Skip Nav
What's New on Netflix in August: Nostalgic Classics and 1 of 2016's Best Musicals
Award Season
Here Are MTV's 2017 VMA Nominees!
Amy Schumer
Anne Hathaway Might Be Stepping Into Barbie's Pink High Heels For the Live-Action Movie

The Women: Not Fizzy, Just Empty

Philosophically, the very existence of The Women is something that makes me cheer. As its title suggests, it's a movie full of only women — and many of them "women of a certain age," at that. Director and screenwriter Diane English spent years trying to steer her remake of George Cukor's 1939 classic to the screen, and I respect and admire her determination. A powerful remake of The Women could have sent yet another signal that moviegoers want to see women on screen in all their beautiful, imperfect, daffy, lovable, clueless, fantastic glory.

On screen, though, The Women disappoints to an almost depressing degree. It's not an outright disaster; there are good moments from nearly everyone in the gigantic cast. But it's not screwball enough to honor its '30s movie heritage, not clever enough to make for a fun night out at the theater. And its own message on women is utterly conflicted, threatening to undermine the potential positive impact of bringing an all-female movie to the big screen.

Meg Ryan stars as Mary Haines, whose life comes complete with adorable daughter, fabulous luncheons, and blooming garden she planted herself. If there are cracks in that shiny veneer, she'd hardly notice; as a friend, Alex (Jada Pinkett Smith), points out, she's too busy filling them in. So it knocks her flat when she finds out — thanks to her gossipy manicurist (Debi Mazar) — that her husband is having an affair with the Saks perfume "spritzer girl" (Eva Mendes). That betrayal would be bad enough, but before long, there's another one, courtesy of her best friend Sylvie (Annette Bening), who sells out Mary to save her own floundering career. The Women does fine with that broad sketch of a plot. It's in the details that the movie loses its footing, so


Some of the movie's issues lie in the direction, which isn't confident enough to pull off some of the more screwball elements. English also doesn't seem to know how to use Bette Midler, who has a brief cameo that is delightful to watch but doesn't contribute much to the story, and Debra Messing and Smith are hardly in the movie. The whole look of the film is flat — understandable given its relatively small budget, but far from engaging for a viewer.

What The Women gets right is Mary's devastation at Sylvie's betrayal; losing her husband wouldn't have been so bad if the whole mess hadn't taken her friend along with it. The few scenes with the friends together are a treat, especially when they're plotting their confrontation of (and revenge against) the spritzer girl. Mendes basically just has to act hot and stupid, and she does that well. And Candice Bergen is amusing as Mary's mother, who dispenses advice that seems to be from another era.

Or is it? The Women seems confused about its own thoughts on women's roles. And while I can live with the ultimate outcome of Mary's journey to find herself (though I thought it was far too easy and predictable), what I can't condone is the movie's treatment of Mary's daughter Molly, who is basically a living representation of Why Women Hate Themselves. In her first scene, she tells Mary she's on a diet because she's fat; Mary laughs it off . Over the course of the movie, she starts smoking to keep from eating, burns tampons because she hates being a girl, and laments that she doesn't understand why magazine editors like Sylvie send such mixed signals to women. Sylvie's ultimate response when confronted with all of Molly's baggage? "I'm a hypocrite. Life is complicated."

That's all?

Sadly, that empty, cop-out response is far too apt a metaphor for The Women as a whole.

Photos courtesy of Picturehouse

Join The Conversation
bransugar79 bransugar79 8 years
I'm going with a group of women tomorrow night just for fun. I love the original and never had much hope for this remake but hopefully it will be a fun litte outing anyway. The great thing about the 1939 version was that it didn't seem to be pandering to anyone it was pretty real and straight forward and ahead of it's time. I don't thin a studio out there now would ever green light an appropriate remake that stands up to the older one. It's sad because it seems that the media is taking us farther back by trying to promote a plastic version of what women are really about
fashionista119 fashionista119 8 years
The original is so good. It's one of my favorites old movies. It's too bad this remake sounds so dissapointing :(
It looked stupid and sad. I just never got a real sense of anything good from this movie. Which is shame because women have so much more to offer. I don't even like the plot of this story.
BostonChick BostonChick 8 years
@LaDolceVita: hahaha. Same here. Well, tomorrow night with my mom and sister...maybe I should bring my ipod. ha!
girlA girlA 8 years
Yeah, I haven't been able to figure out what exactly Meg did to her face, but she looks strange.
emalove emalove 8 years
This movie looks so lame...I can't even watch the previews without getting annoyed. And I agree that Meg looks really weird.
Frank-y-Ava Frank-y-Ava 8 years
Keep it real, Buzz, keep it real!
fleurfairy fleurfairy 8 years
Meg Ryan ruined her face.
Francoisehardly Francoisehardly 8 years
I'm more likely to check out the original.
LaDolceVita LaDolceVita 8 years
Aaahhh! I'm supposed to see this on Monday with My mom and sisters!!! Hope it isn't TOO bad!!
Nitachequita Nitachequita 8 years
I just don't understand how the same woman responsible for Murphy Brown could put out such a shrill (judging by the preview ) and disappointing movie.
Linda-McP Linda-McP 8 years
Thanks for the honest review, Buzz. Think I'll pass on this one.
tiabia tiabia 8 years
I'm not surprised. And what the heck happened to Meg Ryan's face...YIKES
jopperma jopperma 8 years
On the plus side, Meg Ryan's hair looks really cute!
nadioz nadioz 8 years
not surprised by the reviews it's getting.
Deidre Deidre 8 years
Give me the 1939 version anyday. I really wish Hollywood would stop with the remakes.
CaterpillarGirl CaterpillarGirl 8 years
The 1937 version is way better.
briggs313 briggs313 8 years
uhhh did anyone think it would do well? this movie looks horrible, pass.
Troian Bellisario Is Glad Eating Disorders Are Being Represented in Film
Books Similar to Father of the Bride
Will and Grace Reboot Trailer
Will and Grace Revival Set Photo March 2017
From Our Partners
Latest Entertainment
All the Latest From Ryan Reynolds