Back of Sienna and Balthazar Reunite For Italian Bikini Makeout Time Sienna Miller and Balthazar Getty reunited in Positano, Italy, over the weekend to pick up on their steamy, string bikini-filled romance. When we saw Balthazar heading out of LA last week, we suspected a rendezvous might be coming, and as usual it looks like these two can't keep their hands off each other. They were joined by some friends on the boat, but that didn't stop Sienna and Balthazar from engaging in a legs-tangled embrace lying right next to their companions. By Sunday night, Balthazar was back in LA, but clearly things are still going strong for the PDA-loving controversial duo. View 5 Photos › Photo 1 Photo 2 Photo 3 Photo 4 Photo 5 Splash News Online Comments get-like-beef 8 years Sienna =/ i like her style though she's an ok actress, but her personal life is a hotmess c2robin 8 years One of the problems is the fact that media outlets like this keep glorifying the AFFAIR by calling it "romantic" and advocating not taking responsibility for one's bad behavior. That is totally insensitive, since there is nothing "romantic" or "cute" about SM/BG publicly humilating an innocent mother and her 4 kids over and over. RG/her kids have kept a VERY LOW PROFILE and are PRIVATELY coping with the mess created by SM/BG VERY PUBLIC AFFAIR and everytime SM feels the need to keep herself relevant they have to relive their pain . After these Italy pictures, how hard do you think it was for RG/her kids to face their co-workers, peers, and friends? SM defenders seem to think that RG/kids feelings is soley BG's responsibility, but they are wrong. There is nothing "romantic" about playing the victim to defelct from one's antics with another woman's HUSBAND, SLEEPING OR PUBLICLY ENGAGING IN PDA WITH ANOTHER WOMAN'S HUSBAND, shamelessly flaunting it via staged photo-ops/PR stories, creating "personal attacks" to drum up sympathy, spreading lies about the MARRIED MAN's wife/marriage to justify one's behavior, and blaming others to deflect from one's behavior with another woman's HUSBAND. If SM had any respect for herself and other women, she would have told the MARRIED MAN "NO" or waited until the MARRIED MAN filed a divorce/legal separation before happily prancing around LA, Italy, Prague, NY, and London with him on shopping, dining, clubbing, hotel hopping, kissing, vacation, and those "embarassing" photo excursions (including drawing attention to herself by showing off bruises from sex with the MARRIED MAN and wearing "his" watch). Teens read stuff like this and think that it is okay to interefere in ANOTHER WOMAN's MARRIAGE/RELATIONSHIP because it must be right if "everyone is doing it". It also gives teens the impression that they can escape the consequences of their actions by blaming someone else or hiding behind the double standard argument. If you don't believe this to be true, just look at those comments that claim that SM isn't doing anything wrong because she is a "single woman, not the married one, or didn't take vows" or "not saying no is irrelevant". bluesteyes 8 years I see this post gets some of us going huh? Well here is what I think about the whole thing. THEY CHEATED. Yep, she slept with him while he was married and his wife left him because of that. I think he was bored in his marriage or he had problems and he didn't do it the manly way by asking for time out and not sleeping around. Instead he went with someone young who didn't give a shit if he was already married. Sienna sounds like Jolie to me. The difference is the later can fall back on her UN works but Sienna has nothing. c2robin 8 years Why do SM defenders keep on insisting that we would be able to "understand" SM situation if we knew the FULL STORY? SHE IS HAVING A VERY PUBLIC AFFAIR WITH ANOTHER WOMAN'S HUSBAND, so there is nothing to understand about voluntarily sleeping with a MARRIED MAN,constantly publicly whining/complaining about her "pain" as she shamelessly flaunts the AFFAIR, and then spreading lies about RG/her marriage (ie-they were separated, marriage was over, they were having problems). You don't need to know the FULL STORY to understand that 5 people were hurt because SM didn't have the decency to REJECT THE SEXUAL ADVANCES OF A MARRIED MAN. No matter how many times you try to spin it the outcome is still the same, IT WAS SM RESPONSIBILITY TO TELL THE MARRIED MAN "NO". What is difficult to understand is why some media outlets keep "sugarcoating" the AFFAIR. Instead of calling it what it is they try it pass it off as something "romantic" . BG IS