like a teenager and not like a woman.
azh azh 8 years
the girl from Acquamarin is julia`s niece.. wooww... time moves fast..
tellmemorex2 tellmemorex2 8 years
I mean they're not sexy or inappropiate..but im sort of icked out by them..she looks like a little kid, awkward.
avocado_seed avocado_seed 8 years
She's 18, so she can pose how she likes, but these pictures are meant to be sexy... as even the GQ website describes them as such. She's wearing a skimpy tanktop and boxer briefs, and honestly, I think the pictures are a bit jailbait fetish-y just because she looks so young and virginal in them...
PensaGrey PensaGrey 8 years
So we should pose in boy undies at 18, lingerie at 21 and what by 30? a skeleton? It has nothing to do with age or what year it is, but more self worth and at what length would you go to for fame and money. That's for each one of us to decide for ourselves, there's no right or wrong answer.
CYL CYL 8 years
Isista .. in terms of your point about the adult magazine, just because its in an adult magazine doesn't mean you won't pick it up if you are a young fan and your idol is in is after 2009 as you said...
mommapoppins mommapoppins 8 years
It isn't even a cute, skimpy outfit. Looks like her bloomers are a wee bit too big.
Isista Isista 8 years
...Wow. It's 2009 people. She's not exposing anything distasteful and she doesn't look overtly sexy. And remember: this is for an adult magazine. Therefore *adults* should be reading it, not children.
I think it's too much too soon. Call me prudish all you want but even if she is 18, when did she ever hint at the idea of becoming a "sex symbol?" I know that you'll argue that it is just one photoshoot and it's not very racy, but obviously it'll just get more and more provocative from here on out. I myself am 19, and I'm not a saint or anything, but even at 18 I would never consider posing for GQ, even if this is nothing racy compared to some of its other photoshoots. I just think this is calling on all pedophiles.
Emma Roberts Instagram With Julia Roberts at the 2017 Oscars
Emma Roberts New Engagement Ring From Evan Peters Dec. 2016
5 New Styling Hacks You Need to Know, Straight From Emma Roberts
Emma Roberts Birthday Message For Evan Peters 2017
From Our Partners
Latest Celebrity & Entertainment
All the Latest From Ryan Reynolds