Skip Nav
This Year's Out100 List Is the Most Powerful, Diverse, and Heroic Yet
For You Music Video With Sexual Assault Survivors and Allies
Sexual Harassment
Watch What Happens When 39 Women Come Together to Make a Music Video About Sexual Assault
Love Has No Labels Rising Video
Ad Campaigns
I'm Still Wiping Tears Off My Face After Watching the New Love Has No Labels Film
Natural Disaster
The Fires Devastating Both Northern and Southern California Are Truly Haunting
Tech News
Snapchat's New Features Are Perfect For Friends Who Only Communicate in Bitmoji

NYT Antiabortion Op-Ed

The NYT Published an Antiabortion Op-Ed Without Clearly Identifying the Author's Bias

Following President Donald Trump's election, the nation's newspaper of note, The New York Times, has made a concerted effort to publish perspectives from a variety of contributors across party lines. Whether or not one agrees with The Times's commitment to reporting every possible viewpoint (regardless of its factual basis), the newspaper does owe its readers full transparency.

On May 9, The Times published an article written by Lori Szala, a director for the antiabortion group Human Coalition. Despite her objectively biased position, nowhere in the essay does Szala actually spell out the organization she works for; her position is included at the bottom of the story in small text with no hyperlink to Human Coalition's website (a key component of understanding the group's mission).

In her piece, Szala offers an attempted rebuttal to the progressive argument that abortion is an economic issue. Without giving too much credence to Szala's claims, she counters by asserting that describing abortion as an economic issue is "dehumanizing." Szala also contends that just because a woman receives an abortion does not mean her problems disappear. While it's certainly true that a woman "will leave the clinic still burdened by every single problem she came in with," it's the unfortunate truth that her life would be undeniably more difficult had she been forced to rear a child, or give it up.


Without mentioning the op-ed specifically, the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL) subtly reiterated its position on abortion access on Twitter.

And NARAL's President Ilyse Hogue reacted more explicitly to The Times's lack of full disclosure.

At face value, the Human Coalition appears to be a tolerant organization devoted to protecting life at all stages. In reality, the Human Coalition is a religious organization that operates a number of "pregnancy crisis centers" aimed at counseling women against abortion across the country. Szala herself operates the South Hills Pregnancy Resource center in Pittsburgh, PA, which The Times also failed to disclose.

Image Source: Getty / Drew Angerer
From Our Partners
Jason Bateman Apology For NYT Arrested Development Interview
Greta Gerwig Quotes About Woody Allen in New York Times
Is Property Brothers Fake?
Out Magazine's Out 100 List 2018
Michelle Obama's Open Letter in The Chicago Defender
California Wildfires in Ventura and Butte County | Pictures
Why Michelle Obama Will Never Forgive Donald Trump
TransMilitary Interview With Laila Ireland October 2018
Women Who Won in the 2018 Midterms
Women Leave Voting Stickers on Susan B. Anthony's Grave 2018
Me Voting in 2016 vs. 2018 Midterm Election Day Twitter Meme
Hurricane Michael Personal Essay
From Our Partners
Latest News
All the Latest From Ryan Reynolds