A MARRIED MAN, so there is absolutely nothing "romantic" or cute about sleeping or publicly engaging in PDA with a ANOTHER WOMAN'S HUSBAND. The message this sends to teens is that they can disrespect ANOTHER WOMAN'S MARRIAGE/RELATIONSHIP because it is "cool" and they can "escape" the consequences of their actions by hiding behind the victim of "double standard argument". These photos don't show two people in love; they show two selfish, desperate, insensitive, vindictive, and irresponsible people. The picture where BG and SM supposedly are involved in a "legs-tangled embrace", looks like the MARRIED MAN passed out on top of SM and she is trying to save face by making it appear more than what it is. Like all of her PR stunts, this was not necessary and just shows what little respect SM has for other women. She wasn't content with people "suspecting" that she was still sleeping with BG, she had to show everyone THAT SHE IS STILL SLEEPING WITH A MARRIED MAN so they won't forget that she "won". If SM had any real talent or beauty, she wouldn't have to resort to PDA stunts with ANOTHER WOMAN's HUSBAND to keep herself relevant. If she had any real talent or beauty she wouldn't have to compete with a MARRIED MOTHER of 4 and her 4 kids for a man. You don't need to know the full story in order to understand this, IT'S COMMON SENSE. dallastarzz 8 years Sienna and Balthazar oh boy!! Again?! SM hussy. BG d*ckhead. Italy is beautiful. bluesteyes 8 years Sienna is what..hum..loves to have fun I guess. He likes being a free man she's taking advantage of his availability. I don't think it will last to be honest but hey they might surprise us! He has children and so far I have to yet seen her playing a nice serious girlfriend with his kids. alejmeg27 8 years Sorry but unless you know the full story (not what the media states) then you really can't bash anyone. The media always love to twist it all around.. sunseeker1 8 years can anybody in the USA please tell me what a WINGMAN is, apparently getty is joaquin phoenix's wingman. THANKS RaCheer 8 years Jealous...Positano is my favorite place on earth! bitterliberation 8 years well this is about the same situation as the whole pitt, aniston and jolie love triangle. i hate jolie for that so im gonna say i really hate sienna now. sienna's the second most disgasting celebrity on my list. top spot still goes to miss jolie sunseeker1 8 years MALEE WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS THAT THEY WHERE NOT SEPARATED BUT HE WAS UNHAPPY AT HOME. STILL AT HOME BUT HAD NOT TOLD HIS WIFE THAT HE WAS SEPARATED, THAT IS MY BEEF. SEPARATE FIRST BEFORE YOU START ANOTHER RELATIONSHIP, WITH RESPECT FOR YOUR WIFE AND CHILDREN. I WONDER HOW ANY OF YOU WOULD FEEL IF IT HAPPENED TO YOU, YOU DON'T HAVE TO EXPERIENCE IT TO KNOW HOW IT FEELS. joannn 8 years omg, I can't stand these two either. But erm....why are people writing thesis length replies? c2robin 8 years Since BG is still a VERY MARRIED MAN and hasn't started the divorce process, that means that SM is having a VERY PUBLIC AFFAIR with a MARRIED MAN. SLEEPING and PUBLICLY ENGAGING IN PDA WITH ANOTHER WOMAN's HUSBAND and shamelessly flaunting it is not cute or "romantic", it's sad and pathetic. Why is SM showing so much contempt for RG/kids by constantly rubbing the AFFAIR in their faces while they are attempting to deal with the mess created by SM/BG VERY PUBLIC AFFAIR? We are supposed to believe that the MARRIED MAN is "in love" with SM because he flew to UK and was photographed messing around with her on a boat in Italy? Since BG got on a plane, had sex with SM, and then promptly left when he was finished with her, doesn't that mean that SM is BG's "booty-call" or "friend with benefits" (But of course SM defenders won't admit this, they will just claim he left because of filming)? When I look at these photos, I see what little respect BG has for SM and what little repect SM has for other women. BG is not "in love" with SM, he is only with her because: 1)He doesn't have any other options, his wife doesn't want him and no decent woman would give him the time of day. Since he is stuck with SM, he is just making the best out of his circumstances. She only kept her clothes on this time because she wanted to show that she can make the MARRIED MAN interested in her without having to take off her clothes. I wonder how much he had to drink in order to perform those PDA scenes with his mistress. 