Skip Nav
Books
Join the 2017 POPSUGAR Reading Challenge
Women
No Boys Allowed: 30+ Duo Costumes to Rock With Your BFF
Tattoos
30+ Matching Tattoos For Couples Who Are in It to Win It

Landmark Decision in Manboob Ogling Struggle

Click to Read

Landmark Decision in Manboob Ogling Struggle Last year a British court found Kevin Bassett, 44, guilty of violating the 2003 Sexual Offences Act after he secretly filmed a man in his swimming trunks and no top at a swimming pool. Lawyers argued that the man's chest did not constitute "private parts," and the act only referred to women's breasts as such. A judge this week squashed that ruling, saying, "This act didn't mean to refer to the male chest but only to female breasts, it follows that the judge's directions on the meaning of breasts was erroneous." And check out Giggle's legendary picture collage and take on the case.

0 Comments
raciccarone raciccarone 9 years
That guy was asking for it. You don't walk around with hot, sweet pecs and expect to not to get ogled?
stephley stephley 9 years
Doesn't it?! Very creepy.
harmonyfrance harmonyfrance 9 years
Something about this post makes me very uncomfortable. :rotfl:
stephley stephley 9 years
Imagine going to law school so you could spend you day debating what constitutes male naughty bits.
Chadwick Boseman Is About to Be 2 Different Superheroes
11 Over-the-Knee Boots That Will Have You Feelin' Yourself
There's Only 1 Good Thing About Woody Allen's New Film
Woody Allen Says He's "Sad" For Harvey Weinstein
From Our Partners
Latest Love
All the Latest From Ryan Reynolds