Skip Nav
28 Cool Ideas For a Summer Wedding
The Telling Sign You're in a Toxic Relationship and Need to Get Out Now
Does Being Born Late in Your Zodiac Sign Impact Your Personality?

MTV's Skins Compared to Shakespeare on NPR

Don't Kill the Messenger: Media vs. Literature

If teens have sex in real life, why can't they on television? The question has already been asked, and the answer is usually "because ad revenues say so." But today Robert Thompson, a professor of culture at Syracuse University, pinned TV and film up against books by asking how is Skins different than explicit sex and adult plot lines in literature.

Well, we could end the argument by saying more kids watch TV than read books, and visuals are more seductive than 11-point New Baskerville font, but we won't. Let's ignore that intrusive point on the grounds that kids have access to pretty much every book ever written. Thompson cites the perennial high school freshman read Romeo and Juliet as a tale with a message unfit for 14-year-olds: two kids kill themselves because they can't be together.

Then he moves to the sexually graphic, masturbation fest of a book Portnoy's Complaint, which probably wasn't on your high school reading list. He read it early (and, just a guess, but probably often) and told NPR today it was transformative for him. Read what he said below.


"When I was about 13, I discovered Philip Roth's novel Portnoy's Complaint. It was considered a dirty book. I read that book and I found it insightful and it helped me think about some things I was thinking about and all the rest of it."

The "insight" he describes could either be masturbation techniques or the culturally relevant divide that separates the highbrow from the low. It's a tossup! But what separates the serious from the smut is rarely agreed upon. I've never seen Skins, but I know its point is to depict teen behavior as realistically as possible with amateur actors, young writers, and cameras rolling. Is it trash or an unappreciated treasure? It's too early to say, but the only thing separating it from Lady Chatterley's Lover — a book the United States Post Office refused to deliver — is time.

Which brings me to this question: will TV, movies, and other visuals seem as harmless as text does today if virtual reality entertainment becomes the norm? Or will attention-grabbing visuals and advertising revenue keep them salacious for years to come?

Join The Conversation
Pistil Pistil 6 years
I felt mean thinking it, but yes those are some unfortunate-looking kids. I guess one thing is that you can't really read an entire novel passively, the way one might watch a TV show. Shakespeare is studied. If someone were to sit down with teens and guide them in a critical study of a TV show like Skins, that might be beneficial... and take all the fun out of it.
postmodernsleaze postmodernsleaze 6 years
Haha, yeah, these kids look like they've taken one too many Quaaludes.
Bettye-Wayne Bettye-Wayne 6 years
Well I don't know if I'm even addressing this article with my comment but let me say, it puzzles the hell out of me why TV, movie and video games need a rating system and books don't. Because books have less impact? I think it can be argued that books have more impact than most other mediums. I'm completely opposed to book banning, but shouldn't a reader receive the same warning (about sex, drug use, swearing, violence) as a tv viewer? Hell, a book rating system would be the best way to get kids to pick up books! What teenager wouldn't want to read 'For Whom the Bell Tolls' once they know it's got sex and gratuitous violence in it?
Studio16 Studio16 6 years
These are some of the most disturbing looking children I've ever seen.
Jennifer Lopez World of Dance Outfits
First  Female Filmmaker True Story
Officers Create Blue's Clues Shirt For Teen With Autism
Kingsman the Golden Circle Plot Details
From Our Partners
Latest Love
All the Latest From Ryan Reynolds