2)SM is footing the bill for BG's expenses, so that is why the MARRIED MAN got on a plane and was with her on that boat. Considering the fact that SM just won that settlement money from that UK tabloid, it is very plausible that she gave BG the money so that he wouldn't be "embarassed" to appear with her in public again. She paid for his plane ticket(s), hotel, and of course his supply of alcohol. 3)As SM just proved, she doesn't have any qualms about sleeping with another WOMAN's HUSBAND. She won that settlement money and now thinks that she has earned the right to flaunt the affair. The public wouldn't be so outraged by her behavior, if she would just show some consideration for RG/her kids feelings by waiting until the MARRIED MAN files for a divorce before she leaks these photos and PR stories about her adventures with the MARRIED MAN. Of course, she can't wait because she knows that the MARRIED MAN has no intentions of filing for a divorce. She is desperately trying to force RG into a divorce because the married man is stalling. 4) BG doesn't have to give SM anything in exchange for sex or make any major commitments to her. When he was finished with SM, he LEFT just like he did when he went to UK (which was probably funded and paid for by SM). Now SM is desperately trying to make up for BG's lack of commitment to her by releasing these PDA photos and PR stories about the married man buying her a bike to make it appear that she and the married man have a "great romance". If he loved SM, he wouldn't keep treating her like a "booty-call". Can someone please tell SM that the money and settlement from that UK tabloid does not mean that the public/media approves of her VERY PUBLIC AFFAIR WITH ANOTHER WOMAN's HUSBAND. Talking about wanting the married man to propose to her is just plain stupid, considering that he is STILL MARRIED and 5 innocent people have been hurt by the AFFAIR. Like she has done in the past, she will continue to whine and compalin about her "pain" while she continues to help a married man betray his family. If anyone still thinks that SM is a victim after seeing these photos, it is only because they have chosen to ignore SM bad behavior. TADOW 8 years they're both nasty whores, but I dont care because he's not my man. I am just so excited to see what the settlement for his wife will be. Take him to the cleaners honey! TheRave 8 years Balthazar + Sienna= Sleaze When I watch Brothers & Sisters now I record so I can fast forward his scenes. What a loser! TEAM ROSETTA!!!!!!!!!!!!!! agentnikita 8 years Nasty. I refuse to watch anything she's in. They're both disgusting. Shocking 8 years This couple makes me want to barf! This just shows you money does not buy class because these two are both pathetic human beings. Sienna sure loves being a exhibitionist. I'm sure she would gladly fuck him if he asked right in front of camera's and the other couple there. SHE IS SKANKY! MissyB1984 8 years Repulsive and disgusting RoyalBlueMoss 8 years Oh and Sienna looks great in her bikini. RoyalBlueMoss 8 years Just because Getty was pictured with his wife at some events doesn't mean they were not separated. They might of been trying to stay friends. Look at David Duchovny and his wife. They have separated for months and no one has known until now because we still saw them photographed together. I do believe Getty and his wife were separated when he started to see Sienna. I hope them all the best. she deserves better than how the public is treating her. estella241 8 years Well, at least she's wearing a top this time. outofhere 8 years I agree, repulsive. sherylynne 8 years They are completely repulsive. There is NOTHING remotely attractive about either of them, they are NOT cute together, and they are NOT the least bit interesting or fascinating. They are absolute nothings. My beef is that I had to lay eyes on yet another batch of pictures of them while in search of something interesting. Seriously, can the paps just not bother with them? Solaera 8 years A distant cousin of Balthazar's is a friend of mine and I can tell you Rosetta and Balthazar were not separated when he started fooling around with Sienna. The affair came as a total shock to Rosetta. Balthazar had even went as far as renting a little love nest in LA for their trysts which really enraged the family when the news of the affair broke. No divorece papers have been filed and if anyone were to file it would have to be Balthazar because Rosetta refuses to do so. Ikandy 8 years Those 2 were caught fooling around in early july, and his kid was born in july also...Id say hes pretty f'd up, regardless of what happened between him and his wife...thats just plain wrong.